<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOGas</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2473-1889</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojogas.2021.64016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOGas-112780</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Analysis on Well Drilling Example of Deepwater Block in the Gulf of Mexico
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Zheng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jinsheng</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Marketing Department of Oilfield Technology Division of China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Shenzhen Operation Company of Oilfield Technology Division of China Oilfield Services Limited, Shenzhen, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Mexico Project Team of Oilfield Technology Division of China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  With the innovation and development of offshore oil drilling technology, drilling wells in deep waters areas have become an important activity for the development of new hydrocarbon reservoirs in this type of environment. CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation) won the rights to exploit two unexplored deepwater blocks in the Gulf of Mexico, in a bid realized by the Mexican Government (CNH), in 2016. The challenge to combine the newest technology with the oil industry experienced knowledge to lead the exploration and development of these deep-water blocks in Mexico is around the corner. Therefore, the basic techniques for deep waters wells drilling and the main potential risks are expounded in this paper. A set of deep waters wells drilling processes and methodologies are previously designed, and a specific case is demonstrated next, which provides a referential model for deep waters wells drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>The Gulf of Mexico</kwd><kwd> Deepwater Drilling</kwd><kwd> Directional Drilling</kwd><kwd> Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Preface</title><p>With the constant innovative development of offshore oil drilling technology and continuous use of 10,000 feet large drilling equipment of CNOOC, the offshore oil deepwater drilling capacity has been greatly improved. The Gulf of Mexico has rich oil and gas reserves, and its deepwater blocks belong to the USA and Mexico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) respectively according to different geographic positions. At the end of 2016, CNOOC won the bid of Block 1 and Block 4 in the deepwater area of Burgos Basin of Perdido Folded Belt Zone with regard to the deepwater block in the Gulf of Mexico. Block 1 covers an area of 1678 Km<sup>2</sup>, the water depth is 1000 m - 3100 m, and the offshore distance is 160 Km. Block 4 covers an area of 1877 Km<sup>2</sup>, the water depth is 600 m - 2000 m, and the offshore distance is 140 Km. CNOOC won 100% rights of these two blocks. Previously, Pemex had certain discoveries in the southern Trion and eastern Supremo blocks of Block 1 N. PEMEX carried out the operation of two exploratory wells from 2012 to 2014, which was close to #1 Block N of CNOOC. It is estimated that the oil reserves of Supremo Block are 125 million barrels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref1">1</xref>]. Therefore, it is rather important to make preparations in advance: design and optimize the drilling technologies according to the characteristics of the Gulf of Mexico.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Introduction to Geological Structure of the Gulf of Mexico</title><p>The hydrocarbon reservoir formations of the deepwater blocks from the Gulf of Mexico belong to the Cenozoic and Mesozoic Eras. Cenozoic is a terrigenous clastic rock deposition. In the Mesozoic Era is possible to find 2 source rocks that generated the hydrocarbons that feed the reservoirs rocks from the Cenozoic: the Upper Jurassic Tithonian and the Upper Cretaceous Turonian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref2">2</xref>]. Another important point to have in consideration is the presence of salt in the area, which is well developed due to the intense activity in the zone, forming different types of structures: salt canopy, salt stock, salt sheet, salt wall, salt weld, salt tongue, etc. Normally these salt structures are located above the reservoir formations, and, if this salt layer is too old, it can become a gypsum bed layer. The structural and stratigraphic geology of the Perdido Fold Belt Area is very complicated, increasing the difficulties of the drilling activities in the zone.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Drilling Difficulties of the Deepwater Blocks</title><p>Compared to the shallow water area, the main drilling difficulties in the deepwater zone in the Gulf of Mexico are as follows:</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Obvious Geological Disaster of Shallow Stratum and Great Drilling Difficulty of Surface Layer</title><p>For the deepwater blocks in the Gulf of Mexico, the seafloor relief is rugged, the water bottom fluid and the seabed are unstable. Within 1500 m under the mud surface, the probability of the existence of shallow gas and gas hydrates is high. These unstable factors pose a threat to the surface layer drilling to a large extent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Shallow gas: the undisturbed structure of the layer under the mud surface may be destroyed and the effective formation pressure could be reduced. In the surface layer operation, if the shallow gas is encountered during the drilling, the wellhead would collapse or blow out and other high potential risks may be caused.</p><p>Hydrate: in the surface layer operation, due to the change of gradient of pressure between the seafloor sediment and upper stratum, the formation cavitation pressure and bursting pressure space ratio is small, the well leakage, collapse, well kick or even jamming risks greatly rise.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Narrow Density Window, High-Risk Coefficient during the Drilling Cycle</title><p>With the continuous increase of water depth, the formation fracture pressure gradient decreases. Therefore, the window between the formation pore pressure gradient and formation fracture pressure gradient is very narrow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref4">4</xref>]. According to the actual drilling example of a deepwater block in the Gulf of Mexico, obvious changes may take place in several hundred meters with regard to the formation pressure coefficient. It raises a tougher requirement for the mud system. Once the treatment is improper, the well leakage or even blowout may easily occur. At present, the common technology in the Gulf of Mexico is the lowering of the multi-layer casing. However, while the risk is avoided, the number of bottom hole assemblies required for drilling is increased; resulting in a great increase in drilling costs.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Salt Gypsum Bed Drilling</title><p>In the area of the deepwater block of the Gulf of Mexico, there are tremendous salt layers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). According to the exploration of deepwater blocks in the Gulf of Mexico which belongs to the USA, some salt layers could be up to 6100 m thick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref1">1</xref>]. The deepwater blocks of the Gulf of Mexico in the Mexico region have not been developed on a large scale. When PEMEX carries out the exploration, it has discovered the salt layer. Many reservoirs are under the salt layer. During the drilling, the drilling of the salt layer is inevitable, which poses a great challenge to the drilling operations.</p><p>Since the salt body density is fixed (the formation apparent density gradually increases as the pressure coefficient increases), the salt body density is lower than the formation apparent density. As the salt body moves upwards, the fracturing rubble zone at the salt bottom or on the salt body side is caused. The cavitation pressure, fracture gradient and fissure of the formation cannot be quantitatively forecast, so, high well risks control is necessary.</p><p>When the salt body is encountered, due to the wriggle of the salt body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref1">1</xref>], the salt body reversely intrudes into the borehole. Under the high temperature and high-pressure conditions, the reverse intrusion into the borehole is often faster, leading to the jamming risk.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Tough Mud and Well Cementing Fluid Requirements</title><p>The change of temperature gradient of deepwater operations is great. Generally, the seafloor temperature is 3˚C - 5˚C, and it could be lower than 0˚C in some areas. Before the arrival at the formation, the drilling mud or well-cementing fluid will undergo a process of obvious temperature decrease. Consequently, adverse effects may be left on the drilling fluid, such as a great increment of the viscosity and jelling. Besides, in a low-temperature environment, gas hydrate may easily occur, and icing or even pipeline blocking may easily happen too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref5">5</xref>]. Since the change of formation pressure coefficient is obvious, tougher requirements are raised for the mud. Under different formation pressure coefficients, the pressure inside and outside the borehole should be balanced, to guarantee the stability of the well wall. The low bursting pressure gradient and possible abnormal high-pressure formation need tougher requirements for the well cementing.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Analysis of Concrete Case</title><p>Based on the abovementioned operation difficulties, with one of two wells, namely, XXX 1 and XXX 1DL, besides #1 Block N from CNOOC as an example, reference is provided for the development of CNOOC’s deepwater blocks in the future.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Introduction to Basic Data of XXX 1 Well</title><p>The operator of the XXX 1 well is PEMEX, drilled using the Deepwater Drilling Platform BICENTENARIO. XXX 1 well is in the north of the Gulf of Mexico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) and it is 178 km away from Tamaulipas. It is adjacent to the border with the USA in the north, connected with Kamay and Pegaso in the east, and the Perdido Fold Belt in the west. It is parallel to Northern Latitude 24˚30' in the south and it is close to Silvertip, Tobago, Trident and Great White oilfields of the USA. The water depth of the area is 2535 m, the design total depth of the well is 6224 m, the final drilled well depth is 6119 m, and the drilling time was 143 days. The seafloor temperature is 5˚C, and the maximum bottom hole temperature is 146˚C.</p><p>Refer to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> for the analysis of formation lithology of XXX 1 Well.</p><p>In order to effectively avoid the geological risks and effectively balance the formation pressure coefficient, the well depth structure and casing procedure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) of the well have been optimized, and the structure of 7 different casings has been designed. Within 1500 m under the mud surface, 4 different casings are used. In particular, at 3050 m - 3450 m, the pressure change is considerable, requiring a mud density between a range of 1.05 - 1.70 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, being too obvious the pressure increase, and it is especially important to increase the number of casings of the well structure. At the same time, the multi-layer casing can favorably avoid the risk of intrusion of the salt gypsum bed into the borehole (for the deepwater blocks of the Gulf of Mexico, the salt gypsum bed is normally present in the oilfields near to the border between the USA and Mexico in most cases). The advantages of large-time drilling drill bits are as follows: when the complexities are encountered and the drilling of the borehole of such stage is finished in advance, 1 - 2 conventional casings could be added to the well structure, and the geological risk is effectively isolated.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Drilled geology and stratum of XXX 1 well</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stratum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Vertical Depth (calculate from sea level)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lithology</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Cenozoic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sea Bottom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2535 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Offshore clay</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleistocene-Plio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2655 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fine particle and poorly cemented sandstone, poor classified bioclastic rock and soft-semi-hard shale, some sandy and calcareous stones</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper Miocene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2955 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-hard plastic shale, slight calcareous and squamose structure, fine particle sandstone lamination and shale matrix calcareous bonding</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper Eocene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3170 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fine-grain shale and calcareous sandstone stromatolite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Eocene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3800 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soft-semi-hard shale, sandy and calcareous stones, fine sandstone and sandstone of calcareous matrix stromatolite in some places.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Eocene/Wilcox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4130 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandstone and shale and fine grain gravel stromatolite is formed by anorthosite, metamorphic, sedimentary and auxiliary minerals (target layer)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper Paleocene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4675 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium shale layer to well cemented fine-grain sandstone layer</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paleocene/Whopper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5670 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderately classified fine sandstone (target layer)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6195 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Well depth structure of XXX 1 Well</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Casing Diameter (Inch)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Drill Bit Diameter (Inch)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interval Depth (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fluid Category</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26'' &#215; 33''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2564 - 2664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seawater mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26'' &#215; 33''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2664 - 3050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seawater mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3050 - 3450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seawater mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 - 1.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12&#188;'' &#215; 22''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3450 - 3900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil base mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17 - 1.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13⅝''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12&#188;'' &#215; 16&#189;''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3900 - 4700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil base mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20 - 1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11⅞''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12&#188;'' &#215; 14&#190;''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4700 - 5300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil base mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 - 1.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9⅞''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10⅝'' &#215;12&#188;''</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5300 - 6224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil base mud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 - 1.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Drilling Operations Implementation and Problems</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. 36-In Pipe Adopts the Conventional Ejection Lowering Technology of Deepwater Operations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref6">6</xref>]</title><p>In the pipe string, the conventional bottom hole assembly is lowered, and the drill bit is 4 - 6 cm outside the pipe. The mud ejected from the drill bit directly returns from the pipe to the wellhead and then it is discharged, the annular frictional coefficient is reduced, and it enters the formation under the pipe dead weight and bit pressure effect. After the operation is completed, it is not required to cement the well, so the loss and wellhead sinking due to the well cementing are prevented, and the drilling day work expenses are saved economically.</p><p>Casing procedure: 28 in &amp; 22 in.</p><p>Bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 26 in + RSS 11 in + Motor 9&#189; in + stabilizers 25&#190; in + PWD 9&#189; in + stabilizers 9&#189; in, drill collar 9&#189; I.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. 28 in &amp; 22 in Casing and 26 in Borehole Bottom Hole Assembly</title><p>Casing procedure: 28 in &amp; 22 in.</p><p>Bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 26 in + RSS 11 in with stabilizers 25&#190; in + stabilizers 9&#189; &#215; 26 in + hole opener Reamer 22 &#215; 33 in + MWD/APWD/LWD 9 in + drill collar 9&#189; in + drill collar 8 in.</p><p>The reaming while drilling technology has been used in these two well sections, so as to increase the casing structure and avoid the downhole risk due to the change of pressure gradient.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. 18 in Casing and 12&#188; in Bottom Hole Assembly</title><p>Casing procedure: 18 in.</p><p>1<sup>st</sup> bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 12&#188; in + RSS + APWD + MWD + LWD, stabilizers 12 in, concentric hole opener 15 in, hydraulic hole opener 22 in, drill collars 8 in, Jars 8 in.</p><p>LWD includes acoustic wave, resistivity, gamma, density, and the like. The reaming while drilling technology is used as well.</p><p>2<sup>nd</sup> bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 18⅛ in, stabilizers 9&#189; &#215; 18⅛ in, Rhino Reamer hole opener 22 in, drill collars 9&#189; in, stabilizers 9&#189; &#215; 17&#189; in, Jars 8 in.</p><p>The pigging drilling rig is used in the 2<sup>nd</sup> bottom hole assembly.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_4"><title>4.2.4. 13⅝ in Casing and 12&#188; in &amp; 17&#189; in Bottom Hole Assembly</title><p>1<sup>st</sup> bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 12&#188; in + RSS with stabilizers 12⅛ in + APWD/MWD/Sonic/SADN/GR/Resistivity LWD 8 in, stabilizers 12 in, hole opener 15 in, drill collars 9&#189; in, stabilizers 9&#189; &#215; 16 in, bottom filter 9 in, drill collars 8 in, Jars 8 in. In this section, at 4080 m, 4137 m and 4230 m, the coring operation is carried out.</p><p>2<sup>nd</sup> bottom hole assembly: drilling bit 17&#189; in + RSS + APWD/MWD/LWD.</p><p>For this well section, in order to match the drilling coring operation, 12&#188; in bottom hole assembly is used for the first drilling. After the drilling is finished, the large size 17&#189; in bottom hole assembly is used, so as to play the role of pigging and reaming. Meanwhile, LWD equipment is used again, to determine the target position, and then the wireline logging operation is carried out.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_5"><title>4.2.5. 11⅞ in &amp; 9⅞ in Casing and Bottom Hole Assembly</title><p>RSS + LWD bottom hole assembly is continuously used in these two well sections.</p><p>However, at 5554 m in the drilling of the well, since pulling out of the hole was too fast, the swabbing effect happened, having a lot of silt rock drill cuttings in the vibrating screen. In the meantime, pulling out of the hole at the bottom is difficult. It is inferred that the downhole collapse occurs. The lifting hanging load is increased, the torque is increased, and the large displacement circulation is performed to remove the jamming. During the circulation, many silt rock drill cuttings are still seen. In order to guarantee the subsequent drilling, the drilling rig is pulled to the wellhead, and the casing is lowered. A casing level in the well structure is added for 8&#189; in well section, and the drilling is finished at 6119 m.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Application of Directional Well and Logging While Drilling Equipment</title><sec id="s4_3_1"><title>4.3.1. RSS</title><p>Except for the surface layer, the rotary steering (directional well equipment) has been used in other well sections of XXX 1 Well. Such equipment favorably controls the borehole track. The drilled borehole is more regular than the borehole drilled by the motor. At the same time, the near-bit gamma may be favorable to know the to-be-drilled formation, and the formation could be pre-interpreted.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_2"><title>4.3.2. LWD</title><p>LWD tools of the well include pressure measurement while drilling (annular), resistivity, gamma, neutron, density, acoustic wave and other high-end LWD devices. Primarily, the device of pressure measurement while drilling (annular) measures the annular pressure. Due to the deepwater operation, the change of formation pressure is great. As the water depth increases, the problem of change of pressure becomes prominent. The annular pressure measurement system while drilling may be favorable to detect the pressure change in the annulus, the drilling fluid could be adjusted in advance, and major downhole risks, such as well kick, blowout and jamming, are prevented.</p><p>Through the LWD equipment, the formation evaluation is improved, so as to pre-interpret the formation lithology, know the formation porosity and permeability, and pre-identify the reservoir.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Salt Gypsum Bed</title><p>Even if no salt gypsum bed is encountered in this well, this area is close to the border between the USA and Mexico. Through the optimization of bottom hole assembly, RSS, reaming while drilling technology, drill bit selection and the like, the salt gypsum bed event is prevented in this well.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Drilling Fluid and Well Cementing</title><p>The water depth of the Well is 2535 m, and the seafloor temperature is 3˚C. In order to reduce the effects on the drilling due to the temperature decrease, and prevent the obvious change of rheological property of drilling fluid, the manifold is enveloped by the insulating layer, so as to reduce the jelling of drilling fluid, constrain the gas hydrate generation and avoid the manifold blocking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112780-ref7">7</xref>]. In terms of casing well cementing, considering the seafloor low-temperature effect and the effect of low formation fracture pressure gradient, low-density cement is used, the setting time of cement is reduced, the internal and external pressure is balanced, and the effective well cementing is achieved.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The deepwater drilling technology in the Gulf of Mexico is increasingly matured. However, as CNOOC just set foot in this sea area, there is a huge challenge. How to cope with the shallow geological disaster, narrow density window and salt gypsum bed which may easily occur during the well drilling process and how to meet the fluid requirement of the drilling mud and cementing fluid, how to optimize the well depth structure, bottom hole assembly and design the suitable drilling mud, well-cementing system and other key steps are the targets to achieve a successful operation. Through the analysis of the actual drilling experience of TRI&#211;N 1 well, main risk points and control measures in the operation of deepwater block in the Gulf of Mexico are analyzed. By the design scheme, the potential risks are effectively avoided. The reasonable experience in the drilling of deepwater blocks in the Gulf of Mexico is summarized, and a road to success with referential significance is provided for the development of #1 Block and #4 Block of CNOOC subsequently.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zheng, Y., Liu, J.S. and Wang, X. (2021) Analysis on Well Drilling Example of Deepwater Block in the Gulf of Mexico. Open Journal of Yangtze Gas and Oil, 6, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojogas.2021.64016</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.112780-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Han</surname><given-names> Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Oil and Gas Distribution Characteristics and Exploration Potential of Deepwater Area in the Basin of the Gulf of Mexico</article-title><source> Petroleum Geology &amp; Experiment</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 473</fpage>-<lpage>478</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y. (2014) Research Feature and Development Trend of Deepwater Oil and Gas Exploration in the Gulf of Mexico., Marine Geological Frontiers, 30, 27-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willson, S.M., Edwards, S., Heppard, P.D., et al. (2003) Wellbore Stability Challenges in the Deep Water, Gulf of Mexico: Case History Examples from the Pompano Field. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 5-8 October 2003, Paper Number: SPE-84266-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/84266-MS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yin, Z.M. (2011) Risk Analysis and Coping Strategy of Deepwater Drilling Operation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hou</surname><given-names> F.X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Critical Technology and Equipment of Offshore Deepwater Drilling</article-title><source> Oil Field Equipment</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Technical Status and Development Trend of Deepwater Oil Drilling</article-title><source> Oil Drilling &amp; Production Technology</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 10</fpage>-<lpage>13</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112780-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names> X.X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Drilling Practice of Deepwater Rock Gypsum Formation in the Gulf of Mexico</article-title><source> Oil Drilling &amp; Production Technology</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 99</fpage>-<lpage>102</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>