<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2021.1210072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-112566</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Molecular Characterization Using Microsatellites of Bambara Nut (&lt;i&gt;Vigna subterranea&lt;/i&gt; [L] Verdcourt) Landraces Cultivated in Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diane</surname><given-names>Judicaëlle Kambou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hervé</surname><given-names>Nandkangre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adjima</surname><given-names>Ouoba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdou</surname><given-names>Kader Congo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’Golo</surname><given-names>Moussa Konate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wend-Pagnangdé</surname><given-names>Marie Serge Félicien Zida</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nerbéwendé</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahamadou</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahama</surname><given-names>Ouedraogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Département de Productions Végétales, Laboratoire de Génétique et de Biotechnologies Végétales, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Centre Universitaire de Ziniaré, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Université Norbert ZONGO, UFR ST (Sciences et Technologies), Koudougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre Universitaire de Tenkodogo/Université Thomas SANKARA, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, UFR-SVT, Ecole Doctorale Sciences et Technologies, Laboratoire Biosciences, Equipe Génétique et Amélioration des Plantes, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1119</fpage><lpage>1128</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Voandzou is a seed legume cultivated in Burkina Faso with significant nutritional potential. The objective of this study was to assess the genetic diversity of Bambara nut cultivated in Burkina Faso using microsatellite markers. For the study, fifteen SSRs markers were used for molecular characterization of 90 Bambara nut landraces from three agro-climatic zones of Burkina Faso. All markers were 100% polymorphic with an average value of 4.81 for effective alleles. The polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.654 to 0.867 with a mean of 0.775. Dendrogram classified the accessions in four mixed groups independently of the three agro-climatic zones. This distribution is consistent with the results on the agro-morphological characterization of the same landraces. This information was served as a basic model for breeding and conservation programs of 
  <em>V. subterranea</em> in Burkina Faso.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bambara Nut</kwd><kwd> Landraces</kwd><kwd> Genetics Diversity</kwd><kwd> SSR Markers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>Abstract</title><p>Voandzou is a seed legume cultivated in Burkina Faso with significant nutritional potential. The objective of this study was to assess the genetic diversity of Bambara nut cultivated in Burkina Faso using microsatellite markers. For the study, fifteen SSRs markers were used for molecular characterization of 90 Bambara nut landraces from three agro-climatic zones of Burkina Faso. All markers were 100% polymorphic with an average value of 4.81 for effective alleles. The polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.654 to 0.867 with a mean of 0.775. Dendrogram classified the accessions in four mixed groups independently of the three agro-climatic zones. This distribution is consistent with the results on the agro-morphological characterization of the same landraces. This information was served as a basic model for breeding and conservation programs of V. subterranea in Burkina Faso.</p><p>Keywords:</p><p>Bambara Nut, Landraces, Genetics Diversity, SSR Markers</p><disp-formula id="scirp.112566-formula2"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1410169x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Bambara nut (Vigna subterranea [L] Verdcourt) is one of the most important legumes in Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref1">1</xref>]. Local population uses it as food and medicine for diseases treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref2">2</xref>]. Bambara nut seeds are rich in many components such as protein, carbohydrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref3">3</xref>] and have high antioxidant activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref4">4</xref>]. The plant has a strong ability to adapt to poorly watered and not very fertile soils thanks to drought tolerance and its capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref5">5</xref>]. In Burkina Faso, Bambara nut has an economical importance for the producers and the traders as cash crop and generate substantial incomes for households [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref6">6</xref>]. Despite its importance country wide, there is a lack of high yielding cultivars to increase Bambara nut production and productivity. Improvement of this species will be of great benefit for producers, traders and population.</p><p>Therefore, it is very important to improve the level of knowledge of the genetic diversity within Bambara nut accessions in Burkina Faso. Few works have been realized on genetic variability of Bambara nut cultivated in Burkina Faso. Their studies were based on morphological markers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref7">7</xref>] which reported a significant agro-morphological variability. However, morphological markers, although effective and easy to study, can give a biased estimate of genetic diversity, as they could be influenced by environmental factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref8">8</xref>]. Molecular markers have become powerful tools in the assessment of genetic diversity compared to the conventional approach using phenotypic descriptors because they are independent of environmental factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref9">9</xref>]. The studies using molecular markers such as RAPD and SSRs were carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref11">11</xref>]. The microsatellite molecular markers used by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref11">11</xref>] on the same genetic material of V. subterranea were not very informative because they showed a low polymorphism and genetic diversity. This genetic material has also been studied using RAPD markers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref10">10</xref>]. Their authors reported moderate genetic diversity despite a high rate of polymorphism. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref12">12</xref>], the heterozygosity and the polymorphism information content (PIC) are two distinct values, which can be employed to determine the level of polymorphism in markers. RAPD molecular markers have the disadvantage of being dominant, difficult to reproduce and not transferable between species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref13">13</xref>]. Thus, a better estimate of the genetic diversity of Bambara nut requires suitable markers, which can provide information on the genetic diversity within this species. This study aims to contribute to a better knowledge of the level of diversity within 90 accessions of Bambara nut from three agro-climatic zones of Burkina Faso using microsatellite markers for conservation and breeding purpose.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>The plant material consisted of 90 Bambara nut cultivarsfrom Burkina Faso. Most of the accessions were collected from the producers in Sahelian zone (18), Sudanian zone (17), and Sudan-Sahelian zone (49). Six varieties were obtained from National Institute for the Environment and Agricultural Research gene bank (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Origin of landraces</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Origin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accessions</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >INERA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KVS 235, KVS 235 100 GY, KVS 246-1, KVS 246-2, KVS 246-3, Life 16-141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sahelian zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E 105b, E 108, E 110a, E 110b, E 111a, E 114, E 117, E 118, E 119, E 12, E 124a, E 124b, E 124c, E 125, E 126, E 13, E 59, E 61a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan-Sahelian zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E 01, E 03, E 04, E 09, E 103a, E 103b, E 105a, E 107, E 111b, E 131, E 132, E 16a, E 48, E 49, E 51, E 53, E 56a, E 56b, E 56c, E 58, E 61b, E 62a, E 62b, E 62c, E 65, E 70b, E 71, E 72, E 75, Nob-Loc, E 76a, E 76b, E 78a, E 83a, E 83b, E 88b, E 89a, E 89b, E90, E 92, E 93b, E 94, E 95a, E 95b, E 97, E 98, ED8, KAYA 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudanian zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E 101b, E 123, E 130, E 16b, E 20, E 22, E 23, E 25, E 26, E 27, E 28, E 44, E 76c, E 78b, E 83c, E 86, E 88a</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>2.2. Microsatellite Markers</title><p>Fifteen SSR markers were used for molecular characterization due to their high polymorphism revealed in previous studies on 35 genotypes including 21 accessions from IITA (Nigeria), while 12 were from the University of Nottingham stocks and 2 were sourced from Botswana using 75 SSR markers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref14">14</xref>]. The characteristics of these markers are mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>2.3. DNA Extraction</title><p>The accessions were sowed on seedling plates. Fourteen days after sowing, a piece of young leaf was removed with a pair of scissors and placed on FTA card with the accession number. The sheets were covered with plastic film and crushed using a laboratory porcelain pestle in order to obtain an imprint on the FTA cards. The cards bearing the paper were air-dried for 24 h at room temperature and kept in a desiccator away from any element liable to degrade DNA. At the end, disk of 2 mm in diameter was taken for each sample from the cards using a paintbrush. They have been placed in “Eppendorf” tubes at the rate of five disks per tube. Five disks of each tube are washed twice in 1000 μl alcohol 70˚ for five minutes and then rinsed twice also with the same amount of TE buffer (Tris-EDTA) during this same time. The discs containing the DNA were then dried at room temperature and kept at −20˚C for gradual use in PCR.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>2.4. PCR Amplification</title><p>PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 20 μl of PreMix (Bioneer corp, Republic of Korea), 2 μl of each primer (1 &#181;M) (Integrated DNA Technologies,) (foward-reverse) and one disk (2 mm) of FTA card containing genomic DNA in BIO-RAD thermocycler (BioRad MyCycler PCR System, Texas, United States). A program of initial denaturation phase at 94˚C (5 min) followed by 35 consecutive cycles of a denaturation at 94˚C (30 s), a hybridization of Primers at 44˚C - 51˚C (1 min), stretch at 72˚C (1 min) has been launched. A final elongation at 72˚C (10 min) followed by cooling to 10˚C. The amplification products were subjected to electrophoresis at 150 V using 2% agarose gel in which 7.5 μl</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> SSR markers used and their characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Loci</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sequence (5'-3')</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size (bp)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: AGGAGCAGAAGCTGAAGCAG</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >46.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CCAATGCTTTTGAACCAACA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: CCGGAACAGAAAACAACAAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >47.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CGTCGATGACAAAGAGCTTG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: AGGCAAAAACGTTTCAGTTC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >46.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: TTCATGAAGGTTGAGTTTGTCA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: CGCTCATTTTAACCAGACCTC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >46.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CAAACAAACCAACGGAATGA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: AATGCAAGATTTTGGCTTGG</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CCCACTCAAACCATACACCA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: TTTACCTGAACCCCTTAACC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >49.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: AGGCTTCACTCACGGGTATG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: ACGCTTCTTCCCTCATCAGA</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >48.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: TATGAATCCAGTGCGTGTGA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: CCGATGGACGGGTAGATATG</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >49.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: GCAACCCTCTTTTTCTGCAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Primer 48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: TACCTGCATTCGGGACAGTT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >48.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: TTCACTCTTTCTTGATCACATGC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G33AB4-D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: TGCTTCTTCAAGGAGGAAGTAAGT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >50.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: ACAAACATACGCACAACAGAGAAT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G196AB4-D5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: CCACGTTCTGGTTGTGAGTAGATA</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >50.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: GTGCTTTCAGACCATTACTTGCTT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G180B2-D11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: GAGGAAATAACCAAACAAACC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >44.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CTTACGCTCAATTTTAACCAGACCT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G240-7-B2-D12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: TTTTGTTGTTGTATGAATCCAGTG</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CCTCATCAGACGCTCATCATT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G240-9-B2-D14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: GAACGAAGCCAGGATAATGATAGT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >49.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: CGAAAGCGACAACTCACTACTAAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G358B2-D15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F: TGACGGAGGCTTAATAGATTTTTC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R: GACTAGACACTTCAACAGCCAATG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of Ethidium Bromide (BET) during 1 h 30 min in 0.5x Tris Borate EDTA (TBE) buffer. The wells were loaded with 10 μl of PCR product in the presence of a marker of molecular weight varying from 25 bp to 600 bp. The migration gel was read in UV light and then was photographed for evaluation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>The molecular data obtained from the binary coding made it possible to determine genetic diversity within accessions with genetic parameters such as number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), polymorphism (P), expected heterozygosity (He). They were determined with the GenALEx 6.501 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref15">15</xref>]. The polymorphism information content (PIC) was estimated using Genetix 4.04 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref16">16</xref>]. Aptitude of the different loci to structure diversity between the accessions was carried out using the DARwin v 5.0.158 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref17">17</xref>] through the construction of a dendrogram from dissimilarity matrix by the “Neighbour Joinning” method.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>3. Result</title><p>The molecular data obtained from the binary coding made it possible to determine genetic diversity within accessions with genetic parameters such as number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), polymorphism (P), expected heterozygosity (He). They were determined with the GenALEx 6.501 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref15">15</xref>]. The polymorphism information content (PIC) was estimated using Genetix 4.04 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref16">16</xref>]. Aptitude of the different loci to structure diversity between the accessions was carried out using the DARwin v 5.0.158 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref17">17</xref>] through the construction of a dendrogram from dissimilarity matrix by the “Neighbour Joinning” method.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>3.1. Genetic Diversity of Vigna subterranea</title><p>The results of the analysis of genetic diversity using 15 SSR markers are in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. One hundred and one alleles in total were detected. Each primer revealed a</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Estimation of genetic diversity of 90 Bambara nut landraces using 15 SSR markers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Loci</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ne</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >He</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PIC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.788</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.788</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.777</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.812</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.977</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.892</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.654</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.654</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.724</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.724</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer 48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.868</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.867</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.699</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.698</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.931</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.895</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.743</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.743</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.761</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.857</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.443</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.845</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.844</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.816</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.775</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Na: number of allele, Ne: effective allele, P: polymorphism, He: expected heterozygosity, PIC: polymorphic information content.</p><p>polymorphism (P) of 100%. The number of alleles (Na) ranged from 4 (Primer 33) to 12 (D14) with an average of 6.73 alleles per locus. The total number of effective alleles was 72 with an average of 4.816. Expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0.654 for Primer 33 to 0.868 for primer 48 with an average of 0.775 alleles per locus. The least discriminating marker was primer 33 with a Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) value of 0.654 and the most discriminating marker was primer 48 with a PIC value of 0.867.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>3.2. Genetic Diversity Organization</title><p>The dendrogram base on the “Neighbour-Joining” method revealed four genetic groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The distribution of accessions in groups took place independently of agro-climatic zones. Group I gathers 28 accessions including 17 from Sudan-Sahelian zone, 08 from Sudanian zone and 03 from Sahelian zone. Group II contains 22 accessions including 13 from Sudan-Sahelian zone, 04 from Sudanian zone, 03 from Sahelian zone and 02 from INERA gene bank. The group III comprised of 29 accessions including 15 from Sudan-Sahelian zone, 07 from Sahelian zone, 04 from INERA gene bank and 03 from Sudanian zone. Group IV gathers 11 accessions including 04 from Sudan-Sahelian zone, 02 from Sudanian zone and 05 from Sahelian zone.</p><p>The genetic parameters of the different genetic groups are scored in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Diversity parameters of four genetic groups of Bambara nut from Burkina Faso</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ne</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >He</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.798</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.52%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.595</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.96%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.78%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.477</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Na: number of allele, Ne: effective allele, P: polymorphism, He: expected heterozygosity, PIC: polymorphic information content.</p><p>Group I gave a number of alleles of 4.067, a polymorphism rate and expected heterozygosity of 82.52% and 0.595, respectively. For Group II, the number of alleles was 3.733, a polymorphism of 78.50% and expected heterozygosity of 0.566. Group III gave a number of allele of 5.133, the greatest effective allele and respectively a polymorphism and expected heterozygosity of 92.96% and 0.720. For Group IV, the number of allele was 2.400 with a lowest number of effective allele, a polymorphism and expected heterozygosity of 65.78% and 0.477.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Analysis of Bambara nut accessions with 15 SSR DNA markers identified 101 alleles in this study with an average of 6.73 alleles per locus. This result showed an important level of diversity within the Bambara nut collection. These values are higher than the previous results reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref18">18</xref>] on 18 Bambara nut landraces using 10 SSR marker, which had 52 alleles and an average of 5.20 alleles per locus. The values of PIC, which ranged from 0.654 to 0.867 show those SSR markers set used, were very discriminating. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref19">19</xref>] reported that molecular markers are highly informative if the PIC value is greater than 0.5. The most polymorphic primers were D14 and Primer 48 with respective values 0.857 and 0.867. However, these results differ from those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref11">11</xref>] who showed 0.174 (primer B2D15FR) to 0.435 (primer 4FR) with an average of 0.298 per primer. The microsatellite markers used to characterize the same collection of V. subterranea were weakly are not very discriminating. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref20">20</xref>], factors such as population size, origin of landraces, type of markers used and human community’s impacts could influence the level of polymorphism within a population. In this study, results would be due to the use of a higher number of markers, which were in addition selected for their high rate of polymorphism according to a screening of 24 accessions of Bambara nut by 68 SSRs carried out by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref14">14</xref>]. Therefore, there is genetic diversity within the Bambara nut cultivated in Burkina Faso. The SSR markers set used in this study could be used for efficient management, conservation, and utilization of Bambara nut germplasm. The allelic diversity explained by expected heterozygosity (He) varied from 0.654 to 0.868 respectively for Primer 33 and Primer 48 with an average of 0.775. These values are similar to those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref21">21</xref>] who found values ranged from 0.626 to 0.863 with and an average of 0.787. A moderate diversity for expected heterozygosity was reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref10">10</xref>] on 92 landraces of V. subterranea screened with 17 RAPD markers. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref22">22</xref>] obtained moderate diversity with an average of expected heterozygosity of 0.64 in 604 genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) using 36 SSR markers. High value of expected heterozygosity reflects a significant genetic diversity of Bambara nut landraces studied.</p><p>Bambara nut accessions were divided into four clusters. This gathering could reflect an existence of significant genetic diversity in the study population. The different genetic groups obtained are composed of individuals from all agro-climatic zones. The mixture of accessions from different agro-climatic zones shows that the gathering of accessions is not based on their origin. These results corroborate those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref11">11</xref>] which led to this same organisation. This weak genetic differentiation between accessions of different climatic zones could be explained by seed exchanges during migration of population and social cultural activities. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref21">21</xref>] reported a distribution of Bambara nut accessions from seven geographic areas into seven groups independently of their geographic origins. On the other hand, the studies of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref23">23</xref>] on Bambara nut with AFLP markers showed that accessions were regrouped according to their origin when they are collected in isolated localities or very distant from each other. These differences are due to the ability of SSR markers to divide genotypes into smaller genetic groups than other marker systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref21">21</xref>]. The gathering of accessions in four genetic groups independent of agro-climatic zones has been reported by previous studies on the same genetic material with phenotypic markers in an agro-morphological diversity study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112566-ref7">7</xref>]. The selective pressure of genotypes and adaptations to the environment are sources of genetic modification.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Analysis of genetic diversity using SSRs markers revealed a significant genetic diversity of Vigna subterranea cultivated in Burkina Faso. The SSR markers used exhibited a high polymorphism and made it possible to structure the diversity into four genetic groups independent of their origin. This study allowed a better understanding of the structuring of genetic variability. The knowledge of the genetic diversity of V. subterranea available in Burkina Faso and the different profiles of this genetic diversity would serve in breeding and varietal improvement programs for this crop. Bambara nut is a growing crop and many studies remain to be done to enhance both production and economic profitability.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to Mcknight Foundation for funding this research work through the Mcknight 18-097 project. The farmers also are highly acknowledged for providing major part of accessions used in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.112566-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouédraogo, M., Ouédraogo, J.T., Tignéré, J.B., Balma, D., Dabiré, B.C., Konaté, G. (2008) Characterization and Evaluation of Accessions of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranean (L.) Verdc.) from Burkina Faso. Sciences &amp; Nature, 5, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.4314/scinat.v5i2.42164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brink, M., Grubben, G.J.H., Belay, G. and Agrooh Bioscience Translations (2006) Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale 1: Céréales et légumes secs. Fondation PROTA, Wageningen; Backhuys Publishers, Leiden; CTA, Wageningen, 328 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2016) Légumineuses: Des graines nutritives pour un avenir durable. Année Internationale des légumineuses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 12-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbaiogaou A., Héma A., Ouédraogo M., Palé E., Naitormbaide M., Mahamout, Nacro M. (2013) Etude comparative des teneurs en polyphénols et en antioxydants totaux d’extraits de graines de 44 variétés de voandzou (Vigna subterranea (L) Verdcourt). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7, 861-871. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v7i2.41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, M. (1989) Amélioration de la production du voandzou au Sénégal par la fixation biologique de l’azote. Cahier d’information de l’Institut Sénégalais de recherche agricole, 3, 7 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadembèga, S. (2016) Productions vivrières et sécurité alimentaire au Burkina Faso: cas du voandzou dans trois communes des trois zones agro-écologiques. Dipl&amp;#244;me de Master 2, Université Catholique de l’Afrique de l’Ouest, Bobo Dioulasso, 90 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kambou, D.J., Nandkangré, H., Ouoba, A., Konaté, M.N., Sawadogo, N., Ouédraogo, M. and Sawadogo, M. (2020) Agro Morphological Characterization of Bambara Nut Accessions [Vigna subterranea (L) Verdcourt] from Burkina Faso. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 153, 15727-15744. https://doi.org/10.35759/JABs.153.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lallemand, J. (2004) Evaluation de la diversité génétique d’espèces cultivées. HDR, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, 450 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agarwal, N., Liu, H., Tang, L. and Yu, P.S. (2008) Identifying the Influential Bloggers in a Community. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Palo Alto, 11-12 February 2008, 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341559</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konaté, M.N., Nandkangré, H., Ouoba, A., Zida, S.F., Ouédraogo, M., Sawadogo, N., Nadembega, S., Congo, A.K. and Sawadogo, M. (2018) Genetic Diversity of Bambara Groundnut Accessions from Burkina Faso Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Marker. International Journal of Current Research, 10, 74106-74111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouoba, A., Zida, S.F., Ouédraogo, M., Nandkangre, H., Ouédraogo, M.H., Nanéma, K.R., Sawadogo, N., Zida, E.P., Konaté, M.N., Congo, A.K., Soalla, R.W. and Sawadogo, M. (2017) Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt) Landraces in Burkina Faso Using Microsatellite Markers (SSR). Agricultural Science Research Journal, 7, 96-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shete, S., Tiwari, H. and Elston, R.C. (2000) On Estimating the Heterozygosity and Polymorphism Information Content Value, Theoretical Population Biology, 57, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2000.1452</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, M.P., Dingkuhn, M., Aluko, G.K. and Semon, M. (1997) Interspecific O. sativa L. x O. glaberrima Seeud: Progenies in Upland Rice Improvement. Euphytica, 92, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002969932224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molosiwa, O.O., Aliyu, S., Stadler, F., Mayes, K., Massawe, F., Kilian, A., et al. (2015) SSR Marker Development, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of Bambara Groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] Landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62, 1225-1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0226-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peakall, R. and Smouse, P.E. (2012) GenAlex 6.5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research—An Update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. and Bonhomme, F. (2002) Genetix 4.04, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. http://www.univ–montp2.fr/*genetix/genetix/genetix.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perrier, X. and Jacquemoud-Collet, J.P. (2006) DARwin Software. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Basu, S., Mayes, S., Davey, M., Jeremy, A., Azam-Ali, S.N., Mithen, R. and Pasquet, R.S. (2007) Inheritance of Domestication Traits in Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc). Euphytica, 157, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9396-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M. and Davis, R.W. (1980) Construction of Genetic Linkage Map in Man Using Fragment Length Polymorphism. American of Journal Human Genetics, 32, 314-331.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, A., Kesari, V., Satyanarayana, V.M., Parida, A., Mitra, S. and Rangan, L. (2013) Genetic Diversity in Ecotypes of the Scarce Wild Medicinal Crop Zingiber moran Revealed by ISSR and AFLP Marker Analysis and Chromosome Number Assessment. Plant Biosystems, 149, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.795197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed, M.S., Shimelis, H.A. and Laing, M.D. (2019) Genetic Diversity of Bambara Groundnut Genotypes (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc.) Revealed by SSR Markers. Journal of Underutilized Legumes, 1, 169-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blair, W.M., Diaz, M.L., Buendia, F.H., Duque, M.C. (2009) Genetic Diversity, Seed Size Associations and Population Structure of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 119, 955-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1064-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112566-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntundu, W.H., Bach, I.C., Christiansen, J.L. and Andersen, S.B. (2004) Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Bambara Groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc] Landraces Using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) Markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 3, 220-225.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>