<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2021.129102</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-112142</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  High-Yielding and Carotenoid-Rich Clones Identification among Thirty-One Cassava Clones with Colored Flesh
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’Zue</surname><given-names>Boni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Coulibaly</surname><given-names>Idriss Koudous</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koffi</surname><given-names>Kouamé Guillaume</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Essis</surname><given-names>Brice Sidoine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dibi</surname><given-names>Konan Evrard Brice</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sie</surname><given-names>Raoul Sylvère</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Université Nangui Abrogoua, UFR Sciences de la Nature, Unité de Phytotechnie et Amélioration Génétique, Abidjan 02, 
C&amp;amp;#244te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA), Baouké, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1445</fpage><lpage>1458</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>31,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Cassava is the second most important food crop produced and consumed in C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire, after yam. White-fleshed varieties, which are low in total carotenoids, are widespread, while coloured-fleshed varieties (yellow to orange), carotenoid-rich, are rare. However, the consumption of carotenoid-rich cassava varieties could help to alleviate health problems related to vitamin A deficiency. This study aims to identify high agronomic performance, carotenoid-rich and versatile cassava varieties among 31 clones introduced from IITA. They were compared to three controls, Bocou2, Yac&#233; and Bonou2, according to agronomic and technological parameters. Results found that out of the 31 clones, six (I082425, I084157, I084563, I085894, I083774 and I070520) were more p
  roductive than the control Bocou2 (46.01 &#177; 14.88 t&amp;middot;ha<sup>-1</sup>); the clone I083774 had the highest yield (55.88 &#177; 6.16 t&amp;middot;ha
  <sup>-1</sup>). Twenty-one clones had dry matter contents, ranging from 37% to 41%, significantly similar to Yac&#233; control (42.70%). Thirteen clones had highest total carotenoid contents than the control Bocou2. Clones I084157 and I082425 recorded the highest total carotenoid contents with 17.57 &#177; 1.92 and 18.39 &#177; 1.19
   
  μg&amp;middot;g<sup>-1</sup> respectively. Overall 31 tested clones were fibrous to varying degrees while 27 clones had mild or neutral post-cooking flavours and 17 clones had poor cooking. The clone I084157 is the best compromise of agronomic and technological desired traits.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Manihot esculenta</kwd><kwd> Carotenoid-Rich</kwd><kwd> Coloured-Flesh Cassava</kwd><kwd> High Yied</kwd><kwd> Provitamin A</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cassava is one of the main food crops in tropical regions with annual world production of 277,808,759 tons in 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref1">1</xref>], of which 169,673,737 tons, or 61.1% of this production, is in Africa. Cassava is a perennial plant, mainly cultivated for its starchy tuberous roots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref2">2</xref>]. It is a food and industrial commodity that plays a very important role in food security and in the textile industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref3">3</xref>]. Cassava is the second largest source of food energy in some African countries where malnutrition problems are recurrent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, most of cassava is produced in the southern half of the country even if it’s grown in all regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref5">5</xref>]. In 2017, Ivorian cassava production was 5,000,667 tons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref1">1</xref>] and was the second largest food crop after yam. As a staple food in C&#244;te d’Ivoire, this crop is well integrated into several cropping systems. There are many derivatives (cassava semolina, placali, foutou, flour, starch, gari, etc.) and they are the object of internal trade, in the sub-region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref5">5</xref>] and outside Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>However, producers and consumers’ requirements (high yield, high dry matter content, starch quality and content, multipurpose uses) remain a challenge. In addition, most cultivated varieties are white or cream-flesh, with tuberous roots generally containing very few carotenoids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref7">7</xref>]. Cassava varieties with coloured flesh potentially rich in carotenoids are very poorly available and not well known by the population. Beta-carotene carotenoids are essential for the performance of multiple functions (normal functioning of vision and the immune system, growth and development, maintenance of epithelial cell integrity and reproduction) by vitamin A in humans. Vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of blindness in children and increases the risk of cancer, stunted growth in young people, various diseases and even death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref8">8</xref>]. To limit these constraints and health problems, the selection and production of cassava varieties rich in provitamin A, with high agronomic and technological interest are needful. To this end, a lot of work has been conducted at national and international level ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref11">11</xref>] etc.). Thus, high yielding coloured flesh cassava varieties with high carotenoid content have been identified. In 2014, CNRA, through its Root and Tuber Plant (RTP) program, introduced from IITA Ibadan new coloured flesh cassava clones under selection. An evaluation of the performance of these new coloured flesh cassava clones successively in stations and in farmers’ environment is therefore essential. The aim of this study is triple; to identify high-yielding, carotenoid-rich and versatile cassava varieties.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>The material consisted of 31 IITA coloured flesh clones and 3 control varieties (Yac&#233;, Bonoua2 and Bocou2). Bocou2 is a new improved variety introduced from IITA and selected by CNRA after a series of multi-local evaluations. It is yellow-flesh and good production potential (yields of around 32 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in station) and use in semolina. Yac&#233; is a white-flesh cultivar that is widespread in the southern region around Abidjan and is used in the manufacture of semolina and placali. It has a root production level of 25 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in station and a dry matter content (40%) that is appreciated by users. Bonoua2 (20 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in station), a white-flesh cultivar, is widespread in the western region of C&#244;te d’Ivoire and is used for the preparation of stew and foutou. It is sweet and has good culinary ability in water. The three varieties served as reference controls for yield and total carotenoid content (Bocou2), for dry matter content (Yac&#233;), for taste and cooking (Bonoua2).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Site</title><p>The study was conducted at the CNRA’s Station de Recherche sur les Cultures Vivri&#232;res (SRCV) in Bouak&#233; (7˚4'N and 5˚2'W), central C&#244;te d’Ivoire, in the Guinean savannah (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), where moderately desaturated ferralitic soils dominate. The rainfall regime is limited to two rainy seasons (April to July and September to October) and two dry seasons (August and November to March). The average annual rainfall is between 1100 and 1200 mm. The average temperature is 25.73˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref12">12</xref>] and the annual insolation duration is 2200 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Experimental Design</title><p>The assay was conducted in three replicates using the Lattice design. Each replication consisted of two blocks of 17 elementary plots that received 34 genotypes. Each plot had four lines of six plants. Spacing was 0.8 m between plants, 0.8 m between rows, 1.5 m between plots and 2 m between blocks. The land was cleared and machine plowed. The cuttings were planted horizontally to a depth at less than 10 cm. Maintenance consisted of replacing missing plants one month after planting and weeding. Subsequently, weeding was done on demand. The tuberous roots were harvested 12 months after planting.</p><p>Observations and measurements are focused on three agronomic and five technological traits.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Agronomic Parameters</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Incidence of Mites</title><p>The incidence is established, six months after planting, by the ratio of the number of plants attacked by mites to the total number of plants per plot. It is expressed as a percentage.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Severity of the Mites</title><p>The severity of mites attack was scored from 1 to 5 (1: no symptoms; 2: moderate damage, no reduction in leaf area, scattered chlorotic spots on young leaves; 3: severe chlorosis with slight reduction in leaf area; 4: severe chlorosis and significant reduction in leaf area of young shoots; 5: very severe chlorosis and significant reduction in leaf area and young shoots, generalized defoliation) of leaves and young shoots of each clone according to the formula:</p><p>Severity = (Σ Number of affected plants &#215; score)/Total number of plants.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Tuberous Root Yield</title><p>At harvest time, one year after planting, the tuberous roots of each clone per plot were weighed. This determined mass was reported in t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Technological Parameters</title><sec id="s2_5_1"><title>2.5.1. Dry Matter Content</title><p>The dry matter content was determined for 200 g samples of tuberous roots per clone. Four tuberous roots were randomly selected, peeled and cut into small slices. These samples were placed on aluminum foil and placed in an oven at 100˚C for 24 hours. The mass of dry matter obtained was related to the mass of fresh matter according to the formula:</p><p>Tms (%) = M &#215; 100/200; M: mass of the sample after drying (g).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5_2"><title>2.5.2. Total Carotenoid Content</title><p>The content was determined in the laboratory with an electronic device called iCheck Carotene. The method used is developed by IITA—iCheck™ Carotene. The test kit consists of a portable photometer and ready-to-use reagent bottles. Three tuberous roots (large, medium and small) taken at random from the total tuberous roots harvested from each clone were labelled, washed and then peeled and cut. A quantity of 5 g of the cut pieces were ground into a very fine paste in a porcelain mortar. Subsequently, 20 ml of distilled water was added to the sample during the grinding in the mortar until no particles remained on the porcelain pestle. The contents were poured into a flacon and made up to 25 ml and homogenised. Using a syringe, 0.4 ml of the suspension was sampled and injected into the reagent flacon (iEx Carotene). The flacon was shaken and left to stand for at least 5 min before measurement. The flacon was inserted into the instrument and the total carotenoid content (Tct) was measured. The instrument displayed the result in mg carotenoids per liter (mg∙l<sup>−1</sup>). To obtain the Tct in &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>, the displayed result was multiplied by the dilution factor (F) according to the following calculation:</p><p>Tct = iCheck reading &#215; F. Here F = 62.5 so we can write Tct = iCheck reading &#215; 62.5 directly.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5_3"><title>2.5.3. Fiber Content</title><p>A sample of four peeled tuberous roots from each clone was cut. A visual assessment was made by three people; the rating scales were defined as follows: 1 (no fiber), 2 (low fibrous), 3 (medium fibrous), 4 (very fibrous).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5_4"><title>2.5.4. Cooking and Taste</title><p>For each clone, a sample of four peeled and cut tuberous roots was cooked in water in casseroles. After cooking, an assessment was made by three people according to a rating scale of: 1 (good), 2 (medium) and 3 (bad) for cooking and 1 (sweet), 2 (neutral), 3 (bitter) for taste.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Quantitative data (mite incidence, mite severity, yield, dry matter and total carotenoid content) were submitted to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA I) to test the clone effect on each trait. Before performing this test, the normal distribution according to the Shapiro-Wilk test and the homogeneity of variances were checked. When these conditions were verified and accepted, ANAOVA I was performed. Any significant ANOVA (P &lt; 0.05) was followed by TURKEY’s highly significant difference (HSD) to rank averages. This test was used to identify objects that differed significantly from others. Data that do not follow a normal distribution according to the Shapiro-Wilk test have undergone a natural logarithm, square root and Arcsinus transformation. If the distribution remains abnormal or the variances not homogeneous after the transformations of variables, Kruskall Wallis non-parametric test was applied. Analyses were performed with Xlstat 2018.7.5 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref14">14</xref>]. Fiber rate, cooking and taste were scored as qualitative traits.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Agronomic Parameters</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Incidence of Mites</title><p>Mites attacked the 31 tested clones and the three control clones equally (P = 0.86). The lowest incidence was 95% for the control Bonoua2 and the highest was 100% for 26 clones tested and the control Bocou2.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Mite Severity</title><p>The analysis of variance of the severity was not significant (P= 0.93). The severity of mite attack on the overall clones including controls was in the range of 3 on a 5-point scale. The lowest severity was 2.60 for the tested clone I083594a and the highest was 3.80 obtained with the tested clone I102446 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Tuberous Root Yield</title><p>Estimation of fresh tuberous root yield showed highly significant variation (P &lt; 0.001) among coloured flesh cassava tested clones. Of the 31 tested clones, the yield of 25 clones was statistically identical to the control variety Bocou2 (46.01 &#177; 14.88 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). Five clones (I084157, I084563, I085894, I083774 and I070520) obtained at least 50 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> on average. The highest yield (55.88 &#177; 6.16 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was recorded with clone I083774. The lowest yield was obtained with clone I070557 (16.39 &#177; 5.58 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Technological Parameters</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Dry Matter Content</title><p>Dry matter content varied significantly (P &lt; 0.001) from 33.08% &#177; 0.97% (clone I085006) to 43.63% &#177; 0.61% (Bonoua2). Twenty-two clones recorded statistically identical rates with the control cultivar Yac&#233;. The rate was at least equal to about 42% on average with coloured-flesh clones I090006, I102480 and the control</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Averages and standard deviations of incidence, mite severity and yield of the 34 clones</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clones</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incidence of mites (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Severity of mites (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield (t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bocou2 (T1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.01 &#177; 14.88<sup>abcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonoua2 (T3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.46 &#177; 7.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15 &#177; 0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.51 &#177; 2.67<sup>def</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yac&#233; (T2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.22 &#177; 4.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.68 &#177; 1.99<sup>bcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.91 &#177; 10.78<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I084157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.33 &#177; 2.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.18 &#177; 11.60<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.61 &#177; 2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18 &#177; 0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.27 &#177; 14.00<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085894</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.89 &#177; 0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.57 &#177; 5.30<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I070520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.08 &#177; 16.51<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102446</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.08 &#177; 5.69<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083739</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90 &#177; 0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.33 &#177; 10.63<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.90 &#177; 4.27<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083594b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.27 &#177; 10.66<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I084563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.46 &#177; 8.92<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.44 &#177; 1.13<sup>cdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I0701026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51 &#177; 0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.40 &#177; 4.34<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083774</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24 &#177; 0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.88 &#177; 6.16<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.74 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.84 &#177; 12.38<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.74 &#177; 12.08<sup>abcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.15 &#177; 8.12<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.10 &#177; 5.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.13 &#177; 7.00<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.92 &#177; 12.37<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083594a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.61 &#177; 2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60 &#177; 0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.28 &#177; 3.59<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68 &#177; 0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.47 &#177; 4.37<sup>abcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57 &#177; 1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.78 &#177; 3.42<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15 &#177; 0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.79 &#177; 6.96<sup>abcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18 &#177; 0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.75 &#177; 8.11<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28 &#177; 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.98 &#177; 2.09<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54 &#177; 0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.13 &#177; 7.05<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24 &#177; 10.04<sup>bcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083849</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.61 &#177; 2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.12 &#177; 10.38<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083724b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02 &#177; 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.78 &#177; 5.87<sup>bcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083724a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25 &#177; 0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.58 &#177; 4.56<sup>ef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51 &#177; 0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.26 &#177; 2.71<sup>bcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I070557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.39 &#177; 5.58<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.53 &#177; 1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.24 &#177; 12.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the same column, values followed by the same letters are statistically identical at the 5% level. T1: Control for yield; T2: Control for dry matter content; T3: Control for fiber content, cooking and taste after cooking.</p><p>Yac&#233;. However, the highest rate was recorded with the control Bonoua2 with a relatively higher rate than the reference control Yac&#233;. The lowest rate was obtained with clone I085006 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Total Carotenoids Content</title><p>Total carotenoids content in tuberous roots was very highly significant different (P &lt; 0.001) among coloured-flesh clones and among these clones and the improved control variety Bocou2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Thirteen clones (I082425, I084157, I102446, I102405, I083594b, I090170, I0701026, I090091, I085006, I102432, I090111, I083594a and I090090) recorded statistically significantly higher levels than the control Bocou2 (8.01 &#177; 0.19 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>). The levels recorded with the 31 ITTA clones and Bocou2 (yellow-flesh) were higher than those of the local varieties Bonoua2 and Yac&#233; (white-flesh). The highest total carotenoid content was recorded with clone I082425 (18.39 &#177; 1.19 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>) which is statistically identical to those of clones I082425, I084157, I102446 and I090091 and the lowest content with Yac&#233; (3.48 &#177; 0.168 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Fiber Content</title><p>Fiber ratio varied from 1 to 4. The score 1 (no fiber) was obtained with the control Bonoua2. The tuberous roots of the 31 coloured-flesh clones were fibrous (low to very fibrous). Thirteen clones (I084157, I070520, I083739, I0701026, I083774, I085006, I102429, I082461, I090006, I102480, I083724b, I083724a and I085056) were low fibrous with a score of 2. Fifteen clones (I102103, I085894, I102446, I102405, I102405, I084563, I090170, I090091, I102432, I090151, I090111, I083594a, I085613, I083849 and I070557) were moderately fibrous with score 3 and three clones (I082425, I082264 and I090090) were highly fibrous with score 4.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. Cooking</title><p>Only the clone I090006 obtained with the control Bonoua2 a score of 1, i.e. good cooking. Thirteen clones (I084157, I0701026, I083774, I085006, I102432, I085613, I082264, I090090, I082461, I102480, I083724b, I083724a and I085056) were medium cooking (score 2) and seventeen clones (I082425, I102103, I085894, I070520, I102446, I083739, I102405, I102405, I084563, I090170, I090091, I090151, I090111, I083594a, I102429, I083849 and I070557) were bad cooking (score 3).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_5"><title>3.2.5. Taste</title><p>Seven clones (I082425, I070520, I083774, I082264, I083849, I085056 and I070557) with coloured-flesh and the control Bonoua2 obtained a score of 1, i.e. good taste. Twenty clones (I084157, I085894, I102446, I102405, I102405, I084563, I0701026, I090091, I085006, I102432, I090151, I083594a, I085613, I102429, I090090, I082461, I090006, I102480, I083724b and I083724a) were neutral taste (note 2) and four clones (I102103, I083739, I090170 and I090111) were bitter (note 3).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean values and standard deviation of dry matter content and total carotenoids content of the 34 cassava clone</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clones</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter content (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total carotenoid content (&#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bocou2 (T1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.43 &#177; 0.23<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.01 &#177; 0.19<sup>gh</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonoua2 (T3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.63 &#177; 0.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87 &#177; 0.34<sup>h</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yac&#233; (T2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.70 &#177; 1.12<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48 &#177; 0.17<sup>h</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.97 &#177; 0.43<sup>cdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.39 &#177; 1.19<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I084157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.48 &#177; 5.38<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.57 &#177; 1.92<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.76 &#177; 2.55<sup>cdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.93 &#177; 0.95<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085894</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.38 &#177; 0.72<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.78 &#177; 0.65<sup>bcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I070520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.63 &#177; 5.31<sup>cdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.57 &#177; 1.32<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102446</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.34 &#177; 2.70<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.26 &#177; 0.55<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083739</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.38 &#177; 0.72<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.89 &#177; 0.09<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.92 &#177; 1.70<sup>abcde</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.02 &#177; 0.59<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083594b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.26 &#177; 1.26<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.80 &#177; 1.60<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I084563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.05 &#177; 0.91<sup>ef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.88 &#177; 2.21<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.18 &#177; 0.91<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.96 &#177; 1.60<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I0701026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.33 &#177; 0.54<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.35 &#177; 0.22<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083774</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.97 &#177; 1.79<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.91 &#177; 0.04<sup>defg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.91 &#177; 2.20<sup>cdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.29 &#177; 1.79<sup>abc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.08 &#177; 0.97<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.45 &#177; 1.74<sup>abcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.61 &#177; 0.97<sup>def</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.84 &#177; 2.42<sup>abcde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.06 &#177; 0.86<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.37 &#177; 0.42<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.83 &#177; 1.18<sup>ef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.73 &#177; 0.61<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083594a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.44 &#177; 0.02<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.60 &#177; 1.80<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.18 &#177; 2.12<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.67 &#177; 1.12<sup>efg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.36 &#177; 4.16<sup>bcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.36 &#177; 2.11<sup>abcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.45 &#177; 1.78<sup>abcdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.12 &#177; 0.73<sup>bcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.65 &#177; 0.87<sup>abcde</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.23 &#177; 1.50<sup>abcdef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I082461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.66 &#177; 1.45<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.18 &#177; 0.42<sup>cdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I090006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.67 &#177; 1.31<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.35 &#177; 0.67<sup>bcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I102480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.12 &#177; 0.76<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.68 &#177; 1.73<sup>gh</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083849</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.05 &#177; 2.05<sup>cdef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.78 &#177; 1.30<sup>bcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083724b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.70 &#177; 1.11<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06 &#177; 0.87<sup>bcdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I083724a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.21 &#177; 0.68<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64 &#177; 0.69<sup>cdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I085056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.86 &#177; 1.17<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.24 &#177; 2.50<sup>cdefg</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I070557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.97 &#177; 1.86<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.51 &#177; 1.60<sup>defg </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.48 &#177; 3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.61 &#177; 3.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the same column, values followed by the same letters are statistically identical at the 5% level. T1: Control for yield; T2: Control for dry matter content; T3: Control for fiber content, cooking and taste after cooking.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Agronomic Parameters</title><p>The tropical zone offers favorable conditions for the most damaging mite species Mononychellustanajoa on cassava during the dry season when mean temperatures vary between 24˚C and 31˚C and relative humidity values from 50% to 70% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref15">15</xref>]. The 31 cassava coloured-flesh clones showed significant attacks as observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref16">16</xref>] cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref5">5</xref>] who showed that the selection of mite resistant varieties is less efficient. So, to control these attacks, the use of natural predators seems to be the most efficient method. Indeed, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref16">16</xref>] noted that mites belonging to the family Phytoseiidae are used as the main control agents against green mites. Biological control programs already exist in some research institutes such as IITA, CIAT and EMBRAPA.</p><p>High variability in cassava yield was observed among the 31 tested clones. Differences in fresh tuberous root yields among clones were observed. This difference could be explained firstly by the number of roots per plant and, on the other hand, by the weight of tuberous roots per plant. In our study, five coloured- flesh clones had yields of at least 50 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. These yields are higher than those recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref10">10</xref>] during the evaluation work, in which the best performing clones had yields below 40 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. However, these yields are close (or even statistically identical) to the yields obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref9">9</xref>] which were around 60 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in an evaluation of coloured-flesh cassava varieties. Of the 31 coloured-flesh clones, 25 clones gave fresh tuberous root yields statistically equivalent to Bocou2 (reference control, a variety popularized in C&#244;te d’Ivoire) which is an improved yellow-flesh, high-yielding variety. The results obtained in this study could be improved by efficient pest and disease control. Local varieties Bonoua2 and Yac&#233; are not very productive compared to some clones that are improved varieties. These results are in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref18">18</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref19">19</xref>] which showed the superiority of yields of improved varieties over local varieties, in other words, improved varieties give significantly higher yields than local varieties. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref17">17</xref>], this situation can be explained by the recurrent selection practiced at IITA, transmitting interesting agronomic traits from previously selected high-yielding progenitors into the new varieties.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Technological Parameters</title><p>The dry matter content varied from 33.08% to 43.63% with a very highly significant difference. This is in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref18">18</xref>] who observed highly significant differences among the dry matter rates of several improved clones. This difference can be explained by the fact that clones belong to different genotypes. The dry matter content of some coloured-flesh tested clones are comparable to those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref9">9</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref10">10</xref>] which are in the range of 30% - 40% in a performance evaluation study of coloured-flesh cassava clones compared to white-flesh cassava varieties which obtained higher levels. Indeed, dry matter content is negatively correlated to total carotenoids content as reported by several authors including [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref20">20</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref21">21</xref>]. However, two yellow-flesh varieties (I090006 and I102480) have similar dry matter content as Yac&#233;, the white-flesh control.</p><p>The 31 coloured-flesh clones and the control Bocou2, which is a yellow-flesh variety, had higher total carotenoid contents than the local white-flesh varieties Bonoua2 and Yac&#233;. These results support those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref22">22</xref>] who showed that coloured-flesh cassava varieties have higher total carotenoid contents than white- flesh varieties. Tested clones recorded higher total carotenoid contents than the control Bocou2 (8.01 &#177; 0.19 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>). Clones I082425 and I084157 recorded the highest total carotenoids contents of 18.39 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> and 17.57 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> respectively, which is more than twofold the content of the control (8.01 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup>). This could be explained by the fact that these clones have been enriched (biofortified) in carotenoids. Howerver, the highest carotenoid contents in tested clones are far lower than those observed in coloured-flesh sweet potato varieties, which range from 20 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> to more than 100 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref23">23</xref>], but much higher than those observed in coloured-flesh cassava varieties, which range from 0.31 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> to 10.5 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Coloured-flesh clones had generally bad cooking, in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref25">25</xref>] cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref26">26</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref27">27</xref>]. These authors showed that bad cooking of coloured-flesh cassava could be due to high carotenoid content. It could also be due to the quality of the starch i.e. the level of cooking resistant starch which could be high. Indeed, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref28">28</xref>] found high levels of starch qualified as cooking resistant in bananas that did not cook. On the other hand, low-fiber clones could be suitable for other purposes (semolina, gari etc.).</p><p>Bad tastes are due to the content of cyanogenic glycosides that define the bitterness of cassava flesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref3">3</xref>]. Cassava is considered ‘bitter’, when the cyanogenic glucoside content is higher than 50 &#181;g∙g<sup>−1</sup> of fresh matter. For bitter cassava varieties, transformation processes for the detoxification of cassava are necessary in order to make it fit for consumption. Indeed, the ingesting of large quantities of uncooked or boiled bitter roots for a very short time can be dangerous because cyanogenic glycosides can be broken down by the enzymes of the intestinal flora and release hydrocyanic acid (HCN) that is toxic to the human body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112142-ref3">3</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The aim was to identify high-yielding, carotenoid-rich and versatile cassava varieties by comparing 31 coloured cassava clones with three control clones. Several clones were identified according to yield, dry matter content and total carotenoid contents. Coloured-flesh Cassava was generally fibrous, with bad cooking and good taste after cooking in water. The clone I082425 had the highest total carotenoid content with high yield, medium dry matter content, good taste, but bad cooking. The clone I084157 had the highest total carotenoid content and yield, low fiber content, high dry matter content, medium cooking and neutral taste. In addition, clone I083774 is also interesting (high yield, dry matter content close to the reference control, medium cooking and good taste, but with half the total carotenoid content of the best clone). The introduction of these three identified clones in the farming environment can therefore strengthen food security with various food transformations.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Boni, N., Koudous, C.I., Guillaume, K.K., Sidoine, E.B., Brice, D.K.E. and Sylv&#232;re, S.R. (2021) High-Yield- ing and Carotenoid-Rich Clones Identification among Thirty-One Cassava Clones with Colored Fles. American Journal of Plant Sci- ences, 12, 1445-1458. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.129102</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.112142-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT) (2020). http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Segnou</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Caractéristiques morpho-physiologiques liées à la précocité du rendement chez le manioc</article-title><source> Cahiers Agricultures</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 77</fpage>-<lpage>79</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vernier, P., N’Zué, B. and Zakhia-Rozis, N. (2018) Le manioc, entre culture alimen-taire et filière agro-industrielle. éditions Quae, CTA, Presses agronomiques de Gem-bloux.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salvador, E.M., Steenkamp, V. and Mccrindle, C.M.E. (2014) Production, Consumption and Nutritional Value of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in Mozambique: An Overview. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 6, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.5897/JABSD2014.0224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’Zué, B. (2007) Caractérisation morphologique, sélection variétale et amélioration du taux de multiplication végétative chez le manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz (Eu-phorbiaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Cocody, Abidjan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mendez del Villar, P., Adaye, A., Tran, T., Allagba, K. and Bancal, V. (2017) Analyse de la cha&amp;#238ne de Manioc en C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire. Rapport pour l’Union Européenne, DG-DEVCO. Value Chain Analysis for Development Project (VCA4D CTR 2016/ 375-804), C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire, 169 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gannon, B.M., Pungarcher, I., Mourao, L., Davis, C.R., Simon, P., Pixley, K.V. and Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2016) 13C Natural Abundance of Serum Retinol Is a Novel Biomarker for Evaluating Provitamin A Carotenoid-Biofortified Maize Consumption in Male Mongolian Gerbils. The Journal of Nutrition, 146, 1290-1297.https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.230300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ceballos, H., Davrieux, F., Talsma, E.F., Belalcazar, J., Chavarriaga, P. and An-dersson, M.S. (2017) Carotenoids in Cassava Roots. In: Cvetkovic, D. and Nikolic, G., Eds., Carotenoids, IntechOpen, London, 189-221.https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntawuruhunga, P. and Okidi, J. (2010) Eastern Africa Root Crops Research Network (EARRNET) Legacy. Performance Report No. 20042007, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dixon, A., Okechukwu, R.U., Akoroda, M.O., Ilona, P., Ogbe, F., Eges, C.N., Kulakow, P.A., Ssemakula, G., Maziya-Dixon, B. and Iluebbey, P. (2010) Improved Cassava Variety Handbook. Rapport Technique, International Institute of Tropical Agri-culture, Ibadan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djinadou, A.K.A., Olodo, N.I. and Adjanohoun, A. (2018) Evaluation du compor-tement de variétés améliorées de manioc riches en bêta-carotène au Sud du Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 12, 703-715.https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i2.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Traoré, K., Sorho, F., Dramane, D.D. and Sylla, M. (2013) Adventices h&amp;#244tes alternatifs de virus en culture de Solanaceae en C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire. Agronomie Africaine, 25, 231-237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fondio, L., Djidji, H.A., Kouamé, C. and Traoré, D. (2003) Effet de la date de semis sur la production du gombo (Abelmoschus spp.) dans le centre de la C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire. Agronomie africaine, 15, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.4314/aga.v15i1.1626</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">XLSTAT by Addinsoft (2018) Statistical and Data Analysis Solution Version 2018.7.5.https://www.xlstat.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campo, B.V.H., Hyman, G. and Bellotti, A. (2011) Threats to Cassava Production: Known and Potential Geographic Distribution of Four Key Biotic Constraints. Food Security, 3, Article No. 329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0141-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikotun, T. and Osiru, D.S.O. (1990) Les contraintes à la production. Porceedings Le manioc en Afrique. Tropicale, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’Zué, B., Zouhouri, P.G. and Sangaré A. (2004) Performances agronomiques de quelques variétés de Manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) dans trois zones agrocli-matiques de la C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire. Agronomie africaine, 16, 1-7.https://doi.org/10.4314/aga.v16i2.1646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakayoko, S., Kouadio, K.K.H., Soro, D., Tschannen, A., Nindjin, C., Dao, D. and Girardin, O. (2012) Rendements en tubercules frais et teneurs en matière sèche de soixante-dix nouvelles variétés de manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivées dans le centre de la C&amp;#244te d’Ivoire. Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 14, 1961-1977.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouadio, K.K.H., Ettien, D.J.B., Bakayoko, S., Soro, D. and Girardin, O. (2014) Va-riabilité physico-morphologique des racines tubéreuses de manioc (Manihot escu-lenta Crantz) cultivées sur ferralsol en zone de forêt d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 82, 7316-7325. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v82i1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinwale, M.G.B., Aladesanwa, R.D., Akinyele, B.O., Dixon, A.G.O. and Odiyi, A.C. (2010) Inheritance of &amp;#223-Carotene in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2, 198-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ceballos, H., Morante, N., Sánchez, T., Ortiz, D., Aragon, I., Chávez, A.L., Pizarro, M., Calle, F. and Dufour, D. (2013) Rapid Cycling Recurrent Selection for Increased Carotenoids Content in Cassava Roots. Crop Science, 53, 2342-2351.https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.02.0123</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bechoff, A., Chijioke, U., Tomlins, K.I., Govinden, P., Ilona, P., Westby, A. and Boy, E. (2015) Carotenoid Stability during Storage of Yellow Gari Made from Biofortified Cassava or with Palm Oil. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 44, 36-44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kapinga,, R.S., Tumwegamire, S., Ndunguru, J., Andrade, M.I., Agili, S. and Mwanga, R.O.M. (2010) Catalogue of Orange-Fleshed Sweetpotato Varieties for Sub-Sa-haran Africa. International Potato Center, Lima.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vimala, B., Thushara, R. and Nambisan, B. (2010) Carotenoid Retention in Yellow-Fleshed Cassava during Processing. Proceedings of the 15th Triennial International Society for Tropical Root Crops (ISTRC) Symposium, Lima, 2-6 November 2009, 24-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moorthy, S.N., Wenham, J.E. and Blanshard, J.M. (1996) Effect of Solvent Extraction on the Gelatinisation Properties of Flour and Starch of Five Cassava Varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 72, 329-336.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199611)72:3%3C329::AID-JSFA663%3E3.0.CO;2-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njenga, P., Edema, R. and Kamau, J. (2014) Combining Ability for Beta-Carotene and Important Quantitative Traits in a Cassava F1 Population. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 6, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS12.069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vimala, B., Nambisan, B., Thushara, R. and Unnikrishnan, M. (2008) Variability of Carotenoids in Yellow-Fleshed Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Clones. Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Kerala.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112142-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toro, A.G. (2015) Impact de l’opération de cuisson du plantain sur la digestibilité in vitro de l’amidon. Ph.D. Dissertation, SupAgro, Monpellier.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>