<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2380-4327</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jhepgc.2021.74080</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC-112004</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Multiverse Model: External Universe(s) as Source of Dark Energy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Werner</surname><given-names>Krause</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Berlin, Germany</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>08</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>1306</fpage><lpage>1314</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) model is currently the best model to describe the development of the Universe from the Big Bang to the present time. It is composed of six parameters, two of them, Dark Energy (DE) and CDM, with unknown physical explanations. DE, leading to accelerated expansion of the Universe, is considered a scalar field characterized by exerting its force by repulsive gravity. We examined whether DE can be explained as the warping of spacetime in our Universe by external universes as components of a Multiverse or, in other words, as the gravitational pull exerted by other universes. The acceleration, the resultant kinetic energy, E
  <sub>kin</sub>, and the cosmological constant, Λ, were calculated for one to four external universes. The acceleration is approx. 10
  <sup>-11</sup> m/s
  <sup>2</sup>, which is in agreement with observations. Its value is dependent upon the numbers and relative positions of external universes. DE density is approx. 10
  <sup>-29</sup> kg/m
  <sup>3</sup> and Λ is in the range of 10
  <sup>-38</sup> s
  <sup>-2</sup> and 10
  <sup>-55</sup> m
  <sup>-2</sup>, respectively. Warping of spacetime by external universes as a physical explanation for DE seems feasible and warrants further considerations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Accelerated Expansion of the Universe</kwd><kwd> Dark Energy</kwd><kwd> Gravitational Pull</kwd><kwd> Warping of Spacetime</kwd><kwd> Multiverse</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The standard model of cosmology, ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter), is able to explain the status of our Universe starting from the Big Bang via formation of elements, stars and galaxies until present-day cosmological observations. ΛCDM is based on Einstein’s General Relativiy (GR) and the field equations derived from GR:</p><p>G μ ν + Λ g μ ν = k T μ ν</p><p>with G<sub>μν</sub> = Einstein tensor, Λ = cosmological constant,g<sub>μν</sub> = metric tensor, k = Einstein gravitational constant, and T<sub>μν</sub> = stress-energy tensor. According to the original version of GR, which did not contain Λ, the Universe is static, which means neither expanding nor crunching. Einstein revised this notion when it was discovered that the Universe is expanding by introducing Λ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref1">1</xref>], which he revoked later [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref2">2</xref>] but which resurrected in 1998 after discovering the accelerating expansion of our Universe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Six parameters are minimally necessary for the ΛCDM model, age of the Universe, scalar spectral index, curvature fluctuation amplitude, reionization optical depth, baryon matter density, Dark Energy (DE) density, and CDM density. Despite huge efforts, the latter two parameters still cannot be explained physically at present. Nevertheless, the ΛCDM model has been and still is the most efficient tool to cover cosmological observations. The characterization and check of feasibility of a physical explanation of DE is the objective of this paper.</p><p>DE has negative pressure and contributes to T<sub>μν</sub>, the stress-energy tensor, leading to accelerated expansion of the Universe. DE is acting like repulsive gravity constituting approx. 68% of the mass-energy density of the Universe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref5">5</xref>]. The remaining 32% are CDM (28%) and normal, baryonic matter (4%).</p><p>The focus of this paper is to check the feasibility for the following physical explanation of DE: warping of spacetime in our Universe due to a source or sources located outside of our Universe. The basis for this hypothesis is the existence of one or more other universes in addition to our Universe (Multiverse model). The concept of multiple universes or Multiverses has controversially been discussed by many physicists, dividing them into two groups, the believers such as for example Tegmark [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref6">6</xref>], Riess [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref7">7</xref>], and Hawking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref8">8</xref>] and the skeptics, for example, Penrose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref9">9</xref>] and Mukhanov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>As a check of feasibility of the proposed hypothesis, the kinetic energy of our Universe due to the gravitational pull by one or more external universes has been calculated and from the resulting energy density, the two parameters, accelerated expansion and Λ, have been obtained using Einstein’s field equation. Both, acceleration and Λ, are in agreement with cosmological observations.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Calculations</title><p>In order to simplify the calculations, it is assumed that all universes have a zero curvature, i.e. they are flat, follow the same laws of physics and are similar in size (radius r = 4.40 &#215; 10<sup>26</sup> m) and mass (m [baryonic + dark matter] = 1.01 &#215; 10<sup>54</sup> kg). A three-dimensional coordinate system, x, y, z, is used with its origin U<sub>0</sub> (0, 0, 0) at the center of our Universe. Accordingly, any other universes have x-, y-, and z-coordinates, which are equal to or larger than twice the radius of the Universe, r. In the following, all coordinates are provided as multiples of r.</p><p>The net gravitational pull, F, of external universes is calculated according to Newton’s law, F = G m 1 m 2 / R i 2 with G = 6.674 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/kg/s<sup>2</sup>, m<sub>1</sub> = m<sub>2</sub> = 1.45 &#215;10<sup>53</sup> kg (baryonic mass) + 8.7 &#215; 10<sup>53</sup> kg (Cold Dark Matter [CDM] mass) = 1.01 &#215; 10<sup>54</sup> kg (total mass). The mass of CDM is obtained from its density of 2.24 &#215; 10<sup>−27</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup>, as reported by Carmeli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref11">11</xref>], and the volume of our Universe (3.57 &#215; 10<sup>80</sup> m<sup>3</sup>). R<sub>i</sub> is the vector pointing from the center of our Universe to the center(s) of the external universe(s).</p><p>The overall gravitational pull of more than one external universe, F, is obtained by additive vector calculation after determination of the individual x-, y-, and z-components, F<sub>i</sub>, for the individual pull of each external universe. R<sub>i</sub> is obtained as R i = ( x i − a i ) 2 + ( y i − b i ) 2 + ( z i − c i ) 2 .</p><p>The total gravitational pull, F<sub>i</sub>, of any external universe is obtained from the individual components F<sub>x</sub>, F<sub>y</sub>, and F<sub>z</sub> with F x = F i cos α , F y = F i cos β , and F z = F i cos γ , with cos α = ( x i − a i ) / R i , cos β = ( y i − b i ) / R i , and cos γ = ( z i − c i ) / R i . The overall force, F, is then calculated individually summing up the F<sub>x</sub>, F<sub>y</sub>, and F<sub>z</sub> components of all external universes according to F = ∑ F x 2 + ∑ F y 2 + ∑ F z 2 . The angle between the overall resulting vector, R, and the z-axis is θ and the angle between the projection of R on the xy-plane and the x-axis is Φ.</p><p>The acceleration of our Universe induced by gravity of external universes U<sub>i</sub>, is calculated from a = F/m<sub>1</sub>. The net velocity of our Universe due to the net gravitational pull by external Universes is obtained as v ( t ) = v ( t 0 ) + a t with v (t<sub>0</sub>) = 0. For t, 13 billion years (4.10 &#215; 10<sup>17</sup> s) is used. The numbers obtained for a and v are net values due to the gravitational pull by external universes, not taking into consideration any effects by the Big Bang, which means v(t<sub>0</sub>) is set as zero. The distance the Universe has traveled after 13 billion years is calculated from d = vt. The relative distance is d/r.</p><p>The kinetic energy E<sub>kin</sub> of our Universe due to the gravitational pull of the external universe(s) is calculated according to E<sub>kin</sub> = 1/2m<sub>1</sub>v<sup>2</sup> with v = the velocity of our Universe due to the gravitational pull after t = 13 billion years. E<sub>kin</sub> is defined as DE. With E<sub>kin</sub> = mc<sup>2</sup>, mass, m, is calculated and after division with the volume of our Universe V, the density of DE, ρ<sub>λ</sub>, is obtained. Einstein’s field equations are then used for the calculation of Λ according to</p><p>G μ ν + Λ g μ ν = k T μ ν</p><p>With G<sub>μν</sub> = Einstein tensor, Λ = cosmological constant, g<sub>μν</sub> = metric tensor, k = Einstein gravitational constant, and T<sub>μν</sub> = stress-energy tensor leading to</p><p>G μ ν + Λ g μ ν = 8 π G T μ ν ,</p><p>and, finally to</p><p>Λ = 8 π G ρ λ ,</p><p>with ρ<sub>λ</sub> = density of DE, for Λ with the dimension s<sup>−2</sup></p><p>and to</p><p>Λ = 4 π G ρ λ / c 2 ,</p><p>with c = speed of light, for Λ with the dimension m<sup>−2</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The force, F, on our Universe by the gravitational pull of one external universe U (2, 0, 0) at a location twice the radius r from the center of our Universe, i.e. directly adjacent, is 8.88 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup> N (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) resulting in a net acceleration of our Universe of 8.75 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup> and a net velocity of 35,865 km/s. As a consequence, after 13 billion years the Universe has moved 1.47 &#215; 10<sup>25</sup> m or 0.03 r from its original position in the direction of U<sub>1</sub> and the latter has moved the same distance in the direction of our Universe.</p><p>The kinetic energy, E<sub>kin</sub>, of our Universe due to the gravitational pull by one external universe is 6.53 &#215; 10<sup>68</sup> J from which an energy density, ρ<sub>Λ</sub>, of 2.03 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> is calculated. The cosmological constant, Λ, is then obtained as 3.41 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> and 1.90 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively.</p><p>If the external universe is located further away, e.g. at position U (10, 0, 0), we get F = 3.55 &#215; 10<sup>42</sup> N, a = 3.50 &#215; 10<sup>−12</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup>, and v = 1434 km/s, for U (100, 0, 0) we have F = 3.55 &#215; 10<sup>40</sup> N and v = 14.3 km/s and for U (1000, 0, 0) we obtain F = 3.55 &#215; 10<sup>38</sup> N, a = 3.50 &#215; 10<sup>−16</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup>, and v = 0.14 km/s. The dependence of F, a, ρ<sub>Λ</sub>, and Λ on the location of an external universe at position U (n, 0, 0) with n = 2 - 10 is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The density of DE, ρ<sub>λ</sub>, is ρ<sub>λ</sub> = 1.64 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> for U (2, 0, 0). For U (10, 0, 0) we obtain ρ<sub>λ</sub> = 2.62 &#215; 10<sup>−32</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> and for U (100,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the parameters obtained for four different Mulitverse models with one to four external universes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U (2)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U (3)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U (4)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U (5)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.88 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >a (m/s<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.75 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27 &#215; 10<sup>−1</sup><sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >v (km/s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35,865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39,846</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >d (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47 &#215; 10<sup>25</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.39 &#215; 10<sup>24</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 &#215; 10<sup>24</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63 &#215; 10<sup>25</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >d (r)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Φ (˚)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−68.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−78.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >θ (˚)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>kin</sub> (J)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.53 &#215; 10<sup>68</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.79 &#215; 10<sup>67</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38 &#215; 10<sup>67</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06 &#215; 10<sup>68</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ρ<sub>Λ</sub> (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.74 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Λ (s<sup>−2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.59 &#215; 10<sup>−39</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29 &#215; 10<sup>−39</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Λ (m<sup>−2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56 &#215; 10<sup>−56</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27 &#215; 10<sup>−56</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.34 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>0, 0) ρ<sub>λ</sub>= 2.62 &#215; 10<sup>−36</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup>. The value for the cosmological constant, Λ, in these three cases is Λ<sub>U2</sub> = 2.75 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 1.53 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>, Λ<sub>U10</sub> = 4.40 &#215; 10<sup>−41</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 2.45 &#215; 10<sup>−58</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>, and Λ<sub>U100</sub> = 4.40 &#215; 10<sup>−45</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 2.45 &#215; 10<sup>−62</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>. Increasing the distance expectedly results in a decrease of force, acceleration, DE density and cosmological constant.</p><p>On the other hand, if the mass of the external universe is increased, this also increases F, a, ρ<sub>Λ</sub>, and Λ, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> for acceleration and Λ.</p><p>In the model with two external universes at positions U<sub>1</sub> (3, 0, 0) and U<sub>2</sub> (−4, 4, 0), we obtain a gravitational pull of F = 3.26 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup> N, a net acceleration of a = 3.21 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup>, and a net velocity of v = 13,157 km/s. The DE density is 2.74 &#215; 10<sup>−30</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> and Λ = 4.59 &#215; 10<sup>−39</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 2.56 &#215; 10<sup>−56</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>.</p><p>In the two three-dimensional graphs, the respective values are F = 2.30 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup> N and F = 9.86 &#215; 10<sup>43</sup> N, a = 2.27 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup> and a = 9.72 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup>, and v = 9292 km/s and v = 39,846 km/s, respectively. Forρ<sub>λ</sub> we obtain 1.37 &#215; 10<sup>−30</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> and 2.51 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup>. The cosmological constants are calculated as 2.29 &#215; 10<sup>−39</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> (1.27 &#215; 10<sup>−56</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>) and 4.21 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> (2.34 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Although the number of theories as modifications or alternatives to the ΛCDM model is constantly increasing, the introduction of the Cosmological Constant Λ by Einstein in 1917 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref2">2</xref>] was the first and still remains the most effective approach to keep the General Relativity equation for large cosmological scales on track. A physical explanation for Λ led to the introduction of a scalar field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref12">12</xref>], without, however, being able to explain what kind of scalar field this could be. The model was modified later on in various ways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref13">13</xref>], including the incorporation of additional dimensions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref14">14</xref>] and numerous other approaches without</p><p>being able to replace the ΛCDM model.</p><p>Other models that have widely been discussed are those based on extended gravity, for example, interferometric detection of gravitational waves as a definitive test of GR, as proposed by Corda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref15">15</xref>], or in general, extensive evaluation of all aspects of gravitational waves leading to gravitational physics and astronomy, as described by several groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>The objective of the present paper is based on the idea that repulsive gravity, which is considered as the driving force of DE, might easily be substituted by “normal”, attractive gravity if the source of this force is placed outside of our Universe. This proposal requires the presence of a Multiverse, which means the existence of more than one universe. Using three-dimensional vector calculation and Newton’s Law on Gravity, the gravitational pull of external universes on our Universe was calculated for one, two, three, and four external universes. The total mass taken into account for a universe included baryonic matter and Dark Matter. For calculating the latter mass, DM density data published by Carmeli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref11">11</xref>] were used. A recent paper by Kusenko [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref22">22</xref>] proposes CDM as black holes in a Multiverse.</p><p>The acceleration achieved due to the gravitational pull by external universes is 2.3 to 9.7 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup> for all four models. This is in agreement with a ~1 km<sup>2</sup>/s<sup>2</sup>pc ≈ 3 &#215; 10<sup>−11</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup> as reported by Walker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>From the acceleration we can calculate the kinetic energy, E<sub>kin</sub>, induced by the gravitational pull and the density of E<sub>kin</sub>, ρ<sub>Λ</sub>. The kinetic energy of the Universe due to the acceleration induced by the external universes is proposed as the physical explanation of DE. E<sub>kin</sub> is in the range of 4.4 &#215; 10<sup>67</sup> J to 8.1 &#215; 10<sup>68</sup> J and ρ<sub>Λ</sub> is 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−30</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup> to 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>−29</sup> kg/m<sup>3</sup>. The cosmological constant, Λ, was then obtained using Einstein’s field equations ranging from 2.3 &#215; 10<sup>−39</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 1.3 &#215; 10<sup>−56</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> to 4.2 &#215; 10<sup>−38</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> or 2.3 &#215; 10<sup>−55</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>, which is somewhat smaller than the 10<sup>−35</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> and 10<sup>−52</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> reported by Carmeli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref11">11</xref>] and Aghanim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref24">24</xref>] or the 7.23 &#215; 10<sup>−36</sup> s<sup>−2</sup> published by Farnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112004-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>The data provided in the present paper for E<sub>kin</sub> and Λ have to be considered a first and rough check of the feasibility of this proposal and need further modeling. For example, the kinetic energies provided above do not take into consideration that the universes are approaching each other and therefore the distance r is decreasing, which results in an increase with time of E<sub>kin</sub> and, likewise, of the cosmological constant, Λ. Other factors for modeling include the numbers, locations, and masses of the external universes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The data obtained in this paper indicate that the accelerated expansion of our Universe can be explained by defining DE as the warping of spacetime by a source outside of our Universe. The kinetic energy caused by the gravitational pull by one or more external universes provides a direct measure for the warping of spacetime from outside. The concept is based on the assumption that we are living in a Multiverse and that the external universes are identical to ours in terms of physical laws and constants, at least regarding Newton’s Law on Gravity.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Krause, W. (2021) Multiverse Model: External Universe(s) as Source of Dark Energy. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 7, 1306-1314. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.74080</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.112004-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Einstein, A. (1917) Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit&amp;auml;tstheorie. Sitzungsberichte der K&amp;ouml;niglich Preu&amp;beta;ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Einstein, A. (1931) Zum kosmologischen Problem der allgemeinen Relativit&amp;auml;tstheorie. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 235.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riess, A.G. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999) The Supernova Cosmology Project, Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maeder, A., et al. (2020) Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters. Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tegmark, M. (2003) Parallel Universes, Honoring John Wheeler’s 90th Birthday. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. arXiv: astro-ph/0302131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riess, A.G., et al. (2001) The Farthest Known Supernova: Support for an Accelerating Universe and a Glimpse of the Epoch of Deceleration. The Astrophysical Journal, 560, 49. https://doi.org/10.1086/322348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawking, S.W. and Hertog, T. (2018) A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, Article No. 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2018)147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Penrose, R. (2012) Cycles of Time, an Extraordinary New View of the Universe. Vintage Books, a Division of Random House Incorporated, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukhanov, V. (2014) Inflation without Selfreproduction. Fortschritte der Physik, 63, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201400074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmeli, M. and Kuzmenko, T. (2001) Value of the Cosmological Constant: Theory versus Experiment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 586, 316. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1419571</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ratra, P. and Peebles, L. (1988) Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field. Physical Review D, 37, 3406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carroll, S.M., Duvvuri, V., Trodden, M., et al. (2004) Is Cosmic Speed-Up Due to New Gravitational Physics? Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 043528. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043528</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dvali, G.R., Gabadadze, G. and Porrati, M. (2000) 4D Gravity on a Brane in 5D Minkowski Space. Physics Letters B, 485, 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00669-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corda, C. (2009) Interferometric Detection of Gravitational Waves: The Definitive Test for General Relativity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 2275-2282. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271809015904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arimoto, M., et al. (2021) Gravitational Wave Physics and Astronomy in the Nascent Era. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, ptab042. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, S., Kastaun, W. and Pratten, G. (2021) Rapid Model Comparison of Equations of State from Gravitational Wave Observation of Binary Neutron Star Coalescences. arXiv: 2104.08681 [gr-qc].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talbot, C., Thrane, E., Biscoveanu, S. and Smith, R. (2021) Inference with Finite Time Series: Observing the Gravitational Universe through Windows. arXiv: 2106.13785 [astro-ph.IM]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sedda, M.A., et al. (2021) The Missing Link in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy. A Summary of Discoveries Waiting in the Decihertz Range. Experimental Astronomy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-021-09713-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, R.-G., Cao, Z., Guo, Z.-K., Wang, S.-J. and Yang, T. (2017) The Gravitational-Wave Physics. National Science Review, 4, 687-706.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bian, L., et al. (2021) The Gravitational-Wave Physics II: Progress. arXiv: 2106.10235 [gr-qc].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kusenko, A., et al. (2020) Exploring Primordial Black Holes from the Multiverse with Optical Telescopes. Physical Review Letters, 125, Article ID: 181304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.181304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walker, M.G. and Loeb, A. (2014) Is the Universe Simpler than LCDM? Contemporary Physics, 55, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2014.919741</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aghanim, N., et al. (2019) Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters Astronomy and Astrophysics Manuscript No. msc ESO 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112004-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farnes, J.S. (2018) A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation within a Modified ΛCDM Framework. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 620, A92. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832898</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>