<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2021.129094</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-111771</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Sweet Cherry (&lt;i&gt;Prunus avium&lt;/i&gt; L.) Fruit Drop Reduction by Plant Growth Regulators (Naphthalene Acetic Acid NAA and Gibberellic Acid GA&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ammar</surname><given-names>Askarieh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sawsan</surname><given-names>Suleiman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahasen</surname><given-names>Tawakalna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Administration of Horticulture Research, General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research, Damascus, Syria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Agricultural Scientific Research Center in Lattakia, General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research, Damascus, Syria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1338</fpage><lpage>1346</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study was conducted during 2019/2020 on sweet cherry trees (
  Prunus Avium L.) (Bing and Hardy Giant) cultivar planted at Sergaya-Al_Zabadani area of Rural 
  Dam
  ascus, to reduce fruit drop of sweet cherry. The experiment included 4 foliar applications: T1: control, T2: GA<sub>3</sub> (100 ppm), T3: NAA (20 ppm), T4: (100 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 20 ppm NAA). Fruit set and fruit drop percentage, fruiting factor, and yield were recorded. The results showed that treatment with (100 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 20 ppm NAA) recorded higher fruit set percentage (73.81% and 75.62%), and fruiting factor (48.38% and 50.04%) respectively
  ;
   In addition to fruit yield (40.19 and 41.21 kg/tree) for both cultivars, compared to the control (9.13, 6.60 kg/tree). Therefore, it can be concluded that GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA treatment reduced Sweet cherry fruit drop better than other treatments, where fruit drop percentage didn’t exceed (63.11% and 62.01%) in both cultivars (Bing and Hardy Giant) respectively, compared to the control (80.92% and 80.64%).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sweet Cherry</kwd><kwd> Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA)</kwd><kwd> Gibberellic Acid (GA3)</kwd><kwd> Fruitset</kwd><kwd> FruitDrop</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Plant growth regulators or plant hormones are organic substances that are naturally produced in high plants. They control and activate growth and physiological functions at low concentrations and far from their production site. Use of growth regulators has become an important way in agriculture, especially in fruit trees, such as spraying auxin and Gibberelline, which are widely used to reduce fruit drop and improve their quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>The balance of internal hormones plays a main important role in nutrients distribution’s in plant’s organs and affects bud longevity. It has been confirmed that fruit drop is due to internal content of auxin by external application 2,4-D or NAA, where the transport of auxins by plant stays for a long time without any effect of ethylene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref2">2</xref>], and it’s found that gibberellic acid delays ripening and aging of fruits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>In an experiment on 3 sweet cherries varieties (Sweet Heart, Sunburst, Lapins) to improve fruitset, the trees were sprayed with a mixture of (10 mg/l GA<sub>3</sub>, 10 mg/l NAA) with a week intervals, where the first spray was at the end of flowering, The results showed that fruitset percent was improved by at least 2 times compared with control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Many researches and experiments indicated that repeated application of gibberellic acid (GA<sub>3</sub>) improved fruitset and reduced fruit drop of cherry trees in rainy years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Application of gibberellic acid (100 ppm) on peach trees, increased the fruitset percentage (69.70%) compared to the control (58%), and production (63.23 kg/tree), compared to the control (52.6 kg/tree) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Tuan &amp; Chung-Ruey [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref7">7</xref>] confirmed that foliar spray of apple trees (wax apple) with GA<sub>3</sub> (30 ppm) at the young bud and petal fall stages caused a significant increase in the fruitset percentage, this may be due to the increase in the availability of nutrients from the leaves by gibberellic, similar results were obtained on (wax apple) by Moneruzzaman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref8">8</xref>] as well as on sweet oranges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The results of foliar application with a mixture of (GA<sub>3</sub> 100 mg/l + 100 mg/l NAA) on olive trees showed a higher fruitset percentage (4.78%) compared to control (2.89%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>The study of sweet orange trees (Nucellar) treatment with NAA (15, 20, 25 ppm), improved that the lowest fruit drop percentages (14.19%) was recorded with 15 ppm, and the highest fruitset percentage (64.57%) were at 25 ppm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Treatment of sweet orange trees (Citrus sinensis Osbeck.) Cv. Jaffa with three concentrations of NAA (20, 30, 40 ppm) showed that 20 ppm achieved the highest fruit drop reduction until harvest, the highest fruit retained percentage, the largest number of fruits/tree and the highest production/tree [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>In an experiment on mandarin trees 10 years old, it was observed that application of NAA (10 mg/l) increased fruitset percentage (82.77%), the largest number of fruits/tree and the highest productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref13">13</xref>]. As well as spray of navel orange trees with (GA<sub>3</sub> ppm 20 + NAA ppm 25) reduced the fruit drop percentage and increased productivity (kg/tree) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Sweet cherry trees planted in the study area (Sargaya) suffer from fruit drop, which affects productivity, and according to the importance of growth regulators in increasing the fruitset, reducing fruit drop and increasing productivity, this research was conducted by application Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and Gibberellic acid (GA<sub>3</sub>) to resolve this problem.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The search was carried out at Cherry orchard located in Sargaya, Al-Zabadani area in Rural Damascus, at about 1500 meters altitude from sea level on sweet cherry trees (Prunus avium L.), Bing and Hardy Giant, 20 years old, grafted on Prunus mahaleb. The treatment included: (T1: Control “sprayed with water only”, T2: GA<sub>3</sub> at 100 ppm, T3: NAA at 20 ppm, T4: (100 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 20 ppm NAA), teen 20 was added 1 ml/l growth regulator solution. At white balloon and after fruitset stages for NAA application, and after fruitset for GA<sub>3</sub> application. The experiment was designed by the complete randomized method, with 4 treatments repeated 3 times and 1 tree was used for each treatment. 4 similar flowering branches on each tree were selected, and the number of flowers on each tagged branch for a particular treatment counted. All treatments were performed with a manual hand sprayer to the drip-point. The results were analyzed statistically and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the statistical program Genstat-12. The lowest significant difference LSD was calculated at the level of 5% coefficients to compare the mean and find out the significant differences, after angular conversion of percentages. The studied parameters were:</p><p>&#183; Mean of (total flowers/branch, fruitsets/branch, fruits drop/branch, and ripe fruits/branch)</p><p>&#183; Fruitset percentage:</p><p>F S = F S n T F n &#215; 100</p><p>FS: Fruitset percentage (%),</p><p>FSn: fruitset number,</p><p>TFn: Total flowers number.</p><p>&#183; Fruit drop percentage:</p><p>F D = F D n F S n &#215; 100</p><p>FD: Fruit drop percentage (%),</p><p>FDn: fruit drop number,</p><p>FSn: fruitset number.</p><p>&#183; Fruiting factor:</p><p>F F = F n T F n &#215; 100</p><p>FF: Fruiting factor (%),</p><p>Fn: Fruit number at harvest time,</p><p>TFn: Total flowers number.</p><p>&#183; Fruit weight Mean: A random sample (150 fruits) was taken from the two studied varieties, with 50 fruits of each replicate, and weighed.</p><p>&#183; Tree production (kg): Fruit trees weight was performed and mean fruit production was calculated for each treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> and NAA on Fruitset Percentage</title><p>The results showed that fruitset percentage was increased with NAA treatment (76.43%) compared to control (72.76%) for the Bing variety. While it was (72.85%) with GA<sub>3</sub> without significant differences with control. For Hardy Giant variety fruitset was increased as well with GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA application (73.81%) compared to the other studied treatments, with no significant differences between control (71.59%) and GA<sub>3</sub> treatment (71.66%), <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>These results are in agreement with the results of Stopar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref4">4</xref>] who recommended the foliar spray with a mixture of (GA<sub>3</sub> 10 mg/l + NAA 10 mg/l) as a technical application to increase fruitset percentage for all sweet cherry varieties.</p><p>These results agreed with Bub&#225;n [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref14">14</xref>] who indicated that using growth regulators in order to improve the final fruitset percentage in cherry trees is considered ineffective compared to other types of fruit trees such as pears, despite the presence of many previous studies confirming the possibility of using some growth regulators to obtain good fruitset percentage in the cherry trees too.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of spraying GA<sub>3</sub>, NAA on fruitset percentage</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruitset percentage % after angular conversion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruitset percentage %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of fruitset/branch</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of total flowers/branch</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Bing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.76b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1: Control</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.85b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2: GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.43a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3: NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.62a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4: GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD 5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Hardy Giant</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.59c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1: Control</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.66c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2: GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.79b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3: NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.81a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4: GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD 5%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values that have the same letters within the same column have no significant difference between them at LSD 5%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> and NAA on the Percentage of Fruit Drop and Fruiting Factor</title><p>The results showed the (GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA and GA<sub>3</sub>) treatments decreased fruit drop percentage in Bing (62.01% and 77.68%) respectively, compared to the control (80.64%). In Hardy Giant, application of GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA, decreased as well fruit drop percentage (63.11%) with no significant differences with NAA (63.47%), table (2). The results showed as well that no significant differences between control (80.92%) and GA<sub>3</sub> treatment (80.13%), <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Many researches have succeeded in reducing fruit drop and increasing many varieties of sweet cherries production by foliar application with a mixture of GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA after a short period of flowering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref16">16</xref>]. Plant growth regulators (PGR’s) are known to have a great influence on dropping and maintain fruits on trees. An imbalance of auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins may lead to the formation of a separation layer at the point of contact with branch, causing fruit drop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref17">17</xref>]. Fruit drop reduction due to the application of growth regulators can be attributed to the compensation for endogenous auxin deficiency prevents the formation of a separation layer by inhibiting enzymatic activity by pectinase and polygalacturonase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed as well that fruiting factor significantly increased with GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA application in both cultivars (Bing and Hardy Giant) (48.38%, 50.04%), with no significant difference with NAA (47.68% and 47.05%), compared to the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of spraying GA<sub>3</sub>, NAA on the drop percentage and fruiting factor</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruiting factor % % after angular conversion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruiting factor %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruit drop percentage % after angular conversion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruit drop percentage %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of Ripe fruits/branch</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of Fruits drop/branch</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Bing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.04c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.64d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1: Control</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.45b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.68c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2: GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.05a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.17b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3: NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.04a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.01a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4: GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD 5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Hardy Giant</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.50c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.92b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1: Control</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.32b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.13b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2: GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.68a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.47a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3: NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.38a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4: GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD 5%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values that have the same letters within the same column have no significant difference between them at LSD 5%.</p><p>control (26.50% and 27.04%), respectively.</p><p>Similar results were obtained in previous experiments conducted by Stopar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref4">4</xref>] on (Sunburst, Lapins and Sweetheart) cultivars, and by Webster et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref5">5</xref>] who found that remaining fruits number on Colney’s sweet cherry trees increased 2 times when sprayed with a mixture of (GA<sub>3</sub> 10 mg/l + NAA 10 mg/l). On the other hand, this treatment did not have any effect on Stella cultivar, it would be concluded that Bing cultivar behavior differed to GA<sub>3</sub> Application than Hardy Giant, while the 2 cultivars behaved similar to NAA treatment, so varieties behavior differs to growth regulators application.</p><p>This result is in agreed with Sweety et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref12">12</xref>] who attributed the higher fruiting factor in NAA (20 ppm) treatments to the reduction of fruit drop, where growth regulators treatment compensated the lack of endogenous auxin, thereby preventing the formation of the separation layer, possibly by inhibiting Enzymatic activity.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> and NAA on Fruit Weight and Yield</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> indicated as well a significant effect of GA<sub>3</sub> (7.447 and 8.800 g/fruit) compared to other treatments included the control for Bing and Hardy Giant, respectively.</p><p>This result showed that the increase of fruit yield is due to the enhancement of fruit weight by GA<sub>3</sub> application, not for fruitset percentage. This is confirmed by Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref20">20</xref>] results, where GA<sub>3</sub> (100 mg/l) application had a positive effect on fruits weight of sweet cherry Bing cultivar, while the (200 mg/l) was more effective in increasing fruits weight by 15% compared to the control.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that (GA<sub>3</sub>, NAA and GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA) application enhanced Bing fruit yield (14.78, 28.89 and 40.21 kg/tree), and Hardy Giant fruit yield (11.06, 22.69 and 40.19 kg/tree), compared to the control (Bing and Hardy Giant) (5.93 and 9.13 kg/tree) respectively.</p><p>These results agreed with Stopar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref4">4</xref>], who observed that sweet cherry trees’ yield increased 2 times when sprayed with a mixture of (GA<sub>3</sub> 10 mg/l + NAA 10</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> and NAA on fruit weight and yield (kg/tree)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Bing</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hardy Giant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of fruit weight/g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yield Kg/tree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of fruit weight/g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yield Kg/tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1: Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.670b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.93d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.770b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.13c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2: GA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.447a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.78c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.800a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.06c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3: NAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.320c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.89b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.600b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.69b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4: GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.667b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.21a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.640b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.19a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD 5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.444</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.530</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values that have the same letters within the same column have no significant difference between them at LSD 5%.</p><p>mg/l) compared to non-sprayed trees.</p><p>This result is in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref23">23</xref>] who showed that spraying of orange trees with NAA and GA<sub>3</sub> increased trees yield compared to non-sprayed trees.</p><p>Yield increase in the studied treatments compared to the control could be attributed to the increase in fruits remained number at harvest time. The enhancement of fruit weight may be due to the activation and increase of cell division and cell elongation by NAA and GA<sub>3</sub> treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Agrawal and Dikshit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref25">25</xref>] showed that NAA treatment increased fruit weight and yield as a result of activating cell elongation, increasing vacuole size, flexibility, and cell wall elasticity. Stern et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111771-ref26">26</xref>] also indicated that NAA treatment promotes cell elongation in mesocarp cells, thus increasing fruit size and yield.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>It can be concluded that the application of the mixture of (20 ppm NAA + 100 ppm GA<sub>3</sub>) on cherry trees had a positive effect in reducing fruit drop percentage and increasing fruiting factor compared to the control. NAA + GA<sub>3</sub> application was more effective than NAA alone. The efficacy of the GA<sub>3</sub> + NAA mixture should be further investigated.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>This work was supported by the General commission for scientific agricultural research (GCSAR), Damascus, Syria.</p><p>Mr. Ahmed Sawan, this research was carried out at his cherry field at Sergaya-Al_Zabadani area.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Askarieh, A., Suleiman, S. and Tawakalna, M. (2021) Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) Fruit Drop Reduction by Plant Growth Regulators (Naphthalene Acetic Acid NAA and Gibberellic Acid GA<sub>3</sub>). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 1338-1346. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.129094</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.111771-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suman, M., Sangma, P.D., Meghawal, D.R. and Sahu, O.P. (2017) Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Fruit crops. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6, 331-337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumari, S., Bakshi, P., Sharma, A., Wali, V.K., Jasrotia, A. and Kour, S. (2018) Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Fruit Production in Sub Tropical Crops. Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7, 659-668.  
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.077</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khadar, S.E.S.A., Singh, B.P. and Khan, S.A. (1988) Effect of GA3 as a Post-Harvest Treatments of Mango Fruit on Ripening, Amylase and Peroxidase Activity and Quality during Storage. Scientia Horticulturae, 36, 261-266.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(88)90060-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stopar, M. (2018) Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) Fruit Drop Reduction by the Application of 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid and Gibberellic acid. Acta Hortic, 1221, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1221.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Webster, A.D., Spencer, J.E., Dover, C. and Atkinson, C.J. (2006) The Influence of Sprays of GA3 and AVG on Fruit Abscission, Fruit Ripening and Quality of Two Sweet Cherry Cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 727, 467-472.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.727.57</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, V. and Kaur, G. (2018) Effect of Potassium Nitrate, GA3 and Salicylic Acid on Fruit Yield and Quality of Peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch] cv. Shan-i-Punjab. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review, 6, 20-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuan, N.M. and Chung-Ruey, Y. (2013) Effect of Gibberellic Acid and 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid on Fruit Development and Fruit Quality of Wax Apple. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 7, 299-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moneruzzaman, K.M., Hossain, A.B.M.S., Normaniza, O. and Boyce, A.N. (2011) Growth, Yield and Quality Responses to Gibberellic Acid (GA3) of Wax apple Syzygium Samarangense var. Jambu Air Madu Fruits Grown under Field Conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 11911-11918.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fahad, S. and Rab, A. (2014) Association of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) with Fruit Set and Fruit Drop of Sweet Orange. Journal of Biology, Agricultural and Healthcare, 4, 54-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nafea, S.M. and Abdulfatah, H.K. (2015) Effect of Foliar Application of GA3 and NAA for Reducing Alternate Bearing of OliveTrees (Olea europaea L. cv. Ashrasie). Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 27, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Somwanshi, B.S., Patil, M.B., Nainwad, RV. and Shinde, S.E. (2017) Effect of Different Chemicals on Pre-Harvest Fruit Drop and Fruit Set of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis osbeck.) var. Nucellar. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 5, 168-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rana, S.G.S. and Chandramohan Reddy, G. (2018) Impact of Growth Regulators on Fruit Drop and Yield Parameters of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) cv. Jaffa. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7, 3417-3419.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nawaz, M.A., Afzal, M., Ahmed, W., Ashraf, M., Jaime, A., Teixeira, D.S., Akhtar, N., Shahzad, S.M., Ullah, H. and Hussain, Z. (2011) Exogenous Application of 2,d-D, Ga3 and NAA at Flowering Improves Yield and Quality of Kinnow Mandarin (Citrus Reticulate Blanco). The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 5, 17-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bubán, T. (1996) Using Plant Growth Regulators to Increase Fruit Set in Sour Cherry Trees. Acta Horticulturae, 410, 307-310.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.410.47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Modlibowska, I. and Wickenden, M.F. (1982) Effects of Chemical Growth Regulators on Fruit Production of Cherries. I. Effects of Fruit Setting Hormone Sprays on the Cropping of cvs Merton Glory and Van Cherry Trees. Journal of Horticultural Science, 57, 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1982.11515072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldwin, G.K. and Webster, A.D. (1983) The Cumulative Effects of Hormone Mixtures Containing GA3, DPU plus NOXA, NAA or 2,4,5-TP on the Cropping and Flowering of Sweet Cherry Cultivars, Prunus avium L. Journal of Horticultural Science, 58, 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1983.11515149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H., Dekkers, K.L., Cao, L., Burns, J.K., Timmer, L.W. and Chung, K. (2006) Evaluation of Growth Regulator Inhibitors for Controlling Postbloom Fruit Drop (PFD) of Citrus Induced by Fungi Colletotrichum acutatum. Growth Regulator Inhibitors for Controlling Postbloom, 41, 1317-1321.  
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.5.1317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhaliwal, H.S., Rattanpal, H.S., Anita, and Arora, N. (2009) Integrated Control of Fruit Drop in Kinnow Mandarin. Journal of Research, Punjab Agriculture University, 46, 163-265.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, M.K., Chaudhary, H D., Jain, M.C. and Bhatnagar, P. (2013) Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Yield of Nagpur Mandarin (Citrus Reticulata Blanco.). The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 8, 746-750.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gurjar, P.S. and Rana, G.S. (2014) Influence of Foliar Application of Nutrients and Growth Regulator on Fruit Drop, yield and Fruit Size and Quality in Kinnow Mandarin. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 71, 109-111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanafy, A.A., Khalil, M.K., Abd Ei-Rahman, A.M. and Hamed, N.A.M. (2012) Effect of Zinc, Tryptophan and Indole Acetic Acid on Growth, Yield and Chemical Composition of Valencia Orange Trees. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8, 901-914.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hikal, A.R.F., Ibrahim, M.A. and Abdelaziz, R.A. (2017) Effect of Different Treatments of Calcium and Boron on Productivity and Fruit Quality of Navel Orange Fruits. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 44, 119-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mona, E.M., Helal, N.E., Merwad, A.M.M. and Mansour, A.E.M. (2019) Effect of Some Growth Regulators and Boron on Fruiting and Quality of Orange. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 8, 594-599.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ranjan, R., Purohit, S.S. and Prasad, V. (2003) Plant Hormones: Action and Application. Agrobios, Rajasthan, 183-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, S. and Dikshit, S.N. (2008) Studies on the Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Yield of Sapota (Achras sapota L.) cv. Cricket Ball. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42, 207-211.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111771-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stern, R.A., Flaishman, M. and Ben-Arie, R. (2007) Effect of Synthetic Auxins on Fruit Size of Five Cultivars of Japanese Plum (Prunus saliciana Lindl.). Scientia Horticulturae, 112, 304-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.032</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>