Potassium (K) deficiency damaged membrane stability through irregular reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by K deficiency stress while osmotic adjustment and antioxidant capacities play an essential role in preventing plants from osmotic stress and oxidative damages. To investigate the difference of osmoprotectants and antioxidant enzyme activities in the root, two representative maize varieties, 90-21-3 (K-tolerant) and D937 (K-sensitive), were hydroponically cultivated under normal K (+K) and K deficiency (-K) treatments in Shenyang Agriculture University, China. The results showed that root accumulation, soluble protein in root of 90-21-3 and D937 were decreased under K deficiency stress, but the root to shoot ratio, proline, free amino acid, soluble sugar, reactive oxygen species (ROS) in root for both genotypes were increased. Compared with the root of D937, the root of 90-21-3 was able to swiftly accumulate more proline, free amino acid and soluble sugar in the root when encountering K deficiency. The antioxidant enzyme activity in the root of 90-21-3, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), were significantly increased to counter increased levels of O
2
·
- and H
2O
2 under K deficiency stress. The presented results indicated that osmotic regulator and antioxidant enzyme were actively responded to K deficiency stress, 90-21-3 (K-tolerant maize) accumulated more osmoprotectants and enhanced the activity of antioxidant enzymes to degrade ROS, alleviating oxidative stress.
Maize K Deficiency Root ROS Osmoprotectant and Antioxidase1. Introduction
K, as a major mineral element, plays an essential role in process of crop growth and development, involved in function of osmoregulation, enzyme activation, ion homeostasis, and transport of metabolites in plants [1]. However, compared with application of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), K fertilizer is typically applied at a lower level in intensive agricultural production. An ongoing downward trend of negative K balance of about 60 kg ha–1∙yr–1 appeared in intensive agricultural production areas starting in the late 1990s due to improper fertilization [2]. Consistent with the trend, more than 3/4 of soil of China has been reported deficient in available K [3]. Distinctly, the K deficiency has given rise to seriously inhibiting root growth and development caused by osmotic stress and oxidative stress.
Plants have developed various defense mechanisms in process of long-term evolution to survive the deleterious effects of environment stress. Osmoregulators can improve stress tolerance in plants by actively increasing levels of materials that can adjust the osmotic cellular conditions, including inorganic ions and organic solutes [4]. Inorganic ions and organic solutes are primary components that participate in osmotic adjustment in response to stress and contribute to stress tolerance in plants [5] [6]. Na+ and Ca2+ in vacuoles were verified that could substitute for K+ in osmotic adjustment function which could effectively reduce the negative effects caused by the lack of K+ [3] [7]. And, the accumulated proline, soluble sugar, and phenol could reduce the osmotic stress caused by Fe2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+ deficiency, and improve plant tolerance [8].
K deficiency disrupted equilibrium of ROS that impeded crop growth due to accumulation of O2∙− and H2O2 in roots [9]. ROS disorganized cell physiological function by oxidizing proteins, damaging nucleic acids and causing lipid peroxidation. However, antioxidant systems played decisive roles in scavenging ROS and protecting against destructive oxidative reactions [10]. Antioxidant enzymes in cell can effectively resist oxidative stress damage and reduce the ability of ROS [11]. Besides being a potentially harmful destructor, ROS is a key player in the process of stress responses in complex signaling network. The expression of a high-affinity potassium transporter, HAK5, was triggered by the H2O2 produced under K deficiency [12]. Min et al. [13] also found that POD could affect the expression of AtHAK5 by regulation of ROS. Meanwhile, POD also acted as important antioxidant enzyme to scavenge peroxides and was essential in the balance of ROS [14].
Maize (Zeamays L.) is an important cereal crop with higher demand for potash fertilizer than other crops. More efficient osmoprotection and antioxidation mechanisms could enhance the ability resistance to abiotic stress [15]. However, significant differences have been well documented for osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzyme activity in different genotypes. “Arper” accumulated more organic solutes than “Aristo” to mitigate osmotic stress in root of maize under salt stress [6]. “EyouChangjia” (P use-efficient genotype) of Brassica napus enhanced more antioxidant enzyme activities than “B104-2” (P use-inefficient genotype) under P deficiency stress [16]. However, the activity of osmoregulation and antioxidant enzymes in maize root under K deficiency stress was little attention to reporting. The present study was aimed to assess the effect of osmoregulatory and antioxidant enzymes activity changed on oxidative stress in 90-21-3 (K-tolerant) and D937 (K-sensitive) under K deficiency stress.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Two genotypic difference maize, 90-21-3 (K-tolerant) and D937 (K-sensitive), were screened from more than total 2000 lines cultivated based on growth and yield for over ten years in Liaozhong County of China that K fertilizer has not been supplied since 2000, a naturally K deficient field (available K less than 50.4 mg∙kg−1). Then the materials were verified through the performance in field trial, pool trial and hydroponically trial in 2016. Differed from 90-21-3 that no visible symptoms, the D937 showed leaf blades turned yellow at the seedling stage under K deficiency soil. The mature 90-21-3 plants exhibited significantly higher biomass and grain yield than D937 grown in the K-deficient soil. Both 90-21-3 and D937 were from “Ludahonggu” cultivars and “Reid” cultivars in China, respectively.
The experiment was conducted by the way of hydroponic method in Shenyang Agricultural University, China. Uniform seeds were chosen and sterilized in 7% NaClO3 solution, then germinated in sterile silica sand on July 1, 2016. The seedlings with two visible leaves (about 1 week) were wiped off endosperm carefully and then transplanted into black plastic buckets containing nutrient solution. Random block arrangement was repeated four times. The component was 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution modified from Cao et al. [17], and containing (μmol/L) 2000 Ca(NO3)2, 2000 NaNO3, 2500 KCl, 1000 MgSO4, 500 NH4H2PO4, 100 EDTA-Fe(II), 22.5 MnCl2, 115 H3BO3, 0.75 ZnSO4, 0.16 CuSO4, and 0.182 (NH4)6Mo7O24. The solution was regulated by 0.1 mol NaOH and HCl to pH 6.0. Air added into the buckets through air stone that provided oxygen for roots at a rate of 40 min h−1.
After seven days of cultivation, one half seedlings were transferred into new nutrient solution (controls), while the rest were carefully washed by deionized water more than 3 times, and then transferred into boxes with K-deficient nutrient solution. The roots were sampled after detached and washed with deionized water after 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, or 7 d of K deficiency treatment, and frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen prior to measurement of osmoprotectants, ROS, and antioxidase activity.
2.2. Biochemical Analysis2.2.1. Osmoprotectants
The proline concentration was estimated by monitoring the absorbance of reactant between acid indene and proline at 528 nm with an UV-VIS spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lambda 365, USA) as described by Ashraf and Zafar [18]. Free amino acid concentration was analyzed by color-developing reagent (triketohydrindene hydrate) at 530 nm according to Hajlaoui et al. [6]. Soluble sugar content was measured by monitoring the absorbance of anthrone reagent at 630 nm according to Wan et al. [19]. Soluble protein contents were analyzed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (G-250) solution at 595 nm according to Bradford [20].
2.2.2. O<sub>2</sub>∙<sup>−</sup>, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and MDA
Superoxide anion (O2∙−) production was estimated by monitoring the absorbance of reactant among hydroxylamine hydrochloride, a-naphthylamine and enzyme solution at 530 nm with an UV-VIS spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lambda 365, USA) according to Tian et al. [21]. The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) level was estimated by the increased absorbance of reactant between extracting solution and 0.1% titanium chloride in 20% (v/v) H2SO4 at 410 nm as described by Tsai et al. [22]. The malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured with thiobarbituric acid at 532 nm and 600 nm as described in Mir et al. [23].
2.2.3. SOD, POD, and CAT
The enzyme extraction was performed according to Grace and Logan [24]. Enzymatic protein was extracted with 50 mM/L cold phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 0.1 mM EDTA and 2% PVP. The supernatant solution was centrifuged at 15,000 g at 4˚C to determine enzymatic assays.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined by the absorbance at 560 nm as described by Neto et al. [25]. One unit of enzyme activity was regarded as the value of SOD required to produce a 50% inhibition of reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium. POD and CAT activities were tested according to Tian et al. [21]. One unit of POD activity was defined as the increase in the absorbance of 0.01 min−1 per gram fresh weight at 470 nm. One unit of CAT was defined as the decrease in absorbance of 0.01 min−1 per gram fresh weight at 240 nm.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Four replicates of each treatment were performed to an analysis of variance with the SPSS19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between mean values were tested using the least significant difference (LSD) at a probability level of 0.05, which were indicated by different letters. All tables and figures were made using the Excel 2013.
3. Results3.1. Growth
Compared with controls, total dry weight of 90-21-3 and D937 were decreased by 13.62% and 27.83% under K deficiency stress at 7 d, respectively (Figure 1(a)). The root and shoot weight of 90-21-3 were decreased by 7.90% and 13.15% in comparison with the controls after 7 d of K-starvation, and significantly decreased
by 25.59% and 26.54% in D937 (Figure 1(b) and Figure 1(c)), respectively. Obviously, more reduction in shoots than in roots of 90-21-3 and D937 was showed under K deficiency treatment. The root to shoot ratio (R/S) was significantly increased by 23.23% for 90-21-3 at 7 d of K-deficiency, but less dramatically increased in D937 (Figure 1(d)).
3.2. ROS and MDA Content
O2∙− accumulated in two genotypes under K-free treatment (Figure 2(a)). In 90-21-3, the O2∙− concentration in the root increased rapidly by 18.06% and 13.55% at 1 d and 3 d relative to controls after K withdrawal, but just 3.45% and 1.02% at 5 d and 7 d, respectively. In D937, however, the O2∙− concentration in D937 was increased by 10.38% and 6.03% than the control at 1 d and 3 d, and significantly increased by 26.65% and 13.04% at 5 d and 7 d of K deficiency, respectively. The H2O2 in 90-21-3 was little changed, but significantly increased by 27.65% in root of D937 after 7 d of K-deficiency treatment (Figure 2(b)). MDA in root of D937 was significantly increased by 41.04% and 40.26% in comparison
with the controls after 5 d and 7 d of K-starvation, and higher than the observed increases of 11.86% and 13.13% in 90-21-3 (Figure 2(c)).
3.3. Osmoprotectants Content
As shown in Figure 3(a), proline in D937 was significantly increased by 25.86% after 1 d of K-free starvation, and significantly increased by 9.62%, 12.03%, 21.15%, and 26.22% in 90-21-3 at 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, and 7 d, respectively. An increase of free amino acids in roots of both lines responded to K-deficient treatment conditions (Figure 3(b)). The amount in 90-21-3 was significantly increased by 26.19%, 20.35%, 14.33%, and 24.63% relative to controls after 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, and 7 d, respectively, of K withdrawal, and 10.20%, 9.54%, 11.70%, and 19.66%, respectively, in D937.
As shown in Figure 3(c), K deficiency treatment positively stimulated soluble sugar in 90-21-3 and D937. Compared with controls, 90-21-3 was increased by 20.79% after 5 d of K deficiency, respectively, and increased of 9.99% in D937. Contrary to the variation of soluble sugar, the soluble protein in both roots was decreased under K-deficiency treatment (Figure 3(d)). The soluble protein in
90-21-3 was decreased by 7.69% at 7 d under K-deficiency treatment, and decreased by 15.57% in D937, respectively.
3.4. Antioxidase Activity
SOD activity in 90-21-3 and D937 was dramatically increased by 24.51% and 10.55% in comparison to controls after 1d of K-starvation, respectively (Figure 4(a)). However, the D937 was significantly decreased by 15.04%, 17.42%, and 6.90% at 3 d, 5 d and 7 d treatment after K withdrawal, but increase of 14.47%, 13.20%, and 3.24% in 90-21-3. Compared with controls, the POD activity in root of 90-21-3 was differently increased by 20.86% at 7 d, but significantly decreased by 11.86% in D937 (Figure 4(b)). CAT enzyme activity in 90-21-3 and D937 were dramatically increased after 1 d of K starvation stress (Figure 4(c)). After 5 d of K-deficiency stress, the CAT kept higher activity in 90-21-3 than in the control, but there was a significant decrease of 11.79% in D937, compared to without treatment.
4. Discussion
Root system played an essential role in process of nutrient absorption, hormone
synthesis, organic acids and amino acids exudation, etc. K+, as a monovalent cation, is involved in physiological processes such as determining the osmotic potential and enzyme activation. However, the rhizosphere is often in a state of K deficiency due to low absorption of roots grown in soil with low available K content. K deficiency could inhibit plant growth by damage of the membrane structure and hindering photosynthesis [26]. Here, the growth of 90-21-3 and D937 was obviously dropped, but 90-21-3 maintained more root weight than D937 under K-deficiency stress. Distinctly, the shoot showed more serious inhibition than the roots under K deficiency. Similar results were reported by Jordan-Meille and Pellerin [27]. Differently from Tewari et al. [28] that the reduction in R/S, in present study, R/S in 90-21-3 was more increased than D937 under K-deficiency stress. This indicated that more carbohydrate was redistributed in 90-21-3 from shoots to roots to promote root growth, allowing root exploring of larger soil to loot more K+.
Osmoregulation is an important mechanism involved in the defense against stress by regulating osmotic potential. Under K deficiency stress, the decreased K+ in root affected osmotic pressure in the xylem, which could inhibit long-distance sap flow from roots to shoots [29]. Biosynthesis and accumulation of organic solutes in vacuoles and the cytosol may be involved in membrane stability [30]. Proline is regarded as an osmoprotectant, ROS scavenger and inhibitor of lipid peroxidation, etc. [31]. In our study, the proline level, one sensitive of free amino acids, was greater increased with longer treatment time in 90-21-3 than in D937. The increased proline could help to balance the vacuole osmotic potential in roots and maintain the ratio of NADH/NAD+ under K deficiency to reduce the disorganization of the electron transport chain. Under a shortage of micronutrients (Zn2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+), soluble sugar was significantly increased to boost osmotic stress tolerance in two lettuce cultivars [8]. Similar results were reported in roots of alfalfa [32] and Arabidopsis [33]. K+ was involved in transportation of carbohydrate synthesized by leaf photosynthesis by way of phloem [34]. The soluble sugar in root of 90-21-3 indicated that more carbohydrates were transported into roots than to shoots, stimulating axile root elongation after K deprivation, and also was indicated by an increased root to shoot ratio [27] [35]. But, nitrate assimilation and protein synthesis were strongly impeded by K deficiency due to the altered nitrogen metabolism enzymes activities, although amino acids increased [33] [36].
Membrane lipid peroxidation was induced by an increase in ROS due to blocking electron transport under K deficiency stress. The cell structure and function could become disordered by abnormal ROS that damage nucleic acids, oxidize proteins, and cause lipid peroxidation [9]. The increased MDA value indicated the root cell was suffered from oxidative stress and more serious oxidative damage of lipids occurred in the roots of D937 than in 90-21-3, which suggested stronger scavenging ability of ROS in 90-21-3 than D937 under K deficiency conditions.
Antioxidant enzyme systems were regarded as crucial participator in scavenging and eliminating ROS in plants. Evidences indicated that stress-tolerant genotypes may promote defense system depending on enhancement of antioxidant enzymes [16]. The accumulation of oxidative damage in potassium-starved maize seedlings indicated disruption of the balanced state between ROS production and antioxidant defense system. The SOD activity decreased in D937 and O2∙− accumulated with time of K deficiency, but 90-21-3 remained high activity in 90-21-3. Although O2∙− could be translated into H2O2 by disproportionate of SOD to mitigate the damage of O2∙−, H2O2 continued to act as a destructor and could be eliminated by conversion to H2O through the action of POD and CAT enzymes [37]. Here, the dates showed H2O2 was induced to explode in response to potassium deficiency treatments, with increased POD and CAT activity. However, the POD and CAT activities of D937 were depressed, but higher enzymatic activity was observed in 90-21-3, especially POD activity. Maintaining higher activity of SOD enzymes and coordinated expression of antioxidant enzymes could improve the ability of plants to resist ROS [38]. These results suggested 90-21-3 could promote high SOD, POD and CAT enzyme activity to scavenge ROS and decreased membrane lipid peroxidation under K deficiency.
In conclusion, the root growth of 90-21-3 and D937 was inhibited due to osmotic stress and oxidative stress under K deficiency, and more carbohydrate in 90-21-3 was translated into root. Compared with D937, 90-21-3 was able to rapidly accumulate proline, free amino acid and soluble sugar to keep the osmotic potential to alleviate osmotic stress and enhanced SOD, POD and CAT activity to promote the ability of degrading ROS after potassium starvation, alleviating the oxidative stress, which provided steady growth of root.
Acknowledgements
This program was jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771725).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Du, Q., Zou, T., Geng, L.Y., Zhang, W., Wang, X.G., Yu, H.Q. and Zhao, X.H. (2021) Changes in Osmotic Adjustment and Antioxidant Enzyme in Maize (Zeamays L.) Root Exposed to K Deficiency. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 10, 359-371. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2021.103023
ReferencesWang, Y., He, L., Li, H.D., Xu, J. and Wu, W.H. (2010) Potassium Channel Alpha-Subunit AtKC1 Negatively Regulates AKT1-Mediated K+ Uptake in Arabidopsis Roots under Low-K+ Stress. Cell Research, 20, 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.74Hu. W., Lv, X., Yang, J., Chen, B., Zhao, W., Meng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z. and Oosterhuis, D.M. (2016) Effects of Potassium Deficiency on Antioxidant Metabolism Related to Leaf Senescence in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Research, 191, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.025Zorb, C., Senbayram, M. and Peiter, E. (2014) Potassium in Agriculture: Status and Perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology, 171, 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008Cesco, S., Neumann, G., Tomasi, N., Pinton, R. and Weisskopf, L. (2010) Release of Plant-Borne Flavonoids into the Rhizosphere and Their Role in Plant Nutrition. Plant and Soil, 329, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0266-9Farhangi-Abriz, S. and Torabian, S. (2016) Antioxidant Enzyme and Osmotic Adjustment Changes in Bean Seedlings as Affected by Biochar under Salt Stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 137, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.029Hajlaoui. H., Ayeb, N.E., Garrec, J.P. and Denden M. (2010) Differential Effects of Salt Stress on Osmotic Adjustment and Solutes Allocation on the Basis of Root and Leaf Tissue Senescence of Two Silage Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties. Industrial Crops and Products, 31, 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.09.007Kronzucker, H.J. and Britto, D.T. (2011) Sodium Transport in Plants: A Critical Review. New Phytologist, 189, 54-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03540.xRoosta, H.R., Estaji, A. and Niknam, F. (2018) Effect of Iron, Zinc and Manganese Shortage-Induced Change on Photosynthetic Pigments, Some Osmoregulators and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Lettuce. Photosynthetica, 56, 606-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0696-1Hernandez, M., Fernandez-Garcia, N., Garcia-Garma, J., Rubio-Asensio, J.S., Rubio, F. and Olmos, E. (2012) Potassium Starvation Induces Oxidative Stress in Solanum lycopersicum L. Roots. Journal of Plant Physiology, 169, 1366-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.05.015Foyer, C.H., Descourvières, P. and Kunert, K.J. (2006) Protection against Oxygen Radicals: An Important Defence Mechanism Studied in Transgenic Plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 17, 507-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00146.xSpychalla, J.P. and Desborough, S.L. (1990) Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase, and α-Tocopherol Content of Stored Potato Tubers. Plant Physiology, 94, 1214-1218. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.3.1214Shin, R. and Schachtman, D.P. (2004) Hydrogen Peroxide Mediates Plant Root Cell Response to Nutrient Deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 8827-8832. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401707101Min, J.K., Ciani, S. and Schachtman, D.P. (2010) A Peroxidase Contributes to ROS Production during Arabidopsis Root Response to Potassium Deficiency. Molecular Plant, 3, 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssp121Olmos, E. and Hellin, E. (1996) Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in a Cell Line of Pisumsativum: Biochemical and Physiological Aspects. Plant Science, 120, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04483-4Ennajeh, M., Vadel, A.M. and Khemira, H. (2009) Osmoregulation and Osmoprotection in the Leaf Cells of Two Olive Cultivars Subjected to Severe Water Deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 31, 711-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0283-6Chen, S., Zhao, H., Ding, G. and Xu, F. (2015) Genotypic Differences in Antioxidant Response to Phosphorus Deficiency in Brassica napus. Plant and Soil, 391, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2395-7Cao, M.J., Yu, H.Q., Yan, H.K. and Jiang, C.J. (2007) Difference in Tolerance to Potassium Deficiency between Two Maize Inbred Lines. Plant Production Science, 10, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.42Ashraf, M. and Zafar, Z.U. (1997) Effect of Potassium Deficiency on Growth and Some Biochemical Characteristics in Two Lines of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 19, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-997-0016-7Wan, Y.Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhou, Z.Q., Li, X., Shi, Q., Wang, X.J. and Bai, J.G. (2015) Caffeic Acid Protects Cucumber against Chilling Stress by Regulating Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Proline and Soluble Sugar Contents. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, Article No. 1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1706-6Bradford, M.M. (1976) A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3Tian, M., Gu, Q. and Zhu, M. (2003) The Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide and Antioxidant Enzymes in the Process of Shoot Organogenesis of Strawberry Callus. Plant Science, 165, 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00224-3Tsai, Y.C., Hong, C.Y., Liu, L.F. and Kao, C.H. (2004) Relative Importance of Na+ and Cl- in NaCl-Induced Antioxidant Systems in Roots of Rice Seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum, 122, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00387.xMir, B.A., Mir, S.A., Khazir,J., Tonfack, L.B., Cowan, D.A., Vyas, D. and Koul, S. (2015) Cold Stress Affects Antioxidative Response and Accumulation of Medicinally Important Withanolides in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Industrial Crops and Products, 74, 1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.012Grace, S.C. and Logan, B.A. (1996) Acclimation of Foliar Antioxidant Systems to Growth Irradiance in Three Broad-Leaved Evergreen Species. Plant Physiology, 112, 1631-1640. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.4.1631Neto, A.D.D.A., Prisco, J.T., Enéas-Filho, J., Abreu, C.E.B.D. and Gomes-Filho, E. (2006) Effect of Salt Stress on Antioxidative Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation in Leaves and Roots of Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Sensitive Maize Genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008Gerardeaux, E., Jordan-Meille, L., Constantin, J., Pellerin, S. and Dingkuhn, M. (2010) Changes in Plant Morphology and Dry Matter Partitioning Caused by Potassium Deficiency in Gossypium hirsutum (L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67, 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.09.008Jordan-Meille, L. and Pellerin, S. (2008) Shoot and Root Growth of Hydroponic Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by K Deficiency. Plant and Soil, 304, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9534-8Tewari, R.K., Kumar, P., Tewari, N., Srivastava, S. and Sharma, P.N. (2004) Macronutrient Deficiencies and Differential Antioxidant Responses Influence on the Activity and Expression of Superoxide Dismutase in Maize. Plant Science, 166, 687-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.004Lebaudy, A., Véry, A.A. and Sentenac, H. (2007) K+ Channel Activity in Plants: Genes, Regulations and Functions. FEBS Letters, 581, 2357-2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.058Fu, C., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, Y. and Wang Y.A. (2015) Morphology, Photosynthesis, and Internal Structure Alterations in Field Apple Leaves under Hidden and Acute Zinc Deficiency. Scientia Horticulturae, 193, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.016Trovato, M., Mattioli, R. and Costantino, P. (2008) Multiple Roles of Proline in Plant Stress Tolerance and Development. Rendiconti Lincei, 19, 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-008-0022-8Li, R., Volenec, J.J. Joern, B.C. and Cunningham, S.M. (1997) Potassium and Nitrogen Effects on Carbohydrate and Protein Metabolism in Alfalfa Roots. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 20, 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169709365271Armengaud, P., Sulpice, R., Miller, A.J., Stitt, M., Amtmann, A. and Gibon, Y. (2009) Multilevel Analysis of Primary Metabolism Provides New Insights into the Role of Potassium Nutrition for Glycolysis and Nitrogen Assimilation in Arabidopsis Roots. Plant Physiology, 150, 772-785. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.133629Tang, Z.H., Zhang, A.J., Wei, M., Chen, X.G., Liu, Z.H., Li, H.M. and Ding, Y.F. (2015) Physiological Response to Potassium Deficiency in Three Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) Genotypes Differing in Potassium Utilization Efficiency. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, Article No. 184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1901-0Xu, W., Cui, K., Xu, A., Nie, L., Huang, J. and Peng, S. (2015) Drought Stress Condition Increases Root to Shoot Ratio via Alteration of Carbohydrate Partitioning and Enzymatic Activity in Rice Seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, Article No. 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1760-0Wang, N., Hua, H., Egrinya, E.A., Li, Z., Duan, L. and Tian, X. (2012) Genotypic Variations in Photosynthetic and Physiological Adjustment to Potassium Deficiency in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 110, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.02.002Apel, K. and Hirt, H. (2004) Reactive Oxygen Species: Metabolism, Oxidative Stress, and Signal Transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 728-749. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701Scandalios, J.G. (1993) Oxygen Stress and Superoxide Dismutases. Plant Physiology, 101, 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.101.1.7