<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.118089</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-111053</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparative Study between Shortened versus Standard Protocols of Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate Regimen in the Treatment of Eclampsia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nermeen</surname><given-names>Mohamed Hefila</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tamer</surname><given-names>Mamdouh Abdeldayem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>07</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>935</fpage><lpage>939</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>3,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Eclampsia is one of the most 
  sever
  , 
  life
  -
  threatening
   diseases occurred in pregnancy, MgSO<sub>4</sub> is the best drug used for its treatment. In this study, 
  the 
  comparison
   between shortened regimen of MgSO<sub>4</sub> versus standard Zuspan course in controlling eclampsia was done. This study performed along one year (July 2019-July 2020) at El Shatby Maternity University Hospital, 40 eclamptic patients presenting at the emergency unit were randomized. Group A received the standard Zuspan regimen of magnesium sulphate and group B received short course in which the patients received only two doses of intravenous magnesium sulphate four hours apart postpartal. Results: The maternal outcomes regarding recurrence of the fits were compared. The maternal complications and postpartal fits were
   the
   same in both groups. The dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub> in the shortened group was decreased by 40% in 42.5% of the cases. Conclusions: The shortened course of MgSO<sub>4</sub> postpartal is the same as the standard regimen in the controlling eclampsia.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>MgSO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;</kwd><kwd> Eclampsia</kwd><kwd> MgSO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Protocols</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Eclampsia is known as grand mal seizure activity newly happened during pregnancy or postpartally in pregnant women known with preeclampsia during pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Eclampsia is a strong cause of maternal deaths worldwide. Eclampsia is associated with approximately 13% of maternal deaths worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref2">2</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>MgSO<sub>4</sub> is the best drug used for reducing the incidence of eclampsia intrapartum and/or postpartum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref3">3</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>MgSO<sub>4</sub> is the drug that the World Health Organization is recommending as the most effective, available and safe anticonvulsant treatment for severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref4">4</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>There are two main courses available for MgSO<sub>4</sub> treatment:</p><p>1) In the Pritchard Regimen, 4 g of MgSO<sub>4</sub> is the starting loading dose, given slowly over 5 - 10 minutes intravenously followed by 10 g intramuscularly (5 g in each gluteal muscle). Subsequently, then every 4 hours, 5 g is given intramuscularly into alternate gluteal muscle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>2) In the Zuspan regimen,4 g is given slowly as the loading dose intravenously slowly over 5 - 10 min followed by 1 - 2 g infusion, the maintenance dose, every hour by an infusion pump [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>About 40% of serum MgSO<sub>4</sub> is bound to protein after its administration. The unbound MgSO<sub>4</sub> ion diffuses into the different body tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref5">5</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>The clinical and toxicity effect of magnesium sulphate is correlated to its plasma concentration. 1.8 to 3.0 mmol/L plasma level of MgSO<sub>4</sub> is the proper treatment of eclamptic fits. The dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub> and its serum concentration for prophylaxis is not estimated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref5">5</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>The warning sign of impending MgSO<sub>4</sub> toxicity in the mother firstly is loss of the patellar reflex with MgSO<sub>4</sub> serum level between 3.5 and 5 mmol/L [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref5">5</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>Magnesium sulphate toxicity is rare specially with close monitoring during treatment, but reducing the amount and duration of its treatment to reduce its adverse effects and reduce patient discomfort was the main concern of many researches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref7">7</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>In this study, comparison between the effectiveness of a shortened course of MgSO<sub>4</sub> postpartally to the standard regimen in prevention of postpartal fits was done.<sup> </sup></p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients</title><p>The study was applied on 40 cases of eclamptic mothers divided in two groups A and B in which A received standard regimen and B received shortened regimen. Study was performed at Elshatby Maternity university hospital after approval of the ethics committee and signing the consent to be involved in this study. All the cases presented with history of preeclamptic toxemia or history of hypertension newly diagnosed in pregnancy came with eclamptic fits were included. Cases with history of recent epileptic fits, drug toxicity and chronic neurologic or psychological disease were excluded.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Method</title><p>Patients were divided into two groups, A and B.</p><p>In the group A, with standard course, MgSO<sub>4</sub> loading dose of 4 g is given IV followed by 5 g IV every 4 hours as maintenance dose for 24 hours postpartally.</p><p>In the group B, the loading dose is the same but the maintenance dose was limited to two doses of 5 g MgSO<sub>4</sub> given IV with 4 hours intervals postpartally or after the last eclamptic seizures.</p><p>In both regimens, 2 gm of MgSO<sub>4</sub> was given IV in cases of recurrence fit.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>Statistical analysis was done on 40 cases of eclamptic mothers divided in two groups A and B in which A received standard regimen and B received shortened regimen.</p><p>The recurrence of fits was not significantly different among the two groups (p = 0.229). In group B, we found a significant reduction in the whole dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub>.</p><p>The fits recurrence, occurred in 15% in the MgSO<sub>4</sub> short course group which was not significantly different from the 10% fits recurrence in the standard regimen group.</p><p>According to fits about 40% presented antepartum and 45% postpartum and the remaining (15%) presented intrapartum the reduction in dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub> in group B as short course MgSO<sub>4</sub>, the total dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub> required was reduced to 14 g in 42.5% of the patients. This is more than 40% reduction in the whole dose of MgSO<sub>4</sub> of 34 - 38 g required in 60% of the patients in the standard regimen.</p><p>Maternal outcomes were similar in the two groups as they have been followed for 6 weeks postpartally till they came for contraception counselling. The short course regimen got the benefit of low cost and less chance of drug toxicity without compromising quality of care (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>In our study, by reducing the duration of magnesium sulfate infusion, we have</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the two studied groups according to fits</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fits</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group A (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group B (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >χ<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antepartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.576</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ><sup>MC</sup>p = 0.829</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intrapartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.143</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ><sup>FE</sup>p = 1.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recurrence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.229</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ><sup>FE</sup>p = 1.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>χ<sup>2</sup>, p: χ<sup>2</sup> and p values for Chi square test for comparing between the two groups.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the two studied groups according to dose of magnesium sulphate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group A (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group B (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test of Sig.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose of mg sulphate (gm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ><sup>FE</sup>p = 0.487</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min. - Max.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.0 - 38.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >14.0 - 18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >t = 53.774<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.30 &#177; 0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >14.60 &#177; 1.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >14.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>χ<sup>2</sup>, p: χ<sup>2</sup> and p values for Chi square test for comparing between the two groups; FE: Fisher Exact for Chi square test for comparing between group A and B; t, p: t and p values for Student t-test for comparing between the two groups; *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.</p><p>achieved reduction in the MgSO<sub>4</sub> whole dose, thereby safeguarding the patients against the untoward effects of MgSO<sub>4</sub> toxicity.</p><p>About 40% presented antepartum and 45% postpartum and the remaining few (15%) presented intrapartum, compared with Nigerian study done by Ado D. Geidamet al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref8">8</xref>] was 32% antepartum and 15% postpartum.</p><p>This comparative study supported that the short course MgSO<sub>4</sub> is as effective as the standard regimen in the treatment of eclampsia.</p><p>This was explained by recurrence fits rate between two groups is nearly similar with using short course of MgSO<sub>4</sub> as the same findings of Nigerian study done by Ado D. Geidam et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref8">8</xref>] purposing to decrease risk of drug toxicity and drug cost [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.111053-ref9">9</xref>].<sup> </sup></p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>MgSO<sub>4</sub> short protocol treatment of eclamptic fits is as effective as the standard protocol of MgSO<sub>4</sub> treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Compliance with Ethics Requirements</title><p>All Institutional and National Guidelines for the care and use of animals (insects) were followed.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>DE designed the study and performed data collection and analysis. MR interpreted and supervised the Lab analysis results. NE and NH supervised the clinical examinations and US findings. DE wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in the revision of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hefila, N.M. and Abdeldayem, T.M. (2021) Comparative Study between Shortened versus Standard Protocols of Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate Regimen in the Treatment of Eclampsia. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 935-939. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.118089</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.111053-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mattar, F. and Sibai, B.M. (2000) Eclampsia. VIII. Risk Factors for Maternal Morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182, 307-312.  
ttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70216-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warrington, J.P. (2015) Placental Ischemia Increases Seizure Susceptibility and Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytokines. Physiological Reports, 3, e12634.  
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12634</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sibai, B.M. (1990) Eclampsia. VI. Maternal-Perinatal Outcome in 254 Consecutive Cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163, 1049-1054.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)91123-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duley, L., Matar, H.E., Almerie, M.Q. and Hall, D.R. (2011) Alternative Magnesium Sulfate Regimens for Women with Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia: RHL Commentary. World Health Organization [WHO], Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flowers Jr., C.E., Easterling Jr., W.E., White, F.D., Jung, J.M. and Fox Jr., J.T. (1962) Magnesium Sulfate in Toxemia of Pregnancy. New Dosage Schedule Based on Body Weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 19, 315-327.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zuspan, F.P. (1978) Problems Encountered in the Treatment of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. A Point of View. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 131, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(78)90816-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lakshmi, R., Upreti, D., Agrawal, A. and Raina, A. (2007) Late Postpartum Eclampsia at Five Weeks Post-Delivery. Singapore Medical Journal, 48, 946-947.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chama, C.M., Geidam, A.D., Bako, B., Mairiga, A.G. and Atterwahmie, A. (2013) A Shortened versus Standard Matched Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate Regimen in the Treatment of Eclampsia: A Randomised Controlled Trial. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 17, 131-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.111053-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isler, C.M., Barrilleaux, P.S., Rinehart, B.K., Magann, E.F. and Martin Jr., J.N. (2003) Postpartum Seizure Prophylaxis: Using Maternal Clinical Parameters to Guide Therapy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101, 66-69.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200307000-00046</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>