<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2021.127080</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-110959</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Management of Wilt Complex of Eggplant (&lt;i&gt;Solanum melongena&lt;/i&gt; L.) Caused by &lt;i&gt;Fusarium oxysporum, Ralstonia solanacearum&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Meloidogyne&lt;/i&gt; spp.
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nahid</surname><given-names>Akter</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>Rafiqul Islam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>Belal Hossain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>Nazrul Islam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shukti</surname><given-names>Rani Chowdhury</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanzida</surname><given-names>Hoque</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rakibul</surname><given-names>Hasan Nitol</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rubina</surname><given-names>Tasnin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Plant Pathology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1155</fpage><lpage>1171</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Wilt complex disease of eggplant is a severe problem in Bangladesh as well as in the world. The pathogenic variability and their survival nature make the disease complex. The pathogen includes a fungus (
  Fusarium oxysporum), 
  a
   
  bacterium (
  Ralstonia solanacearum)
   and a nematode (
  Meloidogyne 
  spp.) that attack the plant individually or combinedly. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the integrated effects of different chemicals, poultry manure and 
  Trichoderma harzianum
   to manage the disease. Carbendazim (Autos
  tin 50WP), Streptomycin sulphate 9% and Tetracycline hydrochloride 1% (Krosin 10SP) and Carbofuran (Furadan 3G) were used as a fungicide, bactericide and nematicide, respectively which were integrated with poultry manure and 
  Trichoderma harzianum 
  resulting in sixteen treatments
  .
   The treatment efficacy varied significantly in comparison to control in respect of wilt incidence, yield and yield contributing characters. No wilt incidence was observed where 
  Trichoderma harzianum 
  was applied individually or in combination with Furadan 3G, Krosin 10SP, Autostin 50WP and poultry manure. The highest yield increase (300%) over control was noted in the treatment where Krosin 10SP, Furadan 3G, 
  Trichoderma harzianum 
  and Poultry manure were applied combinedly. The same treatment showed the best performance over control by 32%, 29%, 60%, 53% in case of the number of branches, number of leaves, number of fruits and fruit length, respectively. This treatment (Krosin 10SP + Furadan 3G + 
  Trichoderma sp.
   + Poultry manure) also provided the highest Benefit Cost Ration (5.68).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Eggplant</kwd><kwd> Integrated Management</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Evaluation</kwd><kwd> Bioagent</kwd><kwd> Wilt Complex Disease</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is one of the most important and highly productive vegetable crops in the tropical and sub-tropical region of the world. It is cultivated widely in Indian sub-continent for its year-round availability, food value, taste, cash crop and also as an export commodity. It is the second most important vegetable crop in Bangladesh with respect to acreage and production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref1">1</xref>]. However, production and yield rate of eggplant in Bangladesh is abysmal compared to other countries like India, Japan, China, etc., due to infection by different diseases. Eggplant cultivation is significantly impaired by wilt complex caused by Fusariumoxysporum, Ralstoniasolanacearum and Meloidogynespp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref3">3</xref>]. Nematodes facilitate fungi and bacteria to cause infection by creating wounds. The fungus and bacteria infect the vascular system of the plant and disrupt water and nutrient transportation resulting in wilt incidence. Nemic wilt shows knot/gall formation in the root system and the plants become weak due to the hindrance of water and nutrient uptake. The interaction of fungus, bacteria and nematode is called wilt complex and could be seen even in the same plant.</p><p>Farmers often face substantial crop loss due to the wilt complex resulting in severe economic losses. In case of bacterial wilt, 100% of the affected plants may collapse in the kitchen gardens of Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref4">4</xref>] while the severity is 10% - 90% in field conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref6">6</xref>]. For fungal wilt, the fruit yield is reduced by 20% - 30% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref7">7</xref>], and it may turn into epidemic by complete crop failure in the winter season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref8">8</xref>]. Nemic wilt (Meloidogynespp.) solely may cause 27.2% yield loss of eggplant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref9">9</xref>], and it may rise to 80% in solanaceous crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>The standard control measures against wilt complex include the use of resistant varieties, crop rotation, agronomic practices, biological control and integrated management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref11">11</xref>]. However, cultural practices and crop rotation may provide limited control of Ralstonia solanacearum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref13">13</xref>]. Discriminate uses of chemical pesticides create a harmful effect on the environment and ecology that leads the eggplants with residual effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref14">14</xref>]. Due to this, the export of eggplants from Bangladesh is restricted, which is alarming for the host country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>Integration of plant health management strategies (soil amendments, biocontrol agent and judicious use of fungicide, bactericide and nematicides) is now considered an effective approach emphasizing the environment, economics and social acceptance compared to conventional management. Trichoderma spp. is a well-documented biocontrol agent against a lot of soil and seed-borne pathogens for its antagonism, mycoparasitism and competition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref18">18</xref>]. T. harzianum and T. viride reported complete inhibition of mycelial growth of Fusariumoxysporum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref19">19</xref>]. Bactericides and biocontrol agents are reported effective against Ralstoniasolanacearum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref20">20</xref>]. Organic residues supply plant nutrients and increase natural suppressiveness of the soil against soil-borne pathogens and improve physio-chemical and biological characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref21">21</xref>]. Suppression of Ralstoniasolanacearum is seen in poultry manure amended soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref22">22</xref>]. Carbofuran is the most effective nematicide in controlling Meloidogyne sp. in warm weather conditions. Moreover, integration of poultry manure, bioagent and carbofuran considerably reduce gall index and give higher fruit yield over control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref23">23</xref>]. The present research work has been designed to formulate an integrated approach using those eco-friendly options for the management of wilt complex of eggplant.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Isolation and Identification of Pathogens</title><p>Fusariumoxysporum and Ralstoniasolanacearum were isolated from the infected stem of eggplant, and Meloidogyne spp. was isolated from the knots of the infected root. F. oxysporum was purified by hyphal tip culture method from the diseased stem by blotter method and was identified by the key characters (CMI) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The bacterial wilt of an infected plant was confirmed by bacterial ooze test by making the water turbid. From the serial dilution of ooze suspension, 100 &#181;L of each concentration was poured followed by spreading with a sterilized spreader onto the surface of the solidified TTC media. The inoculated plates were incubated at 32˚C for 48 hours. The isolated bacterium was streaked on CPG and NA media and was identified as R. solanacearum by morphological and colony characters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref24">24</xref>] and gram staining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref25">25</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The roots of nemic wilted plant were washed gently under running tap water. A branch of root bearing knots was examined under a stereomicroscope, and a number of egg masses were noticed. A single egg mass of the root knot was picked up in semi-permanent slide and crushed for studying under the compound microscope. An adult pear-shaped female nematode was pulled from the hole which was seen after removing an egg mass and identified as Meloidogyne spp. By</p><p>observing under stereo and compound microscope (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. In Vitro Assay of Fungicide and Bactericide</title><p>The fungicide Autostin 50WP (Carbendazim) (Supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) was assayed against Fusariumoxysporum by Food Poisoning Technique, cup or groove method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref26">26</xref>]. Five mm disc of PDA media in each petri plate was scooped from 3 places maintaining an equal distance from the centre using a sterilized disc cutter. After putting Autostin 50WP (0.1%) solution into each hole, the plates were kept overnight for the diffusion of fungicide into the medium. 5 mm mycelial discs of 7 days old culture of Fusariumoxysporum were taken and placed at the centre of the diffused PDA plates. The plates with holes filled with sterile water were served as control. All the plates were incubated at 25˚C &#177; 2˚C for seven days, and mycelial growth of Fusariumoxysporum was recorded. The percent inhibition of mycelial growth was calculated using the formula used by Islam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref26">26</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref27">27</xref>]. Bioassay of antibacterial Krosin 10SP (Streptomycin sulphate 9% and Tetracycline hydrochloride 1%) (Supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) against Ralstoniasolanacearum was done by zone inhibition method. 10 ml nutrient broth in a test tube was inoculated with 48 hours old pure culture of bacteria grown on NA media plate. After shaking in a shaker incubator at 30˚C and 150 rpm for 24 hours, the broth culture was spread uniformly on TTC media plate using the sterile cotton swabs. 5 mm disc was scooped and filled with Krosin 10SP suspension (0.05%) while inoculated plates filled with sterile water was treated as control. The plates were incubated at 30˚C in incubation chamber for 48 hours, and the diameter of the inhibition zone was measured.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Pathogenicity Test for the Causal Pathogens</title><p>The root-dip assay modified from Ramaiah and Garampalli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref19">19</xref>] was followed for pathogenicity test of Fusariumoxysporum. Seedlings with wounded roots were submerged for 10 min in the conidial suspension (1 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> ml<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) obtained from 7 days old culture of Fusariumoxysporum on. In the case of Ralstoniasolanacearum, 5 ml spore suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFU ml<sup>−1</sup>) was injected into the vascular system of the 25 days old seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The plants expressing wilt symptoms were selected. The fungus and bacterium were re-isolated from the symptom and compared with the previous culture of Fusariumoxysporumon and</p><p>Ralstoniasolanacearum, respectively to satisfy the Koch’s postulates. Egg masses were picked up from the roots, kept for hatching in water for 24 to 36 hours. The hatched second stage (J2) juveniles were allowed to inoculate 21 days old seedlings of eggplant. After 100 to 150 days when the nematodes complete 2 - 3 generations, the root galls were explored for confirmation of the causal nematode. In each case, uninoculated plants served as a positive control.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Integrated Experiment</title><p>Thirty-five days old seedlings of BARI hybrid begoon 3 (oblong) were transplanted in the research field of Plant Pathology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh during September, 2017. Sixteen treatments were arranged with 3 replications in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) where each plot size was 3 m<sup>2</sup> (3.0 m &#215; 1.0 m) containing 5 plants per plot with 0.6 m &#215; 0.6 m planting distance. Every treatment was placed once at each block. Treatments were T<sub>1</sub> = Autostin 50 WP (seedling treatment + foliar spray @ 0.2%); T<sub>2</sub> = Furadan 3 G (Supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) (soil treatment@ 10 g pit<sup>−1</sup>); T3 = Krosin 10SP (seedling treatment + drenching of rhizosphere soil @ 0.1%); T<sub>4</sub> = Trichoderma formulation (Soil application @ 20 g&#183;m<sup>−2</sup>: 1 &#215; 108 cfu g<sup>−1</sup> of soil); T<sub>5</sub> = Poultry manure (soil amendment @ 2 kg 3 m<sup>−2</sup>; T<sub>6</sub> = Autostin 50 WP + Trichoderma formulation; T<sub>7</sub> = Furadan 3 G + Trichoderma formulation; T<sub>8</sub> = Krosin 10SP + Trichoderma formulation; T<sub>9</sub> = Autostin 50 WP + Poultry manure; T<sub>10</sub> = Furadan 3 G + Poultry manure; T<sub>11</sub> = Krosin 10SP + Poultry manure; T<sub>12</sub> =Trichoderma formulation + Poultry manure; T<sub>13</sub> = Autostin 50 WP + Trichoderma formulation + Poultry manure; T<sub>14</sub> = Furadan 3 G + Trichoderma formulation + Krosin 10SP; T<sub>15</sub> = Krosin 10SP + Furadan 3 G + Trichoderma formulation + Poultry manure; T<sub>16</sub> = Control.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Application of Treatments</title><p>Autostin (0.2%) and Krosin (0.1%) solutions were applied for seedling-root treatment before transplanting, followed by foliar spraying. Spraying of treatments were done 3 times with 10 days’ interval after transplanting. Furadan 3G was applied in pit soil (5 gm pit<sup>−1</sup>) during transplanting of seedlings. Poultry manure was applied @ 2 kg plot<sup>−1</sup> as a soil amendment before 21 days of transplanting to the allotted plots. Spore suspension of Trichodermaharzianum. was prepared by scraping the 10 - 12 days old culture, maintaining the concentration 1 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> conidia ml<sup>−1</sup> solution. The roots of seedlings were soaked with Trichoderma suspension. The specific pit soil was treated with black gram based Trichodermaformulation (50 gm pit<sup>−1</sup>) where Black gram: peat soil: Cowdung = 1:2:1.</p><p>The Disease Incidence or severity was measured, and costing for estimation of Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) was done as exercised by Islam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref28">28</xref>] (Supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>%   Disease   Incidence / Severity = Number of infected plant ( s ) Numaber of total plant ( s ) &#215; 100</p><p>BCR = Gross return ( Tk . / ha ) &#247; Total cost of production ( Tk . / ha )</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Identification of Fusarium Oxysporum, Ralstonia Solanacearum and Meloidogyne Spp.</title><p>Initially, F. oxysporum produced white cottony mycelium on PDA media. The fungus grew slowly and with time made pink pigmentation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Several-celled and slightly curved, hyaline macro conidia were observed in PDA culture. Single-celled, hyaline, ovoid to globose micro conidia were also found from 21 days old pure culture of Fusariumoxysporum. In case of bacteria, colonies were appeared as the red coloured centre with whitish margins (virulent) within 24 - 48 hours culturing on semi selective media Tetrazolium chloride (TZC) medium. While culturing on NA media, circular, mucoid, convex, lucid coloured colonies were found (virulent). The bacterium was rod-shaped with rounded ends and gram-negative (red colour) under the compound microscope at 1000X magnification with oil immersion objective. These characteristics were matched</p><p>with Ralstonia solanacearum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). In the case of nematode, pear-shaped female surrounded by egg mass were found under stereomicroscope which was prepared from root knot and identified as Meloidogyne spp. Eggs were found ellipsoid, lack of uniformity. Larvae and adults were also observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>The findings of the present investigation coronated with the results of previous research with so much extent. Nelson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref29">29</xref>] and Joshi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref30">30</xref>] described that the colony appearances of F. oxysporum on PDA, which was highly variable. The pink colony colour and white cottony mycelium is formed on PDA media. Three types of asexual spores viz. macroconidia, microconidia and chlamydospore were produced. Macroconidia are slightly curved, sickle shaped and 4 - 5 celled where microconidia are round/globose and single-celled. Kumar &amp; Sarma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref31">31</xref>] and Dhital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref32">32</xref>] narrated that Ralstonia solanacearum is a soil-borne aerobic, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming, gram-negative bacterium. Colonies of Ralstonia solanacearum appear as red coloured with whitish margins (virulent) on TTC medium which was highly fluidal. Circular, mucoid, convex, lucid coloured colonies were found on NA medium with respect to some samples. The pear-shaped female nematode of Meloidogyne sp. produced a huge number of knots or galls in the root system, and egg masses were attached with the knots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref33">33</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Pathogenicity Test</title><p>The pathogenicity of Fusariumoxysporum, Ralstonia solanacearum and Meloidogynespp. was satisfied the Koch’s postulates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). In Fusariumoxysporum, the inoculated plants showed wilt symptom after 20 - 30 days of post-inoculation. But in the case of bacteria, it was taken only one week for wilting. In contrast, the control plants were symptomless. On reisolation, the colonies were found to be similar to that fungus and bacteria inoculated previously. In the case of Meloidogyne spp., knots were found on the root system after 100 - 150 days of inoculation. Female nematode, egg masses and juveniles were similar to the previousMeloidogyne spp.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Evaluation of Chemicals against Isolated Pathogens</title><p>The antipathogenic activity of different chemicals were evaluated using the poison plate method. The chemicals tested in the present study showed a gradual decline in growth of associated pathogens even in low concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). Autostin 50 WP (0.1%) and Krosin 10SP (0.05%) exhibited potent antifungal and antibacterial activity against Fusariumoxysporum and Ralstoniasolanacearum, respectively. Autostin 50WP (0.1%) and Krosin 10SP (0.05%) were found to be effective and gave 81% and 87% reduction of growth of Fusariumoxysporum and Ralstoniasolanacearum, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title>In vitro assay of Autostin 50 WP again st of Fusarium oxysporum</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Redial mycelial growth (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibitionovercontrol = Radialgrowthofpathogenin ( control − treated ) plate Radialgrowthofpathogenincontrolplate &#215; 100</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Autostion 50 WP @ 1% (Carbendazim)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control (Sterile water)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.90 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lsd value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> In vitro assay of Krosin 10 SP against of Ralstonia Solanacearum</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition zone (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibitionovercontrol = Inhibitionzonein ( treated − control ) plate diameterofthepetridish &#215; 100</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Krosin AG 10SP @ 0.5% (Streptomycin sulphate + Tetracycline hydrochloride)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.76 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control (Sterile water)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >--</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lsd value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Autostin 50 WP was found to be promising in the reduction of the growth of Fusariumoxysporum. Amini et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref34">34</xref>] observed that Carbendazim (Autostin 50 WP) was effective in controlling Fusariumoxysporum in in vitro and fieldcondition. Murakoshi and Takahashi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref35">35</xref>] and Svetlana Milijasevic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref36">36</xref>] stated that antibiotics like Streptocyclin found to be very effective in controlling Ralstoniasolanacearum, causing bacterial wilt. Krosin contains two types of active ingredient i.e. Streptomycin sulphate 9% and Tetracycline hydrochloride 1% that reduces the selection pressure and controls bacteria efficiently.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effect of Different Treatments on Wilt Complex and Yield of Eggplant</title><p>The incidence of fungal wilt with the application of different treatments singly or in combination varied sharply ranging from 0 to 13.33% against Fusariumoxysporum. Plants in control treatments showed the highest disease incidence (13.33%) while no wilt incidence was noticed in case of treatments T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>5</sub>, T<sub>6</sub>, T<sub>7</sub>, T<sub>8</sub>, T<sub>9</sub>, T<sub>12</sub>, T<sub>13</sub>, T<sub>14</sub> and T<sub>15</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In case of incidence of bacterial wilt, treatment T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>7</sub>, T<sub>8</sub>, T<sub>12</sub>, T<sub>13</sub>, T<sub>14</sub> and T<sub>15</sub> exhibited complete reduction of Ralstoniasolanacearum compared to control (33.33%). Nemic wilt incidence was also greater in control plots (13.33%) than in treatment T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>6</sub>, T<sub>9</sub> and T<sub>12 </sub>(6.67%) whereas no nemic wilt incidence was observed in case of treatment T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>7</sub>, T<sub>8</sub>, T<sub>13</sub>, T<sub>14</sub> and T<sub>15</sub>. The cumulative incidence wilt complex also had the similar trend where the maximum incidence of wilt complex was recorded in control (60%). In contrast, no wilt complex was noticed in case of treatment T<sub>15</sub> where Krosin, Furadan, Trichoderma formulation and Poultry manure were applied combinedly. The minimum yield was obtained in control treatment T<sub>16</sub> (8.02 t&#183;ha<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of different treatments on Wilt Incidence (DI) and yield of eggplant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Disease incidence (DI) (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total Incidence of wilt complex (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yield (ton hectre<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium wilt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacterial wilt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nemic wilt</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub> = Autostin 50 WP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33(3.21) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.21 d-f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub> = Furadan 3G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.02 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub> = Krosin 10SP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.62 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub> = Trichoderma sp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.86 bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub> = Poultry manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33 (3.22) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00 (3.83) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.13 f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33(3.21) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.80 d-f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.32 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.34 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>9</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33(3.21) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.91 d-f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>10</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.43 f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>11</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.18 cd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>12</sub> = T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 (1.96) bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.10 d-f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>13</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.56 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>14</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.24 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>15</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 (0.71) c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.10 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>16</sub> = Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33 (3.21) a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33 (5.71) a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33 (3.21) a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00 (7.45) a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.02 g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.61</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values in a column with same letter (s) do not differ significantly (p = 0.05). *Figures in parenthesis are the mean of square root transformed values.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Effect of Different Treatments on Plant Growth Parameters against Wilt Complex of Eggplant</title><p>The yield contributing characters of eggplants significantly influenced by the treatments applied against wilt complex. The highest shoot length (76.40 cm) was observed in T<sub>5</sub>, whereas the lowest length of the shoot was in the control plants (53.97 cm). The number of branches (17.03) as well as leaves (179.0) was maximum in T<sub>15</sub> where Trichoderma formulation, Krosin, Furadan and Poultry manure were applied combinedly. The plants treated with T<sub>15</sub> produced the maximum number of fruits (37.33) while the lowest number of fruits plant<sup>−1</sup> (23.37) was recorded in the control plots. The highest fruit length (23.00 cm) was observed in case of treatment T<sub>15</sub> followed by the treatments T<sub>13</sub>, T<sub>14</sub> and T<sub>1</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Effect of Treatments on Growth Parameters and Yield Over Control</title><p>Treatment T<sub>15</sub> (Krosin 10SP + Furadan 5G + Trichoderma formulation + Poultry manure) was found to influence the number of branches, leaves, fruits, fruit</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of different treatments on plant growth parameters against wilt complex of eggplant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of branches plant<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of leaf plant<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of fruit plant<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruit length</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub> = Autostin 50 WP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.63 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.40 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.33 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.10 c-f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.47 b-d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub> = Furadan 3G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.07 gh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.93 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.33 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.13 fg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20 c-e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub> = Krosin 10SP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.00 e-h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.87 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.67 b-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.53 e-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.80 b-e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub> = Trichoderma sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.00 c-f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.80 a-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.67 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.77 d-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00 f-h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub> = Poultry manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.40 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.10 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161.67 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.70 b-f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.13 c-f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.53 b-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.13 a-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.33 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.87 c-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.07 e-g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.80 f-h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.03 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.00 de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.47 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.53 d-g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.67 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.57 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.67 b-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.57 b-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00 f-h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>9</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.57 f-h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.13 a-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.33 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.53 b-f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.73 h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>10</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.33 c-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.70 a-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.00 c-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.47 e-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.60 gh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>11</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.07 e-h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.23 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.00 b-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.97 b-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.07 e-g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>12</sub> = T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.27 d-h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57 b-d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.67 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.50 c-g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.93 b-e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>13</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.33 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.93 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.33 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.43 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.47 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>14</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.57 b-e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.27 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.00 a-c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.07 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.93 a-c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>15</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.63 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.03 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.00 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.33 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.00 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>16</sub> = Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.97 i</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.93 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.00 f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.37 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.07 h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values in a column with same letter (s) do not differ significantly (p = 0.05).</p><p>length and fruit yield of eggplant by 32%, 29%, 60%, 53% and 300%, respectively. Poultry manure increased plant height by 42% over control where treatment T<sub>15 </sub>increased 36% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)</title><p>The benefit cost ratio (BCR) of treatment T<sub>15</sub> (Krosin + Furadan + Trichoderma formulation + Poultry manure) was the highest (5.68) followed by T<sub>14</sub> (5.56) and T<sub>4</sub> (5.48) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Integrated approach by employing three chemicals viz. Autostin 50WP (Carbendazim), Furadan 3G (Carbofuran), and Krosin 10SP (streptomycin sulphate) along with a bio-agent Trichoderma harzianum and a soil amendment by poultry manure singly and in combinations were explored for the management of wilt complex of eggplant. The treatment combinations showed a better result</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of treatments for controlling wilt complex of eggplant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield (ton) ha<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gross return (Tk ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total cost of production = Fixed cost + Treatment cost (Tk ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BCR</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub> = Autostin 50WP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404,280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97,420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub> = Furadan 3G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100,720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub> = Krosin 10SP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >392,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96,640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub> = Trichoderma sp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >517,240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94,320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub> = Poultry manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >362,660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103,320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >416,180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100,020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103,320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >546,980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99,240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>9</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >398,340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109,020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>10</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >368,620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112,320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>11</sub> = T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >463,740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>12</sub> = T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >422,120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105,920</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>13</sub> = T<sub>1</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >555,120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111,620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>14</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >602,100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>15</sub> = T<sub>2</sub> + T<sub>3</sub> + T<sub>4</sub> + T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119,840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>16</sub> = Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160,520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91,720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*1 United States dollar = 84.83 Bangladeshi taka (Tk). *Costing was done on the basis of market price’ 2018.</p><p>than the individual application of each of the management option except Trichoderma formulation. The combination of bactericide (Krosin 10 SP), nematicide (Furadan 3G), Trichoderma formulation and poultry manure showed promising performances satisfying the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR). Trichoderma formulation and Poultry manure not only suppress the soil-borne pathogens but also improved soil properties which resulted in higher yield.</p><p>It is worth mentioning here that the combination of treatments without Autostin 50 WP also showed superior results in reducing the fungal wilt incidence. The possible reason might be the Trichoderma formulation which acted against Fusariumoxysporum, consequently controlled the fungal incidence and some cases can cause 95% recovery of infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref37">37</xref>]. It is assumed that nematicide controlled not only nematode but also bacteria. The farmers of Philippine noticed no wilt symptom even in infectected sucker of banana caused by Ralstoniasolanacearum after treating with Furadan<sup>&#174; </sup>(a.i. carbofuran 48%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref38">38</xref>]. For this mechanism, Furadan 3G was enabled to combat the bacteria, even in absence of bactericide in the treatment. As the nemic infection facilitates the penetration of bacteria through wounds, Furadan indirectly control the bacteria by managing nematode. Combined application of Carbofuran 3G, Neem cake, Streptocyclin and Trichodermaharazianum was effective in controlling Meloidogyneincognita and Ralstoniasolanacearum causing wilt complex of eggplant under field condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref39">39</xref>]. The integration of Streptocylin @0.5 g/L + COC 50% WP (1 g/L) intercropped with Mustard cake was successful in reducing bacterial wilt incidence by 23.35% and formation of knots by 72.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref40">40</xref>].</p><p>Trichoderma spp. enhance plant growth and productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref42">42</xref>]. The mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. were antagonism, mycoparasitism, competition with pathogens for nutrient and space and induction of systemic resistance in plants resulting in the reduction of disease and increase in yield. Carbofuran also showed a prominent influence on the growth parameters and suppression of Meloidogyne spp. and Ralstoniasolanacearum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref43">43</xref>]. The addition of poultry manure in the treatments ensued the increased yield by boosting up the soil fertility and the suppressing nature of the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110959-ref44">44</xref>]. Krosin was responsible for inducing resistance in plants against Ralstoniasolanacearum. Thus the integrated use of Krosin, Furadan, Trichoderma formulation, and Poultry manure showed the maximum performances in yield and yield contributing characters. Though treatment T<sub>13</sub> comprised ofTrichoderma formulation and Poultry manure, it gave a lower yield than T<sub>14</sub>. It might be due to the presence of component Autostin 50 WP which has antifungal properties on Trichoderma formulation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In the current study, the morphological and cultural characteristics of F. oxysporum, R. solanacearum and Meloidogyne sp. have been described to provide key information for identification. The pathogenicity test confirmed the virulent nature of these pathogens which caused wilt of eggplant plants. Further, in vitro assay suggests that carbendazim can control F. oxysporum while streptomycin sulphate with tetracycline hydrochloride act against R. solanacearum effectively even at low concentrations.</p><p>From the field experiment, it can be concluded that integration of Streptomycin Sulphate with Tetracycline Hydrochloride (Krosin 10SP), Carbofuran (Furadan 3G), Poultry manure and Trichodermaharzianum formulation may be an alternative approach to control wilt complex of eggplant with higher economic return and lower impact on the environment. The feasibility of using this treatment in controlling wilt complex of eggplant needs to be tested both in other solanaceous vegetables irrespective of Agro-Ecological Zone (AEZ) of the country.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology (NST) Fellowship, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of Bangladesh.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Data availability Statement</title><p>The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “Digital Archive on Agricultural Theses and Journal” at http://www.saulibrary.edu.bd/daatj/public/index.php/thesis/thesis_individual/6596, reference number 11-04480_11.pdf.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Akter, N., Islam, M.R., Hossain, M.B., Islam, M.N., Chowdhury, S.R., Hoque, S., Nitol, R.H. and Tasnin, R. (2021) Management of Wilt Complex of Eggplant (Solanummelongena L.) Caused by Fusariumoxysporum, Ralstonia solanacearum and Meloidogyne spp. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 1155-1171. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.127080</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.110959-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BBS (2018) Year Book of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh. Statistics Division, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (Monthly Statistical Bulletin, Bangladesh, December, 2018), Ministry of Planning, Government of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 65-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, G.P., Ramaswamy, S. and Bari, M.A. (2000) Integrated Crop Management Practices for the Control of the Eggplant Shoot and Fruit Borer in Bangladesh. DAE-DA NIDA Strengthening Plant Protection Services (SPPS) Project. Department of Agricultural Extension, Dhaka, l2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, M.M. (2000) A Guidebook of Plant Pathology. Department of Plant Pathology, HSTU, Dinajpur, 58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, M., Alam, M.Z. and Akanda, M.A.M. (1994) Grafting: A Technique of Control Soil Borne Diseases of Tomato and Eggplant. Institute of Post Graduate Studies in Agriculture (IPSA), Gazipur, IPSA-JICA Publication No. 4, 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vanitha, S.C., Niranjana, S.R., Mortensen, C.N. and Umesha, S. (2009) Bacterial Wilt of Tomato in Karnataka and Its Management by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biocontrol, 54, 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-009-9217-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishat, S., Hamim, I., Khalil, M.I., Ali, M.A., Hossain, M.A., Meah, M.B. and Islam, M.R. (2015) Genetic Diversity of the Bacterial Wilt Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum Using a RAPD Marker. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 338, 757-767.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.06.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Begum, H.A. (2007) Studies on the Integrated Management for Tomato Wilt Complex. PhD Thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meah, M.B. (1997) Diseases in Rabi Crops under Crop Diversification Program. Department of Agricultural Extension, Dhaka, Report Crop Diversification Program, 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bari, M.A. (2001) Biological Control of Soil Borne Diseases of Vegetables. Contract Research Project, Plant Pathology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydevpur, 21-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ka skavalci</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Effect of Soil Solarization and Organic Amendment Treatments for Controlling Meloidogyne incognita in Tomato Cultivars in Western Anatolia</article-title><source> Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry</source><volume> 31</volume>,<fpage> 159</fpage>-<lpage>167</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elphinstone, J.G. and Aley, P. (1993) Integrated Control of Bacterial Wilt of Potato in the Warm Tropics of Peru. Bacterial Wilt Proceedings of an International Conference, Kaohsiung, 28-31 October 1992, 276-283.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kucharek, T. (1998) Bacterial Wilt of Row Crops in Florida. Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pradhanang, P.M., Momol, M.T., Olson, S.M. and Jones, J.B. (2003) Effects of Plant Essential Oils on Ralstonia solanacearum Population Density and Bacterial Wilt Incidence in Tomato. Plant Disease, 87, 423-427.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.4.423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chowdhury, M.A.Z, Fakhruddin, A.N.M., Islam, M.N., Moniruzzaman, M., Gan, S.H. and Alam, M.K. (2013) Detection of the Residues of Nineteen Pesticides in Fresh Vegetable Samples Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Food Control, 34, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.05.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, Z. (2016) Lack of Regulations Affect Vegetable Export. The Financial Express. http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.Com/2016/03/26/23070/asia/print</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kulkarni, S. (2015) Commercialization of Microbial Bio Pesticides for the Management of Pests and Diseases. In: Awasthii, L.P., Ed., Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Plant Diseases, Springer, Berlin, 8.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2571-3_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hermosa, R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I. and Monte, E. (2012) Plant-Beneficial Effects of Trichoderma and of Its Gene. Microbiology, 158, 17-25.  
https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.052274-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howell, C.R. (2006) Understanding the Mechanism Employed by Trichoderma virens to Effect Biological Control of Cotton Diseases. Phytopathology, 96, 178-180.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramaiah, A.K. and Garampalli, R.K.H. (2015) In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Some Plant Extracts against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 5, 22-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarkar, S. and Chaudhuri, S. (2016) Bacterial Wilt and Its Management. Current Science, 110, 1439-1445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janvier, C., Villeneuve, E., Alabouvette, C., Edel-Hermann, V., Mateille, T. and Steinberg, C. (2007) Soil Health through Soil Disease Suppression: Which Strategy from Descriptors to Indicators? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 1-23.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Islam, T.M.D. and Toyota, K. (2004) Suppression of Bacterial Wilt of Tomato by Ralstonia solanacearum by Incorporation of Composts in Soil and Possible Mechanism. Microbes and Environment, 19, 53-60.  
https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.2004.53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vyas, R.V., Patel, B.A., Patel, B.N. and Patel, J.G. (2009) Integrated Management of Root-Knot Nematode in Eggplant under Field Conditions. Indian Journal of Nematology, 39, 35-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kelman</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1954</year>)<article-title>The Relationship of Pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to Colony Appearance on a Tetrazolium Medium</article-title><source> Phytopathology</source><volume> 44</volume>,<fpage> 693</fpage>-<lpage>695</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gram</surname><given-names> H.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1884</year>)<article-title>über die isolierte Farbung der Schizomyceten in Schnittund Trocken praparaten</article-title><source> Fortschritte der Medizin</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 185</fpage>-<lpage>189</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Islam, M.M., Islam, M.R., Stevens, C., Meah, M.B. and Miah, M.A.T. (2005) Molecular Characterization of Phomopsis vexan in the Core Eggplant Producing Areas of Bangladesh. Sixteen Biennial Conference of Bangladesh Phytopathological Society, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 9 February 2016, 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vincent, J.M. (1947) Distortion of Fungal Hyphae in Presence of Certain Inhibition. Nature, 159, 850. https://doi.org/10.1038/159850b0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Islam, M.A., Sharfuddin, A.F.M. and Islam, N. (2004d) A Study of Production Technology and Disease Management of Ginger and Turmeric in Selected Areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Crop Science, 13, 103-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, P.E., Toussoun, T.A. and Marasas, W.F.O. (1983) Fusarium Species: An Illustrated Manual for Identification. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joshi, M., Srivastava, R., Sharma, A.K. and Prakash, A. (2013) Isolation and Characterization of Fusarium oxysporum, a Wilt Causing Fungus, for Its Pathogenic and Non-Pathogenic Nature in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 5, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v5i1.290</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, A. and Sarma, Y.R. (2004) Characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum Causing Bacterial Wilt in Ginger. Indian Phytopathology, 57, 12-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhital, S.P., Thaveechai, N. and Shrestha, S.K. (2000/2001) Characteristics of Ralstonia Solanacearum Strains of Potato Wilt Disease from Nepal and Thailand. Nepal Agriculture Research Journal, 4-5, 2000-2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sitaramaiah, K. and Singh, R.S. (1976) Control of Root-Knot of Vegetable Crops. In: Annual Report of Research 1974-75, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &amp; Technology, Pantagar, 113-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jahanshir, A. and Fevzi, S.D. (2010) The Effects of Fungicides on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Associated with Fusarium Wilt of Tomato. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 50, 172. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-010-0029-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murakoshi, S. and Takahashi, M. (1984) Trials of Some Control of Tomato wilt Caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Bulletin of the Kanagawa Horticultural Experiment Station, 31, 50-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milijasevic, S., Todorovic, B., Potocnik, I., Rekanovic, E. and Stepanovic, M. (2009) Effects of Copper-Based Compounds, Antibiotics and a Plant Activator on Population Sizes and Spread of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in Greenhouse Tomato Seedling. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 24, 19-27.  
https://doi.org/10.2298/PIF0901019M</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adhikary, M.C., Begum, H.A. and Miah, M.B. (2017) Possibility of Recovery of Fusarium Wilt Affected Eggplants by Trichoderma. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology, 7, 38-42.  
https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v7i1.33319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pava, H.M., Franje, N.F. and Timario, T.J. (2003) Banana Pilot Demonstration Studies for Bukidnon: Table Salt and Early Debudding to Control “Bugtok” Disease of Cooking Banana Cultivars “Saba” and “Cardaba”. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 28, 31-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zakir, H. and Bora, B.C. (2008) Integrated Management of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum Complex in Eggplant. Indian Journal of Nematology, 38, 58-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavithra, S. and Khatib, R. (2014) Integrated Management of Wilt Complex Involving Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). The Bioscan, 9, 291-294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E. (2000) Myths and Dogmas of Biocontrol Changes in Perceptions Derived on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Disease, 84, 377-393.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shoresh, M., Harman, G.E. and Mastouri, F. (2010) Induced Systemic Resistance and Plant Responses to Fungal Biocontrol Agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114450</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names> M.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Elgawad</surname><given-names> A.B.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Sanaa and Kabeil</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Management of the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato in Egypt</article-title><source> Journal of American Science</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 256</fpage>-<lpage>262</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110959-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stirling, G.R. (1989) Organic Amendments for Control of Root-Knot Nematode on Ginger. Australasian Plant Pathology, 18, 39-44.  
https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9890039</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>