<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2021.127046</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-110365</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparative Analysis of the Genomes of Three Field Isolates of the Rice Blast Fungus &lt;i&gt;Magnaporthe oryzae&lt;/i&gt; from Southern China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kailing</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jinqi</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Su</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jianyuan</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Congying</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aiqing</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bing</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaoyuan</surname><given-names>Zhu#</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wenjuan</surname><given-names>Wang#</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection, Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>713</fpage><lpage>725</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Rice blast caused by 
  <em>Magnaporthe oryzae</em> (
  <em>M. oryzae</em>) is one of the most destructive diseases, which causes significant rice yield losses and affects global food security. To better understand genetic variations among different isolates of 
  <em>M. oryzae</em> in the nature field, we re-sequenced and analyzed the genomes of three field isolates, QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, which showed distinct pathogenicity on Xin-Yin-Zhan, an elite variety in South China. Genome annotation indicated that these three isolates assemblies have similar genome sizes with 38.4 Mb, 38.3 Mb, and 38.4 Mb, respectively. The QJ08-2006 assembly has 2082 contigs with an N50 of 127.4 kb, the QJ10-10 assembly has 2239 contigs with an N50 of 105.13 kb, the QJ10-3001 assembly has 2025 contigs with an N50 of 133.16 kb. A total of 10,432 genes including 1408 putative secreted protein genes were identified from the annotated isolate QJ08-2006 genome, 10,418 genes including 1410 putative secreted protein genes were identified in QJ10-10, and 10,401 genes including 1420 putative secreted protein genes were identified in QJ10-3001. There are as many as 11,076 identical genes in these three isolates and contained only a few unique genes among three isolates, of which 277 unique genes in QJ08-2006 and 264 unique genes in QJ10-10, and 213 unique genes in QJ10-3001. Most of the predicted secreted protein genes had been identified, and the three re-sequenced strains contained 371, 369, and 387 small Indel, respectively. 
  <em>Avr </em>genes were analyzed in several sequenced 
  <em>Magnaporthe</em> strains, the results revealed that 
  <em>Avr-Pi9</em> and 
  <em>Avr-Piz-t </em>were present in all the sequenced isolates. The isolates QJ08-2006 contained 
  <em>AvrPib</em>, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 had an insertion of a Pot3 element in the promoter of the 
  <em>AvrPib</em> gene. Our results showed that, the rapid dominancy of virulence mutant isolates via clonal propagation displayed in the field after the release of the elite variety Xin-Yin-Zhan.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Rice Blast</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Magnaporthe oryzae&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Comparative Genomics</kwd><kwd> Genetic Variation</kwd><kwd> Secreted Protein Genes</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rice (Oryza sativa) is one of the major staple food crops for more than half of the human population worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref1">1</xref>]. However, a large portion of yield is lost due to agricultural disease and pests annually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref2">2</xref>]. Rice blast, caused by the filamentous ascomycete fungusMagnaporthe oryzae (syn. Pyricularia oryzae), occurs in every rice-growing regions in worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref4">4</xref>], and poses a major threat to global food security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref6">6</xref>]. This pathogen can infect leaves, stems, panicles, nodes, and even roots of rice at the whole stage of development and also infects wheat and other small grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref9">9</xref>]. As genomes of M. oryzae have been sequenced and the data of the genomes is available to the public [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref10">10</xref>], rice and M. oryzae have been developed as the classical model system for studying the plant-microbe interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>In many parts of the world, deployment of disease-resistance varieties is an economical and efficient strategy for the management of rice blast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref2">2</xref>]. However, M. oryzae often can overcome rice resistance based on race-specific resistant genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref12">12</xref>]. New resistant varieties often lose their resistance within a few years after release to the fields. High genetic variations occur within the field M. oryzae populations, especially in the pathogenic traits i.e., secreted pathogen avirulence or effectors evolve rapidly to counteract plant defense, maybe a major challenge to control rice blast disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>The advent of whole-genome sequencing technology and the subsequent deployment of the next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, genome re-sequencing, comparative studies, and the deployment of PacBio sequencing technology, has been reported in M. oryzae in the last decade [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref15">15</xref>]. More than 200 isolates of M. oryzae have been successfully generated genome assemblies using high throughput genome sequencing technologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref15">15</xref>]. The genome of the laboratory M. oryzae strain 70 - 15 was the first to be sequenced among plant-pathogenic fungi using the Sanger sequencing method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref10">10</xref>]. Subsequently, multiple M. oryzae field isolates have been sequenced using NGS technology. Such as, field isolates from Japan (P131 and Ina168) and China (Y34) were sequenced using 454 sequencing technology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref17">17</xref>]. More recently field isolates FJ81278, HN19311, and 98-06 from China, isolates B157, MG01, and RML-29 from India, and isolates R88-002, Ro1-1, and V86010 from the Philippines, and 100 isolates ofM. oryzae (P. oryzae) from China as well as several different regions around the world have been sequenced using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref22">22</xref>]. To generate near-complete genome assembly for M. oryzae field isolates and evaluated the possible contribution of TEs to genomic variation events and virulence-associated secreted proteins polymorphism, field isolates FJ81278 and Guy11 have been sequenced by PacBio sequencing technology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref14">14</xref>]. The comparison genomics analysis reported some isolate-specific genomic regions, genes under diversifying selection, hundreds of unique genes, and the specific events in the evolution of field populations of M. oryzae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref17">17</xref>]. These reports suggest the NGS technology is a powerful tool to elucidate the molecular basis of virulence, study pathogen genome variation, and provide a new method for cloning novel avirulence genes.</p><p>Genome-wide studies of more blast field isolates and identification of novel Avr effectors will help researchers to further disclose the mechanism of pathogen and plant co-evolution. QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 were three field M. oryzae isolates in South China, which showed different pathogenicity on a released resistant variety Xin-Yin-Zhan. In this study, we investigated the genomic variations and DNA polymorphisms of three M. oryzae field isolate by NGS technology in an attempt to understand the genomic variation within field isolates after release of the resistant variety. This work will be useful for breeders and pathologists to understand the variation of M. oryzae virulences and develop strategies to improve the resistance of varieties against rice blast.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. M. oryzae Field Isolates Used</title><p>The field M. oryzae isolates QJ08-2006 was collected from cv. Ma-Ba-Yin-Zhan (MBYZ), the isolates QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 were collected from cv. Xin-Yin-Zhan (XYZ). The newly improved blast-resistant rice variety of XYZ was developed using the susceptible elite variety, MBYZ, as the recurrent line. All these three isolates were collected from the panicle neck of rice plant samples at Guangdong Province, China in the year 2008 and 2010, respectively, and have been kept at Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GDAAS, China).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction and Genome Sequencing</title><p>Isolates of M. oryzae were cultured in liquid complete medium (CM: 6 g yeast extract, 6 g casein hydrolysate, and 10 g sucrose in 1 L of medium) to prepare the vegetative mycelia for the extraction of genomic DNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref23">23</xref>]. Vegetative mycelia were harvested and ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. The genomic DNA of each M. oryzae isolate was extracted following a protocol described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref24">24</xref>]. The whole-genome sequencing libraries of the three selected isolates, QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, were prepared using the Illumina paired-end DNA sample Prep Kit and sequenced by Illumina Hiseq2000 sequencing technology at BGI Tech (Shenzhen, China). Approximately 2 Gb clean reads from the library averaging 500 bp in size were obtained for these three sequenced isolates.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Genome Assembling</title><p>Short reads generated were mapped to the M. oryzae reference genome 70 - 15 (version 8, Magnaporthe Comparative Sequencing Project, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT). De-novo genome sequence assembly was conducted with CLC Genomic Workbench 7.0 software.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Gene Prediction and Annotation</title><p>The genomic sequences of three re-sequenced isolates were filtered by using Repeatmask 3.3 (http://www.repeatmasker.org, species = “magnaporthe_grisea”), and repeat sequences used were from RepBase (http://www.girinst.org/). Gene predictions were conducted through the Fgenesh model of Molquest (species, magnaporthe; sequence length, more than 20 aa) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref21">21</xref>]. Masked genome sequences of QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 were compared using the MUMMER package to construct the chromosome sequence for each isolates, respectively based on the reference 70 - 15 genomic sequence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref25">25</xref>]. Protein domain was predicted using SMART database. We used SignalP4.0, Protcomp-AN, and TMHMM2.0 package to predict secreted protein genes of M. oryzae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref27">27</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Genome Sequencing and Assembly of the Genomes of QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001</title><p>Genomic DNA of isolates QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 were prepared as paired-end libraries and sequenced by using the Illumina HiSeq2000 system at BGI Tech (Shenzhen, China). In total, 1860 Mb, 1810 Mb, and 1810 Mb of clean data for QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 were generated, respectively, which derived from paired-end sequence libraries with an average fragment length of 500 bp in size (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The genomes of these three isolates were de-novo assembled using CLC Bio genomic workbench software and annotated using a standard procedure as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref28">28</xref>]. As showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, these three assemblies resulted in similar genome size of 38.4 Mb, 38.3 Mb, and 38.4 Mb, respectively. The QJ08-2006 assembly had 2082 contigs with an N50 of 127.4 kb, the QJ10-10 assembly had 2239 contigs with an N50 of 105.13 kb, the QJ10-3001 assembly had 2025 contigs with an N50 of 133.16 kb. However, the genomic features of these three isolates described herein showed much more distinct in most features from other isolates reported previously, including 98-06, P131, Y34, FJ81278, HN19311, R88-002, and 70-15 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Genome assembly and annotation statistics from ten M. oryzae isolates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sequencing platform</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >98-06</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P131</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Y34</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FJ81278</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HN19311</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R88-002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >70-15</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sanger + 454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sanger + 454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PacBio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illumina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sanger</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Assembly genome size (Mb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coverage (fold)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contig Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2239</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average contig length (kb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >811.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N50 contig length (kb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G+C content (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Repeat sequence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.43%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of predicted genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,401</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,869</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,927</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,440</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average gene length (bp)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1334</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of secreted protein genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1408</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1732</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1005</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Genome Annotation and Gene Prediction</title><p>A total of 10,432 genes (≥20 aa) including 1408 putative secreted protein genes were identified from the annotated isolate QJ08-2006 genome, a total of 10,418 genes (≥20 aa) including 1410 putative secreted protein genes were identified from the annotated isolate QJ10-10 genome, and a total of 10,401 genes (≥20 aa) including 1420 putative secreted protein genes were identified from the annotated isolate QJ10-3001 genome (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The average length of predicted genes was ~1530 bp. Intriguingly, these 3 isolates showed quite similar features, e.g., genome size, number of predicted genes, and secreted protein genes. By contrast, they were distinct from other sequenced isolates in most features (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Identification of Presence/Absence Variation in Different Isolates</title><p>To identify the unique genes in the three field isolates, the genomic content was compared to each other. To avoid false-positive gene predictions, the genes from each of the three gene sets (QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001) were aligned to genome sequences of the other two isolates using FASTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref29">29</xref>]. As showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, there were as many as 11076 identical genes in these three isolates and contained only a few unique genes among each isolates. There were 277 unique genes in QJ08-2006 and 264 unique genes in QJ10-10, and 213 unique genes in QJ10-3001 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). To gain a functional annotation of the unique genes in isolates QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, the gene sets were annotated by predicting secreted proteins. A small number of the secreted proteins were identified from the unique gene set: 16 (5.78%) in QJ08-2006, 31 (11.74%) in QJ10-10,</p><p>and 19 (8.92%) in QJ10-3001, showing that there are few of the secreted proteins in a unique gene set.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Analysis of Avirulence Genes in Some Sequenced Magnaporthe</title><p>We had compared Avr genes in some sequenced M. oryzae strains including 70-15, QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The avirulence gene, Avr-CO39 was absent in all of the analyzed strains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Avr-Pi9 and Avr-Piz-t were present in all sequenced strains. Avr-Pii was absent in all of the analyzed strains except the strain P131 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Compared with QJ10-10, QJ10-3001, the strain QJ08-2006 has a unique secreted protein gene, AvrPib, while the isolates QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 had an insertion of a Pot3 element in the promoter of the AvrPib gene, which has led to a gain in virulence towards rice varieties carrying the R gene, Pib. We validated in silico analyzed host specificity factors and Avr genes by PCR amplification using gene specific primers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref30">30</xref>]. This validation confirmed the accuracy of prediction of the presence and absence of the aforementioned Avr genes in QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 (data not show).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Comparative Genome Analysis Based on Coding Genes between Three Re-Sequenced Isolates</title><p>To confirm the relationship between QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, we compared the sequence of the predicted gene and secreted protein genes between three re-sequenced isolates with gene-genome model and Blastn alignment (-max_target_seqs 2-outfit 7, the rest are default), five kinds of variations had been identified, of which were identical (Identity), SNP, small Indel (Sindel),</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Presence/absence variation of cloned avirulence (Avr) genes among sequenced strains of M. oryzae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avirulence (Avr) genes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >M. oryzaestrains</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70-15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guy11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FJ87278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98-06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GD-05-029b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pik</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr1-CO39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pi9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pib</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Pita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avr-Piz-t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: P indicates presence, A indicates absence, Partial indicates partial of avirulence gene can be detected, mostly interrupted by TE insertion in promoter region.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparative analysis of genes and secreted protein genes between three re-sequenced isolates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of comparative<sup>1)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Identity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SNP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sindel</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lindel</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unmapped</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006 VS QJ10-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006 VS QJ10-3001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10 VS QJ08-2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7518</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10 VS QJ10-3001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001 VS QJ08-2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001 VS QJ10-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4334</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secreted protein genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006 VS QJ10-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ08-2006 VS QJ10-3001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10 VS QJ08-2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-10 VS QJ10-3001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001 VS QJ08-2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QJ10-3001 VS QJ10-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >378</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1)</sup>Sindel: Small Indel, the sequence length difference is less than 60 bp, Lindel: Large Indel, the sequence length difference is more than 60 bp.</p><p>Large Indel (Lindel), and not present (Unmapped). As showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, about 7500 predicted genes were identified between QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, these three isolates contained 4362, 4351, and 4326 small Indel, respectively. And there were existed several SNP, large Indel, and unmapped sequences between these three isolates. Most of the predicted secreted protein genes were identified, and the re-sequenced isolates contained 371, 369, and 387 small Indel, respectively. The above results indicated that the relationship between QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 was very closest.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In several eukaryotic organisms, comparative analysis of multiple genomes of the same species has been used to improve assembly and annotation and to identify genome variations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref33">33</xref>]. The rice blast fungus is well-known for its natural genetic variation in the field, resulting in the emergence of new epidemics threatening to world food production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref7">7</xref>]. Genomic comparative analyses of multiple genomics in the same pathogens not only could improve the steady of the genome assembly and annotation, and the identification of variations in the plant pathogens’ genome, but also open a door to explore new virulence mechanism of the pathogen for effective plant disease control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref20">20</xref>]. In this study, we sequenced three field isolates of M. oryzae from Southern China. These three field isolates were sampled from the varieties Ma-Ba-Yin-Zhan or Xin-Yin-Zhan, which have been cultivated in the rice area of northern Guangdong for a long time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref30">30</xref>]. Genome analysis indicated that these re-sequenced field isolates were much more closely related to each other, the overall genome content and composition were similar among these three isolates, indicated that the rice blast fungus maintained a stable genomic mutation under the pressure of resistant varieties selection.</p><p>By the pathotype assays, we found QJ08-2006 was avirulent to the rice variety Xin-Yin-Zhan, while both the strain QJ10-10 and QJ10-3001 were impressively virulent to Xin-Yin-Zhan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref30">30</xref>]. Comparative genomics found that the sequenced strains have their unique sequences, suggesting some pathogenic-related sequences may exist outside core genome regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref19">19</xref>]. The whole-genome re-sequenced results showed that these three strains showed quite similar features, e.g., genome size, number of predicted genes, and secreted protein genes, showed that they have a closer relationship with each other. And there were as many as 11,076 identical genes in these three isolates and contained only a few unique genes in each isolate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Among them, a small number of the secreted proteins were identified from the unique gene set: 16 (5.78%) in QJ08-2006, 31 (11.74%) in QJ10-10, and 19 (8.92%) in QJ10-3001, showing few of the secreted proteins present in the unique gene set. These data suggested that little genetic differences exist between the field isolates QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001.</p><p>Yoshida et al. (2009) observed that the presence or absence of effector gene polymorphisms were often associated with unstable genomic regions near the chromosome ends. It was therefore hypothesized that isolate-specific regions located at the chromosomal ends supplied new effectors and pathogenicity-related factors to drive genome evolution. The dynamic adaptation of M. oryzae may be primarily achieved by the deletion or recovery of Avr genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref34">34</xref>]. Such hypotheses indicate that further genome sequencing of multiple M. oryzae isolates is warranted for characterizing rice pathogenic strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref16">16</xref>]. Most of the cloned Avr genes of M. oryzae reflected the important role of transposable elements (TEs) in variations in pathogenicity and the loss of function of Avr genes in M. oryzae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref35">35</xref>]. In our study, the effector AvrPib also showed polymorphisms in these three re-sequenced isolates. The isolates QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001 had an insertion of a Pot3 element in the promoter of theAvrPib gene, which has led to a gain in virulence towards rice varieties carrying the R gene, Pib [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref30">30</xref>]. The Pot3 element inserted in the AvrPib promoter of QJ10-10 and QJ10-3001 suggested this gene is undergoing positive selection, which probably enables these isolates to overcome the resistant rice varieties that harbor AvrPib alleles recently. The loss of function of AvrPib was also identified in 300 isolates collected in five different rice-growing areas in China, and a Pot3 insertion in various positions of −260 bp, −236 bp, −128 bp, −52 bp, −22 bp, and +170 bp, leading to the loss of avirulence function of AvrPib in the five populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref36">36</xref>]. In the 248 virulent isolates collected from a disease hotspot in Philippine, Pot3 was present at the AvrPib region of −304 bp, −125 bp, and +169 bp in each of avrPib-H1, −H2, and −H3 isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref37">37</xref>]. Similarly, some researchers reported that the diversification in the genome location of Avr-Pita was the consequence of recognition by Pita in rice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref38">38</xref>].</p><p>To date, only 12Avr genes have been cloned in M. oryzae. By contrast, more than 28 R genes in rice controlling race- and not race-specific resistance to M. oryzae have been cloned [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref40">40</xref>]. In the traditional “gene-for-gene” model, resistance (R) genes in the host specifically recognize corresponding avirulence (Avr) genes of the pathogens. Recognition is followed by triggering a hypersensitive response (HR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref41">41</xref>]. Thus, there were a lot of potentials to identify and cloneAvr genes in M. oryzae. Before 2009, only the PWL family of three members PWL1, PWL3and PWL4 were cloned by homology to PWL2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref42">42</xref>], other virulence genes mainly were cloned by map-based cloning, such as PWL2, Avr-Pita, ACE1, Avr1-CO39, Avr-Pizt, Avr-Pia, Avr-Pii, AvrPib [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110365-ref44">44</xref>]. With the rapid development of biotechnology and high-throughput sequencing technology, Avr-Piks/Km/Kp, Avr-Pi9and Avr-Pi54 were cloned by using the method of comparative genomics. Due to the instability of the rice blast fungus genome, and that Avr proteins lack conserved domains, the map-based cloning, homology cloning and other traditional cloning strategies were not be effectively utilized. Therefore, whole-genome sequencing of more field blast isolates could accelerate cloning more Avr genes and obtain more information about effector proteins.</p><p>Overall, this study provided a systematic genomic analysis of the rice blast field isolates QJ08-2006, QJ10-10, and QJ10-3001, collected from the same field in different years in southern China. Based on the analysis of the three isolates genome, gain, loss and changes of isolate-specific sequences will lead to variances of pathogen virulence. We found that under resistant rice selection pressure for a long time, the genome of avirulent isolate and virulent isolate was very similar, while the changes tend to take place in the genetic variation of avirulence genes corresponding to their resistance genes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515011213) and the National key R &amp; D project (2016YFD0300707), Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (CARS-01-32; 2020KJ105), Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project (2019B020217003), and Project of Guangzhou Science Plan (202002030001).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chen, K.L., Feng, J.Q., Chen, S., Su, J., Yang, J.Y., Wang, C.Y., Feng, A.Q., Chen, B., Zhu, X.Y. and Wang, W.J. (2021) Comparative Analysis of the Genomes of Three Field Isolates of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae from Southern China. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 713-725. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2021.127046</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.110365-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jantasuriyarat, C., Gowda, M., Haller, K., Hatfield, J., Lu, G., Lu, G.D., Stahlberg, E., Zhou, B., Li, H.M., Kim, H., Yu, Y., Dean, R.A., Wing, R.A., Soderlund, C. and Wang, G.L. (2005) Large-Scale Identification of Expressed Sequence Tags Involved in Rice and Rice Blast Fungus Interaction. Plant Physiology, 138, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.055624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valent, B. and Chumley, F.G. (1991) Molecular Genetic Analysis of the Rice Blast Fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 29, 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.002303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Couch, B.C. and Kohn, L.M. (2002) A Multilocus Gene Genealogy Concordant with Host Preference Indicates Segregation of a New Species, Magnaporthe oryzae, from M. grisea. Mycologia, 94, 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2003.11833196</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H., Zheng, X. and Zhang, Z. (2016) The Magnaporthe grisea Species Complex and Plant Pathogenesis. Molecuar Plant Pathology, 17, 796-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12342</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebbole, D.J. (2007) Magnaporthe as a Model for Understanding Host-Pathogen Interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 45, 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S.J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N. and Nelson, A. (2019) The Global Burden of Pathogens and Pests on Major Food Crops. Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution, 3, 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talbot, N.J. (2003) On the Trail of a Cereal Killer: Exploring the Biology of Magnaporthe grisea. Annual Review of Microbiology, 57, 177-202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090957</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sesma, A. and Osbourn, A.E. (2004) The Rice Leaf Blast Pathogen Undergoes Developmental Processes Typical of Root-Infecting Fungi. Nature, 431, 582-586. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02880</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, R.A. and Talbot, N.J. (2009) Fungal Physiology—A Future Perspective. Microbiology, 155, 3810-3815. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.035436-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dean, R.A., Talbot, N.J., Ebbole, D.J., Farman, M.L., Mitchell, T.K., Orbach, M.J., Thon, M., Kulkarni, R., Xu, J.R., Pan, H., Read, N.D., Lee, Y.H., Carbone, I., Brown, D., Oh, Y.Y., Donofrio, N., Jeong, J.S., Soanes, D.M., Djonovic, S., Kolomiets, E., et al. (2005) The Genome Sequence of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature, 434, 980-986. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03449</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, S., Park, J., Park, S.Y., Mitchell, T.K. and Lee, Y.H. (2010) Identification and Analysis of in Planta Expressed Genes of Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Genomics, 11, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orbach, M.J., Farrall, L., Sweigard, J.A., Chumley, F.G. and Valent, B. (2000) A Telomeric Avirulence Gene Determines Efficacy for the Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pita. Plant Cell, 12, 2019-2032. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.11.2019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, J., Nelson, R.J. and Zeigler, R.S. (1999) Population Structure and Dynamics of Magnaporthe grisea in the Indian Himalayas. Genetics, 152, 971-984. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/152.3.971</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bao, J., Chen, M., Zhong, Z., Tang, W., Lin, L., Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Zhang, D., Miao, C., Tang, H., Zhang, J., Lu, G., Ming, R., Norvienyeku, J., Wang, B. and Wang, Z. (2017) PacBio Sequencing Reveals Transposable Elements as a Key Contributor to Genomic Plasticity and Virulence Variation in Magnaporthe oryzae. Molecular Plant, 10, 1465-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhong, Z., Chen, M., Lin, L., Han, Y., Bao, J., Tang, W., Lin, L., Lin, Y., Somai, R., Lu, L., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Hong, Y., Chen, X., Wang, B., Shen, W.C., Lu, G., Norvienyeku, J., Ebbole, D.J. and Wang, Z. (2018) Population Genomic Analysis of the Rice Blast Fungus Reveals Specific Events Associated with Expansion of Three Main Clades. ISME Journal, 12, 1867-1878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0100-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoshida, K., Saitoh, H., Fujisawa, S., Kanzaki, H., Matsumura, H., Yoshida, K., Tosa, Y., Chuma, I., Takano, Y., Win, J., Kamoun, S. and Terauchi, R. (2009) Association Genetics Reveals Three Novel Avirulence Genes from the Rice Blast Fungal Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell, 21, 1573-1591. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.066324</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xue, M., Yang, J., Li, Z., Hu, S., Yao, N., Dean, R.A., Zhao, W., Shen, M., Zhang, H., Li, C., Liu, L., Cao, L., Xu, X., Xing, Y., Hsiang, T., Zhang, Z., Xu, J.R. and Peng, Y.L. (2012) Comparative Analysis of the Genomes of Two Field Isolates of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Genetics, 8, e1002869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002869</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, L.J., van der Does, H.C., Borkovich, K.A., Coleman, J.J., Daboussi, M.J., Di, Pietro, A., Dufresne, M., Freitag, M., Grabherr, M., Henrissat, B., Houterman, P.M., Kang, S., et al. (2010) Comparative Genomics Reveals Mobile Pathogenicity Chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature, 464, 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, C., Lian, B., Hu, J., Zhai, H., Wang, X., Venu, R.C., Liu, E., Wang, Z., Chen, M., Wang, B., Wang, G.L., Wang, Z. and Mitchell, T.K. (2013) Genome Comparison of Two Magnaporthe oryzae Field Isolates Reveals Genome Variations and Potential Virulence Effectors. BMC Genomics, 14, 887. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-887</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dong, Y., Li, Y., Zhao, M., Jing, M., Liu, X., Liu, M., Guo, X., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Ye, W., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Wang, P. and Zhang, Z. (2015) Global Genome and Transcriptome Analyses of Magnaporthe oryzae Epidemic Isolate 98-06 Uncover Novel Effectors and Pathogenicity-Related Genes, Revealing Gene Gain and Lose Dynamics in Genome Evolution. PLoS Pathogens, 11, e1004801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J., Kou, Y., Bao, J., Li, Y., Tang, M., Zhu, X., Ponaya, A., Xiao, G., Li, J., Li, C., Song, M.Y., Cumagun, C.J., Deng, Q., Lu, G., Jeon, J.S., Naqvi, N.I. and Zhou, B. (2015) Comparative Genomics Identifies the Magnaporthe oryzae Avirulence Effector AvrPi9 That Triggers Pi9-Mediated Blast Resistance in Rice. New Phytologist, 206, 1463-1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13310</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, K.P., Bao, J.D., Zhang, L.H., Yang, X., Li, Y., Zhu, M.H., Lin, Q.Y., Zhao, A., Zhao, Z., Zhou, B. and Lu, G.D. (2017) Comparative Analysis of the Genome of the Field Isolate V86010 of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae from Philippines. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 60345-30357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61607-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, G., Zhang, K., Huang, H., Zhang, H., Zhao, A., Chen, L., Chen, R., Li, G., Wang, Z. and Lu, G.D. (2017) Multiprotein-Bridging Factor 1 Regulates Vegetative Growth, Osmotic Stress, and Virulence in Magnaporthe oryzae. Current Genetics, 63, 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-016-0636-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Samarrai, T.H. and Schmid, J. (2000) A Simple Method for Extraction of Fungal Genomic DNA. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 30, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00664.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A.L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C. and Salzberg, S.L. (2004) Versatile and Open Software for Comparing Large Genomes. Genome Biology, 5, R12. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonnhammer, E.L., von Heijne, G. and Krogh, A. (1998) A Hidden Markov Model for Predicting Transmembrane Helices in Protein Sequences. Proceedings International Conference Intelligent Systems Molecular Biology, Vol. 6, 175-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petersen, T.N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. and Nielsen, H. (2011) SignalP 4.0: Discriminating Signal Peptides from Transmembrane Regions. Nature Methods, 8, 785-786. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slater, G.S. and Birney, E. (2005) Automated Generation of Heuristics for Biological Sequence Comparison. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearson, W.R. (1996) Effective Protein Sequence Comparison. Methods in Enzymology, 266, 227-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(96)66017-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W., Su, J., Chen, K., Yang, J., Chen, S., Wang, C., Feng, A., Wang, Z., Wei, X., Zhu, X., Lu, G.D. and Zhou, B. (2021) Dynamics of the Rice Blast Fungal Population in the Field after Deployment of an Improved Rice Variety Containing Known Resistance Genes. Plant Disease, 105, 919-928. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1348-RE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Birren, B., Berger, B. and Lander, E.S. (2004) Methods in Comparative Genomics: Genome Correspondence, Gene Identification and Regulatory Motif Discovery. Journal of Computational Biology, 11, 319-355. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1348-RE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Novo, M., Bigey, F., Beyne, E., Galeote, V., Gavory, F., Mallet, S., Cambon, B., Legras, J.L., Wincker, P., Casaregola, S. and Dequin, S. (2009) Eukaryote-to-Eukaryote Gene Transfer Events Revealed by the Genome Sequence of the Wine Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proceedings National Academy Sciences USA, 106, 16333-16338. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904673106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andersen, M.R., Salazar, M.P., Schaap, P.J., van de Vondervoort, P.J., Culley, D., Thykaer, J., Frisvad, J.C., Nielsen, K.F., Albang, R., Albermann, K., Berka, R.M., Braus, G.H., et al. (2011) Comparative Genomics of Citric-Acid-Producing Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 versus Enzyme-Producing CBS 513.88. Genome Research, 21, 885-897. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112169.110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chuma, I., Isobe, C., Hotta, Y., Ibaragi, K., Futamata, N., Kusaba, M., Yoshida, K., Terauchi, R., Fujita, Y., Nakayashiki, H., Valent, B. and Tosa, Y. (2011) Multiple Translocation of the AVR-Pita Effector Gene among Chromosomes of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and Related Species. PLoS Pathogens, 7, e1002147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, W., Wang, B., Wu, J., Lu, G., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Han, B., Wang, Z. and Zhou, B. (2009) The Magnaporthe oryzae Avirulence Gene AvrPiz-t Encodes a Predicted Secreted Protein That Triggers the Immunity in Rice Mediated by the Blast Resistance Gene Piz-t. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 22, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-22-4-0411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, S., Wang, L., Wu, W., He, L., Yang, X. and Pan, Q. (2015) Function and Evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae Avirulence Gene AvrPib Responding to the Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pib. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 11642. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olukayode, T., Quime, B., Shen, Y.C., Yanoria, M.J., Zhang, S., Yang, J., Zhu, X., Shen, W.C., von Tiedemann, A. and Zhou, B. (2019) Dynamic Insertion of Pot3 in AvrPib Prevailing in a Field Rice Blast Population in the Philippines Led to the High Virulence Frequency against the Resistance Gene Pib in Rice. Phytopathology, 109, 870-877. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-18-0198-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kanzaki, H., Yoshida, K., Saitoh, H., Fujisaki, K., Hirabuchi, A., Alaux, L., Fournier, E., Tharreau, D. and Terauchi, R. (2012) Arms Race Co-Evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae AVR-Pik and Rice Pik Genes Driven by Their Physical Interactions. Plant Journal, 72, 894-907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05110.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Su, J., Wang, W., Han, J., Chen, S., Wang, C., Zeng, L., Feng, A., Yang, J., Zhou, B. and Zhu, X. (2015) Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Results in a Novel Blast Resistance Gene Pi50 at the Pi2/9 Locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 128, 2213-2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2579-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, Y., Zhai, K., Xie, Z., Yang, D., Zhu, X., Liu, J., Wang, X., Qin, P., Yang, Y., Zhang, G., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Wu, S., Milazzo, J., Mao, B., Wang, E., Xie, H., Tharreau, D. and He, Z. (2017) Epigenetic Regulation of Antagonistic Receptors Confers Rice Blast Resistance with Yield Balance. Science, 355, 962-965. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heath, M.C. (1981) A Generalized Concept of Host-Parasite Specificity. Phytopathology, 71, 1121-1123. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-71-1121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kang, S., Sweigard, J.A. and Valent, B. (1995) The PWL Host Specificity Gene Family in the Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8, 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-8-0939</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miki, S., Matsui, K., Kito, H., Otsuka, K., Ashizawa, T., Yasuda, N., Fukiya, S., Sato, J., Hirayae, K., Fujita, Y., Nakajima, T., Tomita, F. and Sone, T. (2009) Molecular Cloning and Characterization of the AVR-Pia Locus from a Japanese Field Isolate of Magnaporthe oryzae. Molecular Plant Pathology, 10, 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00534.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110365-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ribot, C., Césari, S., Abidi, I., Chalvon, V., Bournaud, C., Vallet, J., Lebrun, M.H., Morel, J.B. and Kroj, T. (2013) The Magnaporthe oryzae Effector AVR1-CO39 Is Translocated into Rice Cells Independently of a Fungal-Derived Machinery. Plant Journal, 74, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12099</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>