<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Stomatology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8709</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojst.2021.116021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJST-110184</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Status of Oral Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulism at the University Clinics of Kinshasa (CUK), DR Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>I.</surname><given-names>B. J. P. Sekele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>K. H. Ntumba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>P.</surname><given-names>S. J. Lutula</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>N. P. Sekele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B.</surname><given-names>F. Nymi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kinshasa University, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Prosthodontics Service, Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kinshasa University, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National Center Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Research Innovation and Technology, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: The present work aimed to identify the most common edentulousness and prosthesis type (prosthetic treatment), to improve the management in oral prosthetic rehabilitation in DR Congo. 
  Material and Methods: It was a documentary, longitudinal, and retrospective study of the medical records of edentulous patients admitted to the prosthetic service of the Dental Department/Kinshasa University from January 1983 to December 2020. Age, sex, cause of teeth loss, and prosthetic treatment (partial removable prosthesis, complete removable prosthesis) were evaluated. The Chare square test was performed to compare significant differences between the variables and the P-value &lt; 0.05 was set as significant. 
  Results: One thousand six hundred and ninety patients in that 901 were men (47 &#177; 16 years) and 789 women (42 &#177; 15 years) had undergone prosthetic treatment. One thousand eight hundred and forty-four edentulous teeth were viewed according to the Kennedy classification. Kennedy class 1 was the most predominant (61.4%) followed by Kennedy class 3 (24.8%). Two thousand one hundred and ninety-one prostheses were performed. The removable partial prosthesis with plate (acrylic resin) was the most performed (78.8%; n = 1727) and followed by the joint (17.4%; n = 384). Dental caries (52.6%) and periodontitis (36.4%) were the main causes of these edentulous teeth. 
  Conclusion: The present study showed that edentulism is becoming a concern for the implementation of a real oral health policy.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Prosthetic Rehabilitation</kwd><kwd> Edentulousness</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The teeth, an integral part of the maxillary and mandibular arches, play a crucial role in the performance of the function, such as mastication, sucking, gustation, phonation, swallowing and salivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref1">1</xref>]. Despite a clear evolution of dental medicine for the prevention and treatment of caries, periodontitis, and other oral pathologies, it is of utmost importance to note that dental loss continues to be a concern of the populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref2">2</xref>]. Epidemiological studies in African and world societies reveal that 3% of anterior-premolar teeth and 90% of molars are extracted due to caries and periodontitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref6">6</xref>]. The stomatological studies carried out in DR Congo had shown that the majority of teeth are extracted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref8">8</xref>]. As a result, there are a high number of edentulous teeth, both posterior and anterior. These gaps are largely uncompensated because of the population’s lack of knowledge of the negative impact of tooth loss on the quality of life. These lost teeth should necessarily be replaced to avoid harmful consequences on general health and oral health, in particular for the stomatognathic system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Prosthetic oral rehabilitation of edentulous teeth is one of the treatments that can restore and preserve the patient’s oral function, comfort, appearance, and health by replacing the missing teeth, as well as the peripheral and maxillofacial tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref10">10</xref>]. This study aimed to identify the most common edentulism, the type of prosthesis performed, and to determine the causes of teeth loss to improve the management of prosthetic oral rehabilitation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>It was a was documentary, longitudinal, and retrospective study of the medical record of edentulous patients admitted to the prosthetic service of the Dental Department/Kinshasa University from January 1983 to December 2020, either 38 years. The choice of this period was dictated by the relative abundance of prosthetic work done. It is in line with the awareness of the population and health legislators on the fact that partial or very edentulous patients are currently classified in the category of people living with disabilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref11">11</xref>]. Inclusion criteria was those medicals records that containing the sociodemographic parameter, date of admission to Kinshasa University Hospital, reported cause of the losing tooth loss, and Prosthetic or non-prosthetic treatment. However, all cases in which tooth loss involved only the wisdom tooth(s) were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, percentage) was carried out and the Chare square test was performed to compare differences between the variables. The P-value &lt; 0.05 was set as significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The results of this study are based on 1690 records of patients restored in dental prosthesis Service out of 43,265 records registered and consulted the services. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that Kennedy class 1 is the most fitted (61.4%) followed by class 3 (24.9%); (p = 0.05). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that out of the total of 1844 edentulous teeth, the maxilla was most affected (59.4%; n = 1094) than the mandible (40.6%; n = 750) with a significant difference (p = 0.00) The removable partial prosthesis (RPP) in acrylic resin was dominates with 78.8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and dental caries and periodontitis are the main causes of tooth loss (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The difference is significant for periodontitis between male and female subjects (p = 0.00).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of edentulousness of patients fitted by Kennedy class and by gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Kennedy Class</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Male</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >658 (35.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477 (25.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (2.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76 (4.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263 (14.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199 (10.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (1.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (2.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (1.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (0.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1036 (56.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >808 (43.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of edentulousness of the patients fitted according to the dental arches</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Kennedy Class</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Maxilla. n = 1094 (59.2%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mandible. n = 750 (40.6%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382 (20.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263 (14.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >645 (34.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277 (14.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214 (11.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >491 (26.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (2.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (0.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (2.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160 (8.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129 (6.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288 (15.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173 (9.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (1.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (1.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (0.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (0.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (1.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K class V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (0.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (0.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (1.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (0.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (0.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >615 (33.3 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >479 (25.9 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1094 (59.2 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >421 (22.8 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329 (17.8 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750 (40.6 )</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of the types of prosthesis performed ad gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prosthesis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Male</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RPP acrylic resin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >752</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R P. Complete</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. Fixed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P.A. Surgical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99,9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: R. P. = removable prosthesis.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of the causes of tooth loss of the patients with dentures according to sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Causes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Male</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Female</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 901</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carie and/ or its complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Periodontitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other causes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >901</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: N = number of patients.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The results of this study indicate that posterior tooth loss was most in the maxilla and in the male contrary to several studies indicated that posterior loss was most pronounced in the mandible and in the female subjects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref15">15</xref>]. Kennedy’s class I constitutes 61.4% of the edentulous teeth in our sample. This observation is confirmed by the study of Mumghamba et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref16">16</xref>] who report that Kennedy’s class 1 accounts for 86.6% of oral rehabilitation in Tanzania. This high frequency of posterior tooth loss in both sexes may justify by the fact that the reduction in the quality of life of DR Congolese patients, especially in its masticatory component, can lead to gastrointestinal disorders and a decrease in calorie intake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref9">9</xref>]. Furthermore, our study shows that 52.6% of people at the Kinshasa University Hospital have lost their teeth due to caries and/or its complications. The present results corroborate those of other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref18">18</xref>] which have shown that dental caries are the main cause of dental extractions during the first four decades of human life in Asia, Europe, America, and Africa.</p><p>As for periodontal losses (36.4%), our results corroborate the Dannewitz study conducted on periodontal losses in Africa and other countries of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref19">19</xref>]. Certain maxillofacial pathologies as well as trauma often require ablation and are mostly accompanied by a more or less important dento-osseous loss depending on the case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref21">21</xref>]. From this study, it appears that in thirty-eight years, the prosthetic service of the Dental Department, the PAP in acrylic resin (78.8%) was much performed compared to other types of prosthesis. This may be explained by the fact that the socio-economic level of the population is low and some patients prefer to live with this disability. Although those who have lost a large number of teeth have weakened subjective and objective health; their edentulousness can be rehabilitated by offering good quality acrylic resin partial dentures that are regularly checked [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110184-ref22">22</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Unrehabilitated edentulous Kennedy class I, II, and III patients may have negative consequences related to mastication and quality of life in Oral and General Health. Taking into account the large proportion (78.8%) of acrylic resin RPs made in 38 years, the randomized prospective interventional cohort study should be conducted to highlight the pathological changes amplified by PAPs on oral health and to determine the impact of wearing or not wearing PAPs on quality of life.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sekele, I.B.J.P., Ntumba, M.K.H., Lutula, P.S.J., Sekele, M.N.P. and Nymi, B.F. (2021) Status of Oral Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulism at the University Clinics of Kinshasa (CUK), DR Congo. Open Journal of Stomatology, 11, 244-249. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2021.116021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.110184-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azerad, J. (1992) Physiology of Manducation. Masson, Paris, 16-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chastang, S. (2002) Existe-t-il une corrélation entre les doléances du patient et les observations du praticien en prothèse adjointe complète: Observations cliniques sur 53 cas. Thèse-Université Paris 7, Paris, 2-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odusanya, S.A. (1987) Tooth Loss among Nigerians: Causes and Pattern of Mortality. International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Surgery, 16, 184-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(87)80128-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lutula, P.S.J. (1990) Evaluation of the Oral Health of the Bantu Population of Zaire (Epidemiological Study). K.U. Leuven. Thesis, Leuven, 86-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angelillo, I.F., Nobile, C.G. and Pavia, M. (1996) Survey of Reasons for Extraction of Permanent Teeth in Italy. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 24, 336-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00872.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aida, J., Ando, Y., Akhter, R., Aoyama, H., Masui, M. and Morita, M. (2006) Reasons for Permanent Tooth Extractions in Japan. Journal of Epidemiology, 16, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.16.214</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Horton</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1979</year>)<article-title>Dental Survey in Zaire</article-title><source> Tropical Dentistry Journal</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 19</fpage>-<lpage>24</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuku-Tuku, K.A., Kikaya, K.M.E., Sekele, I.B.J. and Sofi, K.D.P. (1989) Les causes d’extraction dentaire en milieu hospitalier à Kinshasa. Journal of Head and Neck Pathology, 3, 98-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutton, B., Feine, J. and Morais, J. (2002) Is There an Association between Edentulous and Nutritional State? Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 68, 182-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Owall, B., Kayser, A.F. and Carlsson, G.E. (1996) Dental Prosthetics: Principles and Therapeutic Strategies—Data on Prosthetics Worldwide. Masson Ed., Stafford, 9-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2000) Prevalence of Total Edentulism (%) in the Elderly in Selected Countries. WHO Oral Health Database and WHO Country/Regional Oral Health Profiles Program, 3-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baqain, Z.H., Khraisat, A., Sawair, F., Ghanam, S., Shaini, F.J. and Rajab, L.D. (2007) Dental Extraction for Patients Presenting at Oral Surgery Student Clinic. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 28, 146-150; Quiz 151-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bahrami, G., Vaeth, M., Kirkevang, L.-L., Wenzel, A. and Isidor, F. (2008) Risk Factors for Tooth Loss in an Adult Population: A Radiographic Study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35, 1059-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01328.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Susin, C., Oppermann, R.V., Haugejorden, O. and Albandar, J.M. (2005) Tooth Loss and Associated Risk Indicators in Adult Urban Population from South Brazil. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 63, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350510019694</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kida, I.A., Astrom, A.N., Strand, G.V. and Masalu, J.R. (2006) Clinical and Socio-Behavioral Correlates of Tooth Loss: A Study of Older Adults in Tanzania. BMC Oral Health, 6, Article No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-6-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mumghamba, E.G. and Fabian, F.M. (2005) Tooth Loss among Habitual Chewing-Stick and Plastic Toothbrust Users in the Adult Population of Mtwara, Rural Tanzania. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 3, 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2005.00131.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanya, B.O., Ng’ang’a, P.M. and Ng’ang’a, R.N. (2004) Causes and Pattern of Missing Permanent Teeth among Kenyans. East African Medical Journal, 81, 322-325. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v81i6.9183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spalj, S., Planca, K.D., Juriat, H., Pavelia, B. and Bosnjaka, A. (2004) Reasons for Extraction of Permanent Teeth in Urban and Rural Population of Croatia. Collegium Antropologicum, 28, 833-839.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dannewitz, B., Krieger, J.K., Hüsing, J. and Eickholz, P. (2006) Loss of Molars in Periodontally Treated Patients: A Retrospective Analysis Five Years or More after Periodontal Treatment. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 33, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00858.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dilu, N.J. and Sekele, I.B. (2000) Loss of Substance of the Maxilla and Its Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Kinshasa. Congo Médical, 4, 314-319.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntumba, M.K.H., Sekele, I.B.J. and Mbianshu, M.R. (2000) Removable Partial Dento-Surgical Mandibular Prosthesis. A Propos d’un Cas. Congo Medical, 2, 1095-1097.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110184-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sekele, I.B., Naert, I., Lutula, P.S., Ntumba, M.K., Bolenge, I., Kaba, K., Mayunga, G.M. and Dzaringa, G.T. (2016) Influence of Acrylic Resin Partial Denture on Oral Health and Quality of Life. Odonto-Stomatologie Tropicale, 39, 36-46.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>