<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2021.116014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-110091</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Petrological and Geochemical Studies on the Si-Undersaturated Rocks of the Mount Cameroon: Genesis of the Camptonite and Nephelinite at the Cameroon Hot Line
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ntoumbé</surname><given-names>Mama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amaya</surname><given-names>Adama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diguim</surname><given-names>Kepnamou Amadou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbowou</surname><given-names>Gambie Isaac Bertrand</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naimou</surname><given-names>Seguem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ngounouno</surname><given-names>Ismaïla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Adam Barka of Abeche, Abeche, Chad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mines Geology, School of Geology and Mining Engineering, University of Ngaoundere, Meiganga, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Geomatic and Geology Mapping, School of Geology and Mining Engineering, University of Ngaoundere, Meiganga, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>252</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Cameroon hot line is dominated by magmatic rocks. The variations of magma and chemistry are generally due to the difference of physical conditions and chemistry in the magma source region during the ascent of magma. The Mt Etinde and the Mt Cameroon, both edifices belong to the Cameroon Hot line, have a particularity some rare rocks such as camptonite and nephelinite. The relationship between the silica undersaturated rocks in the both edifices is characterized by the lateral variation appear through the petrography of the different rocks. The concerned geochemical data allow to compare the Mount Etinde nephelinite and Mount Cameroon camptonite where the differentiation process reflects geochemical affinities from a basaltic magma source on the Cameroon hot line. The compatible elements between the Mount Etinde nephelinite and the Mount Cameroon camptonite and basalt correlate with the difference in modal compositions of mineral phases. The lateral variation of major and trace element contents in the Mount Cameroon camptonite and Mount Etinde nephelinite seem to be related to the difference in the fractional crystallization processes of mineral phases, the difference in the partial melting processes and the metasomatism source rich in volatile. The silica-undersaturated character of the camptonite and nephelinite could be attributed to assimilation of carbonate rocks within depth-level magma chambers. Trace element AFC modelling revealed that the parental magmas of both edifice volcanic rocks were mostly affected by fractional crystallisation coupled with metasomatism process in Ca rich source.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nephelinite</kwd><kwd> Camptonite</kwd><kwd> Link</kwd><kwd> Source</kwd><kwd> Cameroon Hot Line</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Mount Cameroon 4˚1'N - 9˚6'E and 4˚19'N - 9˚15'E is located in south-western Cameroon Region and rises from the Atlantic coast to a height of 4095 m. Mount Etinde is a small densely forested and highly dissected volcano located on the SW ﬂank of Mount Cameroon. It situated on the south-westely side of the Mount Cameroon volcano (one of Africa’s most active volcanoes), between latitude 4˚1' and 4˚6' and longitude 9˚5'E and 9˚8'E, along the Atlantic coast of West Africa. It raises to a height of 1713 m with the lavas compositions entirely of the silica undersaturated rocks (i.e. nephelinites). The Mount Cameroon is extensively covered by cinder cones, explosive craters, where lava flows and scoraceous lapilli cover a total area of ~1116 km<sup>2</sup> included the Mount Etinde edifice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref1">1</xref>]. The Mount Cameroon and Etinde Mountain belong to the CHL, both edifices which are characterized by the occurrence of the silica undersaturated rocks unless abundant in the Cameroon Hot line. The Cameroon Hot Line/Cameroon Volcanic Line/Cameroon Line (CL) as well as many other volcanic provinces across the African plate is characterized by associations of Tertiary to recent volcanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref2">2</xref>]. It forms one of the major geologic lineaments of the African plate. It is evident that the contention over its geodynamic origin of the megastructure which across the Cameroon country along the 1600 km is linked of the complex features on the linear alignment of the volcanoes but lack of a consistent time-space migration. The Cameroon hot line is dominated by magmatic rocks. The variations of magma and chemistry are generally due to the difference of physical conditions and chemistry in the magma source region during the ascent of magma. Magmatic rocks are differentiated by several petrological processes such as 1) different degrees of melting of the source rocks, 2) crystal fractionation in magma chambers (fractional crystallization, FC), 3) contamination of the magma via assimilation of the wall-rocks (assimilation), and 4) mixing of magmas of different compositions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref3">3</xref>]. Specially, Etinde Mountain occur a particularity petrography of the nephelinite while it shares the same basement rocks of the Mount Cameroon which, addition to the dominating of the basaltic lavas, present other rare rocks such as camptonite. In this paper, ten samples from three different localities and four different rocks types have been studied (nephelinite or clinopyroxene nephelinite, basalt and camptonite) to compare major and trace elements and discuss the relationship between the silica undersaturated rocks in the both edifice: Mount Cameroon camptonite rocks and Mount Etinde nephelinite which characterize the lateral variation appear through the petrography of the different rocks.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting</title><p>The Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL), also called the Cameroon Line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref4">4</xref>] or Cameroon Hot Line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref5">5</xref>], is made up of an alignment of mountains trending N30˚ and is divided into two parts: an oceanic part with volcanic islands of Gulf of Guinea and a continental part characterized by volcanic eruptions of Mount Cameroon and deadly gas emissions from lakes Monoun in 1984 and Nyos in 1986, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The Cameroon Hot line or Cameroon line consist of two sections: The oceanic section and the continental section. The oceanic section lies within the Gulf of Guinea consisting of the islands of Pagalu, S&#227;o Tom&#233;, Principe, and Bioko and the continental section is made the several volcanic mountains by an alternation of horsts and grabens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref6">6</xref>]. Main mountains are mount (Mt) Cameroon (4095 m) which is the highest and the most active volcanoes of the CVL, mainly formed by alkaline basalts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Mount Cameroon is typically a basaltic volcano that forms part of a long line of volcanoes referred to regionally as the Cameroon Hot line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref5">5</xref>] against the Mount Etinde which is stratovolcanco cone consisting of layered nephelinitic tuff, nephelinite to hauyne melilite or garnet-red, leucito-nephelinite to hauynophyres [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref9">9</xref>]. The mount Etinde edifice shows a depression at 4˚5'E and 9˚6'N which can be interpreted as the collapse of the volcanic products during the destabilization of the flank and/or the flaring of lavas frightening a bed due to the tension of the flank. Several geological and geophysical studies have been specially carried the mount Cameroon volcano and out along the CVL to understand its structure, origin and evolution in general. Mount Cameroon and Mount Etinde share the same basement rocks with the volcanoes. They are characterized by the eruption of a type but with proximal pahoehoe occurring locally near the vents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref10">10</xref>]. According by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref11">11</xref>] the presence of the nephelinite rocks and camptonite rocks in the same block of the volcano, both volcanic rocks silica-undersaturated, show clearly a link with the tectonic process in opening zone as well as Atlantic Ocean which belong to extension domain along to the Cameroon Hot line.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Petrography and Mineral Composition</title><p>In addition to samples collected for this study, the investigated nephelinite samples are petrographically fresh, contain secondary minerals and are mostly porphyritic or slightly porphyric. The mineral phases are often characterized by euhedral and subhedral crystal habits. Clinopyroxene phenocrysts and microphenocrysts sometimes show columnar habit. The groudmass comprises clinopyroxene, titano-magnetite, and nepheline. A detail petrographic and mineralogy from Mount Etinde nephelinitic rocks are presented by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref13">13</xref>]. Mineral assemblage of the basalt C10J reveals clinopyroxene, amphibole and biotite against Mt Cameroon camptonites which contain phenocrysts of clinopyroxene or olivine, plagioclase, amphibole and biotite and titanomagnetite scattered in a groundmass of the same minerals and also contain nepheline or analcime and carbonate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref14">14</xref>]. The mineral assemblages of the nephelinite are similar of the camptonite (C10H) with the small difference in the representative modal mineral. Petrographically and mineralogy of the Mt Etinde nephelinite and Camptonite are quite similar and have porphyritic texture except for the absence of plagioclase in the nephelinite.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Geochemistry</title><p>Analytical procedures</p><p>Analytical data for major and trace elements determined of the Mt Etinde nephelinite and Mt Cameroon camptonite and basalt were done in based on electron microprobe instrument (CAMEBAX SX 50 at the University of Marie Curie, Paris) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Major elements</p><p>The whole-rock compositions of the studied samples are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. A slightly lower content of MnO is also typical of the Cameroon hot line. The classification of the samples, based on the total alkali-silica diagram <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref15">15</xref>] show the Mt. Cameroon camptonite, basalt and Mount Etinde nephelinite plot in two major fields. Difference in the fractionation processes resulted in the differences in differentiation index (D.I.) variation. Major elements chemical analyses for the representative rock samples along with their CIPW norms and DI are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The differentiation index ranges from 14.15 to 54.61 and confirm the alkali nature of the studied samples in the two edifices (Mount Cameroon and Mount Etinde). Analysis of behaviour of the major elements in all sample indicated the presence of one group of rock which, differed in silica and alkali contents but with the alkali affinity. Variation in major elements against D.I. is shown on the variation diagrams of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The CaO and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> demonstrated opposite trends. Concentration of major oxides such as MgO, CaO, show a negative correlation with increase in D.I. while TiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, K<sub>2</sub>O are increased. With increasing D.I. the alkali contents are scattered although Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> decreases slightly from theTiO<sub>2</sub>, CaO and K<sub>2</sub>O. This is due probably to the early crystallization of the different minerals phases.</p><p>The CaO and MgO decrease with increasing DI reflects clinopyroxene fractionation affected by crystallisation of carbonate minerals. The characteristic features of this suite are the high CaO for nephelinite (11.2% - 16.2%) compared of the Mount Cameroon camptonite (8.4% - 10.7% and low alkali contents of the primitive lavas, in sharp contrast to the primitive high-k basalt.C10J.</p><p>Trace elements</p><p>The normalized abundance of incompatible elements in representative rocks is demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. This diagram shows abundance patterns of moderaly highly compatible elements normalized concentrations in the primitive mantle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref16">16</xref>]. The content of Zr and Nb in the analysed nephelinite range from</p><p>183 to 728 and from 39 to 267 respectively and highest the camptonite and basalt. The compatible elements, Ni, Cr, Co, and Sc are more concentrated in ferromagnesian minerals than in coexisting melt in the silica undersaturated rocks excepted the basalts C10J with high Ni = 275 ppm. All rocks show similar distribution patterns, though their elemental contents may differ by some elements (Ba and Yb). Several geochemical studies have been carried the mount Cameroon showed that alkali basalts are enriched in Sr, Ba and Rb, but depleted in Ta, K, P, Nb and Ti as compared with the samples collected from the location on the Mount Etinde [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref18">18</xref>]. All rocks were depleted in K, P and Ti and this character are typical of alkaline rocks.</p><p>The studied samples rocks of both edifices present fractionated rare earth element (REE) patterns in chondrite-normalised REE plots. A chondrite normalised REE diagrams of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref16">16</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) shows LREE enrichment versus HREE from basalt to nephelinite. Highly fractionated REE compositions of selected</p><p>representative samples of the all samples are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. Mount Etinde nephelinite show chondrite-normalized REE patterns similar to that of the Mount Cameroon camptonite. The spectrum of nephelinite and camptonite are superimposed and are parallel with basalt which considering as well as the primitive sample. Chondrite normalised REE patterns present LREE the strong enrichment relative to HREE, similar to other alkali rocks from the Cameroon Hot Line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref20">20</xref>]. The rare-earth element compositions of basaltic, camptonite rocks from Mount Cameroon and nephelinite rocks are given for comparaison in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Representative analysis of all studied samples (Mt Etinde nephelinite, camptonite and basalt from Mt Cameroon)</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >(W%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME33</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME23</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME44</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME22</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C10K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C10H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C10J</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME111</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME150</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ME20</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >736</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1645</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3622</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >777</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2543</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1387</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3311</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >605</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >504</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >La</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >431</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >11</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >30</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >19</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >20</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >15</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >294</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Er</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="11"  >CIPW norms (calculated with 1.5W% Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) and differentiation index (D.I.)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Or</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >An</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Di</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Il</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.642</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>The samples of Mount Cameroon and Mt Etinde were product of a low degree of partial melting (−0.28) probably of a mantle peridotite enriched in incompatible elements (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref21">21</xref>]. The possibility of crustal assimilation has an impact upon isotopic and incompatible trace element compositions in the different crustal levels during the magma staying in magma chambers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref22">22</xref>]. The theoretical curves produced after using the Petromodeler software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref23">23</xref>] show different values of r = 0.4 (the ratio of the rate of assimilation to the rate of FC), F = 0.63. The results obtained from PCF, AFC and IFC modelling using Upper Continental Crust [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref24">24</xref>] as contaminating rocks put in evidence the assimilation of carbonates during the evolution of the Si-undersaturated rocks of the Cameroon hot line (e. g. nephelinitic rocks and camptonites). The silica undersaturated character of the both edifice of the CHL is linked of the effect of the rock rich in carbonate assimilated during metasomatism process in the mantle source. According by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref28">28</xref>], Si-undersaturated contaminated magmas can be a consequence of carbonate rock assimilation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>A major process responsible for variation in the composition of nephelinite and camptonite rocks must be fractional crystallization significant. The variation of mafic phenocryst mineral assemblages suggested that the parental magma generated. The lateral variations in compatible elements are consistent with the variation of the content of pyroxene especially diopside between the camptonite and nephelinite highest of clinopyroxene. The samples from Mount Cameroon and mount Etinde were derived from a mantle source contaminated by metasomatic solutions bearing K, Ba, Sr, and Rb and or melts released from the underlying continental plate. The relatively high L.O.I. contents of the nephelinite rocks and primitive basalt are mostly related to alteration to low-temperature phases and the presence of the minor amount of secondary minerals such as zeolites and analcime. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref30">30</xref>] suggest that the K negative anomaly is characteristic of the mantle source type of HIMU. The Mount Cameroon camptonites have high incompatible element contents and contain hydrated (kaersuite, biotite) and/or carbonate minerals suggesting that they originate from a volatile-rich intra-lithospheric metasomatized peridotite mantle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref9">9</xref>], the investigated nephelinetic rocks are generated from mantle sources that were modified by pneumatholitic components, which were derived from basaltic magma. As seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the REE patterns of basaltic and camptonite rocks from Mount Cameroon have REE patterns similar to Mt Etinde samples (nephelinetic rocks). These comparable patterns reflect that the studied rocks of Mount Etinde may have been derived from a similar mantle source.</p><p>The different data allow for the comparison of the Mount Etinde and Mount Cameroon edifice to reflect the differentiation process, which show their geochemical affinities relative to probable sources from basaltic magma by the Petromodeler software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref3">3</xref>]. The results were compared with data from other lavas along the Cameroon Volcanic Line.</p><p>The linear-like trends on Harker diagrams of the studied samples suggest that fractional crystallisation played an important role in their evolution through the different mineral phases. The observed correlations in the Harker diagrams for the Mount Cameroon camptonite and Mount Etinde nephelinite compared of the other rocks of the Cameroon Hot Line probably reflect the significant role of fractional crystallisation processes during their evolution of magmatism in the geodynamic context of Cameroon hot line.</p><p>Despite similar REE patterns, camptonite and basalt exhibit less pronounced LREE enrichment than nephelinitic rocks. This enrichment patterns suggests that rocks come from a same source regions, which are enriched in the LREE. The information obtained from the comparison of the spectra nephelinite, camptonite and basalt are almost parallel, implying that they could be related by the fractional of the mineral phases. The REE variation in igneous rocks can be used to evaluate partial melting rates in their sources, where low partial melting generates magmas with a high Ce/Yb ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.110091-ref31">31</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The abundance and distribution of elements in the nephelinite and camptonite samples have been controlled by one or more different geological factors in the Cameroon Hot line. The differences in the compatible elements between the Mount Etinde nephelinite and the Mount Cameroon camptonite and basalt correlate with the difference in modal compositions of mineral phases. The patterns of samples are almost parallel, implying that they could be related by the fractional of a phase that doesn’t change the REE. This enrichment patterns suggests that lavas come from source regions, which are enriched in the LREE. The lateral variation of major and trace element contents in the Mount Cameroon camptonite and Mount Etinde nephelinite seem to be related to the difference in the fractional crystallization processes as well as the difference in the partial melting processes and the metasomatism source rich in volatile. Based on geochemical data, the silica-undersaturated character of the camptonite and nephelinite could be attributed to assimilation of carbonate rocks within depth-level magma chambers. Trace element AFC modelling revealed that the parental magmas of both edifice volcanic rocks were mostly affected by fractional crystallisation coupled with metasomatism process in a similar source rich in Ca.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Thanks go to anonymous reviewers for their critical reviews of the manuscript, the members of the scientific team of OJG and the microprobe analyses were performed during the stay of the last author (Ngounouno. I.) based on electron microprobe instrument (CAMEBAX SX 50) at the University of Marie Curie, Paris V.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mama, N., Adama, A., Amadou, D.K., Bertrand, M.G.I., Seguem, N. and Isma&#239;la, N. (2021) Petrological and Geochemical Studies on the Si-Undersaturated Rocks of the Mount Cameroon: Genesis of the Camptonite and Nephelinite at the Cameroon Hot Line. Open Journal of Geology, 11, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2021.116014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.110091-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njome, M.S., Suh, C.E., Sparks, R.J., Ayonghe, S.N. and Fitton, G.J. (2007) The Mount Cameroon 1959 Compound Lava Flow Field: Morphology, Petrography and Geochemistry. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-007-1245-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Njonfang, E., Nono, A., Kamgang, P., Ngako, V. and Tchoua, F.M. (2011) Cameroon Line Magmatism (Central Africa): A Reappraisal. In: Beccaluva, L., Bianchini, G. and Wilson, M., Ed., Volcanism and Evolution of the African Lithosphere, GSA, London, Special Paper 478, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1130/2011.2478(09)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ersoy, Y. and Helvaci, C. (2010) FC-AFC-FCA and Mixing Modeler: A Microsoft&amp;#174; Excel&amp;#169; Spreadsheet Program for Modeling Geochemical Differentiations of Magma by Crystal Fractionations, Crustal Assimilation and Mixing. Computers and Geosciences, 36, 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngako, V., Njonfang, E., Tongwa, A.F., Affaton, P. and Metuk, N.J. (2006) The North-South Paleozoic to Quaternary Trend of Alkaline Magmatism from Niger-Nigeria to Cameroon: Complex Interaction between Hotspots and Precambrian Faults. Journal of Africa Earth Science, 45, 241-256.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2006.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Déruelle, B., Ngounouno, I. and Demaiffe, D. (2007) The “Cameroon Hot Line” (CHL): A Unique Example of Active Alkaline Intraplate Structure in Both Oceanic and Continental Lithospheres. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339, 589-600.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkouathio, D.G., Kagou, D.A., Bardintzeff, J.M., Wandji, P., Bellon, H. and Pouclet, A. (2008) Evolution of Volcanism in Graben and Horst Structures along the Cenozoic Cameroon Line (Africa): Implications for Tectonic Evolution and Mantle Source Composition. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 94, 287-303.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-008-0018-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yokoyama, T., Aka, F.T., Kusakabe, M. and Nakamura, E. (2007) Plume-Lithosphere Interaction beneath Mt Cameroon Volcano, West Africa: Constraints from 238u-239Th-226Ra and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotope Systematics. Geochimica et Cosmochica Acta, 71, 1835-1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.01.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkoumbou, C., Déruelle, B. and Velde, D. (1995) Petrology of Mt Etinde Nephelinite Series. Journal of Petrology, 36, 376-395.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/36.2.373</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntoumbé, M., Déruelle, B., Gbambie, I. and Ngounouno, I. (2016) New Petrology and Geochemical Data of the Nephelinitic Lavas and Geodynamic Implications of Mount Etinde (Cameroon). International Journal of Geosciences, 7, 1452-1470.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.712101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suh, C.E., Luhr, J.F. and Njome, M.S. (2007) Olivine-Hosted Glass Inclusions in Scoriae Erupted in 1954-2000 at Mount Cameroon Volcano, West Africa. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 169, 1-33.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngounouno, I., Déruelle, B., Montigny, R. and Demaiffe, D. (2006) Les camptonites du Mont Cameroun, Cameroun, Afrique. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 338, 537-544.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2006.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etame, J., Gerad, M., Suh, C.E. and Bilong, P. (2009) Halloysite Neoformation during the Zeathering of Nephelinitic Rocks under Humid Tropical Condition at Mt Etinde, Cameroon. Geoderma, 154, 59-68.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etame, J., Suh, C.E., Gerad, M. and Bilong, P. (2012) Phillipsite Formation in Nephelinitic Rocks in Response to Hydrothermal Alteration at Mount Etinde, Cameroon. Chimie der Erde Geochemistry, 72, 31-37.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2011.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngounouno, I., Déruelle, B., Demaiffe, D. and Montigny, R. (2003) Les monchiquites de Tchircotché, Vallée de la haute Bénoué (Nord du Cameroun). Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 335, 289-296.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winchester, J.A. and Floyd, P.A. (1977) Geochemical Discrimination of Different Magma Series and Their Differentiation Products Using Immobile Elements. Chemical Geology, 20, 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, S. and McDonough, W.F. (1989) Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanics Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42, 313-345.  
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamgouot, F.N., Déruelle, B., Mbowou, G.I.B. and Ngounouno, I. (2015) Petrology of the Volcanic Rocks from Bioko Island (“Cameroon Hot Line”). International Journal of Geosciences, 6, 247-255. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2015.63019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chenyi, M.V., Nkouathio, D.G., Wotchoko, P., Djibril, G., Nono, K., Zénon, I., Guedjeo, C.S. and Seuwui, D.T. (2017) Volcanology and Geochemical Study of the Volcanic Rocks of the Bafmeng Area (Mount Oku, Cameroon Volcanic Line). International Journal of Biology Chemistry Sciences, 11, 841-864.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i2.25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngounouno, I., Déruelle, B., Demaiffe, D. and Montigny, R. (2003) Petrology of the Cenozoic Volcanism in the Upper Benue Valley, Northern Cameroon (Central Africa). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 145, 87-106.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-002-0438-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moundi, A., Wandji, P., Bardintzeff, J.M., Ménard, J.J., Okomo, A.L.C., Mouncherou, O.F., Reusser, E., Bellon, H. and Tchoua, F.M. (2007) Les basaltes éocènes à affinité transitionnelle du plateau Bamoun, témoins d’un réservoir mantellique enrichi sous la Ligne Volcanique du Cameroun. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339, 396-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ersoy</surname><given-names> E.Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>PETROMODELER (Petrological Modeler): A Microsoft (R) Excel (R) Spreadsheet Program for Modelling Melting, Mixing, Crystallization and Assimilation Processes in Magmatic Systems</article-title><source> Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 115</fpage>-<lpage>125</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cem, Y., Mehmet, A., Irfan, T., Emel, A. and Gilles, R. (2016) Evolution of K-Rich Magmas Derived from a Net Veined Lithospheric Mantle in an Ongoing Extensional Setting: Geochronology and Geochemistry of Eocene and Miocene Volcanic Rocks from Eastern Pontides (Turkey). Gondwana Research, 45, 65-86.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2016.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Powell</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1984</year>)<article-title>Inversion of the Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization (AFC) Equations; Characterization of Contaminants from Isotope and Trace Element Relationships in Volcanic Suites</article-title><source> Journal of the Geological Society</source><volume> 141</volume>,<fpage> 447</fpage>-<lpage>452</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, S.R. and Mclennan, S.M. (1985) The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peccerillo, A., Federico, M., Barbieri, M., Brilli, M. and Wu, T.W. (2010) Interaction between Ultrapotassic Magmas and Carbonate Rocks: Evidence from Geochemical and Isotopic (Sr, Nd, O) Compositions of Granular Lithic Clasts from the Alban Hills Volcano, Central Italy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 74, 2999-3022.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.02.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gozzi, F., Gaeta, M., Freda, C., Mollo, S., Di Rocco, T., Marra, F., Dallai, L. and Pack, A. (2014) Primary Magmatic Calcite Reveals Origin from Crustal Carbonate. Lithos, 190-191, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prelevic, D., Akal, C., Romer, R.L., Mertz-Kraus, R. and Helvaci, C. (2015) Magmatic Response to Slab Tearing: Constraints from the Afyon Alkaline Volcanic Complex, Western Turkey. Journal of Petrology, 56, 527-562.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egv008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lustrino, M., Prelevic, D., Agostini, S., Gaeta, M., Di Rocco, T., Stagno, V. and Capizzi L.S. (2016) Carich Carbonates Associated with Ultrabasic-Ultramafic Melts: Carbonatite or Limestone Xenoliths? A Case Study from the Late Miocene Morron de Villamayor Volcano (Calatrava Volcanic Field, Central Spain). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 185, 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.02.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chauvel, C., Hofmann, A.W. and Vidal, P. (1992) HIMU-EM: The French Polynesian Connection. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 110, 99-119.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(92)90042-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woodhead, J.D. (1996) Extreme HIMU in an Oceanic Setting: The Geochemistry of Mangaia Island (Polynesia), and Temporal Evolution of the Cook-Austral Hotspot. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 72, 1-19.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(96)00002-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.110091-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rollinson, H.R. (2014) Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation. Routledge, London, 384 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845548</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>