<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7408</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojoph.2021.112013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph-109538</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health Care Staff about Glaucoma in Lom&#233;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Messan</surname><given-names>Kokou Amedome</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Ako Patrick Mensah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kokou</surname><given-names>Vonor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nidain</surname><given-names>Maneh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kossi</surname><given-names>Dzidzinyo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kassoula</surname><given-names>Batomaguéla Nonon Saa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koffi</surname><given-names>Didier Ayena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Komi</surname><given-names>Balo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Campus de Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kara, Kara, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Régional de Kara-Tomdè, Kara, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>H&amp;amp;#244;pital de Bè Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sylvanus Olympio de Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>163</fpage><lpage>175</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Glaucoma is a major cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Early detection and awareness are essential to reduce the impact on eye health. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care staff about glaucoma in Lom&#233;. 
  Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional and descriptive study including health care staff in Lom&#233;, from October 1st to December 31st, 2020, for a period of 3 months. After their agreement, the officers responded to questions based on a survey sheet. 
  Results: A total of 169 agents from 3 centers in Lom&#233;, i.e. the Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital, the Campus University teaching Hospital and the B&#232; Hospital were involved. 50.9% of the agents were male versus 49.1% female, i.e. a ratio of 1.04. The average age was 33.66 &#177; 10.45 years. 46.10% were doctors versus 53.90% paramedics. 58.60% had at most 5 years of experience against 41.40% who had more than 5 years of experience. 53.80% defined glaucoma as ocular hypertension while 17.20% defined it as optic nerve disease. 46.20% did not know that there were many types of glaucomas compared to 53.20% who knew that there are many types of glaucomas. 92.30% knew that glaucoma can lead to cause visual loss. Regarding attitudes and practices about glaucoma, 91.70% declared that the follow-up should be done by the ophthalmologist, 81.10% thought that it would be necessary to be checked by the doctor only every 6 months. Finally, 65.08% declared that they had to use eye drops for life for the treatment. 
  Conclusion: Steps should be taken to educate staff more about glaucoma attitudes and practices and also plan for action in the population.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Knowledge</kwd><kwd> Attitude</kwd><kwd> Practice</kwd><kwd> Glaucoma</kwd><kwd> Lom&#233;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Glaucoma is defined as an optic neuropathy with structural damage (optic disc) and functional (loss of visual field) loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>]. Three major types of glaucoma are observed namely the open-angle glaucoma, the narrow-angle glaucoma and the congenital glaucoma. Each of the first two types can give rise to primary or secondary glaucoma, the latter being secondary to ophthalmic or systemic pathology affecting the optic nerve.</p><p>Glaucomas are the second leading cause of blindness in the world after cataracts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>]. They are the leading cause of irreversible blindness and represent about 15% of all causes of blindness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>]. Of the 45 million blind people in the world, nearly 6 million are believed to be carriers of glaucoma, or 15% of the causes of blindness. According to a meta-analysis by Quigley, the number of glaucomatous patients is estimated at 66 million worldwide.</p><p>In Africa, their number is estimated to be 7,026,000. The severity of the disease is explained by the low rate of diagnosis in developed countries, 50% of cases of glaucoma are not diagnosed, probably at least 75% in less developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>]. All these aspects require, as far as possible, early referral, screening and management for practitioners.</p><p>Previous studies published on glaucoma in Togo in the urban population have shown that patients are not aware of the disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>]. Other similar studies have been carried out in hospitals outside our borders showing a low level of knowledge of glaucoma by healthcare workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Among non-ophthalmologist nursing staff, it is clear that there is a wide range of knowledge about glaucoma. However, none have yet been made among the nursing staff in Lom&#233;. It is with a view to improving prevention and diagnostic strategies, assessing the level of knowledge of the caregiver in case of glaucoma that we conducted this study, the aim of which is to assess the knowledge, practices and attitudes of practitioners about glaucoma.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>We carried out a multicenter study including 3 hospitals in Lom&#233;, namely the Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sylvanus Olympio), the Campus University Teaching Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Campus) and the Hospital of B&#232; (H&#244;pital de B&#232;) in Lom&#233;. It was a prospective cross-sectional study with a descriptive aim which took place over a period of 3 months between October and December 2020. This study included non-ophthalmological health practitioners regardless of the position held. After the validity and the reliability of questionnaire from a small group of practitioners, a total of 250 survey forms which was the questionnaire of 42 questions were sent after survey and consent to agents of 3 departments namely the medicine, surgery, gyneco-ostetrics and pediatrics departments of the 3 health centers. Finally, 169 forms were completed and collected. To define a good knowledge of glaucoma we considered questions in relation with the knowledge of glaucoma which corresponded on the questionnaire all the questions from number 17 to number 36i.e. 20 questions. We defined the score of knowledge bad if only 0 - 9 questions are correctly answered, medium if 10 - 14 are correctly answered and good if 15 - 20 questions are correctly answered. Three parameters were evaluated namely knowledge about glaucoma, attitudes about and practice about glaucoma. Data were entered and processed using Epidata software version 3.1.</p><p>The main difficulty encountered in this study is the unavailability of certain healthcare practitioners because of the pandemic of coronavirus disease.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Sample</title><p>A total of 196 agents out of 250 contacted responded to the questionnaire,i.e. a participation rate of 67.6%. Compared to the center, there were 72 respondents for Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital, 42 for Campus University Teaching Hospital and 55 for B&#232; Hospital,i.e. respectively 42.60%, 24.90% and 32.50%. Regarding the distribution by sex, there were 86 men and 83 women which represented respectively 50.90% and 49.10%, or a sex ratio of 1.04. The average age was 33.66 &#177; 10.45 years. The distribution of respondents according to age group is summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Regarding the qualification of agents, 46.10% were doctors and 53.90% paramedical practitioners. The distribution of the subjects surveyed in relation to their qualification is summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Regarding seniority in the profession, 58.60% had at most 5 years of experience</p><p>against 41.40% who had more than 5 years of experience.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. General Knowledge and Awareness about Glaucoma</title><p>&#183; About the definition of glaucoma, 21.30% of the practitioners defined glaucoma as an eye disease while 53.80% defined it as a high intraocular pressure and 17.20% as an optic nerve disease. At the end, 3.60% defined it as an inflammation or infection of eye and 4.10% didn’t know any definition of glaucoma.</p><p>&#183; With regard to glaucoma awareness, 98.20% said they had been sensitized about glaucoma versus 1.80% who had never been sensitized about glaucoma.</p><p>&#183; About the question if they did know the different types of glaucoma, 39.10% cited primary open angle glaucoma, 37.90% cited the angle closure glaucoma, 7.70% cited congenital glaucoma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Questions about who glaucoma affect, its risk factors, its clinical signs and prognostic and questions about congenital glaucoma also were concerned by the questionnaire. Practitioners’ opinions are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Compared to the level of overall knowledge about glaucoma according to our study, 51.5% have good knowledge while 48.5% have poor knowledge of glaucomatous disease.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Attitudes and Practices on Glaucoma</title><p>&#183; When asked what to do in case of glaucoma, 60.90% answered that they must consult a doctor and 39.10% said they must scrupulously respect the follow-up appointments for the treatment. None of them mentioned that the must pray, or refer to traditional medical practitioner or abandon their glaucoma treatment. Concerning attitudes more precisely the treatment in case of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Types of glaucomas</title></caption><table>
<tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types of glaucomas</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adult glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POAG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angle closure glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.90%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal tension glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ischemic glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Concepts on glaucoma</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concepts on glaucoma</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Don’t know</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >It affects only adults</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma leads to vision loss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Probability high with HBP and diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Observing the sun directly without a sunglasses can lead to glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is manifested by eye scratching and eyelid swelling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eye pain, gradual loss of visual acuity and tearing suggests chronic glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma-related blindness is curable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Probability of having glaucoma increases with age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Black people are more likely to have glaucoma than white</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Triad “Big beautiful eyes, photophobia and tearing” in newborns is reminiscent of congenital glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Attitudes and practices about glaucoma</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma can be treated with surgery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >80</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >55</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >34</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is treated by instillation of eye drops for life</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is also treated par LASER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In case of congenital glaucoma wait until 5 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In case of congenital glaucoma parents must be reassured that it will be okay when he grows up</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In case of congenital glaucoma, refer to ophthalmologist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>glaucoma, the practitioners said that a medical treatment, surgical treatment and physical treatment exist (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). About the frequency of appointments during the following up, some practitionners thought about one appointment every 6 months, those said only one checking up a year and the last group said occasional appointment.</p><p>&#183; Finally some correlations had been established among people in different level of scolarisation and knowledge about glaucoma firstly and secondly among people in different qualification and knowledge about glaucoma. It appears that the correlation between knowledge of glaucoma and school level is significant with a chi-square test = 4.702; p = 0.03 (p &lt; 0.05) but the correlation between knowledge of congenital glaucoma and school level is not significant (chi<sup>2</sup> test = 1.27; p = 0.25 (p &gt; 0.05); the correlation between the school level and the level of awareness is significant (p &lt; 0.05) and the correlation between knowledge of congenital glaucoma and the service of practitioner is not significant (chi<sup>2</sup> = 3.40 with a p &gt; 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Population and Type of Study</title><p>The multicentric character of our study is comparable to that carried out by Monsudi et al. in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>], Ichhpujani et al. in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref10">10</xref>] and Khawaja et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref11">11</xref>] in Pakistan with the targeting of health care practitioner. Compared to the socio-demographic nature of our sample, we had a young population with an average age of 33.66 &#177; 10.45 years. These results are similar to those of Monsudi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>], Khawaja et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref11">11</xref>] who in their studies found an average age of 36 years and 32.42 years respectively. This similarity could be explained by the age pyramid. It corresponds in fact to the most active and important average age on the labor market in our developing countries. We noted a slight male predominance in our study with a sex ratio of 1.04 (86H/83F). Similar results were found by Monsudi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>] in Nigeria and Khawaja et al. in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref11">11</xref>] with a sex ratio of 1.3 and 1.7, respectively. On the other hand, a female predominance was found by Ichhpujani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref10">10</xref>] in India with a sex ratio of 0.4.</p><p>According to the data in the medical literature, there would be a male predominance among the nursing staff [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref12">12</xref>], which thus corroborates with our results.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Knowledge and Awareness of Glaucoma</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Awareness of Glaucoma</title><p>In our study 98.2% had once heard of glaucoma while Komolafe et al. had reported 100% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref13">13</xref>] in Nigeria, Ichhpujani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref10">10</xref>] in India in their work. A lower proportion of 76.1% and 63.3% respectively were found by Monsudi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>] and Osaguona et al. in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref14">14</xref>]. In general, the level of awareness remains high compared to the various studies in several developing countries leaded by Balo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>]; Ogbonnaya et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref15">15</xref>] who found 29% and 21.1% respectively. The high level of awareness among clinical staff in these studies is not surprising, as they are expected to have had glaucoma lectures during their training.</p><p>The majority of information on glaucoma was collected during their training among 70.7% of the practititoners. The same conclusion was made by Osaguona et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref14">14</xref>] Ichhpujani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref10">10</xref>], Onabolu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref16">16</xref>] in their different studies. On the other hand, Monsudi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>] noted that the hospital seminars were the most important source of information which is quite understandable given the quarterly postgraduate presentations made by ophthalmology department in this hospital. The low proportion of the mass media could be explained by the lack of programs produced by health professionals to raise public awareness.</p><p>Awareness through friendships in our study was low like that of Askira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref17">17</xref>], Monsudi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>]; this may be due to reluctance to disclose a health problem among friends or that eye health staff do not inform patients about their situation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Knowledge about Chronic Glaucoma</title><p>In our study, more than half of the practitioners,i.e. 51.5%, had a good level of knowledge about chronic glaucoma. These results are in the same direction as those found by Osaguona et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref14">14</xref>], Khawaja et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref11">11</xref>] who found respectively 62.5% and 91% of good level of knowledge about glaucoma. On the other hand, our results are contrary to those found by Onabolu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref16">16</xref>] who found in their study that less than half of their sample,i.e. 42.5%, had a good level of knowledge about glaucoma. In addition, we noted a very significant correlation between the level of knowledge and the level of education on the one hand and between the level of knowledge and the qualification on the other hand, as in certain studies of the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref18">18</xref>]. In terms of heredity and age factors, participants knew that heredity (69.2% of the sample) and age (59.7%) are important risk factors for glaucoma. However, other authors have reported eye trauma and intraocular infection as the major risk factors for glaucoma according to their studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>]. Of the consequences on the optic nerve, 17.2% said glaucoma is a disease that damages the optic nerve due to increased pressure in the eye. Some authors found a higher result of 27.5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref10">10</xref>], while others reported 39.2% in their study. Most of the participants, 92.3%, said that untreated glaucoma could lead to blindness. This strong finding has also been made but to a lesser extent in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref16">16</xref>]. About the different types of glaucoma treatment, according to our results, 33.7% of participants were aware of laser treatment. This finding has been noted but to a lesser extent by other authors in their work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref9">9</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Knowledge of Congenital Glaucoma</title><p>With regard to congenital glaucoma, a smaller proportion,i.e. 22.5% of practitioners, were aware of this type of glaucoma, a type of glaucoma, moreover, quite rarer according to data in the literature.</p><p>Photophobia, tearing and large eyes were recognized by 46.2% as signs of congenital glaucoma. These results are similar to those found by Marco et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref19">19</xref>] Michel et al. in Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref20">20</xref>]. In all cases, awareness of the symptoms of congenital glaucoma compared to glaucoma in adults remains low and this could be attributed to the relative rarity of this pathology.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Attitude and Practice about Glaucoma</title><p>According to our study, when diagnosed with glaucoma, 60.90% responded that they needed to see a doctor. This figure is even increased to 91.7% of the population who would seek help from an ophthalmologist in the event of complications. Balo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] on the other hand in a previous study found that only 43.9% will have recourse to an ophthalmologist. This opposition of attitudes is linked to the difference in the level of education on the one hand and on the other hand, the study by Balo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] being carried out in the semi-urban population and ours among the nursing staff. Regarding the respect of appointments, 39.1% of the population had reported the scrupulous respect of appointments for follow-up treatment. This good attitude would probably be linked to the knowledge of certain basics by the nursing staff with regard to the follow-up of the treatment. On the practice regarding glaucoma for follow-up, participants 81.1% of the staff saw fit to follow up once every 6 months. The gradual application of good practices by healthcare staff would explain these results.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitation of the Study</title><p>In the selection procedure, we were unable to interview the nursing staff to see whether or not the agents had to resort to their specialist colleagues to complete the forms, which would be a methodological bias. In addition, it was not possible to identify among the staff those already followed in ophthalmology for glaucoma who would probably be better informed about the disease than their other colleagues. In any case, other studies will be carried out to eliminate these biases with a view to new results.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>In our study the level of awareness is generally good about glaucoma. Most of the information on glaucoma was collected during their training; however the level of knowledge is low especially with regard to congenital glaucoma. There was a significant correlation between knowledge about glaucoma and level of education. The lower the level of study, the less knowledge is good.</p><p>This study reveals the need to program awareness campaigns targeting health personnel and then the population by making greater use of the mass media in order to step up the fight against glaucoma. A study subsequent to the previous actions will make it possible to see the level of practical knowledge and skills of the community regarding glaucoma and it would be a great asset in the fight against glaucoma.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Amedome, M.K., Mensah, Y.A.P., Vonor, K., Maneh, N., Dzidzinyo, K., Saa, K.B.N., Ayena, K.D. and Balo, K. (2021) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health Care Staff about Glaucoma in Lom&#233;. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 11, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.112013</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Questionnaire: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health Personnel on Glaucoma in Lom&#233;</title>I. General Informations<p>N˚ Center /__ / Date /__/__/ /__ /__/ /__/__ /</p><p>N˚ Folder: /__ / __ / __ / __ /</p><p>Civil status:</p><p>Q1 Age: /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] 18 - 29 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] 30 - 39 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] 40 - 49 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] 50 - 59 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] 60 and more</p><p>Q2 Sex: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] male, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] female</p><p>Q3 Marital status: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] married, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] widower, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] divorced, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] single</p><p>Q4 Religion: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Christianity, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] Islam, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] animism, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] none, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] others</p><p>Q5 Scolarisation: / __ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] illiterate, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] primary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] secondary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] university</p><p>Q6 Profession /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Nurse assistant, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] midwife assistant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] nurse, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] doctor assistant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] midwife, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] general practitioner, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref7">7</xref>] specialist doctor …………specify……… ……………………………………</p><p>Q7 Hospital: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Sylvanus Olympio University teaching hospital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] Campus University teaching hospital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] B&#232; Hospital</p><p>Q8 Service: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] General Medecine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] Gynecology-Obstetric [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Pediatrics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] Surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] Stomatology -ENT</p><p>Q9 Year of seniority in the position /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] &lt;1 year; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] 1 - 5 years; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] 6 - 10 years; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] 10 - 15 years, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] 16 years and more (Specify……years)</p>II. Background<p>Q10 Do you have a parent with a chronic eye condition? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q11 If Yes, specify /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] cataract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] glaucoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] refractive error (myopia/ presbyopia/hypermetropia /…)</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] others………………………………………………………….</p><p>Q12 Do you suffer from an eye disease? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q13 If Yes, specify /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] cataract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] glaucoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] refractive error (myopia/presbyopia/hypermetropia/…) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] others………………………………………………………….</p>III. Knowledge and Awareness about Glaucoma<sec id="s10_0_1"><title>3.1. Awareness</title><p>Q14 Have you ever heard of glaucoma? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No</p><p>Q15 If yes, where? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] during my training [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] at the hospital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] in the mass media (tv, radio, internet...) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] by friends [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] others ……………………………………</p><p>Q16 Do you know the name glaucoma in your area: /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] I don’t know [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] I know: give it……..</p></sec><sec id="s10_0_2"><title>3.2. Knowledge about Chronic Glaucoma</title><p>Q17 What is glaucoma? /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] it is an eye disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] it is a high intraocular pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] it is a disease of the nerve in the eye [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] it is inflammation or infection of the eye [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] don’t know [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] Other ……..</p><p>Q18 Do you know the different types of glaucoma? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No</p><p>Q19 if yes, name two types ……………………………………………………………………………………………</p><p>Q20 The probability of having glaucoma is high if a family member has it /__/ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q21 Glaucoma only affects adults over 40 /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q22 Glaucoma causes vision loss /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q23 Does the probability of having glaucoma increase with the existence of high blood pressure and/or diabetes? /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q24 Observing the sun directly without a sunglasses can lead to glaucoma /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q25 Glaucoma is manifested by eye scratching and eyelid swelling /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q26 Eye pain, gradual loss of visual acuity and tearing suggests chronic glaucoma /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q27 Glaucoma-related blindness is curable /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q28 The probability of having glaucoma increases with age /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q29 Black people are more likely to have glaucoma than white /__/ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q30 Glaucoma can be treated with surgery /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q31 Glaucoma is treated by instillation of eye drops for life /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q32 Glaucoma can also be treated with a laser /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p></sec><sec id="s10_0_3"><title>3.3. Knowledge about Congenital Glaucoma</title><p>Q33 Big beautiful eyes, photophobia and tearing in newborns are reminiscent of congenital glaucoma /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q34 In case of congenital glaucoma in a newborn baby, you have to wait until the child is 5 years old /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q35 In case of congenital glaucoma in a newborn baby, parents must be reassured that it will be okay when he grows up /__ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q36 In case of congenital glaucoma in a newborn baby, he must be referred quickly to an ophthalmologist for surgery / __ / [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p>IV. Attitudes in Case of Glaucoma<p>Q37 Which health care provider are you followed for screening for eye complications of glaucoma /__/</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] General practitioner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] Ophthalmologist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Nurse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] Ophthalmologist assistant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] others (specify).</p><p>Q38 Regular intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is necessary even in the absence of eye symptoms /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Yes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] No [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] Don’t know</p><p>Q39 What would you do if you were diagnosed with glaucoma? /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] consult my attending physician [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] resort to traditional medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] abandon all treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] pray [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref5">5</xref>] scrupulously respect my follow-up appointments for my treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref6">6</xref>] others (specify)</p>V. Practice on Glaucoma<p>Q40 How often is a check-up necessary for monitoring glaucoma?</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] once every 6 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] once a year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] occasionally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] other (specify) / __ /</p><p>Q41 What are your motivations for having the fundus exam regularly /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Fear of losing their sight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] recommendation of the attending physician [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] availability of financial means or insurance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] other (specify)</p><p>Q42 What are the barriers to completing the regular IOP exam? /__ /</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref1">1</xref>] Not informed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref2">2</xref>] does not consider it necessary in the absence of visual disturbances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref3">3</xref>] lack of financial means [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109538-ref4">4</xref>] others (specify).</p><p>Thank You</p></sec></sec> 

</body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.109538-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quigley, H.A. and Broman, A.T. (2006) The Number of People with Glaucoma Worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 90, 262-267.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foster, P.J., Buhrmann, R., Quigley, H.A. and Johnson, G.J. (2002) The Definition and Classification of Glaucoma in Prevalence Surveys. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86, 238-342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.2.238</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bron, A. and Francoz, A. (2014) Le GPAO dans le monde. In: Renard, J.-P. and Sellem, E., Eds., Rapport de la SFO, Elsevier Masson, Paris, 13-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Resnikoff, S., Pascolini, D., Etya’ale, D., et al. (2004) Global Data on Visual Impairment in the Year 2002. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 1559-1564.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quigley, H.A. and Vitale, S.S. (1997) Model of Open Angle Glaucoma Prevalence and Incidence in the United States. Investigative Ophthalmology &amp; Visual Science, 38, 83-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balo, P.K., Serouis, G.A., Banla, M., Agla, K., Djagnikpo, P.A. and Koffi-Gué, K.B. (2004) Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques relatives au glaucome dans la population urbaine et semi-urbaine de Lomé. Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/ santé, 14, 187-191.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tenkir, A., Solomon, B. and Deribew, A. (2010) Glaucoma Awareness among People Attending Ophthalmic Outreach Services in Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol, 10, Article No. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-10-17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saw, S.M., Gazzard, G., Friedman, D., Foster, P.J., Devereux, J.G., Wong, M.L. and Seah, S. (2003) Awareness of Glaucoma, and Health Beliefs of Patients Suffering Primary Acute Angle Closure. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 87, 446-449.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monsudi, K.F., Saka, E.S. and Ayodapo, A.O. (2018) Health Workers Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma in Tertiary Hospital in Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal , 8, 1-8,https://doi.org/10.9734/OR/2018/39379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ichhpujani, P., Bhartiya, S., Kataria, M. and Topiwala, P. (2012) Knowledge, Attitudes and Self-Care Practices Associated with Glaucoma among Hospital Personnel in a Tertiary Care Center in North India. Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice, 6, 108-112. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khawaja, A.H.S.H, Hashim, I. and Haider, A. (2017) Awareness and Knowledge about Cataract and Glaucoma among Non-Ophthalmology Healthcare Professionals Working in Different Cadres at Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Mirpur, Azad Kashmir. Journal of University Medical &amp; Dental College, 8, 56-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eriki, P., Oyo-Ita, A., Odedo, R., Udoh, A., Omaswa, F. and Kadama, P. (2015) Surgical Workforce in Nigeria: Stock and Flow of Medical and Dental Practitionners in Nigeria, with Special Focus on Health Workforce Training in Cross River State. https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/031616NigeriaCaseStudyweb.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Komolafe, O.O., Omolase, C.O., Bekibele, C.O., Ogunleye, O.A., Komolafe, O.A. and Omotayo, F.O. (2013) Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma among Workers in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Care Institution. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 20, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.110609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osaguona, V.B. and Edema, O.T. (2014) Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma among Hospital Workers at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. Sahel Medical Journal, 17, 132-135. https://doi.org/10.4103/1118-8561.146816</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogbonnaya, C.E., Ogbonnaya, L.U., Okoye, O. and Kizor-Akaraiwe, N. (2016) Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge, and Attitude to Screening, in a Rural Community in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 6, 119-127.https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2016.62017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onabolu, O.O. and Bodunde, O.T. (2014) Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma among Primary Care Givers in a Developing Country. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 7, 5-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Askira, B.H., Waziri, M.A., Musa, Z.Y., Ribadu, D.Y. and Kyari, F.A. (2015) Glaucoma Awareness among Tertiary Health Care Workers in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Borno Medical Journal, 12, 30-35.http://www.bornomedicaljournal.com/pdfs/36_BOMJ_Vol12_No1_BOMJvol12issue1.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntim-Amponsah, C.T., Winifred, M.K.A. and Ofusu-Amaah, S. (2004) Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma and Other Diseases Associated with Blindness in a Ghanaian Community. Nigerian Journal of Ophthalmology, 12, 50-54.https://doi.org/10.4314/njo.v12i2.11947</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wanyama, S.P., Marco, S. and Kariuki, M. (2015) Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Eye Diseases in Children among Paediatricians in Kenya. The Journal of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, 19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109538-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michel, B., Mary, Z.S. and Italo, M. (2003) What Do Pediatricians Know about Children’s Eye Diseases? Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 66, 489-492.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>