Unlike monogastric, the forestomach in the ruminants is divided into four compartments, i.e. rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasum or true stomach or glandular stomach [1]. The Ruminants forestomach allows colonization of countless numbers of microbes [2], which are collectively called the rumen microbiome [3]. Out of these groups, bacteria and protozoa predominate the microbial biomass [4]. The rumen microbiome plays an essential role in ruminant physiology, nutrition and pathology as well as host immunity [5]. Rumen microorganisms are able to modulate nutrient absorption and may be among the major determinants of nutrient utilization efficiency and detoxifying plant secondary compounds [6] [7]. However, they are also responsible for methane production [8]. Diet composition and dry matter intake are responsible for altering the rumen microbiome composition [9]. Rumen is one of the most underutilized microbial ecosystems that produce an array of enzymes for digestion and utilization of different plant constituents [4], e.g. Lignocellulolytic enzymes from synergistic relationship of rumen microbiome extract energy from the fiber feed and support digestion of the host. This yields volatile fatty acids (VFAs, acetate, butyrate, propionate), formic acid, H₂, CO₂, and CH₄ [10].

The major obstacles hindering our understanding of the structure and function of the rumen microbiome are that only approximately 15% of rumen bacteria appear to be culturable [11], which highlights the importance of molecular biology approaches to sidestep this limitation and study the rumen system in total [12].

Recent developments in the study of gut microbial communities (microbiomes) through genomics and metagenomics are revolutionizing our understanding of the functions of the ecosystem and the interactions among their members and the host animal [8]. Metagenomics is a fast growing and diverse field within environmental biology directed at obtaining knowledge on genomes of environmental microbes, without prior cultivation, as well as of entire microbial communities. Other terms are also used to describe this: environmental genomics, eco-genomics, community genomics, and mega-genomics [13].

Two approaches have been commonly used for exploring the rich genetic resource provided by rumen microbiome: high throughput screening of cloned expression libraries made from rumen metagenome DNA for gene products of interest (functional metagenomics) and sequencing based characterization of the aggregate collection of genomes and genes present in rumen microbial communities, at both DNA (metagenomics) and RNA levels (meta-transcript omics) [5].

The term “functional metagenomics”, in a broad sense, is meant to reflect a connection between the identity of a microbe, or a community, uncovered via metagenomics and their respective function(s) in the environment [13]. By combining different approaches, investigation at a functional level (e.g. cellulose degradation, hydrogen metabolism) rather than a phylogenetic one is more pragmatic approach to uncover new protein [8] [14]. That helps to better assign function, role and significance to differences in microbial community structure.

Functional screening technology was first applied to rumen materials to mine novel enzymes in 2005 [15]. Despite the accumulated body of information, there is still an incomplete understanding of the functioning and ecology of the rumen microbiome and its behavior from yet to be culture microbes. For instance, the complete mechanism of plant polysaccharide degradation, the quintessential rumen function, is not yet elucidated [16]. So, this manuscript is intended to highlight functional metagenomics approach from the rumen environment.

The rumen harbor very complex consortium of bacteria, protozoa, archaea, fungi and bacteriophages, where the interaction among them results in better feed degradation [17]. According to Woese’s classification all microbes in the rumen ecosystem can be distinguished into three domains: Bacteria (bacteria), Archaea (methanogens), and Eucarya (protozoa and fungi) [18]. Table 1 illustrates the physical, chemical, and microbiological characteristics of rumen ecosystem.

The metagenomics for different enzyme discovery involves creating of a metagenomics library from rumen sample and screening the library clones for specific enzymes [27]. Early studies on rumen microorganisms depended on retrieval of genes from libraries of genomic DNA via functional screening or, lately, via PCR amplification of genes and their homologs [28]. Procedurally, clone library construction involves obtaining a DNA or RNA extract from a mixed microbial community of interest, such as rumen sample. Ribosomal RNA Gene is then amplified using PCR or RT-PCR. Amplicons are purified and inserted into a vector such as plasmid containing antibiotic resistance genes [29]. Expression library then screened for a target reaction with a specific substrate [30] [31]. The clone in the expression vectors followed by activity-based screening has endless possibilities of unlocking concealed potential in uncultured microbial world [32].

There are two distinct strategies taken in metagenomics, according to the primary goal. First, large insert libraries (cosmid, fosmid, or bacterial artificial chromosomes (pBACs)) are constructed for archiving and sequence homology screening purposes: to capture the largest amount of the available genetic resources available in the sample and archive it for further studies/interrogation. Second, small insert expression libraries, especially those made in lambda phage vectors, are constructed for activity screening [14].

The DNA extraction procedure and size sorting using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis is a critical step when constructing large-insert libraries (e.g., fosmid, cosmid) and small insert expression libraries (e.g., those in lambda phage and plasmid vectors) [14]. The choice of a vector depends largely on the length of the inserts. Plasmids are suitable for cloning smaller than 10-kb DNA fragments, and cosmids (25 - 35 kb), fosmids (25 - 40 kb), or BACs (100 - 200 kb) can be used to clone larger fragments [33]. Among these vectors, plasmids have high copy numbers and strong vector-borne promoters. Nevertheless, these apparent merits do not improve the hit rate significantly [33]. Cosmid or fosmid based libraries are often preferred due to their large and consistent insert size and high cloning efficiency [27].

For the construction of a library, most researchers use E .coli as a surrogate host [33]. In most such cases, the host for the cloned DNA has been the workhorse of the molecular geneticist [34]. Various types of E. coli strains are available as highly efficient competent cells from commercial sources.

However, most function-based approaches for metagenomic screening are hindered by the biased and insufficient expression in E. coli due to transcription-translation machinery of E. coli is not compatible with the expression of genes harvested from environmental microbes. This can result in a very low proportion of positive clones being obtained from one round of screening of metagenomic libraries (in some cases less than 0.01%) [35]. There is an urgent need to develop a greater range of alternative hosts with good expression of foreign genes of metagenomic origins [36]. Furthermore, technical challenge in library construction such as insufficient amount and length of the extracted DNA Parks and Graham [37], inefficient transcription of target genes as well as improper assembly of the corresponding enzymes [38] and DNA shearing [39].

Development of new host systems using microbes, namely, Streptomyces spp., thermus ther-mophilus, Sulfolobus solfataricus and Proteobacteria [40] [41] [42] [43], have widened the choice of host and compatible enzyme assay systems. E. coli, owing to its ease of transformation and being the best genetically characterized bacterium, has been the choice host for heterologous gene expression in metagenomic studies [32].

Functional screening has become an increasingly important field for discovering novel biomolecules for applications in biotechnology and medicine [5]. Most activity screenings of metagenomics libraries are based on the cultivation of metagenomics clones on indicator plates allowing analysis of defined enzyme activities via bio catalytic conversion of an indicator substrate that leads to the formation of a clear or colored halo surrounding the “positive” colony [44]. Several parameters are important for successful screening of metagenomics libraries, such as the abundance of the gene in the library, the average insert size, the host-vector system, the use of an adequate host organism that is able to express the target gene, the assay method, the efficiency of heterologous gene expression in a surrogate host and the throughput of screening methods is relatively low [5] [33] [45]. Table 4, illustrate recent examples of functional screening strategies employed to obtain metagenome-derived biocatalysts.

With synchronized advances in the HTS (high throughput screening) methods and the choice of transformation systems with wide available range of hosts for heterologous gene expression, it is now possible to screen up to 50,000 clones per second or over one billion clones per day [46]. Functional screening technology was first applied to rumen materials to mine novel enzymes in 2005 [15].

Note: AZCL, azurine-cross-linked; GMD, gel micro-droplet; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; ARS, agriculture research service. GMD: the microfluidic gel microdroplets. Source: [36].

Rumen associated functionally screened microbiome product and application of highly active enzymes for commercial applications will provide a new dimension in agroindustry’s and also decreasing the methane release into atmosphere [28] [62]. Rumen microorganisms produce a series of enzymes known as carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) that can break down plant cell walls. There are four types of CAZymes that are distinguished based on protein sequence, gene sequence, and structural similarities: glycoside hydrolases (GHs), glycosyltransferases (GTs), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), and carbohydrate esterases (CEs); these CAZymes cooperatively contribute to dietary cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin deconstruction [63] [64]. Some of the CAZy family such as GH3 (b-glucosidase), CE6 (esterase) from cow and GH (Cellodextrinase) from Buffalo were obtained using functional metagenomics approach [65] [66] [67]. Some of the Author that characterize CAZymes includes Hess et al., [68], identified 27,755 putative cow rumen carbohydrate active genes and expressed 90 candidate proteins, of which (51) 57% were enzymatically active against cellulosic substrates. Cheng et al., [69] functionally screened high temperature resistant and pH tolerance industrial relevance novel esterase and xylanases from cow rumen metagenomics. Zhao et al., [70], screened substrate specific and good thermal stable three lipases derived from dairy rumen microflora. Pope et al., [71] also identified laccase from reindeer rumen by metagenomic approaches which able to degrade lignin. Wichmann et al., [72], identified 80 unique antibiotic enzymes together with a novel clade of chloramphenicol acetyl-transferases from cow manure. Thirabunyanon et al., [73], found a novel probiotics strain of Bacillu subtilis having inhibitory activity against Salmonella enteritidis infection. Some of identified enzymes together with screening method from various reports are given in Table 5.

Advances in functional metagenomics have paved industry with an unprecedented chance to bring biomolecules of metagenomic origin into a commercial success. There are a number of companies involved commercialization of metagenomic research such as Diversa Corp, BASF, DSM, Syngenta, Genencor International, and BRAIN AG have commercialized many biological molecules of commercial interest Table 6 [74].

Source: [4].

N.D. no details available or products still under development. Source: [74].

Currently, the major laboratories working in the area of rumen metagenomics include DOE Joint Genome Institute-Genome Technology, USA; USDA, USA; INRA, France; CSIRO, Australia; and AgResearch, New Zealand, and Agricultural University India [4].

Functional metagenomics screening technology is the powerful tool of future research arena with a potential of mining environmentally as well as commercially important biocatalyst. Rumen sample collection, DNA library construction and screening of the clone are the standard procedure for rumen functional metagenomics work. Screening technology ranges from the old technique such as Agar plate to high throughput advanced technology such as mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and colorimetric assay. The four rumen environment origin enzymes (CAZymes) have a significant contribution to agro industry and pharmaceutical Company.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Bekele, W., Zegeye, A., Simachew, A., & Assefa, G. (2021) Functional Metagenomics from the Rumen Environment—A Review. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 12, 125-141. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2021.125009