<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2021.127059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-109311</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Explanation for the Violation of Lepton Universality in Beauty-Quark Decays: The Binary Isotope Mixture of Beauty-Quarks
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ding-Yu</surname><given-names>Chung</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Utica, Michigan, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>971</fpage><lpage>982</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper purposes an explanation for the recent evidence for the violation of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. A beauty meson (B
  <sup>+</sup>) transforms into a strange meson (K
  <sup>+</sup>) with the emission of either electron-positron (e
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>-</sup>) or muon-antimuon (
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>-</sup>). The ratio (
  <em>R</em>
  <sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B
  <sup>+ </sup>
  → K
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>- </sup>and B
  <sup>+</sup>
  → K
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>-</sup> decays is measured to be 
  <em>R</em>
  <sub>K</sub> = 0.846 instead of 1 in the violation of lepton universality in the Standard Model. This paper proposes that the violation is derived from the binary isotope mixture of two beauty-quarks, b
  <sub>7</sub> (4979 MeV mass) and b
  <sub>8</sub> (143,258 MeV mass) whose masses are calculated from the periodic table of elementary particles. b
  <sub>7</sub> is the observable B, while b
  <sub>8</sub> is the hidden B to preserve the generation number symmetry between the three lepton family generations and the three quark family generations in the Standard Model. The preservation of the generation number symmetry forbids b
  <sub>8</sub> to decay into K
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>-</sup>. In the transition state involving the virtual particles (
  <em>γ</em>, W&#177; and Z
  &#176;) before the decay, b
  <sub>7</sub> and b
  <sub>8</sub> emerge to form the binary isotope mixture from B. The rates of emergence as the rates of diffuse in Graham’s law of diffusion are proportional to inverse square root of mass. The rate ratio between b
  <sub>8</sub>/b
  <sub>7</sub> is (4979/143,258)
  <sup>1/2</sup> = 0.1864. Since b
  <sub>7</sub> decays into K
  <sup>+</sup>, e
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>-</sup>, and 
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>-</sup>, while b
  <sub>8</sub> decays into K
  <sup>+</sup>, e
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>-</sup>, and forbidden 
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>-</sup>, the calculated ratio (RK) of branching fractions for B
  <sup>+</sup>
  → K
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>+</sup>
  <em>μ</em>
  <sup>-</sup> and B
  <sup>+</sup>
  → K
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>+</sup>e
  <sup>- </sup>is 0.5/(0.1864 &#215; 0.5+ 0.5) = 0.843 in excellent agreement with the observed 0.846. The agreement between the calculated RK and the observed RK confirms the validity of the periodic table of elementary particles which provides the answers for the dominance of matter over antimatter, dark-matter, and the mass hierarchy of elementary particles.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Beauty-Quark Decays</kwd><kwd> Violation of Lepton Universality</kwd><kwd> Periodic Table of Elementary Particles</kwd><kwd> Binary Isotope Mixture of Beauty-Quarks</kwd><kwd> Ratio of Branching Fractions</kwd><kwd> Dark Matter</kwd><kwd> Dominance of Matter over Antimatter</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>For about sixty years, the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has provided the model for various properties and interactions of fundamental particles, and has been confirmed by numerous experiments. In lepton universality of the SM, the different charged leptons, the electron, muon and tau, have identical electroweak interaction strengths. Lepton universality has been confirmed in a wide range of particle decays. A recent measurement of beauty-quark decays based on proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider shows the evidence for the breaking of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref1">1</xref>]. A beauty meson (B<sup>+</sup>) transforms into a strange meson (K<sup>+</sup>) with the emission of leptons (ℓ<sup>+</sup>ℓ<sup>−</sup>) which is either electron-positron (e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>) or muon-antimuon (&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>). Lepton universality of the SM predicts that the ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> decays is 1. The observed R<sub>K</sub> is 0.846 instead of 1 in the violation of lepton universality in the SM. The measurement has a significance of 3.1 standard deviations.</p><p>If confirmed by future measurements, this violation of lepton universality would imply new physics beyond the Standard Model. Since the SM is unable to explain cosmological observations of the dominance of matter over antimatter, dark-matter, or the mass hierarchy of elementary particles, the new physics derived from the violation of lepton universality can explain the SM’s shortcomings. In the previous papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>], the SM’s shortcoming to account for the mass hierarchy of elementary particles is solved by the periodic table of elementary particles where the masses of all leptons, quarks, gauge bosons, the Higgs boson, and hadrons can be calculated precisely, and the calculated masses are in excellent agreement with the observed masses. As shown in this paper, the new physics from the violation of lepton universality actually confirms the validity of the periodic table of elementary particles.</p><p>This paper proposes that the violation is derived from the binary isotope mixture of two beauty-quarks, b<sub>7</sub> (4979 MeV mass) and b<sub>8</sub> (143,258 MeV mass) whose masses are calculated from the periodic table of elementary particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref7">7</xref>]. b<sub>7</sub> is the observable B, while b<sub>8</sub> is the hidden B to preserve the generation number symmetry between the three lepton family generations and the three quark family generations in the SM. The preservation of the generation number symmetry forbids b<sub>8</sub> to decay into K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>. In the transition state involving the virtual particles (γ, W&#177; and Z˚) before the decay, b<sub>7</sub> and b<sub>8</sub> emerge to form the binary isotope mixture from B. The rates of emergence as the rates of diffuse in Graham’s law of diffusion are proportional to inverse square root of mass. The rate ratio between b<sub>8</sub>/b<sub>7</sub> is (4979/143,258)<sup>1/2</sup> = 0.1864. Since b<sub>7</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, while b<sub>8</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and forbidden &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, the calculated ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> is 0.5/(0.1864 &#215; 0.5+ 0.5) = 0.843 in excellent agreement with the observed 0.846. The agreement between the calculated R<sub>K</sub> and the observed R<sub>K</sub> confirms the validity of the periodic table of elementary particles.</p><p>Section 2 describes the periodic table of elementary particles and the calculation of the masses of leptons and quarks including the masses of b<sub>7</sub> and b<sub>8</sub>. Section 3 describes the beauty-quark decay and the calculation of R<sub>K</sub> for the branching fractions of B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>. Section 4 explains dark matter and the dominance of matter over antimatter.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Periodic <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>of Elementary Particles</title><p>The periodic table of elementary particles for baryonic matter and dark matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>] is based on the seven principal mass dimensions (d’s) for stable baryonic matter leptons (electron and neutrinos), gauge bosons (all forces), gravity, and dark matter (five sterile dark matter neutrinos) and the seven auxiliary mass dimensions (a’s) for unstable leptons (muon and tau) and quarks (d, u, s, c, b, and t) as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</label><caption><title> The periodic table of elementary particles for baryonic matter and dark matter</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >d</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a = 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a = 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a = 0</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stable Baryonic Matter Leptons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dark Matter Leptons</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Unstable Leptons</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Quarks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bosons</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>e</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>DM5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>5</sub> = A electromagnetism</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>DM6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>6</sub> = g* strong (basic gluon for quarks)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>μ</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>DM7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >μ<sub>7 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >τ<sub>7 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>7</sub>/u<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >s<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >c<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >t<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>7</sub> = Z L 0 left-handed BM weak</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>τ</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>DM8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >μ<sub>8</sub> (absent)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b<sub>8</sub> (absent)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >t<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>8</sub> = Z R 0 right-handed DM weak</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν‘<sub>τ</sub> (high-mass ν<sub>τ</sub> )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ν<sub>DM9</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>9</sub> = dark matter repulsive force</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>10</sub> = particle-antiparticle asymmetry</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravitino</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>11</sub> = gravity</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>d = principal mass dimension number, a = auxiliary mass dimension number, DM = dark matter, BM = baryonic matter.</p><p>The periodic table of elementary particles provides the answers for the dominance of matter over antimatter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>], dark-matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref5">5</xref>], and the mass hierarchy of elementary particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>]. The masses of all leptons, quarks, gauge bosons, the Higgs boson, gravity, and dark matter can be calculated by the periodic table of elementary particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>]. Since this paper deals with mostly beauty quark, only the masses of leptons and quarks are calculated.</p><p>The mass of mass dimensional fermion and the mass of mass dimensional boson are related to each other with three simple formulas as the follows.</p><p>M d , B = M d,F / α d (1)</p><p>M d + 1,F = M d,B / α d + 1 (2)</p><p>M d + 1,B = M d , B / α d + 1 2 , (3)</p><p>where d is the mass dimension number, F is fermion, and B is boson. Each dimension has its own α<sub>d</sub>, and all α<sub>d</sub>’s except α<sub>7</sub> (α<sub>w</sub>) of the seventh dimension (weak interaction) are equal to α, the fine structure constant of electromagnetism.</p><p>The lepton mass formula and the quark mass formula are derived from the incorporation of basic gluon (g* = B<sub>6</sub> = M<sub>F6</sub>/α = M<sub>e</sub>/α = 70 MeV from Equation (1)) from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1 to electron. The incorporation of basic gluon as flux quanta follows the composite fermion theory for the FQHE (fractional quantum Hall effect) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref10">10</xref>]. In the composite fermion model for FQHE, the formation of composite fermion is through the attachment of an even number of magnetic flux quanta to electron, while the formation of composite boson is through the attachment of an odd number of magnetic flux quanta to electron. In the same way, the formation of composite fermion is through the attachment of an even number of basic gluons to electron, while the formation of composite boson is through the attachment of an odd number of basic gluons to electron. The formation of composite boson is equal to the formation of composite di-leptons, so the formation of composite lepton is through the attachment of one half of an odd number of basic gluons to electron. As a result, the muon (&#181;) mass formula is as follows.</p><p>M μ 7 = M e + 3 M g* / 2 = M e + 3 M e / 2 α = 105.5488   MeV (4)</p><p>which is in excellent agreement with the observed 105.6584 MeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref11">11</xref>] for the mass of muon. The masses of leptons follow the Barut lepton mass formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref12">12</xref>] as follows.</p><p>M lepton = M e + 3 M e 2 α ∑ a = 0 n a 4 , (5)</p><p>where a = 0, 1, and 2 are for e, μ<sub>7</sub>, and τ<sub>7</sub>, respectively. The calculated mass of τ<sub>7</sub> is 1786.2 MeV in good agreement with the observed mass as 1776.82 MeV. According to Barut, the second term, ∑ a = 0 n a 4 of the mass formula is for the</p><p>Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization for a charge-dipole interaction in a circular orbit. The more precise calculated mass of τ for the tau lepton mass formula is as follows.</p><p>M τ = M e + ( 3 M e 2 α − M e ) ∑ 2 4 = M e + ( 17 3 M e 2 α − 17 M e ) ​ = 1777.47 ​ ​ ​     MeV , (6)</p><p>which is in excellent agreement with observed 1776.82 MeV, and means that during this dipole-interaction in a circular orbit for τ, an electron with total mass of 17M<sub>e</sub> is lost. 17M<sub>e</sub> is shown as the observed 17 MeV for 34M<sub>e</sub> in the light boson (17 eē) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Quark has fractional charge (&#177;1/3 or &#177;2/3), 3-color gluons (red, green, and blue) for 3g*, and both the principal mass dimensions and axillary mass dimensions, so similar to Equation (4), d and u in the principal mass dimension involves e/3 or 2e/3 and 3g* as follows.</p><p>principal mass dimensional oribital at     d = 6 M principal   q = 1   or   2 M e 3 + 3 ( 3 M g* ) 2                                           = 1   or   2 M e 3 + 3 ( 3 M B6 ) 2                                           = 1   or   2 M e 3 + 9 M e 2 α (7)</p><p>For quarks in the auxiliary mass dimensions, 3-color basic gluons (3g*) become 3-color auxiliary basic gluons (3g*<sub>a7</sub>) at d = 7. From Equations (1) and (3), α<sub>w</sub> = α<sub>7</sub> = α of week interaction = (M<sub>B6</sub>/M<sub>B7</sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> = (M<sub>F6</sub>/α/M<sub>B7</sub>) <sup>1/2</sup> = (M<sub>e</sub>/α/M<sub>Z</sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> = 0.02771. Based on Equation (2), auxiliary basic gluon is derived from muon as follows.</p><p>M g* a 7 = M μ 7 α w (8)</p><p>Similar to Equation (4), the masses of quarks in the auxiliary mass dimension are as follows.</p><p>auxiliary mass dimensional orbital at     d = 7 M auxiliary   q 7 = 3 ( 3 M g * a 7 ) 2 ∑ a = 1 n a 4 = 9 M μ 7 α w 2 ∑ a = 1 n a 4 (9)</p><p>The quark mass formula at d = 7 is the combination of Equations (7) and (9) as follows.</p><p>M q 7 = 1   or   2 M e 3 + 9 M e 2 α + 9 M μ 7 α w 2 ∑ a = 1 n a 4 (10)</p><p>where a = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for u<sub>7</sub>/d<sub>7</sub>, s<sub>7</sub>, c<sub>7</sub>, b<sub>7</sub>, and t<sub>7</sub>, respectively.</p><p>The quark mass at a = 5 for the auxiliary mass dimension at d = 7 is the maximum mass below the mass of B<sub>7</sub>, so the next auxiliary mass dimension has to start from B<sub>7</sub>. There are b and t at d = 8, so it is necessary to have μ<sub>8</sub> for the masses of b and t. Like μ<sub>7</sub> in Equation (4), the mass of μ<sub>8</sub> is as follows.</p><p>M μ 8 0 = 2 M e + 3 M g* 7 / 2 = 2 M e + 3 M B7 / 2 = 2 M e + 3 M Z 0 / 2 = 136.78   GeV , (11)</p><p>Since at d = 7, there are 3-color basic gluons, at d = 8, 3-color basic gluons are not needed, and only one basic gluon (g*<sub>7</sub>) at d = 7 is used. Similar to Equations (7) and (9), the quark mass formulas for the principal and auxiliary mass dimensions are as follows.</p><p>principal mass dimensional orbital at d = 7 M principal   quark = 3 M g * 7 / 2 = 3 M B 7 / 2 = 3 M Z / 2 (12)</p><p>auxiliary mass dimensional orbital at d = 8 M auxiliary quark = 3 ( M g * a 8 ) 2 ​ ∑ a ′ = 1 n ′ a ′ 4 = 3 μ 8 0 α 2 ​ ∑ a ′ = 1 n ′ a ′ 4 (13)</p><p>The quark mass formula at d = 8 is the combination of Equations (10) and (11) as follows.</p><p>M q 8 = 3 M Z 2 + 3 M μ 8 0 α 2 ∑ a ′ = 1 n ′ a ′ 4 (14)</p><p>where a' = 1 and 2 for b ′ 8 and t ′ 8 , respectively.</p><p>Combining Equations (10) and (14), the quark mass formula is as follows.</p><p>M quark = 1   or   2 M e 3 + 9 M e 2 α + 9 M μ 7 α w 2 ∑ a = 1 n a 4 + 3 M Z 2 + 3 M μ 8 0 α 2 ​ ∑ a ′ = 1 n ′ a ′ 4 (15)</p><p>where a =1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for d/u. s, c, b, and t, respectively, and a'= 1 and 2 for b and t respectively. The calculated masses ford, u, s, c, b<sub>7</sub>, and t are 328.4 MeV, 328.6 MeV, 539.3 MeV, 1606.6 MeV, 4979.3 MeV, and 175.4 GeV, respectively. The calculated mass of b 8 ( = b 7 + b ′ 8 ) is 143,258 MeV. In the SM, there are three generations of leptons. Extra-muon &#181;<sub>8</sub> is outside of the three generations of leptons in the SM, so &#181;<sub>8</sub> is absent as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1, to be symmetrical to the absent &#181;<sub>8</sub>, b<sub>8</sub> quark is also absent. In other words, b<sub>8</sub> quark is hidden. The calculated mass of top quark is 175.4 GeV in good agreement with the observed 172.4 GeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref11">11</xref>]. The periodic table of elementary particles calculates accurately the particle masses of all leptons, quarks, gauge bosons, hadrons, the Higgs boson, and the cosmic rays by using only five known constants: the number (seven) of the extra spatial dimensions in the observed four-dimensional space time from the eleven-dimensional membrane, the mass of electron, the masses of Z and W bosons, and the fine structure constant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Beauty-Quark Decays</title><p>As described in the previous section, the mass of b<sub>7</sub> is 4974.6 MeV, while the mass of b<sub>8</sub> is 143,258 MeV. In the SM, there are three generations of leptons. Extra-muon &#181;<sub>8</sub> is outside of the three generations of leptons in the SM, so &#181;<sub>8</sub> is absent as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1. To be symmetrical to the absent &#181;<sub>8</sub>, b<sub>8</sub> quark is also absent. In other words, b<sub>8</sub> quark is hidden. As a result, the observable b<sub>7</sub> and the hidden b<sub>8</sub> form the binary isotope mixture.</p><p>A beauty meson (B<sup>+</sup>) transforms into a strange meson (K<sup>+</sup>) with the emission of leptons (ℓ<sup>+</sup>ℓ<sup>−</sup>) which is either electron-positron (e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>) or muon-antimuon (&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>). The decay process includes a transition state where the decay process is mediated by virtual particles that can have a physical mass larger than the mass difference between the initial- and final-state particles. In the SM, these virtual particles include the electroweak-force carriers, the γ, W&#177; and Z˚ bosons, and the top quark as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>In the transition state before the decay, from B<sup>+</sup>, the binary isotope mixture of beauty quarks emerges along with the virtual particles (γ, W&#177; and Z˚) that can have a physical mass larger than the mass difference between the initial- and final-state particles. In the transition state, the binary isotope mixture is virtual. The rates of emergence as the rates of diffuse in Graham’s law of diffusion are proportional to inverse square root of mass.</p><p>R b = ( M b 7 / M b 8 ) 1 / 2 = ( 4979 / 143258 ) 1 / 2 = 0.1864 (16)</p><p>The preservation of the generation number symmetry to have the absent &#181;<sub>8</sub> forbids b<sub>8</sub> to decay into K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, while b<sub>7</sub> can decay into K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>. As a result, b<sub>7</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, while b<sub>8</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and forbidden &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>. (The forbidden &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> simply turns into γ.) The calculated ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup>→ K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>is as follows.</p><p>R K = 0.5 / ( 0.5 R b + 0.5 ) = 0.5 / ( 0.5 &#215; 0.1864 + 0.5 ) = 0.843 (17)</p><p>The calculated ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> is 0.843 in excellent agreement with the observed 0.846. The agreement between the calculated R<sub>K</sub> and the observed R<sub>K</sub> confirms the validity of the periodic table of elementary particles.</p><p>On molecular level, the emergence of the binary isotope mixture of b<sub>7</sub> and the hidden b<sub>8</sub> from B<sup>+</sup> is similar to the diffusion of the binary isotope mixture of</p><p>gaseous molecules. One of the well-known examples of the binary isotope mixture is the binary isotope mixture of <sup>3</sup>He/<sup>4</sup>He from the degassing of the Earth’s mantle through magmatism that results in the irreversible loss of helium to space, and high <sup>3</sup>He/<sup>4</sup>He ratios observed in oceanic basalts have been considered the main evidence for a “primordial” undegassed deep mantle reservoir [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref15">15</xref>]. The initial ratio of the degassing rates from Graham’s law between <sup>3</sup>He/<sup>4</sup>He is as follows.</p><p>R He = ( M H 4 e / M H 3 e ) 1 / 2 = ( 4 / 3 ) 1 / 2 = 1.15 (18)</p><p>As a result, the initial rate ratio of degassing is 1.15 which is confirmed by the observation. Another example of the binary isotope mixture is the neon isotope mixture of<sup>20</sup>Ne/<sup>22</sup>Ne [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref16">16</xref>]. The isotopic diffusivity ratio for neon (<sup>20</sup>Ne/<sup>22</sup>Ne) in silicate glasses appears to equal the inverse square-root of the isotopic masses as 1.05.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Dark Matter and the Dominance of Matter over Antimatter</title><p>It is speculated that since the SM is unable to explain cosmological observations of the dominance of matter over antimatter, the apparent dark-matter content of the Universe, or explain the patterns seen in the interaction strengths of the particles, the new physics derived from the violation of lepton universality can explain the SM’s shortcomings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref1">1</xref>]. In the Section 2, the periodic table of elementary particles explains the patterns seen in the interaction strengths of the particles for leptons and quarks. In this Section, dark matter and the dominance of matter over antimatter are explained by the periodic table of elementary particles.</p><p>The origins of dark matter and baryonic matter were explained in the references [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref17">17</xref>]. There are five types of dark matter and one type of baryonic matter with the mass ratio of 5:1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref17">17</xref>]. In the periodic table of elementary particles, the five types of dark matter are the five sterile massive right-handed neutrinos, ν<sub>DM5</sub>, ν<sub>DM6</sub>, ν<sub>DM7</sub>, ν<sub>DM8</sub>, and ν<sub>DM9</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref5">5</xref>]. At 72.8% dark energy, the calculated values for baryonic matter and dark matter (with the 1:5 ratio) are 4.53% (=(100 − 72.8)/6) and 22.65% (=4.53 &#215; 5), respectively, in excellent agreement with observed 4.56% and 22.7%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>The dominance of matter over antimatter can be explained by B<sub>10</sub> in the table for the principal mass dimensional bosons derived from the periodic table of elementary particles as in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2.</p><p>The lowest energy gauge boson (B<sub>5</sub>) at d = 5 is the Coulomb field for electromagnetism. The second gauge lowest boson (B<sub>6</sub>) at d = 6 is basic gluon (g* = 70 MeV ≈ one half of pion) is the strong force as the nuclear force in the pion theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref19">19</xref>] where pions mediate the strong interaction at long enough distances (longer than the nucleon radius) or low enough energies. B<sub>6</sub> is denoted as basic gluon, g*. At short enough distances (shorter than the nucleon radius) or high enough energies, gluons emerge to confine fractional charge quarks. Fractional charge quarks are confined by gluons in QCD (quantum chromodynamics). No</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</label><caption><title> The masses of the principal mass dimensional bosons (gauge bosons) M d , B = M d,F / α d and M d + 1,B = M d , B / α d + 1 2 from Equations (1) and (3)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>d</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M<sub>d</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GeV (calculated)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gauge boson</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interaction</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M<sub>e</sub>α</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A = photon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Electromagnetic</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M<sub>e</sub>/α</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> (70.02 MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g* = basic gluon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M Z = M B6 / α w 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.1876 (given)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z<sub>L</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >weak (left) for baryonic matter<sub> </sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M 7 / α 2 = M Z / α 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z<sub>R</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >weak (right) for dark matter<sub> </sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>9</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M 8 / α 2 = M Z / α 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >dark matter repulsive force<sub> </sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>10</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M 9 / α 2 = M Z / α 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.04 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >particle-antiparticle asymmetry<sub> </sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>11</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M 10 / α 2 = M Z / α 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G<sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >gravity</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>isolated fractional charge quark is allowed, and only collective integer charge quark composites are allowed. In general, collective fractional charges are confined by the short-distance confinement force field where the sum of the collective fractional charges is integer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref20">20</xref>]. As a result, fractional charges are confined and collective. The confinement force field includes gluons for collective fractional charge quarks in hadrons and the magnetic flux quanta for collective fractional charge quasiparticles in the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>The third lowest boson (B<sub>7</sub>) at d = 7 is Z<sub>L</sub> for the left-handed weak interaction among leptons and quarks. Massive weak bosons produce short-distance interaction. B<sub>8</sub> at d = 8 is Z<sub>R</sub> for the right-handed weak interaction among dark matter neutrinos as dark matter neutrino oscillation. The symmetry between Z<sub>R</sub> and Z<sub>L</sub> provides the neutrino oscillation for both baryonic matter neutrinos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref24">24</xref>] and dark matter neutrinos.</p><p>B<sub>9</sub> as the gauge boson represents dark matter repulsive force. The condensed baryonic gas at the critical surface density (derived from the acceleration constant a<sub>0</sub> in MOND [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref26">26</xref>] ) induces the creation tensor for dark matter repulsive force to transform dark matter in the region into repulsive dark matter repulsing one another, corresponding to the Farnes’ repulsive dark matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref27">27</xref>]. Before the emergence of dark matter repulsive force, dark matter in the CMB was not repulsive.</p><p>B<sub>10</sub> at d = 10 is for the gauge boson for particle-antiparticle asymmetry to provide the slight excess of particle in particle-antiparticle at the Big Bang, while B<sub>8</sub> has particle-antiparticle symmetry. (B<sub>9</sub> emerged long after the Big Bang.) As a result, the excess of particle is α<sup>4</sup> (2.8 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup>) per particle-antiparticle (photon) for the ratio between B<sub>8</sub> and B<sub>10</sub>. Since baryonic matter is 1/6 of dark matter and baryonic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref17">17</xref>], the baryonic matter excess is 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>−10</sup> which is in a good agreement with 6 &#215; 10<sup>−10</sup> for the ratio of the numbers between baryonic matter and photons in the Big Bang nucleosynthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109311-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>B<sub>11</sub> is for gravity. F<sub>11</sub> (8.275 &#215; 10<sup>16</sup> GeV) relates to spin 3/2 gravitino, while B<sub>11</sub> (1.134 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup> GeV) relates to spin 2 graviton. In supersymmetry, gravitino and graviton mediate the supersymmetry between fermion and boson in space dimension and gravitation. There are 11 space dimensions in the 11 space time dimensional membrane. As a result, the supersymmetry involves 11 F<sub>11</sub> + B<sub>11</sub>, which is equal to 1.225 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup> GeV in excellent agreement with the Planck mass (1.221 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup> GeV) derived from observed gravity as (ћc/G)<sup>1/2</sup> where c is the speed of light, G is the gravitational constant, and ħ is the reduced Planck constant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Summary</title><p>In summary, this paper purposes an explanation for the recent evidence for the violation of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. A beauty meson (B<sup>+</sup>) transforms into a strange meson (K<sup>+</sup>) with the emission of either electron-positron (e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>) or muon-antimuon (&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>). The ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> decays is measured to be R<sub>K</sub> = 0.846 instead of 1 in the violation of lepton universality in the Standard Model. This paper proposes that the violation is derived from the binary isotope mixture of two beauty-quarks, b<sub>7</sub> (4979 MeV mass) and b<sub>8</sub> (143,258 MeV mass) whose masses are calculated from the periodic table of elementary particles. b<sub>7</sub> is the observable B, while b<sub>8</sub> is the hidden B to preserve the generation number symmetry between the three lepton family generations and the three quark family generations in the Standard Model. The preservation of the generation number symmetry forbids b<sub>8</sub> to decay into K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>. In the transition state involving the virtual particles (γ, W&#177; and Z˚) before the decay, b<sub>7</sub> and b<sub>8</sub> emerge to form the binary isotope mixture from B. The rates of emergence as the rates of diffuse in Graham’s law of diffusion are proportional to inverse square root of mass. The rate ratio between b<sub>8</sub>/b<sub>7</sub> is (4979/143,258)<sup>1/2</sup> = 0.1864. Since b<sub>7</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, while b<sub>8</sub> decays into K<sup>+</sup>, e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup>, and forbidden &#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup>, the calculated ratio (R<sub>K</sub>) of branching fractions for B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>+</sup>&#181;<sup>−</sup> and B<sup>+</sup> → K<sup>+</sup>e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> is 0.5/(0.1864 &#215; 0.5 + 0.5) = 0.843 in excellent agreement with the observed 0.846. The agreement between the calculated R<sub>K</sub> and the observed R<sub>K</sub> confirms the validity of the periodic table of elementary particles which provides the answers for the dominance of matter over antimatter, dark-matter, and the mass hierarchy of elementary particles.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chung, D.-Y (2021) An Explanation for the Violation of Lepton Universality in Beauty-Quark Decays: The Binary Isotope Mixture of Beauty-Quarks. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 971-982. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.127059</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.109311-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LHCb Collaboration (2021) Test of Lepton Universality in Beauty-Quark Decays. arXiv:2103.11769 [hep-ex]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11769</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (1997) Speculations in Science and Technology, 20, 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026433207862</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. and Hefferlin, R. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 21-26. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.44A004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1591-1606. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.712144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 2308-2319. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.913146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 2638-2656. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.914164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2019) Journal of Modern Physics, 10, 1310-1341. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2019.1011087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2020) Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1091-1122. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.117069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamilla, R., Wu, X. and Jain, J. (1996) Physics Review Letters, 76, 1332. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1332</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, J. (2007) Composite Fermions. Cambridge University Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Particle Data Group (2018) Physical Review D, 98, Article ID: 030001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barut, A. (1979) Physical Review Letters, 42, 1251. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krasznahorkay, A., et al. (2016) Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 042501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.042501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feng, J., et al. (2016) Physical Review Letters, 117, Article ID: 071803. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.071803</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Class, C. and Goldstein, S. (2005) Nature, 436, 1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03930</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rama, S. and Hart, S. (1965) Science, 147, 737-738. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3659.737</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. and Krasnoholovets, V. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.47A1009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jarosik, N., et al. (2010) Seven-Year Wilson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic Results. http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr4/pub_papers/sevenyear/basic_results/wmap_7yr_basic_results.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujita, J. and Miyazawa, H. (1957) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 17, 360. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.17.360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, D. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1150-1159. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.710104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsui, D., Stormer, H. and Gossard, A. (1982) Physical Review Letters, 48, 1559-1562. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stormer, H. (1999) Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 875-889. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laughlin, R. (1983) Physical Review Letters, 50, 1395-1398. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loureiro, A., et al. (2019) Physical Review Letters, 123, Article ID: 081301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.081301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milgrom, M. (1989) Astronomy and Astrophysics, 211, 37-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milgrom, M. (2009) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1023-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15255.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farnes, J. (2018) Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, 620, A92. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109311-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steigman, G. (2007) Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 57, 463-491. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>