<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.115054</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-109186</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Maternal-Fetal Prognosis of Delivery in the Presentation of the Seat at the Kayes Hospital (Mali)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahamadou</surname><given-names>Diassana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ballan</surname><given-names>Macalou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sitapha</surname><given-names>Dembele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Sidibe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Hamido</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Konate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Soumana</surname><given-names>Oumar Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamadou</surname><given-names>Sima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheickna</surname><given-names>Sylla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amadou</surname><given-names>Bocoum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seydou</surname><given-names>Fane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Soumaila</surname><given-names>Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at SIKASSO Regional Hospital, Sikasso, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Kayes Reference Health Centre, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at GABRIEL TOURE University Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Fousseyni DAOU Hospital, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the G-Spot University Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Reference Health Centre in Bamako Commune V, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>578</fpage><lpage>590</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: 
  The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with seat presentation and to determine the maternal-fetal prognosis of delivery in the presentation of the seat. <b>Materials and methods: </b>This was a descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical case-control study with prospective data collection, from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, a 12-month period at Kayes Hospital, Mali. <b>Results: </b>During our study period we recorded 3820 deliveries, including 120 breos; a frequency of 3.14% of all deliveries. The 20
   
  -
   
  35 age group was the most represented in cases 61.7%. Of the cases 66.7% (n-80) were out of school, we note 75.8% (n-182) of out-of-school controls. Primipar
  a
  es were the majority among cases 39.2% (n-47), as were 39.1% of the controls (n-118). The cases had a history of caesarean section at 15% (n-18); 13, 3% (n-32). The most common mode of presentation was the 70% decomplete seat. It was mainly the anterior left sacro iliac variety (85.8%). The low pathway was preferred during these deliveries to 70% against 30% of caesarean section of which 28.3% of cases were carried out in an emergency. Several factors such as delivery pathway, mode of presentation, length of expulsion and obstetric manoeuvres used influenced fetal prognosis. Fetal complications were dominated by acute fetal suffering (15.8%), followed by dislocation of the shoulder (0.8%). The most common morbid maternal complications were soft part tears (15 cases or 12.5%) and parietal suppuration (1 case or 0.8%). We did not record any maternal deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results confirm that childbirth is a risky delivery, and must require careful selection of eligible cases and rigorous management of labour with trained teams. In these circumstances, it seems totally abusive to advocate as a single mode of delivery caesarean section in all presentations of the chair in the primigestes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Siege Delivery</kwd><kwd> Obstetric Prognosis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Seat presentation is a longitudinal presentation where the pelvic end of the fetus first appears in the upper strait area. This is the most common irregular presentation. The overall incidence of breo-seat deliveries worldwide ranges from 3% to 4.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref1">1</xref>]. In Africa, it ranges from 1.52% to 5.4%. In Mali, Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] had found in two years a frequency of 2.74% of all deliveries at the Gabriel Tour&#233; University Hospital. It is a high-risk birth of mortality and fetal-maternal morbidity because of its potentially “dystoctic” nature. Therefore, a situation worries the obstetricalteame around the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref1">1</xref>]. The mode of delivery in the presentation of the term seat remains at the origin of much passionate debate around the world. Vaginal delivery in the event of a brecover presentation would be associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality. As early as 1951 WRIGHT advocated routine caesarean section in order to reduce the perinatal morbidity and mortality rate 4 - 6 times higher than the presentation of the summit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref3">3</xref>]. This attitude was very controversial at the time given the risk associated with the excess mortality and morbidity of caesarean section. The conditions of delivery are much better at present, yet the abundance of literature on perinatal prognosis still revives debates between proponents of routine caesarean section and supporters of the lower track in the event of siege presentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref5">5</xref>]. This discrepancy prevents the definition of a standard therapeutic attitude towards childbirth in the presentation of the seat. In developing countries, in addition to the prognosis problem associated with childbirth, the presentation of the siege also poses the problem of diagnosis, monitoring of pregnancy given the lack of health infrastructure and qualified medical personnel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>]. The lack of previous studies on this type of birth in our department motivated the initiation of this work.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Objective</title><p>The goal was to assess the risk factors associated with seat presentation and to determine the maternal-fetal prognosis of delivery in presentation of the seat.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Methods</title><p>This was a descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical case-control study with a prospective collection of data, ranging from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, a 12-month period at Kayes Hospital, Mali. Inclusion criteria: were included in our study: all cases and controls recorded during the study period. Cases, all pregnant and/or parturients admitted to the service for obstetric care on a pregnancy greater than or equal to 28 weeks of amenorrhea (SA) with fetuses presenting the seat. Witnesses, all pregnant and/or parturients admitted to the service for obstetrical care on a pregnancy greater than or equal to 28 SA with fetuses in presentation of the summit. For each case of brecge delivery, the following two summit presentation deliveries were taken as witnesses. The exclusion criteria: were excluded from this work: any other mode of presentation: forehead, face, transverse; fetal malformations incompatible with life; stillborn fetuses macerated. The data collection was done by an individual survey sheet for each patient. The data sources were made up of the CPN Notebooks, patient records, patient examination, the operating report registry, the delivery register. The data entry was done on Microsoft Word 10 and analyzed on Microsoft Excel 10, IBM SPSS 20 software. The anonymity and confidentiality of those involved in the study were respected. The limitations of this work were among other things: the absence of third trimester ultrasound and radiopelvimetry in most of our parturients; the lack of specific means of monitoring labour (cardiotocograph, PH metrics).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Epidemiological Aspects</title><p>During our study period, we recorded 120 breest deliveries out of a total of 3820 deliveries, a frequency of 3.14%. The 20 - 35 age group was the most represented at 61.7% with anaverage age of25years and extremes ranging from 14to 45years for cases versus an average age of 26years and extremes ranging from 15to 44years for controls. Of the cases 66.7% of the parturients were out of school compared to 75.8% of out-of-school controls. Housewives accounted for 84.2% of the number of cases compared to 87.9% of witnesses. On the other hand, 2.5% were civil servants compared to 0% of witnesses. These epidemiological aspects are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Clinical Aspects</title><p>Reference/Evacuation: parmi cases 79.20% of parturients were admitted directly against 20.80% reference/Evacuation. Primipares accounted for 39.2% of the workforce among cases compared to 39.1% for witnesses. (No.118). The history of caesarean section was noted in 15% of the parturients among the cases compared to 13.3% among the controls. Prenatal consultations were of good quality in 4.1% versus 5% among controls. They were of poor quality in 25% against 34.2% among witnesses. The associated risk actors f were uterine myoma in 1.7%; uterine malformation in 4.2%; hydramnios 2.5%; scarred uterus in 11.7%; g&#233;m&#233;llity 32.4%. Birth labour abnormalities were dominated by dynamic dystocies in 15% in cases versus 6.2% among controls; mechanical dystocies</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Epidemiological aspects</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age range</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >case</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 35 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;35 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >official</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >merchant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.65</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>were noted in 11.5% versus 5.4% among controls; hemorrhage in 3.3% versus 1.7% of controls; cord procidence in 1.7%. The delivery pathway among the cases was the caesarean section at 30% and the low pathway at 70%; that of the controls was the caesarean section at 7.1% and the lower pathway at 92.9%. The duration of the labour was 12 hours in 81.7% in the series of cases and 97.5% in the controls. The length of deportation was 45 minutes in 90% in the series of cases and 93.75% in the controls. Episiotomy was performed in 70% of cases and 6.7% of controls. In cases 36% of deliveries took place without any obstetric maneuvering. Obstetrical work:BRACHT was used in 60% of cases, MAURICEAU in 9.2% of cases and LOVSET in 0.8% of cases. The indications of caesarean section: cesarean sections were performed before labour and during labour. Before labour, the presentation of the seat in a primipara was noted in 1cas and 7 cas during labour. The fetal-pelvic disproportion was noted in 2 cas. 14 cas of cicatricial uterus were noted. Stationary dilation was noted in 4 cas; only one case of fetal suffering was reported; cord procidence 4 cas; pelvis abnormalities 3 cas condylome 1 cas. Macrosomy involved 6 infants, or 5% of cases. These clinical aspects presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and Tables 2-4.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical aspects (Risk Factors for Head Office Presentation) 2018-2019 at Kayes Hospital, Mali</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >parity</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >case</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paucipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Large multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical anecerties</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myomectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine plastia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Quality Prenatal Consultation (NPC)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Risk factors associated with</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine Myoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydramnios</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scarred uterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gemini</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-lt;0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical aspects</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Work anomaly</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >case</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dynamic dystocia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mechanical dystocia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >haemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.52</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cord procidence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetric maneuvers</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bracht</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mauritius</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lovset</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Birth weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500g - 3500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3500 g - 4000 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4000 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical aspects</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Delivery path</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >case</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stastitic testing</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >low lane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of deportation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 minutes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 minutes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Episiotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indications of caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before the birthing labour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >During the labour of delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Introducing the seat at primipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal-pelvic disproportion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scarred uterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stationary dilation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute fetal suffering</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cord procidence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pelvis abnormalities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Maternal-Fetal Prognosis</title><p>Maternal complications were dominated by vulvo-vaginal tears 12.5%, parietal Suppuration 0.8%; we recorded no maternal complications in controls, nor any maternal deaths in the study. Neonatal complications: dislocating the shoulder 1 cas or 0.8%. 95.8% of the newborns in our series were born alive however 4.2% died. Thematernal-fetal prognosis is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>Analytical results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Epidemiological Aspects</title><p>In the literature, authors report variable frequency rates. During the study period, we collected 120 breest deliveries out of a total of 3820 deliveries, representing a frequency of 3.14%. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> presents data on the frequency of birth by the seat by the authors.</p><p>The frequency of siege deliveries varies from country to country. Our high rate of seat presentation could be explained on the one hand: the fact that we have included multiple pregnancies and preterm births that are frequently associated with the presentation of the seat; and on the other hand by the fact that our service is the last resort for the management of obstetric emergencies in the referral/evacuation system in the Kayes area.</p><p>Age: We did not find a statistically significant difference between the average age of our cases 25 years and that of their witnesses P-0.05. This result is similar to those of Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>], Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] in Mali, Farsi I F. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref10">10</xref>] in Senegal, Macombou P. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref6">6</xref>] in Congo, Erkaya S. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref11">11</xref>] in Turkey, and Rosenau L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref12">12</xref>] in France, which reported an average age of 24, 26 years, 27 years, 29 years, 25 years and 27</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The maternal-fetal prognosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Maternal complications</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Case</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vulvo-vaginal tear</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parietal suppuration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fetal and neonatal complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SFA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >fracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brachial plexus paralysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shoulder luxation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >239</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P and lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Newborn status</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statistical test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >alive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >deceased</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="6"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Analytical results</title></caption><table-wrap id="6_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >parity</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Delivery lane</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Statistical test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Low track</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Witnesses</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >69.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >26.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paucipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Large multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Apgar score in the<sup>1st</sup> minute</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Pregnancy monitoring</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >case</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Witnesses</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >36.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >79.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >63.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Apgar score in the<sup>1st</sup> minute</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Obstetric maneuvers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Bracht</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Mauritius</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lovset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >72.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >87.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Apgar score in the<sup>1st</sup> minute</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >How to present</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Statistical test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Full seat</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Unseating seat</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-0.96</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The frequency of home birth 2018-2019 at Kayes Hospital, Mali</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Authors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >staff</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macombou P. Congo 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref6">6</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tour&#233; M. Mali 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hannah M E. Hannha W J. Canada 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Our Mali 2018 study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>years respectively. We did not find a statistically significant correlation between age and seat presentation in this study P-0.05; on the other hand Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>] in common V/Bamako in 2001 found that relative young age is a factor of poor fetal prognosis with a p-0.031. The female population of Mali is predominantly made up of housewives. Thus we noted 84.2% of housewives among cases and 87.9% among controls without statistically significant difference P-0.55. Most studies in Mali report markedly high rates of housewives So: Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>] in 2001, Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] in 2004, and Tour&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>] in 2008 in Mali (Bamako) reported 91.3%, 71.43%, and 90.5% in their respective studies. These are most often out-of-school pregnant women, so they are very reluctant to understand the risks associated with this type of situation during pregnancy. The problem: in this study, the frequency of seat presentation decreases with parity. Thus we noted 39.2% of primiparous, 30.8% of paucipares among cases against 49.1% and 26.3% among the witnesses P-0.05. Other authors such as Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] and Tour&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>] Mali (Bamako) reported 33.6% and 38.1% primiparous with 37.83% and 21.9% paucipares. Our high rate of priparousness could be explained by the precocity of sexual intercourse (early marriage i.e. before the age of 18). Multipares and large multipares accounted for only 14.2% and 15.8% respectively in cases; statistically significant difference with their witnesses. Indeed, the accommodation disorder in the multipare due to the loosening of the uterine walls explains the occurrence of the presentations of the seat in the latter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>]. Surgical antecedents: a scary uterus always presents a risk of dehiscence during pregnancy or childbirth. In the case of the presentation of the seat, the history of uterine surgery is important to take into account as it may indicate a caesarean section from the outset. 15% of our cases had a history of caesarean section compared to 13.3% of P-0.66 controls. Rates close to ours have been reported by Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] and Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>] 10.92% and 11% respectively. The history of caesarean section was found associated with brecover delivery in 4.8% and 7.4% of cases respectively in the Tour&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>] studies in Mali and Farsi I F. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref10">10</xref>] in Senegal. We found in this study 1.7% of cases of myomectomy.</p><p>Pregnancy follow-up: 9.2% of cases did not have any prenatal follow-up. This rate is close to that of the controls without a statistically significant difference (p-0.47). This rate is close to that of Manefoue HM. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref13">13</xref>] 9.4% at the G-spot CHU in 2008. Other authors like Brahim O. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref14">14</xref>] in Tunisia; and Farsi I L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref10">10</xref>] in Senegal reported 35% and 34.1%, respectively. One of the goals of prenatal consultation in the last month of pregnancy is to determine the prognosis of delivery. Most of the gestantes collected in this study did not benefit from this assessment either because of the poor quality of NPCs or because of the lack of prenatal follow-up. These are pregnant women whose prognosis of delivery has been assessed in the labour room sometimes in emergency situations. 20.8% of our cases were evacuated from other socio-health structures compared to 5% of the witnesses. These are the parturients who were first received in other structures and then evacuated because of abnormalities related to the evolution of the labour. Clinical examen: taille of the parturient, and obstetric assessment of size is important as soon as the gestant is admitted to the work room. 3.3% of our cases were less than 150 cm in size. This rate is close to that of witnesses (5%) without a statistically significant difference (P-0.46). The size of 150cm was associated with the presentation of the seat in 2.52%, 5.2% 7.6% respectively in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>]. The average size of our cases was 163 cm. Other authors like Farsi IF. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref10">10</xref>] in Senegal and Rosenau L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref12">12</xref>] in France reported average sizes 163 cm and 162 cm respectively. Fetal cardiac cardiac rhythm: The assessment of the routine fetal heart rate at admission was done exclusively to Pinard’s stethoscope. In this study, we found a frequency of bradycardia in cases: 5%. Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] reported in 2005 to Gabriel Tour&#233; 17.6% bradycardia. Our low rate could be explained by the absence of fairly sensitive equipment (cardiotocograph) in our service. Some factors may have contributed to altering the heart rate of the fetus in our study. These are: delays in the decision-making of the evacuation, the mode of evacuation, dynamic dystocies (15%), mechanical dystocies (11%), cord procidence (1.7%). Fetal resentation: 30% of fetuses in admission cases had a full-seat presentation versus 70% of mode counted with a statistically significant difference of p-0.0000. Authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>] reported respectively 59.4%, 54.6%, and 51.4% full seat against 40.6%, 45.4% and 48.6% of decompeted fashion without having a statistically significant difference of p-0.05. Primiparous with full seat presentation represented 44.4% versus 36.9% of the seat completed without a statistically significant difference (p-0.43). The anterior left sacro iliac variety was most common with 85.8%. In our cases, we found a statistically lower presentation engagement rate than their witnesses P-lt; 0.05. This difference could be explained by the potentially dystopic nature of the labour in the presentation of the seat.</p><p>Births: Several factors determined the pathway of delivery in this study. We found in this study a higher rate of caesarean section than the presentation of the summit P &lt; 0.05; and cases were 6 times more likely to give birth by caesarean section than their witnesses (OR-5.6; IC: (1.37 - 3.82). Caesarean section was performed in 69.4% of the primigestes. These are caesarean sections performed in emergency 27% of cases. The main indication of caesarean section was the presentation of the seat in the primipare associated with other factors (acute fetal suffering, large fetus in presentation of the seat, elderly primipare and abnormality of the pelvis) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p><p>Overall, they are higher in developed countries ranging from 44.4% to 90%. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>This variation could be explained by the diversity of the means of prenatal and per partum surveillance that allow us to properly evaluate all the prognostic factors of childbirth in order to determine the ideal route, but also by the principle adopted by some schools (systematic caesarean section in all primipares with presentation of the seat). The obstetric manoeuvres used were dominated by those of Bracht 60%, Mauriceau 9.2%, and Lovset 0.8%. Vermelin’s method was not practiced in our series. Expulsion during vaginal deliveries is less than or equal to 45 minutes in most cases (90%), compared to 93.75% of controls without a statistically significant difference of p-0.20. However, 10% of the cases had a deportation period of 45 minutes. These expulsion dystocies could be explained on the one hand by maternal exhaustion and on the other hand by dynamic dystocies requiring an infusion of oxytocin.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. The Pronostic</title><p>The maternal pronostic</p><p>In the literature several types of maternal complications have been described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>]. In this study, several types of maternal complications were found. These complications depend on the factors that are either related to the pregnancy itself (follow-up), or the mode of delivery, or both. Thus the most frequently encountered</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Frequency of Caesarean section in the literature</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >continent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Authors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farsi I F. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref10">10</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senegal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1997</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mali</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ILesanmi O A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref15">15</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Our study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mali</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Europe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Denis A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >France</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1990</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saunders N J.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >England</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Koo M R.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Netherlands</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1998</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laros</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1995</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schiff E.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>morbid complications were tears of the soft parts (15 cases or 12.5%) and parietal suppuration (1 case or 0.8%). We did not record any maternal deaths. Parietal suppuration, recorded in our study, was observed only in an evacuated parturient; it was not related to the presentation of the seat itself but is a morbid complication sometimes encountered after a caesarean section. If the maternal prognosis is generally good in delivery in the case of the presentation of the seat, the increase in the frequency of caesarean section is a factor to be taken into account.</p><p>Fetal pronostic</p><p>Acute fetal suffering was the main fetal complication found by most of the perpetrators. In our study, the frequency of acute fetal suffering in cases was statistically higher than that of our controls P &lt; 0.05; but without any statistical difference with those of the other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref7">7</xref>] P-0.05. We found a case of dislocation of the shoulder. Several factors contributed to the alteration of the fetal prognosis during brecit birth. The route of delivery in the event of the presentation of the seat can be an important morbid factor especially if all the conditions of acceptance of the seat are not respected. We found an alteration in Apgar’s score regardless of the route of delivery in our study, in cases compared to controls with an advantage in newborns born by caesarean section. We found a score of Apgar 7 at the fifth minute with no statistical difference between newborns born by caesarean section and those born by the lower route P-0.05. The benefit of caesarean section over vaginal delivery in children identified in our study is noted in the Canadian, British and American ≥ literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>]. Hannah-Hannah [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref8">8</xref>] reported 0.4% fetal mortality in caesarean delivery compared to 5.7% after vaginal delivery. These rates are almost better at our 2.8% and 3.6%. The fetal prognosis in our study was less good in the case of a full seat than in the case of a full seat because of the frequency of full seat abnormalities. 14% of newborns in full seat presentation had an Apgar score of less than 7 in the 5th minute compared to 3.6% of newborns presenting the decomplete seat p-0.09. Our results are lower than those found by Dicko B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref9">9</xref>] and Kon&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.109186-ref2">2</xref>] who rated 36.5% against 22% and 33.84% against 12% respectively. The fetal prognosis is inversely proportional to the length of expulsion. Indeed Apgar’s scores in the 1st and 5th minutes were bad when the expulsion time is more than 45 minutes. This would be explained by the fact that in the case of prolonged expulsion, especially if improper obstetric maneuvers are associated, hypoxia develops which results in the alteration of Apgar’s score.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>All the authors participated in the writing of the manuscript. They all approve the final version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Ethics Authorisation</title><p>The ethics committee’s authorization was found prior to the start of the study.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors state that they have no conflict of interest in this work.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diassana, M., Macalou, B., Dembele, S., Sidibe, A., Hamido, A., Konate, D., Traore, S.O., Sima, M., Sylla, C., Bocoum, A., Fane, S. and Traore, S. (2021) Maternal-Fetal Prognosis of Delivery in the Presentation of the Seat at the Kayes Hospital (Mali)e. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 578-590. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.115054</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.109186-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robert, M., Jean, L. and Jean, M. (1995) Accurate Obstetrics. Introducing the Seat. 6th Edition, Masson, Paris, 618.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koné, M. (2005) Accouchement in Presentation by Fetal and Maternal Prognostic Seat in the Obstetric Gynecology Department of the Gabriel Touré Hospital. Med’s Thesis, Bamako, No. 359.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wright</surname><given-names> R.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1959</year>)<article-title>Reduction of Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity in Breech Delivery through Routine Use of Caesarean Section</article-title><source> Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 758</fpage>-<lpage>763</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dufour, P. (2001) Introducing the Siege: The Last Day of the Low Track? Gynécologie Obstétrique &amp; Fertilité, 29, 337-338.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1297-9589(01)00142-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raudrant, D., Vaudoyer, F. and Golfier, F. (2001) Champion F. Low Track or Caesarean Section? The Presentation of the Term Seat: The Arguments for the Cesarean Section in Principle. Gynécologie Obstétrique &amp; Fertilité, 29, 729-732.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macombou, P., Buambo, B., et al. (2006) Accouchement in Presentation of the Siege at the Brazzaville University Hospital. Black African Medicine, 53, 287-292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Touré, M. (2008) Accouchement in Presentation of the Seat at the csref C VI Fetal and Maternal Prognosis. Thesis Med., Bamako, Number 502.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hannah, M.E., Hannah, W.J., Hewson, S.A., Hodnett, E.D. and Saigal, S. (2000) Vaginal Presentation Delivery: The End of an Era. The Lancet, 356, 1357-1383.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dicko, B. (2001) Siege Delivery, Fetal Prognosis for 103 Cases. Thesis Med., Bamako, Number 67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farsi, I.F. (1997) Epidemiology of Childbirth in Presentation of the Seat and Early Neonatal Follow-Up in a Reference Maternity Hospital in Black Africa: Prospective Study in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Dakar University Hospital. Thesis Med., Dakar, It’s 146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erkaya, S., Tuncer, A., Kutlar, I., Onat, N. and Ercakmak, S. (1997) Outcome of 1040 Consecutive Breech Deliveries Clinical Experience of Maternity Hospital in Turkey. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 59, 115-118.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00197-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenau, L., Grosieux, P., Denis, A., Lahlou, N. and Fournis, H. (1990) Facteurs pronostiques de l’accouchement en présentation du siège à propos de 357 grossesses monofoetales à terme. French Journal of Obstetricgynecology, 85, 271-281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manefoue, H.M. (2008) Accouchement et présentation du siège à propos de 96 cas. Thèse de Med Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brahim, O., Rachdi, R., Fekih, M.A., Mouelhi, C. and Messaoud, L. (1993) Fetal Prognosis of Brecit Birth: Statistical Study of 543 Observations. French Journal of Obstetricgynecology, 884, 249-252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>St. Saunders</surname><given-names> N.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>Controversies: The Mature Breech Should Be Delivered by Elective Cesarean Section</article-title><source> Journal of Perinatal Medicine</source><volume> 24</volume>,<fpage> 545</fpage>-<lpage>551</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.109186-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koo, M.R., Dekker, G.A. and Van Geizn, H.P. (1998) Perinatal Outcome of Singleton Term Breech Deliveries. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 78, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00278-9</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>