<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2021.94012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-108738</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Geochemistry and Heavy Metal Levels in the Sediments of the Port of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana, Dominican Republic
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramón</surname><given-names>Delanoy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Misael</surname><given-names>Díaz Asencio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Darlin</surname><given-names>Rodriguez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Division of Oceanology, Ensenada Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education, Ensenada, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, Institute of Physics, Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>205</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the Port of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana, chemical residues, organic matter and heavy metals from domestic activities are deposited together in the waters and sediments. The analysis of the sediments by X-ray fluorescence of four extracted and sectioned cores showed that concentrations of trace metals such as Nickel, Chromium, Lead and Mercury were present at various depths, exceeding Limits of Toxicity (PEL) for marine sediments according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Cadmium presented values 
  above the toxicity threshold (TEL) in its
   minimum values 
  and in its maximum values they exceeded the PEL value. While the Zinc and Copper values were low in all sections and lower than TEL. The analysis of the loss by ignition and the dating with lead 210 due to excess of the C4 core, showe
  d a sudden change in the organic matter content and sedimentation rate. The superficial sediments show that unlike the deeper ones, the heavy metal content is lower, as well as that they do not represent a risk to the ecosystem by not exceeding toxicity levels.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sediment</kwd><kwd> Heavy Metal</kwd><kwd> Port of Samana</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Fluorescence</kwd><kwd> Mercury</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The degradation of coastal areas is of great international concern (Angulo et al., 2006). Activities carried out in the cities of the interior of the continent as well as on the coasts, are affecting the coastal. These represent environmental assets that are being seriously affected (USAID-DSTA, 2006). The bay of Samana, specifically the Puerto Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana, has been under pressure over time, decreasing its environmental quality due to wastewater and sediment contributions from the town of Samana and from the peninsula (Eptisa SYSMIN Program, 2004). Although it does not have large polluting industries, some artisan workshops could contribute to the contamination of the coastal zone together with domestic activities. The main economic sources in the region are tourism, fishing and agriculture; being its main ruble the cultivation of coconut. In the peninsula there are basaltic and karst rocks as well as some rocks with mineralogical compounds of Titanium, Magnesium and Iron (Hernaiz-Huerta, 2004); which by erosion and weathering by rains (Rodr&#237;guez-Vegas et al., 2013), especially during the presence of hurricanes and storms typical of tropical regions (Angeli et al., 2020), are deposited forming sediments in the port determining its geochemistry (Escuder-Viruete, 2008a, 2008b). Benthic animals that feed on nutrients (Vald&#233;s et al., 2014) in the sediments of the seabed (Landsea &amp; Nicholls, 1996), can also ingest heavy metals that in many cases are toxic, inhibiting their development or reproduction (Ruelas-Inzunza et al., 2011). These heavy metals can also be bio-accumulated in the tissues and reach the humans through the food chain, which is harmful to health. The study of surface sediments gives us information (Loring &amp; Rantala, 1992) of the heavy metal contributions associated with these that have recently been deposited (Fukue et al., 2006). The taking of cores, in addition to giving us recent information, gives us information on how the content of heavy metals has varied as measures have been deposited (Alonso-Hern&#225;ndez et al., 2016). To determine heavy metals in sediments, there are many techniques, the most common being Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (FAA) and X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) (Margu&#237; et al., 2011). Because XRF is simple and inexpensive, it is preferably used over other techniques that are normally used for these studies, such as Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (FAA) with a flame or Graphite furnace. If, in addition to the analysis of the metal content, the loss by ignition and the dating with excess lead 210 (<sup>210</sup>Pb) (Appleby &amp; Oldfield, 1978), natural radio tracer (Muramat &amp; Evans, 1977) with the which we can have information on how these have changed over time and their content of organic matter (Gaudette et al., 1974).</p><p>Dating with lead 210 (Considine et al., 2011) allows us to determine how the Sedimentary Accumulation Rate and the contributions of organic matter (Binford &amp; Brenner, 1986) have varied for about 150 years and if it has been affected by climatic phenomena (Rozanski &amp; Gonfiantini, 2004). <sup>210</sup>Pb is a radioisotope as a result of Radio 226 decay, it can be determined by gamma, alpha or beta spectroscopy (Lozano et al., 2011). For the determination by beta spectroscopy, a Liquid Centello Counter (Mosqueda-Pe&#241;a, 2010) can be used, measuring the beta activity of Bismuth 210 in secular equilibrium with <sup>210</sup>Pb (Rodr&#237;guez et al., 1996). The gamma determination is carried out directly; while by alpha spectroscopy Polonium 210 (IAEA, 1992, 2016) is determined when it is in secular equilibrium with <sup>210</sup>Pb (Ruiz-Fern&#225;ndez &amp; S&#225;nchez-Cabeza, 2009), that is, when they are at the same level of radioactive emission. The TAS determined by dating with excess lead 210 (<sup>210</sup>Pb) (S&#225;nchez-Cabeza &amp; Ruiz-Fern&#225;ndez, 2012) can give us information if some measures adopted by the municipality have contributed to the decrease in the levels of heavy metals derived from human activities at any time or if there have been increases (Runnuw, 1999). As the Toxic Threshold Levels (TEL) and Permitted Toxic Levels (PEL) are above 2.0 mg/Kg in marine sediment (Buchman, 2008) in most heavy metals considered contaminants, the use of a technique to measure concentrations below this value, it is a waste of resources, in addition to being pollutants themselves, unlike XRF, which is a non-destructive technique, being able to use the sample for other analyzes or to be discarded more appropriately. The organic matter content by incineration of the sediment sample at 450 degrees Celsius is related to the loss of weight of the sample, this is known as loss by ignition (PPI) (Meyers &amp; Teranes, 2001). Chemical elements in specific amounts are necessary for the development of living things, but higher values can be toxic, especially when this occurs in a very short period of time.</p>Study Zone<p>The Port of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana is located north of the Bay of Samana (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), located north of the Dominican Republic; between the Samana peninsula and the Cordillera Oriental. The area of the port is 1.4 km<sup>2</sup> and its perimeter length is approximately 6.15 km. It is a port for small boats due to its low bathymetry. The Samana Peninsula, the place from which the natural sediments come to the port, is made up of Miocene-Pliocene siliciclastic rocks that have</p><p>been transformed. Quaternary marine terraces are also found, made up of stratified limestone composed of algae, mollusks and corals that are sometimes crystallized (Escuder-Viruete, 2008a, 2008b).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title>Methodology<p>1) For the determination of the metals in the sediments, the following procedure was carried out: Collection of 4 cores with Uwited gravity sampler (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Sectioning at 1 cm. Dried in a plastic sleeve at 45 degrees Celsius in an oven. Crushed sediments and sieved to 75 microns. Weighing 3 grams (UNEP/IOC/IAEA, 1995), compressed in a Specac press to make a tablet. Pellet analysis by XRF in Skyray Instrument EDX-36000B spectrometer. Use reference materials IAEA-356, BCR-277, SRM-1646a and SRM-1944. To determine the characteristics of the sediments, three cores were taken inside the Port and one outside with the objective of observing the variation in the composition of the majority elements and trace elements (Salamanca, 2003), especially those heavy metals toxic (Cadmium, Arsenic, Mercury, Lead, Zinc, Nickel and Copper) present in the sediments over time and to associate it with the development of the city of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana.</p><p>2) Lost by Ignition</p><p>From the sediments already crushed and sieved, a gram was burned of the sample in Muffle at 450˚C. The residue was weighed. %LOI = (W<sub>i</sub> − W<sub>f</sub>)/W<sub>i</sub> &#215; 100W<sub>i</sub> is the weigh initial and W<sub>f</sub> is the weight final. The analysis of the organic matter content related to the loss of ignition was one of the analyzed carried out on the core that we consider to be the most significant, which was the C4 core (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>3) Determination of the activity of Lead 210 in Secular equilibrium with Bismuth 210 in Sediments</p><p>From the sediments already crushed and sieved digestion of 1 gram of sample with concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acid inside a 20 ml glass vial. If the carbonate content is high, it is recommended to do it in a 500 ml flask previously, adding hydrogen peroxide to the sample before adding the acids and then transferring it after reducing it by heating to 20 ml. Let stand in a dark place for 15 days. Place on the Liquid Scintillation Analysis vials for determination <sup>210</sup>Pb in secular equilibrium with <sup>210</sup>Bi with LSC Hidex-Triathler. The C4 core was dated with <sup>210</sup>Pb to determine the Sedimentary Accumulation Rate (TAS) (Delanoy et al., 2020) at the site and thus be able to get an idea of how the sedimentation</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Coordinates of the cores taking places in the Port of Samana and its outside</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station Code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude (N)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude (O)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length core (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1851</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>regime has changed over time and how this has been related to human activities or extraordinary natural events that have influenced the sedimentation of the port of Samana (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>4) Normalization of the Calcium, Iron, PPI and <sup>210</sup>Pb values to compare their behavior</p><p>Normalized value is equal to the quotient of the measure between the highest values of all the measures of the considered variable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Minimum and maximum values of heavy metals determined in three cores taken inside the Port of Samana and one outside; and the toxicity threshold values and limits according to the SquiRTs-NOAA* and CCME* table, in marine sediment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >TEL* (&#181;g/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >PEL* (&#181;g/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Level Range in each Core (&#181;g/g )</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >C1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >C4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >549.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Level Range in each Core (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: *Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME); *National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); *Screening Quick Reference Tables (SquiRTs); *Threshold Effect Level (TEL); *Probable Effect Levels (PEL).</p><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Concentration levels of the main and trace elements in the surface sediments of nuclei C1, C2, C3 and C4. Port of Santa B&#225;rbara Samana in 2017</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Majority Elements (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Traces Elements (mg/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Core</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >182.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >C3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >91.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Heavy metals nickel exceeded the Threshold Toxicity Level (TEL) and the Limit Toxicity Level (PEL), according to the SQuiRTs table for marine sediment. This occurred in most sections of cores 1, 2 and 4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), taken inside the port; not so in core 3 which was mined outside the port and separated by the barrier of karst rocks. In the superficial sediments of the C1, C2 and C4 cores, Nickel exceeded the PEL value. Chromium except in core 3 in many of the sections of the other cores exceeded the PEL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), while in core 3 the values did not exceed TEL. Indicating that the karst rock barrier retains the spread of sediment (Cattani &amp; Lamour, 2016) and therefore of the chrome towards the bay of Samana, which are confined in the port. For the same reason, Copper, Zinc and Lead are in very low concentrations. Two of these heavy metals, Copper and Zinc, in the superficial sediments of the sampled points do not reach the TEL value; while lead was found close to its TEL value in cores C1, C2 and C4. As for the surface levels of Chromium only in core C4, this was determined above the PEL, the other sampling points barely approached the TEL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Cadmium was found in some sections and exceeded the TEL and PEL values, possibly due to its high solubility it can be dispersed through water. At the surface level, Cadmium exceeded cores to PEL except in core C3 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Mercury was found in some sections; could be as a result of maritime activities in the area or due to mobility during storm surges or human activities (Garc&#237;a, 1979). In the superficial sediments of the C3 and C4 cores, a higher concentration of mercury was found than the PEL; while in the C1 and C2 cores there was no presence. Arsenic, Copper and Zinc had values below TEL and PEL values in all cores; In other words, these three elements do not represent any contamination hazard in the port, much less on the outskirts near the port. The same happened in the superficial sediments. In general, it can be observed that the superficial sediments contained heavy metal levels below the maximum values determined, as determined in cores C1, C2, C3, these values were below the TEL. Fe and Ca concentration levels have opposite tendencies in cores 1, 2 and 4 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>); when one increases the other decreases. While in the core C3 both have the same tendency. These changes are related to temporary meteorological events (Delanoy et al., 2019).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Nickel levels in the Port of Samana are above toxicity levels according to the SQuiRTs table NOAA-USEPA and the CCME in marine sediments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). This element throughout the region in soil and sediment is generally found to be exceeding these values. Reason why we consider that it’s content in the sediments is not the product of polluting sources; therefore it is not possible to adopt a remediation measure in relation to this element. The surface sections of the C4 core contained Cadmium levels that exceeded the toxicity level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), the same step with the other cores. As for Chromium, the cores taken inside the port of Samana exceeded the levels of toxicity in most of the sections. In the core C3 taken outside the port, however, the levels did not exceed the TEL, indicating that this heavy metal originates from human activities. In other pollutants such as Arsenic, Copper and Zinc, their levels are below the TEL values, so the port of Samana does not require a remediation measure in relation to these trace elements. The presence of Mercury in some sections with values higher than the TEL and PEL refers to sporadic activities, since in the first 12 centimeters of the surface of the Core C4 it was only determined in one section and in the entire core in 4 sections; so it is not an element of concern. In the case of Lead, some values exceeded the TEL, reason for which it is necessary to take some surveillance measures to avoid its increase and reach the PEL. The major elements in the sediments of the Port of Samana can be considered normal since these are basically due to the mineralogical compositions of the rocks in the region. Heavy metal concentrations at the surface are generally below the maximum values of the cores; indicative of a recent improvement in the health of the ecosystem of the port of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana, compared to other episodes.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology. Autonomous University of Santo Domingo. FONDOCYT 2014-2B3-016 project.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts, which contributed to improving our manuscript. We also want to thank of the Dr. Pl&#225;cido G&#243;mez, Dr. Carlos Rodr&#237;guez, MsC. Miledy Alberto, Radham&#233;s Silverio and Master Idalia Acevedo for their institutional support; for financial support to Domingo Mercedes and Isabel Ulloa; Dr. Carlos M. Alonso Hern&#225;ndez, MsC. Zoraida Zapata, MsC. Miguel Gomez Batista, Lic. Marcos Casila, Osvaldo Su&#225;rez, Juan Pablo Gonz&#225;lez for their participation in the sampling; Msc. Nelphy de la Cruz, Yamileza Herrera, Queiroz Portorreal, Droniguiel Jim&#233;nez, Monica Medina y Rafaelina Vargas for participation in the preparation and analysis of the samples.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Delanoy, R., Asencio, M. D., &amp; Rodriguez, D. (2021). Geochemistry and Heavy Metal Levels in the Sediments of the Port of Santa B&#225;rbara de Samana, Dominican Republic. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 9, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.94012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.108738-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alonso-Hernández, C. M., Díaz-Asencio, M., Gómez-Batista, M., Bola&amp;#241;os-álvarez, Y., Mu&amp;#241;oz-Caravaca, A., &amp; Morera-Gómez, Y. (2016). Radiochronology of Marine Sediments and Its Application in the Understanding of Environmental Pollution Processes in Cuban Marine Ecosystems. Nucleus No. 60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311796266</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angeli, J. L. F., Kim, B. S. M., &amp; Paladino, I. M. (2020). Statistical Assessment of Background Levels for Metal Contamination from a Subtropical Estuarine System in the SW Atlantic (Paranaguá Estuarine System, Brazil). Journal of Sedimentary Environments, 5, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43217-020-00008-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Angulo</surname><given-names> R. J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Souza</surname><given-names> M. C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Lamour</surname><given-names> M. R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>. Coastal Erosion Problems Induced by Dredging Activities in the Navigation Channel of Paranaguá and S&amp;#227;o Francisco Do Sul Harbor, Southern Brazil</article-title><source> Journal of Coastal Research</source><volume> 39</volume>,<fpage> 1801</fpage>-<lpage>1803</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Appleby, P. G., &amp; Oldfield, F. (1978). The Calculation of Lead-210 Dates Assuming a Constant Rate of Supply of Unsupported 210Pb to the Sediment. Catena, 5, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(78)80002-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Binford, M. W., &amp; Brenner, M. (1986). Dilution of 210Pb by Organic Sedimentation in Lakes of Different Trophic States, and Application to Studies of Sediment-Water Interactions. Limnology and Oceanography, 31, 584-595. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.3.0584</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Birch, G. (2017). Determination of Sediment Metal Background Concentrations and Enrichment in Marine Environments. A Critical Review. Science of the Total Environment, 580, 813-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buchman, M. F. (2008). NOAA Screening Quick Reference Tables NOAA OR &amp; R Report 08-1 (34 p.). Seattle, WA: Office of Response and Restoration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cattani, P. E., &amp; Lamour, M. R. (2016). Consideration Regarding Sedimentation Rates along the E-W Axis of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Brazil: A Bathymetric Approach. Journal of Coastal Research, 32, 619-628. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00099.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Considine, D. B., Bergman, D. J., &amp; Liu, H. (2011). Sensitivity of Global Modeling Initiative Chemistry and Transport Model Simulations of Radon-222 and Lead-210 to Input Meteorological Data NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Hampton, VA: USA National Institute of Aerospace.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Delanoy, R., Diaz-Asencio, M., &amp; Mendez-Tejeda, R. (2019). Effect of Extreme Weather Events on the Sedimentation of the Bay of Samaná, Dominican Republic (1900-2016). Journal of Geography and Geology, 11, 56. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v11n3p56</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Delanoy, R., Diaz-Asencio, M., &amp; Mendez-Tejeda, R. (2020). Sedimentation in the Bay of Samana, Dominican Republic (1900-2016). AIMS Geosciences, 6, 298-315. http://www.aimspress.com/journal/geosciences https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eptisa SYSMIN Program (2004). Report of the Hydrogeological Unit of the Samana Peninsula.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Escuder-Viruete, J. (2008a). Geological Map of the Dominican Republic E. 1: 50,000, Santa Bárbara de Samana (6373-IV) (179 p.). Santo Domingo: General Mining Directorate.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Escuder-Viruete, J. (2008b). Petrology and Geochemistry of Metamorphic Igneous Rocks: Leaves from Las Galeras, Santa Bárbara de Samana and Sánchez. Complementary Report to the Geological Map of the Dominican Republic at E 1: 50,000 (79 p.). Santo Domingo: IGM-BRGM.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fukue, M., Yanai, M., Sato, Y., Fujikawa, T., Furukawa, Y., &amp; Tani, S. (2006). Background Values for Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, J. G. (1979). Compendio de Historia de Santo Domingo, editorial Santo Domingo, Tomo I y II.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaudette, H., Flight, W., Toner, L., &amp; Folger, D. (1974). An Inexpensive Titration Method for the Determination of Organic Carbon in Recent Sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 44, 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1306/74D729D7-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernaiz-Huerta, P. P. (2004). Geological Map of the Leaf to E. 1: 50.000 no 5871-I (The Discovery) and Corresponding Memory. Geothematic Mapping Project of the Dominican Republic. SYSMIN Program. General Directorate of Mining, Santo Domingo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IAEA (1992). Isotopes of Noble Gases as Tracers in Environmental Studies. Proceeding Consultants Meeting, Vienna, 29 May-2 June 1989, 261-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IAEA (2016). Coastal Sediment Radiochronology Using Pb-210: Models, Validation and Applications. Vienna: IAEA. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/IAEA_AQ-46_web.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landsea, C. W., &amp; Nicholls, N. (1996). Downward Trends in the Frequency of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes during the Past Five Decades. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 1697-1700. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loring, D. H., &amp; Rantala, R. T. T. (1992). Manual for the Geochemical Analyses of Marine Sediments and Suspended Particulate Matter. Earth-Science Reviews, 32, 235-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(92)90001-A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lozano, R. L., San Miguel, E. G., &amp; Bolívar, J. P. (2011). Assessment of the Influence of in Situ 210Bi in the Calculation of in Situ 210Po in Air Aerosols: Implications on Residence Time Calculations Using 210Po/210Pb Activity Ratios. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, D08206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014915</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marguí</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> González-Fernández</surname><given-names> O.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Hidalgo</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Pardini</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Queralt</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>. Application of the X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Technique in the Study of Metal Dispersion in Mining Areas</article-title><source> Geological and Mining Bulletin</source><volume> 122</volume>,<fpage> 273</fpage>-<lpage>286</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Meyers, P. A., &amp; Teranes, J. L. (2001). Sediment Organic Matter. In W. Last, &amp; J. P. Smol (Eds.), Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments (pp. 240-267). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mosqueda-Pe&amp;#241;a, F. (2010). Development of Procedures for the Determination of Radioisotopes in Environmental Samples Using Low-Count Techniques by Liquid Scintillation and Cerenkov Radiation. Doctoral Thesis, Huelva: University of Huelva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muramat, M., &amp; Evans, E. A. (1977). Radiotracer Techniques and Applications (Volume 2). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodríguez, A., Jiménez, A., &amp; Grau, A. (1996). Separation of 210Pb, 210Bi and 210Po by Means of an Ion Exchange Column and Its Calibration by Liquid Scintillation, CIEMAT.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodríguez-Vegas, E., Gascó-Leonarte, C., Schmid, T., Suárez, J. A., Rodríguez-Rastrero, M., &amp; Almorox-Alonso, J. (2013). Preliminary Study on the Use of 137Cs and 210Pb Radionuclides and Spectroradiometry Techniques as Tools to Determine the Erosion Status of Soils. http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/45/012/45012641.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rozanski, K., &amp; Gonfiantini, R. (2004). Isotopes in Climatological Studies. IAEA Bulletin, 4/1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruelas-Inzunza, J., Páez-Osuna, F., Ruiz-Fernández, A. C., &amp; Zamora-Arellano, N. (2011). Health Risk Associated to Dietary Intake of Mercury in Selected Coastal Areas of Mexico. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 86, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0189-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruiz-Fernández, A. C., &amp; Sánchez-Cabeza, J. A. (2009). Guide for the Use of Sediments in the Historical Reconstruction of Pollution in Coastal Areas. RLA/7/012 OIEA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Runnuw, R. (1999). Minerals and Mineraloids in Marine Sediments. An Optical Identification Guide (279 p.). New York: Elsevier.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salamanca</surname><given-names> M. A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>. Distribution and Accumulation of Lead in Sediments of the Fjords of the XI Region</article-title><source> Science and Technology of the Sea Journal</source><volume> 26</volume>,<fpage> 61</fpage>-<lpage>71</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sánchez-Cabeza, J. A., &amp; Ruiz-Fernández, A. C. (2012). 210Pb Sediment Radiochronology: An Integrated Formulation and Classification of Dating Models. Institut de Ciencia i Tecnologia Ambientals, and Department de Física, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Spain, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNEP/IOC/IAEA (1995). Manual for the Geochemical Analysis of Marine Sediments and Suspended Particulate Matter (74 p.). Reference Methods for Marine Pollution Studies No. 63, United Nations Environment Programme.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USAID-DSTA (2006). United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Terms of Cooperation Agreement No. 3714-03-CTS-01 (Dominican Alliance for Sustainable Tourism, USAID-DSTA) Implemented by the Academy for Educational Development and Partners.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108738-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valdés, J., Gui&amp;#241;ez, M., Castillo, A., &amp; Vega, S. E. (2014). Cu, Pb and Zn Content in Sediments and Benthic Organisms of San Jorge Bay (Northern Chile): Accumulation and Biotransference in Subtidal Coastal Systems. Ciencias Marinas, 40, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v40i1.2318</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>