<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2021.124040</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-108587</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Influence of Amino Acids on the Secondary Somatic Embryogenesis Proliferation Process of Moroccan Cork Oak (&lt;i&gt;Quercus suber&lt;/i&gt; L.)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naouar</surname><given-names>Ben Ali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lamarti</surname><given-names>Ahmad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of Tetouan, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetouan, Morocco</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>603</fpage><lpage>613</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present study aims to explore the regeneration potential of Moroccan cork oak through the secondary somatic embryogenesis process. Particularly, we focus on the analysis of amino acids influence on the quantity and quality 
  of the regenerated secondary embryos. The amino acids tested are: Gluta
  mine, 
  asparagine, arginine, tryptophane, methionine, casein hydrolysate and urea.
   Each amino acid is added in the Margara (N30K) medium at different concentra
  tions ranged between 10 and 500 mg/l. The results are collected after 2
   months of culture. First analysis shows that the glutamine and the casein hydrolysate 
  gives a maximum number of somatic embryos, clusters and pre-embryos
   newly formed on the clusters. By comparison to the control medium, the increase of 
  the secondary embryos number directly formed exceed 36% in the case of
   casein hydrolysate and 35% of in the case of glutamine both at the concentration of 30 mg/l. However, the test of the combination of these amino acids did not have any significant results. In terms of quality, the influence of amino acids on the morphology of secondary embryos was analyzed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Quercus suber&lt;/i&gt; L.</kwd><kwd> Secondary Embryos</kwd><kwd> Amino Acids</kwd><kwd> Glutamine</kwd><kwd> Asparagine</kwd><kwd> Casein Hydrolysat</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cork oak (Quercussuber L.) is considered one of the most important multipurpose species in all the Mediterranean area due to its ecological value as an environmental protector. Seed production and cork-derived industries have a major economic input into the maintenance of rural populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref1">1</xref>]. In the Moroccan cork oak forest ecosystem, the economic interest of this species has facilitated the development of new strategies for reforestation programs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref2">2</xref>]. However, conventional breeding of cork oak is constrained by its long reproductive cycle, which includes long juvenile phase, and its complex reproductive biology, including self-incompatibility and a high degree of heterozygosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>However, cloning of adult trees is still difficult, and in some species it is only possible at a juvenile phase because in most woody species, the selection of elite trees is only possible at the adult phase when individuals show their characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>The propagation through somatic embryogenesis (SE) is considered to be an important tool for obtaining efficient true to-type vegetative propagation of selected mature trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref6">6</xref>]. Within the genus Quercus, SE induction from mature trees has been reported in many Quercus species like: holm oak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref7">7</xref>] cork oak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref5">5</xref>], [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref8">8</xref>], and pedunculate oak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref11">11</xref>]. These studies were specifically focused on the embryos multiplication and conversion into plantlets, generally considered to be the most problematical stages limiting the use of SE for mass propagation, due to the low frequency of response [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>The secondary somatic embryogenesis (SE) is a phenomenon where by new somatic embryos are initiated from other somatic embryos. Some cultures are able to retain their competence for secondary SE for many years, and thus provide useful material for various studies, as described for Vitisrupestris [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref13">13</xref>], cork oak (Quercussuber) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref4">4</xref>]. Additionally, for some species, primary SE is less efficient than secondary SE, as reported for cork oak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref14">14</xref>]. Therefore, in plants with long life cycles, such as dicotyledonous woody plants, preserving embryogenic lines can be a cost-effective maintenance while those lines are being tested in field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>One of the most influential factors in the morphogenic response associated with secondary embryos culture is the kind and concentration of growth regulators. Amino acids serve as primary sources of organic nitrogen for the growth of many cells. They additionally promote communication between cells and tissues within multicellular organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref16">16</xref>]. Organic nitrogen nutrition was also reported to affect somatic embryogenesis in conifers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref7">7</xref>]. They have generally been used in the different phases of conifer somatic embryogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref17">17</xref>]. Glutamine and other aminoacids, can improve cell proliferation as well as regeneration in specific genotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>In this context, the objective of the present work is to study the effect of different sources, levels and balances of nitrogen on both induction and development of secondary SE from mature somatic embryos of Moroccan cork oak (Quercussuber L.).</p><p>Our work has been also devoted to study for the first time the secondary somatic embryogenesis process of Moroccan cork oak Quercussuber L. The objective was to explore the embryogenic potential through the secondary somatic embryogenesis process. This process is considered as an effective means for the mass propagation and maintenance of somatic embryos for micropropagation and its application to Moroccan cork oak. Mainly, we focus on the influence of amino acids on proliferation secondary somatic embryos.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>Mature embryos at the cotyledonal stage, of about 8 - 10 mm in size and approximate fresh weight of about 60 mg from somatic origin, were cultured in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes containing 20 ml of proliferation medium (N30K) and supplemented with different amino acids: glutamine (Gln), arginine (Arg), asparagine (Asn), m&#233;thionine (Met), tryptophan (Try), urea (Urea) and casein hydrolysate (CH) or a mixture of the All amino acids combinations. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with 28 treatments. All cultures were maintained in a constant ambient temperature of 25˚C &#177; 2˚C in darkness.</p><p>For this experiment, 30 explants somatic embryos were cultured per experimental unit in each of the 28 treatments (the control and seven amino acid treatments). All the somatic embryos were homogeneously distributed between treatments. The experiment was repeated three times, thus a total of 840 embryos was used.</p><p>Percentage of explants with secondary SE and number of viable clusters and somatic embryos on clusters per explants (primary somatic embryo) were recorded after 8 weeks in culture. The resulting data were submitted to a statistical package SPSS 17.0. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref22">22</xref>]. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to determine the differences between the treatments that produced cotyledonal somatic embryos. Multiple comparisons were made using Duncans post-hoc test (a = 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>The effect of amino acids concentration on ES proliferation is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The control medium is used as reference state. The results are collected after 8 weeks from the initiation of the culture and are presented in terms of average number of SSE formed per primary embryos, average number of clusters per primary embryos and average number of SSE newly formed on clusters.</p><p>In general, amino acids show a quite acceptable embryogenic response will compared to the control medium. A visual examination of secondary somatic embryos formed in the presence of Glu or HC shows a translucent aspect with normal morphology. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> illustrates some examples of embryos morphology obtained in the presence of amino acids. The increase in the number of secondary embryos exceeds 36% and 35% respectively in the case of casein hydrolyzate and glutamine respectively at the concentration of 30 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The response of the secondary somatic embryogenesis process differs depending on the type of amino acid used. The highest proliferation ratio of secondary somatic embryos (SSE) was obtained with the 30 mg/l of glutamine and 30 mg/l of CH respectively at 6.16 &#177; 0.48 and 6.2 &#177; 0.62 respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of treatment with different concentrations of amino acids on the secondary somatic embryogenesis process of Moroccan Quercus suber L</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >amino acid</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of SSE per primary SE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of clusters per primary SE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of SSE per cluster</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.53 &#177; 0.57 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.11 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73 &#177; 0.39 abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Glutamine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.63 &#177; 0.78 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.12 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63 &#177; 0.43 abcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.16 &#177; 0.48 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.11 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.83 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26 &#177; 0.75 abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.13 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 0.35 abcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Asparagine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93 &#177; 0.51 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.11 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23 &#177; 0.34 bcdefg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13 &#177; 0.63 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.09 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 &#177; 0.33 abcdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 &#177; 0.62 abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.10 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16 &#177; 0.36 bcdefg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Arginine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46 &#177; 0.55 cdef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.10 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76 &#177; 0.24 cdefg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97 &#177; 0.66 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.08 bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 &#177; 0.24 cdefg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47 &#177; 0.63 cdef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.08 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 &#177; 0.26 cdefg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Methionine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.51 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 &#177; 0.04 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 &#177; 0.13 f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.52 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.07 bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.18 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83 &#177; 0.31 fg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.08 bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.13 f</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Tryptophan</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4.26 &#177; 0.52 cde</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.07 bcd</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.57 &#177; 0.23 ef</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46 &#177; 0.62 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53 &#177; 0.09 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#177; 0.31 abcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.21 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.06 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.17 f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Urea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 &#177; 0.64 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.08 bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63 &#177; 0.22 def</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33 &#177; 0.54 abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.09 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.25 bcdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06 &#177; 0.44 ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.08 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 &#177; 0.23 cdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Casein Hydrolysat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67 &#177; 0.64 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.08 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93 &#177; 0.26 bcdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 &#177; 0.62 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.10 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 &#177; 0.51 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00 &#177; 0.45 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29 &#177; 0.07 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61 &#177; 1.12 ef</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Data were recorded after 8 weeks of culture, values are mean &#177; SE for three repeated experiments, each with three replicate Petri dishes and 3 embryogenic explants per plate. Within each embryogenic line and column, values with the same letter were not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (LSD test).</p><p>addition, clusters and secondary somatic embryos formed on the clusters had a similar proliferation ratio (0.6 &#177; 0.11 and 1.63 &#177; 0.83 respectively for clusters and SSE on clusters with Glu; 0.5 &#177; 0.10 and 1.67 &#177; 0.35 respectively for clusters and SSE on clusters with CH. It should be noted that the Glutamine is assimilated more rapidly into carbon skeletons of proteins than other inorganic nitrogen sources, and it is known to be an important amino acid in somatic embryogenesis of other species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>However, a lower proliferation ratio was obtained on the culture medium containing metheonine with a number of SSE that can not exceed 3.6 &#177; 0.52 followed by the arginine significant difference and the results remain in general quite acceptable.</p><p>On the other hand, results shows that the combinations of the different type of amino acid have not been satisfactory and the results remain without significance even if it exceeds sometimes the ratio of proliferation obtained in the case of the control medium (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In certain cases, we can observe that the induction of secondary somatic embryogenesis decrease significantly when the proliferation medium was supplemented with the combination of the aminoacids (0.9 &#177; 0.18) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The reported results show that the amino acids in general promote the multiplication and growth of embryos; this may be explained by the fact that these amino acids replace partially the NH4. Furthermore, they increase the levels of reduced nitrogen which stimulates the development of somatic embryos. Usually, the best embryogenic response can be obtained when the amino acids are added to the proliferation medium at moderated concentration (30 mg/l).</p><p>Embryo growth is a critical step for the development in vitro and germination</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of combination of different amino acids on the secondary somatic embryogenesis process of Moroccan Quercus suber L</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Combination of amino acid</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of SSE per primary SE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of clusters per primary SE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of SSE per cluster</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.53 &#177; 0.57 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.11 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73 &#177; 0.39 abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >COMB1: Glutamine + Asparagine + Arginine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 + 10 + 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.42 def</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.11 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46 &#177; 0.51 abcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 + 30 + 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63 &#177; 0.39 cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.07 bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57 &#177; 0.22 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 + 500 + 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.36 &#177; 0.48 bcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.08 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 &#177; 0.25 cdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >COMB2: Glutamine + Asparagine + Arginine + Methionine + Tryptophan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43 &#177; 0.39 abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.09 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 &#177; 0.28 abcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 + 30 + 30 + 30 + 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 &#177; 0.46 abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.09 abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 &#177; 0.28 bcdef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 + 500 + 500 + 500 + 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.18 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.09 abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.25 bcdef</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of somatic embryos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref23">23</xref>]. In this work, it is noted that the Amino acids activate the regeneration of the embryos. However, the need for amino acids in the culture medium depends also on the species; the explant or on the desired morphogenic response. Nevertheless, in some cases growth inhibition has been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref25">25</xref>]. Merkle et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref26">26</xref>] reported that the addition of amino acids to the culture medium might inhibit or promote the SE development and conversion. Von Arnold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref27">27</xref>] found a strong negative effect of L-glutamine, L-arginine, and L-asparagine on induction of somatic embryogenesis in P. abies. Kirby et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref28">28</xref>] reported that the addition of CH inhibited growth in cell suspension of Piceamenziesii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref19">19</xref>]. Smith [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref30">30</xref>] supplemented the maturation medium of Pinusradiata with a solution of seven amino acids, to improve somatic embryos production and plantlet recovery, and reported significant effects on somatic embryogenesis. In other plant species, such as Piceaglauca, some amino acids had either a negative or no effect on somatic embryo maturation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108587-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>Furthermore, our experiments show that the embryogenic response depends also on the type and the nature of the amino acid used. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> the arginine and the metheonine show some kind of inhibition against the proliferation of somatic embryos. Consequently, the poor response obtained in the case of the amino acids combination can be attributed in some measure to the presence of the arginine and the metheonine.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The obtained results showed that amino acids tend to favor the multiplication and growth of embryos, embryogenic response was quite acceptable. Compared to the control medium, secondary embryos increased beyond 36% in the case of casein hydrolyzate and 35% glutamine at a concentration of 30 mg/l. The lower rate of proliferation is obtained in the case of methionine followed by arginine, both show some kind of inhibition against the proliferation of somatic embryos.</p><p>However, tests on the combination of amino acids did not give satisfaction and results remain without significance. The establishment of histological study of secondary ultratsuctural cell and comparison batwing the content of amino acids and others plant hormones may improve the efficiency of Moroccan cork oak micropropagation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Fund</title><p>This research was partially funded by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology (Morocco) through project named “vegetative propagation of Moroccan cork oak with the technique of somatic embryogenesis”.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ben Ali, N. and Ahmad, L. (2021) Influence of Amino Acids on the Secondary Somatic Embryogenesis Proliferation Process of Moroccan Cork Oak (Quercussuber L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 603-613. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.124040</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Abbreviations</title><p>Arg—L-arginine;</p><p>Asn—L-asparagine;</p><p>CH—Casein hydrolyzate;</p><p>Cl—Clusters;</p><p>Gln—L-glutamine;</p><p>Met—Methionine;</p><p>SE—Somatic embryos, somatic embryogenesis;</p><p>SSE—Secondary somatic embryos, secondary somatic embryogenesis;</p><p>Try—Tryptophan.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.108587-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez, A., Manzanera, J.A. and Pintos, B. (2014) Embryogenesis in Oak Species. A Review. Forest Systems, 23, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014232-05829</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aafi, A., Achhal El Kadmiri, A., Benabid, A. and Rouchdi, M. (2005) Richesse et diversité floristique de la subéraie de la Mamora (Maroc). Acta Botanica Malacitana, 30, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.24310/abm.v30i0.7187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez, M., Bueno, M.A., Escalona, M., Toorop, P., Rodriguez, R. and Canal, M.J. (2013) Temporary Immersion Systems (RITA&lt;sup&gt;&amp;copy;&lt;/sup&gt;) for the Improvement of Cork Oak Somatic Embryogenic Culture Proliferation and Somatic Embryo Production. Trees, 27, 1277-1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0876-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, I., Celestino, C., Alegro, J. and Toribio, M. (2003) Vegetative Propagation of Quercus suber L. by Somatic Embryogenesis: II. Plant Regeneration from Selected Cork Oak Trees. Plant Cell Reports, 21, 765-770.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0604-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernández, S.I. (2007) Regeneración clonal de alcornoques adultos (Quercus suber L.) mediante embriogénesis somática. Tesis de doctoral, 1-241.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Capote, T., Usié, A., Barbosa, P., Ramos, M., Morais-Cecilio, L. and Goncalves, S. (2019) Transcriptome Dynamics of Corc Oak (Quercus suber) Somatic Embryogenesis Reveals Active Gene Players in Transcription Regulation and Phytohormone Homeostasis of Embryo Development. Tree Genetics &amp; Genomes, 15, 52.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1353-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez, M.T., San José, M.C., Vieitez, A.M., Cernadas, M.J. and Ballester, A. (2017) Prpagation of Mature Quercus ilex L. (Holm Oak) Trees by Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 131, 321-333.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1286-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, I., Cuenca, B., Carneros, E., Alonso-Blazquez, N., Ruiz, M., Celestino, C., Ocana, L., Alegre, J. and Toribio, M. (2011) Application of Plant Regeneration of Selected Cork Oak Trees by Somatic Embryogenesis to Implement Multivarietal Forestry for Cork Production. Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, 5, 19-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toribio, M., Fernandez, C., Celestino, C., Martinez, M.T., San-Jose, M.C. and Vieitez, A.M. (2004) Somatic Embryogenesis in Mature Quercus robur Trees. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 76, 283-287.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000009245.92828.26</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valladares, S., Sánchez, C., Martínez, M.T., Ballester, A. and Vieitez, A.M. (2006) Plant Regeneration through Somatic Embryogenesis from Tissues of Mature Oak Trees: True-to-Type Conformity of Plantlets by RAPD Analysis. Plant Cell Reports, 25, 879-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0108-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">San-José, M.C., Corredoira, E., Martinez, M.T., Vidal, N., Valladares, S., Mallon, R., Vieitez, A.M. (2010) Shoot Apex Explants for Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis in Mature Quercus robur L. Trees. Plant Cell Reports, 29, 661-671.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0852-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mallon, R., Covelo, P. and Vieitez, A.M. (2011) Improving Secondary Embryogenesis in Quercus robur: Application of Temporary Immersion for Mass Propagation. Trees, 26, 731-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0639-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinelli, L., Candioli, E., Costa, D. and Poletti, V. (2001) Morphogenic Competence of Vitis rupestris S. Secondary Somatic Embryos with a Long Culture History. Plant Cell Reports, 20, 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinto, G., Valentim, H., Costa, A., Castro, S. and Santos, C. (2002) Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Leaf Calli of Mature Quercus suber L. Plants. In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology—Plant, 6, 569-572.  
https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinto, G., Park, Y.S., Silva, S., Neves, L., Araujo, C. and Santos, C. (2008) Factors Affecting Maintenance, Proliferation, and Germination of Secondary Somatic Embryos of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Culture, 95, 69-78.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9417-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, B.G., Jack, D.L., Smith, D.W. and Saier, J.M.H. (1999) The Amino Acid/ Auxin: Proton Symport Permease Family. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1415, 306-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00196-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garin, E., Bernier-Cardou, M., Isabel, N., Klimaszewska, K. and Plourde, A. (2000) Effect of Sugars, Amino Acids, and Culture Technique on Maturation of Somatic Embryos of Pinus strobus on Medium with Two Gellan Gum Concentrations. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 62, 27-37.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006402215457</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corredoira, E., Valladares, S., Vieitez, A.M. and Ballester, A. (2008) Improved Germination of Somatic Embryos and Plant Recovery of European Chestnut. In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology—Plant, 44, 307-315.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9105-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, Y.W., Newton, R., Frampton, J. and Han, K.-H. (2008) Embryogenic Tissue Initiation and Somatic Embryogenesis in Fraser Fir (Abies fraseir (Pursh) Poir.). In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology—Plant, 45, 400-406.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9169-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martínez, M.T., Corredoira, E., Valladares, S., Jorquera, L. and Vieitez, A.M. (2008) Germination and Conversion of Somatic Embryos Derived from Mature Quercus robur Trees: The Effects of Cold Storage and Thidiazuron. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 95, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9448-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Corredoira, E., Toribio, M. and Vieitez, E. (2014) Clonal Propagation via Somatic Embryogenesis in Quercus spp. In: Ramawhat, K.G., Mérillon, J.M. and Ahuja, M.R., Eds., Tree Biotechnology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 262-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SPSS for Windows (2010) Guia Breve de IBM SPSS Statistics 19.SPSS Inc. IBM Company, Chicago, 171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pintos, B., Manzanera, J.A. and Bueno, M.A. (2010) Oak Somatic and Gametic Embryos Maturation Is Affected by Charcoal and Specific Amino Acids Mixture. Annals of Forest Science, 67, 205. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fridborg, G. and Eriksson, T. (1975) Effects of Activated Charcoal on Growth and Morphogenesis in Cell Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 34, 306-308.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1975.tb03843.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fridborg, G., Pedersen, L., Landstrom, E. and Eriksson, T. (1978) The Effect of Activated Charcoal on Tissue Cultures: Adsorption of Metabolites Inhibiting Morphogenesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 43, 104-106.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01575.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Merkle</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Strategies for Dealing with Limitations of Somatic Embryogenesis in Hardwood Trees</article-title><source> Plant Tissue Culture Biotechnology</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 112</fpage>-<lpage>121</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Von Arnold, S. (1987) Improved Efficiency of Somatic Embryogenesis in Mature Embryos of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Journal of Plant Physiology, 128, 233-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(87)80237-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kirby, E.G., Leustek, T. and Lee, M.S. (1987) Nitrogen Nutrition. In: Bonga, J.M. and Durzan, D.J., Eds., General Principles and Biotechnology, Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, Vol. 1, Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 67-88.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0994-1_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, D.R. (1994) Growth Medium for Plant Embryogenic Tissue. Australia Canada Patent #PM5232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Smith</surname><given-names> D.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>The Role of in Vitro Methods in Pine Plantation Establishment: The Lesson from New Zealand</article-title><source> Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 63</fpage>-<lpage>73</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stuart, D.A., Nelsen, J., MC Call, C.M., Strickland, S. and Walker, K.A. (1985) Physiology of the Development of Somatic Embryos in Cell Cultures of Alfalfa and Celery. In: Zaitlin, M., Day, P. and Hollaender, A., Eds., Bio-Technology in Plant Science, Academic Press, New York, 35-47.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775310-2.50009-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108587-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barrett, J.D., Park, Y.S. and Bonga, J.M. (1997) The Effectiveness of Various Nitrogen Sources in White Spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports, 16, 411-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050250</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>