<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2021.124024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-108488</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  In &lt;i&gt;Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Clonal Propagation from Adult Material of a Savannah Species of Socio-Economic Importance: &lt;i&gt;Annona senegalensis&lt;/i&gt; Pers.
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oumar</surname><given-names>Ba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abraham</surname><given-names>Diémé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mame</surname><given-names>Ourèye Sy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire Campus de Biotechnologies Végétales, Département de Biologie Végétale, Faculté des Sciences &amp;amp; Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>370</fpage><lpage>386</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <em>Annona senegalensis</em> (Pers.) or Annone from Senegal is a species found in the West African savannah and para-littoral sands. It offers real possibilities of socio-economic use, particularly in the medical, nutritional, ecosystem conservation and poverty alleviation fields. However, this wild species remained not fully exploited despite its potentialities. As a result, there is a need to regenerate this species; therefore, the
  <em> in vitro</em> propagation from adult material was undertaken. For this purpose, axillary nodes from plant regrowth taken from elderly subjects were aseptically introduced into different media enriched or not with phytohormones. Among the 3 culture media tested, that of Murashige and Skoog (MS, 1962) was the most reactive and made it possible to develop a micropropagation protocol for adult material of 
  <em>A. senegalensis</em>. Thus, the introduction of these explants in media containing cytokinins (BAP and Kinetin) significantly increased the reactivity compared to media without hormones. If the best average numbers of shoots (2.3) and nodes (5.3) are obtained in MS + BAP 2 mg
  &amp;#903;L
  <sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup>, with a reactivity of 91.66%, the addition of 0.1 mg
  &amp;#903;L
  <sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup> NAA gave the best average length (8.25 cm) of vitroplants. An induction time of 3 days into darkness with IBA at 50 mg
  &amp;#903;L
  <sup>&amp;#8722;1</sup>, followed by a transfer to hormone-free expression medium (MS/2) under light, resulted in a rooting rate of 58.33%. After the gradual weaning of the young plants in a mini-greenhouse, under shade for 3 weeks, 50% of the plants survived. This 
  <em>in vitro</em> regeneration protocol can therefore be adopted for the clonal propagation of adult material of 
  <em>A. senegalensis</em>. However, the rooting rate can be improved by trying other hormonal combinations based on auxins or by considering 
  <em>ex</em>-
  <em>vitro</em> rooting during shade weaning.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Annona senegalensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Adult Material</kwd><kwd> Micropropagation</kwd><kwd> 6-Benzylaminopurine</kwd><kwd> 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid</kwd><kwd> Indole-3-Butyric Acid</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Annonasenegalensis or Annone from Senegal, and commonly known as African custard-apple [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref1">1</xref>], wild custard apple or wild soursop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref2">2</xref>] is a species of Annonaceae found in the wild in the undergrowth of Sudanese tree savannas as well as in the para-littoral sands of West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref3">3</xref>]. It is native to tropical east and northeast, west and west-central, and southern Africa, as well as southern subtropical Africa, and islands in the western Indian Ocean. Annona senegalensis takes the form of either a shrub or small tree that can sometimes reach six meters high. It is a species of great socio-economic and pharmacological importance. Its fleshy fruit is edible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref6">6</xref>] and is highly prized by local populations, while its leaves, bark and roots are widely used in traditional medicine to treat many diseases such as skin diseases, diarrhea, malaria, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref9">9</xref>]. More recently, it has been proven that essential oils extracted from the leaves of A. senegalensis would contain substances used as a source of potential human cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref10">10</xref>]. However, despite the many uses and opportunities it offers, this species is not being fully exploited. Indeed, A. senegalensis always remains in the wild. Unfortunately, the degradation of ecosystems in general due to climate change and factors such as drought, bush fires, overexploitation of plant resources, demographic pressure and the aging of natural populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref13">13</xref>] means that this species, like most Sahelian species, is highly threatened. The frequency of natural regeneration is insufficient to ensure its sustainability and development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref14">14</xref>], hence the need to resort to artificial technical methods to overcome this constraint [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref15">15</xref>]. The biotechnological methods widely used in many laboratories would allow mass production of good quality plants to be made available to foresters, local populations and other operators. This would even allow for industrial-scale exploitation of this species.</p><p>In this context, the study was carried out in order to contribute to the renewal of the genetic resource by in vitro vegetative propagation method of adult material i.e. clonal micropropagation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Micropropagation</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Plant Material</title><p>The plant material used consists of axillary nodes from plant regrowth taken from elderly subjects. To do this, adult Annona plants located in the botanical garden of the Plant Biology department were copped in the dry season (mid-March). This period corresponds to the budding phase of adult trees. Twenty days after pruning the plants, the young regrowth appearing on the branches was removed and used as explants.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Disinfection Procedure and Establishment of Aseptic Culture</title><p>After sampling, the plant material is cut into nodal segments of approximately 12 cm and disinfected according to the procedure mentioned in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.1.3. Culture Media and Growth Regulators</title><p>Three basic hormone-free nutrient media were used. These were complete medium of Murashige &amp; Skoog [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref16">16</xref>], Murashige &amp; Skoog modified medium (MMS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref17">17</xref>] and Woody Plant Medium medium (WPM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref18">18</xref>]. These media contained 2</p><p>g·L<sup>−1</sup> of activated charcoal, 30 g·L<sup>−1</sup> of sucrose, and were solidified with agar (8 g·L<sup>−1</sup>) after adjusting the pH to 5.7.</p><p>The sampled nodal segments were aseptically introduced in vitro, after disinfection, in these various culture media containing or not variable concentrations of cytokinins (BAP, Kinetin) and auxin (NAA) at variable concentrations. The different concentrations of growth regulators used to screen their effects on the in vitro regeneration of explants are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. These were: cytokinins, among which BAP and Kinetin, tested at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> and auxins in the form of NAA at concentrations of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>. Due to the presence of activated charcoal (2 g·L<sup>−1</sup>), which tends to adsorb both the exudates of polyphenols and phytohormones, the hormonal concentrations were multiplied by a factor of 10 in order to benefit from their effect. The different phytohormones used were added directly to the basal media before distribution in cultures tubes and autoclaving at 110˚C for 20 min.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_4"><title>2.1.4. Experimental Setup</title><p>The explants were individually introduced into glass culture tubes (25 &#215; 150 mm), filled up with 20 mL of a garified medium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), with a number of 24 explants per medium. They were first incubated in the dark for 5 days. They</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the different media used for the multiplication of adult material of Annonasenegalensis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nomenclature of in vitro culture media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hormonal combinations</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 4 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 4 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MS: Murashige &amp; Skoog medium (1962); BAP: 6-Benzylaminopurine; KIN: Kinetin (6-furfuryl aminopurine); NAA: 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid.</p><p>were subsequently transferred to a culture chamber at 27˚C &#177; 1˚C under a photoperiod of 16 h day/8 h night, with a photosynthetically active incident light (PAR) of 4000 Lux.</p><p>The newly formed shoots in vitro were transplanted into the new media after 30 days of incubation.</p><p>The parameters measured concern the presence or absence of resumption of activity [Reactivity (%) = (Number of explants having reacted/Total number of explants) &#215; 100], the number and length of newly formed shoots, the number of nodes. Thus, from these data, averages were calculated, the coefficients or multiplication rates determined and the best media deduced.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_5"><title>2.1.5. Rooting Procedure</title><p>Third generation of shoots, i.e. from three successive transplants lasting thirty days each, were introduced for 15 days into the solid MS medium without hormones, with a concentration of 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of activated charcoal and 20 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of sucrose, according to the method used by Farooq et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref19">19</xref>] on Annonasquamosa and which facilitates rhizogenesis. The explants were then introduced into MS/2 medium containing concentrations of 25 or 50 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of IAA or IBA. During the rhizogenic induction phase, the vitroplants were placed in the dark for a duration of 1, 3 and 5 days and then transferred to the light in the MS/2(0) hormone-free expression medium, with the macro-nutrients diluted by half.</p><p>For each treatment, a number of 12 explants were used for each duration and for each induction medium. A batch of explants is maintained as a control one, without root induction, in the MS/2 i.e. hormone-free medium. Media containing 2 g·L<sup>−1</sup> of activated charcoal and 20 g·L<sup>−1</sup> of sucrose were solidified with an 8 g·L<sup>−1</sup> agar and the pH was adjusted to 5.7.</p><p>After 30 days of incubation, measurements were taken to determine the rooting rate [(Number of rooted explants/total number of explants) &#215; 100], the number of newly formed roots per explant and the root length for each explant, for each treatment.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Acclimatization</title><p>The plants produced in vitro, well rooted, were transferred under a shade for acclimatization. For this, they were removed from the tubes and freed from the agar by washing their base with sterile distilled water and then transplanted into a substrate made up of a mixture of sand and potting soil (v/v), previously sterilized. The substrate was potted in black polyethylene bags. Two weaning conditions were tested:</p><p>- A batch (1) of 12 young plants was placed in the shade for 2 days then transferred over the bench to the light;</p><p>- A second batch (2) of 12 young plants was placed in a mini-greenhouse with a transparent plastic cover with adjustable opening. Thus, the plants were maintained in conditions of relatively high humidity. They were watered with the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref20">20</xref>] nutritive solution every two days. After the 2<sup>nd</sup> week, the plastic cover was opened gradually.</p><p>The number of plants that survived after 15 and 30 days of acclimatization was used to determine the survival or recovery rate.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Micropropagation</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Plant Material</title><p>After 30 days of incubation, 12.5% of the nodal explants were infected. The first infections appeared 3 days after introduction. In addition, 7 to 10 days after the introduction of the material, the outlines of newly formed shoots began to appear at the level of the leaf insertion zone of the nodes. The hormone-enriched media gave the best results in terms of number of regrowth and explant reactivity. Newly formed shoots were more numerous and appeared earlier in these hormone-enriched media. For that species, the presence of calluses was noticed in the areas of the injury of the explants when the concentration of cytokinins or of NAA is high (5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> and 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>), respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Culture Media</title><p>The media of Murashige &amp; Skoog [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref16">16</xref>], Murashige &amp; Skoog modified (MMS, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref17">17</xref>] ) and Woody Plant Medium (WPM, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref18">18</xref>] ) used alone (without hormones) made it possible to have the results mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. After 30 days of culture, the best reactivity rate (number of cuttings reacted relative to the number of cuttings introduced) was obtained in MS medium (83%).</p><p>An average number of 1.32 shoots was obtained in MS medium against 1.06 in MMS medium and 1 in WPM medium (F = 373.48; p ≤ 0.001). The average lengths (F = 373.48; p ≤ 0.001) and the average number of nodes (F = 537.46; p ≤ 0.001) are significantly different. They are 2.35, 1.74 and 2.1 cm for the MS, MMS and WPM media, respectively, with an average of, 2.85, 3.03 and 2.76 nodes per explant. These values also were significantly different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Thus, the medium of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref16">16</xref>], being the best medium, was used as the basal medium for the in vitro propagation.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Influence of 3 different types of media on the in vitro morphogenesis of Annonasenegalensis nodal segments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Responsiveness rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of shoots</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average shoot length (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of nodes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76 c</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the same column, the values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% threshold of the Newman-Keuls’s test. MS: Murashige &amp; Skoog medium; MMS: Murashige &amp; Skoog Modified medium; WPM: Woody Plant Medium.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Influence of Growth Regulators Used Alone or in Combination</title><p>The addition of hormones to the basal medium significantly improved the reactivity, multiplication and elongation of the nodal explants. The M3 medium [MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>] gave the best reactivity rate (91.66%) and the best multiplication rate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In this medium, the explants gave the highest average</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Influence of different hormonal combinations on the in vitro morphogenesis of Annonasenegalensis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hormonal Combinations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Responsiveness Rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of shoots</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average length of shoots (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of nodes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85 ef</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.65 abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 4 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57 cde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21 def</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.69 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95 bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31 abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 4 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10 bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + KIN 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86 bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27 abcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90 bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + KIN 1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.68 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38 abcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.25 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 cd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + NAA 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44 f</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the same column, the values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% threshold of the Newman-Keuls’s test. MS: Murashige &amp; Skoog medium; BAP: 6-Benzylaminopurine; KIN: Kinetin (6-furfuryl aminopurine); NAA: 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid.</p><p>number of newly formed shoots (2.3) and the highest average number of nodes (5.3). These values are significantly higher than those obtained with the control one (M0), i.e. 2.85 (F = 7.01; p ≤ 0.001) and 1.32 (F = 5.05; p ≤ 0.001), respectively. However, the addition of the hormonal combination M14 [MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + 0.1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of NAA] to M3 resulted in a significant increase in the average shoot length equivalent to 8.25 cm. Indeed, the average shoot length in the M14 medium and is significantly longer than those obtained in MS0 and M3, i.e. 2.35 cm (p ≤ 0.001) and 6.7 cm (p = 0.01), respectively.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Rooting</title><p>For a 5-day induction with IBA at 50 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>, no roots appeared at the base of the vitroplants in the expression medium after 30 days of culture. In addition, significant callogenesis was noticed (100%) as well as rooting (33.33%). The best rooting rate (58.33%) was obtained for an induction period of 3 days with IBA (50 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>) whereas for the control, this rate was 8.33% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). For</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Influence of IAA and IBA on the in vitro rooting of Annonasenegalensis vitroplants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of Hormones</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of Induction (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rooting Rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of roots</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average length of roots (cm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >IAA 50 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >IBA 50 mg·L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 c</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the same column, the values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% threshold of the Newman-Keuls’s test. IAA: Indole-3-acetic acid; IBA: Indole-3-butyric acid.</p><p>the 3-day induction period with IBA, the average number of roots is 2.2, a value significantly higher (p = 0.016) than those obtained with the other induction times.</p><p>For the length of the roots, the analysis of variances reveals a very significant medium effect (F = 30.20; p ≤ 0.001). For an induction period of 1 day with IAA, the average length of the roots is equal to 3.75 cm, a value not significantly different from the results which are higher than the elongations obtained with the other induction periods, particularly, that with IBA (1 day-induction period) with which, an average root length of 2.38 cm was noticed (p = 0.36). The lowest root elongation at 1.8 cm was observed with the control plants. For an IAA induction period of 3 days, the mean length of the vitroplants is 3.56 cm (p = 0.004). a value significantly different from those noticed with IAA (5 days) and IBA (1 day), i.e. root lengths of 2.4 cm (p ≤ 0.001) and 2.5 cm (p = 0.009), respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Acclimatization</title><p>The results recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> revealed that only 2 explants (25%) installed directly under the bench in the shade room survived after 15 days. Indeed, 3 days after the start of the ex vitro weaning, the leaves of most young plants begin to necrose. After 15 days of weaning, the survival rate for the young plants of batch 2 is equal to 50%. After partial opening of the plastic sheeting, the young plants behave well. After 30 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), the survival rate remained unchanged.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Survival rate, after 15 and 30 days of ex vitro weaning, of young plants from adult material of Annonasenegalensis Pers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Survival Rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >After 15 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >After 30 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Lot 1: young plants kept directly in the shade in the greenhouse, and then on the bench. Lot 2: young plants kept in a mini-greenhouse, then under natural conditions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Disinfection</title><p>Double disinfection with mercuric chloride and then with bleach was very beneficial for the disinfection of nodal explants, with a low infection rate i.e. 12.5%). These results are consistent with those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref21">21</xref>] for Atriplexhalimus. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref22">22</xref>], depending on the origin of the explants, two methods are conventionally used: disinfection with mercuric chloride, generally used for potentially infected material, and disinfection with calcium hypochlorite. Several researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref26">26</xref>] ) used the first method to disinfect explants of Jatrophacurcas originating from greenhouses, nurseries or fields or nodal explants of Tectonagrandis, a woody tree [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref27">27</xref>].</p><p>In addition, a high level of mercuric chloride at 1% on Atriplexhalimus micro-cuttings, taken from woody mother-plants aged 30 years, allowed to obtain a high survival rate of 85% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref29">29</xref>]. Ultimately, it emerges that the effectiveness of the disinfectant product, HgCl<sub>2</sub>, would be linked to the inherent factors of the plant, namely the age, the species considered, the diameter and size of the explants and other parameters such as the optimal dose of the disinfectant and the immersion time. The optimum dose of mercuric chloride to be applied is also decisive to avoid the toxicity and the lethality of the disinfectant on the reactivity of the explants.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Micropropagation</title><p>The base medium of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref16">16</xref>] provided the best reactivity rates. In terms of the highest average number of shoots and the best elongation, the best results were obtained with hormone-free environments. These results show that these media allow better multiplication in this species. The medium of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref16">16</xref>] is one of the most widely used media for the in vitro vegetative propagation of plant species, especially in numerous studies of the Annona genus. This is how it was used, e.g. by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref31">31</xref>] in A. Cherimola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref32">32</xref>] in A. muricata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref33">33</xref>], in the hybrid species, A. cherimoya cv (A. cherimola &#215; A. squamosa) or [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref34">34</xref>] in A. glabra. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref19">19</xref>] used this medium to in vitro multiply A. squamosa in accordance with the results obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref35">35</xref>]. On the other hand, Woody Plant Medium (WPM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref18">18</xref>] is an increasingly used medium for the in vitro vegetative propagation of fruit essences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>Overall, the nodal explants reacted better in media with hormones than in the control one. The MS medium supplemented with 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of BAP led to the best reactivity rate (91.66%), the greatest average number of newly formed shoots (2.3) and the greatest number of nodes (5.3). The M14 medium [MS + BAP 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> + ANA 0.1 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>] made it possible to have better elongation of the shoots (8.25 cm). Thus, BAP used alone had a better effect on explant bursting but rather had a detrimental effect on the elongation and the average number of nodes when the concentration is high (4 and 5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>). A concentration of 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of NAA decreases considerably the multiplication rate, the length of shoots as well as the average number of nodes. Adding low concentrations of NAA to the culture medium increased significantly the number of newly formed shoots in A. cherimola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref36">36</xref>], Atriplexhalimus L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref21">21</xref>] and Pisumsativum L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref37">37</xref>]. In Annonaglabra, the best average lengths were obtained by using the concentration of 0.5 mg·L<sup>–1</sup> of BAP while higher concentrations (1 and 1.5 mg·L<sup>–1</sup>) of this phytohormone induced a reduction in shoot length [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref34">34</xref>]. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref21">21</xref>], the addition of BAP improves the rate of bud break and the mean number of axillary shoots increases with decreasing BAP concentration. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref38">38</xref>] reported that cytokinins begin to have an adverse effect on organogenesis when their concentration is greater than 2 mg·L<sup>–1</sup>. Working on Atriplexhalimus, a sylvo-pastoral shrub species of the Chenopodiaceae family, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref28">28</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref21">21</xref>] showed that BAP increases the propensity to bud in this species, as well as the presence of several buds in a leaf axilla. This phenomenon has also been observed in vitro in Acacia cyanophylla [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref39">39</xref>] and Annonasquamosa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref40">40</xref>]. However, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref41">41</xref>], high concentrations of cytokinins generally favor the production of large numbers of cuttings. Thus, the use of BAP concentrations at 2 and 4 mg·L<sup>–1</sup> has been shown to significantly increase the number of cuttings produced from explants of A. muricata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref42">42</xref>]. Thus, in Annonaglabra, the low concentrations of BAP, less than 0.5 mg·L<sup>–1</sup>, are insufficient to induce a significant increase in multiplication rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>In some cases, the hormonal combination of BAP-NAA has been shown to be harmful to the in vitro organogenesis of plant species. This is the case with Solanumsessiliflorum in which the combination of BAP (0.25 and 0.5 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>), and NAA (0.1 and 0.3 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>) did not have a beneficial effect on in vitro multiplication according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref43">43</xref>]. Thus, some authors recommend the use, instead of NAA, of other auxins such as IAA or IBA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref45">45</xref>]. With Macluratinctoria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref46">46</xref>] and Nothofagusalpina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref47">47</xref>], adding NAA to the medium that already contained GA<sub>3</sub> combined with BAP did not improve the multiplication rate.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Rooting</title><p>The traditional methods of vegetative propagation were inefficient, due to the low morphogenetic potential of A. senegalensis, and the low rooting rate of its conventional cuttings. The micropropagation technique can be applied successfully to this species and other Annona sp. to overcome these problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref50">50</xref>].</p><p>During the in vitro rooting stage, a rooting rate of 8.33% is obtained in the MS/2(0) expression medium without prior induction with auxins. This could be explained by a high endogenous auxin level in this species. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref51">51</xref>] made the same observation with Parkiabiglobosa. It could also be explained by a drop in the pH in the medium due to a decrease in the concentration of sucrose. Indeed, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref52">52</xref>], the level of sucrose in the culture medium 4 weeks after cultivation decreases from 20 mg·L<sup>–1</sup> to 5 mg·L<sup>–1</sup> while the medium becomes more acid with a pH decrease from 5.7 to 5.0. In many Annonaspecies such as A. glabra, this drop in pH allows a better response to root formation by increasing the percentage of rooting and the average number of roots produced by vitroplants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref34">34</xref>]. However, a 5.0 pH of the medium has a negative effect on root length when the auxin concentration or the induction time is high, which would explain the decrease in root length as the induction time increases. IBA had a better effect on the rooting rate and on the average number of roots. Many authors have reported that an induction period of 3 to 5 days in the dark and then 7 to 10 days in full light in a medium containing a concentration of IBA of 50 to 100 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> with 2 - 2.5 g·L<sup>−1</sup> of activated charcoal and 20 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of sucrose, followed by transfer to the MS/2(0) expression medium led to good rooting of shoots from mature material in many plants as well as for Annonaceaespecies. This is the case with Annonacherimola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref49">49</xref>] to attempt the plant breeding of this species and A. atemoya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref33">33</xref>]. This relative efficacy of IBA compared to other auxins has been observed in other fruit tree species such as Guava sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref53">53</xref>]. Adversely, for A. muricata vitroplants, rooting was stimulated by galactose and NAA, after explants were preconditioned for two weeks, in a plain medium containing 10 g·L<sup>−1</sup> of activated charcoal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref42">42</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Acclimatization</title><p>The weaning of young plants by direct transfer to the atmosphere of the shade house resulted in high mortality. This result is explained by the very high relative humidity inside the culture tubes during in vitro culture. Indeed, under these conditions, the leaves of young plants have a high number of stomata compared to those of adult plants adapted to in vivo conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref57">57</xref>]. Adding to this are the combined effects of the presence of sucrose in the medium and the accumulation of ethylene, which negatively impact the development and closing capacity of the stomata once the young plants are subjected to natural conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref59">59</xref>]. According to other authors, this high frequency of stomata and their poor closing capacity are the cause of the desiccation of young plants after their transfer to natural weaning conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref59">59</xref>] when relative humidity drops rapidly. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108488-ref60">60</xref>] noticed this phenomenon in A. glabra.</p><p>On the other hand, gradual weaning results in fairly high survival rates. In fact, as has been observed for the juvenile material, keeping the young plants in a mini-greenhouse before their transfer under natural conditions makes it possible to maintain the explants under conditions close to those in vitro,i.e. very high relative humidity conditions, which lead to saturation of the atmosphere, hence to the protection of leaf surfaces of plants not yet fully adapted to natural conditions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This work made it possible to develop an effective disinfection protocol for the disinfection of adult material before in vitro introduction. It also demonstrated that MS medium was the best culture medium for clonal propagation. It provided the best reactivity and elongation rates. The MS medium supplemented with 2 mg·L<sup>−1</sup> of BAP led to the best reactivity rate, the greatest average number of newly formed shoots and the greatest number of nodes. The M14 medium made it possible to have better elongation of the shoots. Thus, BAP used alone had a better effect on explant bursting but the BAP combined with NAA helped improve the multiplication rate of explants. IBA had a better effect on the rooting rate and on the average number of roots. Gradual weaning of plants, during acclimatization results in fairly high survival rates. It would be interesting to consider direct organogenesis for the clonal propagation of Annonasenegalensis to have higher multiplication rate.</p><p>This in vitro regeneration protocol can therefore be adopted for the clonal propagation of adult material of A. senegalensis. However, the rooting rate can also be improved by trying other hormonal combinations based on auxins or by considering ex-vitro rooting during shade weaning or by micrografting techniques.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to Prof Oumar KA for proofreading the manuscript in English version.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ba, O., Di&#233;m&#233;, A. and Sy, M.O. (2021) In Vitro Clonal Propagation from Adult Material of a Savannah Species of Socio-Economic Importance: Annonasenegalensis Pers.. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 370-386. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2021.124024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.108488-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deccetti, S.F.C., Soares, A.M., Paiva, R. and de Castro, E.M. (2008) Effect of the Culture Environment on Stomatal Features, Epidermal Cells and Water Loss of Micropropagated Annona glabra L. Plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 117, 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.05.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diáz-Pérez, J.C., Shackel, K.A. and Sutter, E.G. (1995) Effects of in Vitro-Formed Roots and Acclimatization on Water Status and Gas Exchange of Tissue-Cultured Apple Shoots. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 20, 435-440. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.120.3.435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shackel, K.A., Novello, V. and Sutter, E.G. (1990) Stomatal Function and Cuticular Conductance in Whole Tissue-Cultured Apple Shoots. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 115, 468-472. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.115.3.468</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, P.S.V., Kozai, T., Nguyen, Q.T., Kubota, C. and Dhawan, V. (2003) Growth and Water Relations of Paulownia fortunei under Photomixotrophic and Photoautotrophic Conditions. Biologia Plantarum, 46, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022844720795</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sciutti, R. and Morini, S. (1995) Water Loss and Photosynthesis of Plum Plantlets Is Influenced by Relative Humidity during Rooting in Vitro. Journal of Horticultural Science, 70, 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1995.11515291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, N., Wetzstein, H.Y. and Sommer, H.E. (1988) Quantum Flux Density Effects on the Anatomy and Surface Morpholology of In Vitro- and In Vivo-Developed Sweetgum Leaves. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 113, 167-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brainerd, K.E. and Fuchigami, L.H. (1981) Acclimatization of Aseptically Cultured Apple Plants to Low Relative Humidity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 106, 515-518.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amin, M.N. and Jaiswal, V.S. (1987) Rapid Clonal Propagation of Guava Trough in Vitro Shoot Proliferation on Nodal Explants of Mature Trees. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 9, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040809</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lemos, E.E.P. and Baker, D.A. (1998) Shoot Regeneration in Response to Carbon Source on Internodal Explants of Annona muricata L. Plant Growth Regulation, Dordrecht, 25, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006058301707</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sambe, M.A.N., Sagna, M. and Sy, M.O. (2010) Seed Germination and in Vitro Plant Regeneration of Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) Benth. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 3099-3108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira, G., De-La-Cruz-Chacón, I., Boaro, C.S.F., Baron, D. and Pinto de Lemos, E.E. (2019) Propagation of Annonaceous Plants. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura Jaboticabal, 41, 14 p. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452019500</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Encina, C.L., Martin, E.C., Lopez, A.A. and Padilla, I.M.G. (2014) Biotechnology Applied to Annona Species: A Review. Vol. 36, Edi&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o especial, 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452014000500002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Encina, C.L., Barcelo-Munhoz, A., Herrero-Castano, A. and Pliego-Alfaro, F. (1994) In Vitro Morphogenesis of Juvenile Annona cherimola Mill. Bud Explants. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 69, 1053-1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1994.11516544</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jordan, M., Velozo, J. and Sabja, A.M. (1996) Organogenesis in Vitro of Nothofagus alpina (P. et E.) Oerst., Fagaceae. Pant Cell Reports, 15, 792-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232232</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomes, G.A.C. (1999) Propaga&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o in Vitro de moreira (Maclura tinctoria). UFLA, Disserta&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o, Lavras, Brasil, 91 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordeiro, A.R. and Mattos, N.O. (1991) In Vitro Regeneration of Several Accessions of Solanum topiro Humb. &amp; Blonp., and S. sessiliforum Dun. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 26, 1931-1936.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hendrix, R.C., Litz, R.E. and Kirchoff, B.K. (1987) In Vitro Organogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Leaves of Solanum Candidum Lindl., S. quitosense Lam. (naranjilla) and S. sessiflorum Dunal. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 11, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036577</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boufleuher, L.M., Shuelter, A.R., Luz, C.L., Luz, C.L., Antes, V.A., Stefanello, S., Comerlato, A.P. and Otoni, W.C. (2008) In Vitro Propagation of Solanum sessiliforum as Effected by Auxin and Cytokinin Combinations and Concentrations. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 7, 639-646. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.639.646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lemos, E.E.P. and Blake, J. (1996) Micropropagation of Juvenile and Mature Annona muricata L. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 71, 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1996.11515420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanuwidjaja, C., Webb, D.T. and Sagawa, Y. (1998) Micropropagation of Akia (Wikstroemia uva-ursi A. Gray). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 53, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006036220694</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krishna, R.B., Swapna, D., Hymavathi, V., Reddy, R.R., et al. (2011) In Vitro Multiple Shoot Induction from Nodal Explants of Annona squamosa L. IUP Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 30-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souayah, N. (1993) Essais de multiplication végétative et étude du comportement morphogénétique in Vivo et in Vitro de l’Acacia cyanophylla L. D.E.A. Fc. Sc. Tunis, Tunisie, 80 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santana, J.R.F., Paiva, R., Aloufa, M.A.I. and Lemos, E.E.P. (2003) Efficiency of Amplicillin and Benomyl at Controlling Contamination of Annonaceae Leaf Segments Cultured In Vitro. Fruits, 58, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2003021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mroginski, L.A., Kartha, K.K. and Shyluk, J.P. (1981) Regeneration of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Plantlets by in Vitro Culture of Immature Leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany, 5, 826-830. https://doi.org/10.1139/b81-115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jordan, M., Iturriaga, A., Roveraro, C. and Goreux, A. (1991) Promotion of Annona cherimola In Vitro Shoot Morphogenesis as Influenced by Antioxidant. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 53, 224-227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, T.V. and Farooq, S.A. (1994) Preliminary Investigations on the in Vitro Studies in Annona squamosa L. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 1, 261-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deccetti, S.F.C., Paiva, R., De Oliveira Paiva, P.D. and Aloufa, M.A.I. (2005) La micropropagation d’Annona glabra L. à partir de segments nodaux. Fruits, 60, 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2005038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasai, S., Kantharajah, A.S. and Dodd, W.A. (1994) The Effect of Growth Regulators, Source of Explants and Irradiance on In Vitro Regeneration of Atemoya. Australian Journal of Botany, 42, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9940333</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bejoy, M. and Hariharan, M. (1992) In Vitro Plantlet Differentiation in Annona muricata L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 31, 245-247.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jordan</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>Multiple Shoot Formation and Rhizogenesis from Cherimola (Annona cherimola L.) Hypocotyls and Petiol Explants</article-title><source> Gartenbauwissenschaft</source><volume> 53</volume>,<fpage> 234</fpage>-<lpage>237</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nair, S., Gupta, P.K., Shirgurkar, M.V. and Mascarenhas, A.F. (1984) In Vitro Organogenesis from Leaf Explants of Annona squamosa Linn. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 3, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035918</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bouzid, S., Khouja, M.L., Rejeb, M.N. and Souayah, N. (2004) Micropropagation d’un arbuste sylvo-pastoral, Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiacees). In: Ferchichia and Ferchichia, Eds., Réhabilitation des paturages et des parcours en milieux méditerranéens, CIHEAM, Zaragoza, 131-135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souayah, N. (2000) Nouvelles possibilités d’obtention et de multiplication rapide de clones d’Atriplex halimus L. par micropropagation in Vitro à partir d’organes végétatifs et reproducteurs. Approches morphogénétique et physiologique. Thèse de Doctorat en Biologie, Fac. Sc. de Tunis, Tunisie, 172 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahanhanzo, C., Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H., Yehouessi, W., Ahoton, L., Ganglo, J.C., Agassounon, M., et al. (2013) étude de l’influence du chlorure mercurique sur la survie in Vitro d’explants et de l’aptitude à la régénération de teck (Tectona grandis L., Verbenaceae). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 65, 4935-4944. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v65i0.89581</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Purkayastha, J., Sugla, T., Paul, A., Solleti, S.K., Mazumdar, P., Basu, A., Mohommad, A., Ahmed, Z. and Sahoo, L. (2010) Efficient In Vitro Plant Regeneration from Shoot Apices and Gene Transfer by Particle Bombardment in Jatropha curcas. Biologia Plantarum, 54, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0003-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shrivastava, S. and Banerjee, M. (2008) In Vitro Clonal Propagation of Physicnut (Jatrophacurcas L.): Influence of Additives. International Journal of Integrative Biology, 3, 73-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shrivastava, S. and Banerjee, M. (2009) Algal Filtrate: A Low Cost Substitute to Synthetic Growth Regulators for Direct Organogenesis of Embryo Culture in Jatropha curcas (Ratanjyot). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 31, 1205-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0355-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deore, A.J. and Johnson, T.S. (2008) High Frequency Plant Regeneration from Leaf-Disc Cultures of Jatropha curcas L.: An Important Biodiesel Crop. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 2, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-008-0042-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, L.M., Paiva, R., Santana, J.R.F., Pereira, F.D., Nogueira, R.C. and Silva, L.C. (2010) Effects of Cytokinins on In Vitro Mineral Accumulation and Bud Development in Annona glabra L. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, 34, 1439-1445. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000600012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Souayah, N., Khouja, M.L., Rejeb, M.N. and Bouzid, S. (2004) Micropropagation d’un arbuste sylvo-pastoral, Atriplex halimus L. (Chénopodiacées). In: Ferchichi, A. and Ferchichi, A., Eds., Réhabilitation des paturages et des parcours en milieux méditerranéens, CIHEAM, Zaragoza, Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 62, 131-135. http://om.ciheam.org/om/pdf/c62/04600144.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoagland, D.R. and Arnon, D.I. (1938) The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circulation, 347, 32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farooq, S.A., Farooq, T.T. and Rao, T.V. (2002) Micropropagation of Annona squamosa L. Using Nodal Explants. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5, 43-46. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.43.46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lloyd, G. and Mc Cown, B. (1981) Use of Microculture for Production and Improvement of Rhododendron spp. HortScience, Alexandria, 15, 416-418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathur, N., Ramawat, K.G. and Dilip, N. (1995) Rapid in Vitro Multiplication of Jujube through Mature Stem. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 43, 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042675</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellefontaine, R. (2005) Régénération naturelle à faible co&amp;#251;t dans le cadre de l’aménagement forestier en zone tropicale sèche en Afrique. Vertigo, 16, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.4335</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellefontaine, R. (2002) Pourquoi ne pas plus exploiter l’aptitude à drageonner et à marcotter de certains ligneux des zones tropicales sèches? Sénésylva, 31, 12-23. (In Dakar) https://agritrop.cirad.fr/516701</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pointie, G. and Gaud, G. (1992) L’environnement en Afrique. Afrique Contemporaine, No. 161, 294 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Grouzis, M. and Albergel, J. (1991) Du risque climatique à la contrainte écologique: Incidence de la sécheresse sur les productions végétales et le milieu au Burkina Faso. In: Eldin, M. and Milleville, P., Eds., Le risque en agriculture, ORSTOM, Paris, Collection A travers champs, 243-254. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.16155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Michel, P. (1990) La dégradation des paysages au Sénégal. In: Richard, J.F., Ed., La dégradation des paysages en Afrique de l’ouest, AUPELF, Dakar, 37-53, 310 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed, A.L., Bassem, S.E.M., Mohamed, Y.H. and Gamila, M.W. (2010) Cytotoxic Essential Oil from Annona sengalensis Pers. Leaves. Pharmacognosy Research, 2, 211-214. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.69105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjakpa, J.B., Ahoton, L.E., Obossou, F.K. and Ogougbé, C. (2016) Ethnobotanical Study of Senegal Custard Apple (Annona senegalensis Pers.) in Dassa-Zoumé Township, Republic of Benin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 10, 2123-2137. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v10i5.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkill, H.M. (1985) The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. Vol. 1, 2nd Edition, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, 981 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raponda-Walker, A. and Sillans, R. (1961) Les plantes utiles du Gabon. Paul Lechevalier Editions, Paris, 624 p. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880206109066644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">George, A.P. and Nissen, R.J. (1993) Annonaceous Fruits. In: Robinson, R.K. and Sadler, M.J., Eds., Food Technology and Nutrition, Encyclopaedia of Food Science, Academic Press, London, 195-199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Popenoe, W. (1974) The Annonaceous Fruits. In: Popenoe, W., Ed., Manuel of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, A Facsimile of the 1920, Hafner Press, New York, 161-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maheshwari, P. and Singh, U. (1965) Dictionary of Economic Plants in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 12 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerharo, J. and Adams, J.G. (1974) La pharmacopée sénégalaise traditionnelle. Plantes médicinales et toxiques, 4&lt;sup&gt;ème&lt;/sup&gt; Trimestre. Journal d’agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée, 21, 76-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, M. (1994) Flowering Plants of the Gambia. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108488-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (2008) Custard Apples. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume III: Fruits. Lost Crops of Africa. National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>