<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2021.123021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-108053</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Phytochemical Profile and &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Antioxidant Properties of Essential Oils from Powder Fractions of &lt;i&gt;Eucalyptus camaldulensis&lt;/i&gt; Leaves
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Venant</surname><given-names>Donald Noumi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>Marcel Nguimbou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marthe</surname><given-names>Valentine Tsague</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Markusse</surname><given-names>Deli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sandrine</surname><given-names>Rup-Jacques</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dicko</surname><given-names>Amadou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Selestin</surname><given-names>Sokeng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Yanou Njintang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elie</surname><given-names>Njantou Baudelaire</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, ENSAI, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Université de Lorraine, UR-AFPA, Metz, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Université de Lorraine, ICPM, Metz, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>346</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Dried leaves of 
  Eucalyptus 
  camaldulensis
   were finely grinded and fractionated
   by sieving into four granulometric classes (&lt;100 μm, 100 - 200 μm, 200 - 355 μm and &gt;355 μm). The obtained powder fractions were used for essential oil (EO) extraction by hydrodistillation and their phytochemical profile and in vitro antioxidant activities were evaluated. The mother powder (unsieved powder) was used for comparison. Particle size exerted a significant influence (p &lt; 0.05) on the phytochemical composition and in vitro antioxidant properties of the EOs. Comparatively, the mother powder had the highest contents of α-pinene (55.6%), camphene (3.4%) and limonene (3.7%), while 1,8-cineole (26.6% and 22.4%), exo-fenchol (5.6% and 3.5%), α-campholenol (4.2% and 3.4%), L-trans-pinocarveol (5.5% and 2.7%), L-borneol (12.6% and 6.8%) and α-terpineol (16.4% and 7.6%) are the main compounds of EOs from the &lt;100 μm and 100 - 200 μm fractions, respectively. The antioxidant activities of the EOs revealed higher radical-scavenging activities DPPH (90.62% and 70.46%) and ABTS (89.59% and 73.31%) for finer fractions (&lt;100 μm and 100 - 200 μm, respectively). The best reducing power (36.15% and 34.27%) were also found in these finer powder fractions which improved by more than 2 times the value of mother powder (reducing power of 17.01%). These results suggest that grinding followed by sieve fractionation concentrates the majority of antioxidant phytochemicals in the EOs of the finer powder fractions of E. camaldulensis leaves. Finer powders could be used as functional ingredients in food formulations for the management of chronic diseases.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Eucalyptus camaldulensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Powder Fraction</kwd><kwd> Essential Oil</kwd><kwd> Chemical Composition</kwd><kwd> Antioxidant Activity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, the interest for plant-derived bioactive products has increased owing to their numerous health and nutritional benefits. Plants and their products are rich sources of phytochemicals including terpenes and polyphenols having a wide variety of biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref3">3</xref>]. With regard to antioxidant activity, it is well known that the antioxidants could attenuate the oxidative damage of a tissue indirectly by enhancing natural defenses of cell and/or directly by scavenging the free radical species. Because of that, growing attention has been paid to phytochemicals characterized as antioxidant natural products.</p><p>Eucalyptus camaldulensis is a medicinal plant with a wide spectrum of application in traditional medicine in several countries around the world. Numerous studies conducted on its essential oil (EO) have demonstrated its high antioxidant potential, mainly due to the great diversity of its phytochemicals. This is how Salem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref4">4</xref>] attributed the strong antioxidant activity of this EO to a high content of spathulenol. However, α-pinene has shown a strong antioxidant effect on the DPPH radical, the hydroxyl radical and the superoxide anion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref8">8</xref>]. Moreover, the high antioxidant effects of several terpenes like thymol, carvacrol, borneol, 1,8-cineole and α-terpineol in Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaves have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref12">12</xref>]. Since EO phytochemicals can accumulate in various parts of plants, extraction represents a main process for concentrating these active compounds. Hence, it ensures separation of these compounds from plant cellular matrix and extraction conditions determine the quality and/or quantity of extracted compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref14">14</xref>]. In this regard, plant EOs are commonly obtained using hydrodistillation. In this process, water is used for extraction of plant active compounds as it has been recognized as safe solvent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref15">15</xref>]. Unfortunately, this method usually requires long time with increased risk of degradation of thermo-labile constituents and results in low yields of extraction depending on the rigidity of plant material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Grinding followed by particle size fractionation consists of producing powders of the plant and spraying it on a column of sieves with decreasing mesh diameters. Theoretically, the molecules are distributed according to the size of the particles, which makes it possible to concentrate on a fraction of a group of biomolecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref19">19</xref>]. Using this technique, many authors demonstrated that powder fractionation resulted in concentrating polyphenols in finer particle size [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref22">22</xref>]. Otherwise, our previous study reported that finer fractions (&lt;180 &#181;m and 180 - 212 &#181;m) of Dichrostachys glomerata, Adansonia digitata, Boscia senegalensis and Hibiscus sabdariffa concentrated more polyphenols, micronutrients and antioxidant activities as ethanolic extract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref25">25</xref>]. However, there is no study on the effect of powder fractionation on the EO phytochemicals in relation to their antioxidant activities. Yet, the application of this new approach which combines the advantages of sieve fractionation and hydrodistillation would allow efficient access to the phytochemicals of E. camaldulensis leaves. The high-antioxidant powders or their EOs could be useful as functional ingredients in nutraceutical formulations.</p><p>Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of particle size fractionation by sieving on the concentration of phytochemicals and the antioxidant activities of the EO in powder fractions from E. camaldulensis leaves. To achieve this, the study focused firstly on assessing the mother powder granulometry and the EO yields from sieving fractionation. Secondly on comparing the phytochemical contents and the antioxidant activities (DPPH, ABTS, reducing power) of the EOs of different powder fractions. Mother powder was also analyzed and served as a control.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>The fresh leaves of E. camaldulensis were used as plant material in the present study. This plant material was collected from Dang locality (Ngaoundere, Cameroon: latitude 7'42'46; longitude 13'55'59) in October 2017. Identification was made in comparison with the sample N˚4039 SRFT/am of the National Herbarium of Cameroon. After washing and cleaning, the leaves were dried in the shade of a hangar with air circulation at room temperature which varied from 14˚C to 38˚C. The leaves are spread on a clean sheet in thin layers and turned over frequently for seven days.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Grinding and Particle Size Analysis</title><p>The dried leaves of E. camaldulensis were ground in the Moulinex robot blender mill supplied with a sieve drilled with 1 mm trapezoid holes. The analytical method used by Nguimbou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref26">26</xref>] was applied for the analysis of particle size distribution of the obtained powder. The measurement was carried out using laser by Mastersizer 3000 (Malvern Instruments, Orsay, France) supplied with the Aero S wet dispersion unit. The chosen size estimator was the particle size in volume and classical granulometric parameters were determined: D10, D50 and D90 (where Dx means that x% of the volume of particles has a diameter inferior to Dx). The span, a common parameter related to the width of particle size distribution was calculated as follows:</p><p>Span = D 90 − D 10 D 50 (1)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Powder Sieving</title><p>The plant powder was separated into granulometric classes using a series of three sieves of various apertures (100 &#181;m, 200 &#181;m and 355 &#181;m) selected on the basis of the particle size analysis. The powder was sieved according to procedure used in previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref27">27</xref>]. For that, 100 g of powder passed through sieve columns using an Analysette 3 Spartan apparatus (Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to obtain fraction powders. Sieve shaker vibration amplitude was set at 0.5 mm for 10 min. Thus, the fraction of the powder retained on each sieve is recovered and weighed for the calculation of the mass fraction of each granulometric fraction. The following powder fractions were obtained: &lt;100 &#181;m, 100 - 200 &#181;m, 200 - 355 &#181;m and &gt;355 &#181;m with a moisture content of about 10% - 12%. Non fractioned (mother powder) powder was taken as control. The powdered samples were stored at 10˚C in polyethylene bags and placed at room temperature (25˚C &#177; 2˚C) until they were used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Essential Oils Extraction</title><p>The EO were extracted from each powder fraction by hydrodistillation using an adapted device of the Clevenger type for 5 hours. The EO collected by decantation was filtered through a column of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The essences obtained were introduced into dark bottles and stored at 4˚C protected from light. The essential oil yield was expressed as volume of the distillate (V) per kg of dry leaves (Ms) and calculated as follows:</p><p>Yield ( mL / kg ) = V Ms &#215; 100 (2)</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Chemical Composition Analysis</title><p>The analysis of the EO was carried out using a Varian CP-3380 type chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector and a capillary column (30 m &#215; 0.25 mm) with a stationary apolar phase of methylsilicone type (DB5, film thickness 0.25 μm). The oven was programmed from 50˚C to 200˚C with a temperature gradient of 5˚C/min. The injector temperature was 200˚C and the detector set to 200˚C. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The retention indices of the constituents were determined relative to the retention times of a series of n-alkanes and their relative percentages calculated by electronic integration without taking into account their response factors. The coupling gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was carried out using an apparatus of the brand Hewlett-Packard HP 5970 A, equipped with an apolar capillary column (30 m &#215; 0.25 mm) in fused silica of type HP -1 (film thickness 0.25 μm) and a quadrupole type detector (ionization energy 70 eV). The temperature of the injector was 220˚C and that of the interface area was 210˚C. The oven temperature was programmed from 70˚C to 200˚C with a gradient of 10˚C/min. The carrier gas is helium with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The acquisition was made in scan mode (35 - 300 amu) at 2.96 scan/s. The components were identified on the basis of their retention indices and their mass spectra by comparison with data from the literature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of EO</title><sec id="s2_6_1"><title>2.6.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Capacity</title><p>The DPPH anti-free radical activity of the EO samples was evaluated in accordance with the method of Zhang and Hamauzu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref28">28</xref>] with slights modifications. A volume of 0.5 mL of the methanolic solution of each EO extract at a concentration of 2 mg/mL was added to 1 mL of the DPPH solution (0.025 g/L). In parallel, a negative control was prepared by mixing 0.5 mL of methanol with 1 mL of the methanolic solution of DPPH. The optical density recorded at 517 nm using the methanolic solution for the blank tube and ascorbic acid as standard after 60 min of incubation in the dark and at laboratory temperature (25˚C &#177; 2˚C). The percentage of free radical scavenging effect was calculated as follows:</p><p>DPPH scavenging effect ( % ) = DO control − DO sample DO control &#215; 100 (3)</p></sec><sec id="s2_6_2"><title>2.6.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Capacity</title><p>The ABTS anti-free radical activity of the EO samples was determined according to the method described by Re et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref29">29</xref>]. ABTS radical was produced with the mixture of 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 16 h before use. After incubation, the absorbance of the solution at 734 nm was adjusted to 0.70 &#177; 0.02 by dilution with 95% ethanol. Then in a test tube, 2 mL of this diluted ABTS solution and 150 μL of each ethanolic solution of the different EO extracts at the concentration of 2 mg/mL were introduced and well stirred, incubated at laboratory temperature (25˚C &#177; 2˚C) for 10 min and the absorbance recorded at 734 nm. Ascorbic acid solution (1 mg/mL) was used as a standard. The percentage of free radical scavenging effect was calculated as follows:</p><p>ABTS scavenging effect ( % ) = DO control − DO sample DO control &#215; 100 (4)</p></sec><sec id="s2_6_3"><title>2.6.3. Total Reducing Power</title><p>The total reducing power of the methanolic/water extracts was investigated using the method developed by Oyaizu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref30">30</xref>]. One milliliter of the extract of each sample was mixed with 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (200 mM, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium hexacyanoferrate [K3Fe (CN) 6] solution. The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 50˚C for 30 min, cooled, mixed with 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid solution and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was removed and mixed with 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL FeCl<sub>3</sub> (1.0%), allowed to react for 10 min at room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Ascorbic acid solution was used as standard. The reducing power is determined by referring to the calibration curve of ascorbic acid and expressed in terms of mg ascorbic acid equivalent per g of dry matter (mg AAE/g DM).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Analyses were performed in triplicate and the results presented as mean &#177; SD. Statistical significance of diﬀerences between sample means was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Duncan’s test at 95% confidence level using statgraphics 15.1. Principal component analysis (PCA) has been used to classify and correlate the factors that define powder fractions, phytochemical compounds and antioxidant activities and was realized by XL-STAT 2019.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Particle Size Characteristics of the Mother Powder</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents the particle size characteristics of the mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves studied. Particle size distribution of the mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves was polymodal with a volume of fine particles around 34 &#181;m (D10), a median volume of particles around 195 &#181;m (D50) and a volume of large particles around 735 &#181;m (D90). The major volume of E. camaldulensis mother powder corresponded to large particles, whereas fine particles were less numerous (10% of a total volume of the powder). The low span value of 2.3 reflects a low dispersion of the mother powder and confirmed the correct running of the grinding process. Indeed, a dispersion is said to be wide if its span is greater than 3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>The fact that the major volume of E. camaldulensis powder corresponded to large particles can be explained by the expected non-sphericity of large particles, as ground fibers generally lead to large rod-shaped particles. So, fine particles can stick to larger particles and thus be retained by sieves of mesh size exceeding their diameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref27">27</xref>]. As the median distribution of the mother powder being located around 200 μm, the fractionation sieves were chosen as follows: a 200 μm sieve for studying the particles around the median; a 100 &#181;m sieve for studying particles below the median and a 355 &#181;m sieve for studying particles above the median.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sieved Mass, Mass Fraction and EO Yield</title><p>The sieving fractionation was carried out on E. camaldulensis mother powder in order to check if the employed sieving procedure was efficient in producing powder fractions having well-different particle size (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). It can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> that the &gt;355 &#181;m fraction was the most represented in the mother powder of E. camaldulensis with a mass yield of 44.4% followed by the 100 - 200 &#181;m, 200 - 355 &#181;m and &lt;100 &#181;m fractions reaching 19.6%, 18.6% and 14.1%, respectively. The sieving procedure was effective in producing enough powder for further analyses in all granulometric classes. According to Becker et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref20">20</xref>], a longer grinding time and/or a higher grinding speed could increase mass yields of E. camaldulensis powder fractions after sieving. Even more, using a grinding sieve of smaller mesh can also be considered to fulfill higher mass yields for finer fractions (&lt;100 &#181;m) of E. camaldulensis leaves powder. Based on these results, one would expect differences on EO extraction yields in these powder fractions.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Particle size characteristics of the mother powder of E. camaldulensis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics (&#181;m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.5 &#177; 1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194.5 &#177; 1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >734.3 &#177; 3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Span (-)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sieved mass, mass fraction, and EO yield of the different granulometric classes and mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Granulometric classes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sieved mass (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass fraction (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EO Yield (mL/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;100 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40 &#177; 0.1<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 200 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80 &#177; 0.1<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 - 355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 &#177; 0.1<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.1<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mother powder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.1<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means &#177; standard in the EO column followed by different letters were statistically different (p &lt; 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 3).</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the mother powder of E. camaldulensis has the best EO yield (1.6 mL/kg) compared to the powder fractions. These values are much lower than those obtained by El Hajji et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref31">31</xref>] whose EO yields were comprised between 15 and 16 mL/kg for dried E. camaldulensis leaves. Observed differences in yield could be explained by the fact that after drying, the leaves were ground into a fine powder and then sieved, while our predecessors did so on dried and whole leaves. From this point of view, it could be admitted that, during the grinding and sieving processes of the leaves, there is loss of volatile compounds of low molecular weight. Indeed, EO are highly volatile liquid compounds synthesized in specialized histological structures often located on or near the plant structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref32">32</xref>]. The work of Cheftel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref33">33</xref>] demonstrated that the yields of EO are markedly reduced depending on the types of drying: in the shade, activated by ventilation, assisted by lamps or using a resistance. Even more, Akhihi&#233;ro et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref34">34</xref>] demonstrated that there is progressive decrease of the EO yield from 8.4 to 5.1 mL/kg as the particle size of Cymbopogon citratus leaves decreases from 20 mm to 4 mm. Cryogenic grinding makes it possible to preserve sensitive active ingredients such as EO and vitamins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref35">35</xref>], which has not been the case in this work. The leaves were crushed using an electric mill without a temperature stabilization device (thermogenic) which would further explain the great loss of volatile compounds. However, sieving fractionation allowed to concentrate more EO in the 100 - 200 &#181;m fraction (0.80 mL/kg), which has the highest yield compared to the rest of the fractions: 200 - 355 &#181;m (0.68 mL/kg), &lt;100 &#181;m (0.40 mL/kg) and &gt;355 &#181;m (0.32 mL/kg). This result could be explained by the fact that in Myrtaceae, EO are trapped in the secretory pockets of specialized cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref36">36</xref>]. From this point of view, we can admit that 100 - 200 &#181;m fraction concentrates the maximum of secretory cells which remained unexploded after the grinding operation; these EO were released later under the constraints of temperature and pressure during hydrodistillation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Chemical Composition of the EO Samples</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> displays the analytical results for phytochemicals of EO from all granulometric classes, as well as for the mother powder of E. camaldulensis. The variation in the retention time of the different phytochemicals is shown resumed in the chromatogram of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The results show that the sieving procedure had a great inﬂuence on the chemical composition of studied samples. The α-pinene, 1,8-cineole and α-terpineol are the main compounds respectively in the EO of the mother powder (55.6%, 20.3%, 5.7%) and fractions &gt; 355 &#181;m (59.3%, 20.1%, 4.5%), 200 - 355 &#181;m (51.2%, 23.9%, 5.8%), 100 - 200 &#181;m (47%, 22.4%, 7.6%) and &lt;100 &#181;m (25.8%, 26.6%, 16.4%). These results are different from those obtained in EO of E. camaldulensis by Da Cruz Francisco et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref37">37</xref>] whose main compounds were 1,8-cineole (59.5%), α-pinene (9.2%) and limonene (8.7%) and those identified by Nah et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref38">38</xref>]: p-cymene (39.4%), 1,8 cineole (19.9%), limonene (15.4%) and α-pinene (5.4%) in malian E. camaldulensis leaves, as well as those obtained by Pagula et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref39">39</xref>]: 1,8 cineole (40%), β-pinene (9.2%), terpinene (5.3%) and p-cymene (4.7%) in Mozambique E. camaldulensis leaves. As reported by the authors, the variation in the chemical composition of the EO samples as a function of the regions is due to edaphic and climatic factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref41">41</xref>]. Even more, the results show a higher content of L-borneol (12.6%), L-trans-pinocarveol (5.5%), α-campholenol (4.2%) and exo-fenchol (5.6%) in the &lt;100 &#181;m fraction. These values are higher than those of the other fractions and that of the mother powder. These results could be explained by the fact that terpenes react with oxygen (in the air) to form new compounds through the auto-oxidation mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref42">42</xref>]. In fact, in aerobiosis, oxygen promotes the oxygenation and hydroxylation reactions of the double carbon bond favoring the</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition (%) of the different granulometric classes and mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Compounds</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Granulometric classes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retention time (min)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;100 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 200 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 - 355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mother powder</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-pinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >camphene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >limonene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,8-cineole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >exo-fenchol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-campholenol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L-trans-pinocarveol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L-borneol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-terpineol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>transformation of hydrocarbon terpenes into oxygenated terpenes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref43">43</xref>]. In this regard, we can admit that the reduction in the size of the particles by the grinding/sieving process, increases the contact surface with atmospheric oxygen. As a result, the EO self-oxidation process is more important in small particles compared to large particles. This justifies the reduction in the level of hydrocarbon terpenes, in particular α-pinene and limonene in the &lt;100 &#181;m and 100 - 200 &#181;m fractions.</p><p>According to Neuenschwander et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref44">44</xref>], the structure of α-pinene has four possible oxidation sites and its auto-oxidation depends on three factors: the ambient temperature, the oxygen flow and the exposure time. So, the auto-oxidation of α-pinene can lead to the formation of L-trans-pinocarveol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref45">45</xref>]. Furthermore, the work of Rio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref46">46</xref>] demonstrated that, atmospheric oxidants (hydroxyl radical OH, Nitrate NO<sub>3</sub>, Ozone O<sub>3</sub>) react with terpenes promoting the self-oxidation process. This is how limonene could react with the OH radical to form α-terpineol, as well as the oxidation of α-pinene in air which leads to the formation of derivative compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref47">47</xref>]. However, the degradability of aerobic terpenes varies depending on the type of molecule and depends on the possible presence of a group. In this respect, Wilson and Hrutfiord [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref48">48</xref>] reported different rates of degradation mainly associated with molecular type. Alcohols are degraded to 99%, hydrocarbons to 75% and ketones to 12%. This aerobic metabolism can consist of several chemical reactions such as the hydroxylation of allylic carbons, the oxygenation of carbon-carbon double bonds, or the oxidation of alcohols to ketones as well as the breakdown of certain cyclic structures.</p><p>Otherwise, the transformation of limonene into α-terpineol by Penicillium digitarum is initiated by the epoxidation of the double bond in position 8, 9 and followed by the reductive rupture which forms α-terpineol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref49">49</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Antioxidant Activity of EO Samples</title><p>The antioxidant activity of EO samples from E. camaldulensis leaves powders was measured in terms of radical scavenging ability and total reducing power. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> is reported the antioxidant activity of the EO assessed by different tests. The DPPH assay is known to provide reliable information concerning the antioxidant capacity of specific compounds or extracts across a short time scale. From the DPPH assay, the maximal antioxidant activity of EO was recorded for the &lt;100 &#181;m fraction (90.62% &#177; 0.13%) followed by the 100 - 200 &#181;m fraction (73.31% &#177; 3.13%) whereas, the EO of mother powder had the lowest DPPH free radical scavenging activity (70.37% &#177; 21%). Compared to ascorbic acid (96.29% &#177; 0.28%) used as antioxidant reference, the fractions of E. camaldulensis powder were less active against the DPPH and ABTS radicals. Similarly, Barra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref50">50</xref>] demonstrated significant anti-radical activity with DPPH in EO of E. camaldulensis leaves collected in different localities of Sardinia in Italy. This author attributes the variation in anti-radical potential to the difference in phytochemical compounds in the EO. This suggests that, the particle size fractionation affected the chemical composition of the EO of E. camaldulensis to different extents as mentioned above (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Thus, the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity of the EO in the &lt;100 &#181;m fraction would be due to its high concentration of oxygenated terpenes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref51">51</xref>]. Earlier studies have indicated that oxygenated terpenes such as thymol, carvacol, borneol, 1,8-cineole, α-terpineol, have a significant antioxidant effect, mainly due to their redox properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref12">12</xref>]. Thus, the high contents in phytochemical compounds of EO of finer powder fractions are likely responsible for their DPPH scavenging capacity.</p><p>The antioxidant activity of EO samples was also measured in terms of radical scavenging ability using the ABTS assay. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> displays the ABTS radical scavenging activity of the EO in the different granulometric fractions and mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves. Significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) were denoted between the antioxidant activity of the different fractions and unsieved powder. As for the DPPH test, the maximal antioxidant activity of EO was recorded for the &lt;100 &#181;m fraction (89.59% &#177; 0.09%) followed by the 100 - 200 &#181;m fraction (70.46% &#177; 2.83%). Compared to the mother powder, the 100 - 200 &#181;m and &lt;100 &#181;m fractions were 1.5 times and 2 times more active against the ABTS radicals, respectively. For most of the samples tested, the effect obtained with the DPPH method is not correlated with that obtained by the ABTS method; the results differ by these two methods. These variations can be explained by the mechanisms involved in the antioxidant reactions of radicals. The EO samples were dissolved in ethanol for the ABTS test, while methanol was used for DPPH test. This suggests that, solubility of the EO in different solvents can influence their effect. Indeed, the antioxidant activity of the tested compounds depends on the agent used and insisting on the mechanism of action of the antioxidant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref52">52</xref>]. Other factors, such as the stereo-selectivity of the radicals or the solubility of the compounds in the different test systems can also influence the capacity of each EO to react and to reduce the different radicals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref53">53</xref>]. Antioxidant activity deduced by the ABTS experiment allowed sorting powders according to their antioxidant activity in the following decreasing order: &lt;100 &#181;m, 100 - 200 &#181;m, 200 - 355 &#181;m, &gt;355 &#181;m and the mother powder.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidant activities for the different granulometric classes and mother powder of E. camaldulensis leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Granulometric classes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Antioxidant test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DPPH inhibition (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ABTS inhibition (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reducing power (mg AAE/g DM)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;100 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.62 &#177; 0.13<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.59 &#177; 0.09<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.15 &#177; 2.46<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 200 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.31 &#177; 3.13<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.46 &#177; 2.83<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.27 &#177; 1.97<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 - 355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.77 &#177; 4.08<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.03 &#177; 0.3<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.48 &#177; 2.83<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;355 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.11 &#177; 5.42<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00 &#177; 2.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.19 &#177; 0.45<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mother powder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.37 &#177; 2.09<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#177; 0.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 &#177; 0.55<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AAE: ascorbic acid equivalent, DM: dry matter, Means &#177; standard in the EO column followed by different letters were statistically different (p &lt; 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 3).</p><p>The reducing power of antioxidants is an important indicator of potential antioxidant activity. The antioxidant effect increases as a function of the reducing power, indicating that the antioxidant properties are concomitant with the development of reducing power [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref30">30</xref>]. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> is presented the reducing power of studied EO samples. EO of the &lt;100 &#181;m fraction displayed the highest reducing power (36.15 &#177; 2.46 mg AA/g DM), while EO of the &gt;355 &#181;m fraction showed the lowest reducing power (7.19 &#177; 0.45 mg AA/g DM). These results of the reducing power test were shown to agree with those of the DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging activities. This can be attributed to the fact that, DPPH, ABTS and reducing power tests are electron transfer reaction-based assays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref54">54</xref>]. In fact, in the reducing power assay, the presence of reductants (antioxidants) terpenoids causes the reduction of the Fe<sup>3+</sup> or ferricyanide complex to its ferrous form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref55">55</xref>]. As stated by Malecky [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref36">36</xref>], oxygen that has a number of oxidation (II) easily gives electrons during oxido-reduction reactions, while molecular oxygen is the final electron acceptor, important in reduction reactions. Thus, terpenes which have a low number of functional groups (hydroxyl and carbonyl) have a reduced activity in the reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref55">55</xref>]. However, the antioxidant activity of the majority compounds tested separately gives lower results compared to the activity of the total EO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref56">56</xref>]. This suggests that, finer powder fractions richer in phytochemicals concentrate the various compounds of the EO, which act synergistically for much greater antioxidant activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref57">57</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Principal Component Analysis and Correlations</title><p>Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most widely used methods for multivariate analysis. It was performed to present an overview of the similarities and differences between the EO from powder fractions and to highlight the correlations between the terpene compounds and the antioxidant activities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). This analysis makes it possible to identify more clearly the fractions having the EO with different contents of phytochemical compounds and therefore different antioxidant activities. The principal components PC1 and PC2 represented a total of 94.69% variation of powder properties. The distribution of powder samples on the PC1 &#215; PC2 plot revealed a separation of powder samples into 2 groups of fractions made up for group 1 of &lt;100 &#181;m and 100 - 200 &#181;m fractions and for group 2 of 200 - 355 &#181;m, &gt;355 &#181;m fractions and the mother powder. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows that the powder fractions of group 1 whose contents of exo-fenchol, L-borneol, α-terpineol, L-trans-pinocarveol and 1,8-cineole have significantly increased (p &lt; 0.05), were correlated to high anti-free radical effect and exhibit a high reducing power. On the other hand, these EO chemical compounds and antioxidant activities are lower in the fractions of group 2. We notice that most of the molecules which increased in the fractions of group 1 are essentially oxygenated terpenes. While group 2 recorded a high concentration of hydrocarbon terpenes.</p><p>In this regard, it was observed a strong correlation between the exo-fenchol variable and the anti-free radical test with DPPH (r = 0.82, p &lt; 0.05) as well as the total reducing power (r = 0.85, p &lt; 0.05). Concerning the anti-free radical test with ABTS, the strongest correlation (r = 0.87, p &lt; 0.05) was observed with 1,8-cineole. Thus, exo-fenchol and 1,8-cineole appear to be the terpenes with higher antioxidant potential. Pearson’s correlation between terpenes and the different antioxidant tests makes it possible to note that the different variables, namely 1,8-cineole, exo-fenchol, L-trans-pinocarveol, L-borneol and α-terpineol are positively correlated, in particular with regard to the inhibition of DPPH, ABTS radicals and reducing power. These strong correlations (r &gt; 0.5) would be due to the fact that the presence of the oxygen molecule as well as the carbon-carbon double bond in the structure of terpenes makes them more willing to redox reactions which can therefore reduce free radicals in solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108053-ref54">54</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study permitted to investigate the effects of size reduction technology on the phytochemical compounds, and antioxidant properties of EO from E. camaldulensis leaves. EO of E. camaldulensis leaves is mainly composed of α-pinene, 1,8-cineole and α-terpineol. The particle size fractionation by sieving made it possible to significantly concentrate the α-terpineol, L-borneol, L-trans-pinocarveol and exo-fenchol in the EO of the &lt;100 &#181;m and 100 - 200 &#181;m fractions of the leaves of E. camaldulensis. However, it is important to control grinding speed, particle size and hydrodistillation conditions to avoid phytochemicals degradation by heat and oxidation. The distribution of molecules as a function of particle size revealed the EO of the &lt;100 &#181;m and 100 - 200 &#181;m fractions as the most effective in reducing the concentration of DPPH and ABTS in solution. Ultimately, the results of this work show that particle size fractionation by sieving concentrates the phytochemical compounds in finer fractions of the powders of E. camaldulensis leaves, while enhancing the antioxidant potential of their EOs. Overall, these finer powder fractions offer high potential in the management of oxidative reactions associated with human and plant pathologists.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Authors thank with greatness the Faculty of Science and the ENSAI of the University of Ngaoundere (Cameroon) for the support in the form of infrastructural facilities made available in undertaking the present study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Article Highlights</title><p>&#183; Here we have chosen a new approach which combines the advantages of sieve fractionation and hydrodistillation to access phytochemicals in E. camaldulensis leaves;</p><p>&#183; The higher antioxidant activities were associated with essential oils from finer powder fractions which concentrated the majority of phytochemicals;</p><p>&#183; The essential oils from finer powder fractions of E. camaldulensis leaves have shown a huge antioxidant potential useful in the management of oxidative reactions associated with human and plant pathologists.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Noumi, V.D., Nguimbou, R.M., Tsague, M.V., Deli, M., Rup-Jacques, S., Amadou, D., Baudelaire, E.N., Sokeng, S. and Njintang, N.Y. (2021) Phytochemical Profile and In Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Essential Oils from Powder Fractions of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaves. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 329-346. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.123021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.108053-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuate, D., Etoundi, B.C., Judith, L.N., Wan, A.M.B. and Julius, E.O. (2013) Anti-Inflammatory, Anthropometric and Lipomodulatory Effects of Dyglomera (Aqueous Extract of Dichrostachys glomerata) in Obese Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Functional Foods in Health and Disease, 11, 416-427.  
https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v3i11.35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Da-Costa-Rocha, I., Bonnlaender, B., Sievers, H., Pischel, I. and Heinrich, M. (2014) Hibiscus sabdariffa L.—A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review. Food Chemistry, 165, 424-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jafarian, A., Zolfaghari, B. and Shirani, K. (2014) Cytotoxicity of Different Extracts of Arial Parts of Ziziphus spina-christi on Hela and MDA-MB-468 Tumor Cells. Advanced Biomedical Research, 3, 38. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.125727</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salem, M.Z., Ashmawy, N.A., Elansary, H.O. and El-Settawy, A.A. (2015) Chemotyping of Various Eucalyptus Species Grown in Egypt and Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of its Respective Essential Oils. Natural Product Research, 7, 681-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2014.981539</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, A. and Shibamoto, T. (2007) Antioxidant Activities and Volatile Constituents of Various Essential Oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 1737-1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062959x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W., Wu, N., Zu, Y.G. and Fu, Y.J. (2008) Antioxidative Activity of Rosmarinus officinalis. Food Chemistry, 108, 1019-1022.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, H.P., Mittal, S., Kaur, S., Batish, D.R. and Kohli, R.K. (2009) Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Fresh and Decaying Leaves of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 6962-6966.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9012407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ho, C.L. and Su, Y.C. (2012) Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of the Essential Oil Leaf of Machilus japonica from Taiwan. Natural Product Communications, 7, 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1200700136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miguel, M.G. (2010) Antioxidant Activity of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. A Review. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 25, 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1961</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bicas, J.L., Neri-Numa, I.A., Ruiz, A.L.T.G., De Carvalho, J.E. and Pastore, G.M. (2011) Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Potential of Bioflavors. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49, 1610-1615.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.04.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dar, M.Y., Shah, W.A., Rather, M.A., Qurishi, Y., Hamid, A. and Qurishi, M.A. (2011) Chemical Composition, in Vitro Cytotoxic and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oil and Major Constituents of Cymbopogon jawarancusa (Kashmir). Food Chemistry, 129, 1606-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moon, H.K., Kang, P., Lee, H.S., Min, S.S. and Seol, G.H. (2014) Effects of 1,8-Cineole on Chronic Exposure to Nicotine in Rats. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 66, 688-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golmakani, M.T. and Rezaei, K. (2008) Comparison of Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation with the Traditional Hydrodistillation Method in the Extraction of Essential Oils from Thymus vulgaris L. Food Chemistry, 109, 925-930.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akram, A., Younis, A., Akhtar, G., Ameer, K., Farooq, A., Hanif, M.A., Saeed, M. and Lim, K.B. (2017) Comparative Efficacy of Various Essential Oil Extraction Techniques on Oil Yield and Quality of Jasminum sambac L. Science International, 5, 84-95. https://doi.org/10.17311/sciintl.2017.84.95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monroy, Y.M., Rodrigues, R.A.F., Sartoratto, A. and Cabral, F.A. (2016) Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cob and Pericarp of Purple Corn (Zea mays L.) by Sequential Extraction in Fixed Bed Extractor Using Supercritical CO2, Ethanol, and Water as Solvents. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 107, 250-259.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2015.09.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azmir, J., Zaidul, I.S.M., Rahman, M.M., Sharif, K.M., Mohamed, A., Sahena, F., Jahurul, M.H.A., Ghafoor, K., Norulini, N.A.N. and Omar, A.K.M. (2013) Techniques for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Materials: A Review. Journal of Food Engineering, 117, 426-436.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baudelaire, E. (2013) Comminution and Controlled Differential Screening Method for the Dry Extraction of Natural Active Principles. Google Patent WO2013057379A1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malela, K.E., Petit, J., Nzikou, J.M. and Scher, J. (2016) Physicochemical Characterization and Phytochemical Study of Grewia coriacea Mast Powders: Focus on Polyphenols. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering &amp; Technology, 3, 512-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguang, S.L., Yeong, L.Y., Pang, F.S. and Gimbun, J. (2017) Ultrasonic Assisted Extraction on Phenolic and Flavonoid Content from Phyllanthus niruri Plant. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 10, 1-5.  
https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i2/110391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Becker, L., Zaiter, A., Petit, J., Zimmer, D., Karam, M.C., Baudelaire, E., Scher, J. and Dicko, A. (2016) Improvement of Antioxidant Activity and Polyphenol Content of Hypericum perforatum and Achillea millefolium Powders Using Successive Grinding and Sieving. Industrial Crops and Products, 87, 116-123.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Becker, L., Zaiter, A., Petit, J., Karam, M.C., Sudol, M., Baudelaire, E., Scher, J. and Dicko, A. (2017) How Do Grinding and Sieving Impact on Physicochemical Properties, Polyphenol Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Hieracium pilosella L. Powders. Journal of Functional Foods, 35, 666-672.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.06.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaiter, A., Becker, L., Karam, M.C. and Dicko, A. (2016) Effect of Particle Size on Antioxidant Activity and Catechin Content of Green Tea Powders. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53, 2025-2032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2201-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deli, M., Djantou, E.B., Ngatchic, M.J.T., Petit, J., Njintang, Y.N. and Scher, J. (2019a) Successive Grinding and Sieving as a New Tool to Fractionate Polyphenols and Antioxidants of Plants Powders: Application to Boscia senegalensis Seeds, Dichrostachys glomerata Fruits, and Hibiscus sabdariffa Calyx Powders. Food Science and Nutrition, 7, 1795-1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deli, M., Baudelaire, E., Nguimbou, R.M., Njintang, Y.N. and Scher, J. (2020) Micronutrients and In Vivo Antioxidant Properties of Powder Fractions and Ethanolic Extract of Dichrostachys glomerata Forssk. Food Science and Nutrition, 8, 3287-3297.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deli, M., Nguimbou, R.M., Baudelaire, E.N., Njintang, Y.N., Scher, J. and Mbofung, C.M. (2020) Effect of Controlled Differential Sieving Processing on Micronutrient Contents and in Vivo Antioxidant Activities of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Calyxes Powder. Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00828-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguimbou, R.M., Fomekong, G.C., Deli, M., Tsague, M.V., Baudelaire, E.N. and Njintang, Y.N. (2020) Enhancing the Quality of Overripe Plantain Powder by Adding Superfne Fractions of Adansonia digitata L. Pulp and Hibiscus sabdarifa L. Calyces: Characterization and Antioxidant Activity Assessment. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03638-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deli, M., Petit, J., Nguimbou, R.M., Djantou, E.B., Njintang, Y.N. and Scher, J. (2019b) Effect of Sieved Fractionation on the Physical, Flow and Hydration Properties of Boscia senegalensis Lam., Dichostachys glomerata Forssk. and Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Powders. Food Science and Technology, 28, 1375-1389.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00597-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, D. and Hamauzu, Y. (2004) Phenolics Ascorbic Acid Carotenoids and Antioxidant Activity of Broccoli and Their Changes during Conventional and Microwave. Food Chemistry, 88, 503-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M. and Rice-Evans, C. (1999) Antioxidant Activity Applying an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 26, 1231-1237.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyaizu, M. (1986) Studies on Products of Browning Reaction: Antioxidative Activities of Products of Browning Reaction Prepared from Glucosamine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 44, 307-315.  
https://doi.org/10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, E.H.B., Gueye, M.T., Ndiaye, I., Diop, S.M., Diop, M.B., Fauconnier, M.L. and Lognay, G. (2017) Eucalyptus Species from Senegal: Eucalyptus alba Renv, Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh and Eucalyptus tereticornis Hook. American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products, 5, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruneton, J. (1987) Elements of Phytochemistry and Pharmacognosy. Lavoisier, Paris, 585 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheftel, J.C., Cheftel, H. and Besancon, P. (1983) Introduction to Biochemistry and Food Technology. Volume 2. Techniques and Documentation, 4th Edition. Lavoisier. Paris, 420 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akhihiero, E.T., Ayodele, B.V. and Akpojotor, G.E. (2013) Effect of Particle Size and Temperature Variation on the Yield of Essential Oil from Lemon Grass Using Steam Distillation. African Journal of Physics, 6, 105-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tischer, B., Vendruscolo, R.G., Wagner, R., Menezes, C.R. Barin, C.S., Giacomelli, S.R., Budel, J.M. and Barin, J.S. (2017) Effect of Grinding Method on the Analysis of Essential Oil from Baccharis articulata (Lam.) Pers. Chemical Papers, 71, 753-761.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-016-0052-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malecky, M. (2008) The Metabolism of Terpenoids in Caprins. Life Sciences [q-bio]. AgroParisTech, 201 p. https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00004406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Francisco, J.D.C., Jarvenpaa, E.P., Huopalahti, R. and Sivik, B. (2001) Comparison of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. Oils from Mozambique Obtained by Hydrodistillation and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 2339-2342. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0013611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nah-Traore</surname><given-names> Bouaré</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.</surname><given-names> Sidibe</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> L.</surname><given-names> Somboro</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.A.</surname><given-names> Fofana</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> B.</surname><given-names> Tangara</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> O.</surname><given-names> Diallo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> D.</surname><given-names> Chalchat</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> J.C. and Figuiredo</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils of Eucalyptus camaldulensis from Mali</article-title><source> Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 69</fpage>-<lpage>73</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pagula, F.P., Kurkcuoglu, M. and Baser, C.K.H. (2000) Essential Oil Composition of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. from Mozambique. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 12, 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2000.9699530</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchoumbougnang, F., Jazet, D.P.M., Sameza, M.L., Nkouaya, M.E.G., Tiako, F.G.B., Amvam Zollo, P.H. and Menut, C. (2009) Larvicide Activity on Anopheles gambiae Giles and Chemical Composition of Essential Oils Extracted from Four Plants Grown in Cameroon. Biotechnology Agronomy Society and Environment, 13, 77-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jouault, S. (2012) The Quality of the Essential Oils and Its Influence on Their Efficiency and Toxicity. Thesis, Pharmacological Faculty, University of Lorraine, Nancy, 137 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collet, E. (2002) Progress in Dermatology. John Libbey Eurotext, France, Dijon, Vol. 8, 271 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Misra, G., Pavlostathis, S.G., Perdue, E.M. and Araujo, R. (1996) Aerobic Biodegradation of Selected Monoterpenes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 45, 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050770</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neuenschwander, U., Guignard, F. and Hermans, I. (2010) Mechanism of the Aerobic Oxidation of α-Pinene. ChemSusChem, 3, 75-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200900228</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krings, U., Lehnert, N., Fraatz, M.A., Hardebusch, B., Zorn, H. and Berger, R. (2009) Autoxidation versus Biotransformation of α-Pinene and Stereoselective Dehydrogenation of Verbenol. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 9944-9950.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901442q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rio, C. (2009) Study of the Mechanisms of Oxidation of Terpene Compounds by the OH Radical. Thesis, Doctoral School of Chemical Sciences, Bordeaux I University, Bordeaux, 143 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baser, K.H.C. and Buchbauer, G. (2010) Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton/London/New York.  
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420063165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names> D. and Hrutfiord B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1975</year>)<article-title>The Fate of Turpentine in Aerated Lagoons</article-title><source> Pulp Paper Canada</source><volume> 76</volume>,<fpage> 195</fpage>-<lpage>197</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demyttenaere, J.C.R., belleghem, K.V. and Kimpe, N. (2001) Biotransformation of (R)-(+)- and (S)-Limonene by Fungi and Use of Solid Phase Microextraction for Screening. Phytochemistry, 57, 199-208.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00499-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barra, A., Coroneo, V., Dessi, S., Cabras, P. and Angioni, A. (2010) Chemical Variability, Antifungal and Antioxidant Activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Essential Oil from Sardinia. Natural Product Communications, 5, 329-335.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1000500232</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engonga, O.L.C., Koudou, J., Chalchat, J.C., Bassolé, I., Edou, P., Ouattara, A.S. and Traore, A. (2007) Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Canarium schweifurthii Engl. Essential Oil from Centrafrican Republic. Scientific Research and Essays, 6, 2319-2323. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soares, D.G., Andreazza, A.C. and Salvador, M. (2003) Sequestering Ability of Butylated Hydroxytoluene, Propyl Gallate, Resveratrol, and Vitamins C and E against ABTS, DPPH, and Hydroxyl Free Radicals in Chemical and Biological Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 1077-1080.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, L., Haley, S., Perret, J., Harris, M., Wilson, J. and Qian, M. (2002) Free Radical Scavenging Properties of Wheat Extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 1619-1624. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010964p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dontha, S. (2016) A Review on Antioxidant Methods. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 9, 14-32.  
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9s2.13092</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhami, A., Singh, A., Palariya, D., Kumar, R., Prakash, O., Rawat, D.S. and Pant, A.K. (2019) α-Pinene Rich Bark Essential Oils of Zanthoxylum armatum DC. from Three Different Altitudes of Uttarakhand, India and Their Antioxidant, in Vitro Anti-Inflammatory and Antibacterial Activity. Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants, 3, 660-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2019.1630015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Safaei-Ghomi, J., Ebrahimabadi, A.H., Djafari-Bidgoli, Z. and Batooli, H. (2009) GC/MS Analysis and in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oil and Methanol Extracts of Thymus caramanicus Jalas and Its Main Constituent Carvacrol. Food Chemistry, 115, 1524-1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108053-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benyoucef, F., El Amine, D.M., Arrar, Z., Costa, J. and Muselli, A. (2018) Synergistic Antioxidant Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Thymus fontanesii, Artemisia herbaalba and Rosmarinus offcinalis. Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, 4, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.29252/JABR.05.04.03</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>