<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2021.134016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-108011</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Seasonal Variation and Removal of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater Using Low-Cost Treatment Technologies in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Felix</surname><given-names>K. Abagale</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>West African Centre for Water, Irrigation and Sustainable Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>282</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The use of wastewater as alternative source of water for vegetable crop irrigation has become an eminent component of urban agriculture due to current global water crises in most developing countries, and admits the increasing effects of global climate change. The practise is however noted to be associated with significant health and environment risk due to excessive pollutant load. The study assessed the level of seasonal variation and removal of organic pollutants in wastewater using gravel filters combined with stabilisation ponds at Zagyuri in the Tamale Metropolis. The yard scale experiment consisted of cylindrical containers of different length filled with six different sizes of filter media and connected to stabilisation ponds where wastewater is allowed to pass through for filtration and stabilisation. The results indicated that for both seasons, the average concentration of BOD released into the stream at Zagyuri was 92.98 mg/l and 103.54 mg/l for the dry and wet season respectively whilst the COD was averaged 132.78 mg/l and 143.75 mg/l for the dry and wet seasons respectively. The results of the simple linear regression revealed a strong positive linear relationship between BOD and COD with coefficient of determination (R
  <sup>2</sup>) of 0.873 which was statistically highly significantly at 
  <em>Pr</em> 
  <em>value</em> of &lt;0.0001. The results for ANOVA for the treatment factor were statistically highly significant at 
  <em>Pr values</em> of 0.0011 and &lt;0.0001 respectively for BOD
  <sub>5</sub> and COD. The average concentration of BOD was higher than the Ghana EPA recommended levels while that of COD was lower and thus within safety range for discharge into the environment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Organic Pollutant</kwd><kwd> BOD5</kwd><kwd> COD</kwd><kwd> Wastewater</kwd><kwd> Treatment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Despite the increasing effects of climate change coupled with intermittent water scarcity, alternative use of wastewater for vegetable crop irrigation has become an integral component of urban agriculture, especially in most developing countries where demand for all year-round vegetable production is eminent. According to McDonald et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref1">1</xref>], over 150 million urban dwellers live with perennial water shortage. Global usage of untreated wastewater is estimated at 15 million m<sup>3</sup>/day by over 200 million farmers and provides food of almost 10% of the global population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref2">2</xref>]. Tamale metropolis located in the Guinea-savannah ecological zone, experiences a prolonged dry season due to the unimodal rainfall pattern and thus described as poorly endowed with waterbodies where the few seasonal streams completely dry up during the dry season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref3">3</xref>]. The practise of wastewater irrigation thus remains the sole option for vegetable farmers to supplement the year-round water demand for vegetable production.</p><p>Despite the important contribution to food security, application of untreated wastewater however poses severe risk to public health and the environment due to excessive pollutant concentration and contaminant load. The raw wastewater usually from domestic or industrial sources is characterised by excessive organic pollution and usually found beyond allowable threshold for safe discharge or reuse. Kulabako et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref4">4</xref>] mentioned that increase production of organic effluents due to rapid industrial growth poses severe environmental risk. Pollution of the limited water resources by the organic constitutes from the different sources of industrialization, agricultural activities and global environmental changes presents a major issue of concern due to the high toxicity levels and carcinogenic nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>According to Sasse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>] reported that Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) is a general parameter in measuring organic pollution and it describes how much oxygen is required in the oxidation of all organic and inorganic matter found in water. The author indicated that Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) describes the fraction of COD that can be oxidised biologically by bacteria. According to Strauss et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref7">7</xref>] in tropical countries, COD levels range from 500 - 2500 mg/l with a COD/BOD ratio of 2:1 in sewage. Kulabako et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref4">4</xref>] and Sall et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref8">8</xref>] mentioned that the strength of wastewater can be categorised as high strength based on its high COD concentration (&gt;2 g/l).</p><p>Treatment of wastewater in aerobic ponds is possible with a BOD<sub>5</sub> content below 300 mg/l and a limit of 50 mg/l must be taken before being discharged into the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>]. Tchobanoglous and Burton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref9">9</xref>] and G&#252;ller et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref2">2</xref>] indicated that the most widely used parameter of organic pollution for both wastewater and surface water is 5-day BOD. The universal application of BOD<sub>5</sub> and COD for evaluation of organic pollutants and efficiency of wastewater treatment plants was also noted by Lee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref10">10</xref>]. Nonetheless reduction of organic pollution in wastewater by low-cost treatment technologies is critical in ensuring that levels are within safety limits for potential reuse, protection of the environment and public health. Simple technologies which operate with basic natural principles such as filtration and stabilisation are thus paramount. In this regard, filtration where wastewater is allowed to pass through a thick layer of sand is noted as a fundamental stage for water purification. The effect of filtration as noted for a significant removal of suspended and colloidal impurities, bacterial load and alteration of the chemical characteristics of wastewater, is principally based on the actions of mechanical straining, biological metabolism and sedimentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref11">11</xref>]. Waste Stabilisation pond is mentioned as the most important treatment method in developing countries where the temperature is most favourable for their operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref12">12</xref>]. They function as holding basins for secondary wastewater treatment where natural decomposition of organic matter occurs by complex symbiosis of bacteria and algae to a more stable and less offensive forms after a considerable retention time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref13">13</xref>]. They are thus simple, low-cost and low-maintenance option for treating wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref14">14</xref>]. The study monitored the effect of seasonal variation on the concentration of the organic pollutants and as well tested the effect of gravel filters combined with pilot-scale stabilisation ponds as a low-cost treatment option for wastewater in the metropolis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The Tamale Metropolitan area is located at the centre of the Northern Region of Ghana. Tamale has been described as the fastest growing city in West Africa and it is the largest urban centre in the north of Ghana. It occupies 750 km<sup>2</sup> which is 13% of the total area of the Northern Region. The population of Tamale Metropolis is reported as 371,351 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref15">15</xref>]. The Metropolis experiences one rainy season starting from April/May to September/October with a peak period in July/August. The dry season is usually from November to March. The mean annual rainfall is 1100 mm within 95 days of intense rainfall. The mean day temperatures range from 33˚C to 39˚C while mean night temperature range from 20˚C to 22˚C and with the mean annual day sunshine is approximately 7.5 hours.</p><p>In the Metropolis there are several sites where wastewater vegetable farming takes place and the crops cultivated include cabbage, lettuce, Amaranthus, Chochorus and others. This study was done in the Zagyuri community of the Tamale Metropolis where community farmers numbering about 150 farmers and their families of averagely 5 members per household depend on the use of wastewater from a broken-down sewer of the Kamina Military Barracks for vegetable crop production. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> is a map of Ghana and the Tamale Metropolitan Area. The study area according to Obuobie et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref16">16</xref>] is 8 km from the city centre and covers according to different sources in total about 7 - 12 ha. The experimental field was located on latitude 09˚47'388''N, longitude 00˚84'776''W and at an altitude of 167 m above sea level.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Filter Unit and Experimental Designs</title><p>The study designed and used eighteen cylindrical containers each with a diameter of 6.5 cm of varying lengths. Each horizontal sand filter unit was designed and fabricated to contain the following:</p><p>A mosquito netting at inflow and outflow ends to sieve out debris to prevent clogging.</p><p>The cylindrical shaped container set-up was made of one container only (8.5 cm length), two containers only (17 cm length) and three containers only (25.5 cm length) and serially connected to stabilization ponds.</p><p>Stabilization ponds were built at 2 m &#215; 7 m with a staircase design at 1 m interval for 2 m at intake point of the tank unit with the remaining 4.5 m being the depth of the stabilization pond.</p><p>Cement and concrete blocks were used for the construction of a staircase connecting the filter units to the stabilization ponds and the water source.</p><p>The experiment had three (3) treatments:</p><p>• Treatment one (T<sub>1</sub>) where the length of the filtering container was 8.5 cm,</p><p>• Treatment two (T<sub>2</sub>) where the length of the filtering container was 17 cm,</p><p>• Treatment three (T<sub>3</sub>) where the length of the filtering container was 25.5 cm, and</p><p>• The Control (Main Source, MS) where the wastewater was without any filtration.</p><p>The experimental layout was aided by the completely randomised design (CRD) where each treatment had three (3) replications (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Each filtering unit was filled with six (6) different sizes of the filter media as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Stabilization ponds of dimensions 2 m &#215; 7 m were created to harvest the filtered wastewater from the various treatment set-ups. Wastewater from the Kamina Barracks sewage system was directed to the constructed treatment system. Wastewater samples were taken from each of the ponds and the main source to the laboratory for quality analysis. Three sampling repetitions at weekly intervals was analysed for eight weeks in both wet and dry seasons.</p><p>Concentration of COD was determined by the Close Reﬂux Dichromate Reduction Method while BOD was by Five days of incubation at 20˚C with Oxytop head gas sensors in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref18">18</xref>] Standard Methods for examination of wastewater and sludge.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>The average concentrations of the organic pollutants were subjected to trend analysis on weekly basis. Statistical significance for the variation among treatments and the sampling seasons were determined by Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) while relationship between the parameters was determined by Pearson’s correlation at 5% level of significance. Separation of means was by</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Filter media sizes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Layer</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Filter Media Size (mm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Topmost</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Second</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Third</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fourth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lowest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey Pairwise Comparisons method. Relationship between average concentration of BOD<sub>5</sub> and COD was determined by simple linear regression at 95% confidence interval whilst GraphPad Prism 8 was used for the data analysis and plotting of graphs.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Variation of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD<sub>5</sub>) in Wastewater</title><p>The level of BOD<sub>5</sub> for the MS averaged 92.98 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) (ranged from 55 to 159.1 mg/l) for the dry season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The treatment effects were widely effective in the reduction of BOD<sub>5</sub> to a minimum of 56.34 mg/l for T<sub>3</sub> indicating that the activity of micro-organisms in the degradation of the organic component of the wastewater reduced greatly with increase in length of the filter column (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). As length of filter unit increased, micro-organisms which demand higher level of oxygen for oxidation of organic matter contained in the wastewater were filtered out. Micro-organisms concentration therefore corresponded well with the length of the filter unit. Weekly variation of BOD<sub>5</sub> concentration in the dry season is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a).</p><p>In the wet season however, the concentration of the BOD<sub>5</sub> for the MS averaged 103.54 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) and ranged from 47.1 to 191.7 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The results indicate that the wet season was favourable for the activity of the micro-organisms responsible for the degradation of organic matter. It is therefore evident that the effect of environmental factors on the micro-organism’s activity influenced the concentration of BOD in the wastewater. BOD<sub>5</sub> concentration in the main source varied widely in the wet season and sometimes falling below the concentrations of the treatments. Dilution effect of rainwater could therefore be a contributory factor in the level of BOD concentration. Length of filter column was also realised to affect the BOD levels especially in week eight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). The environmental conditions together with filter length favoured the growth and activity of micro-organisms in the oxidation of organic matter contained in the wastewater. The results of ANOVA showed significant difference for variation among treatments at probability value (Pr value) of 0.0011 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), however the difference was realized for between the average concentration of MS and</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> ANOVA for concentration of BOD<sub>5</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source of Variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of Total Variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr Value Summary</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ns</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seasonal Variation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.736</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2564</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ns</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Pr Value: Probability value; **level of significant difference; ns: no significant difference.</p><p>T<sub>3</sub> of the dry season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). According to L. Sasse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>], receiving waters should be able to tolerate effluent standards of between 30 to 70 mg/l BOD. Meanwhile the Ghana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows for a maximum BOD discharge limit of 50 mg/l into the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref19">19</xref>]. These higher values, however, indicate that the micro-organisms are active in the degradation process of the organic matter as low BOD was noted to indicate low level of the activity of biodegradable bacteria contained in the wastewater. Organic pollution of wastewater and surface water has been reported as the 5-day BOD (BOD<sub>5</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref20">20</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Variation of Chemical Oxygen Demand in Wastewater</title><p>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of the MS ranged from 105.15 to 205.90 mg/l for the dry season with an average COD of 132.78 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>Except in Week 7 when the COD concentration of T<sub>1</sub> was slightly higher than the main source, the COD of the various weeks of the main source was observed to be generally higher than the treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)). Similar to BOD<sub>5</sub>, the length of filter unit was also observed to affect the level to which the COD was reduced to a minimum concentration of 76.63 mg/l for T<sub>3</sub> in the dry season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>In the wet season, however, concentration of COD for MS ranged from 102.5 mg/l to 203.00 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)) with an average concentration of 143.75 mg/l. Even though the limits were below that of the dry season, the average concentration of COD for the wet season was observed to be higher than that of the dry season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). A similar trend of concentration of COD in the wet season like that of the dry season was observed.</p><p>Reduction of COD concentration in wastewater by the different treatment units was statistically highly significant at Pr value of &lt;0.000.1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The difference however was found between MS and all the treatments with the exception of T<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Generally, this trend indicated that T<sub>3</sub> was effective in reducing the level of COD contained in the wastewater. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>] noted that, for COD, the final effluent standards for discharge into receiving waters may tolerate from 100 to 200 mg/l while the Ghana EPA recommends a maximum discharge limit of 250 mg/l [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref19">19</xref>]. The average concentration of COD at the study area was thus within safe range for discharge.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Linear Relationship between BOD and COD</title><p>The results of the simple linear regression revealed a strong positive linear relationship between BOD and COD with coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.873 which was statistically highly significantly at Pr value of &lt;0.0001 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The results as presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> indicate that 81.73 % of the variability of average BOD in the wastewater at the study area is influenced by the concentration of COD. The model equation for the relation was found to be y = 0.147 + 0.763x with x and y representing COD and BOD<sub>5</sub> respectively which implies that in the given range of the variable of COD in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> a unit increase in COD will result to an increase of average BOD by 0.76. A highly positive correlation coefficients between 0.81 to 0.93 was reported for brewery effluent in Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref20">20</xref>]. This implies that the concentration of BOD in wastewater effluent is significantly influence by that of the COD and thus treatment options should help reduce their levels to established threshold limits for safe discharge to avoid organic pollution in the environment and grantee potential reuse for agriculture.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. COD/BOD Ratio</title><p>The COD/BOD ratio vaguely relates total oxidisable matter to organic matter which is first degraded by the most common bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>]. The ratio between COD and BOD<sub>5</sub> for the dry and wet seasons indicated that except for Week 4 of the wet season which recorded a COD/BOD<sub>5</sub> ratio of 2.52, the remaining weeks were below a ratio of 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Easily degradable wastewater has a COD/BOD<sub>5</sub></p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> ANOVA for concentration of COD</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source of Variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of Total Variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr Value Summary</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ns</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seasonal Variation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4606</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ns</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Pr Value: Probability value; **level of significant difference; ns: no significant difference.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Model parameters for concentration of BOD</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Error</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr &gt; |t|</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Bound (95%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Upper Bound (95%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intercept</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.682</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.975</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.854</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Ratio of COD/BOD<sub>5</sub> of wastewater of the treatment units</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Week</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dry Season</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Wet Season</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>relation of about 2. The COD/BOD ratio widens after biological treatment, because BOD is biologically degradable. A weak wastewater from domestic sources may have a COD below 500 mg/l while a strong industrial wastewater may contain up to 80,000 mg/l BOD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref6">6</xref>]. Andrio et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.108011-ref21">21</xref>] however mentioned the case of BOD<sub>5</sub>/COD as also an important relationship for understanding of biodegradability in wastewater and noted a minimum and optimal values of 0.4 and &lt;0.5 respectively for easy biodegradability.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The results indicated that for both seasons, the average concentration of BOD released into the stream at Zagyuri was 92.98 mg/l and 103.54 mg/l for the dry and wet seasons respectively whilst the COD was averaged 132.78 mg/l and 143.75 mg/l for the dry and wet seasons respectively.</p><p>The treatment effects were widely effective in the reduction of both parameters as the degradation of the organic component of the wastewater reduced greatly with increase in length of the filter column. The treatment factor thus showed to be statistically significant for both parameters. The results of simple linear regression revealed a strong positive linear relationship between average concentration of BOD and COD which was statistically highly significantly at Pr value of &lt;0.0001. The average concentration of BOD was higher than the Ghana EPA recommended levels while that of COD was lower and thus within safety range for discharge. The indication of the concentration means that the wet season was favourable for the activity of the micro-organisms responsible for the degradation of the organic matter.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I would like to thank the following persons for supporting this work during the fieldwork and laboratory analysis of wastewater samples: Richard Osei Agyemang, Stephen Alenga, Patrick K. Antwi, and Emmanuel Nyadzi.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Abagale, F.K. (2021) Seasonal Variation and Removal of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater Using Low-Cost Treatment Technologies in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 13, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2021.134016</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.108011-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrio, D., Asmura, J., Yenie, E. and Putri, K. (2019) Enhancing BOD5/COD Ratio Co-Substrate Tofu Wastewater and Cow Dung during Ozone Pre-Treatment. MATEC Web of Conferences, 276, Article No. 06027. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927606027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Attiogbe, F.K., Glover-Amengor, M. and Nyadziehe, K.T. (2007) Correlating Biochemical and Chemical Oxygen Demand of Effluents—A Case Study of Selected Industries in Kumasi, Ghana. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.4314/wajae.v11i1.45722</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Owusu-Ansah, E.D.G.J., Sampson, A., Amponsah, S.K., Abaidoo, R.C. and Hald, T. (2015) Performance, Compliance and Reliability of Waste Stabilization Pond: Effluent Discharge Quality and Environmental Protection Agency Standards in Ghana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abagale, F.K., Kyei-Baffour, N., Ofori, E. and Mensah, E. (2013) Types and Seasonal Diversity of Helminth Eggs in Wastewater Used for Peri-Urban Vegetable Crop Production in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. International Journal of Current Research, 5, 3354-3359.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obuobie, E., Keraita, B., Danso, G., Amoah, P., Cofie, O.O., Raschid-Sally, L. and Drechsel, P. (2006) Irrigated Urban Vegetable Production in Ghana: Characteristics, Benefits and Risks. IWMI-RUAF-CPWF, IWMI, Accra, 150 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghana Statistical Service (2013) 2010 Population and Housing Census National Analytical Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, K.L., Cisneros, B.J., Tchobanoglous, G. and Darby, J.L. (2004) Sludge Accumulation, Characteristics and Pathogen Inactivation in Four Primary Waste Stabilization Ponds in Central Mexico. Water Research, 38, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yvonne, L. (2012) Design of Sewage Treatment System for Gulu University. A Project Report, Gulu University, Gulu.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mara, D. (2004) Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. Earthscan, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rangwala, S.C., Rangwala, K.S. and Rangwala, P.S. (2007) Water Supply and Sanitary Engineering. Charotar Publishing House, Anand, 200-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J., Lee, S., Yu, S. and Rhew, D. (2016) Relationships between Water Quality Parameters in Rivers and Lakes: BOD5, COD, NBOPs, and TOC. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188, 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5251-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchobanoglous, G. and Burton, F.L. (1995) Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. 3rd Edition, Metcalf and Eddy Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sall, O. and Takakashi, Y. (2006) Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Stored Grey Water from Unsewered Sun-Urban Dakar in Senegal. Urban Water Journal, 3, 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620600961387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strauss, M., Larmie, S.A. and Heinss, U. (1997) Treatment of Sludges from On-Site Sanitation: Low-Cost Options. Water Science and Technology, 35, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sasse, L. (1998) Decentralised Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. A Publication of BORDA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, I., Asim, M. and Khan, T.A. (2012) Low-Cost Adsorbents for the Removal of Organic Pollutants from Wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kulabako, N.R., Ssonko, N.K.M. and Kinobe, J. (2011) Greywater Characteristics and Reuse in Tower Gardens in Peri-Urban Areas—Experiences of Kawaala, Kampala, Uganda. The Open Environmental Engineering Journal, 4, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874829501104010147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drechsel, P., Scott, C.A., Raschid-Sally, L., Redwood, M. and Bahri, A. (2010) Wastewater Irrigation and Health: Assessing and Mitigating Risk in Low-Income Countries. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo; Earthscan, London; International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, 404 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Güller, S., Silahtaroglu, G. and Akpolat, O. (2019) Analysis Wastewater Characteristics via Data Mining: A Mugla Province Case and External Validation. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 5, 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2019.1604192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.108011-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McDonald, R.I., Green, P., Balk, D., Fekete, B.M., Revenga, C., Todd, M. and Montgomery, M. (2011) Urban Growth, Climate Change and Freshwater Availability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 6312-6317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011615108</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>