<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Health</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Health</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-4998</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/health.2021.132013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Health-107288</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Vestibular Function Evaluation in Endemic Diseases Combat Agents
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patrícia</surname><given-names>Arruda de Souza Alcarás</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bianca</surname><given-names>Simone Zeigelboim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>Cristina Alves Corazza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Débora</surname><given-names>Lüders</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jair</surname><given-names>Mendes Marques</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adriana</surname><given-names>Bender Moreira de Lacerda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Tuiuti University of Paraná, UTP, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>University of Western S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Université de Montréal, UdeM, Quebec, Canada</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>02</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>144</fpage><lpage>156</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Simultaneous exposure to certain chemical agents and noise may cause synergistic, additive or potentiating effects on the auditory and vestibular system. However, there is still a lack of studies investigating simultaneous exposure to pesticides and noise in the vestibular system. 
  Purpose: To analyze the findings of the vestibular evaluation of endemic diseases combat agents when simultaneously exposed to pesticides and noise. 
  Method: Thirty-three male pesticide-exposed and noise-fighting endemic diseases combat agents participated in the study. The age range was 48 to 67 years (mean = 56 years). All participants underwent vestibular examinations, such as positional nystagmus research, spontaneous nystagmus with open and closed eyes, semi-spontaneous nystagmus, optokinetic nystagmus, pendular screening, per rotatory, caloric tests and tonal audiometry. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. 
  Results: Altered exams were presented in 36.4% of the cases. There was no statistically significant relationship between pesticide handling time and test results (p = 0.2825). The results of pure tone audiometry correlated significantly (p = 0.0494) with the vestibular exams, as participants who presented with worse hearing thresholds at the frequency of 4000 Hz in the right ear also presented altered results in the vestibular exam.
   Conclusion: The present study concluded that more than 1/3 of the studied population presented with vestibular dysfunction, which was related to anterior and posterior labyrinth alteration (Cochlear-Vestibular Syndrome). No central vestibular alteration was noted in this population.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Community Health Workers</kwd><kwd> Pesticides</kwd><kwd> Noise</kwd><kwd> Hearing</kwd><kwd> Vestibular System</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The endemic diseases combat agents (EDCA) are professionals who work in public health preventing and fighting diseases present in the environment, such as dengue fever, Chagas’ disease, leishmaniasis, and malaria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref1">1</xref>]. Their job includes inspecting houses, empty lots, warehouses, and commercial establishments, searching for outbreaks of endemic diseases. They also manipulate and apply larvicides and insecticides to fight vectors and instruct the population regarding the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The co-exposure to physical and chemical risks are occupational hazards that must be considered regarding this profession. Authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref3">3</xref>] reported that the EDCA are the health professionals most exposed to pesticides, as they are exposed to it from preparing the solution to applying it. The contamination may be through skin absorption and breathing, especially among the agents that spray the pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref4">4</xref>]. However, they are not exposed to pesticides alone, but also to noise from the automatic pump sprayers and heavy ultra-low volume (ULV) sprayers. Although the noise level is reported in a few studies related to pesticide exposure, its assessment is advisable.</p><p>Besides the occupational risks related to physical and chemical agents, there are also the ergonomic, social, biological, and accident risks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Regarding the damages to health, a study pointed out that the main diseases and symptoms reported by the EDCA are the risks of skin cancer, pain from work-related repetitive strain injury and musculoskeletal disorders, as well as the risks of headache and dizziness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Studies have shown damage to the peripheral and central auditory system of populations exposed to pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref14">14</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref25">25</xref>]. However, in most studies, the noise was either not present or its exposure was not considered. In addition, some studies have addressed the effects of pesticides on the vestibular system in humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref26">26</xref>] and in guinea pigs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the vestibular functions in endemic diseases combat agents.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Type and Location of the Study</title><p>This descriptive, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at a speech language pathology clinic in southern Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Ethical Issues</title><p>This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Worker’s Hospital/SES/PR by Plataforma Brasil, protocol number 1.242.014. Please be informed that all ethical precepts have been respected.</p><p>The Informed Consent Forms (ICF) were obtained during interviews conducted individually, in a private room, while safeguarding the identity and integrity of each participant. All participants were informed on the objectives and procedures of the research, and freely and spontaneously signed the informed consent form, without the burden of participation and with the freedom to withdraw at any time.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Population</title><p>The selected population was public employees of the State of Paran&#225; who work in campaigns to combat vectors present in the environment.</p><p>An invitation was sent by the Syndicate to all public employees of the state. After freely accepting to participate in the study, the employees were sent, on pre-scheduled dates, to a clinic in the south of the country.</p><p>Thus, the population sample consisted of 33 male EDCA, aged 48 to 67 years (mean = 56 years; SD = 5.3), occupationally exposed to pesticides (organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides), and noise generated by automatic pesticide sprayers on average for 31.33 years (range of exposure from 20 to 42 years).</p><p>Usually, the morning shift with heavy ULV goes from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., possibly extending up to 10:00 a.m. The afternoon shift goes from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., possibly extending up to 10:00 p.m. Workers are exposed to risk agents for six to 10 hours a day on average, besides the time they take maintaining the equipment preparing the substances.</p><p>As for the backpack ULV, the time of exposure can reach eight hours a day, avoiding the intense sun hours. However, according to information from the place that sent the pesticide- and noise-exposed workers, the time of exposure to the risk agents ranged from four to six hours a day.</p><p>According to the information provided by the XXX, the equivalent mean level of motorized backpack pumps is 107 dBA/4 hours (Leq decibel in weighting A for four hours), while the vehicle-coupled heavy Ultra Low Volume (ULV) generates a 75 dBA/4 hours noise inside the vehicle with closed windows and 110 dBA/4 hours outside the vehicle.</p><p>In addition to noise exposure, participants reported exposure to organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides, as well as a history of past exposure to other types of pesticides, such as organochlorines, carbamates, and larvicides.</p><p>Regarding the use of personal protective equipment, 27 (82%) EDCA reported using hearing protectors during work activities. In addition to hearing protectors, workers reported wearing a breathing mask, disposable clothing, hats, boots, waterproof gloves, and goggles. Tasks performed by the agents included pesticide preparation, application, and material cleaning after application. The application of pesticides involved spraying the poison through the backpack pump, hand pump, and tracked vehicles.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Procedures</title><p>All the participants were submitted to a vestibular assessment to verify the existence of vestibular disorders and tonal audiometry after an inspection of the external ear canal was conducted with the MD Mark II model otoscope.</p><p>The vestibular function evaluation was performed on a single day in the morning, with groups of 3 to 4 workers per day/evaluated. In total, there were six months for data collection, which is performed every fifteen days, on Fridays, from 7:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.</p><p>The vestibular function evaluation is composed of many labyrinthine function and ocular tests. The first part of the evaluation was clinical and consisted of a systematic search for spontaneous, gaze, and positional nystagmus (Brandt &amp; Daroff’s maneuver).</p><p>We have used the vector electronystagmography (VENG), model VN316 (Berger Eletromedicina Ltda., S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil), a Ferrante COD 14,200 rotating chair with a rotation of 0.01 to 0.5 Hz, (Ferrante, S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil), an EV VEC visual stimulator (Neurograff Eletromedicina Ltda., S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil), and an air NGR 05 caloric stimulator (Neurograff Eletromedicina Ltda., S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil). The ﬂow rate used was of 5 and 13 L/min. Next, we conducted the eye and labyrinth VEG tests, according to the criteria proposed by authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>We veriﬁed spontaneous and gaze nystagmus, the oscillatory tracking test, optokinetic nystagmus search, and rotatory and caloric tests. Were corded the caloric stimulation time in each ear using air at 42˚C and 18˚C for 80 seconds for each temperature, and responses with closed eyes and then with open eyes to observe the inhibitory effect of eye ﬁxation (IEEF). The criteria used in the air caloric test were: absolute value between 2 and 24 degrees/second, with &lt;2 degrees/second corresponding to hyporeﬂexia; and with &gt;24 degrees/second corresponding to hyperreﬂexia; relative values of labyrinth preponderance (LP) &lt; 41% and nystagmus directional pre-ponderance (NDP) &lt; 36% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref30">30</xref>].</p><p>The patterns used to determine vestibular exam findings are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>In order to determine the hearing threshold of the study participants, all participants underwent tonal audiometry in addition to the vestibular assessment. Tonal audiometry was performed using the Madsen<sup>&#174;</sup> Itera II audiometer (GN Otometrics S/A Denmark). The device was calibrated. A TDH-39 headset was adopted. The B-71 vibrator was used as needed for bone tonal thresholds.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Data were statistically analyzed descriptively, using the Fisher-Exact test and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney statistical test, with a significance level of 0.05 (5%). The prevalence rate and the prevalence ratio were used as needed to verify the occurrence of altered examinations in the population. The prevalence rate was used to verify the occurrence of altered cases. This type of statistical analysis was used because it is a cross-sectional study. Analyses were performed on the BioEstat 5.0.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Thirty-three (33) EDCA performed the vestibular evaluations; 36.3% of them</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Normal standards and criteria used to analyze the vestibular tests and distinguish central from peripheral</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Normal Vestibular Exam</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peripheral Vestibular Exam</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Central Vestibular Exam</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positional nystagmus (Brandt &amp; Daroff’s maneuver)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present (rotatory, horizontal rotatory and oblique) with latency, paroxysm, weariness, and vertigo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present (vertical, rotatory, horizontal rotatory, and oblique), without latency, paroxysm, weariness, and vertigo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calibration of the ocular movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irregular (alterations in latency, accuracy, and velocity of the saccadic movements)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spontaneous nystagmus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present (&lt;7 degrees/sec) with closed eyes; absent with open eyes.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present (&gt;7 degrees/sec) with closed eyes; absent with open eyes.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present with open eyes (vertical, rotatory, horizontal rotatory, oblique, cyclic, dissociated, and retractor)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gaze nystagmus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present, unidirectional, bidirectional, or mixed; presents a variety of nystagmus types</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oscillatory track test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Types I and II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type IV (pathognomonic); alterations of morphology and gain</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Optokinetic nystagmus test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Symmetrical, &lt;20 degrees/sec</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asymmetrical, &gt;20 degrees/sec, having superposed spontaneous nystagmus with open eyes that justifies this alteration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asymmetrical, &gt;20 degrees/sec, absent and reduced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rotatory test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;33%, after stimulation of the lateral and upper semicircular ducts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;33%, after stimulation of the lateral and upper semicircular ducts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;33%, after stimulation of the lateral and upper semicircular ducts and absence of induced oblique nystagmus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Air caloric test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute value: between 2 and 24 degrees/sec Relative values: Labyrinth preponderance &lt;41% Nystagmus directional preponderance &lt;36%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute value: &lt;2 degrees/sec (hyporeflexia), &gt;24 degrees/sec (hyperreflexia) and areflexia Relative values: Labyrinth preponderance &gt;41% Nystagmus directional preponderance &gt;36% (Jongkees formula)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute value: &lt;2 degrees/sec (hyporeflexia), &gt;24 degrees/sec (hyperreflexia) and areflexia Relative values: Labyrinth preponderance &gt;41% Nystagmus directional preponderance &gt;36% (Jongkees formula). Different nystagmus types may be observed: dissociated, inverted, perverted, and absence of the fast component of the nystagmus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibiting effect of ocular fixation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: Authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref30">30</xref>].</p><p>had alterations in the exams, of which 5 (15.2%) presented with right peripheral vestibular deficit dysfunction and 4 (12.1%) with left peripheral vestibular deficit dysfunction. Irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction was observed in 9% of the cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Statistical analysis revealed p = 12/33 = 0.364, demonstrating prevalence rate of altered results.</p><p>The ages of EDCA were separated into three age groups: up to 50 years old, from 51 to 60 years old, and over 60 years old. The proportion of normal cases is higher (75%), with 25% being the proportion of altered cases (up to 50 years). Among agents aged between 51 and 60 years, the proportion of normal cases dropped to 70% and that of altered cases increased to 30%. Among agents over the age of 60, the proportion of normal cases was very low (20%), while the proportion of altered cases increased to 80%. When correlating the results of vestibular exams with the age of the participants, Fisher’s exact statistical test</p><p>showed no relationship, since the p-value = 0.1132.</p><p>The results show of the vestibular evaluations took into account the handling time of the pesticide. A higher proportion of normal cases (70%) among participants with shorter exposure time (up to 30 years) was noted, however, when comparing the exposure time to pesticides, up to 30 years and with more than 30 years of exposure, the Fisher’s Exact test showed that the result was not significant at a significance level (p = 0.2825).</p><p>The following researchers showed no changes: positional nystagmus, eye movement calibration, spontaneous open-eyed and gaze nystagmus, pendular tracking test, optokinetic and post-rotational nystagmus. Observed changes occurred in the spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus research and in the caloric test. Twelve individuals (36.3%) presented with peripheral vestibular dysfunctions, nine cases with deficitary peripheral vestibular dysfunction (27.3%), and three cases (9%) with irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction. The vestibular examination was normal in 21 cases (63.7%).</p><p>Nystagmus was observed in seven participants in the spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus study. The prevalence rate of spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus was 21.2% and the prevalence ratio was 2.3; hence, the presence of spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus among participants who presented alterations in the vestibular evaluations was twice as high as among participants who presented no alterations. However, through Fisher’s Exact test, there was no statistically significant relationship between the altered tests and the spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus results (p = 0.1970).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the auditory and vestibular complaints presented by the study participants. It is noted that 30.3% of participants complained of tinnitus and dizziness, and 33.3% complained of hypoacusis.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between vestibular examination result and complaint (N = 33)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Results</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tinnitus</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hipoacousis</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dizziness</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No n (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (60.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (65.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (72.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (59.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (60.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (65.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RPDVD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (10.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (17.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (9.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (18.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (30.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (8.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LPDVD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (20.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (8.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (9.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (13.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (17.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IPVD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (10.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (9.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (10.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RIPVD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LIPVD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.5366</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.3522</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.5366</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: NVE = normal vestibular exam; RPDVD = right peripheral deficit vestibular dysfunction; LPDVD = left peripheral deficit vestibular dysfunction; IPVD = irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction; RIPVD = right irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction; LIPVD = left irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction.</p><p>Fisher’s Exact test, at a significance level of 0.05 (5%), revealed no significant relationship between the vestibular examination results and the complaints, when the two were compared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the results obtained in pure tone audiometry with the results obtained in the vestibular exams. The Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, at a significance level of 5% (0.05), showed a significant difference between the thresholds for the right ear at the frequency of 4000 Hz (p = 0.0494). Therefore, the participants who presented worse hearing thresholds in the right ear at the frequency of 4000 Hz also presented altered results in the vestibular examinations.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The vestibular evaluation findings showed alterations in the exams in 36.3% of the endemic diseases combat agents. Among the participants, 15.2% had exams</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship of conventional audiometry with vestibular examination results (N = 33)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ear and frequence (Hz)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >NVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >AVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7363</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1117</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0516</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0588</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1249</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE4000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*0.0494</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0996</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE8000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0588</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6266</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4542</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8958</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3213</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE4000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3399</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3998</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LE8000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3592</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: RE = right ear; LE = left ear; NVE = normal vestibular exam; AVE = altered vestibular exam. Non-parametric Test Mann-Whitney (p = value significant*).</p><p>suggestive of right deficitary peripheral vestibular dysfunction and 12.1% suggestive of left deficitary peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction was observed in 9% of the cases. These findings point to the fact that all exam deficits due to vestibular dysfunction were peripheral.</p><p>Peripheral vestibular dysfunction is characterized by changes in normal patterns and the absence of signs of dysfunction indicating a central lesion. Deficitary peripheral vestibular dysfunctions are correlated with vestibular alterations where there is a total or partial decrease in vestibular function, and generally have a worse prognosis compared to irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunctions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>The results did not show alterations in the positional nystagmus, eye movement calibration, spontaneous and gaze nystagmus, pendular tracking test, optokinetic and rotational nystagmus. However, the alterations were observed in the caloric test and the survey of spontaneous closed eyes nystagmus. Alterations in the caloric test were observed in a study with populations exposed to pesticides, as well as in the research of positional nystagmus and/or vertigo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>]. The result of this last test was not observed in the present study.</p><p>Some authors report that the only vestibular test that evaluates each maze is caloric, being a valuable resource for otoneurological diagnosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref32">32</xref>]. It consists of the stimulation of the external ear canal by introducing hot/cold air/water, which heats and cools the lateral semicircular canal wall, generating endolymph convection currents and promoting deviation of the stimulated semicircular canal dome.</p><p>All participants presented only with alternations in the spontaneous closed-eye nystagmus, with no alterations in the spontaneous open-eye nystagmus and the gaze nystagmus. This indicated that none presented central alteration. In the spontaneous closed-eye nystagmus survey, 7 participants presented with the same, 3 presented with a normal vestibular exam, and 4 with alteration in vestibular exams. The presence of spontaneous closed-eye nystagmus can be observed in healthy individuals. Spontaneous closed-eye nystagmus in healthy individuals can be considered normal if the result of the slow component angular velocity (SCAV) does not exceed 7˚/s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref30">30</xref>]. Only one participant presented SCAV above 7˚/s, whose right horizontal spontaneous closed-eye nystagmus result associated with the caloric test result (right labyrinthine predominance 9%) showed irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction.</p><p>In a study, irritative peripheral vestibular dysfunction was observed in 88.8% of 18 rural workers exposed to organophosphate insecticide-type pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>]. A study showed the population exposed to various types of pesticides with varying degrees of toxicity, such as Manzate (54.2%), which has toxicology grade III, Folidol (33.3%), Tamaron (27.1%), and Gramaxone (25%), that has a type I toxicology degree and considered highly toxic. Most of the studied population was female (72.2%) and with a mean age of 36.6 years (range 16 to 59 years old). In addition, it was not mentioned in the study whether this population had combined exposure to noise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>]. This did not corroborate the findings of the present study, considering that among participants who presented vestibular dysfunction, the deficitary type was more evident (27.4%).</p><p>The present study showed no significant relationship between exposure to pesticides and noise and the occurrence of altered vestibular examinations.</p><p>Regarding auditory and vestibular complaints, 30.3% of the participants in the present study presented tinnitus and dizziness and 33.3% complained of hypoacusis. Tinnitus complaint was observed in other studies with populations exposed to pesticides and noise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref33">33</xref>].</p><p>A study revealed 57% of participants to have tinnitus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref33">33</xref>]. One study showed a similar occurrence of tinnitus (52.08%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref17">17</xref>]. Another study found that 28.05% of workers simultaneously exposed to pesticides and noise complained of tinnitus, increasing this incidence among workers who presented alterations in the audiometry (60.87%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref19">19</xref>]. The occurrence of tinnitus in another study reported an incidence of 46% among agricultural workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>Studies have shown that dizziness complaint is a recurrent clinical symptom in populations exposed to pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>Dizziness is characterized by a sensation of alteration in body balance, either rotatory (vertigo) or non-rotatory (body instability), and it appears when there is interference in the normal functioning of the body balance system, which may be of peripheral or central origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref35">35</xref>].</p><p>Authors have reported that long-term exposure to pesticides may affect the central processing of sensory information for body balance as well as the sensory and somatosensory/vestibular systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>In the present study, no statistically significant relationship was observed between the dizziness complaint and the vestibular exams (p = 0.5366). The dizziness complaint presented by the study participants could not be attributed to the altered vestibular exams. However, it is undisputed that exposure to chemical agents may affect the postural balance of exposed populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref36">36</xref>], and that the age factor may contribute to the increase in dizziness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref38">38</xref>].</p><p>A statistically significant difference was noted between the auditory pure tone thresholds of the right ear obtained at 4000 Hz and the results of the altered vestibular exams. This finding may be justified by the anterior and posterior labyrinth intertwined from an anatomo-physiological stand-point, consistent with Cochlear-Vestibular Syndrome. This known fact in the literature justifies the importance of researching the integrity of the auditory system through the auditory exams along with the vestibular exams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref39">39</xref>].</p><p>In a study, hearing normality was verified by conventional audiological evaluation, among 61.14% of 18 rural workers exposed to organophosphate insecticides. While 38.8% presented hearing alterations, 22.22% of the workers presented hearing loss at the frequencies of 6000 and 8000 Hz, and 16.67% presented sensorineural hearing loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107288-ref15">15</xref>].</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Study Limitations</title><p>This study presents with typical limitations of a cross-sectional study. It is not possible to conclude a causal relationship, but only the risk of the professional category for vestibular dysfunction. The EDCA, exposed to pesticides and noise, may have other inherent variables, such as age and chronic diseases, that may make them more susceptible to vestibular dysfunction.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Study Results’ Recommendations from This Study</title><p>The present study showed vestibular changes in EDCA. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible effects of pesticides and noise on the vestibular system in exposed populations, as there is a lack of studies addressing this problem. Future studies should consider a longitudinal (case/control) design to better characterize the association between pesticide exposure and noise, especially in younger workers. The correlation of vestibular examinations with biological markers is also necessary in order to verify biochemical, immunological, and hematological parameters.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The occurrence of vestibular dysfunction was observed in more than 1/3 of the studied population and related to anterior and posterior labyrinth alteration (Cochlear-Vestibular Syndrome). There was no sign of central vestibular alteration in any of the participants. The most common peripheral alteration was of the deficit type, revealing the chronicity of the condition.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>de Souza Alcar&#225;s, P.A., Zeigelboim, B.S., Corazza, M.C.A., L&#252;ders, D., Marques, J.M. and de Lacerda, A.B.M. (2021) Vestibular Function Evaluation in Endemic Diseases Combat Agents. Health, 13, 144-156. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2021.132013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.107288-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carneiro, F.F., Rigotto, R.M., Augusto, L.G.S., Friedrich, K. and Búrigo, A.C. (Orgs) (2015) Dossiê ABRASCO: Um alerta sobre os impactos dos agrotóxicos na saúde. Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venancio, Expressao Popular, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torres, R. (2009) Agente de combate a endemias. Revista Poli-Saúde, Educacao e Trabalho, 3, 16-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, E.P., Lopes, S.M.B., Amorin, M.I.M., Araújo, L.H.S., Neves, K.T. and Maia, E.R. (2009) Pesticide Exposure and Its Repercussion in the Health of Sanitary Agents in the State of Ceará, Brazil. Ciência &amp; Saúde Coletiva, 14, 2221-2230. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232009000600031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2018) OSHA News Releases 2018.  
https://www.osha.gov/news/newsreleases/infodate-y/2018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morata, T.C. and Little, M.B. (2002) Suggested Guidelines for Studying the Combined Effects of Occupational Exposure to Noise and Chemicals on Hearing. Noise &amp; Health, 4, 73-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buchanan, L.H. (2002) Auditory Effects of Occupational/Environmental Lead Exposure. In: Best Practices Workshop: Combined Effects of Chemicals and Noise on Hearing, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the National Hearing Conservation Association, Cincinnati, 21-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, A.C. and Morata, T.C. (2010) Occupational Exposure to Chemicals and Hearing Impairment. In: Torén, K., Eds., Arbet och Halsa, Vol. 44, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campo, P., Morata, T.C. and Hong, O. (2013) Chemical Exposure and Hearing Loss. Disease-a-Month, 59, 119-138.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2013.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Morata, T.C. and Lacerda, A.B.M. (2013) Saúde auditiva. In: Zeigelboim, B.S. and Jurkiewicz, A.L., Eds., Multidisciplinaridade na Otoneurologia, Roca, Sao Paulo, 386-399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SESA/PR (2013) Protocolo de avaliacao das intoxicacoes cronicas por agrotóxicos, Superintendência de Vigilancia em Saúde, Curitiba.  
http://www.abrasco.org.br/UserFiles/Image/PDF%20protocolo%20avaliacao%20intoxicacao%20agrotoxico.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alcarás, P.A.S., Lacerda, A.B.M. and Marques, J.M. (2013) Estudo das emissoes otoacústicas evocadas e efeito de supressao em trabalhadores expostos a agrotóxicos e ruído. CoDAS, 25, 527-533.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lacerda, A.B.M., Lobato, D. and Alcarás, P.A.S. (2019) Avaliacao audiológica para trabalhadores expostos a agentes químicos com ênfase nos pesticidas. In: Lopes, A.C., Goncalves, C.G.O. and Andrade, W.T., Eds., Fonoaudiologia e saúde auditiva do trabalhador, Book Toy, Ribeirao Preto, 133-157.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira Júnior, A.R., Torres, A.R.A. and Silva, C.M.A. (2015) Condicoes laborais dos agentes de combate a endemias e seus efeitos à saúde. Essencial Sobral, 16, 77-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Delgado, I.F. and Paumgartten, F.J.R. (2004) Intoxicacao e uso de pesticidas por agricultores do Município de Paty do Alferes, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 20, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2004000100034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoshino, A.C.H., Pacheco-Ferreira, H., Taguchi, C.K., Tomita, S. and Miranda, M.F. (2008) Ototoxicity Study in Workers Exposed to Organophosphate. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 74, 912-918.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000600015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korbes, D., Silveira, A.F., Hyppolito, M.A. and Munaro, G. (2010) Alteracoes no sistema vestibulococlear decorrentes da exposicao ao agrotóxico: Uma revisao de literatura. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 15, 146-152. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342010000100024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guida, H.L., Morini, R.G. and Cardoso, A.C. (2010) Audiological Evaluation in Workers Exposed to Noise and Pesticide. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76, 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayasingue, S.S. and Pathirana, K.D. (2011) Effect of Deliberate Ingestion of Organophosphate or Paraquat on Brain Stem Auditory-Evoked Potential. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 7, 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0173-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Delecrode, C.R., Freitas, T.D., Frizzo, A.C.F. and Cardoso, A.C.V. (2012) Prevalence of Tinnitus in Workers Exposed to Noise and Organophosphate. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyl, 16, 328-334. 
https://doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772012000300005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kós, M.I., Hoshino, A.C., Asmus, C.I.F., Mendonca, R. and Meyer, A. (2013) Efeitos da exposiao a agrotóxicos sobre o sistema auditivo periférico e central: Uma revisao sistemática. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 29, 1491-1506. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013001200003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gatto, M.P., Fioretti, M., Fabrizi, G., Gherardi, M., Strafella, E. and Santarelli, L. (2014) Effects of Potential Neurotoxic Pesticides on Hearing Loss: A Review. NeuroToxicology, 42, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.03.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Judai, M.A. (2015) Estudo dos limiares auditivos em frequências convencionais e altas frequências de moradores e trabalhadores expostos a praguicidas na regiao do Pontal do Paranapanema. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lobato, D.C.B. (2015) Disfuncao auditiva induzida por agrotóxicos em trabalhadores agrícolas do Paraná. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tomiazzi, J.S. (2017) Avaliacao auditiva e citogenética de trabalhadores rurais do Pontal do Paranapanema—SP expostos a agroquímicos e tabagismo, isolado ou combinado. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sena, T.R.R., Dourado, S.S.F., Lima, L.V. and Antoniolli, A.R. (2018) The Hearing of Rural Workers Exposed to Noise and Pesticides. Noise Health, 20, 23-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dick, R.B., Steenland, K., Krieg Jr., E.F. and Hines, C.J. (2001) Evaluation of Acute Sensory-Motor Effetcs and Test Sensitivity Using Termiticide Workers Exposed to Chlorpyrifos. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 23, 381-393. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-0362(01)00143-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cogo, L.A., Murashima, A.A.B., Santos Filha, V.A.V., Hyppolito, M.A. and Silveira, A.F. (2014) Avaliacao funcional do sistema vestibular de cobaias intoxicadas por meio da prova calórica. Revista CEFAC, 16, 1434-1442. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620149313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cogo, L.A., Santos Filha, V.A.V., Murashima, A.A.B., Hyppolito, M.A. and Silveira, A.F. (2016) Morphological Analysis of the Vestibular System of Guinea Pigs Poisoned by Organophosphate. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 82, 11-16. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Mangabeira-Albernaz, P.L., Gananca, M.M. and Pontes, P.A.L. (1976) Operational Model of the Vestibular Apparatus. In: Mangabeira-Albernaz, P.L. and Gananca, M.M. Ed., Vertigem, Moderna, Sao Paulo, 29-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, K.C.F., Silva, S.M.R. and Gananca, C.F. (2005) Study of Oculomotor and Vestibular Tests Using Digital Vectonystagmography. Disturb. Comun, 17, 315-322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palatas, O.H.G., Gananca, C.F. and Gananca, F.F. (2009) Quality of Life of Individuals Submitted to Vestibular Rehabilitation. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 75, 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942009000300014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arlien-Soborg, P., Zilstorff, K., Grandjean, B. and Pedersen, L.M. (1981) Vestibular Dysfunction in Occupational Chronic Solvent Intoxication. Clinical Otolaryngology &amp; Allied Sciences, 6, 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1981.tb01549.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manjabosco, C.W., Morata, T.C. and Marques, J.M. (2004) Perfil Audiométrico de trabalhadores agrícolas. Arquivos Internacionais de Otorrinolaringologia, 8, 285-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sunwook, K., Nussbaum, M.A., Quandt, S.A., Laurienti, P.J. and Arcury, T.A. (2016) Effects of Lifetime Occupational Pesticide Exposure on Postural Control among Farmworkers and Non-Farmworkers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zanardini, F.H., Zeigelboim, B.S., Jurkiewics, A.L., Marques, J.M. and Martins-Bassetto, J. (2007) Reabilitacao vestibular em idosos com tontura. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualizacao Científica, 19, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872007000200006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamel, F., Rowland, A.S., Park, L.P., Anger, W.K., Baird, D.D., Gladen, B.C., Moreno, T., Stallone, L. and Sandler, D.P. (2003) Neurobehavioral Performance and Work Experience in Florida Farmworkers. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 1765-1772. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tavares, F.S., Santos, M.F.C. and Knobel, K.A.B. (2008) Reabilitacao vestibular em um hospital universitário. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 74, 241-247. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000200014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeigelboim, B.S., Klagenberg, K.F., Rosa, M.R.D., Paulin, F., Jurkiewicz, A.L. and Marques, J.M. (2008) Achados vestibulares na populacao idosa. Fisioterapia em Movimento, 21, 89-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107288-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lourenco, E.A., Lopes, K.C., Pontes-JR, A., Oliveira, M.H., Umemura, A. and Vargas, A.L. (2005) Distribution of Neurotological Findings in Patients with Cochleovestibular Dysfunction. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 71, 288-296.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31325-2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>