<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJRM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Regenerative Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-2513</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojrm.2021.101001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJRM-107173</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Two-Year Heart Failure Study with Allogeneic Myoblast Transplantation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wenbin</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Keqiang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qizhong</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ping</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B.</surname><given-names>S. Dawei Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baoquan</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hengtian</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fei</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hongzhe</surname><given-names>Fan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>Guo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liping</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jie</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yangyang</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yingjie</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Danlin</surname><given-names>M. Law</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>K. Law</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Third Hospital Affiliated to Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Cardiac Surgery Center, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical Univer-sity, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Cell Therapy Institute, Wuhan, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>02</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Objectives:</b> Allogeneic myoblast transplantation (AMT), cyclosporine immunosuppression and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were used to treat end-stage heart failure (HF) subjects without hope of obtaining a heart transplant. 
  <b>Background:</b> Severe myocardial infarction conveys serious complications such as ventricular aneurysm, wall thinning and rupture with fatal consequences. 
  <b>Methods: </b>After meeting Inclusion/Exclusion criteria and signing Patient Informed Consents, 10 HF subjects having mean thinnest wall thickness of 2.21 &#177; 0.55 mm and ventricular aneurysms were admitted under intensive care. Each subject took daily cyclosporine for three weeks. On the third day of cyclosporine administration, approximately 1 billion myoblasts were implanted 
  through 20 injections into the infarcted myocardium following CABG. <b>Results: </b><u>Safety</u> No subject suffered death, viral infection, malignant arrhythmia, reduction in cardiac output, immune rejection, or aneurysm growth. No significant difference was found before versus after treatment in the mean levels of blood routine, liver and kidney enzymes, electrolytes and fibrinogen. <u>Efficacy</u> Emission computed tomography (ECT) and magnetic resonance (MR) demonstrated significant increases in viability and perfusion. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased (P &lt; 0.05) by 20.1% and 19.3% at 6 months and at 2 years postoperatively. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved by 2 grades, including 6-minute walk test (6 MWT) distance increase, and reductions in the number of episodes of angina pectoris, chest tightness, shortness of breath after exercise, and nighttime sit-up breathing. <b>Conclusions: </b>For the first time, AMT in adjunct use with CABG and cyclosporine demonstrated that cell survived and engrafted in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy; in this small study the cell transplant was safe. The improvement in heart function and quality of life could be secondary to combined effect of bypass and cell transplant. A larger randomized clinical trial is required to confirm the efficacy. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Heart Failure</kwd><kwd> Allogeneic Myoblast Transplantation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Heart muscle degeneration is a leading cause of debilitation and death in humans. Its primary cause is partial or complete obliteration of the coronary artery, often precipitating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Long-term ischemia leads to ventricular cell death and myocardial necrosis. Although medication, trans-myocardial revascularization (TMR), and CABG can increase local blood supply and reduce short-term mortality and morbidity, most patients continue suffering decreased ventricular function and chronic heart failure.</p><p>Severe myocardial infarction conveys serious complications such as ventricular aneurysm, wall thinning and rupture with fatal consequences. Traditional aneurysm resection improves heart contractility by restoring the original oval structure of the left ventricle. This procedure is reserved only for patients with at least medium-sized ventricles because of volume consideration. Prognosis for these severe heart failure patients is three to six months of life despite CABG. Heart transplantation has been the gold standard for patients with end-stage heart failure, but donor heart non-availability and lifelong immunosuppression dictate its limited usage. It is urgent to explore new therapeutic measures to increase the quality of life and lifespan of these patients.</p><p>Chronic ischemia after AMI causes loss of cardiomyocytes, contractile filaments and ventricular contractility. Regeneration attempt by surviving cardiomyocytes consists of undergoing at most four mitotic divisions because the telomeric DNA repeats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref1">1</xref>] in these terminally differentiated cells are minimal. Such attempt cannot regenerate enough cardiomyocytes to produce the necessary quantity of contractile filaments such as myosin, actin, troponin and tropomyosin to sustain normal heart contractility. The degenerative heart also transmits biochemical signals to recruit stem cells from the stroma and from the bone marrow to repair the muscle damage. Due to the significant increase in fibroblast growth factor release after infarction, much of the recruited stem cells differentiate to become fibroblasts instead of cardiomyocytes, forming scars and not contractile filaments.</p><p>The damaged myocardium needs replenishment of live, genetically normal, myogenic cells to deposit contractile filaments to regain heart function, preferably before fibroblast infiltration. This is when AMT has an advantage over all other cell types [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>]. Considering dystrophic and diabetic cardiomyopathies as hereditary, and ischemic cardiomyopathy as genetically predisposed, AMT was designed to genetically repair hereditary degenerative cells and to replenish degenerated cells with live ones. In 1990, AMT was, and still is, the world’s first human gene therapy and the world’s first somatic cell therapy in the treatment of human muscle genetic disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Myoblasts are differentiated cells destined to become muscles. Unlike cardiomyocytes, myoblasts possess long telomere DNA subunits and can undergo 50 mitotic divisions without loss of myogenic capacity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] or developing into tumor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref5">5</xref>]. The transition from animal experimentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref7">7</xref>] into cardiac clinical trials was largely based on previous demonstration of significant safety and efficacy in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in FDA approved Phase II and Phase III clinical trials using allogeneic myoblast allografts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Law et al. reported in the year 2000 the pioneering study of implanting human myoblasts into the porcine hearts with endovascular catheter of the NOGA system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref11">11</xref>]. The mechanisms by which allogeneic human myoblasts survived, developed and functioned with the use of cyclosporine immunosuppression were examined through open chest endomyocardial injections of cultured skeletal myoblasts into infarcted porcine myocardium. Three mechanisms were elucidated as proof-of-concept using genetic markers to label the nuclei of the donor myoblasts. Under the influence of hormones and slow contractile activity of the heart, donor myoblasts fused among themselves to form new cardiomyocytes, depositing contractile filaments to improve heart contractility. Others fused with the host cardiomyocytes through natural cell fusion, spontaneously transferring their nuclei into host cardiomyocytes to impart myogenic regeneration. Still others fused to form myotubes that eventually developed into immature skeletal myofibers containing satellite cells. New production of contractile filaments augmented heart contractility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>In 2004, Law et al. reported the world’s first two cases of allogeneic myoblast transplantation for myocardial infarction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>]. Results demonstrated that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), viability, motility, myocardial perfusion, and ventricular wall thickness were significantly improved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>]. The end-diastolic and end-systolic blood volumes were increased without significant arrhythmia. At 12 months after implantation, LVEF was increased by about 40%, and perfusion capacity increased by 38% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>]. More than 300 cases of autologous myoblast transplantation internationally have shown that it was safe and efficacious in treating ischemic cardiomyopathies and heart failure. Approximately 200 cases were injected after thoracotomy and 100 cases were injected with endovascular catheters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>]. Further advance with myoblast clinical trials has been distracted for 17 years by Piero Anversa’s misconduct in cardiac stem cell research in Harvard University until 10/14/2018.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Regulatory</title><p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College to obtain preliminary safety and efficacy information to justify future clinical trials of AMT. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry numbered ChiCTR2000039590. All subjects signed Informed Consents for the trial.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Case Selection</title><p>A total of 10 heart failure subjects suffering severe myocardial infarction with ventricular aneurysm in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College from February 2016 to March 2018 were selected. Subject profiles are shown in TableS1. Tables S1-S8 are placed in Supplementary Appendix.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Research Methods</title><p>Clinical evaluation was performed using a self-contrast method.</p><p>All patients were given CABG and conventional medication for symptomatic control of blood pressure, blood lipid, blood glucose, anticoagulation, coronary expansion, cardiac strengthening, and diuretics. Traditional aneurysm resection was not used in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Manufacture of Allogeneic Human Myoblasts</title><p>Donors: Upon approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Cell Therapy Institute and the signing of the Donor Informed Consents, muscle donors were admitted after meeting the Inclusion and Exclusion criteria. They were male volunteers between the ages of 16 and 36. They were certified by a physician as being in good health, having normal levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LD) and tested negative for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), syphilis (RPR), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). They also received the following tests: Chem 24, CBC, and physical examination with normal results. Donors were excluded if they had any chronic or infectious diseases, and if were allergic to the local anesthetic Lidocaine.</p><p>Muscle Biopsy: About 2 grams of muscle were removed from the quadriceps muscle using an open biopsy technique under local anesthetic (Lidocaine patch) in a sterile field of a surgical suite of a hospital. The donor site was sutured and bandaged. No prophylactic antibiotic was used. The donor was discharged after recovery from the surgical procedure to be followed by his physician if infection occurred.</p><p>Preparation of Myoblasts: Biopsy specimen obtained was processed immediately using sterile techniques meeting CFDA approved GMP standards. Myoblasts were cultured in growth medium and incubated at 37˚C and in 7% CO<sub>2</sub> as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref14">14</xref>]. Myoblasts were frozen at different stages so the time allotted for culturing could be coordinated with a scheduled transplant. The number of frozen cells and the number of samples were documented. One test vial was reserved in liquid nitrogen for each biopsy. Random samples of the myoblasts were tested for their abilitytodivide, fuse, and formmyotubes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref13">13</xref>]. Lotreleasetesting consisted of sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and testing for myoblast identity, purity, potency, viability, and cell count on a pooled sample prior to transplant meeting quality control standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref15">15</xref>]. A retain sample of myoblasts was reserved from each transplant.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Immunosuppression</title><p>Each subject took daily oral doses of 5 mg/kg body weight of cyclosporine for three weeks with weaning using half doses after the second week to suppress rejection of the allografts. Since myoblast fusion completed within one week after transplantation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref16">16</xref>], and since myotubes and mature myofibers did not express major histocompatibility complex class 1 (MHC-1) surface antigens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref8">8</xref>] it was not necessary to administer lifelong immunosuppression as in heart transplants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref10">10</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Myoblast Transplantation</title><p>Following distal anastomosis of the coronary artery bypass surgery, transplantation of myoblasts was performed on the third day of cyclosporine administration. Approximately 1 billion myoblasts (at 108 cells /mL) were injected with 20 injections placed 1 cm apart along the inside border of the infarction. For each injection, about 50 million myoblasts were carefully deposited in a centripetal diagonal track (&lt;5 mm) as the needle was slowly withdrawn out of the inner border of the infracted myocardium.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Safety Indicators</title><p>Blood routine (including white blood cell count, neutrophil fraction, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count), liver and kidney functions (including albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, glutamate aminotransferase, urea nitrogen, creatinine), electrolytes, bleeding and clotting times were determined before, and at 6 months and at 2 years after AMT.</p><p>Intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions including virus infection, malignant arrhythmia, and death events were carefully monitored.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Efficacy Indicators</title><p>The clinical symptoms, vital signs, imaging examination and blood laboratory examination results of the patients before and after the operation were compared, and the adverse reactions during and after the operation were observed.</p>Observation Methods<p>1) Subjective symptoms (such as chest tightness, shortness of breath, number of angina pectoris, sit-up breathing at night, urine output, appetite, 6-minute walk test) before and after the operation were continuously observed.</p><p>2) Postoperative ECG monitoring</p><p>After treatment, all subjects underwent multifunctional 48-hour-holter monitoring to determine if there were changes in ECG and vital signs. An electrocardiogram was performed again at 6 months and at 2 years postoperatively to observe if there was occurrence of arrhythmia.</p><p>3) Echocardiography and cardiac ECT</p><p>Patients underwent Echo and ECT examinations before, at 6 months and at 2 years postoperatively to determine the LVEF, cardiac output (CO), and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVDd).</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS19.0 software. P &lt; 0.05 indicated significant statistical differences.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data and analyses and the reporting of adverse events and for the fidelity of the study to the protocol.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Safety Assessment</title>Adverse Reaction Assessment<p>All ten subjects successfully underwent treatment without malignant arrhythmia, chills, fever, allergic reactions, vomiting, viral infection or other adverse reactions.</p><p>Throughout the course of the entire study, two subjects exhibited early post-operative occasional ventricular premature beats. Another two subjects demonstrated atrial premature beats. Considered related to electrolyte disorders and myocardial damage of the primary disease, they were converted to sinus after symptomatic treatment. No malignant arrhythmia and no deaths occurred, and there was no virus infection after treatment.</p><p>There were no statistically significant differences between the means (&#177;SD) in the leukocyte count, neutrophil count, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count before versus at 6 months, and at 2 years after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS2 in Supplementary Appendix).</p><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the mean levels (&#177;SD) of total bilirubin, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate amino transferase before versus at 6 months, and at 2 years after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS3 in Supplementary Appendix).</p><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the mean levels (&#177;SD) of serum creatinine or urea nitrogen before versus at 6 months, and at 2 years after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS4) in Supplementary Appendix).</p><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the mean levels (&#177;SD) of serum K<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> before treatment versus at 6 months and at 2 years after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS5 in Supplementary Appendix).</p><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the mean levels (&#177;SD) of prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and partial prothrombin time before versus after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS6 in Supplementary Appendix).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Efficacy Assessment</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Objective Evaluation</title><p>Cardiac ECT demonstrated significant improvement in myocardial perfusion and in viability of ventricular myocardium at 6 months and at 2 years after surgery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The mean LVEFs were increased by 20.1% at 6 months after treatment, and by 19.3% at 2 years after treatment as compared to the control mean before treatment. These mean increases were of statistical significance at P &lt; 0.05 (TableS7, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A)).</p><p>There was no significant difference (TableS7 in Supplementary Appendix) in the mean levels (&#177;SD) of LVDd (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(B)) and CO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(C)) before versus after treatment (P &gt; 0.05). Although the mean difference in CO before versus after treatment was of statistical insignificance, the postoperative means were all higher than before treatment. Consistently, the mean postoperative lengths of LVDd were lower than that before treatment.</p><p>MR imaging showed no significant difference in the mean levels (&#177;SD) of ventricular aneurysm area and wall thickness before versus after treatment (P &gt; 0.05) (TableS8 in Supplementary Appendix) though individual variations did demonstrate significant increases in wall thickness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Subjective Evaluation</title><p>Postoperative clinical improvement included significantly fewer episodes of</p><p>angina pectoris, chest tightness and shortness of breath after activity, nighttime sit-up breathing, and increase in appetite and urine output. The 6MWT distance increased steadily.</p><p>The results depicted essentially derived from allogeneic myoblast culture and transplantation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), in addition to CABG and cyclosporine immunosuppression.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>For the first time, AMT in adjunct use with CABG and cyclosporine, was demonstrated to be safe and efficacious in sustaining the lifespan of end-stage heart failure patients, who suffered myocardial infarction with ventricular aneurysm, for up to 2 years, with significant improvement in LVEF (TableS7, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A)), NYHA cardiac function (Central Illustration 1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and quality of life. It was the original design to define a treatment modality that could 100% sustain the survival of the severe heart failure patients having no more than 6-months of life expectance, and such design was demonstrated to be successful. The statistically significant increases in the mean LVEF by 20.1% at 6 months after treatment, and by 19.3% at 2 years after treatment compared</p><p>favorably to those reported by all other studies using autologous myoblasts 17 - 33. As the trend of improvement indicated, statistically significant difference in LVDd and CO before versus after treatment would have become apparent if more subjects were enrolled.</p><p>The ultimate demonstration of AMT efficacy by itself should be from randomized, double-blinded studies involving more subjects of dystrophic cardiomyopathies, diabetic cardiomyopathy, or dilated cardiomyopathies that would not necessitate CABG.</p><p>This study showed that white blood cell count, neutrophil count, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total red blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, total protein, renal function, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, and partial prothrombin time before versus after treatment of myoblasts were not different (P &gt; 0.05). On repeated follow-ups after the operation, there were no deaths, malignant arrhythmias, or viral infections. The results demonstrated that allogeneic myoblast transplantation had no significant impact on various important indicators of the human body, and there was no serious adverse reaction. Although occasional ventricular premature beats occurred in four subjects after CABG, all symptomatic treatments were traced to the sinus and were related to electrolyte disturbance, myocardial damage and the primary disease. None of the subjects experienced malignant arrhythmia or ventricular tachycardia.</p><p>AMT represented the earliest human cell therapy for heart disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref11">11</xref>]. Without significant knowledge of myoblast manufacture, quality control and cell transplant techniques, many clinicians rushed into clinical studies. Menasche, et al. first reported feasibility and safety data on ischemic heart failure patients, implanting 650 million to one billion autologous impure myoblast cells with overly large number of injections into the infarctions during CABG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref18">18</xref>]. Follow-up studies showed that patients had significantly improved left ventricular function and NYHA function level, decreased ventricular remodeling, and increased myocardial tolerance confirmed by histology. However, 4 patients had delayed episodes of sustained left ventricular tachycardia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref18">18</xref>]. During this period, similar reports continued to appear around the world with mixed results.</p><p>In most of the reports, myoblast purity was determined using CD56+, an antibody that reacts with fibroblasts, neurons, and myoblasts indiscriminately. A common pitfall of myoblast culture is fibroblast contamination. Since myoblast doubling time is about 21 hours and fibroblast doubling time is about 15 hours, fibroblast growth often overtakes the myoblast culture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref14">14</xref>]. Without published documentation of quality controls, authors of these studies were implanting very impure myoblasts. Fibroblasts produce scars but not contractile filaments. These scars created numerous barriers to electric coupling and rhythmic synchronization of ventricular contraction. This pitfall, together with the physical trauma induced by overly large number of injections, were largely responsible for the malignant arrhythmia and tachycardia reported in some early patients, not to mention the gross GMP non-compliance in quality control of myoblast identity, viability, purity, quantity, potency, no mycoplasma, no endotoxins and no bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref33">33</xref>]. The latter explained cell death of up to 90% that affected the safety and efficacy of myoblast transplantation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref34">34</xref>]. Clinical studies confirmed that CABG with transplantation of impure and non-viable myoblasts produced ventricular tachycardia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref26">26</xref>]. The intercalated disc, the basic unit for the transmission and synchronization of electrical activity and mechanical function between adjacent cardiac fibers were not found, and its absence constituted a risk of malignant arrhythmia after transplantation with substandard myoblasts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref35">35</xref>]. Therefore, the safety and efficacy of myoblast transplantation depend largely on high quality control of myoblast production and the technique of implantation.</p><p>Heartbeat is myogenic in origin and is initiated by pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. As depolarization sweeps through the atrioventricular node, the depolarization excites the Purkinje fibers of the bundle of His, which, in turn, signals the ventricles to contract rhythmically. Heart function would be impaired if the rhythmic action potentials do not synchronize the fiber contractions. In the regenerative heart with AMT, excitation of the newly formed and heterokaryotic cardiomyocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>] remained unchanged because there was little change in gap junctions for current flow. However, where new skeletal myofiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>] were formed, presumably at the inner border of the infarction, such heterogenicity might create aberrant electric activities such as arrhythmia, especially when earlier studies reported absence of gap junction protein connexin 43, a marker protein responsible for electrical coupling between cardiomyocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref36">36</xref>].</p><p>Conceptually, myoblast transplantation should not cause arrhythmia if the well-researched standard operation procedures were followed. The thresholds of excitation for cardiac and skeletal myofibers are similar, i.e. between +40 mV to +50 mV depolarization. Whereas the cardiomyocyte action potential is triggered with an increase in Ca<sup>2+</sup> conductance into the cell, the skeletal myofiber action potential is triggered with an increase of Na<sup>+</sup> conductance. As Ca<sup>2+</sup> has a greater ionic size than Na<sup>+</sup> and thus lower ionic mobility, the action potential of cardiomyocytes has a longer duration (~250 ms) than that of skeletal myofiber (~1.5 ms). This duration difference is advantageous because the same myocardial depolarization can simultaneously and synchronously stimulate the cardiac and skeletal myofibers through direct excitation contraction coupling. Since the action potentials of skeletal myofibers are of short duration, they will merge into the longer compound action potential of the heart. The skeletal myofibers will cease to fire and stop contracting once Cl<sup>−</sup> efflux hyperpolarization of the myocardium reaches approximately +40 mV. Since 90% of the transplanted myoblasts developed to become cardiomyocytes or heterokaryotic cardiomyocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>], and only a small amount of skeletal myofibers were formed, the electrophysiologic treatise explains why none of the subjects in the current study experienced malignant arrhythmia from the myoblast transplantation.</p><p>Abraham et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref37">37</xref>] demonstrated in vitro that connexin 43 was expressed when exogenous connexin 43 gene was transferred into myoblasts. Electrophysiological studies had also found that there was a synchronized instantaneous calcium current between skeletal muscle myotubes and adjacent cardiomyocytes, further confirming that after transplantation, cardiomyocytes, heterokaryotic cardiomyocytes and skeletal myotubes were simultaneously activated through the same excitation-contraction coupling. Simultaneous contraction could not only promote the formation of gap junctions, but also effectively reduced the incidence of arrhythmia. In addition, a sodium ionic current was detected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref38">38</xref>], confirming that some myoblasts developed to become myotubes and immature myofiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref12">12</xref>]. Skeletal myofibers are known to adapt to the frequency of electric excitation to which they are subjected. Under the influence of hormones and slow contractile activity of the heart, these immature skeletal myofibers developed characteristics of cardiomyocytes.</p><p>The regenerative heart with myoblasts was endowed with a greater number of myogenic cells capable of mitosis and was prepared to regenerate upon injury. These cells produced more contractile filaments to augment heart contractility. The latter is fundamental to the quality of life and the lifespan of patients suffering various forms of cardiovascular diseases. Being pluripotent, embryonic or adult stem cells exhibit uncontrolled differentiation into various lineages to produce bone, cartilage, fat, connective tissue, skeletal and heart muscles. Until scientists can accurately define the specific transcriptional factors and pathways to guide stem cell differentiation into adequate quantity of cardiomyocytes, the use of stem cell injection into the human heart would have a risk-benefit ratio much higher than the use of myoblasts.</p><p>Myoblasts are differentiated cells destined to become muscles. Further studies are necessary to better define the efficacy of myoblast transplantation itself, preferably through transplanting male donor myoblasts into female subjects, and using the Y-chromosome to track the development of implanted allogeneic myoblasts in the host. Position papers in 2017 highlighted numerous developing cell therapies for severe heart failure with neither governmental approval nor endorsement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.107173-ref40">40</xref>]. Heart transplant has remained the generally accepted treatment for end-stage patients. With an estimate of over 50 million heart failure patients worldwide, only a few thousand donor hearts were available for transplants last year. Patients who survive heart transplants need to be immunosuppressed for life with not only compromised quality of life but also constant life-threat of COVID-19.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study demonstrated survival and engraftment of allogeneic myoblasts in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The improvement of heart function and the quality of life of patients was the result of a combination of CABG and cell therapy. A large randomized clinical trial will be required to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of AMT.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Perspectives</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Competency in Medical Knowledge</title><p>AMT, cyclosporine immunosuppression and CABG were used to treat end-stage HF subjects without hope of obtaining a heart transplant.</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Competency in Patient Care</title><p>AMT is much less invasive than a heart transplant. The regenerative heart with myoblast allograft is the patient’s very own and requires only 3 weeks of immunosuppression.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3"><title>6.3. Translational Outlook</title><p>At a small fraction of the cost of a heart transplant, the regenerative heart with allogeneic myoblasts promises lower healthcare spending if proven safe and efficacious.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the Cell Therapy Institute for free supplies of human myoblasts.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Funding</title><p>This work was supported by the National Distinguished Expert Award of China and the Cell Therapy Institute Endowment Fund awarded to Prof. Peter K. Law, and by the Discipline Construction Fund of Xinxiang Medical College awarded to Prof. Wenbin Li.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Authors’ Contribution</title><p>Prof. Li, Prof. Law and Dr. Wang contributed equally and are co-first authors. W.L., H.Q., F.W. performed surgery; H.G., B.Z. provided postoperative intensive care; K.W., L.L., F.L. collected data and conducted statistical analyses; Q.S. provided patient coordination; H.F. conducted extracorporeal circulation, J.L., Y.L., Y.Y. conducted postoperative follow-up; P.L. supervised myoblast manufacture; D.C. provided myoblast quality control; D.M.L provided project coordination; P.K.L. designed project and analyzed data, provided free licenses and myoblasts, and wrote manuscript with K.W.</p><p>All authors read and approved the final manuscript and declared no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Li, W., Wang, K., Shi, Q., Lu, P., Chen, B.S.D., Zhang, B., Qi, H., Wang, F., Fan, H., Guo, H., Lu, L., Lu, F., Liu, J., Li, Y., Yang, Y., Law, D.M. and Law, P.K. (2021) Two-Year Heart Failure Study with Allogeneic Myoblast Transplantation. Open Journal of Regenerative Medicine, 10, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrm.2021.101001</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Supplementary Appendix</title><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> General information of subjects</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Combined disease</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infarct area</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal movement (Y/N)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bypass vessels</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of cerebral hemorrhage, hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior and interval wall</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX, D1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cui</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Membranous nephropathy, diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior, interval and rear wall.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ren</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Song</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension, diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior, interval and inferior wall.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX, D1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Che</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX, LCA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Du</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension, diabetes, history of cerebral hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior wall near apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LAD, LCX</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S2</label><caption><title> Blood cell test results before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leukocyte count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59 &#177; 3.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.29 &#177; 2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18 &#177; 1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.808</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutrophil count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25 &#177; 0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.934</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemoglobin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147 &#177; 9.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.8 &#177; 9.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.8 &#177; 9.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.635</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red-cell count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41 &#177; 0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Platelet count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213.4 &#177; 48.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245.60 &#177; 52.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.10 &#177; 40.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.312</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S3</label><caption><title> Liver function indexes before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total bilirubin (μmol/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.02 &#177; 10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.31 &#177; 10.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.46 &#177; 5.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.491</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Albumin (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.98 &#177; 4.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.76 &#177; 3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.25 &#177; 2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.138</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.80 &#177; 34.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80 &#177; 18.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.20 &#177; 5.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.166</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspartate amino transferase (U/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25 &#177; 7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5 &#177; 7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.13 &#177; 7.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.161</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S4</label><caption><title> Renal function indexes before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serum creatinine (μmol/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.90 &#177; 16.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.40 &#177; 81.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.80 &#177; 14.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urea nitrogen (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11 &#177; 1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.78 &#177; 0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03 &#177; 1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S5</label><caption><title> Electrolyte levels before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 &#177; 0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.831</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.6 &#177; 2.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.1 &#177; 3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.1 &#177; 2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.456</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.30 &#177; 2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.3 &#177; 3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.9 &#177; 5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.680</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S6</label><caption><title> Blood coagulation indexes before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prothrombin time (s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.18 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.30 &#177; 0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.951</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibrinogen (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.13 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.341</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Activated partial thromboplastin time (s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.55 &#177; 1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.94 &#177; 0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.63 &#177; 1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.169</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S7</label><caption><title> Cardiac function before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LVEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3 &#177; 8.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2 &#177; 5.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.9 &#177; 5.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LVDd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.3 &#177; 9.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.3 &#177; 8.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.8 &#177; 7.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.381</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.18 &#177; 1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02 &#177; 1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.07 &#177; 0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.351</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S8</label><caption><title> Ventricular aneurysm area and thinnest wall thickness before versus after treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 mo-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 yr-post</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area, mm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >460.1 &#177; 143.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >394 &#177; 150.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >422.7 &#177; 426.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.864</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness, mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32 &#177; 0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49 &#177; 0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.565</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Central Illustration 1</title><p>NYHA grading before versus after treatment.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.107173-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishikawa, F., Matunis, M.J., Dreyfuss, G. and Cech, T.R. (1993) Nuclear Proteins That Bind the Pre-mRNA 3’ Splice Site Sequence r(UUAG/G) and the Human Telomeric DNA Sequence d(TTAGGG)n. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13, 301-310.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.13.7.4301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Haider, K., Fang, G., et al. (2004) Human VEGF165-Myoblasts Produce Concomitant Angiogenesis/Myogenesis in the Regenerative Heart. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 263, 173-178.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MCBI.0000041859.60354.f5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sawa, Y., Yoshikawa, Y., Toda, K., et al. (2015) Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Sheets (TCD-51073) for the Treatment of Severe Chronic Heart Failure Due to Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation Journal, 79, 991-999.  
https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suzuki, K., Murtuza, B., Beauchamp, J.R., et al. (2004) Dynamics and Mediators of Acute Graft Attrition after Myoblast Transplantation to the Heart. The FASEB Journal, 18, 1153-1155. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.03-1308fje</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira-Cornwell, M.C., Luo, Y., Narula, N., et al. (2002) Remodeling the Intercalated Disc Leads to Cardiomyopathy in Mice Mis-Expressing Cadherins in the Heart. Journal of Cell Science, 115, 1623-1634.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolmachov, O., Ma, Y.L., Themis, M., et al. (2006) Overexpression of Connexin 43 Using a Retroviral Vector Improves Electrical Coupling of Skeletal Myoblasts with Cardiac Myocytes In Vitro. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 6, Article No. 25.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-6-25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abraham, M.R., Henrikson, C.A., Tung, L., et al. (2005) Antiarrhythmic Engineering of Skeletal Myoblasts for Cardiac Transplantation. Circulation Research, 97, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000174794.22491.a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zebedin, E., Mille, M., Speiser, M., et al. (2007) C2C12 Skeletal Muscle Cells Adopt Cardiac-Like Sodium Current Properties in a Cardiac Cell Environment. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 292, H439-H450.  
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00119.2006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernandez-Aviles, F., Sanz-Ruiz, R., Climent, A.M., Badimon, L., et al. (2017) Global Position Paper on Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine. European Heart Journal, 38, 2532-2546. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx248</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathur, A., Fernandez-Aviles, F., Dimmeler, S., et al. (2017) The Consensus of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 38, 2930-2935. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw640</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Povsic, T.J., O’Connor, C.M., Henry, T., et al. (2011) A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Cardiovascular Effects of Skeletal Myoblast Implantation by Catheter Delivery in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction. American Heart Journal, 162, 654-662.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duckers, H.J., Houtgraaf, J., Hehrlein, C., et al. (2011) Final Results of a Phase IIa, Randomised, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Percutaneous Intramyocardial Transplantation of Autologous Skeletal Myoblasts in Congestive Heart Failure Patients: The SEISMIC Trial. EuroIntervention, 6, 805-812.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menasche, P., et al. (2008) The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) Trial: First Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Myoblast Transplantation. Circulation, 117, 1189-1200.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.734103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menasché, P. (2007) Skeletal Myoblasts as a Therapeutic Agent. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 50, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2007.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steendijk, P., Smits, P.C., Valgimigli, M., et al. (2006) Intramyocardial Injection of Skeletal Myoblasts: Long-Term Follow Up with Pressure-Volume Loops. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 3, S94-S100.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gavira, J.J., Herreros, J., Perez, A., et al. (2006) Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation in Patients with Nonacute Myocardial Infarction: 1-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 131, 799-804.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.11.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernandes, S., Amirault, J.C., Lande, G., et al. (2006) Autologous Myoblast Transplantation after Myocardial Infarction Increases the Inducibility of Ventricular Arrhythmias. Cardiovascular Research, 69, 348-358.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.10.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dib, N., McCarthy, P., Campbell, A., et al. (2005) Feasibility and Safety of Autologous Myoblast Transplantation in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Cell Transplantation, 14, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.3727/000000005783983296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siminiak, T., Fiszer, D., Jerzykowska, O., Grygielska, B., et al. (2005) Percutaneous Trans-Coronary-Venous Transplantation of Autologous Skeletal Myoblasts in the Treatment of Postinfarction Myocardial Contractility Impairment: The POZNAN Trial. European Heart Journal, 26, 1188-1195.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi159</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siminiak, T., Kalawski, R., Fiszer, D., et al. (2004) Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation for the Treatment of Post Infarction Myocardial Injury: Phase I Clinical Study with 12 Months of Follow-Up. American Heart Journal, 148, 531-537.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herreros, J., Prosper, F., Perez, A., et al. (2003) Autologous Intramyocardial Injection of Cultured Skeletal Muscle-Derived Stem Cells in Patients with Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction. European Heart Journal, 24, 2012-2020.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2003.09.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pagani, F.D., DerSimonian, H., Zawadzka, A., et al. (2003) Autologous Skeletal Myoblasts Transplanted to Ischemia-Damaged Myocardium in Humans. Histological Analysis of Cell Survival and Differentiation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 879-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00081-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menasché, A.A., Hagège, J.T., Vilquin, M., et al. (2003) Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation for Severe Postinfarction Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 1078-1083.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00092-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghostine, S., Carrion, C., Souza, L.C., et al. (2002) Long-Term Efficacy of Myoblast Transplantation on Regional Structure and Function after Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 106, I131-I136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menasche, P., Vilquin, J.T. and Desnos, M. (2001) Early Results of Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation in Patients with Severe Ischemic Heart Failure. Circulation, 104, II-598.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menasche, P., et al. (2001) Myoblast Transplantation for Heart Failure. The Lancet, 357, 279-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03617-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haider, H.Kh., Jiang, S.J., Ye, L., et al. (2004) Effectiveness of Transient Immunosuppression Using Cyclosporine for Xenomyoblast Transplantation for Cardiac Repair. Transplantation Proceedings, 36, 232-235.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Chin, S.P., Hung, H.D., Nguyen, T.N. and Feng, Q.Z. (2008) Delivery of Biologics for Angiogenesis and Myogenesis. In: Nguyen, T., Colombo, A., Hu, D., Grines, C.L. and Saito, S., Eds., Practical Handbook of Advanced Interventional Cardiology, 3rd Edition, Blackwell Futura, Malden, 584-596.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444312584.ch30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K. (1995) Methods for Human Myoblast Culture and Transplantation. In: Ricordi, C., Ed., Methods in Cell Transplantation, R. G. Landes, Austin, TX, 707-735.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Goodwin, T.G., Fang, Q., et al. (1992) Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Myoblast Transfer Therapy on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Boys. Cell Transplantation, 1, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689792001002-305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Law, D.M., Lu, P., et al. (2006) Human Myoblast Genome Therapy. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 3, 135-151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Weinstein, J., Ben Hain, S., et al. (2000) World’s First Human Myoblast Transfer into the Heart. Frontiers in Physiology, A85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., et al. (2019) Myoblasts Provide Safe and Effective Treatments for Hereditary Muscular Dystrophies, Cardiomyopathies, Type 2 Diabetes, Solid Tumors and Aging. In: Haider, K.H. and Aziz, S., Eds., Stem Cells—From Hype to Real Hope, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, 71-97.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110587043-004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Goodwin, T.G., Fang, Q., et al. (1998) Myoblast Transfer as a Platform Technology of Gene Therapy. Gene Therapy &amp; Molecular Biology, 1, 345-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K. (1994) Myoblast Transfer: Gene Therapy for Muscular Dystrophy. RG Landes Co., Austin, TX, 1-164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, D.A., et al. (1998) Regenerating Functional Myocardium: Improved Performance after Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation. Nature Medicine, 4, 929-933.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0898-929</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koh, G.Y., Klug, M.G., Soonpaa, M.H. and Field, L.J. (1993) Differentiation and Long-Term Survival of C2C12 Myoblast Grafts in Heart. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 92, 1548-1554. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116734</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Di Donna, S., Mamchaoui, K., Cooper, R.N., et al. (2003) Telomerase Can Extend the Proliferative Capacity of Human Myoblasts but Does Not Lead to Their Immortalization. Molecular Cancer Research, 1, 643-653.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Bertorini, T., Goodwin, T.G., et al. (1990) Dystrophin Production Induced by Myoblast Transfer Therapy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. The Lancet, 336, 114-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)91628-N</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.107173-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Law, P.K., Sim, E.K.W., Haider, Kh.H., et al. (2004) Myoblast Genome Therapy and the Regenerative Heart. In: Kipshidze, N.N. and Serruys, P.W., Eds., Handbook of Cardiovascular Cell Transplantation, Martin Dunitz, UK, 241-258.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>