<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2380-4327</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jhepgc.2021.71017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC-106923</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in Carmeli Cosmology—Mass Density, Temperature and Expansion Rate of the Early Universe
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Firmin</surname><given-names>J. Oliveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>East Asian Observatory/James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, Hilo, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>333</fpage><lpage>343</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Carmeli Cosmological Special Relativity theory (CSR) is used to study the universe at early times after the big bang. The universe temperature vs. time relation is developed from the mass density relation. It is shown that CSR is well suited to analyze the nucleosynthesis of the light elements up to beryllium, equivalent to the standard model.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Big Bang Nucleosynthesis</kwd><kwd> Carmeli Cosmology</kwd><kwd> Nucleosynthesis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Although Carmeli described the temperature of the early universe using his own Cosmological Special Relativity (CSR) theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref3">3</xref>], it was about an order of magnitude lower than the standard model. But closer study reveals that when proper account is taken for the internal degrees of freedom of the elementary particles at the epoch of nucleosynthesis, that the temperature vs. time relationship so obtained is equivalent with that of the standard model. This, by itself, would make the nucleosynthesis reactions analysis for CSR identical with the results of the standard model. In this regard, we will not carry out any light element synthesis since these have already been adequately explored [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref4">4</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mass Density</title><p>In CSR, the redshift z of light emitted in the past at time t' when the size of the universe had a radius of R(t') is defined by</p><p>1 + z = R 0 R ( t ′ ) , (1)</p><p>where R<sub>0</sub> is the radius of the universe at the present epoch of time. It can be shown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref5">5</xref>] that the relation for z takes the form</p><p>1 + z = 1 + t ′ / τ 1 − t ′ / τ , (2)</p><p>where τ is the Hubble-Carmeli time constant, the age of the universe in Carmeli cosmology. Combining (1) and (2), in CSR, a distance R<sub>0</sub> measured by an observer at the present epoch time t ′ = 0 , transforms to the distance R(t') for a time t' in the past given by</p><p>R ( t ′ ) = R 0 1 − t ′ / τ 1 + t ′ / τ , (3)</p><p>with the limit into the past being the big bang time t ′ = τ . Note that in the Carmeli cosmological theory, time is measured from the present at t ′ = 0 toward the past at time t ′ &gt; 0 . The Hubble constant H 0 ≈ 1 / τ . If we take R 0 = φ 0 ( t ′ ) c τ to be the radial distance to the edge of the universe, where c is the speed of light in vacuum and φ<sub>0</sub>(t') is a scaling factor, then R(t') from (3) is the universe radius at a past time t'.</p><p>For nucleosynthesis studies it is conventional to measure time from the big bang toward the present. Transforming (3) by the change of variable t = τ – t ′ , we have for the universe radius</p><p>R ( t ) = ϕ 0 ( t ) c τ 2 τ / t − 1 , (4)</p><p>wheret is the time measured from the big bang when t = 0 toward the present when t = τ and the scaling factor</p><p>ϕ 0 ( t ) = T 0 T 0 past   if     t &lt; 1.98 &#215; 10 13 sec . , ϕ 0 ( t ) = 1   otherwise . (5)</p><p>where T 0 ≈ 2.73   K is the present CMB temperature and T 0past ≈ 14 .42   K is the past radiation field temperature, for which we will give a derivation subsequently. Note that the cutoff time t c = 1.98 &#215; 10 13 sec . is an approximate time representing the recombination time when the universe temperature was 0.3 eV, and this cutoff time should expect to be tweaked when studying that period.</p><p>The mass density ρ(t) of the universe is defined to be composed of a relativistic mass density ρ<sub>r</sub>(t) and a non-relativistic mass density ρ<sub>m</sub>(t), where the total mass density ρ ( t ) = ρ r ( t ) + ρ m ( t ) .</p><p>We define the non-relativistic mass density in the usual way,</p><p>ρ m ( t ) = M m V ( t ) , (6)</p><p>where M<sub>m</sub> is the total non-relativistic (rest) mass of the universe and V(t) is the volume of the universe. The non-relativistic mass is defined by</p><p>M m = g t M = g t f m ( τ c 3 4 G ) , (7)</p><p>where M = f m τ c 3 / 4 G is the total mass of the universe and f<sub>m</sub> and g<sub>t</sub> are coefficients which depend on the baryon to photon number density ratio η and the baryon number density n<sub>B</sub> at the present time. Expressions for these constant coefficients will be shown to be given by</p><p>g t = 1 ( ζ k B T 0 / η m p c 2 ) + 1 , (8)</p><p>f m = 2 Ω B [ ( ζ k B T 0 / η m p c 2 ) + 1 ] , (9)</p><p>where ζ ≈ 2.70 is the black body average energy coefficient, G is Newton’s gravitational constant, k<sub>B</sub> is Boltzmann’s constant, T 0 ≈ 2.73   K is the present CMB temperature and the baryon density parameter Ω B = m p n B / ρ c , where m<sub>p</sub> is the proton mass and ρ c = 3 / 8 π G τ 2 is the critical mass density. We use the standard value τ = 4.28 &#215; 10 17 s . For η ≈ 6.61 &#215; 10 − 10 and Ω B ≈ 0.046 , we have g t ≈ 0.999 and f m ≈ 0.093 .</p><p>The relativistic mass is defined by</p><p>M r ( t ) = f m ( 1 − g t ) ( τ c 3 4 G ) ( c τ R ( t ) ) . (10)</p><p>The volume for Euclidean flat space is given by</p><p>V ( t ) = 4 3 π R 3 ( t ) . (11)</p><p>The non-relativistic mass density (6), using (7) and (11) is given by</p><p>ρ m ( t ) = M m V ( t ) = ( f m g t ϕ 0 3 ( t ) ) ( 3 16 π G τ 2 ) [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 3 / 2 . (12)</p><p>The relativistic mass density ρ<sub>r</sub>(t), using (10) and (11), is given by</p><p>ρ r ( t ) = M r ( t ) V ( t ) = ( f m ( 1 − g t ) ϕ 0 4 ( t ) ) ( 3 16 π G τ 2 ) [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 2 . (13)</p><p>The total mass density parameter is given by the sum of (12) and (13) divided by the critical density ρ<sub>c</sub>,</p><p>Ω ( t ) = ρ r ( t ) + ρ m ( t ) ρ c = [ f m ( 1 − g t ) ϕ 0 4 ( t ) ] [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 2 ( 1 + ϕ 0 ( t ) [ g t / ( 1 − g t ) ] [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 1 / 2 ) . (14)</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the total mass density parameter Ω(t) for the first 1000 seconds since the big bang. Using (8) and (9) in (14), the total mass density parameter at the present epoch t = τ takes on the value Ω ( τ ) = f m 2 = Ω B [ ( ζ k B T 0 / η m p c 2 ) + 1 ] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Mass Density vs. Temperature</title><p>Assuming that the universe expands adiabatically, the relativistic density ρ<sub>s</sub>(T) of the universe is related to the temperature by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>ρ s ( T ) = ( π 2 g a ( T ) 30 ) T 4 , (15)</p><p>where g<sub>a</sub>(T) is the effective number of degrees of freedom for the particles involved in the annihilation process at temperature T, where T is in MeV. Take the density (13), scale it and convert it from ergs to MeV and equate it to (15), yielding,</p><p>( ζ M e V 8 ) ( ϕ 0 4 ( t ) f m ( 1 − g t ) ) ρ r = ( 3 ζ M e V 32 π G ) ( 1 t − 1 2 τ ) 2 = ( π 2 g a ( T ) 30 ) T 4 , (16)</p><p>where M e V ≈ 6 .24 &#215; 10 5   MeV ⋅ erg − 1 . Equation (16) can be put into the form of time (seconds) since the big bang as a function of temperature (MeV),</p><p>t ( T ) = 2 τ 2 τ ( 16 π 3 G g a ( T ) / 45 ) ( 1 / ζ M e V ) T 2 + 1 . (17)</p><p>Equation (16) can also be put into the form of temperature (MeV) as a function of time (seconds) since the big bang,</p><p>T ( t ) = ( 45 ζ M e V 16 π 3 G g a ( T ) ) 1 / 4 ( 1 t − 1 2 τ ) . (18)</p><p>Setting g a ( T ) = 3.363 (after e+, e− annihilation when the temperature T &lt; 500   keV and the neutrinos have decoupled), setting t = τ and ignoring any further reactions such as the recombination period when the temperature was around 0.3 eV, (18) gives</p><p>T 0past T ( τ ) ≈ 14.42   K , (19)</p><p>which we used in (5).</p><p>Since ( 1 / 2 τ ) ≪ ( 1 / t ) at early times, it can be neglected so that (18) can be written more simply</p><p>T 2 ( t ) = ( 2.4255 3.363 ) ( 1 t ) , (20)</p><p>which is equivalent to the expression in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref6">6</xref>], Eq. 43,</p><p>T 2 ( t ) = ( 2.4 g a ) ( 1 t ) , (21)</p><p>for g a = 3.363 . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the temperature of the expanding universe for the first 100 seconds since the big bang. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the temperature of the universe for the first 1000 seconds.</p><p>The equivalence of the Carmeli big bang temperature model (20) with the standard model (21), implies that light element reaction analysis using Carmeli’s model will agree with the standard model nucleosynthesis results.</p><p>Expansion rate equation H(t)</p><p>We now take the time rate of change d R ( t ) / d t of the universe radius given by (4) relative to R(t), obtaining the expansion rate H(t),</p><p>H ( t ) = ( 1 R ( t ) ) d d t R ( t ) = ( 1 R ( t ) ) d d t ( R 0 2 τ / t − 1 ) = ( 1 2 ) [ 1 t + 1 2 τ − t ] ≈ 1 2 t (22)</p><p>where the approximation is good for t ≪ τ as is the case for BBN. This is equivalent to the standard Friedmann-Lema&#238;tre-Robertson-Walker expansion rate for Euclidean space (zero curvature) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref7">7</xref>], implying that we are in agreement with the standard big bang model.</p><p>Derivation of f<sub>m</sub> and g<sub>t</sub></p><p>We derive expressions for f<sub>m</sub> and g<sub>t</sub> in terms of the baryon to photon number ratio η ( t ) = n B ( t ) / n γ ( t ) , where n<sub>B</sub>(t) is the baryon number density and n<sub>γ</sub>(t) is the photon number density, and where n B ( t ) = ρ m ( t ) / m p , where m<sub>p</sub> is the proton rest mass and n γ ( t ) = ρ r ( t ) c 2 / ζ k B T ( t ) , where ζ k B T ( t ) is the average energy of the photons in the black body radiation field at temperature T(t). Using (12) and (13) we have</p><p>n B ( t ) = ρ m ( t ) m p = ( f m g t ϕ 0 3 ( t ) m p ) ( 3 16 π G τ 2 ) [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 3 / 2 , (23)</p><p>n γ ( t ) = ρ r ( t ) c 2 ζ k B T ( t ) = [ f m ( 1 − g t ) ϕ 3 ( t ) ζ k B T 0 ] ( 3 c 2 16 π G τ 2 ) [ ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 ] 3 / 2 , (24)</p><p>η = n B ( t ) n γ ( t ) = ζ k B T 0 g t m p c 2 ( 1 − g t ) , (25)</p><p>where T(t) is the temperature (K) at time t since the big bang and is given by</p><p>T ( t ) = T 0 ( c τ R ( t ) ) = ( T 0 ϕ 0 ( t ) ) ( 2 τ / t ) − 1 , (26)</p><p>where ϕ 0 ( t ) is given by (5).</p><p>From (24) we can solve for g<sub>t</sub>,</p><p>g t = 1 ( ζ k B T 0 / η m p c 2 ) + 1 <sub>.</sub> (27)</p><p>Using (23) for n<sub>B</sub>(τ) at time t = τ and (27) for g<sub>t</sub>, we can solve for f<sub>m</sub>,</p><p>f m = ( n B m p g t ) ( 16 π G τ 2 3 ) = 2 Ω B [ ( ζ k B T 0 / η m p c 2 ) + 1 ] , (28)</p><p>where n B = n B ( τ ) and Ω B = m p n B / ρ c .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>We have shown that CSR is quite adequate for a development of a nuclear physical analysis of the very early moments of the universe, from 10<sup>−3</sup> sec. to 10<sup>3</sup> sec. The modeling assumes two possible final temperatures for the universe, T 0past ≈ 14 .42   K , which is the temperature the universe would attain at the present epoch if there were no recombination at time t c ≈ 1.98 &#215; 10 13 sec . , and T 0 ≈ 2 .73   K , which is the present CMB temperature including the recombination period when the temperature was about 0.3 eV (3500 K). The details of the transition in temperature at the recombination period are not covered in this report, but we should expect some modifications to the temperature profile when that analysis is carried out.</p><p>Consider the neutron to proton ratio using CSR based on [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref4">4</xref>], Equation (1),</p><p>( n p ) = exp ( − Q T ) , (29)</p><p>where n is the number of neutrons, p is the number of protons, Q = m n − m p = 1.293   MeV , where m n and m p are the masses of the neutron and proton, respectively, and T is the temperature in MeV. The neutron mean lifetime τ n ≈ 889.1   sec . (Hikasa, et al. 1992.) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> is a plot of the neutron to proton ratio using (29).</p><p>Substituting for temperature T as a function of time t from (20) into (29) yields the neutron to proton ratio as a function of time,</p><p>( n p ) = exp ( − a Q t ) , (30)</p><p>where a = ( 3.363 ) 1 / 4 / ( 2.4255 ) 1 / 2 . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> is a plot of the neutron to proton ratio using (30).</p><p>The relativistic mass density ρ<sub>S</sub>(T) of (15) along with (16) is equivalent to the</p><p>energy density given by Eq. (22.41) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref8">8</xref>]. This determines that the temperature T ≈ 1   MeV at time t ≈ 1   sec . , shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, is as required for the synthesis of the light elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref9">9</xref>], Sect. 23.1. Thus, Carmeli’s CSR theory, taking into account the internal degrees of freedom of the particles involved in the processes, has a well suited framework to describe the details of primordial nucleosynthesis.</p><p>Using (4), the rate of acceleration of the expanding universe is given by the time rate of change of the Hubble parameter H(t), defined in (22), and is given by</p><p>H ˙ ( t ) = R &#168; ( t ) R ( t ) − H 2 ( t ) , (31)</p><p>where &#183; = d / d t .</p><p>The standard Lambda-Cold-Dark-Matter model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref11">11</xref>], indicates that the rate of the expansion has been accelerating from around 10 billion years after the big bang when the redshift was z ≈ 0.4 . This is in contrast to the CSR model. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> is shown the acceleration Ḣ(t) from (31) for present cosmic times. We note that the acceleration remains negative (deceleration) from the big bang era up to the present. There is no need for the concept of dark matter and dark energy in the CSR model of the universe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106923-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>A plot of Ω(t) for the present times from around 2.26 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> years up to 13.6 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> years since the big bang is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. The density decreases through unity and ends up at the current value of Ω 0 ≈ Ω B ≈ 0.046 . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> is</p><p>shown the matter density parameter from (12), Ω m ( t ) = ρ m ( t ) / ρ c , for the first 1000 seconds since the big bang.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Oliveira, F.J. (2021) Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in Carmeli Cosmology—Mass Density, Temperature and Expansion Rate of the Early Universe. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 7, 333-343. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.71017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.106923-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Behar, S. and Carmeli, M. (2000) Cosmological Relativity: A New Theory of Cosmology. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 39, 1375-1396. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003651222960https://arxiv.org/astro-ph/000835</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmeli, M. (2006) Cosmological Relativity. World Scientific, Singapore.https://doi.org/10.1142/6275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmeli, M. (2008) Relativity: Modern Large-Scale Spacetime Structure of the Cosmos. World Scientific, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/6820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, M.S., Kawano, L.H. and Malaney, R.A. (1993) Experimental, Computational and Observational Analysis of Primordial Nucleosynthesis. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 85, 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1086/191763</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, F.J. (2016) Cosmic Time Transformations in Cosmological Relativity. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 253-279. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2016.22022https://file.scirp.org/pdf/JHEPGC_2016041914511433.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kurki-Suonio, H. (2018) Thermal History of the Early Universe in Cosmology I, Lecture notes fall 2018. https://www.courses.physics.helsinki.fi/teor/cosmology/Cosm4.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinberg, S. (2008) Cosmology. Oxford University Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olive, K.A. and Peacock, J.A. (2014) Big-Bang Cosmology. Chinese Physics C, 38, 327-338.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fields, B.D., Molaro, P. and Sarkar, S. (2014) Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis. Chinese Physics C, 38, 339-344. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1408.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riess, A.G., Strolger, L.-G., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H.C., Mobasher, B., et al. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frieman, J.A., Turner, M.S. and Huterer, D. (2008) Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 46, 385-432. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krizek, M. and Somer, L. (2014) A Critique of the Standard Cosmological Model. Tutorial Neural Network World, 24, 435-461. https://dx.doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2014.24.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106923-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krizek, M. (2018) Ten Arguments Against the Proclaimed Amount of Dark Matter. Gravitation and Cosmology, 24, 350-359. https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S020228931804014X</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>