<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NJGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>New Journal of Glass and Ceramics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7554</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/njgc.2021.111002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NJGC-106799</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Structural Role of CeO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; in the Modified Borate Glass-Ceramics
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nada</surname><given-names>ElBaz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gomaa</surname><given-names>El-Damrawi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amr</surname><given-names>M. Abdelghany</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Glass Research Group, Faculty of Science, Physics Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Spectroscopy Department, Physics Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>01</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A new type of cerium borate glass-ceramic is prepared and studied. The microstructure and crystallization behaviors of the glass samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron diffraction (ED), and 
  <sup>31</sup>
  P NMR spectroscopy. The microstructures of samples contain &lt;1 mol% CeO
  <sub>2</sub>
   
  are amorphous in nature. More addition of CeO<sub>2</sub> transforms the glass to glass-ceramics without thermal annealing. The morphological change of the microstructure of these materials was followed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The obtained results have revealed that the addition of more than 0.8 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub> can promote nucleation and crystallization routes that 
  are 
  combined with the establishment of diverse crystalline phases. Glasses with lower contents of CeO<sub>2</sub>showed no tendency to crystallization. The crystals of CeO<sub>2</sub> containing glasses were spheroid like morphology that 
  was 
  assigned to the three-dimensional fast growth of the well-formed structural species in the boro-apatite phase. In addition, the cerium free glass is characterized by particle-like morphology. Then the growth of spheroid species in three-dimension plays better compatibility and bioactivity behavior than that of the other types of morphology. This is may because the spherical shape has a higher surface area than that of the needle-like morphology. Accumulation and aggregation of small-sized spheres from cerium borate phases played the role of enhancing the hardness of the studied materials.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cerium Borate</kwd><kwd> Glass Morphology</kwd><kwd> Crystalline State</kwd><kwd> Spheroid Species</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It has been reported previously that the hydrated calcium phosphate structure known as hydroxyapatite (HA) is considered to be biocompatible with human hard tissues and displays Osseo conductive characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref2">2</xref>]. Accordingly, HA can be assumed as superior material for clinical and medical applications. However, HA is well known to have reduced mechanical strength in comparison with natural bone. This drawback is assumed to be the most serious obstacle for some specific claims, particularly for load-bearing implants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref4">4</xref>]. For this reason, bioactive glass-ceramics are considered as alternatives to the pure HA to be used as fillers and bone graft [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref5">5</xref>]. This may due to their enhanced hardness and mechanical strength which lead to their good ability to form strong bonds with living bone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref6">6</xref>]. Besides, the apatite of such bioglass-ceramics has to be characterized by its good crystalline structure. The enhanced crystallinity leads to mechanical strength and biocompatibility stronger than that of the pure HA. Consequently, load bearing applications appear to need a perfect mix of bioactivity and preferred mechanical characteristics of crystalline apatite phases to be used.</p><p>Recently, developing new biomaterials was focused on silica free glasses and glass-ceramics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref9">9</xref>] resulting from the ease crystallization of the apatite phases through stimulating suitable environments including doping with activating agents such as CeO<sub>2</sub>, Nd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, CrF<sub>2</sub>, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref12">12</xref>]. Besides, the precipitation of crystalline apatite phases within the as-prepared glass network was expected to be enhanced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref10">10</xref>]. It was reported that amorphous glasses were considered to have a limited bioactivity in comparison to that of natural bones. But the crystallized glass-ceramics can simply possess the biocompatibility and tight bonding to the bone subsequent in the growth of healthy tissues to their surfaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Mechanical properties were observed to be enhanced using different amalgamations among apatite and various glass phases. Amongst them, apatite Ca<sub>5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>, wollastonite (CaSiO<sub>3</sub>) or CaTeO<sub>3</sub> have been suggested to be used as clinically bone-repairing materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref15">15</xref>]. Besides, flour—apatite (Ca<sub>5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> F—is conveyed as a customary type which is can be considered as a promising material in biodental applications including dental roots, and joint prostheses.</p><p>Recent researches have been focused on silicate free glasses as bioactive materials. Studies on borate and mixed former borophosphates, to our knowledge, are growing field of studies reported by several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref9">9</xref>]. Therefore, trials will be done in this work to explore the bioactive properties and structure of borate glass-ceramics as a new biomaterial. Moreover, borate glasses containing CeO<sub>2</sub> (as an agent for crystallization) will be studied. The presence of CeO<sub>2</sub> in the network of borate network will enhance the bioactivity of the material since CeO<sub>2</sub> is reported to be used as a nucleating and crystallizing agent of apatite and wollastonite phases.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Methods</title><p>Glasses of basic composition xCeO<sub>2</sub>∙(45 − x)B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>∙24.5Na<sub>2</sub>O∙24.5CaO∙6P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> were synthesized using ordinary melt annealing technique. Pure analytical grade chemical of ceric oxide supplied by Sigma Aldrich Co., orthoboric acid, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium and calcium were used in their carbonate form supplied by ElNasr pharmaceuticals. Glass nomination and composition was listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>X-ray diffractogram of the studied samples is recorded using PAN analytical X-Pert PRO machine operated with 30 kV utilizing copper target with λ<sub>k</sub><sub>α</sub> = 1.540 &#197; within Braggs angles extended from 4˚ to 70˚. Surface and bulky morphologies of studied samples were recorded using (JEOL, JSM-5400) scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM. TEM) supported with EDAX and ED units, respectively. Studied samples were coated with a thin layer of gold. The Vickers microhardness numbers (HV) was recorded as an average of 15 indentation in a triplicate sample measured in a polished surface using FM-7 micro hardness tester at 25-g force load to ensure homogeneity and reproducibility of measurements.</p><p><sup>31</sup>P MAS NMR experiments were also conducted at resonance frequency (202.4 MHz) using a 3.2 mm diameter rotor spinning at 15 kHz. Solid NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was used as a secondary reference compound and the signal from this set to 0.8 ppm. A pulse length of 2.5 μs and a recycle delay of 5 s was applied.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> show the XRD spectra of the studied glasses as a function of CeO<sub>2</sub> concentration. The XRD spectra of glasses which contain low CeO<sub>2</sub> concentration (0, 0.5 and 0.8) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> possess a wide hump that supports the amorphous structure of these glasses. On the other hand, glasses of higher CeO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) exhibit intense sharp diffraction peaks superimposed on a widespread diffraction hump. The sharpness of several peaks may is due to the presence of different phases enriched with fine crystals in the investigated samples.</p><p>Positions of indicated sharp diffraction peaks on XRD diffractogram shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> is compatible with that reported for cerium sodium borate and calcium</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Glass abbreviation and composition</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abbr.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CeO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>phosphate phases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref16">16</xref>]. These phases were classified as Ca<sub>2</sub>CeB<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub> and Na<sub>4</sub>CeB<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, in combination with various calcium phosphate phases as, Ca<sub>2</sub>(P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>) and CaCe(PO<sub>3</sub>). These phases were considered to be amongst the most bioactive and biocompatible phases in the matrix of the borophosphate glass-ceramics network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>The crystalline phases presented by CeO<sub>2</sub> rich borate glasses can precipitate apatite units with Ca/P ratio near to unity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref19">19</xref>]. This leads that adequate degree of crystallinity is enhanced by the effect of more CeO<sub>2</sub> addition as can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>Results based on TEM and EDP, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) agree well with that obtained from XRD. Both would confirm the amorphous nature of glasses containing low concentrations of CeO<sub>2</sub>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) is introduced as an example (0.8 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub>). There are no resolved electron diffraction patterns due to the amorphous nature of glassy samples while no ordered structure can be detected. Then it can be concluded that the ceramics with CeO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 1 mol% show a common microstructure that contains nonuniform distributed species. On the other hand, TEM micrographs of samples contain higher CeO<sub>2</sub> concentration indicates that spheroids</p><p>morphology as the most dominant morphology. Such spheroid crystals can be observed to cover utmost of the studied area of the sample under investigation. The growing of spherical crystals (Figures 4(b)-(d)) is the main feature of the cerium ions which can be distributed in any glass composition. Simply, on increasing CeO<sub>2</sub> contents the microstructure is appeared to contain clearer distributed species with less grain boundaries and less porosities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). However, larger amounts of CeO<sub>2</sub> result in the complexation of microstructure. For the ceramics with CeO<sub>2</sub> = 8, 15 and 20 mol%, the microstructure becomes crowded with some anisometric layers containing some polycrystalline species. The existence of these interconnected layers, can enhance the mechanical strength, since the hardness-number <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> is found to increase with increasing CeO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. This is attributed to the increase of CeO<sub>4</sub> concentration which leads to enhancing the phase formation caused by higher content of CeO<sub>4</sub>. The presence of the polycrystalline phases enriched with CeO<sub>4</sub> enhances the hardness number of the glass and decreases the crack length due to indentation processes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and reduces the grain growth.</p><p>It can be shown from TEM micrographs that the capacity of precipitated crystal increases with increasing CeO<sub>2</sub> concentration. For instance, accumulation of the precipitated crystals is increased and distributed in multilayers which causes a darkness of the bulk structure of the investigated sample. The high capacity of the crystalline species results in the interconnections between the spheres distributed in several layers. The EDP of cerium rich phase, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, clearly reveals the sharpest diffraction rings confirmed the highest crystallinity of composition contains 20 mol%.</p><p>The surface morphology of two selected samples is represented by scanning electron micrographs (SEM) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. It can be shown that there is a great difference between the morphologies presented for sample of low CeO<sub>2</sub> (0.8 mol%) and of the highest CeO<sub>2</sub> concentration (20 mol%). The scanned surface of sample of 20 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub> contains a crystalline species of larger size than that presented for sample of 0.8 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub>. The capacity of the accumulated phases is considered as the main reason for appearance of EDS peak with higher intensity than that of 0.8 glass. In addition, EDEX spectra a composition of 20 mol%</p><p>CeO<sub>2</sub> contains duple peak for Ce<sup>2+</sup> ions which confirm more accumulation of crystalline borate species involving Ce ions.</p><p><sup>31</sup>P MAS NMR experiments offer direct information about the Q<sup>n</sup> units in the phosphate network of the investigated glasses. (Q) is P ions and (n) is the number of bridging bonds. The Q<sup>0</sup> species have been found in the main glass network. It is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> that the chemical shift value of glasses containing 0 and 2 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub> is in the order of Q0 species (9 ppm) which is the dominant structural species. The frequency peaks of glasses of 0 and 2 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub> compositions are considered to corresponding to orthophosphate Na<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> or Ca<sub>3</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> or mixing between them. Adding of more CeO<sub>2</sub> has some effect on the <sup>31</sup>P-NMR spectra, since the value of chemical shift is relatively changed in composition of 12 and 20 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub> glasses (around 2 ppm for composition 20 mol% CeO<sub>2</sub>), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. These changes may be considered due to a mixture of cerium sodium</p><p>or calcium phosphate crystalline phases. The decrease of chemical shift from 9 to 2 ppm means that some of cerium cations are coordinated with PO<sub>4</sub> groups forming cerium phosphate phases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106799-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>There is a second remark on <sup>31</sup>P NMR spectra of glass containing 12 and 20 mol CeO<sub>2</sub>. The spectra are relatively broader than that of glasses containing 0 and 2 mol%. This may be considered due to formation of some ordered apatite phases containing Ce ions as a charge compensator, since Ce-O-P bond is longer than that of P-ONa<sup>+</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>From all above spectra, it can be concluded that the small change in NMR chemical shift of phosphate network (9 to 2 ppm) upon CeO<sub>2</sub> addition should be due to some modification of phosphate network by CeO<sub>2</sub>. This means that few of CeO<sub>2</sub> are consumed to modify the phosphate network. But most of CeO<sub>2</sub> concentrations are highly consumed to modify B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> network resulting in creation high reduction in the fraction of boron tetrahedral units.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>ElBaz, N., El-Damrawi, G. and Abdelghany, A.M. (2021) Structural Role of CeO<sub>2</sub> in the Modified Borate Glass-Ceramics. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 11, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.4236/njgc.2021.111002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.106799-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ning, C.Q. and Zhou, Y. (2002) In Vitro Bioactivity of a Biocomposite Fabricated from HA and Ti Powders by Powder Metallurgy Method. Biomaterials, 23, 2909-2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00419-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Y., Hench, L.L., Du, J., Choy, K.L. and Guo, J. (2004) Preparation of Hydroxyapatite Fibers by Electrospinning Technique. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 87, 1988-1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb06351.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gautier, S., Champion, E., Bernache-Assollant, D. and Chartier, T. (1999) Rheological Characteristics of Alumina Platelet-Hydroxyapatite Composite Suspensions. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 19, 469-477.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00224-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varini, E., Sánchez-Salcedo, S., Malavasi, G., Lusvardi, G., Vallet-Regí, M. and Salinas, A.J. (2019) Cerium (III) and (IV) Containing Mesoporous Glasses/Alginate Beads for Bone Regeneration: Bioactivity, Biocompatibility and Reactive Oxygen Species Activity. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 105, Article ID: 109971.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109971</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atkinson, I., Anghel, E.M., Petrescu, S., Seciu, A.M., Stefan, L.M., Mocioiu, O.C., Zaharescu, M., et al. (2019) Cerium-Containing Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses: Material Characterization, In Vitro Bioactivity, Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity Evaluation. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 276, 76-88.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.09.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelghany, A.M., Meikhail, M.S., Hegazy, E., Badr, S.I. and Agag, D.A. (2019) Synthesis of Borate Modified Bioactive Glass Scaffold Using PVP Burning-Out Method for Bone Tissue Replacement. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 9, 4044-4049. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC94.044049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouis, M.A., Abdelghany, A.M. and ElBatal, H.A. (2012) Corrosion Mechanism and Bioactivity of Borate Glasses Analogue to Hench’s Bioglass. Processing and Application of Ceramics, 6, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAC1203141O</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, R.S., Huang, J.G., Lu, L. and Xu, Y. (1988) Study of the New Boron-Rich Calcium Rare Earth Borate CaLnB7O13. Materials Research Bulletin, 23, 1699-1704.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(88)90178-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menazea, A.A. and Abdelghany, A.M. (2020) Gamma Irradiated Hench’s Bioglass and Their Derivatives Hench’s Bioglass-Ceramic for Bone Bonding Efficiency. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 174, Article ID: 108932. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108932</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kokubo, T. (1998) Apatite Formation on Surfaces of Ceramics, Metals and Polymers in Body Environment. Acta Materialia, 46, 2519-2527.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)80036-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Verne, E., Ferraris, M. and Jana, C. (1999) Pressureless Sintering of Bioverit&amp;reg; III/Ti Particle Biocomposites. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 19, 2039-2047.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00036-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vogel, W. and Holand, W. (1987) The Development of Bioglass Ceramics for Medical Applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 26, 527-544.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.198705271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Damrawi, G., Abou Elzahab, M., Dowadair, A. and Hosny, A. (2019) Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Study on Phosphosilicate Glasses. Magnetic Resonance in Solids, Electronic Journal, 21, 19102. https://doi.org/10.26907/mrsej-19102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eslami, M., Hamnabard, Z. and Nemati, A. (2013) Synthesis and Spectral Properties of Nd-Doped Glass-Ceramics in SiO2-CaO-MgO System Prepared by Sol-Gel Method. Journal of Rare Earths, 31, 595-599.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60326-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaur, P., Singh, K.J., Yadav, A.K., Kaur, S., Kaur, R. and Kaur, S. (2020) Growth of Bone like Hydroxyapatite and Cell Viability Studies on CeO2 Doped CaO-P2O5-MgO-SiO2 Bioceramics. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 243, Article ID: 122352.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ElBatal, H.A., El-Kheshen, A.A., Ghoneim, N.A., Marzouk, M.A., ElBatal, F.H., Fayad, A.M., El-Beih, A.A., et al. (2019) In Vitro Bioactivity Behavior of Some Borophosphate Glasses Containing Dopant of ZnO, CuO or SrO Together with Their Glass-Ceramic Derivatives and Their Antimicrobial Activity. Silicon, 11, 197-208.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9845-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoppe, A., Güldal, N.S. and Boccaccini, A.R. (2011) A Review of the Biological Response to Ionic Dissolution Products from Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics. Biomaterials, 32, 2757-2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahaman, M.N., Day, D.E., Bal, B.S., Fu, Q., Jung, S.B., Bonewald, L.F. and Tomsia, A.P. (2011) Bioactive Glass in Tissue Engineering. Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 2355-2373.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arcos, D. and Vallet-Regí, M. (2010) Sol-Gel Silica-Based Biomaterials and Bone Tissue Regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 6, 2874-2888.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boccaccini, A.R., Erol, M., Stark, W.J., Mohn, D., Hong, Z. and Mano, J.F. (2010) Polymer/Bioactive Glass Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Composites Science and Technology, 70, 1764-1776.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106799-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, W. and Hench, L.L. (1996) Bioactive Materials. Ceramics International, 22, 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>