<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMSi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4018</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmsi.2021.91004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMSi-106660</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Empirical Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation on the African Continent Based on Factors of Location and Season
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olabode</surname><given-names>M. Bamigbola</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shola</surname><given-names>E. Atolagbe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The importance of accurate knowledge about available global solar radiation in the design and development of various solar energy systems cannot be overemphasized. Most of the available models for predicting global solar radiation involve a plethora of input factors, some of which require special skills and equipment to measure. Such multi-factor models are complex and computationally demanding. To remove some burdens associated with such models, the use of
   simplified prototypes with reduced input factors ha
  s
   been proposed. It has 
  been 
  shown that a model with fewer input factors, that can be determined in a definite manner or whose attributes are directly observable, is often a better alternative. Therefore, the main object of this paper is to have models with a few variables that can easily be measured, developed for predicting global solar radiation. Two input factors
  , 
  geographical location and season of the year
  , 
  were considered. Using a 22-year interannual average daily insolation data from the database of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) blended with the art of interpolation, empirical models were fashioned with 
  the data for the five subregions of Africa. The results of the models’ analysis indicate that the latitude component is the dominant locational factor. Furthermore, the new models exhibit optimal performance in comparison with existing models and constitute reliable predictive tools that are suitable for estimating global solar radiation for any practical application.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Solar Radiation</kwd><kwd> Modelling</kwd><kwd> Empirical Data</kwd><kwd> Prediction</kwd><kwd> Interpolation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Energy is invisible, nonetheless a driving force in the entire universe. It is a fundamental input to any human activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref1">1</xref>]. Many types of energy exist; these include light energy, sound energy, solar energy, chemical energy and nuclear energy.</p><p>In the 19<sup>th</sup> century, the use of fossil fuels enhanced rapid industrialization and modern civilization. However, excessive exploitation of fossil fuels directly and indirectly assists in global warming and other encumbrances which drive our planet towards a dark future. Today, technological advancements have enabled the development of alternative and renewable energy sources, one of which is solar energy.</p><p>Solar energy is free, it does not create pollution, and has helped man become less dependent on other more costly and damaging forms of energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref2">2</xref>]. Actually, solar energy is the most abundant renewable energy resource available in most regions of the world, and has become increasingly attractive as a renewable energy source.</p><p>Generally, people understand real-world phenomena better when they are represented symbolically. As such, modelling should be used not only to illustrate and deepen understanding, but also to predict real-world phenomena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref3">3</xref>]. For instance, in the design and development of various solar energy systems, the estimation of solar radiation available is considered the most crucial issue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref4">4</xref>]. The importance of models for solar radiation prediction is further emphasized because, in most cases, the density and number of solar radiation measuring stations cannot describe the necessary variability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Most of the available models for predicting global solar radiation use some or even all of the following factors as input: sunshine data, solar declination, latitude, longitude, extraterrestrial radiation, relative humidity, soil temperature, temperature of the air, cloudiness, evaporation and precipitation among others. These factors require special skills and equipment to measure. In addition, models with multiple inputs have been shown to have insignificantly improved in accuracy compared with variants of the models in which fewer inputs are considered. Indeed, such variants are simpler to handle, not only in terms of computational convenience but also for ease of analysis, see Latunde et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to develop models, with few input factors that can be used to predict global solar radiation. The new models introduced in this study require little computational effort, and the only information needed to use them is the knowledge of the longitude and latitude, in addition to the season at the location of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Global Solar Radiation</title><p>Solar energy refers to sources of energy that can be directly attributed to the light of the sun or the heat that sunlight generates. It is also a fact that solar radiation is electromagnetic in nature. Global solar radiation, on the other hand, is the sum of the direct, diffuse and reflected solar radiations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref7">7</xref>]. Radiation data for solar electric (photovoltaic) systems are presented in kilowatt-hours per square meter (kWh/m<sup>2</sup>). Direct estimates of solar energy may be expressed as watts per square meter (W/m<sup>2</sup>) while those for heating systems are usually measured in British thermal units per square foot (Btu/ft<sup>2</sup>).</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Global Solar Radiation Models</title><p>Several models have been proposed for estimating daily or monthly global solar radiation using different techniques such as geostationary satellite images, neural networks, time series methods, physical radiative transfer models, and stochastic weather methods. These are generally based on different types of data including meteorological and geographical data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Meteorological data-based models depend on the most common meteorological elements including cloud cover, sunshine duration, temperature, and relative humidity, making them the most widely used models, especially the sunshine-based and temperature-based models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref9">9</xref>]. The primary sunshine-based model can be traced back to Angstrom model, using sunshine duration and clear sky radiation data to estimate global solar radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Many solar energy researchers have adopted Angstrom-Prescott-Page model as a baseline to further develop empirical models for predicting global solar radiation. One of these researchers is Falayi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref11">11</xref>] who developed a number of multilingual regression equations to predict the relationship between global solar radiation with one or more combinations of the following weather parameters: clearness index, mean daily temperature, ratio of maximum and minimum daily temperature, relative humidity, and relative sunshine duration for Iseyin, Nigeria. He observed that incorporating sunshine-based model, temperature-based model and relative humidity-based model yielded better precision than either sunshine-based model, temperature-based model, or relative humidity-based model. Akpabio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref12">12</xref>] obtained monthly mean daily basis model for the whole year, and for rainy and dry seasons for Onne, Nigeria. Others who considered the seasonal variation of monthly average daily global solar radiation in their models are Kolebaje and Mustapha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>In other locations in Africa, Soufi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref14">14</xref>] and Coulibaly &amp;Ouedraogo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref15">15</xref>], in separate independent studies, calibrated sunshine-based models and hybrid parameter-based models using extraterrestrial solar radiation, sunshine fraction, clearness index, maximum temperature and sine of solar declination for several cities in Algeria and Burkina Faso respectively, and observed that hybrid models performed better than sunshine-based models.</p><p>It is pertinent to note that majority of the variables involved in most of the studies listed above require special skills and equipment to measure, whereas there are other variables which can be simply determined in a definite manner, and whose attributes are directly observable. Two of such factors and which are proposed for use in this study, are geographical location and seasonal variation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Factors of Global Solar Radiation</title><p>Although the sun’s energy output is fairly constant, the total solar radiation falling on the surface of the earth varies and depends on a number of factors. According to Mittasova [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref16">16</xref>], the amount of global solar radiation available depends on factors like location, time of the year, and atmospheric conditions. As variation of solar radiation is the single most important factor affecting climate, seasonal variation of solar radiation is very important as well in estimating global solar radiation.</p><p>For this study, the geographical factors, latitude and longitude, are considered in modelling global solar radiation simply because every location on earth receives sunlight at least part of the year and the amount of solar radiation that reaches any spot on the earth’s surface basically varies according to the geographical location and season. Both latitude and longitude are the means by which the position of any place on the earth’s surface are determined and their attributes directly observed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Methodology</title><p>In this section, basic issues relating to the base and methodology of the study are considered. The domain for this application encompasses all the nations of the world, but the African continent has been selected for illustrating the methodology adopted.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. The African Continent</title><p>Geographically, Africa lies between latitudes 37˚N and 35˚S, and between longitudes 52˚E and 17˚W. The continent comprises of 54 independent countries. In assessing climate features of geographical locations and their seasons in this study, the African continent was subdivided into the five approved subregions, namely, North Africa, West Africa, Central Africa, East Africa and Southern Africa. These zones are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>North Africa is characterized by the Mediterranean climate at the coast and a large desert area in the south where temperatures are hottest. The seasons observed in the subregion are Spring (March-May), Summer (June-September), Autumn (October-November) and Winter (December-February) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>The West African subregion is influenced by the inter-tropical divergence. The rainy season in coastal areas is generally observed from the end of April to July with a second and shorter rainy season in September and October. Further inland, only one rainy season is observed from June to September.</p><p>Central Africa is one of the wettest parts of the continent. Three peak rainfall periods are experienced in the region, namely, March-May, July-September and October-December.</p><p>The climate in East Africa is typically equatorial with high temperatures year round and little seasonal variation especially close to the Equator. There are two short rainy seasons: one around April-June, and the other from October-December.</p><p>The Southern Africa subregion is mainly characterized by a wet and hot season from October to March (Summer), and a cool and dry season from April to September (Winter).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Methodology</title><p>There are largely two broad categories of techniques, with varying structures, available for developing mathematical models; these are the theoretical and empirical modelling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref19">19</xref>]. The theoretical approach is based on laws and regulations which have been verified, and such a model can be used to estimate real life scenarios with significant confidence.</p><p>The empirical technique, on the other hand, makes use of previous measurements that reveal relationships between the variables. Such relationships are to be utilized to make some predictions. Empirical modeling was, therefore, adopted for use in this study since the theoretical framework for forming some relationship between the factors is not available.</p><p>To generate the empirical data needed for this study, latitudes to the north of the Equator are regarded as positive while those to the south of the Equator are taken as negative. Similarly, longitudes to the east of the Greenwich Meridian are assigned positive values while negative values are attached to longitudes to the west of the Greenwich Meridian.</p><p>Interannual monthly average daily insolation for the period between 1996 and 2017 from the database of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) were obtained and processed to average global solar radiation, being guided by the information from the World Meteorological Organization on the climatic conditions and seasons, over the entire five subregions in Africa.</p><p>Locations were carefully selected within each of the subregions and the average global solar radiation were collated via the Power Data Access Viewer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref20">20</xref>]. The collated data are graphical represented in Figures 2-6.</p><p>The method of interpolation was adopted in developing global solar radiation models for any geographical location in the subregions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> describes the processes and tasks involved in obtaining the proposed models.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Empirical Models</title><p>In handling discrete data, with the intent of generating a predictive tool, it is customary to apply the concept of interpolation. Polynomials are commonly used for interpolation because they are easy to evaluate, differentiate and integrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref21">21</xref>].</p>Empirical Global Solar Radiation Models<p>The Wolfram mathematical software is a typical tool that is designed for constructing interpolants that are capable of evaluating a function and its derivatives at specific interpolation points [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref22">22</xref>]. With the data in Figures 2-6, the software was used to generate two-dimensional interpolating polynomials in variables x and y, where x and y respectively denote the latitude and longitude components of the location. Incorporating the different seasons into each subregion, the following empirical models were obtained.</p><p>North Africa:</p><p>R N 1 = 12.0388 + 0.12609 x − 0.0182203 x 2 + 0.000271859 x 3                   − 0.28832 y + 0.0141218 x y − 0.000153931 x 2 y − 0.000148864 y 2 R N 2 = 2.5493 + 0.509602 x − 0.0156812 x 2 + 0.000128806 x 3                   + 0.0604844 y − 0.0059339 x y + 0.00016503 x 2 y − 0.000774431 y 2</p><p>R N 3 = 11.1332 − 0.0107351 x − 0.0136715 x 2 + 0.00021861 x 3                   − 0.232581 y + 0.0127298 x y − 0.000167089 x 2 y − 0.000233522 y 2 R N 4 = 10.573 − 0.0702876 x − 0.00987517 x 2 + 0.000162251 x 3                   − 0.157611 y + 0.00880711 x y − 0.000120762 x 2 y − 0.000516666 y 2 (1)</p><p>where R<sub>N</sub><sub>1</sub>,R<sub>N</sub><sub>2</sub>,R<sub>N</sub><sub>3</sub>,R<sub>N</sub><sub>4</sub> denote the seasonal global radiation for the four seasons in North Africa, namely, Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter. The domain of each of the four models is</p><p>D N = { ( x , y ) : 5 ≤ x ≤ 40 , − 10 ≤ y ≤ 40 } .</p><p>West Africa:</p><p>R W 1 = 3.96376 + 0.0228769 x + 0.0158509 x 2 − 0.000421256 x 3                 + 0.00587765 y − 0.00199591 x y + 0.00015084 x 2 y − 0.00134874 y 2 R W 2 = 4.77514 + 0.0707062 x + 0.0057673 x 2 − 0.000265387 x 3                 + 0.00052142 y + 0.00487346 x y − 0.00021861 x 2 y − 0.000433544 y 2 (2)</p><p>where R<sub>W</sub><sub>1</sub> and R<sub>W</sub><sub>2</sub> denote the seasonal global radiation, for the two seasons in West Africa, in the domain D W = { ( x , y ) : 0 ≤ x ≤ 30 , − 20 ≤ y ≤ 20 } .</p><p>Central Africa:</p><p>R C 1 = 2.94796 − 0.0182047 x + 0.0158222 x 2 − 0.000301331 x 3                 + 0.144672 y + 0.00399308 x y − 0.000377977 x 2 y                 − 0.00260641 y 2 − 0.0000226986 x y 2</p><p>R C 2 = 3.84798 − 0.0645648 x + 0.0224157 x 2 − 0.000258392 x 3                 + 0.0771062 y + 0.0131217 x y − 0.00086798 x 2 y                 − 0.000516168 y 2 − 0.000325 x y 2 (3)</p><p>where R<sub>C</sub><sub>1</sub> and R<sub>C</sub><sub>2</sub> denote the seasonal global radiation for the two seasons in the domain</p><p>D C = { ( x , y ) : − 15 ≤ x ≤ 25 , 10 ≤ y ≤ 32 } .</p><p>East Africa:</p><p>R E 1 = − 2.88039 + 0.450858 x + 0.00583204 x 2 + 0.000164107 x 3                 + 0.622334 y − 0.0236714 x y − 0.0000878816 x 2 y                 − 0.0155337 y 2 + 0.000275662 x y 2 + 0.00013103 y 3 R E 2 = 1.27347 + 0.350915 x + 0.00404128 x 2 + 0.0000642684 x 3                 + 0.313112 y − 0.0183783 x y − 0.0000775406 x 2 y                 − 0.0074416 y 2 + 0.0002264 x y 2 + 0.0000622583 y 3 (4)</p><p>where R<sub>E</sub><sub>1</sub> and R<sub>E</sub><sub>2</sub> denote the seasonal global radiation in the valid domain</p><p>D E = { ( x , y ) : − 25 ≤ x ≤ 18 , 30 ≤ y ≤ 55 } .</p><p>Southern Africa:</p><p>R S 1 = 3.40494 − 0.0490626 x − 0.00285428 x 2 + 0.0000219348 x 3                 + 0.196849 y − 0.00132395 x y − 0.00491978 y 2 R S 2 = 25.7696 + 2.42097 x + 0.0954067 x 2 + 0.00122414 x 3                 + 0.0208147 y − 0.00461178 x y − 0.00414814 y 2 (5)</p><p>where R<sub>S</sub><sub>1</sub> and R<sub>S</sub><sub>2</sub> denote the seasonal global radiation for the two seasons in Southern Africa, together with their domain D W = { ( x , y ) : − 40 ≤ x ≤ − 18 , 10 ≤ y ≤ 35 } .</p><p>The generalized form of the models given by Equations (1)-(5) is</p><p>R G k = a + b x + c x 2 + d x 3 + e y + f x y + g x 2 y + h y 2 + i x y 2 + j y 3 (6)</p><p>where a , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j ∈ R , − 2.89 &lt; a &lt; 25.77 , − 0.08 &lt; b &lt; 2.43 , − 0.02 &lt; c &lt; 0.1 , − 0.0005 &lt; d &lt; 0.002 , − 0.29 &lt; e &lt; 0.7 , − 0.03 &lt; f &lt; 0.02 , − 0.0009 &lt; g &lt; 0.0002 , h ≤ 0 , − 0.0003 &lt; i &lt; 0.004 , j ≥ 0 ; G = N,W,C,E or S and k = 1,2,3 or 4.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Analysis of the Models</title><p>Contributions of location components x and y in determining the average seasonal global horizontal insolation in subregions of Africa as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> were obtained by adopting the following procedure:</p><p>Step 1: Divide each model R<sub>Gk</sub> through by its least coefficient.</p><p>Step 2: Using the domain of definition D<sub>G</sub>, neutralize x and subsequently y in R<sub>Gk</sub>.</p><p>Step 3: Determine the dominant location component and its percentage contribution.</p><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Prediction</title><p>Mathematical models (1)-(5) were also used to predict values of global solar radiation for the latitude and longitude coordinates of selected places in each subregion. The results for the predicted and actual values are as shown in Figures 8-12.</p><p>The coefficients of correlation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref23">23</xref>] between the predicted and actual values in Figures 8-12 are as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Result Comparison</title><p>The location-based models by Gopiathan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref24">24</xref>] and Glover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref25">25</xref>] together with Ansgtrom based one, by Rietveld [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref26">26</xref>], were compared at some selected locations and the result displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Contributions of variables in R<sub>Gk</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Region</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Domain D<sub>N</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Model</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >% contribution</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dominant component</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 ≤ x ≤ 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub>1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10 ≤ y ≤ 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub>2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub>3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub>4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >West Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 ≤ x ≤ 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−20 ≤ y ≤ 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RW2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Central Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15 ≤ x ≤ 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>C</sub>1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 ≤ y ≤ 32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>C</sub>2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−25 ≤ x ≤ 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>E</sub>1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 ≤ y ≤ 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>E</sub>2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Southern Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−40 ≤ x ≤−18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RS1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 ≤ y ≤ 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RS2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >x</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation coefficients between predicted and actual global solar radiations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Models</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation coefficient</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub><sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.954699</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub><sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.901375</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub><sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990823</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>N</sub><sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990259</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>W</sub><sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992251</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>W</sub><sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.948107</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>C</sub><sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991575</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>C</sub><sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996414</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>E</sub><sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.924941</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>E</sub><sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.911480</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>S</sub><sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.911290</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>S</sub><sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.900962</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion and Conclusion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Discussion</title><p>The resulting models for global solar radiation in the five subregions of Africa, as shown in Equations (1)-(5), indicate that each of the models is unique and in line with reality, since solar radiation is always available even during the harshest winter or most flooding rainy season.</p><p>An important aspect of empirical modelling is to build models that generalize well, and this is central to the success of a model to be fit for use as a predictor. This capacity has been demonstrated by means of the high level of predictability (with correlation coefficients not less than 0.9) achieved with the new models.</p><p>The factor analysis indicates that in determining the seasonal global solar radiation for Africa’s subregions, latitude played the major role with an overall contribution of 63.78%. The dominance of latitude as a component of the location factor buttresses some aspect of the information in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.106660-ref27">27</xref>]. This result implies that a simpler model depending only on latitude can be fashioned to measure seasonal variation of global solar radiation all the year round.</p><p>A comparison of the global solar radiations generated and graphically illustrated in Figures 8-12 indicate that the new empirical models made very reliable predictions as evidenced by the close agreement between the predicted and actual values of global solar radiation. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, the results compare favourably with those obtained using Gopinathan, Glover and Reitveld models. Rietveld method consistently produced the largest outputs while the outputs of the new models were consistently the least. This implies that the proposed method is the best of the four methods for estimating global solar radiation for intended practical purposes.</p><p>Another merit is that the domain of application, i.e. the subregions of the African continent, is the largest found in the literature.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Conclusions</title><p>The mean daily global solar radiation has been considered in this study as dependents of locational and seasonal factors while the data for the African continent were used for illustrating the methodology adopted. The new models obtained were presented in closed form for the five subregions of Africa.</p><p>The novelty in this paper is that accurate, reliable and computationally less burdensome empirical models with a few input factors were developed for use as predictive tools in estimating global solar radiation derivable for any location. This study also affirms the latitude as the dominant locational factor. In addition, the domain of application in the study is the largest so far.</p><p>Finally, the new models featured optimal performance in respect of estimating global solar radiation for any practical application.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bamigbola, O.M. and Atolagbe, S.E. (2021) Empirical Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation on the African Continent Based on Factors of Location and Season. Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 9, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2020.91004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.106660-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Energy Agency (2011) World Energy Outlook 2011. OECD Publishing, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, N.S., Crabtree, G., Nozik, A.J., Wasielewski, M.R., Alivisatos, P., Kung, H., Tsao, J., Chandler, E., Walukiewicz, W., Spitler, M., Ellingson, R., Overend, R., Mazer, J., Gress, M., Horwitz, J., Ashton, C., Herndon, B., Shapard, L. and Nault, R.M. (2005) Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy Utilization. Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Solar Energy Utilization, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2172/899136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">George, E.P. and Draper, N.R. (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley, Hoboken, 424</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schober, P., Boer, C. and Schwarte, L. (2018) Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia &amp; Anesthesia, 126, 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gopinathan, K.K. (1988) A General Formula for Computing the Coefficients of the Correlations Connecting Global Solar Radiation to Sunshine Duration. Solar Energy, 41, 499-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(88)90052-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glover, J. and McCulloch, S.G. (1958) The Empirical Relation between Solar Radiation and Hours of Sunshine. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 84, 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708436011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rietveld, M. (1978) A New Method for Estimating the Regression Coefficients in the Formula Relating Solar Radiation to Sunshine. Agricultural Meteorology, 19, 43-52.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(78)90014-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">https://sunmetrix.com/top-five-factors-determining-solar-energy-potential</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wolfram Research Inc. (2016) System Modeller, 11.0.1.0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wahab, M.A. (2017) Interpolation and Extrapolation. Warburgher: University of Pardeborn.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yates, T. (2017) Surface Solar Energy Resources and Meteorological Conditions, Solar and Terminological Data Sets from NASA Research for the Support of Renewable Energy, Building Energy and Agricultural Needs (Data Access Viewer, DAV). https://power.larc.nasa.gov</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flood, I. (2009) Empirical Modeling: Current and Emerging Techniques-Tutorial. Research Foundation Professor, Rinker School, College of design, Construction and Planning, University of Florida, Gainesville, 1-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Meteorological Organization (2015) The Climate in Africa: 2013, WMO Publication. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/wcdmp/documents/1147-EN.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-regions-of-Africa</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mittasova, H., Alvarez, J. and Allen, L. (2011) Estimating Monthly Solar Radiation in South Central Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 71, 601-609. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392011000400016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, O. and Ouedoraogo, A. (2016) Correlation of Global Solar Radiation of Eight Synoptic Stations in Burkina Faso Based on Linear and Multiple Linear Regression Methods. Journal of Solar Energy, 2016, Article ID: 7870907. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7870907</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soufi, A., Chermitti, A., Mostafa, B.M. and Zehor, A. (2014) Investigating the Performance of Chosen Models for the Estimation of Global Solar Radiation on the Horizontal Surface: A Case Study in Terny Hdiel, Tlemcen of Algeria. International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies, 7, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.073.07</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kolebaje, O.T. and Mustapha, L.O. (2012) On the Performance of Some Predictive Models for Global Solar Radiation Estimates in Tropical Stations: Port Harcourt and Lokoja. African Review of Physics, 7, 145-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akpabio, L.E., Udo, S.O. and Etuk, S.E. (2005) Modeling Global Solar Radiation for a Tropical Location: Onne, Nigeria. Turkish Journal of Physics, 29, 63-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Falayi, E.O., Adepitan, J.O. and Rabiu, A.B. (2008) Empirical Models for the Correlation of Global Solar Radiation with Meteorological Data for Iseyin, Nigeria. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 3, 210-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angstrom, A. (1924) Solar and Atmospheric Radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 50, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, Z., et al. (2014) Parametrization of Instantaneous Global Horizontal Irradiance: Clear Sky Component. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140, 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Connelly, J.N., Bizzarro, M., Krot, A.N., Nordlund, A., Wiedlandt, D. and Ivanova, M.A. (2012) The Absolute Chronology and Thermal Processing of Solid in the Solar Protoplanetary Disk. Science, 338, 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradford, T. (2006) Solar Revolution: The Economic Transformation of the Global Energy Industry. Global Environmental Politics, 7, 147-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Latunde, T., Bamigbola, O.M. and Aderinto, Y.O. (2016) Sensitivity of Parameters in an Optimal Control Model of the Electric Power Generating System. Ilorin Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 1, 54-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muneer, T. and Kambezidis, H. (1997) Solar Radiation and Daylight Models for the Energy Efficient Design of Buildings. Architectural Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.106660-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekici</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2019</year>)<article-title>Total Global Solar Radiation Estimation Models and Applications: A Review</article-title><source> International Journal Innovative Technology and Inter-Disciplinary Sciences</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 212</fpage>-<lpage>228</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>