Slow spinal compressions are defined as non-traumatic pathological processes which, through mechanical and/or vascular phenomena, lead to a progressive loss of spinal functions, the outcome of which is a flaccid paraplegia or tetraplegia [1] [2]. It is a diagnostic and therapeutic emergency [1] [3]. The clinical picture must be quickly recognized and investigated because the therapeutic sanction, often surgical, must be carried out as quickly as possible. The main challenge in this context is often to make the diagnosis as early as possible in order to limit the functional consequences of compression [1]. Today, MRI remains the benchmark examination for the emergency management of spinal cord compression syndrome. This MRI must be performed in an immediate emergency, as soon as the diagnosis is suspected from the clinic [3]. Management is urgent to promote recovery or avoid worsening. Depending on the etiology of the compression, it is proposed: surgery, medical treatment of infectious causes, or chemotherapy/radiotherapy for the tumor process inaccessible to surgery [1] [3] [4]. MRI has indisputably simplified the diagnostic and therapeutic process. Examination is performed without or combined with the injection of gadolinium. In fact, in a single exploration, it provides most of the information provided in stages by traditional methods: reference spinal cord deformation with respect to compression, alterations of the parenchyma in the form of abnormal spinal signals, direct visibility of the causal lesion and structuressatellites (cysts), LCS blockage, morphological and static abnormalities of the spine. Most of the time is sufficient to establish the surgical indication, MRI has supplanted here the other methods which owe their survival only to accessibility or deferred to MRI imaging [4]. A good knowledge of the spinal anatomy and functional neurological often makes it possible to orient the explorations and the topographic diagnosis [1].

No previous study had dealt with MRI aspects in Mali. We undertook this work with the aim of determining the place of MRI in the diagnosis of non-traumatic spinal cord compressions in the medical imaging department of the Mali hospital.

This was a descriptive retrospective study, carried out at the hospital’s medical imaging department from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 (02 years). Were included in our series; any patient, regardless of sex and age, with non-traumatic spinal cord compression, confirmed by MRI at Mali hospital and during the study period.

The variables studied were: socio-demographic data (age and sex), Neurological disorders (pain, sensory or motor disorders, sphincter disorder, and spinal cord compression syndrome). Spinal region (cervical, thoracic and lumbar). MRI aspect: sequences T1, T2, morphology, signal, enhancement after injection of gadolinium and the site. The MRI diagnostic hypothesis focused on lesions: tumoral, infectious and degenerative of the spine. The data was collected from the MRI registry, the examination report (s) and digital images in the database. Data analysis was done with SPSS 22.0 software. Procedure for the MRI examination: All the patients had benefited beforehand from a psychological preparation which consisted of explaining the purpose, the procedure of the examination and the search for contraindications. Before entering the MRI room, patients were cleared of any ferromagnetic objects that contraindicated the examination or that could generate artifacts. After they were installed on the examination table (in supine position, the volume type antenna was placed around the region of interest. We used the sequences: T1, T2, T2 sagittal STIR, and T2 axial. The latter was supplemented or not by sagittal sequences and a T1 in the plans with an intravenous injection of the gadolinium salt at a dose of 0.1 ml/kg. The thickness of the cuts was 05 mm every 05 mm [5].

The limitations of this study were:

· Retrospective study: Absence of old results of imaging and histology for operated patients.

· Absence of comparison of CT and MRI results for some patients as well as control MRIs

· Patients lost to follow-up.

At the end of this work, MRI showed good diagnostic sensitivity to the medullary both lesion and topography. This analysis was based on MRI semiology (morphological and signal).

At the end of our work, it appears that MRI is the imaging test that performs well in the study of the spine, particularly the spinal cord and its roots.

Socio-epidemiological data:

In 02 years, we had collected 179 cases of non-traumatic spinal cord compressions on 585 MRI of the spine, a frequency of 30.59%. This high frequency is explained by the fact that, the Mali Hospital was the only center in Mali with a functional MRI machine on the one hand and on the other hand, that it was also the site of reference in neurosurgery in Mali. The average age of our patients was 53.5 years. It is comparable to those of SARA [2] in Algeria (51 years old) and KASSEGNE [6] in TOGO (53 years old). It is higher than those of GANOUNI [7] in Morocco, BADJI N [8] (48 years old), and NIANG [9] (42.6 years old) in Senegal who returned to an average age between 48 and 42.6 years.

The male sex predominated in our series with a sex ratio of 3.7. This corroborates with other studies: SARA M. [2] in Algeria 3. KASSEGNE I. [6] in Togo, and DIOMANDE M [10] in Abidjan. However, BADJI N. [8] in Dakar was reported a female predominance (0.6). We did not find a scientific explanation for this male predominance.

Although pain is the first manifestation of spinal cord compression, motor disorders were the symptom that most motivated us to perform our MRI exams (41%). Root pain came in 2nd position (16.2%) [9].

Our study was carried out using a low-field MRI machine, while most of the similar studies were carried out on high-field machines [7] [8] [9] [11]. As a result, they were able to benefit from better spatial resolution. It had no impact on our MRI diagnosis

The sagittal (T1 and T2) and axial T2 sequences were performed systematically. This protocol is recommended by the literature [6] [8] [11] [12].

The intravenous injection of gadolinium salt was decided according to the result of the sequences not injected as recommended in the literature [5] [8] [12]. It is performed when a tumor or infectious process is discovered.

MRI with or without the injection of gadolinium salt is the first benchmark examination when spinal cord injury is clinically suspected. It allows the study of the spinal cord in the three planes of space and to appreciate the surrounding structures. It determines the lesion topography: extra medullary, intradural or intramedullary [12].

With regard to the spinal stages reached; the lesions were located at the levels: cervical (55.3%). thoracic (31.3%), lumbar (3.9%) and were multi-segmental (9.5%). Our data are different from those of BADJI [8] and DIOMANDE [10] who found in their series the back injuries in 42% and 56.1% respectively. For SARA [2], the lumbosacral segment was the most concerned (62%).

In our series, extradural lesions (79.3%) were dominated by degenerative processes and compressive herniated discs. Our data were consistent with certain data from the literature [1] [3]. On the other hand, the studies of BADJI [8], NIANG [9], BENOUNA [12] and MIREAU [1] were dominated by infectious processes.

Intramedullary localizations represented 16.2% of the cases which is close to the results of SARA [2], GANOUNI [7] and NASRI [11]. This could be explained by the limited number of MRI installations. So, it was not systematically requested in disco-vertebral infections. Intra dural and intramedullary lesions were the prerogative of tumor processes, which corroborated with the literature [2] [7] [8] [9].

1) Depending on the spinal segment: Table 5

Degenerative processes largely predominated on the cervical floor, superimposable on the BADJI series [8], Tumor pathologies predominated on the other two stages, which was superimposed on other similar studies [10] [13] [14].

2) Depending on the canal compartment: Table 6

Extradural etiologies were dominated by degenerative processes and herniated discs. They were different from those of GANOUNI [6], SARA [2] and BADJI [8], who found an infectious etiology. This could be explained by the fact that in our place of study MRI is not systematically indicated in the suspicions of disco-vertebral infectious pathologies. Spinal metastases came second in terms of frequency; which corroborated with the series of GANOUNI [6], BADJI [8], and BOUHAFA [15].

In the intramedullary and intradural compartments, the etiologies were dominated by tumor processes, as noted by GANOUNI [6], SARA [2], and BADJI [8].

Spinal cord compressions are a diagnostic and therapeutic emergency. The etiologies are very varied. MRI remains the benchmark examination for diagnosis. It makes it possible to analyze the anatomical elements, to specify, the site, the extent of the lesion and to provide elements of etiological orientation.

All the authors contributed to the conduct of this work. All authors also declare that they have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

For this work, we have received the patient's approval; that of the head of the service and the director of Mali Hospital.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Camara, M.A., N’Diaye, M., Coulibaly, M.B., Traore, M.M., Diarra, H., Toure, B.M., Nour, A.A., Coulibaly, S., Guindo, I., Ouologuem, M., Traore, S., Mariko, M., Kone, A.S., Konate, M. and Sidibe, S. (2020) MRI Contribution in the Diagnosis of Non-Traumatic Medular Compressions at the Mali Hospital of about 179 Cases. Open Journal of Medical Imaging, 10, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2020.104017

File number… Date of MRI: …../…../

CIVIL STATUS OF THE PATIENT

Q1. Age: \............../

Q2. Gender: \............../ 1) Male 2) Female.

Q3. Reason for examination\............../:

1) Spinal Claudication; 2) Radiculalgia;

3) Spinal syndrome; 4) Motor disorders;

5) Sensitive disorders; 6) Sphincteric disorders;

7) ROT troubles; 8) Radiculalgia and Motor Disorders;

9) Radiculalgia and sphincter disorders;

10) Compulsory spinal cord compression;

11) Motor and sphincter disorders;

12) Motor and sensory disturbances;

13) Motor, sensory and sphincter disorders

TECHNIQUES:

Q4. T1 \ .......... /: 1) Axial; 2) Coronal; 3) Sagittal

Q5. T2 \ ......... /: 1) Axial; 2) Coronal; 3) Sagittal

Q6. STIR \ ...... /: 1) Axial; 2) Coronal; 3) Sagittal

Q7. T1 Intra venousInjection de gadolinium \............../: 1) Yes; 2) No

IRM DATA:

Q8. Spinal segment \ ..... /:

1) Cervical; 2) Thoracic; 3) Lombar; 4) Multiple floors

Q9. Extent of the lesion \ ....... /:

1) A floor; 2) Two floors; 3) Three floors; 4) More than three floors

Q10. Number of lesions \ ...... /:

1) One lesion 2) Two lesions 3) Three lesions 4) More than three lesions

Q11. Type of lesion \ ...... /:

1) Tumor process 2) Generative process

3) Infectious process 4) Vascular process

Q12. Canal compartment \ ....... /:

1) Intramedullary 2) Intradural extramedullary 3) Extradural

Q13. Diagnostic hypotheses:

1) Astrocytoma; 2) Ependymoma;

3) Neuroma 4) Meningioma;

5) Hemangioblastoma 6) Arachnoid cyst

7) Tuberculous spondylodiscitis 8) Spondonodiscitis pyogenic;

9) Herniated disc 10) Primary tumor of the spine

11) Vertebral and epidural metastasis 12) Primary epidural abscess

13) Arthritis lesion

A) All the authors declare having read and give their consent for the publication.

B) Our article is original and has never been submitted or published in another newspaper.

C) Concerning names, emails and affiliations.