The energy demand has increased due to population growth. As a result, meeting energy requirements is a growing concern for governors. Under such circumstances, finding an alternative, clean, and low-cost source of energy is of the utmost importance. Limited reserves of fossil fuels, sustainability enhancement, diversification of energy supplies and environmental impacts of fossil fuels have led to increased utilization of renewable energies.

Moreover, the renewable technologies provide a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for fighting carbon pollution. Consequently, the significant advancement in the global clean energy sector stems from renewable energy sources and they are one of the fastest-growing industries [1]. Given the fact that global energy consumption has been growing rapidly, it is predicted that the electricity generated from renewable energy sources will surpass natural gases and nuclear power, and renewables will become dominant in energy production by the end of 2040. The strategic energy planning process is a framework that can be modified to meet each community’s need. World energy consumption is increasing substantially, according to International Energy Agency the world energy consumption in 2018 is 25,721 TWh where almost 60% of the produced energy around the world emits carbon dioxide (CO₂). We can calculate the contribution of the average citizen of each country by dividing its total emissions by its population. This gives us CO₂ emissions per capita [1].

Saudi Arabia has a growing economy. The energy consumption per capita is increased throughout the country with a substantial percentage. The reason of significant energy consumption is the decline in the exports of fossil fuels. The previous decade experienced much energy consumption equivalent to more than 500 million barrels of oil. It is expected that the total consumption of energy could be double in 2030. Evidently, as per given data of Saudi Electric Company, the total share of hydrocarbon i.e. oil is 63% and gas is 37%. The data further integrated and demonstrated that the in 2008 the total hydrocarbon consumption is 1766 TWh to fulfill the energy needs of different sectors. The growth of primary energy demand from 2004-2008 is 1366 TWh, and with the current consumption ratio in 2020 (2035 TWh), it will increase up to 2593 TWh in 2030. It will lead to further decline in the fossil fuel [2].

The world’s largest per capita CO₂ emitters are the major oil producing countries; this is particularly true for those with relatively low population size. Most are in the Middle East: In 2017 Qatar had the highest emissions at 49 tonnes (t) per person, followed by Trinidad and Tobago (30t); Kuwait (25t); United Arab Emirates (25t); Brunei (24t); Bahrain (23t) and Saudi Arabia (19t). Figure 1 shows carbon dioxide per person in year for Saudi Arabia. In the visualization we see the differences in per capita emissions across the world [3].

Various research work has been done on modeling hybrid systems that can generate much less emissions and can eventually replace the traditional way of producing electricity.

An off-grid solar-wind hybrid system is proposed for a university campus in Pakistan that will operate during power supply unavailability or shedding scenario. The University campus model has very low energy (COE) and Net Present

Cost (NPC) costs [4]. Hybrid energy system focused on PV-generator batteries for Aha Village, Morotai Island, North Maluku. Here, the authors considered two forms of loads for the village, i.e. communal and administrative. The results of the optimization show that both types of load can be easily satisfied by the proposed hybrid model [5]. Off-grid PV-wind battery hybrid system for three regions of Morocco that easily meets the load of those areas. The result also shows that the hybrid method can only be used if significant resources are available [6].

Study shows that among the cities considered in the study, Kish Island has mild and temperate climate, highest solar radiation and the lowest value for COE is the most economically and environmentally feasible city to meet the energy needs of all three types buildings. In addition to the substantial decrease in diesel fuel consumption, emission of CO₂, NPC and COE prices, this shows that renewable energy is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective than traditional energy sources [7].

Electricity generation capacity in 2018 reach 85.556 GW with 79 power plant of different producers, in between 2013-2018 around 49.4 GW have been added to the power system likely, due to increased consumption and higher energy demand in the kingdom. Based on International Energy Agency, Saudi Arabia generate electricity by using oil and gas on steam turbines (41%), gas turbines (41), diesel generator (1%) and combined cycle unite (17%) as it mentioned below (Figure 2).

Integration of power sources in power system has the upside of decreasing greenhouse gas emanation, henceforth helping with settling an unnatural global warming issue. It additionally helps decline our reliance on non-renewable energy source in power areas. Accordingly, renewable energy resources are viewed as a piece of the answer for alleviate ecological issues brought about by the utilization of traditional vitality assets. Right now, assets offer clean energy generations, permitting the charge of no-associated and remote zones, add to diminish reliance on non-renewable energy sources. They additionally have improved their innovations and diminished expenses. Nevertheless, the capital expense of sustainable force plant is exceptionally high contrasted with conventional power sources. However, the operating cost is less expensive than the one for conventional source and will keep on declining with modern technical improvement [8].

Since the greater part of sustainable resources are discontinuous in nature, it is invaluable to use more than one asset when accessible. Hybridizing of inexhaustible assets improves the energy system reliability, proficiency and economy, particularly in places with great attributes of sun and wind.

The geographic location of KSA is well placed for capitalizing solar energy with the average daily solar radiation level between 5.69 - 6.62 kWh/m² and 80% - 90% of clear sky days over the year as shown in Figure 3 [9] [10]. High availability of neutral sources like solar and wind guide the world trending to use renewable energy and identify valuable opportunities to further reduce future energy costs and CO₂. Hence, according to Vision 2030, Saudi Arabia aims to boost its renewable energy resources in its total energy share by producing nearly 9.5 GW of energy from sustainable energy sources by 2023, of which solar photovoltaic (PV) generation comprises a considerable portion [9].

In addition to the solar over the kingdom, It shows that minimum and maximum wind speed over the Saudi Arabia 6 m/s and 10 m/s repetitively as shown in Figure 4.

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is an Arab country and it is the largest nation in the Middle Orient and it is primarily situated in the southwest of the continent of Asia and forms the largest region of the Arab Peninsula with a latitude and length of approximately two million square km (23˚43'00''N 44˚07'00''E), respectively, and it has a diverse climate and a particular topographic character in this analysis. Riyadh city has been considered. The location Riyadh in Saudi Arabia is shown in Figure 5.

For optimal design and evaluation of the techno-economic feasibility of hybrid systems, HOMER software Pro 3.14.3 produced by NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA) has been employed. This software is a powerful tool for the optimum design, scale and planning of renewable hybrid energy systems through technical and economic analysis of off-grid and on-grid power systems. It requires inputs such as electrical or heating loads to simulate the system or hybrid part combinations based on various set-ups and generates optimized systems sorted in terms of COE and NPC methodology of optimization presented in Figure 14 [15]. Device architecture configurations are optimized by limiting the objective feature to the limitations. In this analysis, the objective function is COE which is the current device expense, except the amount of the revenue. Battery charging and unloading, power balance and other technological limitations are the limitations. By making energy balance for an hour, HOMER simulates the system configurations and takes the electric or thermal loads per hour that can be supplied to the system [14].

This study shows the effect on COE and NPC of renewable penetration and storage. As HOMER analyzes and optimizes the pre-feasibility of the micro-grid systems before implementation. Typically, three tasks can be done with HOMER: simulations, sensitivity analysis and the simulated machine optimization [13].

Loads, modules and grids are three primary types of equipment for hybrid renewable systems. The electric loads for this analysis include PV, generators, batteries and converters. Tables 2-5 define the characteristics of these components which are modeled on HOMER.

The optimization of the system has been done according to the leveled cost of energy (COE) concepts and compare to SEC tariff prices for residential consumers (two tariff has been considered for the electricity coming from the grid) The terms “Total NPC” and “Total NPC” for all schemes, including the initial capital cost final price of operating costs in addition to CO₂ emissions per system, for electricity tariff prices of US$ 0.08/kWh have been considered in Table 6 shows that the optimum configuration of the optimization of renewable energy was the lowest NPC and COE for PV-Grid system. The system does not need batteries due to the consumer’s load behavior. using batteries would increase the capital cost of the system and increasing COE as it mentioned in the second system in Table 6 and is not the highest prices due to the price of PV-Battery system would be also less than the price of electricity grid where the electricity of the grid coming in the third table where first tire 1 - 6000 kWh cost 0.048 $/kWh and second tariff is >6000 kWh cost 0.08 $/kWh.

Table 6, Table 7 shows the results of the simulations of the optimal systems for each case study and the economic assessments based on NPC and COE parameters. Sensitivity case studies in Saudi Arabia often take into account the current price of electricity in the residual categorization prices of $0.048/kWh and the potential projected prices of $0.08/kWh. Systems in various configurations are tested. PV-Grid 2. PV-Battery-Grid 3. Wind-Grid 4. Wind-Battery-Grid 5. PV- Wind-Grid 6. PV-Wind-Battery-Grid. In Table 7 for the Total NPC and Total NPC, plus the initial expense of the operating cost, for both systems. In addition to the emission of CO₂ per device, only the 0.048$/kWh tariff price of Table 7 is considered. Also, show optimum systems optimization. Table 7 shows that the use of renewables is not economical for a typical Riyadh user with an annual consumption of 15,000 kWh per year, because of a COE scheme than electricity for the grid. so, it is obvious the grid coming as the economic NPC and COE as it shows in Table 7.

The critical factors (for example, the size of the PV, converter and the number of wind turbines and batteries) that are required to provide the electricity demand are distinct from the environment parameters of a selected area at Riyadh, and they could have a profound effect on the cost of the system as well. It is primarily due to the fluctuation of the city’s primary parameters, such as solar radiation and wind speed, to determine the solar panel size and the amount of solar radiation power turbines used and the optimum application of the wind speed. Higher irradiation or wind speeds may result in the load needed without using grid electricity and reduce the electricity used by the grid.

As a conclusion, several changes in electricity prices in the Kingdom has been done and recently in 2018 was the last change in the electricity tariff in the Kingdom, especially for the residential sector which aims to make several reforms to the electricity sector in the Kingdom, implicitly in the goals of Vision 2030 for the Kingdom where the electricity tariff for the residential sector became for the first and second tiers (1 - 6000-kilowatt hours (kWh) and (6001-kilowatt-hours and higher) at a value of $0.048/kilowatt-hour and $0.08/kWh respectively, which ultimately aims to link electricity prices to global energy prices. The cost of electricity today in the Kingdom is considered a non-incentive for the acquisition of a renewable energy system, as the electricity tariff from the grid in Saudi Arabia is cheaper than its cost than the renewable energy systems. But in the event that electricity prices are raised in the Kingdom and it is expected that electricity prices in the Kingdom will rise to become similar to the prices of commercial categories in the next 10 years $0.08/kWh, it is possible that the renewable energy system is economical and the cost of electricity is cheaper than acquiring it from the grid to meet the needs of the residential consumer in the Kingdom. where it shows that PV-Grid system can provide electricity with a price of 0.075 $/kWh cheaper than electricity from the grid of 0.08 $ per each kWh.

1) The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Global Atlas at https://globalsolaratlas.info/map, reference number [10].

2) The data that support the findings of this study are available from [K.A.CARE. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with the permission of K.A.CARE [11].

3) The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in EIA at https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=74&t=11, reference number [16].

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Alturki, F.A. and Dayil, A.B. (2020) Techno-Economic Evaluation and Optimization of Grid Connected PV and Wind Generating System for Riyadh City. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 8, 46-63. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2020.812004