<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJNeph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Nephrology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2842</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojneph.2020.104039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJNeph-105992</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Preliminary Study on Renal Ultrasound Biometry in Apparently Healthy 18 to 30-Year-Old Subjects with Normal Renal Function in Ouagadougou
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gérard</surname><given-names>Coulibaly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boubakar</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gloria</surname><given-names>D. M. H. Capo-Chichi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tiéba</surname><given-names>Millogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aïda</surname><given-names>H. Y. Lengani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aoua</surname><given-names>Semde</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gaoussou</surname><given-names>Sanou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amidou</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Balkissa</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ousséini</surname><given-names>Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Nephrology-Dialysis Department of Sour&amp;amp;ocirc; Sanou University Hospital Center of Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Health Sciences Research Institute, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Omaha, Nebraska, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Imaging Department of Yalgado Ouedraogo University Hospital Center of Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Nephrology and Haemodialysis Department of Yalgado Ouedraogo University Hospital Center of Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>388</fpage><lpage>402</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: In our practice, renal measurements in patients with normal renal function usually appear to be lower compared to standards reported in reference literature. The standards are probably different in our context. Given the importance of renal biometrics in nephrological practice, we felt it necessary to carry out this preliminary study in order to identify an order of reference measurements appropriate to our context. 
  Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that took place from 18 August to 04 November 2018 at the Yalgado Ouedrarogo University Hospital Center. The first 100 subjects aged between 18 and 30 years who met the following inclusion criteria were selected: to be black african Burkinabe and to have normal renal function. The height, width and thickness of each kidney were measured using ultra-sound scanners. For statistical tests, a value of p &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 
  Results: The average age was 23.9 &#177; 6.1 years and the sex ratio was 2.2. Mean heights, widths and renal thicknesses were 94.5 &#177; 14.5, 38.7 &#177; 10.7 and 36.3 &#177; 10.3 mm, and 96.7 &#177; 16.7, 42.7 &#177; 16.7 and 36.8 &#177; 10.8 mm respectively for right and left kidneys. The distribution of the different renal dimensions in our sample followed a normal distribution. In the particular case of the right kidney, the probability that its height was between 79.2 and 109.7 mm was 0.95 and the probability that it was less than 79.2 mm or greater than 109.7 mm was 0.05. Renal height was significantly higher in subjects with height greater than 1.70 m (p ≤ 0.02). The left kidneys were on average significantly larger than the right kidneys (p = 0.0001). 
  Conclusions: Our study is not extrapolable to the general population of Burkina Faso. It suggests, however, that the kidneys of the apparently healthy Burkinabe subject are smaller than what is reported in anatomy reference books. Our work, which is preliminary, should be deepened through a national survey. In the meantime, we should consider, in the nephrological assessment of the Burkinabe patient, the results of the renal biometrics we report.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Black African</kwd><kwd> Burkina Faso</kwd><kwd> Renal Biometrics</kwd><kwd> Ultrasounds Scanner</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ultrasonography is an imaging technique that relies on the use of ultrasound. Because of its safety and accessibility, it is the first-line for the exploration of renal parenchyma and vessels. It allows, in association with the laboratory tests, the early diagnosis of renal disease expressed by a morphological and/or structural abnormality of the kidneys.</p><p>The knowledge of renal biometry provides essential morphometric parameters. It reports changes in kidney size during renal disease helping doctors to make a diagnostic and therapeutic decision. This assumes a prior knowledge of normal kidney size. While studies have been done in western countries to evaluate normal kidney biometrics, estimating the height at 120 mm, the width at 60 mm, and the thickness at 30 mm; only a few studies in black Africa were devoted to this question [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref1">1</xref>]. As a Consequence, African healthcare centers are using western countries reference ranges, which are not always adapted to Black African. Indeed, the kidney size varies from one population to another, also depend on age, weight, height, sex, and origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref2">2</xref>]. A study done among adults in Benin, found the kidney size to be well below western countries numbers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref3">3</xref>]. However, can these results be generalized to other black African populations?</p><p>In our practice, renal measurements in patients with normal kidney function usually appear to be lower compared to normal values reported in literature. The normal values are probably different in our context. Given the importance of renal biometrics in nephrology, we deemed necessary to carry out this preliminary study to identify normal reference values appropriated to our context.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We conducted a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study between August 18 and November 04, 2018 in the imaging department of the Yalgado Ouedraogo University Hospital Center (CHU-YO).</p><p>The study population included students and individual accompanying patients aged 18 to 30 years. We chose a convenience sample. The selection of subjects was done using brochures in CHU-YO, and The Universities Ouaga I Pr Joseph KI-ZERBO and Saint Thomas Aquin. Empirically, the first 100 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were selected.</p><p>The inclusion criteria were:</p><p>- be black and have at least a parent and grandparent Burkinabe.</p><p>- age between 18 and 30 years.</p><p>- be apparently in good health:</p><p>• no past medical history of acute or chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure, clinically detectable heart or liver failure, diabetes mellitus, edema, hematuria, pyuria;</p><p>• normal urine dipstick test for albumin, red blood cells, leukocytes, glucose, urinary density, nitrite;</p><p>• a normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimated by the the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD);</p><p>• even and symmetrical kidneys, with normal echogenicity and without structural abnormalities.</p><p>We did not include pregnant women in the study.</p><p>The data were collected using a standardized questionnaire, completed by the same interviewer at each interview with the subjects. The studied variables were renal biometrics, and socio-demographic, clinical and biological data (plasma urea, creatinine). A leaflet explaining the objectives of the study was given to the participants. For those who could not read, it was described to them in the language of their choice.</p><p>The data were collected anonymously. The obtained results were only shared with the subjects who wanted it. The brand of the ultrasound machine used was Toshiba™ or General Electric™. Each of the two reference radiologists weres performed at least two measurements per patient. The average of these measurements (expressed in millimeters) for each subject was used.</p><p>The length was measured on a longitudinal section through the long axis between the two poles. The width measurement was made on a cross-section, corresponding to the distance between the hilum and the lateral edge. The thickness was measured on a transverse section through the hilum between the anterior and posterior surfaces and perpendicular to the width.</p><p>In order to be operational, renal ultrasound biometrics were defined by the method of ultrasound measurement using the two conventional slices (longitudinal and transverse) to establish limits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref3">3</xref>]. Classically, the normal size of the kidneys is 120 mm for the height, 60 mm for the width and 30 mm for the thickness. Renal hypotrophy is described when the height is less than 90 mm, the width less than 40 mm and the thickness less than 30 mm. Renal hypertrophy is defined by a height greater than 120 mm.</p><p>This study has been approved by the management of the university hospital center Yalgado Ou&#233;draogo of Ouagadougou, in the absence of an institutional ethics committee. An information leaflet detailing the objectives has been proposed to the identified persons. For those who could not read, the instructions were clearly explained in the dialect of their choice. It was only after this stage that verbal consent was requested and acquired from study participants. We did not observe any cases of refusal to participate. The data was collected under the guise of anonymity and confidentiality. The results of the complementary examinations were immediately communicated and explained to the participants.</p><p>Data entry and analysis was done on a micro-computer with Epi-Info software. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean &#177; standard deviation and qualitative variables as numbers and percentages. The chi-square test was used to compare the qualitative variables for total numbers ≥ 5. For total numbers &lt; 5, we used Fisher’s exact test. The Student’s t-test was used to compare the means. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The study concerned 100 individuals. The sex ratio was 2.2 and the average age of the patients was 23.9 &#177; 6.1 years. The overall mean serum creatinine was 110.7 &#177; 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. The general complete data of patientsis shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Renal Measurements by Ultrasound</title><p>Kidney measurements on ultrasound showed an average height of 94.5 &#177; 14.5 and 96.7 &#177; 16.7 mm for respectively the right and left kidneys. The synthesis of renal measurements on ultrasound is reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Distribution of Renal Heights</title><p>The distribution of renal heights in our sample followed a normal distribution. Thus, the probability that the height of the right kidney be between 79.2 and 109.7 mm was 0.95 and the probability that the height of the right kidney be less than 79.2 mm or greater than 109.7 mm was 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The probability that the height of a left kidney be between 81.5 and 111.8 mm was 0.95 and the probability that the height of a left kidney be less than 81.5 mm or greater than 111.8 mm was 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Factors Associated with Kidney Height Socio-Demographic Factors</title><p>The socio-demographic factor significantly associated with renal height was the sex (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Thus, the renal height was significantly higher in male.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Lifestyle</title><p>In our study, there was no significant association between lifestyle and renal</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory data of 10,018 to 30-year-old subjects with normal renal function in Ouagadougou</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sex ratio: 2.2 Mean age: 23.9 &#177; 6.1 years Residence Ouagadougou n (%): 95 (95) Other residence n (%): 5 (5) Profession Student n (%): 65 (65) Pupil n (%): 19 (19) Official n (%): 16 (16) Lifestyle Tobacco* n (%): 14 (14) Alcohol** n (%): 36 (36) Sedentary n (%): 32 (32) Weight in kg m &#177; SD: 68.1 &#177; 24.9 m &#177; SD men: 69.8 &#177; 23.2 m &#177; SD women: 64.3 &#177; 24.7 Height in cm m &#177; SD: 173.1 &#177; 21.9 m &#177; SD men: 176.1 &#177; 18.9 m &#177; SD women: 166.4 &#177; 14.6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Body mass index in kg/m<sup>2</sup> m &#177; SD overall: 22.6 &#177; 8.7 m &#177; SD men: 22.4 &#177; 6.9 m &#177; SD women: 23.2 &#177; 8.0 SBP in mmHg m &#177; overall SD: 117.3 &#177; 5.1 m &#177; SD men: 118.0 &#177; 7.2 m &#177; SD women: 115.8 &#177; 3.5 DBP in mm Hg m &#177; SD overall: 74.6 &#177; 1.9 m &#177; SD men: 76.2 &#177; 2.2 m &#177; SD women: 71.0 &#177; 3.3 Creatininemia in μmol/L m&#177; overall SD: 82.6 &#177; 2.5 m &#177; SD men: 86.3 &#177; 12.5 m &#177; SD women: 74.3 &#177; 9.9 GFR (MDRD) in mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> m &#177; SD: 110.7 &#177; 9.5 m &#177; SD men: 124.3 &#177; 5.9 m &#177; SD women: 109.4 &#177; 10.4</th></tr></thead></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*: 3.5 packs-year on average. **: occasional consumption. DBP: diastolic blood pressure. GFR: glomerular filtration rate. m &#177; SD: mean &#177; standard deviation. MDRD: modification of diet in renal disease. SBP: systolic blood pressure.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Height, width and thickness of right and left kidneys of 100 18 to 30-year-old subjects with normal renal function in Ouagadougou</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Right Kidney</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Left Kidney</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm &lt;90 mm n (%) ≥90 mm n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.5 &#177; 14.5 27 (27) 73 (73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.7 &#177; 16.7 18 (18) 82 (82)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width m &#177; SD (extreme) in mm &lt;40 mm n (%) ≥40 mm n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.7 &#177; 10.7 55 (55) 45 (45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.7 &#177; 16.7 26 (26) 74 (74)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness m &#177; SD (extreme) in mm &lt;30 mm n (%) ≥30 mm n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.3 &#177; 10.3 4 (4) 96 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.8 &#177; 10.8 6 (6) 94 (94)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>m &#177; SD: mean &#177; standard deviation.</p><p>height (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Anthropometric Data</title><p>In our study, the average kidney height for subjects less than 1.70 m and those</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Association between renal height and socio-demographic factors of 18 to 30-year-old subjects with normal renal function in Ouagadougou</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Right kidney</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Left kidney</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Man</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 &#177; 14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.8 &#177; 13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.6 &#177; 11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.7 &#177; 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.6 &#177; 6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.0 &#177; 10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[20 - 25]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.6 &#177; 14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.3 &#177; 17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[25 - 30]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.0 &#177; 14.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5 &#177; 12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.0 &#177; 2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0 &#177; 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ouagadougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 &#177; 14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.7 &#177; 16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outside of ouagadougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.4 &#177; 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.8 &#177; 11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.7 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 &#177; 4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pupil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.1 &#177; 3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Official</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94 &#177; 5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>m &#177; SD: mean &#177; standard deviation. NS: not significant.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Association between kidney height, antecedents, and lifestyle of 18 to 30-year-old subjects with normal renal function in Ouagadougou</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Right kidney</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Left kidney</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smoker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.3 &#177; 8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.5 &#177; 15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.4 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5 &#177; 16. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chew Tobacco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.7 &#177; 9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.3 &#177; 14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5 &#177; 16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alcohol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.5 &#177; 11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.3 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5 &#177; 16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sedentary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.4 &#177; 13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.3 &#177; 9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.7 &#177; 14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.7 &#177; 16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>m &#177; SD: mean &#177; standard deviation. NS: not significant.</p><p>with a size greater than or equal to 1.70 m was respectively 91.4 &#177; 11.6 and 95.4 &#177; 15.5 mm for the right kidney and 92.9. &#177; 13.1 and 97.8 &#177; 15 mm for the left kidney. The kidney was significantly higher in height for subjects greater than or equal to 1.70 m both on the right (p = 0.002) and on the left (p = 0.005) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Likewise, the height of the kidney of subjects with a BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was greater than that of subjects with a BMI less than 25 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Laboratory Factors</title><p>In subjects with serum creatinine less than 70 &#181;mol/L had an average height of</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Association between kidney height and anthropometric data of 18 to 30-year-old subjects with normal renal function in Ouagadougou</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Right kidney</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Left kidney</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height m &#177; SD in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1.70 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.4 &#177; 11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9 &#177; 13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥1.70 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.4 &#177; 15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.8 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;60 kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.2 &#177; 11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8 &#177; 13.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[60 - 80] kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 &#177; 14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.1 &#177; 14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥80 kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5 &#177; 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.8 &#177; 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Body mass index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;25 kg/m&#178;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.2 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.1 &#177; 16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥25 kg/m&#178;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.5 &#177; 8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.1 &#177; 10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>m &#177; SD: mean &#177; standard deviation. NS: not significant.</p><p>the right and left kidneys of 97 &#177; 8 and 98.7 &#177; 11.7 mm, respectively. For subjects with serum creatinine greater than or equal to 70 &#181;mol/L, the mean kidney height was 94.3 &#177; 14.3 and 96.6 &#177; 13.6 mm, respectively. The differences observed were not significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Comparison of Renal Size Means</title><p>In average, the right kidney had a height of 94.5 &#177; 14.5 mm, a width of 38.7 &#177; 10.7 mm and a thickness of 36.3 &#177; 10.3 mm. Compared to the right kidney, the average size of which was 96.7 &#177; 16.7, 42.7 &#177; 16.7 and 36.8 &#177; 10.8 mm respectively for heigth, width and thickness, the left kidney was larger (p = 0.0001 for the three types of measurements).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>We used ultrasound for the kidneys measurements. This ultrasound technique has the advantage of being safe and financially accessible. It is a first-line imaging. When performed by an experienced operator, the ultrasound provides exciting results. However, CT scan is more accurate and easier to reproduce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref4">4</xref>] but it is much more expensive. Our choice to use two ultrasound operators helps improve the accuracy.</p><p>We reported mean height of 94.5 &#177; 14.5 mm for the right kidney and 96.7 &#177; 16.7 mm for the left kidney, and even kidneys with 80 mm of height were compatible with normal kidney function. These sizes are smaller than the 120 mm appearing in classic anatomy books [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref1">1</xref>] described in Caucasian. Other African authors report means that, although slightly higher than ours, are well below 120 mm. Indeed, Ramilitiana et al. in Madagascar, Agboton et al. in Benin and Okoye et al. in Nigeria noted the mean of the height for the right and left kidney between 98 to 106 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref6">6</xref>]. In Mexico, Oyuela-Carrasco et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref7">7</xref>] found a mean of 104.3 &#177; 6.5 mm for the right kidney and 105.8 &#177; 7.5 mm for the left kidney. In our study as well as in others, the right kidney was lower than the left, certainly because of the presence of the liver above the right kidney.</p><p>We did not find any significant association between kidney height and age, certainly due to the age homogeneity of our sample. We should know that the height varies depending on age. This has been well demonstrated in the study of Buchholz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref2">2</xref>] based on a population aged between 13 and 80 years. Thus, in their sample, the size of the kidney increased until the 3rd decade, remained stable throughout the middle age and then decreased. Like most studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref8">8</xref>], we confirmed that male had a higher kidney size than female. The influence of the male sex hormones lead in general to a higher weight and height in man compared to woman. It is known the height of the kidney is proportional to these two anthropometric parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105992-ref10">10</xref>]. Our study has moreover confirmed this association between these parameters and the renal height.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limits of the Study</title><p>The results of our study could not be generalized to the national level because of our convenience sampling. Also, normal kidney function was determined by the estimation of GFR by the MDRD formula. Although this method is well-appropriated for the weights and ages in our study, the accurate measurement of the GFR with a standard method (however costly) would have given us the preliminary study, with exciting results th certainty. Despite these limitations, we have reached to the end of this at can serve as a basis for practitioners in our country.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Although our study cannot be generalized to the population of our country, suggests that the kidneys of the healthy Burkinabe are smaller than what is reported in anatomy books. Our study, which is preliminary, should be deepened through a national study. If this study confirms the present results, some questions may be asked. Indeed, if the GFR is proportional to a healthy kidney size, we can wonder if the Black Burkinabe (African by extension) does not have a lower GFR at birth. Could this contribute to a faster progression of chronic renal failure in such a population? Moreover, we should consider, in the nephrology assessment of Burkinabe patient, the results of the renal biometry that we report.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors do not declare any conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Coulibaly, G., Ouattara, B., Capo-Chichi, G.D.M.H., Millogo, T., Lengani, A.H.Y., Semde, A., Sanou, G., Sawadogo, A., Ouattara, B. and Diallo, O. (2020) Preliminary Study on Renal Ultrasound Biometry in Apparently Healthy 18 to 30-Year-Old Subjects with Normal Renal Function in Ouagadougou. Open Journal of Nephrology, 10, 388-402. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojneph.2020.104039</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Appendix</title><p>FICHE DE COLLECTE</p><p>I/IDENTITE</p><p>- Num&#233;ro d’identification: ……………</p><p>- Age: ………</p><p>- Sexe: M /_/, F /_/</p><p>- Lieu de r&#233;sidence: …………………………</p><p>- Profession: ………………………………...</p><p>- Ville: ………………………………………</p><p>- Contact: ……………………………………</p><p>II/ ANTECEDENTS</p><p>➢ Personnels:</p><p>- Terme &#224; la naissance: …………</p><p>- G&#233;mellit&#233;: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Complications &#224; l’accouchement: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui pr&#233;ciser………)</p><p>- H&#233;maturie: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Pyurie: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Œd&#232;me de type r&#233;nal: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Br&#251;lures mictionnelles: Oui /_/ Non/_ /</p><p>- Infections ORL: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- HTA: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui date de d&#233;but……….)</p><p>- Maladie r&#233;nale: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui date de d&#233;but……….)</p><p>- Diab&#232;te: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui date de d&#233;but……)</p><p>- H&#233;moglobinopathie: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui date de d&#233;but……….)</p><p>- Cardiopathie: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui date de d&#233;but……….)</p><p>➢ Familiaux:</p><p>- HTA: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Diab&#232;te: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui quel type………….)</p><p>- Cardiopathie: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Maladie r&#233;nale: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Autres: …………………………</p><p>➢ Mode de vie:</p><p>- Tabac fum&#233;: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui combien de paquets ann&#233;es……….)</p><p>- Tabac chiqu&#233;: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>- Alcool: Oui /_/ Non /_/ (si oui quelle quantit&#233;………..)</p><p>- S&#233;dentarit&#233;: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>➢ Autres Ant&#233;c&#233;dents: ………………………………………………….</p><p>III/DONNEES CLINIQUES</p><p>- Etat g&#233;n&#233;ral selon OMS: /_/</p><p>&#183; Capable d’une activit&#233; identique &#224; celle pr&#233;c&#233;dent la maladie, sans aucune restriction: 0.</p><p>&#183; Activit&#233; physique diminu&#233;e mais ambulatoire et capable de mener un travail: 1.</p><p>&#183; Ambulatoire et capable de prendre soin de soi, incapable de travailler. Alit&#233; moins de 50% de son temps: 2.</p><p>&#183; Capables de seulement quelques soins personnels. Alit&#233; ou en chaise plus de 50% du temps: 3.</p><p>&#183; Incapable de prendre soin de lui-m&#234;me, alit&#233; ou en chaise en permanence: 4.</p><p>- Taille: ……………</p><p>- Poids: ……………….</p><p>- Indice de masse corporelle: ……………</p><p>- Bruits du cœur: …………………</p><p>- Pression art&#233;rielle: ………………</p><p>- Les mensurations du foie: ….............</p><p>IV/DONNEES BIOLOGIQUES</p><p>- la cr&#233;atinin&#233;mie: ………….</p><p>- le d&#233;bit de filtration glom&#233;rulaire selon MDRD: ……………..</p><p>V/BIOMETRIE RENALE</p><p>REIN DROIT:</p><p>- Hauteur: …………</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 120</p><p>2 = (normale) 85 - 120</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 85</p><p>- Largeur: ………….</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 60</p><p>2 = (normale) 35 - 60</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 35</p><p>- Epaisseur: ……….</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 52</p><p>2 = (normale) 28 - 52</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 28</p><p>- Bonne diff&#233;renciation cortico-m&#233;dullaire: Oui /_/, Non /_/</p><p>REIN GAUCHE:</p><p>- Hauteur: …………</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 120</p><p>2 = (normale) 85 - 120</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 85</p><p>- Largeur: ………….</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 60</p><p>2 = (normale) 35 - 60</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 35</p><p>- Epaisseur: ……….</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 52</p><p>2 = (normale) 28 - 52</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 28</p><p>- Diam&#232;tre: ……….</p><p>1 = (augment&#233;e) &gt; 77</p><p>2 = (normale) 49 - 77</p><p>3 = (diminu&#233;e) &lt; 49</p><p>- Bonne diff&#233;renciation cortico-m&#233;dullaire: Oui /_/, Non /_/</p><p>Sym&#233;trie de la taille des reins: Oui /_/ Non /_/</p><p>COLLECTION SHEET</p><p>I/IDENTITY</p><p>- ID number: ……………</p><p>- Age: ………</p><p>- Sex: M / _ /, F / _ /</p><p>- Place of residence: …………………………</p><p>- Profession: ………………………………...</p><p>- City: ………………………………………</p><p>- Contact: ……………………………………</p><p>II/BACKGROUND</p><p>Personal:</p><p>- Term at birth: …………</p><p>- Twinning: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Complications during childbirth: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes specify ………)</p><p>- Hematuria: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Pyuria: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Edema of renal type: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Micturition burns: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- ENT infections: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- HBP: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes start date ……….)</p><p>- Renal disease: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes start date ……….)</p><p>- Diabetes: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes start date ……)</p><p>- Hemoglobinopathy: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes start date ……….)</p><p>- Cardiopathy: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes start date ……….)</p><p>Family:</p><p>- HBP: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Diabetes: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes which type ………….)</p><p>- Cardiopathy: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Renal disease: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Other: …………………………</p><p>Lifestyle:</p><p>- Smoked tobacco: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes how many packages years ……….)</p><p>- Chewed tobacco: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>- Alcohol: Yes / _ / No / _ / (if yes what quantity ……… ..)</p><p>- Sedentary lifestyle: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>Other History: ………………………………………………….</p><p>III/CLINICAL DATA</p><p>- General condition according to WHO: / _ /</p><p>&#183; Capable of an activity identical to that preceding the disease, without any restriction: 0.</p><p>&#183; Reduced but ambulatory physical activity capable of carrying out work: 1</p><p>&#183; Ambulatory and able to take care of oneself, unable to work. Bedridden less than 50% of his/her time: 2.</p><p>&#183; Capable of only some personal care. In bed or in a chair more than 50% of the time: 3.</p><p>&#183; Unable to take care of himself, bedridden or in a chair permanently: 4.</p><p>- Cut: ……………</p><p>- Weight: ……………….</p><p>- Body mass index: ……………</p><p>- Noise of the heart: …………………</p><p>- Arterial pressure: ………………</p><p>- The liver measurements: ….............</p><p>IV/BIOLOGICAL DATA</p><p>- creatinine level: ………….</p><p>- the glomerular filtration rate according to MDRD: ……………..</p><p>V/RENAL BIOMETRY</p><p>RIGHT KIDNEY:</p><p>- Height: …………</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 120</p><p>2 = (normal) 85 - 120</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 85</p><p>- Width: ………….</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 60</p><p>2 = (normal) 35 - 60</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 35</p><p>- Thickness: ……….</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 52</p><p>2 = (normal) 28 - 52</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 28</p><p>- Good cortico-medullary differentiation: Yes / _ /, No / _ /</p><p>LEFT KIDNEY:</p><p>- Height: …………</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 120</p><p>2 = (normal) 85 - 120</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 85</p><p>- Width: ………….</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 60</p><p>2 = (normal) 35 - 60</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 35</p><p>- Thickness: ……….</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 52</p><p>2 = (normal) 28 - 52</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 28</p><p>- Diameter: ……….</p><p>1 = (increased) &gt; 77</p><p>2 = (normal) 49 - 77</p><p>3 = (decreased) &lt; 49</p><p>- Good cortico-medullary differentiation: Yes / _ /, No / _ /</p><p>Symmetry of kidney size: Yes / _ / No / _ /</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.105992-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rouvi&amp;egrave;re, H. and Delmas, A. (2002) Anatomie Humaine: Descriptive, topographique et fonctionnelle. 15&amp;egrave;me &amp;eacute;dition, Masson, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buchholz, N.P., Abbas, F., Biyabani, S.R., Afzal, M., Javed, Q., Rivzi, I., et al. (2000) Ultrasonographic Renal Size in Individuals without Known Renal Disease. Journal Of Pakistan Medical Association, 50, 12-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agboton, B.L., Yepke, P., Vigan, J., Gandji, S., Klaissa, E., Aguemon, B., et al. (2015) Biom&amp;eacute;trie r&amp;eacute;nale des adultes b&amp;eacute;ninois apparemment sains compar&amp;eacute;e &amp;agrave; celle des h&amp;eacute;modialys&amp;eacute;s. West African Journal of Research for Health, 4, 25-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nahum, H., Frijo, G., Grenier, P., Lewin Zeitoun, M. and Vignaux, O. (2014) Trait&amp;eacute; d’imagerie m&amp;eacute;dicale. 2&amp;egrave; &amp;eacute;dition, Lavoisier, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyuela-Carrasco, J., Rodriguez-Castellanos, F., Kimura, E., Delgado-Hernandez, R.E. and Herrera-Felix, J.P. (2009) Renal Length Measured by Ultrasound in Adult. Mexican Population Nefrologia, 29, 30-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okoye, I.J., Agwu, K.K. and Idigo, F.U. (2005) Normal Sonographic Renal Length in Adult Southeast Nigerian. African Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 34, 129-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramilitiana, B., Dodo, M., Rakotoarimanga, H.N., Randriamboavonjy, R.L. and Randriamarotia, W.F. (2016) Dimensions r&amp;eacute;nales en service de N&amp;eacute;phrologie clinique. The Pan African Medical Journal, 24, Article No. 117. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.24.117.9411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glodny, B., Unterholzer, V., Taferner, B., Hofmann, K.J., Rehder, P., Strasak, A., et al. (2009) Normal Kidney Size and Its Influencing Factors—A 64 Slice MDCT Study of 1040 Asymptomatic Patients. BMC Urology, 9, Article No. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-9-19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moulion Tapouh, J.R., Moifo, B., Kaze, F.F.J., Kandjan Dayo, A.E., Tagni, Z.D. and Gonsu, F.J. (2016) Biom&amp;eacute;trie r&amp;eacute;nale normale au scanner dans un groupe d’adultes camerounais &amp;agrave; Yaound&amp;eacute;. JAIM, 8, 141-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.105992-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeed, Z., Miza, W., Sayani, R., Sheikh, A., Yazdani, I. and Hussain, S.A. (2012) Sonographic Measurement of Renal Dimensions in Adults and Its Correlates. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine and Public Health, 4, 1626-1641.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>