<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2020.1112076</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-105968</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
          <subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>


          Physiochemical, Nutritional and Technological Properties of Instant Porridge Supplemented with Mung Bean

        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Saad</surname>
            <given-names>A. Mahgoub</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Amera</surname>
            <given-names>T. Mohammed</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
            <sup>*</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>El-A.</surname>
            <given-names>Mobarak</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <addr-line>Department of Crops Technology Research, Food Technology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>15</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>1078</fpage>
      <lpage>1095</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11,</day>
          <month>November</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>19,</day>
          <month>December</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22,</day>
          <month>December</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
        <license>
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>


          The present study was undertaken to prepare instant porridge from some useful and available ingredients such as bulgur powder, potato, tomato, carrot, mung bean (unsoaked, soaked and germinated), then seasoned with onion, garlic, salt, black pepper, cumin and coriander to make B1, B2 and B3 formulas. Chemical, physical properties, amino acids and sensory evaluation of instant porridge formulas were determined. The data showed that B2 formula which contained soaked mung bean had the highest calories value, total essential amino acids, biological value and water absorption index (WAI) compared to the other formulas, also it is recorded the highest degree of lightness
          &lt;i&gt;
          L
          &lt;/i&gt;
          *
          values (82.39 and 56.65), least redness
          &lt;i&gt;
          a
          &lt;/i&gt;
          *
          values (0.98 and 1.45) and intermediate in yellowness
          &lt;i&gt;
          b
          &lt;/i&gt;
          *
          values (25.91 and 24.45) before and after rehydrated, respectively. Regarding to sensory evaluation, there was a significant increase in color, taste and overall acceptability in B2 compared to the other formulas. Based on these results, revealed that the soaked mung bean was a good source of essential amino acid and calories to enhance nutritional and technological quality of the resultant porridge.

        </p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Mung Bean</kwd>
        <kwd> Germination</kwd>
        <kwd> Porridge</kwd>
        <kwd> Nutritional Value</kwd>
        <kwd> Sensory Evaluation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="s1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Dried foods are considered instant food which preparation that meets the needs of consumers due to the changing conditions of modern life and the increase in the number of consumers who live alone and the lack of time to prepare meals, which led to an increase in request for these products. The advantages of dry foods are flavor stability in room temperature levels over long periods of time up to (6 - 12 months), and it is protected from enzymatic and oxidative activity damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref1">1</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        The dried porridge is a semi-solid food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref2">2</xref>]. It is prepared by adding flour to boiling water and stirring till it form homogenous thick gelatinized cluster free from agglomerate. Thick porridge is the source of calories, also recommended as a healthy food for the management of some non-communicable diseases such as type II diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref3">3</xref>]. Traditional porridge in developing countries is based on native wheat, rice, millet, sorghum, maize, cassava, and potato also, it is a suitable food for weaning infants and convalescent elderly due to easy digestibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref4">4</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        Cereals are good source of carbohydrates and proteins, vegetables complement the vitamins, antioxidants, fiber and phytochemicals therefore, a balance of nutrients may be obtained by integration of cereals and vegetables in the number of products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref5">5</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        Legumes are used to prepare foods alone or with cereals because cereal proteins are deficient in some essential amino acids, while legumes are good sources of carbohydrates, proteins, minerals, and vitamins. Legumes are consumed after processing such as dehulling, soaking and germination, which lead to improve palatability of foods and increase the bioavailability of nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref6">6</xref>]. Germinated legumes are used as an alternative in the food, one of the advantages of seed germination reduce the anti-nutritional factors and increase in the bioavailability of vitamins, carbohydrates, and polyvalent minerals such as calcium, iron, and magnesium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref7">7</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) is cultivated widely in South East Asia because their grains are rich in protein. The main advantages of mung bean are that, a legume does not require fertilization for nitrogen, require a little water, has a short growth cycle (75 - 90 days) and grows well in dry and semi-arid conditions and it is often grown in agricultural rotation with crops cereals like wheat and rice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref8">8</xref>]. Recently, mung bean has been incorporated successfully in the Egyptian agriculture to overcome the nutritional gap [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref9">9</xref>]. Department of Agronomy, National Research Centre produced variety (kawmy-1) has duration (90 - 110 days) during the ninety’s under clay soil conditions. These efforts adopted mung bean as a summer crop for most varieties around mid-May, but it did not fit well for cultivation in maize-wheat cropping system. Therefore, Agricultural Research Station, National Research Centre, El Nubaria Province, El Behaira Governorate, Egypt successfully generated genotypes under newly reclaimed sandy soil conditions that can be cultivated after harvesting of early summer crops (cereals cultivation) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref10">10</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        Bulgur production and consumption are increased due to its low cost, long shelf life, ease of preparation, taste, color, flavor, aroma, texture, high nutritional and economic values, also it contain protein, fat, carbohydrate, ash, fiber, calcium and iron [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref11">11</xref>].
      </p>
      <p>
        Cereals with legumes are considered complementary to nutritional quality due to the higher content of high biological value proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref12">12</xref>]. Therefore, this research aims to prepare instant porridge formulas by adding soaked and germinated mung bean with some vegetables and estimating their chemical, physical, technological quality and sensory properties of the resulting porridge.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="s2_1">
        <title>2.1. Materials</title>Raw Materials and Ingredients<p>Wheat bulgur, tomato, potato, carrot, black pepper, coriander, cumin, salt, onion and garlic powder were purchased from local market, Giza, Egypt. Mung bean Varity (Giza 1) was obtained from legume research department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3">
      <title>2.2. Methods</title>
      <sec id="s4_0_1">
        <title>2.2.1. Soaking and Germination Process of Mung Bean</title>
        <p>
          Mung bean was sorted and washed with tap water, then soaked for 12 hr. at room temperature. The soaked mung bean was placed in wet cloth and left for germination 48 hr. at room temperature Yasmin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref13">13</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>Unsoaked, soaked and germinated mung bean were cooked in boiling water at 100˚C for 45 min for unsoaked and 30 min for soaked and germinated mung bean then washed in cold water, then dried with hot air flow using air oven at 65˚C in the first four hours and then reduced to 50˚C till completely drying until constant weight. The dried samples were ground into powder using a grinder and sieved (250 micron) for identical size particles, then packed in polyethylene bags and kept in deep freezer for till using.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_2">
        <title>2.2.2. Preparation of Raw Materials and Ingredients</title>
        <p>Potato, tomato and carrot were sorted and washed, then the potato and carrot were peeled and sliced in cubic form and blanched in hot water at 100˚C for 10 - 15 min, then the tomato was peeled. Wheat bulgur was soaked for 6 hr. then cooking in boiling water at 100˚C for 30 min. All ingredients washed in cold water after boiling process, then dried with hot air flow using air oven at 65˚C in the first four hours and then reduced to 50˚C till completely drying to constant weight. The dried samples were ground into powder using a grinder and sieved (250 micron) for identical size particles, then packed in polyethylene bags and kept in deep freezer for till using.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_3">
        <title>2.2.3. Preparing of Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          All ingredients were spiced with onion and garlic powders, coriander, black pepper, cumin and salt to get three formulations of instant porridge, B1 had 30% unsoaked mung bean, B2 had 30% soaked mung bean and B3 contained 30% of the germinated mung bean as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The obtained formulas were packed in polyethylene bags and kept in deep freezer for till using.
        </p>
        <table-wrap id="table1" >
          <label>
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>
          </label>
          <caption>
            <title> Formulas of instant porridge (g/100g)</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Formulas Ingredients</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >B1</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >B2</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >B3</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheat Bulgur</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Potato</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Carrot</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Onion</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Garlic</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Black pepper</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumin</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Coriander</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Unsoaked mung bean</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Soaked mung bean for 12 hr.</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Germinated mung bean for 48 hr.</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_4">
        <title>2.2.4. Chemical Composition</title>
        <p>1) Chemical composition of dried instant porridge formulas</p>
        <p>
          Moisture, crude protein, fat, crude fiber and ash contents were determined according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref14">14</xref>]. Total carbohydrates were calculated by difference.
        </p>
        <p>2) Calories value</p>
        <p>
          Calories value was calculated by James [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref15">15</xref>] as follows:
        </p>
        <p>calories value ( Kca / 100 g ) = 4 ( protein ) + 4 ( carbohydrate ) + 9 ( fat )</p>
        <p>3) Amylose content</p>
        <p>
          Amylose content was determined by the colorimetric method according to Kumari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref16">16</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>4) Determination of amino acids profile</p>
        <p>
          Amino acids profile were determined using an Amino Acid Analyzer (Biochrom 30) using the instruction manual according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref14">14</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>5) Chemical score (CS)</p>
        <p>
          Chemical score was calculated according to FAO/WHO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref17">17</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>Chemical score ( % ) = ( EAA of crude protein / EAA of FAO / WHO ) &#215; 100</p>
        <p>6) Biological value (B.V)</p>
        <p>
          Biological value was positively correlated with the lysine concentration. It calculated according to Eggam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref18">18</xref>] as follows:
        </p>
        <p>Biological value ( % ) = 39.55 + 8.89 &#215; lysine ( g / 100 gprotein ) .</p>
        <p>7) Minerals content</p>
        <p>
          Minerals content were determined by using the flame photometer (Galien kamp, FGA 330, England) and Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. (Model 80, England) as described in AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref14">14</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>8) Determination of phytic acid content</p>
        <p>
          The phytic acid content was determined according to Park et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref19">19</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>9) Tannins content</p>
        <p>
          Tannin was determined by using the Vanillin-HCl method modified by Price et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref20">20</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_5">
        <title>2.2.5. Physical Properties of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          1) Water activity (a<sub>w</sub>)
        </p>
        <p>
          The water activity was measured using Rotronic Hygro lab CH-8303, Switzerland as mentioned by Cadden [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref21">21</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>2) Color Measurement</p>
        <p>
          External color was measured according to the method outlined by McGurie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref22">22</xref>] using a hand-held Chromameter (model CR-400, Konica Minolta, Japan).
        </p>
        <p>3) Water absorption index (WAI) and water solubility index (WSI)</p>
        <p>
          WAI and WSI were determined as described by Silvia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref23">23</xref>]. One gram of dried instant porridge samples were suspended with 10 ml distilled water at room temperature for 30 minutes, gently stirred during this period and then centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant liquid was poured carefully in to evaporating dish of known weight and dried at 110˚C to constant weight. The weight of the remaining gel was taken as WAI.
        </p>
        <p>WAI   g / g = weight of remaining gel Weight of dry porridge sample</p>
        <p>The amount of dried solids, recovered by evaporating the supernatant and expressed as percentage of dry solids was taken as WSI:</p>
        <p>WSI% = weight of dried solid in supernatan Weight of dry porridge sample &#215; 100</p>
        <p>4) Swelling power (SP)</p>
        <p>
          SP determined with the method described by Oladele and Aina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref24">24</xref>]. One gram of dried instant porridge samples were mixed with 10 ml distilled water in a centrifuge tube of known weight and heated at 90˚C for 30 min. This was continually shaken during the heating period. After heating, the suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was decanted and the weight of the porridge taken. The swelling power was calculated as:
        </p>
        <p>SP   g / g = weight of the swollen porridge sample weight of dry porridge sample</p>
        <p>5) Viscosity</p>
        <p>
          The dried instant porridge formulas were placed in a water bath to maintain at 40˚C (the temperature at which viscosity measurement was taken). Brookfield viscometer DV-III ultra was used to measure the porridge viscosity (in centipoises, cps) using spindle at a shear rate of 50 rpm in 30 seconds. Brookfield Viscometer for all porridge formulas were measured according to Tizazu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref25">25</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_6">
        <title>2.2.6. Rehydration Ratio (RR)</title>
        <p>
          RR was performed according to Huang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref26">26</xref>]. Two gram of dried instant porridge formulas were rehydrated in (20 ml) distilled water in a water bath at constant temperature and was agitated at constant speed. The samples were taken from the bath after 10 minutes and weight.
        </p>
        <p>The rehydration ratio was defined as the ratio of weight of rehydrated samples to the dry weight of the samples. The rehydration ratio was calculated using weight of samples before and after rehydration as follows:</p>
        <p>RR   ratio = W 2 − W 1 W 1</p>
        <p>W1 = the initial weight of the porridge samples;</p>
        <p>W2 = the final weight of the porridge samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_7">
        <title>2.2.7. Preparing of Rehydrated Instant Porridge for Sensory Evaluation</title>
        <p>
          The rehydrated instant porridge formulas were prepared according to Ocheme and Chinma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref27">27</xref>]. 20 g of dried porridge was mixed with 100 ml of cold water to form slurry and stirred continuously for 10 min until the mixed completely converted into soft cooked porridge formed, at 100˚C to 120˚C. Then it was removed from the heater and allowed to cool to 30˚C to make ready to serve.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_8">
        <title>2.2.8. Sensory Evaluation of Rehydrated Instant Porridge</title>
        <p>
          Sensory acceptability in terms of color, odor, taste and overall acceptability of porridge. The evaluation was carried out by ten panelists using hedonic scales in order to assess the acceptability of each product 1 to 9 (where 1 = very much disliked, 9 = very much liked,) according to Ocheme and Chinma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref27">27</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s4_0_9">
        <title>2.2.9. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>
          The obtained data were exposed to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Duncan is multiple range tests at (P ≤ 0.05) level was used to compare between means values according to Waller and Duncan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref28">28</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
     
    <sec id="s5">
      <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="s5_1">
        <title>3.1. Chemical Composition of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed that B1 formula had the lowest value of carbohydrate and amylose content, while B2 had the lowest value of ash and crude fiber. Our results agree with Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref29">29</xref>] who reported that the ash content after soaking was reduced. On the other hand the crude protein slightly decreased in B2 than B1, this might be due to leaching of soluble protein into soaking water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref30">30</xref>]. While B3 was significantly decreased in fat, protein and calories value compared to B1 and B2, these reduction in protein and fat during the germination process may be due to the increased activity of the protease enzyme that breaks down the protein for use in growth sprouts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref32">32</xref>], the reduction in fat may be due to the oxidation of fats to carbon dioxide and water to produce the energy needed for germination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref34">34</xref>].
        </p>
        <table-wrap id="table2" >
          <label>
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>
          </label>
          <caption>
            <title> Chemical composition of dried instant porridge formulas on dry weight basis</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash (%)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fiber (%)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Fats (%)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (%)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates (%)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Calories value kcal/100g</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Amylose (%)</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.17 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.04
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.54 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.28 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  13.59 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.05
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  79.42 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.08
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  392.56 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.58
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  16.63 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.17<sup> </sup>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.86 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.01
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.88 <sup>c</sup> &#177; .01
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.03 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.01
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  13.04 <sup>ab</sup> &#177; 0.04
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  81.19 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.2
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  395.19 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.17
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  17.48 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.11
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.01 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.03
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.23 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.06
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.60 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.03
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  12.75 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.03
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  81.41 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  391.04 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.36
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  19.11 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.30<sup> </sup>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3:porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_2">
        <title>3.2. Amino Acids, Chemical Score and Biological Value of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          The essential amino acids are necessary for tissue protection and can’t be synthesized by the body and an important index of protein quality in food product. Results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that B3 formula had the lowest level in total essential and non-essential amino acids (30.90 and 50.29 g/100g protein, respectively) compared to B1 and B2, may be due to the consumption of amino acids in the formation of new tissues during growth.
        </p>
        <p>
          Furthermore, B2 formula had the highest level of the total non-essential amino acids and total aromatic amino acids (Phenylalanine and Tyrosine) compared to the other formulas, may be due to the soaking process which caused an increase in the total non-essential amino acids than total essential amino acids, also the total aromatic amino acid was the highest than the other essential amino acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref30">30</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>
          On the other hand the data in the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Indicated that the all formulas were high in the total non-essential amino acids than the total essential amino acids as well as the total Phenylalanine and Tyrosine were high compared to the other essential amino acids.
        </p>
        <p>
          Chemical score is a method for assessing the quality of a dietary protein in a diet, measured by the ratio of a gram of the limiting amino acid in a diet for the same amount of the identical amino acid in a reference diet multiplied in 100. From the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> observed that the chemical score of aromatic essential amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine) was the highest value compared to the other essential amino acids in all formulas.
        </p>
        <p>
          The limiting amino acids of all formulas were lysine, may be due to contain the lowest of chemical score, where the limiting amino acid is known as the acid that had a low protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref35">35</xref>]. The reduction in lysine is due to the processing methods as soaking, cooking and germination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref36">36</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>
          The biological value described how well the body absorbs protein and measure the percentage of protein actually utilized in human body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref37">37</xref>]. The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that B2 formula was the highest in the biological values 83.19% compared to the other formulas, may be due to contain high lysine content (4.91 g/100g protein), where the high lysine content was associated with an increase of the biological value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref38">38</xref>].
        </p>
        <table-wrap id="table3" >
          <label>
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>
          </label>
          <caption>
            <title> Amino acids, chemical score and biological value of dried instant porridge formulas g/100</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >samples</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >B1</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >B2</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >B3</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" ></th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >E.A.A</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A of g/100g sample</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A g/100g protein</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical score</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A of g/100g sample</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A g/100g protein</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical score</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A of g/100g sample</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >A.A g/100g protein</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical score</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >FAO/WHO g/100g</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Leucine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.89</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >7.13</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >120.84</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >97.12</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Valine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >113.33</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >139.49</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >100.51</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >96.44</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.91</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >109.11</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >95.78</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolucine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >112.66</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >135.33</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >96.67</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenylalanin + Tyrosine (AAA)</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 0.40</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42 2.94</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >245.33</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 0.43</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44 3.30</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >291.33</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 0.36</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92 2.82</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >224.67</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >AAA 3.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Methonine + Cystine **(SAA)</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 0.26</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39 1.91</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 0.23</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 1.76</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >149.55</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 0.15</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 1.18</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >107.27</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >SAA 2.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Theronine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >127.83</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >143.48</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >133.04</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Hisitidine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >184</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >125.33</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Tryptophan</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Total E.A.A</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.59</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >33.76</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >128.37</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >39.63</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >150.68</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >30.90</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >117.49</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical score (Lysine score)</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >96.44</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >109.11</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >95.78</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Limiting Amino acids</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Lysine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Lysine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Lysine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B.V</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >78.13</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >83.19</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >77.87</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-E.A.A</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspartic</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >13.20</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >9.57</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Serine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.52</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Glutamic</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >20.95</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >21.63</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >19.92</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Glycine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Alanin</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Argnine</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >proline</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >6.14</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Non –E.A.A</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >7.13</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >54.71</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >59.82</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >6.41</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >50.29</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3: porridge formula + germinated mung bean, EAA = essential amino acids, ND = not detected, B.V = biological value, AAA = aromatic amino acids, SAA = sulfur amino acids, FAO/WHO (2007).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_3">
        <title>3.3. Minerals of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          Minerals are essential chemical elements that play a role in glucose homeostasis, the transmission of nerve impulses and enzyme cofactors in the body. Macro minerals are needed in large amounts, while trace minerals are needed in very small amounts. The minerals content of instant porridge formulas were presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. B1 formula recorded the lowest content of minerals except K
        </p>
        <table-wrap id="table4" >
          <label>
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>
          </label>
          <caption>
            <title> Minerals of dried instant porridge formulas (mg/100g)</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Macro minerals</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Trace minerals</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" ></td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Se</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  194.57 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.43
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1540.41 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.61
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  155.71 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.62
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  677.01 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.97
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  4.32 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.30
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.33 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.08 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  0.74 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.01
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.35 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  206.86 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.82
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1520.98 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.78
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  197.19 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.29
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  706.29 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.43
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  4.75 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  2.91 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.13 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  0.74 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.63 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  220.89 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.94
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1449.71 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.29
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  233.76 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.26
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  715.68 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.66
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  4.92 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.07
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  3.06 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.40
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.34 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  0.85 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  1.83 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3:porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.</p>
        <p>which recorded high (1540.41 mg/100g). Macro and trace minerals significantly increased in B3 formula except K that significantly decreased (1449.71 mg/100g) compared to the other formulas, this reduction may be due to soaking and germination.</p>
        <p>
          The rising of minerals as a result to decrease anti-nutritional factors leached out during the soaking process and degraded during germination. Processing methods like, soaking, germination and cooking lead to decrease that the anti-nutritional factors and increase minerals bioavailability (Ca, Cu, Mn and Zn), nutritive value and enhance the digestibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref39">39</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_4">
        <title>3.4. Phytic Acid and Tannin Content of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>Anti-nutritional factors, such as phytic acid was has a negative charged which bond with positively charged divalent minerals ions making them unavailable for absorption and tannin are chemical compounds that affect digestion, bioavailability and limit the full benefit of nutrients in food.</p>
        <p>
          The results in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> illustrated that B3 formula had the highest reduction in phytic acid and tannin content (0.40% and 0.09%), respectively followed by B2 formula (0.63% and 0.21%), respectively. The reduction of Polyphenols (tannin) and phytic acid could be attribute to leach them with soaking water, also due to the increasing activity of phytase which responsible for the hydrolysis of phytic acid during traditional processing techniques such as soaking and germination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref41">41</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_5">
        <title>3.5. Physical Properties of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <sec id="s5_5_1">
          <title>3.5.1. Moisture Content and Water Activity</title>
          <p>
            Water has effects on food stability, palatability and quality, also has an effect on the shelf life of foodstuffs, furthermore moisture content can effect on the physical properties such as hardness, clotting in powder product. The results of the moisture content and water activity for the dried porridge formulas are illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The results showed that all the given values of the moisture content were ranged (6.43% - 6.77%). B1 formula significant decreased in moisture content, while both B2 and B3 were high moisture content (6.77% and 6.64%), respectively but it was within the permissible limits. The dried materials are considered more quality when the moisture content was less than 10% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref42">42</xref>]. The microorganisms cannot growth when moisture content is below 8% in dehydrated food, however if the moisture content is over 18% some microorganisms may be increased gradually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref1">1</xref>].
          </p>
          <table-wrap id="table5" >
            <label>
              <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>
            </label>
            <caption>
              <title> Moisture content and water activity of dried instant porridge formulas</title>
            </caption>
            <table>
              <tbody>
                <thead>
                  <tr>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture content (%)</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >
                      Water activity (a<sub>w</sub>)
                    </th>
                  </tr>
                </thead>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.43 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    0.42 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.01
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.77 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.03
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    0.44 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.03
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.64 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.03
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    0.43 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3:porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.</p>
          <p>
            Water activity is a measure of free water in food which leads to the growth of various microorganisms; also it is related to the chemical stability of dried food products and important reference for the shelf life of foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref43">43</xref>]. The results from the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> showed that the water activity of the all formulas was not high, water activity was ranged (0.42 - 0.44) that is considered less than the level growth of any microorganisms. The reduction of water activity often effects of microbial growth and it increases the shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref44">44</xref>]. The least water activity value for growth of all microorganisms in food was at less than 0.6 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref45">45</xref>].
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="s5_5_2">
          <title>3.5.2. Color Characteristics of Dried and Rehydrated Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
          <p>
            Color is one of important quality attributes to the overall acceptance of the food product. The degree of lightness, redness and yellowness of dried and rehydrated porridge formulas are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. B2 formula recorded the highest degree of lightness L* values (82.39 and 56.65), least redness a* value (0.98 and 1.45) before and after rehydrated, respectively compared to B1 and B3 formulas. While B1 recorded the lowest degrees in lightness L* and the highest degrees of redness a* before and after rehydrated. On the other hand B3 had the lowest degrees in yellowness b* after rehydrated (24.14). The lightness L* were high in B2 then B3 may be due to remove some pigments during soaking treatment, where the water soluble polyphenols leaching out in water after soaking process, also heat processes caused significant reduction in polyphenol contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref46">46</xref>].
          </p>
          <p>
            Moreover observed a reduction in the degree of lightness L* and yellowness b* as well as the rising degree of redness a* after rehydrated for all formulas, the variation in color among the porridge before and after rehydrated may be attributed to reducing sugars which promotes Millard browning reaction during the heat processes, which contribute to color changes. Millard reaction is responsible for changes in food color, organoleptic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref47">47</xref>].
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="s5_5_3">
          <title>3.5.3. Water Absorption Index (WAI) and Water Solubility Index (WSI) of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
          <p>
            WAI and WSI are the parameters to describe the hydration properties of porridge. WAI measures the volume of starch granules after swelling in excess water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref5">5</xref>]. WAI and WSI of the porridge formulas are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. Where WAI ranged (5. 32 - 6. 62 g/g), B2 formula had the highest WAI followed by B3, while B1 was the lowest.
          </p>
          <table-wrap id="table6" >
            <label>
              <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>
            </label>
            <caption>
              <title> Color characteristics of dried and rehydrated instant porridge formulas</title>
            </caption>
            <table>
              <tbody>
                <thead>
                  <tr>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" ></th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >The dried instant porridge formulas</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >The rehydrated instant porridge formulas</th>
                  </tr>
                </thead>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    L<sup>* </sup>
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    a<sup>*</sup>
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    b<sup>*</sup>
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    L<sup>* </sup>
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    a<sup>*</sup>
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    b<sup>* </sup>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    79.91 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.35
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    3.88 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.27
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    28.38 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.05
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    51.35 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.41
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    4.77 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.17
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    25.56 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.35
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    82.39 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.15
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    0.98 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.12
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    25.91 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.05
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    56.65 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.10
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    1.45 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.05
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    24.45 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.05
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    81.51 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.20
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    1.75 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.04
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    27.40 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.06
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    53.55 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.23
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    1.87 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.05
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    24.14 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.33
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3:porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. L*:= lightness (100) to darkness (zero); a*: redness (+) to greenness (-); b*: yellowness (+) to blueness (-).</p>
          <table-wrap id="table7" >
            <label>
              <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>
            </label>
            <caption>
              <title> Water absorption Index and water solubility Index of dried instant porridge formulas</title>
            </caption>
            <table>
              <tbody>
                <thead>
                  <tr>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >WAI (g/g)</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >WSI (%)</th>
                  </tr>
                </thead>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    5.32 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.09
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    22.5 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.30
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.62 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.02
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    17.15 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.30
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    5.55 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.03
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    16.12 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.20
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3: porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. L*:= lightness (100) to darkness (zero); a*: redness (+) to greenness (-); b*: yellowness (+) to blueness (-).</p>
          <p>
            WSI measures the amount of soluble degradation from the starch, which is often used as an indication of degradation of starch molecules and dextrin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref48">48</xref>]. Also, it is indicated of water penetration ability into starch granules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref49">49</xref>]. From the same TableWSI ranged (16.12% - 22.5%), where B1 formula recorded the highest of WSI compared to B2 and B3. WAI increased and WSI decreased with increase in feed moisture content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref50">50</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref5">5</xref>].
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="s5_5_4">
          <title>3.5.4. Swelling Power (SP) and Viscosity of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
          <p>
            Swelling is originally a property of the amylopectin, which is regulated the crystallization of the starch before full gelatinization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref51">51</xref>]. SP is the ability of flours to increase in volume, it is also considered as a quality criterion in some food formulations and it is an index of bonding between molecules within starch granules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref52">52</xref>]. Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> showed that the SP ranged (5.11 - 6.79 g/g), where B3 formula had the lowest value, while B1 had the highest value. The rising of SP may due to lower the amylose content, where the swelling power showed weak negative correlation with amylose content, also the starch high in swelling contains low amylose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref53">53</xref>].
          </p>
          <table-wrap id="table8" >
            <label>
              <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>
            </label>
            <caption>
              <title> Swelling power (SP) and viscosity of dried instant porridge formulas</title>
            </caption>
            <table>
              <tbody>
                <thead>
                  <tr>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >SP (g/g)</th>
                    <th align="center" valign="middle" >Viscosity (CP)</th>
                  </tr>
                </thead>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.79 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.03
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    4793 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 11.54
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    6.46 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    3999 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 12.50
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    5.11 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.04
                  </td>
                  <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                    3243 <sup>c</sup> &#177; 11.71
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3: porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.</p>
          <p>
            The viscosity is an important characteristic of liquid foods in many food processing, the rheological behavior of foods during processing is useful for quality control purposes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref54">54</xref>]. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>, the viscosity of porridge formulas ranged (3243 - 4793 CP), where B1 formula significantly increased compared to B2 and B3. Whereas, B3 had the lowest value of viscosity followed by B2 formula. The reduction in viscosity of B2 and B3 may refer to soaked, germination, raising moisture and amylose content. At high moisture content, the viscosity of the starch would be low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref55">55</xref>]. Composite flour made from germinated and soaked cereals significantly lower in viscosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref56">56</xref>]. The differences in final viscosity could be due to variations in amylose content, where the viscosity negatively correlated with amylose content. Low amylose content of starch is associated with higher viscosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref53">53</xref>].
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_6">
        <title>3.6. Rehydration Ratio of Dried Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          The rehydration ratio indicates the ability of dried materials to absorb water and to hold soluble solids inside the dried material. Also, it is a considered an important characteristic of many products, which later preparation for consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref57">57</xref>] and used it as a quality characteristic of the dried product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref58">58</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>
          The rehydration ratio of the dried porridge formulas increased significantly in B1 formula compared to the other formulas shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, this may be attributed to the limited initial moisture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref59">59</xref>]. Also, due to lower water activity and water content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref1">1</xref>].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s5_7">
        <title>3.7. Sensory Evaluation of the Rehydrated Instant Porridge Formulas</title>
        <p>
          Sensory Evaluation is a good way to solve problems associated with food acceptance. The end product should be free from unacceptable taste and odor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref60">60</xref>].
        </p>
        <p>
          Sensory evaluation of the rehydrated instant porridge according to color, taste, odor and overall acceptability were illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>. There were a significant increase in color, taste and overall acceptability in B2 formula compared to the other formulas, the lighter color made them more acceptable, where consumers are used to this color in the food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.105968-ref27">27</xref>].
        </p>
        <table-wrap id="table9" >
          <label>
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>
          </label>
          <caption>
            <title> Sensory evaluation of the rehydrated instant porridge formulas</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Color (9)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Odor (9)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Taste (9)</th>
                  <th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall acceptability (9)</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.6 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.52
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.8 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.73
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  6.6 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.76
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.4 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.51
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  8.4 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.51
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  8.4 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.53
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.6 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.65
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  8.2 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.42
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.5 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.47
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  8.0 <sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.66
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  6.8 <sup>ab</sup> &#177; 0.89
                </td>
                <td align="center" valign="middle" >
                  7.4 <sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.52
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>B1: porridge formula + unsoaked mung bean, B2: porridge formula + soaked mung bean, B3: porridge formula + germinated mung bean, Values are mean of ten replicates &#177; SD, means with different letters at the same column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s6">
      <title>4. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The results of this study revealed that B3 formula which contained soaked mung bean was a good source of calories, essential amino acid to enhance biological value, nutritional and technological quality of the resultant porridge. Therefore, we advise to expand mung bean cultivation in Egypt as a new variety because it has high nutritional value, good source of energy, protein and minerals and comparatively cheap compared to meat, also can be useful as high energy foods for the patients, the poor and the needy.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s7">
      <title>Conflicts of Interest</title>
      <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s8">
      <title>Cite this paper</title>
      <p>Mahgoub, S.A., Mohammed, A.T. and Mobarak, El-A. (2020) Physiochemical, Nutritional and Technological Properties of Instant Porridge Supplemented with Mung Bean. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 11, 1078-1095. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2020.1112076</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel-Haleem, A.M.H. and Omran, A.A. (2014) Preparation of Dried Vegetarian Soup Supplemented with Some Legumes. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5, 2274-2285. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/fns.2014.522241</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Susilowati, A., Maryati, Y. and Aspiyanto (2019) Formulation of Instant Porridge by Using Natural Folic Acid Fortificant as a Complementary Infant Feeding. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2175, Article ID: 020014. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5134578</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onyango, C. and Wanjala, G.W. (2018) Quality of Porridge from Sub-Saharan Africa Evaluated Using Instrumental Techniques and Descriptive Sensory Lexicon: Part 1: Thick (Stiff) Porridge. African Journal of Food Science, 12, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2014.1674</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;#352;imurina, O.D., Filip&amp;#269;ev, B.V., Mari&amp;#263;, B.D., Cvetkovi&amp;#263;, B.R. and Bodroza Solarov, M.I. (2018) Comparative Study on the Physico-Chemical, Textural and Thermal Properties of Instant Porridges Based on Spelt and Oats. Food and Feed Research, 45, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.5937/FFR1801027S</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gandhi, N. and Singh, B. (2014) Study of Extrusion Behavior and Porridge Making Characteristics of Wheat and Guava Formulas. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 3030-3036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1302-1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tharanathan, R.N. and Mahadevamma, S. (2003) Grain Legumes—A Boon to Human Nutrition. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 14, 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.07.002</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangronis, E., Rodriguez, M., Cava, R. and Torres, A. (2006) Protein Quality of Germinated Phaseolus Vulgaris. European Food Research and Technology, 222, Article No. 144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0137-4</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahiya, P.K., Linnemann, A.R., Van Boekel, M.A.J.S., Khetarpaul, N., Grewal, R.B. and Nout, M.J.R. (2015) Mung Bean: Technological and Nutritional Potential. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55, 670-688.https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.671202</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Abd El-Lateef</surname>
            <given-names> E.M.</given-names>
          </name>,<name name-style="western">
            <surname> Bakry</surname>
            <given-names> B.A.</given-names>
          </name>,<name name-style="western">
            <surname> Abd El-Salam</surname>
            <given-names> M.S. and Elewa T.A. </given-names>
          </name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Varietal Tolerance to Biological Stress</article-title><source> International Journal of ChemTech Research</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 477</fpage>-<lpage>487</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hozayn, M., El-Habbasha, S.F., Abd El-Lateef, E.M. and Abd El-Monem, A.A. (2013) Genetic Variability in 16 Exotic Mung Bean Genotypes for Late Sowing Under Egyptian Conditions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9, 643-651.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yousif, S.I., Bayram, M. and Kesen, S. (2018) Characterization of Volatile Compounds of Bulgur (Antep Type) Produced from Durum Wheat. Journal of Food Quality, 2018, Article ID: 8564086. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8564086</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, C.T., Gutierrez, é.M.R., Márcio, C., Monteiro, M.R.P., Labanca, R.A. and Carreira, R.L. (2015) Development and Characterization of Extruded Broken Rice and Lupine (Lupinus albus). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 1928-1936. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.612194</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasmin, A., Zeb, A., Khalil, A.W., Paracha, G.M. and Khattak, A.B. (2008) Effect of Processing on Antinutritional Factors of Red Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Grains. Food Bioprocess Technology, 1, 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0125-3</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (2010) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">James, C.S. (1995) Chapter 6: General Food Studies. In: James, C.S., Ed., Analytical Chemistry of Foods, Springer, Boston, 137-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2165-5_6</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumari, M., Urooj, A. and Narayan Prasad, N. (2007) Effect of Storage on Resistant Starch and Amylose Content of Cereal-Pulse Based Ready-to-Eat Commercial Products. Food Chemistry, 102, 1425-1430.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.022</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO/WHO (2007) Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization. Energy and Protein Requirement. No. 935, Geneva.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eggam, B.O., Villegas, E.M. and Vasal, S.K. (1979) Progress in Protein Quality of Maize. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 30, 1148-1153.https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740301206</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, H.R., Ahn, H.J., Kim, S.H., Lee, C.H., Byun, M.W. and Lee, G.W. (2006) Determination of the Phytic Acid Level in Infant Foods Using Different Analytical Methods. Food Control, 17, 727-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.05.007</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Price, M.L., Van Scoyoc, S. and Butler, L.G. (1978) A Critical Evaluation of Vanillin Reaction as an Assay for Tannin in Sorghum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 26, 1214-1218. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60219a031</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cadden, A.M. (1988) Moisture Sorption Characteristics of Several Food Fibers. Journal of Food Science, 53, 1150-1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb13550.x</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>McGurie</surname>
            <given-names> R.G. </given-names>
          </name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Reporting of Objective Color Measurements</article-title><source> HortScience</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 1254</fpage>-<lpage>1255</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silvia, M.C., Carvalho, C.W.P. and Andrade, C.T. (2009) The Effects of Water and Sucrose Contents on the Physicochemical Properties of Non-Directly Expanded Rice Flour Extrudates. Food Science and Technology, 29, 661-666. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009000300032</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oladele, A.K. and Aina, J.O. (2007) Chemical Composition and Functional Properties of Flour Produced from Two Varieties of Tigernut (Cyperus esculentus). African Journal of Biotechnology, 6, 2473-2476. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2391</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tizazu, S., Urga, K., Abuye, C. and Retta, N. (2010) Improvement of Energy and Nutrient Density of Sorghum Based Complementary Food Using Germination. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 10, 2927-2942.https://doi.org/10.4314/ajfand.v10i8.60875</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, L.L., Zhang, M., Yan, W.Q, Mujumdar, A.S. and Sun, D.F. (2009) Effect of Coating on Post-Drying of Freeze-Dried Strawberry Pieces. Journal of Food Engineering, 92, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.031</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ocheme, O.B. and Chinma, C.E. (2008) Effects of Soaking and Germination on Some Physicochemical Properties of Millet Flour for Porridge Production. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 6, 185-188.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref28">
        <label>28</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waller, R.A. and Duncan, D.B. (1969) A Bayes Rule for Symmetric Multiple Composition Problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1484-1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10501073</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref29">
        <label>29</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, N., Lewis, M.J., Brennan, J.G. and Westby, A. (1997) Optimization of Germination Process of Cowpea by Response Surface Methodology. Food Chemistry, 58, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00200-2</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref30">
        <label>30</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Widjajaseputra, A.I., Widyastuti, T.E.W. and Trisnawati, C.Y. (2019) Potency of Mung Bean with Different Soaking Times as Protein Source for Breastfeeding Women in Indonesia. Food Research, 3, 501-505.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref31">
        <label>31</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veluppillai, S., Nithyanantharajah, K., Vasantharuba, S., Balakumar, S. and Arasaratnam, V. (2009) Biochemical Changes Associated with Germinating Rice Grains and Germination Improvement. Rice Science, 16, 240-242.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60085-2</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref32">
        <label>32</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Megat Rusydi, M.R., Noraliza, C.W., Azrina, A. and Zulkhairi, A. (2011) Nutritional Changes in Germinated Legumes and Rice Varieties. International Food Research Journal, 18, 705-713.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref33">
        <label>33</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masood, T., Shah, H.U. and Zeb, A. (2014) Effect of Sprouting Time on Proximate C\Composition and Ascorbic Acid Level of Mung Bean (Vigna radlat L.) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seeds. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24, 850-859.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref34">
        <label>34</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hahma, T.S., Park, S.J. and Martin Lo, Y. (2009) Effects of Germination on Chemical Composition and Functional Properties of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Seeds. Bioresource Technology, 100, 1643-1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.034</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref35">
        <label>35</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO/FAO/UNU (2007) World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and United Nations University, Geneva. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/ UNU Expert Consultation.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref36">
        <label>36</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EL-Suhaibani, M., Ahmed, M.A. and Osman, M.A. (2020) Study of Germination, Soaking and Cooking Effects on the Nutritional Quality of Goat Pea (Securigera securidaca L.). Journal of King Saud University-Science, 32, 2029-2033.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.02.021</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref37">
        <label>37</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2007) World Health Organization. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition. Technical Report Series, No. 935, Geneva.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref38">
        <label>38</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ibrahim</surname>
            <given-names> O.S. </given-names>
          </name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Utilization of Sorghum, Broken Rice and White Beans Flours for Producing High Nutritional Value and High Quality Gluten-Free Biscuits</article-title><source> Current Science International</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 670</fpage>-<lpage>683</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref39">
        <label>39</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaushik, G., Satya, S. and Naik, S.N. (2010) Effect of Domestic Processing Techniques on the Nutritional Quality of the Soybean. Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 3, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.3233/s12349-009-0079-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref40">
        <label>40</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, Y.-W., Xie, W.-H., Jin, X.-X., Wang, Q. and Zai, X.-M. (2013) Effects of Germination and Cooking for Enhanced in Vitro Iron, Calcium and Zinc Bioaccessibility from Faba Bean, Azuki Bean and Mung Bean Sprouts. CyTA—Journal of Food, 11, 318-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2012.757756</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref41">
        <label>41</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, V., Sinha, A.K., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. (2010) Dietary Roles of Phytate and Phytase in Human Nutrition: A Review. Food Chemistry, 120, 945-959.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.052</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref42">
        <label>42</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Wakeel, M.A. (2007) Ultra Structure and Functional Properties of Some Dry Mixes of Food. M.Sc. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref43">
        <label>43</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bonazzi, C. and Dumoulin, E. (2011) Chapter 1: Quality Changes in Food Materials as Influenced by Drying Processes. In: Tsotsas, E. and Mujumdar, A.S., Eds., Modern Drying Technology: Product Quality and Formulation, Vol. 3, 1st Edition, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527631667.ch1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref44">
        <label>44</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed, A.T., Elsheikh, D.M. and Tawfik, M.M. (2018) Utilization of Broken Rice, Corn and Sweet Lupin Flour for Preparation High Nutritional Value and Quality Gluten-Free Basbousa. Current Science International, 07, 578-589.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref45">
        <label>45</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Safefood 360, Inc. (2014) Water Activity [aw] in Foods. Whitepapers Series 8.www.safefood360.com</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref46">
        <label>46</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grewal, A. and Jood, S. (2006) Effect of Processing Treatments on Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Contents of Green Gram. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 30, 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2006.00080.x</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref47">
        <label>47</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lund, M.N. and Ray, C.A. (2017) Control of Maillard Reactions in Foods: Strategies and Chemical Mechanisms. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65, 4537-4552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00882</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref48">
        <label>48</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yousf, N., Nazir, F., Salim, R., Ahsan, H. and Sirwal, A. (2017) Water Solubility Index and Water Absorption Index of Extruded Product from Rice and Carrot Formula. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6, 2165-2168.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref49">
        <label>49</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikegwu, O.J., Okechukwu, P.E. and Ekumankama, E.O. (2010) Physico-Chemical and Pasting of Flour and Starch from Achi Brachystegia eurycoma Seed. Journal of Food Technology, 8, 58-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jftech.2010.58.66</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref50">
        <label>50</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, Q.B., Ainsworth, P., Tucker, G. and Marson, H. (2005) The Effect of Extrusion Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties and Sensory Characteristics of Rice-Based Expanded Snacks. Journal of Food Engineering, 66, 283-289.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.03.019</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref51">
        <label>51</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tester, R.F. and Morrison, W.R. (1990a) Swelling and Gelatinization of Cereal Starches. I. Effects of Amylopectin, Amylose and Lipids. Cereal Chemistry, 67, 551-557.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref52">
        <label>52</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moses, M.O. and Olanrewaju, M.J. (2018) Evaluation of Functional and Pasting Properties of Different Corn Starch Flours. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 3, 95-99.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref53">
        <label>53</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chisenga, S.M., Workneh, T.S., Bultosa, G. and Laing, M. (2019) Characterization of Physicochemical Properties of Starches from Improved Cassava Varieties Grown in Zambia. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 4, 939-966.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref54">
        <label>54</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonio, G.C., Faria, F.R., Takeiti, C.Y. and Park, K.J. (2009) Rheological Behavior of Blueberry. Ciênc Tecnology Aliment Campinas, 29, 732-737.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009000400006</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref55">
        <label>55</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawton, B.T., Handerson, G.A. and Derlatka, E.J. (1972) The Effects of Extruder Variables on the Gelatinization of Corn Starch. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 50, 168-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450500205</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref56">
        <label>56</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haile, A. and Shufa, T. (2019) Development of Porridge from Kocho and Chickpea Composite Flours: Evaluation of Nutritional Composition and Functional Properties of the Flours and Sensory Properties of the Porridge. Journal of Food Processing &amp; Technology, 10, 788.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref57">
        <label>57</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joki&amp;#263;, S., Muji&amp;#263;, I., Martinov, M., Veli&amp;#263;, D., Bili&amp;#263;, M. and Lukinac, J. (2009) Influence of Drying Procedure on Colour and Rehydration Characteristic of Wild Asparagus. Czech Journal of Food Science, 27, 171-177. https://doi.org/10.17221/149/2008-CJFS</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref58">
        <label>58</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veli&amp;#263;, D., Planini&amp;#263;, M., Tomas, S. and Bili&amp;#263;, M. (2004) Influence of Airflow Velocity on Kinetics of Convection Apple Drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 64, 97-102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.016</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref59">
        <label>59</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rhim, J.W., Koh, S. and Kim, J.M. (2011) Effect of Freezing Temperature on Rehydration and Water Vapor Adsorption Characteristics of Freeze-Dried Rice Porridge. Journal of Food Engineering, 104, 484-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.010</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.105968-ref60">
        <label>60</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abeysinghe, C.P. and Illepruma, C.K. (2006) Formulation of an MSG (Monosodium glutamate) Free Instant Vegetable Soup Mix. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 34, 91-95. http://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v34i2.2087</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>