<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2020.1111073</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-104336</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Identification of Ethiopian Yam (&lt;i&gt;Dioscorea&lt;/i&gt; spp.) Collections and Their Phenotypic Diversity Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atnafua</surname><given-names>Bekele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Endashaw</surname><given-names>Bekele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>South Agricultural Research Institute, Hawassa Agricultural Research Centre, Hawassa, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Addis Ababa Universities, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1116</fpage><lpage>1132</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Yam plant has a major role in Ethiopia particularly in densely populated areas of south, southwestern, and western parts of the country. It grows in a wide range of soils with an altitude range of 1140 to 2200 masl. This study was done to identify yam species collected from major producing areas of the country. The total of sixty yam accessions from ten different geographic origins of South and Oromiya region of Ethiopia were used. The collected samples were planted in complete randomized block design at two research sites of South Agricultural Research Institute. Forty-five qualitative morphological characterizations were used to characterize and identify 
  <em>Dioscorea</em> species. Among these qualitative characters observed in the study presence and absence of spines on stems and roots, number of male and female inflorescence, stem length, twining direction, and flesh color were the major traits considered for species identification. The organoleptic properties evaluation was carried out using fifteen selected local farmers. Statistical analysis was done using Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.02 NTSYpc software program and the data reduction function of SPSS for windows. Based on this study, sixty yam germplams of ten major growing areas of the country were identified into six 
  <em>Dioscorea</em> species. These identified 
  <em>Dioscorea</em> species were again subjected to qualitative morphological characterization and 33 morphological traits revealed variability. This implies presence of high diversity in yam (
  <em>Dioscorea</em> species) of Ethiopia. Most of the morphological variations among the yam genotypes were contributed by young petiole color, tendency of tuber to branch, and tuber flesh color. Hence, these morphological traits could be taken as useful traits for identification of yam cultivars.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Yam</kwd><kwd> Species</kwd><kwd> Characterization</kwd><kwd> Morphology</kwd><kwd> Traits</kwd><kwd> Diversity</kwd><kwd> Organoleptic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Yam is cultivated mainly for its tuber. It is a major source of carbohydrates and nutrient energy for many people in tropical countries including east and West Africa, the Carribean, South Africa, India and South East Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref2">2</xref>]. Ethiopia is the fifth largest yam producing country of Africa and its annual production is estimated at about 1,191,809 metric tons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref3">3</xref>]. The crop plays a vital role in local livelihood particularly in densely populated areas of south, southwestern, and western parts of the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref5">5</xref>]. About nine types of yam have been reported to grow in Ethiopia indicating the diversity of the species in the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Yams have become an important cash crop in most localities. Yams are also served during the traditional festival which coincides with the peak harvesting time thus allowing farmers to earn profit from the market. It grows in the altitude range of 1140 to 2200 and in a wide range of soils mainly in clay, clay loam, sandy and sandy loam types. It is planted in October (in most parts of South Ethiopia), November and December (in South Western and Western part of the country) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref7">7</xref>]. The present work is to identify Ethiopian yam collections from major growing areas of the country into their Dioscorea species group and study their phenotypic diversity.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Morphological Characterization and Yam Landraces</title><p>Sixty yam accessions from ten different geographic origins of Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Regional State and Oromiya region of the country were used for this study. The sprouted tubers of some accessions were obtained from Research Centers whereas others were directly collected from farmers’ fields during early March, 2010 as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The samples collected were planted on April 2010 in complete randomized block design with three replication at two research sites (namely at Hawassa and Wonago) which are found under South Agricultural Research Institute at the end of April 2010 as indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. All important cultural practices such as staking, weeding and irrigation were done starting from planting till harvesting.</p><p>Among 45 morphological characters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) observed in the study presence and absence of spines on stems and roots, number of male and female inflorescence, stem length, twining direction, and flesh color were the major traits considered for species identification. The species identification was done through observing some earlier developed identification keys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref7">7</xref>].</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Ethiopian yam germplasms with their origin site, vernacular name and respective altitudes used in the study</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SN</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Accessions name</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Place of collection</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woreda (local name)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Altitude (masl)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ji/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ge/004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wonago</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dila</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Gofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonke (Kemba)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1540</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/BD/065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kefa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1600</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/BD055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kefa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1600</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Gofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arbaminch (Hatiya-2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Gofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breda (Bunne-2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1655</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/ Ar/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/ Ar/005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kedida Gamela (Gamlea)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1970</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ged/005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gedio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wonago</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1770</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alabana tembar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1630</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ged/06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gedio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wonago</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1610</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wancharo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamogofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gofa (Tolla)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1340</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Gofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arba minch (Bunne-1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2070</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Gofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kucha (Bunne-3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dalle (Gellawcho)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ar/006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ar/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woilita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ar/061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ar/062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamo Ggofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonke (Arfa-01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2070</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ar/027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dale (Genticha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dale (Midasho)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dale (Ouwisho)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dale (Adameado)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ji/046/87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jim 04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jima (JRC)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Si/007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sidama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dale (Wnedu)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1940</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dwoyde (Oha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dgalle (Arkiya)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2200</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >36</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dgalle (Gassa)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1950</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Da/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dauro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mareka (Dorsita)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1580</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Da/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dauro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Konta (Gebiche)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1900</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka (Gaffela)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1870</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ke/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kembata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hadero (Makawa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ge/007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gedio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1590</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/GG/008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamogofa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonke (Afra-2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1900</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wolayita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dwoyde (Wiyacha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sasiga (Gudina)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1750</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diga (Msreta)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1650</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sasiga (Haro)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1750</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diga (Lalo)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1650</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ji/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ji/003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diga (Dhoknuma)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1650</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wog/005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Wolega</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diga (Roba)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1650</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ji/004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kokate (Cheyae, woncharo)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodo zuria (Oha 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1900</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodo zuria (Wdela 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1850</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodo zuria (Oha 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1860</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Omo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodo zuria Chocha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1850</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Areka Research Center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1780</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Ge/002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gedio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wonago (Ganticho)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1770</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw/Wo/003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gedio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wonago (Nifo)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1770</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>The identified Dioscorea species were subjected to qualitative morphological characterization. The qualitative morphological characterizations were carried out to determine the level of variability and the relationship among accessions using IPGRI/IITA descriptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref8">8</xref>]. Characters were observed for five different healthy plants per accession. The color aspect of the plant was recorded using Munsell color chart for plant tissues. The farmers perception were taken at the time of collection and sensory evaluation during harvesting for both boiled (eight characters) and un-boiled yam tubers.</p><p>The total forty five morphological characters were recorded at the time of young, flowering, maturity stage of the plant and at the time of harvesting using IPGR descriptor list [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref8">8</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The collected raw data were subjected to statistical analysis using computer software packages for the diversity and relatedness study among yams (Dioscorea spp.).</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The qualitative morphological characters and their score code of young and mature leaf, stem and tuber of yam (Dioscorea spp.) germplasms collected during field experiment</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growth stage of the plant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Score code/Descriptor state</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Young leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Yellowish, 2 Pale green, 3 Dark green, 3 Purplish green, 4 Purple, 99 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf margin colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Purple, 3 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vein colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Yellowish, 2 Green, 3 Pale purple, 4 Purple, 99 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Green with purple edges, 3 Purple, 99 Others (specify in descriptor 7.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole wing colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Green with purple edges, 3 Purple, 99 Others (specify in descriptor 7.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf hairiness upper/lower part position of widest part of leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Green with purple edges, 3 Purple,</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Mature leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Third upper, 2 Middle, 3 Third lower</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence and presence of waxiness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Absent, 1 Present</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hairiness of petiole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Sparse, 5 Dense</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 All green with purple base, 2 All green with purple leaf junction, 3 All green with purple at both ends, 4 All purplish green with purple base, 5 All purplish green with purple leaf junction, 6 All purplish green with purple at both ends, 7 Green, 8 Purple 9 Brownish green, 10 Brown, 11 Dark brown 99 Other (specify in descriptor 7.7 Notes)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mature leaf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole wing colour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Green, Green with purple edge, Purple, Other</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Young stem colour after emergence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Purple green, 3 Brownish green, 4 Dark Brown, 5 Purple, 99 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence or presence barky patches</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Absent, 1 Present</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence or presence of spines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Absent, 1 Present</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Low, 5 Intermediate, 7 High</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Simple, 2 Compound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leatherness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 No, 1 Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxiness of upper/lower surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Waxy upper surface, 2 Waxy lower surface, 3 Both</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf apex shape</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Obtuse, 2 Acute, 3 Emarginate, 99 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Position of widest part of leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Third upper, 2 Middle, 3 Lower</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance b/n lobs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 No measurable distance, 5 Intermediate, 9 Very distant</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upward folding of leaf along main vein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Weak, 7 Strong</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dawn ward folding of leaf along main vein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Few, 7 Many</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Mature stem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Dwarf, 2 Shrub like, 3 Climbing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Twining habit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 No, 1 Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Twining direction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Clockwise (climbing to the left), 2 Antilock Wise (climbing to the right)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mature stem colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Green, 2 Purplish green, 3 Brownish green, 4 Dark brown, 5 Purple, 99 Other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >Underground Tubers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corm size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Small, 5 Intermediate, 7 Large</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence or presence of underground tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 no, 1 Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corm type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Regular, 2 Transversally elongated, 3 Branched</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tendency of tuber to branch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Slightly branched, 5 Branched, 7 Highly branched</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ab/pr of cracks on tuber surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Sparse, 7 Dense</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spines of roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Few, 7 Many</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root on the tuber surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 No, 3 Few, 7 Many</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of root on the tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Few, 7 Many</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uniformity of flesh colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 No, 1 Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maturity tuber after emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Up to 6 months, 2 7 - 8 months, 3 9 - 10 months</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Characters Evaluated by Farmers</title><p>Fifteen farmers were selected from Gedio zone (Wonago district) near the research site. Following their consent an introduction was given to them by the researcher on the sensory parameters of interest. Yam tubers from each accession were taken washed and boiled by farmers as their method of preparation. The sensory values decided by farmers were recorded by the researcher as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> using IPGRI descriptor list.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Characters assessed by farmers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Character</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Score code/Descriptor state</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stickiness of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Not sticky 2 Sticky, 3 Very sticky</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flavor of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Not acceptable, 1 Acceptable, 2 Very acceptable</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence/presence moisture on cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Absent , 1 Present</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitterness of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Not bitter, 1 Bitter, 2 Very bitter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweetness of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 Not sweet, 1 Sweet, 2 Very sweet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Appearance of tuber after cooking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 Poor, 5 Fair , 7 Good</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color of tuber after cooking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 White not colored, 9 Highly colored</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall assessment of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Low , 5 Intermediate, 7 High</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis for Morphological Characterization</title><p>Statistical analysis was done using Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.02 NTSYpc software program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref9">9</xref>] and the data reduction function of SPSS for windows (version 12.0, 2003). The standardized data for qualitative characters were subjected to multivariate analysis and principal component analysis to identify the most discriminating morphological characters. The matrix of similarity was generated based on distance coeficents. The distance matrix was subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis using Shan through an un-weighted pair group method average (UPGMA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref10">10</xref>]. Cophenetic value (ultrametric) matrix was used to compute the cophenetic correlation as a measure of goodness of fit.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Morphological Variability Based Species Identification</title><p>Based on presence and absence of spines on stems and roots, number of male and female inflorescence, stem length, twining direction, and flesh color sixty yam germplams from ten major growing areas of the country were grouped into six species namely D. alata, D. bulbifera, D. abyssinica, D. praehensilis, D. rotundata and D. cayenensis. The two species D. rotundata and D. cayenensis were observed to have 1 - 3 male inflorescences per spike and after cutting revealed white and yelowish flesh color. During this study the yellowish colour was grouped to D. cayenensis whereas the white flesh colour was grouped to D. rotundata as indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d) respectively.</p><p>The species D. alata was differentiated from other groups based on its four angled stem. The average stem length of this species under study were 10 m long, it had different tuber shape apperance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f)). Whereas D. abyssinica had an average climber stem of 2 - 5 m and the number of male infloresences observed was 3 - 6. Under this study most of the D. abyssinica species had male infloresecence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Spines were observed on stem of this species. Whereas, the average stem length recorded from D. praehensilis was 10 m and spines were observed both on roots and stems of this species. The number of male and female inflorescences observed in D. praehensilis was 3 - 5 and 1 - 2 respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e)). Generaly D. abyssinica and D. praehensilis revealed three types of flesh color which were purplish colour, a central white colour surrounded by purplish colour and the mixure of white and purplish colours (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e)).</p><p>The species whose stem was climbing to the left or in a clock wise direction was grouped in to D. bulbifera (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> (c)). The average stem length of this species was 3 - 10 m with 3 - 5 male inflorescence. Its areal tuber showed both white and purple color. While, all the other species under study twining direction was anti clock wise.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Morphological Diversity Data of Yam Determined Based on Cluster Analysis</title><p>Among 45 qualitative morphological characters recorded on six Dioscorea species namely D. abyssinica, D. praeihensilis, D. cayenensis, D. rotundata, D. alata and D. bulbifera 12 traits did not reveal phenotypic variation among the 60 yam germplasm studied. These traits were not included for clustering and principal component analysis. Based on the relative magnitude of distance similarity matrix and dendrogram using Shan UPGMA cluster analysis, all sixty yam genotypes included in the study were grouped into five clusters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>At the similarity distance 1.81, the dendrogram identified three clusters 1 and 2 which contain eight to eighteen accessions per cluster (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Cluster 1 is the second largest group and contains 18 yam accessions with green mature petiole colour. Cluster 2 contained accessions with pale purple young petiole colour, green mature petiole colour, high leaf density, presence of cracks on tuber surface, intermediate corm size, highly coloured tuber after cooking and cooked tuber sweetness.</p><p>The dendrogram at the similarity distance 1.6 identified clusters 3. This cluster group is characterized by dark brown stem color after emergency, green mature petiole color, intermediate corm size and presence of cracks on the cooked tuber.</p><p>The dendrogram with similarity distance 1.71 identifies one cluster group 4. This cluster is the largest and composed of 19 accessions. This group is characterized</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Clustering groups of six different Ethiopian Dioscorea species derived from distance similarity coefficient based on their morphological diversity data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cluster name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sub clusters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of accessions</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Species name and their frequencies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phenotypic similarity within clusters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >green mature petiole colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. preahensilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. cayenensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. alata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >pale purple young petiole colour, green mature petiole colour, high leaf density, presence of cracks on tuber surface, intermediate corm size and cooked tuber sweetness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. preahensilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >dark brown stem color after emergency, green mature petiole color, intermediate corm size and presence of cracks on cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. cayenensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >yellow mature petiole color and green stem color and absence of cracks on the tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. preahensilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. cayenensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C5a</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >yellow mature petiole color, green stem color and twining direction to left , intermediate corm size and small tuber width at middle part</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >absence of barky patches on the stem, green stem color, yellow mature petiole color, small tuber width at middle part, absence of tuber cracks, late maturity group, white flesh tuber color and twining direction to right</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>by yellow mature petiole color, green stem color and absence of cracks on the tuber. Cluster 5 contained two cluster groups cluster 5a and cluster 5b. Cluster 5a is a group of D. bulbifera species with yellow mature petiole color and green stem color. Cluster 5b is a group of D. rotundata composed from three yam accessions. This group is characterized by absence of barky patches on the stem, green stem color, and yellow mature petiole color, small tuber width at middle part, absence of tuber cracks, late maturity group and white tuber color after cooking. In this analysis the cophenetic correlation coefficient result was r = 80 which revealed the efficiency of the dendrogram.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Clustering pattern of yam (Dioscorea spp.) accessions derived from the similarity matrix of 60 accessions based on their morphological traits</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cluster name (Sub clusters)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of accessions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accessions included (SN)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Origin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1, 3, 6, 7, 11, 9, 12, 16, 17, 20, 2319, 2, 5, 3, 15, 4541)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica D. preahensilis D. rotundata D. cayenensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Ji, Wo, Kf, Ga, Ga, Ar, Wo, Wo, Ga, Si, Ar, Ga, Ge, Kf, Ge, Ge, Wo, Ge, Wo, Wo)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(14, 43, 48, 22, 52, 36, 49, 37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. alata D. rotundata D. bulbifera D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Ji, Ar, Ji, Wo, Ji, Da)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(39, 40, 44, 46, 47, 50, 51)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. abyssinica D. preahensilis D. rotundata D. cayenensis D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Wo, Km, Wg, Wg, Wg, Wg, Wg)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4, 8, 10, 24, 35, 42, 18, 26, 27, 25, 21, 33, 38, 28, 58, 29, 30, 31, 32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. cayenensis D. rotundata D. bulbifera D. preahensilis D. abyssinica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Ga, Ga, Ar, Ar, Si, GaGa, Ga, Ar, Ar, Si, Da, Si, Un, Si, Si, Si, Ji)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C5 (C5a) (C5b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(34, 53, 55, 59, 60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. bulbifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Wo, Wo, Wo, Ge, Ge)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(54, 56, 57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D. rotundata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Wo, Wo, Wo)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Ji-Jima, Ga-Gamogofa, , Da-Dauro, Wo-Wolayita, Si-Sidama, Ar-Areka, Km-Kembata, Ge-Gedio, Wg-Wolega, Kf-Kefa.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Principal Component Analysis</title><p>The PCA results revealed that the first axis largely accounted for the variation among yam accessions (24.87%) followed by the second axis (14.96%) and third axis (11.63%). The first five axes with eighteen values greater than unity accounted for the total variations among 33 characters describing 69.31% and the first three axes accounted for 51.48% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). Traits with comparatively greater weight in PC1 and PC3 were young petiole color. Correspondingly greater weight in PC2 was color of tuber after cooking. Similarly, flesh color at the lower part of tuber and flavor of cooked tuber resulted in larger weight in the first three principal components while tendency of tuber to branch gave greater weight to the first two principal components.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Eigen values, variability percentage and accumulated variation with respect to five character in 60 yam accessions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >SN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Characters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Eigen values</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variation of each component (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accumulated variation (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf margin color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vein color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >young petiole color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >young petiole wing color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: SN = Serial number.</p><table-wrap-group id="7"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> First 3 principal components (PCs) scores of 33 morphological traits across yam genotypes collected from 11 major growing areas of Ethiopia</title></caption><table-wrap id="7_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >SN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Traits</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PC1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PC2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PC3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0813</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1160</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf margin color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0434</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vein color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1859</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1136</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Young petiole color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Young petiole wing color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0784</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0530</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem color after emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1029</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem spines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0201</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0241</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mature petiole color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1752</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leathernes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0644</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0008</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxiness upper surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1090</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between lobes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0665</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upward folding of leaf along main vein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1774</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dawn ward folding of leaf along main vein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0398</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >15</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Twining direction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0155</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0532</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0265</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0464</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corm size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0638</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root spines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0496</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2855</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over all acceptability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1587</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0854</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tendency of tuber to branch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3635</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence and presence cracks on tuber surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0445</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots on tuber surface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2152</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of roots on the tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1962</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2392</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stickiness of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0341</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flavor of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.4546</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5504</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6893</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence or presence of moisture on cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0348</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0067</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitterness of cooked tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0221</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >After cooking appearance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2617</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color of tuber after cooking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2634</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over all acceptability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1703</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flesh color lower part tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.4399</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uniformity of flesh color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0792</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maturity after emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0605</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Note: SN = Serial number; *Bolded values revealed highly correlated morphological traits to respective principal components.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title>Morphological Characterization<p>Morphological characterization is advisable to be taken as the first step before biochemical or molecular studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref11">11</xref>]. In the present study, tuber flesh colour and tuber shape revealed differences among different species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Similarly, it is stated that tubers vary greatly in size, colour and shape depending on species, cultivar and environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref14">14</xref>]. In this study, yam tubers of D. praehensilis and D. alata had finger like appearance while tubers of D. rotundata, D. cayenensis and D. abyssinica were long with oval shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). It is also reported that the tuber shape of D. alata is often irregular which increases harvest time and thus is labour intensive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>In the present study pink and red purplish colors were observed in D. abyssinica and D. praehensilis, whereas D. cayenensis and D. alata revealed yellow and white tuber flesh colors respectively. It is indicated that anthocyanins and carotenoids are pigments found in yams (Dioscorea spp.) which give their distinctive tuber flesh colors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref14">14</xref>]. B-carotene and Xanthophyll esters are responsible for the yellow flesh color of D. cayenensis.</p><p>Morphological characterization indicated only one cluster which grouped yam accessions based on their geographic origin where most accessions of Wolega origin were in cluster 3 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). It is supported and recommended that geographic diversity may serve as an indicator of genetic diversity in parental selection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref16">16</xref>]. Yam genotypes of Wolayita origin showed more morphological diversity and were distributed in all clustering groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Earlier studies showed a presence of more morphological diversity in Wolayita yam cultivars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref5">5</xref>]. Species of D. abyssinica, D. rotundata, D. cayenensis and D. praehensilis revealed relatedness. This relationship could be due to the likelihood of D. praehensilis and D. abyssinica being one of the wild parents of several cultivars of D. cayenensis and D. rotundata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>The efficiency of different cluster algorithms can be compared through estimation of the cophenetic correlation coefficient. It is a product moment correlation coefficient measuring agreement between the dissimilarity and similarity indicated by the dendrogram which is output of the dissimilarity and similarity matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref9">9</xref>]. In this analysis the cophenetic correlation coefficient r = 80 revealed the efficiency of the dendrogram.</p><p>In this study, morphological traits that best discriminate between the landraces were young petiole color, flesh color at lower part of tuber, tendency of tuber to branch, color of tuber after cooking and flavor of cooked tuber. In the same way, it was reported that D. alata that scores morphological variability on the first principal component (PC-1) was highly correlated with the characters related to the tuber flesh colours and petiole colour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref17">17</xref>]. Similarly, it was indicated in morphological variability study of Kenyan yam that Pc3 was mainly correlated to characters related to the tuber flesh colour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref18">18</xref>]. It is also showed that the most effectively used characters in classification of D. alata are tuber, leaf and growth characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.104336-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Generally the present study indicated that, the presence of important heritable phenotypic trait of yam to achieve genetic improvement of the crop. Clustering the accessions helped in identifying parents with diverse characters. Most of the morphological variations among the yam genotypes were contributed by young petiole color, tendency of tuber to branch, tuber flesh color at lower part, color of tuber after cooking and flavor of cooked tuber. Hence, these morphological and organoleptic traits can be taken as useful characters for identification of yam cultivars. Morphological characterization of Ethiopian yam accessions showed that Wolayita regions had wide genetic diversity and most yam landraces from Wolega revealed different genetic base. Therefore, it is important to consider yam germplasms from Wolega and Wolayita regions during breeding and improvement activities of the crop.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Rural Capacity Building Project (RCBP) for a financial support during the execution of this experiment. The project was launched by Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoARD). The major aim of the project was to make clients aware of economically viable and environmentally sustainable practices.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bekele, A. and Bekele, E. (2020) Identification of Ethiopian Yam (Dioscorea spp.) Collections and Their Phenotypic Diversity Study. Agricultural Sciences, 11, 1116-1132. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2020.1111073</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.104336-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, D.J., Lu, T.J. and Huang, L.S. (2009) Effect of Endogenous Glycosidase on Stability of Steroidal Saponins in Taiwanese Yam (Dioscorea pseudojaponica yamamoto) during Drying Processes. Food Chemistry, 113, 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organization (1991) Food Outlook. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organization (2015) FAOSTAT Agriculture Database, Agricultural Production, Crops Primary. Yams. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hildebrand, E. (2003) Motives and Opportunities for Domestication: Anthropological Study in Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Anthropological Archeology, 22, 358-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00031-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muluneh, T. (2006) Assessing Diversity in Yams (Dioscorea spp.) from Ethiopia Based on, Morphology, AFLP Markers and Tuber Quality, and Farmers Management of Landraces. Culvillier Verlag, G&amp;#246;ttingen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Westpal, E. (1975) Agricultural System in Ethiopia. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Miège, J. and Sebsebe, D. (1997) Dioscoreaceae. In: Edwards, S., Sebsebe, D. and Hedberg, I., Eds., Flora of Ethiopia and Eriterea, National Herbarium, Biology Department, AAU, Ethiopia, Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala University, Sweden.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Plant Genetic Resource Institute and International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (1997) Description for Yam (Dioscorea spp.). International Institute for Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, International Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rolf, F. (1998) NTSYS-pc—Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sneath, P. and Sokal, R. (1973) Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otoo, E., Akromah, R., Kolesnik, A. and Astedu, R. (2009) Ethno-Botany Morphological Characterization of the Yam Pona Complex in Ghana. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, Vol.9, Cape Town, 28 September-1 October 2009, 407-414.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coursey, D.G. (1967) Yams. An Account of the Nature, Origins, Cultivation and Utilization of the Useful Membersf the Dioscoreacea. Longmans, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onwueme, I. (1978) The Tropical Tuber Crops: Yam, Cassava, Sweet Potato an Cocoyams. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, F. and Ruberté, R. (1976) The Polyphenol of Dioscorea alata (Yam) Tubers Associated with Oxidative Browning. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 24, 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60203a039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lebot, V., Trilles, B., Noyer, J. and Modesto, J. (1998) Genetic Relationship between Dioscorea alata L. Cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45, 499-509.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008603303314</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, B.D. (1990) Plant Breeding: Principles and Methods. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, Ludhiana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasan, S., Ngadin, A., Shah, R. and Mohamad, N. (2008) Morphological Variability of Greater Yam (Dioscorea alata L.) in Malaysia. Plant Genetic Resources, 6, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262108920050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.104336-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mwirigi, P., Kahangi, E., Nyende, A. and Mamati, E. (2009) Morphological Variability within the Kenyan Yam (Dioscorea spp.). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 16, 894-901.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>