<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2020.89004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-103183</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Development and Aging Behaviour of Solvent-Based Polychloroprene Rubber Nano-Adhesive Using Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Awais</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Shahid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohsin</surname><given-names>Saleem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fariz</surname><given-names>Aneeq</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Shoaib Butt</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Malik</surname><given-names>Adeel Umer</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences &amp;amp; Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Polychloroprene (PC) based contact adhesives are widely used in various applications; however, there is a possibility to improve the properties of PC adhesive. Modifications of polymers can enhance the properties of the material, e.g. increase in thermal stability, compatibility, rigidity, physical response, flexibility and improve the polymer process ability. In the current study, improved formulation of solvent-based adhesive was developed, and the properties were further enhanced by the addition of nano-reinforcement of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The addition of nano-reinforcement was optimized to obtain improvement in the bond strength and also to enhance its resistance at a high temperature (~100
  &amp;#176;C). This paper discusses the uniform dispersion of MWCNTs during the synthesis of polychloroprene solvent-based adhesive, thereby improving its structural properties. Incorporation of MWCNTs-solvent-based adhesives resulted in a 20% - 35% improvement in 180
  &amp;#176; peel strength determined on flexible substrates such as canvas, leather. The reinforced based adhesive also exhibited improved thermal stability and weather resistance compared with unreinforced adhesive. The MWCNTs- solvent-based contact adhesives is a potential candidate in an industrially relevant branch of adhesives commonly used in structural applications, e.g., footwear, plastic, leather, automobile, construction industries, etc.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nanocomposite</kwd><kwd> Polychloroprene</kwd><kwd> Adhesive</kwd><kwd> Peel Strength</kwd><kwd> Carbon Nanotubes</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The phenomenon of transferring loads from adherend to adhesive joint is known as adhesion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref1">1</xref>]. Mechanical properties of polymer control the interfacial forces necessary for good adhesion. Sustaining sufficient stresses at the interface is the basis for high adhesion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref2">2</xref>]. There is always intermolecular diffusion taking place between the surfaces joined together by contact adhesives. In any interfusion process, the organic liquid evaporates, thus forming a strong bond between the layers; the bonding starts to take place when two properly layered bonding surfaces are brought closer. Several major parameters play a pivotal role in the auto adhesion to take place. The polymer or binding material must have diffusive properties. Diffusive property of binding material depends on solvent and the polymer used. There are only selective polymers which exhibit excellent auto adhesion properties. Intimate and close contact of the substrate is compulsory for the highest diffusion. Elastic stress and rheology of composition affect the quality of bond strength. When the adhesive is coated correctly on the material and dried in a lap of time under ambient conditions, this time is called open time. Adhesive layer alters all the physical properties in the open time due to evaporation of the solvent, interfacing of polymers, the base of polymer changes and crystallization of binding polymers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref3">3</xref>]. When the open time has been passed, auto adhesion or good adhesive properties of the surfaces can’t be achieved.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Properties of Contact Adhesive</title><p>Contact adhesives are used because of their excellent mechanical properties, high strength, fast setting time, easy applicability and durability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref4">4</xref>]. It can be used as solvent-based as well as water-based depending upon the type of application. In solvent-based technology, the solvent evaporates very quickly from the surface, and very high bond strength is observed, which increases with time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref5">5</xref>]. Some of the properties which affect the strength and its performance are viscosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref6">6</xref>], storage life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref8">8</xref>], working life, tack time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref10">10</xref>], acid acceptance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref11">11</xref>], surface free energy and wettability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref13">13</xref>], etc. Resins are added in contact adhesives formulations to modify viscosity, tack time and strength of adhesive. Resins act as tackifying agent in adhesives. They are available in various colors ranging from transparent to brown. They are soluble in aliphatic, aromatic and organic compounds.</p><p>Phenolic resins are widely used in adhesive formulation; however, many alternatives are now being developed. Modified resins are also used in the adhesive formulation. Tack time is decreased when the resin amount is increased from 80 phr (parts per hundred) to 85 phr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref9">9</xref>]. Solvent-based adhesives are commonly used in packing, automotive, construction, footwear and furniture industries. However, due to safety and environmental issues, chlorinated solvents are banned. Solvents are selected depending on the drying rate and retention time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref14">14</xref>]. Contact adhesives have excellent thermal and electric insulation. They can withstand the temperature of about 130˚C. Uniform stress distribution and lightweight structures can be built by using contact adhesives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref15">15</xref>]. Water-based contact adhesives are gradually replacing solvent-based adhesives, however, they require excessive time to dry, which restrict their applicability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Adhesive bonding is a result of various physio-chemical interactions taking place between materials to be joined and the adhesive. So, adhesive bonding needs some understanding of these processes taking place on the surface of materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref17">17</xref>]. Various theories describing adhesion mechanisms are mechanical interlocking, electrostatic adhesion, diffusion, and surface reaction. However, it is challenging to associate adhesive bonding with a particular theory. Adhesive bonding is the result of the combination of these mechanisms, but the role of each mechanism changes for carious adhesive systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref18">18</xref>]. An essential factor in adhesive bonding is the scale at which adhesive and adherend interaction takes place. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows a rough range of action of a particular mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref8">8</xref>]. Mechanisms of various theories have been explained at numerous references, e.g., a mechanical method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref19">19</xref>], ways to improve mechanical bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref20">20</xref>]; electrostatic theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref21">21</xref>]; weak boundary layer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref22">22</xref>]; diffusion theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref23">23</xref>]; adsorption theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref24">24</xref>] etc.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Polychloroprene Rubber-Based Adhesives</title><p>One of the most critical applications in which Neoprene<sup>&#210;</sup> adhesive finds its place is in shoe industry, for both permanent and temporary sole bonding. However, the early neoprene cement had two problems: 1) discoloration when stored in steel drums and 2) decrease in viscosity when stored for a more extended period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref25">25</xref>]. The discoloration was due to the formation of hydrochloric acid formed by oxidation of Neoprene on ageing. Magnesium oxide and zinc oxide were added in small quantity to prevent the discoloration. However, their addition decreased the viscosity stability of adhesive. Addition of phenolic resin increases the threshold value of the cohesive strength of Neoprene while the former decreased its strength at high temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref26">26</xref>]. The essential requirement for the excellent bond is 1) Proper choice of adhesive; 2) Good joint design; 3) Surface preparation; 4) Wettability; 5) Proper bonding process. According to a few reports, surface treatment is directly proportional to life and service expectancy of any adhesive joint [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref17">17</xref>]. The surface treatment is required to remove any layer of containment</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Theories of adhesion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref8">8</xref>]</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Recent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale of Action</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mechanical Interlocking Electrostatic Diffusion Adsorption/surface reaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mechanical Interlocking Electrostatic Diffusion Wettability Chemical Bonding Weak Boundary Layer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Microscopic Macroscopic Molecular Molecular Atomic Molecular</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>like dirt, grease or oil, which appears to be the surface of substrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref27">27</xref>]. There are multiple ways to clean these surfaces for better wettability, some surface preparation methods: Solvent Cleaning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref28">28</xref>]; Chemical treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref29">29</xref>]; Mechanical treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref5">5</xref>]; Chemical etching [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref30">30</xref>]; Plasma treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref31">31</xref>]; Corona treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref32">32</xref>]; Flame treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref10">10</xref>] etc. A large-scale variety of rubber-based PCA (Polychloroprene adhesives) is available based on cost and end-use. Several components and the mixture of solvents are used to formulate PCA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref33">33</xref>]. End-use of adhesive application having various rate of crystallization of neoprene rubber is also available, which includes neoprene AD, neoprene AC, neoprene blends of polychloroprene and its co-polymers are also used to attain desired properties of adhesive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref34">34</xref>]. Polyphenols, hexamethylenetetramines and condensation products of amines with aldehydes, di-phenyl aniline and polyisocyanates can be used for self-curing of adhesives. Hexamethylenetetramine and paraformaldehyde are used as aldehydes. To increase the vulcanization, process promoters can be added [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref35">35</xref>]. Various functional groups are introduced to increase the strength of multilayer resin products of adhesives. Functional groups are in the form of additives to boost the adhesion strength to resins. Many researchers prefer phenol resins or resins based on cyclopentadiene to improve the gluing properties of the polychloroprene adhesives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref34">34</xref>]. The ageing particularizations of contact adhesives can be affected using resins. The ageing can be increased and decreased using the resins. The resins must be blended with the antioxidants to get the best mechanical properties of the adhesives.</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Nanoscale Reinforcement in Adhesives</title><p>The adhesion properties can be improved by introducing a minute amount of nanoparticles like multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Nano clay and graphene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref36">36</xref>]. A successful dispersion of Nano-fillers (carbon nanotubes, nano-clay, nanofibers) into a matrix of a polymer (thermosetting or thermoplastic) plays an important role. A nanocomposite is a unique combination of improved properties like physical, chemical and mechanical properties. The Nano-fillers have exceptionality due to their size and large surface area over traditional fillers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref37">37</xref>].</p><p>In this research, MWCNTs was added in solvent-based adhesives to increase the mechanical properties of adhesion in different ageing conditions from ambient to high temperature. Peel strength of unreinforced and reinforced based adhesives was investigated and compared it with commercially available adhesives.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Procedure</title><p>Materials used in the formulation of adhesive were: Polychloroprene rubber (Mw. 120,000); Phenolic Resin (Mw. 700); Solvents such as Toluene, Ethyl acetate, Naphtha, DMF (Dimethylformamide); Magnesium oxide (MgO)/Zinc Oxide (ZnO); Antioxidant; Nanofillers as Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs; diameter 10 - 30 nm). All materials were of commercial-grade expect DMF (role) (Sigma Aldrich, 99%). Commercial grade functionalized MWCNTs were procured from Sun Nanotech<sup>&#210;</sup> with a purity of 90%. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> displays the quantities of ingredients used for polychloroprene solvent-base adhesive; the amounts were optimized after multiple iterations.</p><p>Direct dissolving technique was used to carry out the experimentation in the laboratory. After successful tests at a smaller scale, the production was scaled up using an indigenously developed impeller mixing machine with controlled temperature and along with variable low rpm. All ingredients were added one-by-one in a mechanical mixer, and the temperature was gradually increased to 60˚C. The optimized adhesive was given the name “PA-30”. Dispersion of MWCNTs in DMF was performed using ultrasonic bath [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref38">38</xref>]. The dispersed solution was added to already fabricate PCA (Polychloroprene adhesive) during a continuous mechanical mixing. Mixing of adhesive is done until the pale yellow colour of the adhesive changes into greenish colour and developing a nanocomposite adhesive. The whole process took 3 to 4 hours. Schematic diagram of mixing is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>Preparation of Samples for Mechanical Testing<p>Two types of substrates 1) Canvas-to-Canvas and 2) Leather-to-Leather were used for peel testing as per ASTM standard D903 (2017). The adhesives were applied using a brush and a doctor blade and allowed to almost before joining together and gentle pressing using a roller. 180˚ angle peel testing was performed as per ASTM standard D3330, using a UTM.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> displays the effect of MWCNTs’ concentration on peel strength of the Nano composite adhesive. There was a gradual increase in peel strength up to a certain amount of MWCNTs (0-1%) followed by a stable rather a decreasing trend. The enhancement in strength was due to compatibility of the MWCNTs with the resin and the adhesive system. In both cases i.e. canvas-to-canvas and leather-to-leather substrates, maximum peel strength was obtained by incorporating ≈ 0.8% MWCNTs.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The optimized formulation of solvent-based adhesive “PA-30”</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sr. No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chemicals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parts per hundred</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antioxidant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethyl Acetate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toluene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphtha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, a decreasing trend in peel strength after a maximum value, was presumably due to diminution in cohesive forces between adhesive and substrate; it may also be an effect of poor wetting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref6">6</xref>]. Another possible reason for the decrease in peel strength could be self-agglomeration of CNTs at higher contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref39">39</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> displays a comparison of the amount of improvement in peel strengths of the unreinforced and reinforced adhesive, indicating a significant enhancement in peel strength on canvas-to-canvas and leather-to-leather substrates. In canvas-to-canvas substrate, peel strength improved up to 35% while on leather-to-leather substrate the rise was 21%, under optimized conditions.</p><p>The graph demonstrates that the presence of MWCNTs significantly increased the bonding capability of the adhesive. Presumably, the nanotubes caused reinforcement within the adhesive by either possible crack bridging or by crack deflection mechanism which did not allow the crack to propagate at lower loading condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref39">39</xref>].</p><p>The (PA-30) unreinforced adhesive formulation showed satisfactory performance in normal environmental conditions; however, it exhibited degradation issues when exposed to humidity, temperature, chemicals, seawater and mechanical loading during service.</p><p>The role of MWCNTs was of significant consideration to overcome these ageing conditions, by increasing adhesive stiffness, thermal stability and fracture durability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref9">9</xref>]. The reinforced Nano-adhesive (PA-N11) was formulated using MWCNTs to overcome these conditions. Due to the presence of MWCNTs, the adhesive performance was significantly higher in relatively aggressive environments. The bond strength, thermal stability and liquid barrier properties were improved due to incorporation of highly dispersed MWCNTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref40">40</xref>].</p><p>The shelf life of the adhesive was estimated by studying ageing under ambient environment. Peel strengths of the unreinforced and reinforced adhesives were determined after shelving at ambient condition for up to 4 months. The data were also compared with commercially available adhesives (Elephant<sup>&#210;</sup>, Dolphin<sup>&#210;</sup>, Samad ultra<sup>&#210;</sup>, Camel<sup>&#210;</sup>) of the same category, under similar conditions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> show a graphical comparison of the effect of ageing on peel strengths, tested on canvas-to-canvas and leather-to-leather substrates, respectively.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the peel strengths of unreinforced and reinforced nanocomposite adhesives, and commercially available adhesives of the same category. PA-30 and commercial adhesives lost their adhesion strength to a mentionable value;</p><p>however, PA-N11 (nanocomposite adhesive) displayed significantly higher performance; the mechanical properties were enhanced with a minimum decrease in peel strength after ageing.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows peel strengths data of various adhesives after the bonds were exposed to of 100˚C. It is believed that the network of crosslinked phenolic resin present in adhesives is usually affected by high temperature. Thermal stability of PA-N11 was enhanced due to the presence of nanotubes which helped to resist high-temperature environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref9">9</xref>]. The flexibility of the adhesive system was</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of various adhesives under the ambient condition for four month</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adhesive</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Canvas-to-Canvas</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leather-to-Leather</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >------</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Fall in peel strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Fall in peel strength</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-N11*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elephant<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Samad ultra<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dolphin<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Camel<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Addition of 1% MWCNTs with adhesive.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of various adhesives under ageing at 100˚C for 24 hours</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adhesive</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Canvas-to-Canvas</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leather-to-Leather</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Fall in peel strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Fall in peel strength</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-N11*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elephant<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Samad ultra<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dolphin<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Camel<sup>&#210;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Addition of 1% MWCNTs with adhesive.</p><p>essential to operate at high-temperature environment. PA-N11 had better flexibility at high-temperature environment. PA-N11 had a minimal amount of MWCNTs, which provided a better crosslinking network to surfaces of the substrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref40">40</xref>]. Mismatch of properties leads to failure of adhesive bond strength even at low loads and temperature. PA-N11 showed excellent thermal stability in ageing conditions owing to the existence of the MWCNTs crosslinking network.</p><p>It is generally known that an adhesive joint is deteriorated when exposed to saltwater since the ability for the diffusion of water increases by the ingress of Cl− and Na+ in the adhesive joints, resulting in poor durability of the joint [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103183-ref42">42</xref>]. The various adhesive joints were exposed to 3.5% saltwater at ambient temperature for 24 hours, and the peel strengths were determined. The testing was repeated after every month for for a duration of three months to validate the performance of the adhesives after prolonged shelving. The data is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. Reinforced adhesive showed better resistance compared with unreinforced adhesives including commercial counterparts. The resistance against the corrosive nature of the solution was due to the crosslinking network of MWCNTs in the adhesive. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> summarizes fall in peel strengths as a result of immersion saltwater at ambient temperature for 24 hours.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of adhesives under ageing in 3.5% saltwater for 24 hours</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adhesive</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Canvas-to-Canvas</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leather-to-Leather</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Fall in peel strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Fall in peel strength</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PA-N11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elephant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Samad ultra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dolphin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Camel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Incorporation of MWCNTs in the solvent-based adhesive successfully improves the bond strength of adhesive joint on flexible substrates. The formulations of PA-30 (unreinforced adhesive) exhibited improvement in 180˚ peel strengths on canvas and leather substrates, up to 57 N/mm and 67 N/mm, respectively. The formulation of PA-N11 (1% MWCNTs), demonstrated an enhancement in peel strength up to 77 N/mm on canvas and 81 N/mm on leather substrates respectively. The improvement in peel strength was 35% on canvas and 21% on leather substrates as compared to unreinforced adhesive. The optimized unreinforced adhesive displayed a 25% - 50% increase in peel strength compared with commercial adhesives used for investigation. The optimized reinforced adhesive showed 46% - 64% increase in peel strength compared with commercial adhesives investigated. Fall in peel strength of unreinforced adhesive after 4-month shelving at the ambient environment, was 8% - 10%, whereas the reinforced adhesives showed a decrease of 2% - 3%. Fall in peel strength of unreinforced adhesive after 24 hours’ immersion in 3.5% sodium chloride solution was 12% - 17%, whereas the reinforced adhesives showed a decrease of 4% - 6%.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the Pakistan Science Foundation financial grant to carry out this research work under Grant No.089, April 2019.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Awais, M., Shahid, M., Saleem, M., Aneeq, F., Butt, M.S. and Umer, M.A. (2020) Development and Aging Behaviour of Solvent-Based Polychloroprene Rubber Nano-Adhesive Using Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 8, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2020.89004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.103183-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, K., Shen, H.F., Zhang, X.Y., Lan, R.H. and Chen, H.Q. (2009) Preparation and Properties of a Waterborne Contact Adhesive Based on Polychloroprene Latex and Styrene-Acrylate Emulsion Blend. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 23, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856108X344658</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, H.R. (2000) Adhesion between Polymers and Other Substances—A Review of Bonding Mechanisms, Systems and Testing. Materials Forum, 24, 49-58. 
https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=2089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kozuh, Z., Kralj, S. and Cvirn, Z. (1997) Advantages and Application Possibilities of Adhesive Bonding. Promet-Traffic &amp; Transportation, 9, 33-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barry, C.P., Morose, G.J., Begin, K., Atwater, M. and Hansen, C.J. (2017) The Identification and Screening of Lower Toxicity Solvents for Contact Adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 78, 174-181.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baldan, A. (2004) Adhesively-Bonded Joints and Repairs in Metallic Alloys, Polymers and Composite Materials: Adhesives, Adhesion Theories and Surface Pretreatment. Journal of Materials Science, 39, 1-49.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marshall, S.J., Bayne, S.C., Baier, R., Tomsia, A.P. and Marshall, G.W. (2010) A Review of Adhesion Science. Dental Materials, 26, e11-e16.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gierenz, G. and Karmann, W. (2001) Adhesives and Adhesive Tapes. Wiley-VCH-GMBH, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527612802</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebnesajjad, S. (2008) Adhesive Technology Handbook. 2nd Edition, William Andrew, Norwich, 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin-Martinez, J.M. (2002) Rubber Base Adhesives. Adhesion Science and Engineering, 2, 573-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451140-9/50013-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L., Hu, J. and Athanasiou, K.A. (2009) The Role of Tissue Engineering in Articular Cartilage Repair and Regeneration. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 37, 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v37.i1-2.10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paiva, R.M.M., Marques, E.A.S., da Silva, F.M.L. and Aran-Ais, F. (2015) Adhesives in the Footwear Industry. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 230, 357-374.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715602441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shull, K.R. (2002) Contact Mechanics and the Adhesion of Soft Solids. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 36, 1-45.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00039-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Good, R.J. (1992) Contact Angle, Wetting, and Adhesion: A Critical Review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 6, 1269-1302.  
https://doi.org/10.1163/156856192X00629</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tong, Q.K., Markley, D.L., Frederickson, G., Kuder, R. and Lu, D. (1999) Conductive Adhesives with Stable Contact Resistance and Superior Impact Performance. 1999 Proceedings 49th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36299), San Diego, 347-352.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hartshorn, S.R. (1986) Structural Adhesives: Chemistry and Technology. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7781-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Archer, B. (1998) Water Based Contact Adhesives—New Developments. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 18, 15-18.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(97)00061-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kim, T.H. (2014) Bonding. In: Laperrière, L. and Reinhart, G., Eds., CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, The International Academy for Production Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pizzi, A. and Mittal, K.L. (2017) Handbook of Adhesive Technology. 3rd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ungureanu, D., Taranu, N., Lupasteanu, V., Rosu, A. and Mihai, P. (2016) The Adhesion Theories Applied to Adhesively Bonded Joints of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Elements. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, Constructions, Architecture Section, 62, 37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, M. (1999) Rubber Technology. Springer, Berlin.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2925-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derjaguin, B.V., Churaev, N.V. and Muller, V.M. (1987) Forces near Interfaces. Springer, Berlin, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6639-4_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Persson, B.N.J. and Scaraggi, M. (2014) Theory of Adhesion: Role of Surface Roughness. Journal of Chemical Physics, 141, Article ID: 124701.  
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lipatov, Y.S., Jennings, B.R., Basedow, A.M. and Ebert, K. (1977) Physical Chemistry. Springer, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, S., Gu, L. and Gibson, R. (2001) Nondestructive Detection of Weak Joints in Adhesively Bonded Composite Structures. Composite Structures, 51, 63-71.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00125-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carothers, W.H., Williams, I., Collins, A.M. and James, E.K. (1931) Acetylene Polymers and Their Derivatives. II. A New Synthetic Rubber: Chloroprene and its Polymers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 53, 4203-4225.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01362a042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irving, S. (1990) Handbook of Adhesives. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, Springer, US, Vol. 104, No. 800. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0671-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pocius, A.V. (1986) Fundamentals of Structural Adhesive Bonding. In: Structural Adhesives, Springer US, Boston, 23-68.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7781-8_2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wypych, G. (2014) Solvent Use in Various Industries: Asphalt Compounding. In: Handbook of Solvents, Second Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, 13-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pizzi, A. and Mittal, K.L. (2019) Wood Adhesives. Taylor &amp; Francis, Abingdon-on-Thames. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203733721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wingfield, J.R.J. (1993) Treatment of Composite Surfaces for Adhesive Bonding. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 13, 151-156.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noeske, M., Degenhardt, J., Strudthoff, S. and Lommatzsch, U. (2004) Plasma Jet Treatment of Five Polymers at Atmospheric Pressure: Surface Modifications and the Relevance for Adhesion. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 24, 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molitor, P., Barron, V. and Young, T. (2001) Surface Treatment of Titanium for Adhesive Bonding to Polymer Composites: A Review. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 21, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodrigues, S.B., Petzhold, C.L., Gamba, D., Leitune, V.C.B. and Collares, F.M. (2018) Acrylamides and Methacrylamides as Alternative Monomers for Dental Adhesives. Dental Materials, 34, 1634-1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouvet, G., Cohendoz, S., Feaugas, X., Touzain, S. and Mallarino, S. (2017) Microstructural Reorganization in Model Epoxy Network during Cyclic Hygrothermal Ageing. Polymer, 122, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krzeminska, S. and Rzymski, W.M. (2013) Thermodynamic Affinity of Elastomer-Solvent System and Barrier Properties of Elastomer Materials in Adhesive Systems. Acta Physica Polonica A, 124, 146-150.  
https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.124.146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Font, R., Sabater, M.C. and Martínez, M.A. (2001) Reduction of Solvent Content in Toluene-Neoprene Adhesives and in Acetone-Polyurethane Adhesives. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 15, 1677-1693.  
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610152715719</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wan, Y., Gong, L., Tang, L., Wu, L. and Jiang, J. (2014) Composites: Part A Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites Filled with Silane-Functionalized Graphene Oxide. International Journal of Polymer Science, 64, 79-89.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Razavi, S.M.J., Ayatollahi, M.R., Majidi, H.R. and Berto, F. (2018) A Strain-Based Criterion for Failure Load Prediction of Steel/CFRP Double Strap Joints. Composite Structures, 206, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhai, L.L., Ling, G.P.&amp;#195;. and Wang, Y.W. (2007) Effect of Nano-Al2O3 on Adhesion Strength of Epoxy Adhesive and Steel. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robaidi, A.A., Anagreh, N. and Massadeh, S. (2011) The Effect of Different Surface Pretreatment Methods on Nano-Adhesive Application in High Strength Steel and Aluminum Bonding. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 64, 79-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knox, E.M. and Cowling, M.J. (2000) A Rapid Durability Test Method for Adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 20, 201-208.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00045-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103183-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, C., Huang, Y.D., Xv, H.Y. and Liu, W.B. (2004) The Durability of Adhesive/Carbon-Carbon Composites Joints in Salt Water. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 24, 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.01.001</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>