<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1106710</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-103126</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Rate of Use of Female Condoms in Sex Professionals in the City of Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Christophe Bukasa Tshilonda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alphonsine</surname><given-names>Kabwe Tshibanda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Kituta Katambue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Godet</surname><given-names>Kalonda Kabemba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>Kabemba Kabemba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Crispin</surname><given-names>Kasendue Ngoyi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patrice</surname><given-names>Kimpitu Kifwame</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mabuisha</surname><given-names>Kikudi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cherubin</surname><given-names>Ngongo Kitengie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fidélie</surname><given-names>Kamonga Mulenda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ngoyi</surname><given-names>Eza Ngoyi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sebatien</surname><given-names>Kitengie Kapafule</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christophe</surname><given-names>Kalengo Nsomue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>André</surname><given-names>Eshiba Kasongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Emile</surname><given-names>Tshiminyi Koloy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Kabinda, Kabinda, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Tshofa, Tshofa, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Luabao, Lubao, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Mbujimayi, Mbujimayi, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>University of Kabinda, Kabinda, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Official University of Mbujimayi, Mbujimayi, DRC</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    Objectives: The general objective is to contribute to the promotion of the protection of professionals against STIs. Methodology: The study is quantitative of descriptive correlational type. Data were collected cross-sectionally using a questionnaire from May 01, 2019 to July 01, 2019 from sex workers living in target neighborhoods. Our study population consists of female sex workers from the above-mentioned neighborhoods, while our sample is 122 obtained on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Compared to the condom use rate: the level of use is low, because only 42.62% have already used these condoms. Regarding the links between different characteristics of sex workers and the use of female condoms: age between 20 and 29, lack of other work, income less than 50,000 FC, seniority in the work of less than 12 years, the fact of not having suffered from an STI, the fact of not having a partner with STI and the ignorance of a case of death following AIDS, are associated with low use female condoms; because their p (value) is less than 0.05. Conclusion: The cases of STIs and unwanted pregnancies in the midst of sex workers are real problems that deserve special attention, since they bear witness to the correct level of condom use. Although increasing in recent years, condom use remains low compared to estimated needs. Likewise, there is still very little applied research focused on the level of condom use among diverse populations, and more particularly among sex workers. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Female Condom</kwd><kwd> Contraception</kwd><kwd> Sexually Transmitted Diseases</kwd><kwd> Use Rate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The female condom is a recent medical device, intended for contraception and for the prevention of infections transmitted by heterosexual way [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Its effectiveness depends on the quality of its use. But Pearl’s index, or number of unwanted pregnancies observed per 100 women for twelve months, is 5 in optimal use and 21 in current use, against 3 and 14 respectively for the male condom. Some studies, covering only six months, report lower rates of unwanted pregnancies in current use (between 2.6 and 9.5 pregnancies observed per 100 women) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>They must be used regularly and correctly to achieve these high levels of protection against HIV. When condoms fail to protect people from STIs/HIV, it is usually due to improper or improper use of these condoms, more than failure of the product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In DRC, specifically in KANANGA, The non-use of condoms by sex workers in the Demba Health Zone remains a major challenge for public health actors. The use of condoms by this group has been estimated at 36%. Appropriate measures targeting the main identified determinants and targeting higher risk groups could effectively reduce the magnitude of the problem in this rural environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Locally, our finding in healthcare settings shows an increase in STI cases and the occurrence of unwanted pregnancies among sex workers, something that caught our attention to assess the level of use of female condoms by those concerned.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>The study is quantitative, of a descriptive correlational type. It seeks to estimate the level of use of female condoms by sex workers as well as the factors influencing this use in the city of Mbuji-Mayi.</p><p>The data were collected cross-sectionally using a questionnaire over a period from 01 May 2019 to 01 July 2019 from sex workers living in the target neighborhoods where a large number of these women reside, namely:</p><p>Municipality of Dibindi: Latin Quarter, Monzo Quarter and Ngandajika Quarter.</p><p>Municipality of la Muya: Kajiba and Batetela district.</p><p>Municipality of Bipemba: QuarierKanshi and Bipemba.</p><p>Our study population consists of female sex workers from the above-mentioned neighborhoods, while our sample is 122 obtained on the basis of the following criteria:</p><p>1) Inclusion criteria:</p><p>Reside in the target neighborhoods;</p><p>Being present on the day of the investigation;</p><p>Accepting to participate in the study and answering the questionnaire.</p><p>2) Exclusion criteria</p><p>Excluded from the study are female sex workers who do not meet the above-mentioned inclusion criteria.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Results of Descriptive Analysis</title><p>This <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows us that the age groups of 20 - 29 years (36.89%) and 30 - 39 years (37.70%) are the most represented among sex workers, i.e. the average age is from 32.8279 &#177; 8.9227; the commune of dibindi leads with 49.18%; 66.49% have no other job; the majority live in a state of celibacy (31.97%) and separated (36.01%); 42.62% are at the primary level; 60.66% have a monthly income below 50,000 FC; 95.90% are used to taking toxic substances such as Hemp, Alcohol, Psychotropics; 69.67% have a seniority of 2 to 11 years in sex work; 19.67% do not belong to a religious confection.</p><p>We see in this <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> that all sex workers have already heard of female condoms; 63.93% received the information during the HIV awareness campaign; Only 42.62% have already used these condoms; of this proportion, 71.16% use only occasionally; respectively, they put forward as reasons for use: Means of contraception (07.70%), Means of protection against STIs (44.23%), Means of protection against HIV/AIDS (48.07); 82.69% use only with an occasional partner. Among the proportion who do not use condoms, 61.41% say that it is expensive and less available in pharmacies and 90.98% do not know not the point of sale of these condoms.</p><p>Regarding the Characteristics prompting the need for female condom use by sex workers, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, 86.07% have already been tested for HIV; 40.98% admit having suffered from an STI; 17.21% have already had a partner with IST; 90.98% recognize the existence of HIV and its sexual transmission; 44.26% say they have experienced a death from AIDS.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Results of Bivariate Analysis</title><p>In view of this <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, we note that the association between the socio-demographic characteristics of sex workers and the use of female condoms has revealed the age between 20 and 29 years, the lack of another job, the income</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of sex workers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Categories</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Workforce n = 122</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29 years old 30 - 39 years old 40 - 49 years old 50 and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 46 27 04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.89 37.70 22.13 3.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8279 &#177; 8.9227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commune</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bimpemba Dibindi Muya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 60 31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.41 49.18 25.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without other work Factory Girl Official</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 40 01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.49 32.79 0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single Widow Separated civil union</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 39 44 07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.97 26.23 36.01 05.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No level Primary Secondary Higher and university</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 52 38 05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.13 42.62 31.15 04.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 50,000 FC 50,000 FC and more</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.66 39.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxic habits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp Alcohol Psychotropics Take nothing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 60 05 05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.62 49.18 04.10 04.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seniority in work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 1 year 2 - 11 years 12 and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 85 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.66 69.67 19.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catholic Protestant Revival Church I do not pray</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 26 46 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.31 21.31 37.70 19.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Less 50,000 FC, Work tenure under 12 are associated with the low use of female condoms; because their p (value) is less than 0.05.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, by analyzing the association between knowledge about</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Knowledge of sex workers on the female condom and its use</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Categories</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Workforce n = 122</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have heard of the female condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122 000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Information opportunity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >During HIV awareness Friends and family circle Sexual partner Nursing staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 14 01 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.93 11.48 23.77 00.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have already used the female condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.62 57.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency of use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Every time you have sex Occasionally</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.84 71.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reasons for use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Method of contraception Protection against STIs Protection against HIV/AIDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04 23 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.70 44.23 48.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partner type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occasional Fixed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.69 17.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reasons for not using the female condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Expensive and less available in pharmacies No prefer Unpleasant for me Unpleasant for my partner Difficult insertion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 09 06 06 06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.43 12.96 08.57 08.57 08.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge of the point of sale of these condoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.02 90.98</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the female condom, the Characteristics prompting the need for female condom use by sex workers and the level of use, the fact of not having suffered from an STI, the not having a partner with an STI and the lack of knowledge of a case of death following AIDS is associated with the low use of female condoms.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics prompting the need for female condoms to be used by sex workers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Categories</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Workforce n = 122</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have already been tested for HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105 17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.07 13.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Having suffered from an STI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.98 59.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have had a partner with IST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.21 82.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recognition of the existence of HIV and its sexual transmission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.98 09.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have experienced a case of death from AIDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.26 55.74</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Association between the socio-demographic characteristics of sex workers and the use of female condoms</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Use of the female condom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X<sup>2 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P (value)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meaning</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No n = 70 (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes n = 52 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29 years old 30 and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (20.00) 56 (80.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (73.08) 14 (26.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without other work With additional work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (17.14) 58 (82.86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (55.79) 23 (44.21)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9508</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without level And Primary Secondary and Higher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (55.71) 31 (44.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (76.92) 12 (23.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8803</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 50,000 FC 50,000 FC and more</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (14.29) 60 (85.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (72.55) 14 (27.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.1613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxic habits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Take the substances Do not take</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seniority in work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 11 years 12 and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (70.00) 21 (30.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (94.23) 03 (05.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge of the point of sale of these condoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 (94.29) 04 (05.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (86.54) 07 (13.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In our research, the results on the socio-demographic characteristics of sex workers point out that the age group of 20 - 29 years (36.89%) and 30 - 39 years</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Association between knowledge about STIs, the female condom and its use by sex workers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Use of the female condom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X<sup>2 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P (value)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meaning</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No N = 70 (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes N = 52 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge of the point of sale of these condoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 (94.29) 04 (05.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (86.54) 07 (13.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13954</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have already been tested for HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08 (11.43) 62 (88.57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09 (13.93) 43 (86.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8599</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3537</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Having suffered from an STI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (45.71) 38 (54.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (76.92) 12 (23.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Having a partner with IST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (75.71) 17 (24.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (92.31) 04 (07.69)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recognition of the existence of HIV and its sexual transmission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07 (10.00) 63 (90.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04 (07.69) 48 (92.31)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6598</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Having experienced a death from AIDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (40.00) 42 (60.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (76.92) 12 (23.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(37.70%) are the most represented among the workers of sex, with an average age of 32.8279 &#177; 8.9227; the commune of Dibindi leads with 49.18%; 66.49% have no other job; the majority live in a state of celibacy (31.97%) and separated (36.01%); 42.62% are at the primary level; 60.66% have a monthly income below 50,000 FC; 95.90% are used to taking toxic substances such as Hemp, Alcohol, Psychotropic drugs; 69.67% have a seniority of 2 to 11 years in sex work; 19.67% do not belong to a religious confection.</p><p>In view of these results, this age group represents the period when certain women, after having missed marriage at the age of less than 30, prefer in this state of despair, food in a condition where they must receive men to the gap to provide for certain needs of life. The commune of Dibindi by its proximity to the big market of the city is a preferable environment for these women in order to facilitate their sale of alcohol and other intoxicating substances and trafficking with different customers.</p><p>Contrary to our results, in a study in Cameroon by Sobze Martin Sanou et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref5">5</xref>] , the average age was 22.6 years [σ: 5.4], with 77.23% between 15 - 24 years; 76.6% had a university education, compared to 21.7% and 1.7% at the secondary and primary levels, respectively. Singles were in the majority (95.3%), followed by married couples (3%). 76% use condoms, compared to 24% who do not. Regarding the knowledge of sex workers on the female condom and its use, we found that all sex workers have already heard of female condoms; 63.93% received the information during the HIV awareness campaign; only 42.62% have already used these condoms; of this proportion, 71.16% use only occasionally; respectively, they put forward as reasons for use: Means of contraception (07.70%), Means of protection against STIs (44.23%), Means of protection against HIV/AIDS (48.07); 82.69% use only with an occasional partner.</p><p>In Togo, according to Tambashe BO, et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref6">6</xref>] most sex workers (TS) (96%) use condoms less, because only 23% of TS and only 4% of truck drivers declared having used the female condom at some point in their sex life. Although the use of the female condom is low, the intention to use it in the future reaches significant proportions both among TS (82%) and among truckers (65%) according to the USAID sheet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Our research also revealed that among the proportion who do not use condoms, 61.41% say that it is expensive and less available in pharmacies and 90.98% do not know the point of sale of these condoms; the characteristics prompting the need for the female condom by sex workers make us notice that 86.07% have already been tested for HIV; 40.98% admit having suffered from an STI; 17.21% have already had a partner with IST; 90.98% Acknowledge the existence of HIV and its sexual transmission; 44.26% say they have experienced a death from AIDS.</p><p>Compared to the study carried out in Central America by Tambashe BO, Talnan E., Sala-Diakanda F., Djangone R., Ametepe F. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref8">8</xref>] on the introduction of female condoms to prostitutes, the investigators met on several occasions prostitutes, after providing them with information on the female condom and how to use it, and after distributing samples to them, they explain that the advantages reported by the women were important lubrication, the size of the condom that accommodates to all penis sizes, the comfort felt by the partners after several uses, and the better resistance than the male condom. They also said they felt better protected against STIs and pregnancy than with a male condom. The reported disadvantages were size (but this time in its unsightly appearance), initial physical discomfort (which disappeared with experience), and the ability to scare their customers with the device. Women recommended training to insert the condom several times alone, before using it with a partner according to Mack et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Results of Bivariate Analysis</title><p>The association between the socio-demographic characteristics of sex workers and the use of female condoms had revealed in the analyses that the age between 20 and 29 years, the lack of another job, the income less than 50,000 FC, Seniority in work of less than 12 years are associated with low use of female condoms; because their p (value) is less than 0.05.</p><p>While the association between knowledge about the female condom, the characteristics prompting the need for female condom use by sex workers and the level of use, the fact of not having suffered an STI, the fact of not having had a partner with an STI and the lack of knowledge of a case of death from AIDS is associated with the low use of female condoms. For his part, Ngamini Ngui, A [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103126-ref10">10</xref>] studied the Determinants of condom use among young people in C&#244;te d’Ivoire, on the sample of 4,136 people (81.21% men and 18.79% women) aged between 15 and 24 years old. The results show that the prevalence of condom use is very low in this sample (20%). Women (24.1%), the very wealthy (31.2%), academics (57%), senior managers (60%) and city dwellers (24.4%) are the heaviest condom users.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tshilonda, J.C.B., Tshibanda, A.K., Katambue, J.K., Kabemba, G.K., Kabemba, R.K., Ngoyi, C.K., Kifwame, P.K., Kikudi, M., Kitengie, C.N., Mulenda, F.K., Ngoyi, N.E., Kapafule, S.K., Nsomue, C.K., Kasongo, A.E. and Koloy, E.T. (2020) Rate of Use of Female Condoms in Sex Professionals in the City of Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of Congo. Open Access Library Journal, 7: 6710. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106710</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.103126-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNDP/UNFPA/WHO Program. (1997) The Female Condom. WHO, Geneva, 40 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prescribe Writing. (2005) Female Condom. An Alternative to the Male Condom. Prescribe Review, 25, 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO and UNFPA. (2012) Female Condom: Generic Prequalification Specifications and Purchasing Guidelines.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akilimali, P.Z., Ntumba, M.N., Mavila, A.K. and Kaba, D.K. (2014) Determinants of Condom Non-Use among Sex Workers in the Rural Health Area of Demba.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287999444</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanou, S.M., Joseph, F., Russo, G., Cristiano, V., Luca, F., Achille, P., et al. (2012) Use of the Female Condom in Cameroon: Issues and Challenges for HIV Prevention Programs in Africa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USAID. (2015). Condom Fact Sheet.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macaluso, M., Blackwell, R., Jamieson, D.J., et al. (2007) Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166, 88-96. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tambashe, B.O., Talnan, E., Sala-Diakanda, F., Djangone, R. and Ametepe, F. (2002) Acceptability of the Female Condom by Sex Workers and Truckers in Togo. SFPS Regional Project, Abidjan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mack, N., Gray, T.G., Amsterdam, A., Williamson, N. and Matta, C.I. (2010) Introducing Female Condoms to Female Sex Workers in Central America. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 149-155.  
https://doi.org/10.1363/3614910</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103126-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngamini Ngui, A. (2010). Determinants of Condom Use among Young People in C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. In Black African Medicine.  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235004662</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>