<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBCPR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2328-4889</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbcpr.2020.83013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBCPR-103089</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation on Spatial Adaptability of Historic Urban Blocks for Commercial Regeneration
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guopeng</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yanbing</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lingxi</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Architecture and Art, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>216</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In view of the current situation of aging, functional decline and protection difficulties in historic blocks, the feasibility of commercial regeneration is discussed. Referring to the relevant theories of protection and renewal of historic blocks, field investigation and expert consultation, fuzzy evaluation method and analytic hierarchy process are introduced to carry out a research study on the spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration and establish a preliminary evaluation system. An example of Dongguan Street Historic Block in Dalian is used to test the evaluation system. This provides a basis for the formulation of commercial regeneration strategy in the next stage.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Historic Block</kwd><kwd> Commercial Regeneration</kwd><kwd> Adaptability</kwd><kwd> Evaluation System</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>China has been undergoing unprecedentedly rapid changes, which is reflected by the large-scale construction in many cities. On the one hand, historic blocks as the carrier of urban culture are facing severe challenges. The interiors of historic blocks are badly damaged and are in dire need of renewal due to their long time past and lack of necessary protection and maintenance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref2">2</xref>]. On the other hand, to satisfy the needs of modern life, commercial activities are booming with greater and greater purchasing power. Against this background, the archaistic business zones in vulgar style that provide poor experience came into being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref3">3</xref>]. Therefore, we should embark on commercial regeneration of the existing run-down urban historic blocks, preserve the original space while injecting vitality with new functions so as to form a benign industrial cycle. This should be considered as an effective strategy for the revival of the existing historic blocks, and it is conducive to the establishment of high-quality business blocks.</p><p>There are three types of related researches: 1) the study of the spatial morphology of historic blocks: to systematically analyze the characteristics of historic blocks to provide basic information for the reconstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref6">6</xref>]; 2) the study of and empirical discussion about the corresponding design methods for different regeneration methods: to figure out the method from the theory and put forward effective reconstruction strategies according to the law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref9">9</xref>]; 3) performance evaluation of the built environment of the commercial regeneration of historic blocks: to sort and summarize the actual condition after the completion of the project, analyze the shortcomings and symptoms and figure out the corresponding optimization strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref13">13</xref>]. In this paper, we try to build an initial evaluation system from the perspective of the research on the spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration that are less mentioned, hoping to explore the various factors that affect the commercial regeneration of historic blocks and promote scientific reconstruction.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Evaluation Index of Spatial Adaptability of Historic Blocks for Commercial Regeneration</title><p>The word “adapt” derives from the Latin ad (to) and aptare (fit) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref14">14</xref>] and refers to adjustment and change. In the case of historical block, adaptability means the ability to adapt to a new application without compromising the original characteristics of a block. The spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration depends on the coordination among and dynamic development of various elements of the blocks, and restricts the specific modes of the reconstruction and renewal of historic blocks. The idea of introducing adaptability into construction building and planning research is to assist the decision-making process considering the sustainability and suitability for urban regeneration.</p><p>In Revitalizing Historic Urban Blocks, Tiesdell, Heath, and Oc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref15">15</xref>] illustrated how to create a place in harmony with the context from different dimensions of the block with Glasgow business block, Denver LODO block and Shad Thames block as the examples; in Shanghai XINTIANDI Square—A Model of Old City Reconstruction, was analyzed and evaluated the regeneration in terms of overall planning, passages, edges, areas, nodes and markers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref16">16</xref>]; in Performance of Commercial Renovation and Optimization of Historic Districts, Chen Meng [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref11">11</xref>] qualitatively evaluated the commercialization performance of Ningbo historic blocks from the perspectives of space, culture, economy, facilities, society et al. and explained the reasons for its low performance.</p><p>The above researches show that there are complex and diverse factors influencing the adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration. They may include spatial elements such as block environment and street buildings, social factors such as block development and government guidance. Different factors have different effects. In this paper, we mainly study the spatial elements. In order to have an overall cognition of material aspects of the block and guarantee reasonable and feasible evaluation indexes when establishing the evaluation system, we select and supplement the elements in line with the following principles:</p><p>&#183; Principle of science: the indexes should be scientific, normative and representative, independent from each other with weak correlation;</p><p>&#183; Principle of operability: the effectiveness and operability of indexes should be guaranteed in practical application, so that they are easy to collect, sort out, differentiate and quantify;</p><p>&#183; Principle of hierarchy: the indexes should be classified into different levels from top to bottom according to their relations of juxtaposition or inclusion, so as to avoid logic ambiguity and disorder in subordination relations among the indexes;</p><p>&#183; Principle of comprehensiveness: the indexes should cover a complete evaluation system and avoid one-sidedness.</p><p>According to the research system of Analytic Hierarchy Process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref19">19</xref>], in the first level of evaluation indexes, we should list and layer-by-layer subdivide the five types of indexes including external environment, overall situation, internal street and lane space, landscape nodes and markers and internal buildings of historic blocks from macroscopic level to microcosmic level.</p><p>&#183; External environment of historic blocks: the historic blocks as part of urban space have undergone long-term development and change. They have a lot to do with the surroundings. The external environment consisting of spatial location, traffic conditions, surrounding conditions. determines the block’s commerce carrying capacity and potential commercial value at the city level, and affects the commercial regeneration of the block;</p><p>&#183; Overall situation of historic blocks: as an internal factor, the situation itself plays a decisive role in the spatial adaptability. The group scale of a historic block is related to the input and output of regeneration, the regeneration method and the corresponding commercial type after the regeneration; the openness of a historic block determines its communication with the outside world and whether it is easy to be perceived by the crowd; the overall spatial layout reflects the spatial organization and order relationship of the building and affects its fit with the commercial functional organization; the internal flow affects the security, orderliness and commercial enjoyment;</p><p>&#183; Internal street and lane space: the streets and lanes enclosed by the three-dimensional interface are the basic skeleton of the historical block, the main carrier of people’s behavior and activities after commercial regeneration, and an important index of spatial adaptability. In The Aesthetic Townscape, Yoshinobu Ashihara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.103089-ref20">20</xref>] analyzes the internal street and lane space from the perspectives of the shape (sinuosity), interface, dimensions and scale of street and lane;</p><p>&#183; Landscape nodes and markers: as a point space different from linear streets and lanes, abundant and orderly nodes are important resources for commercial regeneration and are beneficial to the formation of an active and prosperous block atmosphere. The signs along the streets help pedestrians to develop a clear impression of the block and are conducive to determining the focus of commercial regeneration;</p><p>&#183; Internal buildings: internal buildings, streets and lanes, and nodes and markers, are the concrete material presentation of a historic block. The building quality, design and decoration of historic blocks all affect the value and vitality of the block; and it is not easy to meet the requirements through brief reconstruction.</p><p>According to the theoretical literature in historic blocks morphological characteristics, reconstruction and renewal, value assessment, commercial street design, adaptation of urban blocks and other related fields as well as practice research studies on the historic blocks, in combination with the classification principle of Analytic Hierarchy Process, we reorganize a logical relationship of evaluation objectives, comprehensive evaluation, factor evaluation and element evaluation towards the identified evaluation index group, and formulate the Evaluation System of Spatial Adaptability of Historic blocks for Commercial Regeneration. Through integration, it is divided into five comprehensive evaluation layer indexes, 16-factor evaluation layer indexes and 20-element evaluation layer indexes as illustrated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Hierarchy system of evaluation index group of spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Comprehensive evaluation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor evaluation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element evaluation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >External environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Spatial location</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Geographical location</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible development</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Traffic conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accessibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parking conditions</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Surrounding facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surrounding greening situation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipal facilities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public service facilities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Overall situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Size</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Road accessibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interface openness</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Spatial layout</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Internal flow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Streets and lanes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Shape</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bottom interface</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side interface</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top interface</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dimensions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Scale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width /Height</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of buildings/Width</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Landscape nodes and markers</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nodes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Markers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Buildings</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Building quality</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building Design</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Form layout</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Structural materials</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building decoration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building style</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building details</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Evaluation System of Spatial Adaptability of Historic Blocks for Commercial Regeneration</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Perspectives and Methods of Evaluation</title><p>This paper emphasizes on the spatial elements of historic blocks for the evaluation of spatial adaptability. Currently, the research of street-block space and the design of commercial space are all based on mature theories. Therefore, we use the following methods in a specific evaluation process though theoretical judgment combined with an evaluation of a small number of subjects:</p><p>&#183; For data acquisition, we mainly adopt the method of literature research combined with field research, so as to get the theoretical basis of evaluation standards and accurate data of empirical cases. In a specific survey, the methods including observation, mapping, scaling, summary and induction are adopted;</p><p>&#183; Data analysis and evaluation: The methods used in data analysis and evaluation include the follows:</p><p>1) Qualitative and quantitative analysis: carry out the qualitative judgment on the evaluation objects and quantitative translation based on the results;</p><p>2) Analytic Hierarchy Process: decompose the index group into objective layer, comprehensive layer, factor layer and element layer for evaluation and weight calculation;</p><p>3) Delphi method: for the weight calculation, get the experts' judgment on the importance of evaluation indexes by issuing consulting questionnaires and then calculated the weight of indexes;</p><p>4) Fuzzy evaluation method: for the result analysis, rank and evaluate the various indexes of the evaluation object according to the obtained scores based on the fuzzy mathematical principle;</p><p>5) Comprehensive evaluation method: “integrate” the evaluation index values of different aspects into an overall comprehensive evaluation value to obtain direct evaluation results.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Determination of Index Weight</title><p>Different influence indexes have different influences on the adaptability historic blocks for commercial regeneration. Therefore, determining the weight of influence indexes is the key step to build a scientific and complete model for an evaluation and finish the overall assessment. In this paper, we determine the weight of influence indexes through case analysis studies and expert consultations and interviews, with the following main steps:</p><p>&#183; Select the domestic typical reconstruction cases of appropriate scale and great influence such as Shanghai Tian Zi Fang, XINTIANDI and Nanjing 1912, study the commercial regeneration methods, reconstruction process and the space, culture and economy of these historic blocks after commercial regeneration, analyze the role of all elements during the reconstruction and preliminarily determine the importance of each index in commercial regeneration.</p><p>&#183; Formulate the expert consulting questionnaires according to the influence indexes, and distribute them to the architectural and urban planning related professors in colleges and universities, architects in design institutes and subject relevant staff in business and historic preservation departments in local government. Valid questionnaires (94 out of 100) were collected. And then the expert consultation weights of different evaluation indexes according to the results of the consulting questionnaires were calculated with the Analytic Hierarchy Process software YAAHP, and verify the rationality through consistency testing.</p><p>&#183; Compare the results of preliminary weight of empirical analysis and weight of expert consultation, and get the final weight through fine adjustment and integration. The model for spatial adaptability evaluation is composed of influence evaluation indexes from Hierarchy System of Evaluation Index Group and their weights (100 in total), shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Evaluation Grade and Scoring Criteria</title><p>In order to quantify the evaluation indexes, we divide the evaluation indexes into four scores levels (0 - 2 points, 3 - 5 points, 6 - 8 points, 8 - 10 points), by referring to the scoring standards of the existing relevant evaluation system and combining with the design theory and the overall characteristics of historic urban blocks, to realize a certain degree of differentiation and ensure the implementation of the evaluation. It’s very difficult for China with a vast territory to establish a unified evaluation standard due to its numerous and distinctive historical districts affected by different factors. In this study, we try to establish the reference basis based on its generality (shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). During the in-depth study of one specific historic block, we should determine the scoring standard through modification and adjustment according to the characteristics of the historic block.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Application of Evaluation Results</title><p>According to the evaluation and quantification results, which theoretically could go from 0 to 1000 aggregate scores, we divide the adaptability levels into Grade A, B, C and D. From A to D, the overall adaptability decreases, and the corresponding methods and strategies of commercial regeneration should be different.</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Evaluation system of spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Evaluation Index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Score</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factor evaluation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Element evaluation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >External environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Spatial location</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Geographical location</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Remote village or outer suburbs of a city</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outskirts of a city or edge of a district</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Center of a district</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Center of a city</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible development</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Two points for each fact: proximity to business circle, historical and cultural area, important transportation node, important public facilities and large living community</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Traffic conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inconvenient access and poor accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A variety of traffic and great accessibility</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parking conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extremely difficulty in parking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No parking facilities, Roadside parking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inadequate parking facilities, random parking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate facilities, convenient parking</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Surrounding facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surrounding greening situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Little green landscape and poor environmental quality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Little green landscape and ordinary environmental quality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much green landscape and good environmental quality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much green landscape and excellent environmental quality</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipal facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Two points for each of water supply, electricity, heating, gas and other additional facilities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public service facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Few types and insufficient quantity of facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Few types and ordinary quantity of facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Many types and ordinary quantity of facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Many types and abundant quantity of facilities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Overall situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Super-large historical block with an area more than 60 ha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small and medium-sized historical block with an area less than 10 ha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary historical block with an area between 10 ha and 60 ha</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Road accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not adjacent to urban road</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Only adjacent to urban branch road</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adjacent to urban secondary main road</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adjacent to urban main road</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interface openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dominated by wall interface; The block is closed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dominated by building interface; Moderate openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More greening interfaces; Good openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More square node interfaces; excellent openness</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spatial layout</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Promiscuous space and disordered arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >The pattern layout forms include linear arrangement type, the independent centripetal type, the homogeneous structure type, the traditional courtyard type and the group centripetal type and so on, each with its own merits and demerits. Therefore, it is necessary to judge based on the specific conditions.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixing of pedestrians and vehicles, and crossing between inside and outside</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Separation of pedestrians from vehicles, and crossing between inside and outside</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixing of pedestrians and vehicles, and separation of inside from outside</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Separation of pedestrians from vehicles, and separation of inside from outside</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Streets and lanes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shape</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Long straight path</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Short straight path</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Broken line path</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curved path</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bottom interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No pavement, discomfort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monotonous pavement, discomfort in gradient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monotonous pavement, safety and comfort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exquisite pavement, safety and comfort</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Side interface</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Messy style and poor continuity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Messy style and good continuity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unified style and good continuity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Uniformity in variety, clearness and continuity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disorganized outline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monotonous outline and poor sense of layering</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rich outline and disharmony with the environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rich outline and harmony with the environment</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dimensions</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shorter than 180 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shorter than 780 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180 m - 380 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380 m - 780 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shorter than 7 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longer than 15 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 m - 15 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 m - 10 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Scale</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width/ Height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 1:2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:1 - 1:2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of buildings/ Width</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slightly more than 1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than or equal to 1:1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Landscape nodes and markers</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Highly recognizable street and lane intersections, theme squares, traffic stations and open green spaces all belong to nodes and shall be awarded points according to the location, type and quantity.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Markers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Markers are visual center points in space and shall be awarded points according to its configuration quantity, image clarity and design quality.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Buildings</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building quality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor building quality and incomplete structural appearance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary building quality and partial damage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good building quality and availability after reinforcement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well preserved building, good quality</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building Design</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Form layout</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aggregative courtyard houses, etc.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distinct characteristic detached houses or featured low-rise buildings</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Structural materials</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wood structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brick and wood structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brick and concrete structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >New hybrid structure and frame</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building decoration</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building style</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >It is reflected by the proportion, color and decorating technique of each part. The feasibility of commercial use can be improved by increasing its artistic value. It is necessary to judge based on the specific conditions.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building details</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No design defects in details</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Details damage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perfect details and low value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well preserved, with exquisite details</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>If the evaluation result falls in Grade A (Aggregate score: 801 - 1000), it means that one historic block is highly compatible with commercial requirements. Therefore, it is suggested extending the vitality of the historic block through commercial regeneration. For specific implementation, the low-intensity development mode can be also adopted, to preserve the spatial structure and texture of the whole area as much as possible, respect the original appearance of the historical buildings, and conduct local small-scale renovation and progressive renewal to meet the requirements of modern business.</p><p>If the evaluation result falls in Grade B (Aggregate score: 501 - 800), it means that the adaptation of commercial regeneration of the block is strong. Therefore, it is suggested using commercial measures to properly transform the area to meet commercial functional requirements and achieve reservation of exterior and commerce replacement, on the basis of maintaining the overall style and building appearance of the block.</p><p>If the evaluation result falls in Grade C (Aggregate score: 201 - 500), it means that there are many problems in the historic block itself and even some major defects, and it is not suitable for commercial regeneration, from the perspective of commercial requirements. For specific implementation, high-intensity development may be required, which can be achieved through a large-scale restoration or even antique reconstruction while maintaining the same style and features.</p><p>If the evaluation result falls in Grade D (Aggregate score: 0 - 200), it means that one historic block is basically not suitable for commercial regeneration. Specifically, it may be due to the quality problem itself (for example, much damage has been done to the urban texture or buildings) or the huge difference between the features of the historic block and the commercial functional requirements and great difficulty in remedy through reconstruction.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Empirical Evaluation of Dalian Dongguan Street Historic Block</title><p>In this paper, we try to apply the Spatial Adaptability Evaluation model to Dalian Dongguan Street Historic Block. Dongguan Street Historic Block is located in the center of Dalian City, Xigang District. In 1889, it was planned, with the drawing and concept formed, as a market street of Chinese by Tsarist Russia. In 1905, high-density multi-floor courtyard houses were built here for Chinese laborers to live in. In 1930, it became a gathering place for Chinese merchants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the commercial atmosphere of Dongguan Street at that time). In 1945, it was classified into Xigang District as a residential area till now. It is now on the reconstruction schedule due to the decline in the overall quality. In 2017, proposals for the protection of historical buildings in Dalian Dongguan Street were solicited from the whole country.</p><p>Through the qualitative judgment, quantitative translation and statistics accounting of the adaptability of commercial regeneration of various parts of Dalian Dongguan Street Historic Block according to the evaluation system and scoring criteria, this research group graded each of the evaluation index and got the results as follows (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>):</p><p>The score of external environment is 168 (200 in total<sup>1</sup>). The advantageous urban location (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and traffic conditions make up for the deficiency in surrounding facilities. Afterwards, the surrounding facilities can be improved to some degree, such as increasing necessary municipal utilities and facilities (gas, water supply and drainage, lighting, public toilets, garbage stations and barrier-free facilities) and creating positive space through landscape planting.</p><p>The score of overall situation is 190 (280 in total). The Dalian Dongguan Street Historic Block features an appropriate size, high degree of openness and distinct spatial layout is easy to become a reticulate commercial street. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Evaluation of Sptial adaptability of Dalian Dongguan street historic block</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Evaluation Index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Score</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Score of each evaluation index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Aggregate score</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factor evaluation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Element evaluation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >External environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Spatial location</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Geographical location</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >168</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="27"  >700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible development</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Traffic conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parking conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Surrounding facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surrounding greening situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipal facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public service facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Overall situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >190</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Road accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interface openness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spatial layout</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Streets and lanes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shape</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >180</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bottom interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top interface</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dimensions</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Scale</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width/Height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of buildings/ Width</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Landscape nodes and markers</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Markers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Buildings</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building quality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building Design</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Form layout</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Structural materials</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Building decoration</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building style</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building details</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>shows the overall condition of Dalian Dongguan Street Historic Block. But at present, the internal flow is disordered, which makes it less conducive to reconstruction. Under this background, it is feasible to redesign the main and secondary axes, core nodes and different functional areas of Dongguan Street to knit up and integrate the existing messy texture on this basis; it is also recommended to reorganize traffic for vehicles and pedestrian flow and set up a number of parking facilities on one side of the road. The block interface on the main direction of people flow can be opened towards the city, attracting the flow of people with a entrance square, green plant landscape and landmark structures.</p><p>The score of internal streets and lanes is 180 (240 in total). The shape, proportion and scale of streets and lanes in the block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) are suitable for people to walk and communicate, which is interesting and pleasant. The block features poor bottom interface and less open side interface.</p><p>The score of landscape nodes and markers is 33 (90 in total). The building density of the block is high, and the orderly and homogeneous street space enclosed by the multi-storey building group bears all the public activities of the people. There is neither node space planned and designed within the block, nor iconic buildings or structures of distinctive images, except one six-storey building.</p><p>The score of buildings is 129 (190 in total). The building quality in the block is ordinary, and the main structure of some buildings is destroyed, restricting its application in practical commercial regeneration. With the style and details of high artistic value and obvious characteristics of the times (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), the buildings are recognizable in the city with overwhelming modern architecture. In the</p><p>regeneration, specific design can be conducted with reference to the existing reconstruction examples in combination with the evaluation results.</p><p>The spatial adaptability of Dongguan Street Historic Block for commercial regeneration scores 700 out of 1000 in total, falling in Grade B of the evaluation system. Thus, it has strong adaptability for commercial regeneration. Self-renewal of the block can be considered through commercial function implantation while maintaining the overall style and features of the whole area. In Dongguan Street Historic Block, as an area where Chinese people lived under colonial domination in modern times, many old and famous shops with strong brand effects still exist now, in addition to the typical modern residential buildings. According to the superior location and the characteristic of Dalian City as a tourism city, Dongguan Street Historic Block can be transformed into a characteristic tourism and commercial pedestrian street dominated by old business and supplemented by leisure entertainment and catering in terms of function.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Historic blocks unavoidably face challenges from the present and the future. One way out for most historic blocks is to carry out necessary protection, restoration and renovation to embrace new functions. In this paper, we have introduced the method to establish an evaluation system of spatial adaptability of historic blocks for commercial regeneration, both qualitatively and quantitatively on the basis of abundant literature study, consulting interviews and field investigations. Taking Dalian Dongguan Street as an example, we have discussed the application of the evaluation system from the specific operation level and checked its rationality and operability, with the hope to provide solutions for the issues encountered in the renovation and reconstruction of historic blocks.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the teachers and students in Design Workshop 2015 held by Dalian University of Technology and Tokyo Denki University for providing initial investigation material of Dongguan Street and the professors and architects for assistance with questionnaires to determine the weight of each evaluation index. This research was supported by Open Projects Fund of Key Laboratory of Ecology and Energy-saving Study of Dense Habitat (Tongji University), Ministry of Education, Project Number: 201830202; and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant Number: DUT19RW113.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Li, G.P., Li, Y.B. and Wang, L.X. (2020) Evaluation on Spatial Adaptability of Historic Urban Blocks for Commercial Regeneration. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 8, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2020.83013</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.103089-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sui, Q., Zhang, F., Matsumura, S. and Nizawa, T. (1995) The Architectural Heritage of Modern China: Dalian. China Architecture &amp; Building Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Colonial Residential Building of Dalian</article-title><source> Journal of Shenyang Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 195</fpage>-<lpage>200</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, G., Zhu, Q., Li, Y. and Liu, J. (2016) Adaptable Strategies on the Regeneration of Historical Urban Centre. International Conference on Social Design and Resilient Sustainable Planning, Taipei, 11 March 2016, C-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duan, J. and Ji, S. (2015) Spatial Research Review of Ancient Towns in Taihu Basin. Rural Planning and Construction, No. 3, 37-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, M. and Dong, W. (2004) Research on the Application of GIS Technology in Historic Block Protection Planning. Architectural Journal, 12, 63-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, Q., Xu, X., Xu, M. and Cui, N. (2012) Analysis on the Spatial Form and Style Features of the Five Avenues Historical Area in Tianjin. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), No. 2, 150-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oc, T., Health, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2010) Design in Historic Urban Blocks. https://www.ledonline.it/Rivista-Scienze-Turismo/Allegati/RST-I-2-04-Oc-Heath-Tiesdell.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, Y. and Huang, Y. (2016) Spatial Rebuilding in Renewal and Reconstruction of Historic Block—Taking Shanghai XINTIANDI and Tian Zi Fang as Examples. Papers Collection of the 2016 Annual Conference on Urban Planning of Chinese Cities, Shenyang, 24 September 2016, 308-317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, J. (2016) Commercial Reform of Historical and Cultural Districts—A Case Study of Nanjing 1912 Theme District. Architecture &amp; Culture, No. 8, 154-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y. and Li, X. (2015) Research on Public Evaluation of Commercial Reform of Historical and Cultural Blocks—A Case Study of “Nanjing 1912”. Huazhong Architecture, No. 8, 27-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, M., Wu, Y. and Wu, C. (2013) Performance of Commercial Renovation and Optimization of Historical Districts. Planners, 10, 86-90+96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruan, Y. and Gu, X. (2004) An Analysis about the Practical Patterns to Conserve the Historic Districts in China. Journal of Tongji University Social Science Section, No. 5, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, Q. and Hu, S. (2007) Evaluation on the Quality of Protected Built Environment of Historic Districts. Architectural Journal, No. 6, 66-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douglas, J. (2002) Building Adaptation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiesdell, S., Taner, O. and Heath, T. (1996) Revitalizing Historic Urban Blocks. Architectural Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, X. (2001) XINTIANDI, One of the Mode of Urban Revitalization. Time + Architecture, No. 4, 24-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ho, W. and Ma, X. (2018) The State-of-the-Art Integrations and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267, 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2012) Models, Methods, Concepts &amp; Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forman, E.H. and Gass, S.I. (2001) The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashihara, Y. (1983) The Aesthetic Townscape. MIT Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.103089-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dalian City Memory: Dongguan Street Old Buildings. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4cd69daf0102efuw.html</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>