The plant materials used in this study consisted of F. sycomorus, L. inermis and G. glabra which were collected from different areas in Gaza strip (Table 1).

Three types of media were used for carrying out this study, Nutrient broth, Nutrient agar and Muller Hinton agar. Distilled water and ethanol was used for extraction process. Cefotaxime, Ofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and Amikacin used as reference antibiotics (Table 2). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethanol 80%.

Clinical isolated species of S. aureus, and E. coli were obtained from Biology & Biotechnology Department at the Islamic University of Gaza (IUG), and were maintained on DMSO at −80˚C for further experiments.

Commercial microwave oven (Panasonic) with ten power levels (80 to 800 W) was used NN-SE996S.

A total of plants extract were used in this study as shown in Table 3.

According to (Mohammed et al., 2015) stock cultures were maintained at 4˚C on nutrient agar slants for bacteria. Active cultures for experiments were prepared by transferring 0.5 ml of culture to 5 ml of nutrient broth and incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours. The optical density of each active culture adjusted to 0.1 at 625 nm, using fresh broth to give standard inocula of 106 colony forming units (CFU) per ml [3] [14] [15].

A modification procedure was followed to evaluate of antibacterial activity of plant extracts. Standardized inoculums of each bacterium, i.e., 10⁶ CFU (Colony Forming Units)/ml to 0.1 at 625 nm was introduced onto the surface of sterile Nutrient agar plates and a sterile cotton swab was used for even distribution of inoculums. After a few minutes, sterile filter paper discs of 5 mm diameter were placed on the surface of inoculated and labeled nutrient agar plates and impregnated with 20 μL of known concentration of extracts (200 mg/ml) for aquatic and ethanolic extracts. Sterile paper discs containing Dimethyl sulfoxide alone was served as negative control. The plates were placed at 4˚C for 2 h. and then subsequently incubated at 37˚C for 24 Hrs. After incubation, the growth inhibition rings were quantified by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition in mm. For each test solution, three replicates were maintained [16].

A modification procedure was followed to investigate the synergistic effect. The bacterial cultures were grown in sterile nutrient broth medium at 37˚C. After 4 h of growth, standardized inoculums of each bacterium, i.e., 10⁶ CFU/ml to 0.1 at

625 nm was introduced onto the surface of sterile Nutrient agar plates and a sterile cotton swab was used for even distribution of inoculums. After a few minutes, the antibiotic filter paper disk of 5 mm in diameter placed on the surface of inoculated and labeled Nutrient agar plates and impregnated with 20 μL of known concentration of extracts (200 mg/ml) for aquatic and ethanolic extracts. The plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. The diameters of cleared zones were measured and compared with that of the antibiotic alone. For each test solution, three replicates were maintained [7].

The results in Tables 4-9 showed that ethanolic extracts used against selected microorganisms offered antimicrobial and synergistic effect with most antibiotics better than aquatic extracts. In case of aquatic extracts; G. glabra had the best antibitic activity against E. coli. In case of ethanolic extracts, the best activity was observed with G. glabra against E. coli. Also, synergistic activity of the plant extracts, in case of aquatic extracts; F. sycomorus had the best synergism against S. aureus and E. coli. In case of ethanolic extracts, the best synergism was observed with L. innermis against E. coli, and with F. sycomorus against S. aureus. High levels of antagonism reaction exhibited by all aquatic plant extracts of both methods when combined with antibiotics which showed sensitivity when tested as alone against S. aureus. Also all ethanolic extracts of L. innermis and G. glabra of both methods exhibited antagonism reactions when combined with antibiotics which showed sensitivity when tested as alone against S. aureu. In addition, antagonism reaction occurred against E. coli for antibiotics which were resistant against E. coli when combined with aquatic and ethanolic extracts for both methods of G. glabra which showed sensitivity when tested as alone against E. coli. In addition, dilution reactions against S. aureus occurred with some antibiotics combined with ethanolic extracts of F. sycomorus & L. innermis.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, R = Resistance.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, n = 3, R = Resistance.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, n = 3, R = Resistance, D.W.: Distilled water. P.E.: Plant Extract, S.S.: Sample Symbol, F: Nitrofurantoin; OFX: Ofloxacin; LEV: Levofloxacin; AK: Amikacin; CTX: Cefotaxim.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, n = 3, R = Resistance, D.W.: Distilled water. P.E.: Plant Extract, S.S.: Sample Symbol, F: Nitrofurantoin; OFX: Ofloxacin; LEV: Levofloxacin; AK: Amikacin; CTX: Cefotaxim.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, n = 3, R = Resistance, D.W.: Distilled water. P.E.: Plant Extract, S.S.: Sample Symbol, F: Nitrofurantoin; OFX: Ofloxacin; LEV: Levofloxacin; AK: Amikacin; CTX: Cefotaxim.

mm = millimeter, *Mean ± Standard Deviation, n = 3, R = Resistance, D.W.: Distilled water. P.E.: Plant Extract, S.S.: Sample Symbol, F: Nitrofurantoin; OFX: Ofloxacin; LEV: Levofloxacin; AK: Amikacin; CTX: Cefotaxim.

Through evaluation of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and in synergisms/Antagonism, our results which obtained from ethanolic extracts (ethanol as a solvent) had shown better results than that obtained from aquatic extracts (water as a solvent). In addition most of aquatic extracts results had shown no inhibition zone. The same solvent system of samples used in extraction process in both methods MW and soxhlet in this study had shown mostly the same inhibition zone results, and some tests of MW samples had shown better than soxhlet samples. So, because of high capacity with high dielectric constant, ethanol is the best solvent in our experiments of extraction process. This evaluation is in agreement with previous studies [6] [13] [17] [18] [19] [20].

Through evaluation of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and in synergisms/Antagonism, our results showed that, the inhibition zone is increased by increasing the time of extraction till reaching in a steady state values of inhibition zone. This may due to increasing of the time of extraction which lead to increasing of the yield of bioactive compounds till to reach a saturation although of increasing time. The samples of our plants in this study which extracted in one minute were in mostly had shown no inhibition zone except samples extracted by using a power 540 w which had shown a weak inhibition zone. But in general the samples extracted in tow and three minutes had shown a maximum value and the same results of inhibition zone. So we can considered that the best with optimum time of extraction is a sample-d which extracted in tow minutes and had shown a maximum inhibition zone with a lowest power 180 w. Our results showed that, the MW method gave better results or at least same outputs as soxhlet method. We recommended MW method since it provides bioactive compounds in a very short time, mostly few minutes and a very low power. Other conventional methods may attribute to a degradation of bioactive compounds in long time of extraction process of conventional methods. This evaluation is in agreement with previous studies [6] [13] [17] [18] [19] [20].

Through evaluation of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and synergisms/Antagonism effect, our results showed that, the inhibition zone is increased by increasing the MW power of extraction process till reaching in a steady state result of inhibition zone. This may due to increasing of the MW power of extraction which lead to increasing of the yield of bioactive compounds till reaching a saturation although of increasing MW power. The samples of our plants in this study which extracted in one minute were in mostly showed no inhibition zone, although of increasing of MW power except some samples extracted by using a power 540 w which showed a weak of inhibition zone. But in most, they didn’t show any effect by increasing MW power for samples extracted in two and three minutes which showed a maximum and the same results of inhibition zone. So we can consider that the best with optimum MW power of extraction is a sample-d which extracted at lowest power 180 w in tow minutes and showed a maximum inhibition zone. According to the temperature, the results of ethanolic samples were better than aquatic samples. Due to high dielectric properties of ethanol, it leads to increasing of temperature of the medium solvent-solute, and thus increasing of the extraction of the bioactive compound, then had shown more of antimicrobial activity of inhibition zone. This evaluation is in agreement with previous studies [6] [13] [17] [18] [19].