<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2020.108042</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-102551</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Geotechnical and Mineralogical Properties of the Recently Exposed Black Mud Deposits along the Northeastern Shore of the Dead Sea
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Waed</surname><given-names>Abu Alhaj</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elias</surname><given-names>Salameh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Science, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Geology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>943</fpage><lpage>956</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Along the recently evacuated shores of the retreating Dead Sea black mud deposits have been exposed and hence subjected to head ward erosion resulting in landslides and land collapses threatening herewith the infrastructure in the area. The geotechnical and mineralogical characterization of the black mud show the presence of a variety of clays including smectite, kaolinite, illite, montmorollinite and muscovite with a natural water content near the liquid limit. These geotechnical and mineralogical properties indicate that the mud is prone to rapid erosion and sliding, which actually hit the area and have until now caused damages and degrading topography and geology in the area. The study also refers the origin of the black mud and its organic content to the erosion and deposition of Upper Cretaceous-Tertiary oil shale deposits formerly covering the whole surrounding areas of the Dead Sea. The study suggests engineering solutions to the geologic degradation processes in the area, before further damage to the infrastructure takes place.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Retreating Dead Sea</kwd><kwd> Land Collapses</kwd><kwd> Organic Mud in Hyper-Saline Water</kwd><kwd> Geological Engineering</kwd><kwd> Mineralogical Characteristics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The retreat of the Dead Sea during the last five decades exposed new land and older coastal sediments formerly covered by Dead Sea (DS) water. Gravels, sands and rocks boulders build the sediments of the shores, further offshore, silt and clay sediments came to deposition.</p><p>The wadis which formerly used to flow directly into the DS discharged at a DS level of approximately −395 m in 1960s. Since then discharge levels have dropped simultaneously with the drop in the DS level, which caused cutting into the older coastal sediments. The topographic slopes between the older shore level and the present one gradually increased and became very high which allowed flood and base flows to incise deep wadis in the non-consolidated sediments of the older shore areas and to cause heavy degradation in the set-up of the area resulting in strong erosion, land collapses and landslides and sink hole formation, among others with all the ramifications to the infrastructure of the area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>This study focuses on the degradation processes and the geotechnical and mineralogical properties of the rocks leading to the geo-hazards in the area along the northeastern shore of the DS.</p><p>Engineering geological solutions are offered to rehabilitate the degrading geologic setup and to protect the infrastructure of roads, buildings, hotels, bridges, water culverts and farming lands.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Methodology</title><p>Field work was carried out to study the recent sediments, their extension and thickness, the recent deformation structures in them and to collect water and rock samples for laboratory analyses.</p><p>Laboratory testing was carried out at the laboratories of the University of Jordan and Halle University, Germany. The random XRD scanned the rock samples from 2˚ to 60˚, using Cu, kα, (X-Ray Diffractometer SHIMADZU 7000) with computerized peak plots. SHIMADZU-1800 was used to quantitatively analyze the metal contents of the samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a magnification of &gt;100,000X was used.</p><p>Compression tests were performed using DIN 18135 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref6">6</xref>] for soil, investigation and testing. Samples were extracted in cylindrical sample tubes in the field and WilleGeotechnik equipment in the laboratory.</p><p>Direct shear tests were performed in a constant displacement sheer rate of 0.002 mm/min using WilleGeotechnik, type: SL 100z using different normal stresses of 400, 200 and 100 kPa (1 Pa = 1 N/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>Liquid and plastic limit tests were performed according to DIN 18122-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref7">7</xref>] and permeability tests according to DIN 18130 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref8">8</xref>], Soil investigation and testing. MicrotracZetatrac machine was used for particle size analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Location of the Study Area</title><p>The study area is located along the northeastern shores of the DS between coordinates 31˚44'15.56&quot;N to 31˚47'50.05&quot;N and 35˚35'34.13&quot;E to 35˚36'15.13&quot;E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref9">9</xref>] ). The topography of the area extending from the DS highway to the DS shore line varies in elevation from 390 mbsl on the highway (The DS level during the 1960s was 395 mbsl) to 431 mbsl at the present DS shore. It is a</p><p>terrain dissected by many recent wadi courses, along which land collapses and landslides have developed.</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Geology</title><p>The area is built of Pleistocene marl and clay (black mud) deposits of about 20 m exposed thickness covered by a few meters of recent gravels and sands.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mineralogical Analyses</title><p>The mineralogy of whole samples collected from the study area were studied by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and particle size analysis.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)</title><p>X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) was carried out on two samples prepared by color separation; grey and black to analyze the mineral content of the black mud. The results are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, which shows that the gray content is composed of aragonite, calcite, dolomite, gypsum, halite, halite potassium, illite, kaolinite, muscovite and quartz and does not contain anorthoclase and montmorillonite, whereas the black content is composed of aragonite, calcite, dolomite, gypsum, kaolinite, muscovite, montmorillonite and quartz and does not contain dolomite, halite, halite potassium and illite. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) show that the main minerals in the samples are: Calcite, quartz, dolomite, muscovite, kaolinite, illite, smectite, halite and pyrite.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)</title><p>The results of XRF are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> which shows that the clays mainly contain oxides of silicon, calcium, aluminum, iron, potassium and sodium and less than 1% of each of titanium, sulfur, phosphate, strontium manganese, barium chromium, rubidium zinc, nickel and copper</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)</title><p>Mud samples were scanned for their contents on clay minerals and to obtain microscopic SEM images of these clays. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrates, as an example, the images of the studied mud samples showing kaolinite and the SEM analytical metal results.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Qualitative mineral content of a grey and black mud samples obtained by using XRF (+ means mineral was detected in the sample)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mineral</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dead Sea mud</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grey Content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Black Content</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aragonite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anorthoclase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dolomite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gypsum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Halite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Halite potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kaolinite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muscovite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Montmorillonite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quartz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> XRF result of representative mineral contents of Dead Sea mud samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Content</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Content</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.152</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Engineering Properties</title><p>Different geo-techniques, as detailed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref10">10</xref>] have been used to characterize the engineering properties of the Dead Sea mud. They are discussed in the following paragraphs. Engineering tests were carried out using DIN procedures Nos. 18135 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref6">6</xref>], 18122-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref7">7</xref>] and 18130 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref8">8</xref>].</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Particle Size Analysis</title><p>Particle size analysis tests show the following results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>):</p><p>&#183; The Zeta Potential (MV) of the samples plotted in the range of incipient instability.</p><p>&#183; All the samples lie in the clay range of 0.98 &#181;m - 3.9 &#181;m and are very well-sorted according to their standard deviation of 0.09 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>&#183; According to the values of skewness (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), the Dead Sea black muds are found to be near symmetrical; +0.1 to −0.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Stress-Strain Tests</title><p>The stress-strain tests show that the mud has not been exposed to pressure before and thence it has no pre-history of loading. The recovery after stress application was very minor as can be seen from the hysteresis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Particle size analyses of the Dead Sea mud</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skewness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (Avg.) %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.534</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Atterberg Liquid and Plastic Limits</title><p>Liquid and Plastic Limit tests were carried out on the Dead Sea mud samples. The results are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, and show that the mud plots as medium plastic clay of illite composition and illite engineering properties. Also in Atterberg limits diagram DIN18122-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref7">7</xref>], which correlates the Plasticity Limit (PI) with the Liquid Limit LL the mud plots as medium plastic clay TM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Shear Strength Analyses</title><p>Shear strength analyses were carried out on the Dead Sea samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref12">12</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The results give an internal friction angle of 28.15˚ and a low cohesion of 9.33 kN/m<sup>2</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Permeability Test</title><p>The permeability tests on the Dead Sea mud performed at Halle University/Germany using the variable-head permeability test) show that the Dead Sea mud has very low permeability of 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>9</sup> m/s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref5">5</xref>]. This means that the mud is not easily and fast enough drained of water. When the Dead Sea level drops the mud becomes exposed at ground surface and the water in the mud becomes over-pressurized. Here the developed internal pressure assists in cracking the mud and in the drying of the new cracks’ surfaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Landslide Analysis</title><p>Along all wadis incised into the mud formation landslides and land collapses are very common (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Factor of Safety</title><p>Two methods were used to determine the factor of safety (FS) in the study area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>1) Moment equilibrium: FS = Mr/Md</p><p>Where Mr: is the sum of resisting moments and Md: is the sum of driving moments.</p><p>By using the engineering test results of: Shear strength analyses, Atterberg Liquid and Plastic Limits, Stress-strain and permeability tests it was found that the driving forces equal 1220.45 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> N and the resistive forces to equal 718.41 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> N and hence FS = 0.588 which is less than one indicating unstable slopes.</p><p>2) Force equilibrium: FS = Fr/Fd</p><p>Where Fr: is the sum of resisting force and Fd: is the sum of driving force. Here it was found that the driving force = 208.9 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> kN and the resistive force = 102.63 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> kN and hence, FS = 0.49 which is less than one also indicating unstable slope.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Erosion and Destruction</title><p>At present the DS level drops more than one meter per year with a total drop from the 1960s until now of about 35 m. This drop has led to dramatic changes and destruction in the surrounding geomorphic system, especially in the wetland environments which has and is endangering the natural environment and the infrastructure. Severe erosion and undercutting is affecting wadi channels, roads, culverts and construction as can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Engineering Geological Solution</title><p>Engineering geological solution can assist in alleviating the degradation processes along the recently exposed areas as a result of retreating Dead Sea shores. Such solutions cannot be applied all over the area and for all types of degradation. Therefore, for each area and problem specific solution has to be found such as:</p><p>&#183; Changing the geometry of the slope in some areas</p><p>&#183; Providing adequate drainage</p><p>&#183; Constructing retaining walls with proper drainage</p><p>&#183; Construction of reinforced concrete walls</p><p>&#183; Building of gabion walls and terraces. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 terraces and gabions constructed by one of the hotels to alleviate the degradation processes and to stop erosion.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Summary of Results</title><p>Due to lowering of the DS level new land built of two main types of sediments has been exposed namely; coarse gravels underlain by fine-grained mud and consolidated and stable country rocks. The recent sediments of the shores of the Dead Sea are not consolidated and are strongly exposed to erosion and back-ward erosion along wadis, which in turn leads to land collapses and landslides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102551-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Mud deposits at the shores of the Dead Sea are the most vulnerable to such erosional processes and therefore, their mineralogical, hydraulic and geotechnical properties have been the focus of this study with the following results:</p><p>&#183; XRD, XRF and SEM analyses show that the samples contain quartz, calcite, halite, kaolinite, smectite (montmorillonite), illite, gibbsite, and muscovite and are rich in organic matter.</p><p>&#183; The black mud deposits seem to originate from the weathering, erosion, transportation and deposition of older country rocks composed of oil shale which used to cover the surrounding eastern mountains before they were removed by erosion and deposited in the study area.</p><p>&#183; The geotechnical tests show that there is no compression history for the sample with a natural water content of 37.9% that means it is already in the liquid state and can flow by any triggering factor.</p><p>&#183; Engineering geological tests show that the mud has a grain sizes ranging from 0.98 to 3.9 &#181;m, is of very low permeability of 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> m/s, witha plasticity limit of 21.8% and a liquid limit of 37.9%. The internal friction angle measures 28.15˚ and the cohesion 9.33 kN/m<sup>2</sup>, which allow the sample to plot in the illite range of medium plastic clay.</p><p>&#183; Undercutting along the Dead Sea shores and the wadi courses has created instability in the slopes causing their collapses as landslides or rock toppling initiated by shrinkages of the excavated mud deposits due to moisture content losses and formation of deep mud cracks. This all has been assisted by the type of medium plastic clay of illite geologic engineering properties.</p><p>&#183; Head-ward erosion along the wadis has created steep slopes, which has started to severely affect the infrastructure of roads, culverts construction etc.</p><p>&#183; Engineering geologic solutions to the degrading geology has become imperative in the case of the northeastern shores of the Dead Sea.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The retreat of the DS exposed unstable new coastal areas which, before, were under sea. The black muds are generally of horizontal bedding as exposed along wadis which deepened their curses by head-ward erosion due to the drop in the level of the DS. Land collapses and landslides developed and strongly affected the sides of wadis and areas at the DS shores, threatening herewith the infrastructure of roads, bridges and buildings.</p><p>Drying of surface exposures of the black mud reduces the water content to below the plasticity limit of 21.8%, causing vertical crakes in these surface exposures. The very low permeability of the mud accompanied by fast drop in the Dead Sea level created water over-pressure within the mud helping here within the formation of deep cracks in the mud which, assisted with wadi courses deep incisions by erosion, have led to sliding processes and rock toppling.</p><p>At present, the area is strongly suffering of geologic degradation which is causing damage to the environment and to the infrastructure in the area.</p><p>Unless immediate solutions are applied to alleviate the impacts, catastrophes are awaiting the area in the form of road and building damages.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to extend their sincere thanks to Dr. Stefan Geyer, University of Halle, Germany for his help in analyzing the rock samples and for his support and constructive suggestions.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>Both authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the present manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alhaj, W.A. and Salameh, E. (2020) Geotechnical and Mineralogical Properties of the Recently Exposed Black Mud Deposits along the Northeastern Shore of the Dead Sea. Open Journal of Geology, 10, 943-956. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.108042</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102551-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salameh, E. and Nasser, H. (1999) Does the Actual Drop in Dead Sea Level Reflect the Development of Water Sources within Its Drainage Basin? Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 27, 5-11.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-401X(199901)27:1&lt;5::AID-AHEH5&gt;3.0.CO;2-Z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Salameh, E. and Nasser, H. (2005) Retreat of the Dead Sea and Its Effects on the Surrounding Groundwater Resources and the Stability of Its Coastal Deposits. In: Hoetzl, H., Ed., Sustainable Use of Water Resources along the Lower Jordan River, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AbouKaraki, N., Closson, D., Salameh, E., de Schoutheete de Tervarent, M. and Barjous, M. (2005) Natural, Induced and Environmental Hazards along the Dead Sea Coast, Jordan. Journal of Hydrogeology and Environment, 33, 1-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Filin, S., Avni, Y., Baruch, A., Morik, S., Arav, R. and Marco, S. (2014) Characterization of Land Degradation along the Receding Dead Sea Coastal Zone Using Airborne Laser Scanning, Geomorphology, 206, 403-420.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salameh, E., Al-Raggad, M. and Amaireh, M. (2019) Degradation Processes along the New Northeastern Shores of the Dead Sea. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8155-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN 18135 (German Industrial Norms) (2012) Soil-Investigation and Testing-Oedometer Consolidation Test.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN 18122-1 (German Industrial Norms) (1997) Soil, Investigation and Testing-Consistency Limits Part 1: Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN 18130 (German Industrial Norms) (1998) Soil, Investigation and Testing-Determination of the Coefficient of Water Permeability Part 1: Laboratory Tests.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2015) Google Earth Maps, Landsat Images of Geomorphology.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hunt, R.E. (2005) Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Handbook. 2nd Edition, Taylor &amp; Francis, Boca Raton, 1066 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folk, R.L., William, C. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River Bar: A Study in the Significance of Grain Size Parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 27, 3-26.  
https://doi.org/10.1306/74D70646-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Brook, N. (1993) The Measurement and Estimation of Basic Rock Strength. In: Hudson, J., Ed., Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042066-0.50009-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hencher, S.R. and Knipe, R.J. (2007) Development of Rock Joints with Time and Consequences for Engineering. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Vol. 1, 223-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hencher, S.R. (2011) Practical Engineering Geology. Applied Geotechnics Vol. 4, Taylor and Francis, Spon Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12836</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wyllie, D.C. and Mah, C.W. (2004) Rock Slope Engineering. 4th Edition, E &amp; FN Spon, London, 431.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blockley, D.I. (2011) Engineering Safety. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic Engineering, 164, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1680/feng.2011.164.1.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102551-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ollier, C.D. (2010) Very Deep Weathering and Related Landslides. In: Calceterra, D. and Parise, M., Eds., Weathering as a Predisposing Factor to Slope Movements, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications 23, 5-14.  
https://doi.org/10.1144/EGSP23.2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>