<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2020.85024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-102252</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical and Thermal Characterization of a Lignocellulosic Fiber, Extracted from the Bast of &lt;i&gt;Cola lepidota&lt;/i&gt; Stem
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ndoumou</surname><given-names>Belinga Rémy Legrand</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meva’a</surname><given-names>Lucien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouagne</surname><given-names>Pierre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Betene</surname><given-names>Ebanda Fabien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noah</surname><given-names>Pierre Marcel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atangana</surname><given-names>Ateba Jean</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratoire Génie de Production (LGP), ENI de Tarbes, Tarbes, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratoire d’Ingénierie Civile et Mécanique, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroun</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Mécanique (LME), UFD SI, Université de Douala, Douala, Cameroun</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>377</fpage><lpage>392</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this research work, fiber extracted from the bark of 
  Cola 
  lepidota (
  CL) plant, grown in the flora of Southern part of Cameroon, was investigated for composites reinforcement. The investigation was carried via evaluation of 
  water absorption capacity, moisture content, real density, porosity, chemical composition, chemical structure and thermal behaviour. It was discovered that the new fiber has relatively low moisture content and water absorption capacity similar to those of other investigated natural fibers such as flax, sisal, coconut, hemp and jute. Its porosity was found appropriate for composite production and the fiber was found to be thermally stable up to 230&#176;C, with maximum degradation temperature of 325&#176;C. The main constituents of the fibre include cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. In conclusion, based on the properties investigated, this fiber is considered suitable for composite manufacture.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Cola lepidota&lt;/i&gt; Fiber</kwd><kwd> Thermal Stability</kwd><kwd> Physico-Chemical Characteristics</kwd><kwd> FTIR-ATR</kwd><kwd> Liber</kwd><kwd> Stem</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The valorization of plant biomass through the use of ligneous resources for the design and production of composite structures is a current issue in the research sector and applications in automotive, construction, goods and leisure industries are more and more observable. This visibility is demonstrated by the manufacturing of equipments such as: prostheses, tennis rackets, turbine blades, vehicle doors, shutters and roofs, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref2">2</xref>]. Moreover, the use of products obtained from these materials is in line with the Kyoto Protocol’s requirements for sustainable development and environmental protection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref3">3</xref>]. Thus, the rush to substitute synthetic fibers with natural fibers in composite structures is justified.</p><p>Apart from their eco-friendly aspect, biofibers stand out for remarkable specific mechanical properties and relatively low cost [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>]. However, their qualities depend on the quality of the fabrication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref5">5</xref>]. The choice of the manufacturing process of an ecological composite requires the knowledge of some fundamental elements. Thermal behaviours such as the maximum degradation temperature and the thermal stability range of the fiber are indispensable. Physical characteristics like porosity, density and water absorption capacity have to be specified. In addition to these parameters, crystallinity rate and chemical composition of the fibre will be an undeniable asset.</p><p>The natural fibers characteristics depend on a number of factors like the age of the plant from which the fibers are extracted, the part of the plant where the fibers are located (leaf, fruit, stem) and the fibers extraction technique used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>]. The plant fibers most widely used as reinforcement for composite materials are flax, sisal, hemp, jute and kenaf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>]. This use is justified by their durability in the textile field, their availability and their specific properties. However, with the increase of demand in green materials combined to the decrease of growing space for these common plant fibers, and the race towards new tropical species which are accessible and at lower cost, some recent scientific works have been carried out in this field. Researches enabled to study new plant fibers such as those derived from pineapple leaves (PALF) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref8">8</xref>], Rhectophyllum camerunense roots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>], Okra stems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref9">9</xref>], Triumfetta cordifolia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>], Sida cordifolia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref11">11</xref>], Arundo donax [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>], Lygeum spartum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>], Coccinia grandis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref12">12</xref>] for their use as reinforcement for composite materials.</p><p>The presented work investigates the properties of fibers extracted from the bast of Cola lepidota stem. They are characterized in order to choose the resin and the process for manufacturing a composite membrane reinforced by this tropical fiber. In South Cameroon, they are traditionally used to make hood ropes because of their resistance and workability.</p><p>In this article, the fiber extraction procedure was presented. The real density was assessed by using the helium pycnometry technique. Porosity was evaluated by density methods. Water content, organic and mineral matter content and water absorption capacity were calculated according to ASTM D1576-13, ASTM E1755-01 and ASTM D 5229 standards, respectively. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) was used to determine chemical structure and crystallinity index of the fiber. Cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, lignin and extractives contents were determined by using TAPPI test methods. Thermal behaviour was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) coupled with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using a STA 449F3 Jupiter from the German NETZSCH&#174; brand.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Raw Material</title><p>The fibers studied in this work come from the bark of the stem of cola tree, genus Cola lepidota. They have been collected in the forest of Ebemewoman 2, a village located in the Southern part of Cameroon. This plant is mainly known by its fruit which contains white, sweet and edible arillus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) called “monkey cola” or “ivoe” in its local language. It belongs to the Sterculiaceae family. It is an undergrowth shrub reaching 15 m in height and 25 cm in diameter; it has a humpy shaft and a slightly branched crown; its particularity is its bark: greyish-green to brown, its straight section shows a whitish slice with yellowish-brown lines and exuding a yellowish secretion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref13">13</xref>]. This coloration is visible on the extracted raw fibers.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Fibers Extraction</title><p>Stagnant water retting procces was used to extract fibers. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> illustrates the differents steps of the CL fiber extraction procedure.</p><p>The fibers were collected on the main stem, specifically in central part in order to obtain optimal characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>]. Stems with an average diameter of 10 cm were selected to perform the collection of bast.</p><p>The barks of CL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) were detached from the stem and exposed to the open air for two days for allowing binding agent of phloem to dry and facilitate the extraction process. Then, they were entirely submerged into a tank filled with water at ambient temperature for 4 weeks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)) to undergo biological degradation. At the end of this period, the fiber bundles were loosed. They were then lightly hand whashed and rinsed several times with clean water to remove any external matter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e)). The resulting product was spread out and dried in the room for one week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f)). We obtained bundles of yellowish-coloured fibers, soft and smooth to the touch with a grid texture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(g)). The fiber bundles were combed to obtain a continuous ribbon; which is the CL fiber (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(h)).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Characterization Methods</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Densities and Porosities Measurements</title><p>The real density was determined with the technique of helium pycnometry as described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>]. The obtained value was verified by an evaluation of the density by the simple Rule of Mixture (ROM) by applying Equation (1).</p><p>ρ ROM ≈ 1 ( %cell ρ cell + %hcell ρ hcell + %lig ρ lig + %pec ρ pec ) (1)</p><p>where, %cell, %hcell, %lig and %pec stand for mass fractions of Cellulose, H&#233;micellulose, Lignin and Pectin respectively obtained by chemical composition of the fiber; ρ cell , ρ hcell , ρ lig and ρ pec used for densities of Cellulose, Hemicellulose, Lignin and Pectin respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>Apparent (bulk) density was determined with the Archimedes method. It represents the mass of the fiber per unit of total volume including voids and inter-granular porosities. It is evaluated according to the ASTM D792 standard. After being dried for 48 hours in an oven at 65˚C until the mass has stabilized, the fiber clumps were cooled in a desiccator and then weighed on a Sartorius (1/10,000g) analytical balance. They were then coated with paraffin and reweighed before being immersed in a graduated test tube containing the solvent.</p><p>The porosity of fiber was evaluated by the density methods as described by Mwaikambo and Ansell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref16">16</xref>] by applying Equation (2).</p><p>P ( % ) = ( 1 − ρ a ρ r ) &#215; 100 (2)</p><p>where, ρ a and ρ r represent the apparent and the real density of fiber in g/cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Water Absorption</title><p>The protocol described by Nadlene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref17">17</xref>] was performed to determine the CL fibers water absorption. Previously dehydrated fibres were weighed M<sub>0</sub> (g) and held in a desiccator containing fresh water for 24 hours. They were then removed and placed in the centrifuge set at 500 rpm for 30 seconds to be drained before weighing M<sub>1</sub> (g). Water absorption values were calculated by Equation (3).</p><p>W Abs 24 ( % ) = M 1 − M 0 M 0 &#215; 100 (3)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Moisture Content</title><p>ASTM D1576-13 standard was used to evaluate the moisure content of CL fibers. Fiber samples previously exposed for 24 hours in a temperature controlled room of 27˚C &#177; 2˚C with 65% relative humidity of air were weighed M<sub>0</sub> (g). They were then dehydrated for 24 hours in a 105˚C controlled oven and re-weighed M<sub>1</sub> (g). The moisture content is defined by:</p><p>W ( % ) = M 0 − M 1 M 1 &#215; 100 (4)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Organic and Mineral Matter Contents</title><p>The mineral content was determined by calcination according to ASTM E1755-01 standard. Fibers were ground and sieved. A mass of 1.5 g with a size of 315 &#181;m was dehydrated in an oven at 65˚C for 48 hours and weighed M<sub>1</sub> (g). They were then placed in an empty ceramic crucible weighed M<sub>0</sub> (g) and then introduced into Naberther furnace set at 550˚C for 4 hours. After this time, the assembly was cooled in a desiccator and weighed M<sub>2</sub> (g). The mineral content was evaluated by the relation 5.</p><p>M min ( % ) = M 2 − M 0 M 1 − M 0 &#215; 100 (5)</p><p>Organic content was deduced from Equation (5) by:</p><p>M org ( % ) = 100 − M min (6)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) Spectrometry</title><p>Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) technique was carried out to determine the functional groups and chemical bonds present on the CL fiber. Infrared spectrum was recorded using a BRUKER ALPHA spectrometer operating in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode and controlled by Opus Lab v 7.0 122 software. Acquisitions were carried out by performing 200 scans in the frequency range 4000 and 400 cm<sup>−1</sup>, at spectral resolution of 4 cm<sup>−1</sup>. Fiber bundles were chopped, ground and dried. Then, a mass of 1 g was used for this purpose.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_6"><title>2.3.6. Evaluation of Crystallinity Index by FTIR-ATR</title><p>Crystallinity index (CrI) of the new fiber was evaluated by calculating the lateral order index (LOI) also called O’Connor crystallinity index from the FTIR-ATR spectrum of fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>]. In this work the ratio of the absorption band I<sub>1422</sub>/I<sub>898</sub> seems to be more suitable for evaluating the CrI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>]. The LOI is computed by the relation 7.</p><p>LOI = I 1422 I 898 (7)</p><p>where, I 1422 and I 898 represent the intensity of the FTIR-ATR peaks at 1422 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 898 cm<sup>−1</sup> absorption band respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_7"><title>2.3.7. Chemical Composition</title><p>Chemical composition of CL fibers was carried out in accordance with (TAPPI) methods based on successive extraction of the components of the fibrous material by solvents as described by Sango [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]. This technique consits in isolating the different substances contained in the fiber. Ethanol-benzene extraction was first done. It was used to remove components such as dyes, wax, fats and lipids which are generally found in vegetable fibers. It was carried out with Soxhlet on previously dehydrated and crushed fibers. Then, hot water extraction was carried out to remove the residues of extractables still present in the sample obtained after extraction with ethanol-benzene and to solubilize all the mineral matter contained in the fiber. The pectin extraction was the third to be carried out. The residue from the previous extraction was heated in a water bath under reflux at 80˚C while stirring with 2% of hydrochloric acid solution. Then, holocelullose (substance consisting of mixture of cellulose and hemicellulose) was extracted by total delignification of the sample obtained after extraction of the pectins by using 1% sodium hydroxide solution. The extraction of cellulose was the last step of the process: the previous holocellulose sample was dissolved in a 17.5% (w/w) NaOH solution and then diluted in the same 8.75% (w/w) NaOH solution. The solid residue obtained was successively washed with 1% acetic acid solution and distilled water. Hemicellulose content was deduced directly by subtracting cellulose content from that of holocellulose. A mass of 5 g of ground and dried fiber was used.</p><p>Lignin content was determined by the KLASON method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref22">22</xref>]. A sample of 1 g of residue taken after pectins extraction was hydrolysed in 72% sulphuric acid solution, then heated under reflux in 3% sulphuric acid solution before being cooled and rinsed thoroughly with hot distilled water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_8"><title>2.3.8. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric (TG) Analysis</title><p>Thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetry analysis were used to evaluate the thermal stability and thermal decomposition of CL fibers. For this investigation, STA 449F3 Jupiter instrument of the German brand NETZSCH was used. A mass of 5 g of raw fiber powder with particle size of 200 &#181;m was heated from 36˚C to 697˚C at a heating rate of 10˚C/min in air atmosphere.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physical Properties</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Water Absorption</title><p>Water absorption capacity of raw CL fiber is 172%. This content is closest from that of common natural fibers such as: alfa fibre 158% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref23">23</xref>], flax 136% &#177; 25%, hemp 158% &#177; 30%, sisal 200%, jute 281% and coconut 180% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref24">24</xref>], which are generally used as reinforcement for composites. This relatively low rate could indicate a low porosity of the fiber and might contribute to good mechanical resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref5">5</xref>]. This water absorption capacity also indicated the existence of free hydroxyl group, which attracts water molecules from the surrounding environment through hydrogen bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref25">25</xref>]. These hydroxyl groups are responsible for the presence of hemicelluloses molecules in the fiber as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. This content could inspire cautions that should be taken into account before the manufacturing of composites made from this fiber.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Moisture Content</title><p>The average moisture content of CL fibers is 6.47%. This relatively low value content would predispose to good fiber-resin interaction in the manufacture of composite materials reinforced with the new lignocellulosic resource. A product made from this fiber would offer good comfort feeling because it will absorb less than 7% moisture content, very close to that of cotton and flax [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref23">23</xref>]. It is reported in litterature that high moisture content undermine the stability of the composite in terms of dimensions, tensile strength, swelling behaviour and porosity formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref17">17</xref>]. Therefore, lower moisture content is desirable.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Organic and Mineral Matter Content</title><p>The organic and mineral contents of CL fibers are 97.68% and 2.32% respectively. This ash content shows that the new fiber might have good fire resistance capacity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref26">26</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Densities and Porosities</title><p>The real density of the CL fiber evaluated with the helium pycnometer is about 1.7266 &#177; 0.0146 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. This value is close to that of cotton (1.6 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref27">27</xref>].</p><p>Using the ROM law yields, we obtained 1.6368 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, which correlates with the value obtained by the helium pycnometry technique.</p><p>The apparent density evaluated using the Archimedes thrust principle is about 1.205 &#177; 0.2941 g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>Applying Equation (2), porosity fraction of CL fiber is between 13% and 47%. Although useful in applications where shock and vibration damping are required, and in resin impregnation during composite manufacturing, large porosities have detrimental impact on the mechanical properties of composite materials because they promote early failure of the parts due to the appearance areas of stress concentration and the reduction of effective cross-section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows porosities and densities of some common natural fibers used as reinforcement in composite materials.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. FTIR-ATR Analysis</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the FTIR-ATR spectrum of CL raw fiber and indicates the position of main absorption peaks while <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents functional groups and chemical bonds assigned to these mains points.</p><p>IR spectrum of CL shows similarities with that of well-known lignocellulosic materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]. Rekmarkable peaks are observed at wave numbers 3328, 2919, 2163, 1730, 1236, 1007, 1422, 1506, 1367 and 1236 cm<sup>−1</sup> respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Some porosities and densities of common natural fibers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Apparent density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Real density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Porosity %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.205 &#177; 0.2941</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7266 &#177; 0.0146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 - 47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.468</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coconut</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.261 - 1.422</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.01 - 50.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref28">28</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref5">5</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sisal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Peak locations and respective functional groups for CL fiber</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peak positions (Wavenumber (cm<sup>−1</sup>))</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Corresponding chemical functional group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OH stretching vibration of polysaccharides and water hydration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref29">29</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CH and CH<sub>2</sub> Stretching and vibrating of cellulose and hemicellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref30">30</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ester or carboxylic acid (C=O) symetric stretching vibration of Xylanes and/or lignin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1506</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(C=C) stretching and vibrating of lignin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1422</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CH<sub>2</sub> symetric stretching and bending of cellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetyl group (-COO) of hemicellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(C-OH) Vibration and deformation of lignin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >898</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-O group of monosaccharides</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The peak at 3328 cm<sup>−1</sup> is attributed to the presence of polysaccharides and hydration water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref29">29</xref>]. The one observe at 2919 cm<sup>−1</sup> is associated to the C-H stretching vibration from CH and CH<sub>2</sub> in cellulose and hemicellulose components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref30">30</xref>]. Absorption band centered at 1730 cm<sup>−1</sup> corresponds to symetric stretching of ester or carboxylic acid groups (C=O) of xylans and/or lignin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]. The peak observed at 1506 cm<sup>−1</sup> is attributed to carbon double bond (C=C) and the vibrations of polyphenolic groups responsible of lignin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]. The absorbance band at 1422 cm<sup>−1</sup> is associated to CH<sub>2</sub> symetric bending present in cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]. Moreover, the two peaks presented at 1367 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 1318 cm<sup>−1</sup> are assigned respectively to bending vibration of (C-H) and (C-O) groups of aromatic ring in the polysaccharides while the absorption peak centered at 1236 cm<sup>−1</sup> corresponds to (-COO) group of hemicellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref30">30</xref>]. The high absorbance at 1006 cm<sup>−1</sup> is assigned to (C-OH) stretch of lignin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]. Finally, the little peak at 898 cm<sup>−1</sup> can be assigned to β-1,4 glycosidic linkage of (C-O) groups of cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>Thus, the above analysis clairly proved that CL fibers are mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, lignin and water.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Crystallinity Index Analysis</title><p>From IR spectrum analysis illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and the description presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref32">32</xref>], it can be confirmed that cellulose I and II mixture, cellulose II and amorphous cellulose predominate in CL fiber.</p><p>The absorbance observed at 1422 cm<sup>−1</sup> corresponds to the crystalline structure of cellulose II, while that at 898 cm<sup>−1</sup> corresponds to its amorphous structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref29">29</xref>]. The Lateral Order Index (LOI) shows the order of crystallinity rather than the amount of crystalline cellulose relative to the amorphous components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref33">33</xref>]. It is noted that in a sample composed mainly of cellulose II, LOI increases with a decreasing crystallinity of the fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>O’Connor’s crystallinity index of the CL fiber is around 42%. It is smaller than that of linden 96%, althaea 79%, ferula 70%, conium maculatum 101% imperata brasiliensis 45.39% for which crystallinity index obtained by X-ray diffraction technique using Segal’s empirical formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] is 68% for althaea fibre, 53% for linden fibre, 55.7% for conium maculatum fibre and 36.6% for imperata brasiliensis fibre [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref20">20</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Chemical Composition</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the result of chemical composition of CL fibers. The obtained values are compared to those previously reported in the literature for other lignocellulosic fibers used as a reinforcement for eco-composites structure.</p><p>CL fiber is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin which occupied more than 80% of the constituent fractions. This result correlates with that shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> when thermal analysis of the fiber is performed. The cellulose content in CL fibre is closest to that of kenaf, jute, abaca fibres [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] and higher than that of fibres such as esparto, diss, banana or coconut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref24">24</xref>], which are annual plants.</p><p>On the other hand, the lignin content obtained in the new fiber is similar to that of Rhectophyllum camerunense fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>] and unlike most fibres of the same nature. This value is relatively high and may be linked to the low moisture content found above [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref33">33</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition of CL and some common natural fibers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulose %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hemicellulose %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lignin %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pectin %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Extractives %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*CL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abaca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 - 63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref34">34</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alfa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref35">35</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 - 75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coconut</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 - 14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref34">34</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 - 72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 - 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref27">27</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 - 74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref6">6</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*RC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref1">1</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sisal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 - 78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref27">27</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*RC: Rhectophyllum camerunense, *CL: Cola lepidota, *TC: Triumfetta cordifolia.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Thermal Analysis</title><sec id="s3_5_1"><title>3.5.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) shows combined thermogravimetric (TG) and its derivative thermographimetric (DTG) curves obtained at the thermal analysis of CL raw fiber.</p><p>TG curve clearly illustrates the decrease in weight with increasing temperature.This process is carried out in four stages.</p><p>The first stage occurs from 68˚C up to 154˚C. It is characterised by a weight loss of 7.27% due to the dehydration of fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] and evaporation of volatile substances such as alcohols, aldehydes, esters, organic acids, aliphatic hydrocarbons and the phenol groups present in the raw fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref25">25</xref>]. Above 154˚C up to 230˚C a little loss in weight is observed. This range represents the thermal stability of the fiber. The second stage is between 230˚C and 380˚C with a loss weight of 69.15%. At this stage, two main points are seen: the first between 280˚C and 300˚C a dip point is attributed to the decomposition of hemicelluloses, pectins and glycosidic bonds of cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>]; the second, a peak, observed at 325˚C corresponds to the maximum decomposition of the fiber. It is attributed to the degradation of cellulose I and celluloses present in the fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>]. The third stage is between 380˚C and 490˚C. It is characterised by a weight loss of 20.66% attributed to the total decomposition of cellulose followed by that of the lignin and the other aromatic compounds of the fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>]. It is reported that thermal decomposition of cellulose is from 350˚C up to 375˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref17">17</xref>], while lignin, because of its complex structure, degrades slowly as the temperature rises in the sample. However, lignin is subject to significant degradation in the range 280˚C - 500˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref37">37</xref>]. The fourth stage takes place above 490˚C, the weight no longer varies and the fiber is completely calcined. The residual weight rate is 10.19%.</p><p>A similar behaviour to that described above has already been reported by some works on other natural fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> summarizes the thermal properties derived from TG-DTG whereas <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> contains the deduced chemical constituent of CL fiber obtained from TGA-DTGA results given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> presents the thermal properties of CL fibre in comparison with other common natural fibres used as reinforcement of composite materials.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5_2"><title>3.5.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Analysis</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) shows combined TG-DTG-DSC curves of CL raw fiber while <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> summurizes its thermal properties obtained from DSC analysis. The DSC thermogram shows three main peaks: two exothermic straight peaks and one endothermic peak. The endothermic peak is observed at around 68˚C and corresponds to dehumidification of the fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref39">39</xref>]. The exothermic peaks are observed around 320˚C and 340˚C for the first and around 400˚C and 410˚C for the second. These peaks might successively be assigned to thermal degradation and decomposition temperatures of cellulose and lignin present in CL fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref40">40</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Thermal properties from TG-DTG of CL fibre</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Degradation temperature, ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Thermal stability range, ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Residual char, %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>IDT</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>MDT</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>FDT</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[154 - 230]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.19</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*IDT: Initial decomposition temperature, *MDT: Maximum decomposition temperature, *FDT: Final decomposition temperature.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> TG-DTG deduced chemical contents of CL fiber</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Chemical compounds (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulose + Hemicellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lignin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volatiles</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.27</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Thermal properties of CL fibers and some others</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial decomposition temperature, ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum decomposition temperature ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Residual char, %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ref</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.19 (600˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prosopis juliﬂora bark</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lyguem spartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >338.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.51 (600˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref4">4</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Okra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >359</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref9">9</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.49 (900˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.69 (900˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref9">9</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >339.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Thermal characteristics obtain from DSC analysis of raw CL fiber</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Degradation temperature of fiber components ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Melt temperature of fiber water, ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glass transition temperature of the fiber, ˚C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>d </sub>cellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>d </sub>lignine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>Onset</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>g</sub> fibre</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T<sub>d</sub> cellulose: degradation temperature of the cellulose of the fiber, T<sub>d</sub> lignin: degradation temperature of the lignin of the fiber, T<sub>g</sub> fiber: glass transition temperature of the fiber.</p><p>The melting temperature of water presents in the fibre (T<sub>onset</sub>) is read from the graph by matching the extrapolated beginning of the curve by the intersection point of the tangent with the point of maximum slope on the principal side of the peak with the base line extrapolated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102252-ref40">40</xref>]. On the same way, glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>) is derived by a second order transition point. These methods allowed to find at around 108˚C and 246˚C respectively for T<sub>onset</sub> and T<sub>g</sub>.</p><p>It is worthy of note that CL fibers are stable until around 230˚C. This value is close than those of the average values of other common natural fibers as illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. Thus, this new lignocellulosic fiber can be used with thermoset or thermoplastic polymer matrix under this temperature.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper a new lignocellulosic fiber extracted from the bark of Cola lepidota stem is examined in order to evaluate the possibility of using them as eco-composite. Evaluation of water absorption capacity, moisture content, real density by helium pycnometer, porosity, chemical composition, chemical structure by FTIR-ATR, and thermal behaviour by TGA-DTG-DSC are some of the parameters investigated in this study. The salient results show that:</p><p>- CL fibers have a relatively low moisture content and its absorption capacity is similar to those of widely used common natural fibers such as flax, sisal, coconut, hemp and jute;</p><p>- The porosity of the fiber is between 13% and 47%, which is appropriate for a good impregnation of low viscosity resin during the manufacture of an eco-composite;</p><p>- More than 80% of the fiber consists of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin;</p><p>- The fiber is thermally stable up to 230˚C with a maximum degradation temperature at around 325˚C; which is suitable for thermocompression molding with synthetic or natural polymeric resin;</p><p>- The result of chemical composition is consistent with that of the thermal behaviour study and correlates with those obtained at the evaluation of physical properties.</p><p>In perspective, a study is envisaged to implement a composite reinforced by this fiber and to characterize it.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Our thanks go to Jean-Bosco Saha Tchinda and Herman Assonfack Lekane of the Laboratory of Macromolecular Applied Chemistry Unit, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Yaounde 1, for their availability and practical advice.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Legrand, N.B.R., Lucien, M., Pierre, O., Fabien, B.E., Marcel, N.P. and Jean, A.A. (2020) Physico-Chemical and Thermal Characterization of a Lignocellulosic Fiber, Extracted from the Bast of Cola lepidota Stem. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 8, 377-392. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2020.85024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102252-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Béakou, A., Ntenga, R., Lepetit, J., Atéba, J.A. and Ayina, L.O. (2008) Physico-Chemical and Microstructural Characterization of “Rhectophyllum camerunense” Plant Fiber. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 39, 67-74.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malha, M. (2013) Mise en ceuvre, caractérisation et modélisation de matériaux composite: Polymère thermoplastique renforcé par des fibres de Doum. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Mohammed V-Agdal, Rabat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demaze, M.T. (2009) Le protocole de Kyoto, le clivage nord-sud et le défi du développement durable. Espace Geographique, éditions Belin, Paris, 139-156. 
https://doi.org/10.3917/eg.382.0139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belouadah, Z., Ati, A. and Rokbi, M. (2015) Characterization of New Cellulosic Fiber from Lygeum spartum L. Carbohydrate Polymers, 134, 429-437. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tossou, E. (2019) Développement de nouveaux composites hybrides renforcés par des fibres de carbone et de lin: Μise en οeuvre et Caractérisation mécanique. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charlet, K. (2006) Contribution à l’étude de composites unidirectionnels renforcés par des fibres de lin: Relation entre la microstructure de la fibre et ses propriétés mécaniques. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Caen, Caen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fiore, V., Scalici, T. and Valenza, A. (2014) Characterization of a New Natural Fiber from Arundo donax L. as Potential Reinforcement of Polymer Composites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 106, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jawaid, M., Asim, M., Tahir, P.M. and Nasir, M. (2020) Pineapple Leaf Fibers. Processing, Properties and Applications. Springer Nature Singapore Private Ltd., Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1416-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Rosa, I.M., Kenny, J.M., Puglia, D., Santulli, C. and Sarasini, F. (2010) Morphological, Thermal and Mechanical Characterization of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Fibers as Potential Reinforcement in Polymer Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 70, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mewoli, A.E., Segovia, C, Betene Ebanda, F., Ateba, A., Noah, P.M.A., Ndiwe, B. and Njom, A. (2020) Physical-Chemical and Mechanical Characterization of the Bast Fibers of Triumfetta cordifolia A. Rich from the Equatorial Region of Cameroon. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 8, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2020.84011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manimaran, P., Prithiviraj, M., Saravanakumar, S.S., Arthanarieswaran, V.P. and Senthamaraikannan, P. (2017) Physicochemical, Tensile, and Thermal Characterization of New Natural Cellulosic Fibers from the Stems of Sida cordifolia. Journal of Natural Fibers, 15, 860-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.1376301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jebadurai, S.G., Raj, R.E., Sreenivasan, V.S. and Binoj, J.S. (2018) Comprehensive Characterization of Natural Cellulosic Fiber from Coccinia grandis Stem. Carbohydrate Polymers, 207, 675-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eyog Matig, O., Ndoye, O., Kengue. J. and Awono, A. (2006) Les fruitiers forestiers comestibles du Cameroun. Rapport IPGRI, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssefian, S. and Rahbar, N. (2015) Molecular Origin of Strength and Stiffness in Bamboo Fibrils. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 11116. 
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Incropera, F., De Witt, D.P., Bergman, T.L. and Lavine, A.S. (2006) Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 6th Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mwaikambo, L.Y. and Ansell, M.P. (2001) The Determination of Porosity and Cellulose Content of Plant Fibres by Density Methods. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 20, 2095-2096. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013703809964</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadlene, R., Sapuan, S.M., Jawaid, M., Ishak, M.R. and Yusriah, L. (2015) Material Characterization of Roselle Fiber (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as Potential Reinforcement Material for Polymer Composites. Fibers &amp; Textiles in Eastern Europe, 6, 23-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, M.L. and O’Connor, R.T. (1964) Relation of Certain Infrared Bands to Cellulose Crystallinity and Crystal Lattice Type. Part I. Spectra of Lattice Types I, II, III and of Amorphous Cellulose. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 8, 1311-1324.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080322</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilin&amp;#231; A.&amp;#199;., K&amp;#214;ktas, S., Seki, Y., Atagür, M., Dalmis, R., Erdogan, ü.H., G&amp;#214;ktas A.A. and Seydibeyoglu, M. (2018) Extraction and Investigation of Lightweight and Porous Natural Fiber from Conium maculatum as a Potential Reinforcement for Composite Materials in Transportation. Composites Part B: Engineering, 140, 1-8. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Carvalho Benini, K.C.C., Voorwald, H.J.C., Cioffi, M.O.H., Milanese, A.C., Heitor, L. and Ornaghi, J.R. (2016) Characterization of a New Lignocellulosic Fiber from Brazil: Imperata brasiliensis (Brazilian Satintail) as an Alternative Source for Nanocellulose Extraction. Journal of Natural Fibers, 14, 112-125.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2016.1167647</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sango, T., Yona, A.M.C., Duchatel, L., Marin, A., Ndikontar, M.K., Joly, N. and Lefebvre, J.M. (2018) Step-Wise Multi-Scale Deconstruction of Banana Pseudo-Stem (Musa acuminata) Biomass and Morpho-Mechanical Characterization of Extracted Long Fibres for Sustainable Applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 122, 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearl, I.A. (1967) The Chemistry of Lignin. Marcell Dekker, New York, 339.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dallel, M. (2012) Evaluation du potentiel textile des fibres d’Alfa (Stipa tenacissima L.) caractérisation Physico-Chimique de lafibre au fil. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Haute Alsace, Mulhouse.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Page, J. (2017) Formulation et caractérisation d’un composite cimentaire bio-fibré pour des procédés de construction préfabriquée. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Normandie, Normandie.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gon&amp;#231;alvesa, A.P.B., De Mirandaa, C.S., Guimar&amp;#227;esa, D.H., Oliveiraa, J.C., Cruza, A.M.F., Da Silvaa, F.L.B.M., Luporinia, S. and Joséa, N.M. (2015) Physicochemical, Mechanical and Morphologic Characterization of Purple Banana Fibers. Materials Research, 18, 205-209. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.366414</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapple, S. and Anandjiwala, R. (2010) Flammability of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites and Strategies for Fire Retardancy: A Review. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 23, 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705709356338</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akil, H.M., Omar, M.F., Mazuki, A.A.M., Safiee, S., Ishak, Z.A.M. and Abu Bakar, A. (2011) Kenaf Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Review. Materials &amp; Design, 32, 4107-4121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Da Luz, F.S. and Monteiro, S.N. (2017) Analysis of Coir Fiber Porosity. Springer International Publishing, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sbiai, A. (2011) Matériaux composite à matrice époxyde chargée par des fibres de palmier dattier: Effet de l’oxydation au tempo sur les fibres. Thèse de Doctorat, Université INSA-Lyon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, H., Memon, H., Hassan, E.A.M., Miah, M.S. and Ali, M.A. (2019) Effect of Jute Fiber Modification on Mechanical Properties of Jute Fiber Composite. Materials, 12, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081226</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fiore, V., Scalici, T. and Valenza, A. (2011) Artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L.) Fibres as Potential Reinforcement of Composite Structures. Composites Science and Technology, 71, 1138-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Sunol, J.J. and Saurina, J. (2004) Structural FTIR Analysis and Thermal Characterisation of Lyocell and Viscose-Type Fibres. European Polymer Journal, 40, 2229-2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seki, Y., Seki, Y., Sarikanat, M., Sever, K., Durmuskahya, C. and Ebru, B. (2014) Evaluation of Linden Fibre as a Potential Reinforcement Material for Polymer Composites. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 45, 1221-1238. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083714557055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marta, F.V., Elias, B., Christoph, B., Alexander, B. and Koon-Yang, L. (2017) Plant Fibre-Reinforced Polymers: Where Do We Stand in Terms of Tensile Properties? International Materials Rewies.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Abbassi, F.E., Assarar, M., Ayad, R., Bourmaud, A. and Baley, C. (2020) A Review on Alfa Fibre (Stipa tenacissima L.): From the Plant Architecture to the Reinforcement of Polymer Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 128, Article ID: 105677. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gurunathan, T., Mohanty, S. and Nayak, S.K. (2015) A Review of the Recent Developmentsin Biocomposites Based on Natural Fibres and Their Application Perspectives. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 77, 1-25. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, K., Risse, M., Das, K.C. and Worley, J. (2009) Determination of Composition of Cellulose and Lignin Mixtures Using Thermogravimetric Analysis. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 131, 219-226.  
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3120349</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saravanakumar, S.S., Kumaravel, A., Nagarajan, T., Sudhakar, P. and Baskaran, R. (2013) Characterization of a Novel Natural Cellulosic Fiber from Prosopis juliflora Bark. Carbohydrate Polymers, 92, 1928-1933. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ganapathy, T., Sathiskumar, R., Senthamaraikannan, P., Saravanakumar, S.S. and Khan, A. (2019) Characterization of Raw and Alkali Treated New Natural Cellulosic Fibres Extracted from the Aerial Roots of Banyan Tree. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 138, 573-581.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102252-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntenga, R., Mfoumou, E., Béakou, A., Tango, M., Kamga, J. and Ahmed, A. (2018) Insight on the Ultrastructure, Physicochemical, Thermal Characteristics and Applications of Palm Kernel Shells. Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 790-811.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2018.910057</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>