<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2020.1080097</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-102143</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Predictive Factors of Successful Treatment of Gestational Diabetes with Metformin Monotherapy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amr</surname><given-names>Mostafa Kamel Aboelfath</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>Taha Abdelfattah Sharaf El din</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Gynecology &amp;amp; Obstetrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1036</fpage><lpage>1044</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: 
  To evaluate the factors affecting the success of metformin in management of GDM. <b>Methods: </b>A prospective cohort study was done for 94 patients diagnosed with GDM from April 2019 to March 2020 who needed pharmacological treatments in addition to diet and lifestyle modification. Cases treated with metformin monotherapy were compared with others who needed insulin in addition to metformin for glycemic control. Patient characteristics, glycemic control data and neonatal outcome were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to find the independent factors affecting the success of metformin.<b> Results: </b>Of 94 patients with GDM who needed pharmacological treatment, 73 (77.6%) used only metformin for treatment of GDM and 21 (22.4%) needed insulin to be added to metformin. Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI was the only significant factor that affects the success of metformin alone in control of GDM (p = 0.03). ROC curve of BMI showed that the cut off value of the highest sensitivity is 32.1 above which metformin monotherapy failed to control GDM. <b>Conclusion:</b> Metformin can be considered as a safe and effective drug for treatment of GDM. Obesity was found as a predictive factor for failure of metformin monotherapy.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gestational Diabetes</kwd><kwd> Metformin</kwd><kwd> Insulin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is diagnosed when a pregnant lady develops hyperglycemia without previous history of diabetes and it is considered as a serious pregnancy complication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref2">2</xref>]. About 3 to 25 percent of pregnancies all over the world are complicated by GDM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref4">4</xref>]. The first step in management is trial to control blood sugar with diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref6">6</xref>]. Diet and physical activity fail to control the condition in about 15% to 60% of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref7">7</xref>]. Insulin was used as the standard treatment of GDM since 1920s. Recently metformin has been considered as an accepted oral alternative for treatment of hyperglycaemia of GDM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref8">8</xref>]. It has the advantage over the use of insulin of being an oral drug with better patient compliance and lower cost [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref9">9</xref>]. Although metformin is as effective as insulin in blood sugar control, in many cases we need to add insulin to metformin for better maternal and fetal outcome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>The aim of our study is to evaluate the factors that affect the success of metformin in management of GDM.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This prospective cohort study was done for patients attending the antenatal care clinic of Zagazig University hospital in Egypt from April 2019 to March 2020. The study was accepted by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine of Zagazig University. Two hundred patients diagnosed with GDM were enrolled in the study. An informed consent was taken about the patient’s participation and acceptance of data collection. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes was based on 100 gm glucose 3 hours GTT (Glucose tolerance test) after fasting for 8 hours. We used Carpenter-Coustan criteria with fasting, 1-hour, 2-hour, and 3-hour plasma glucose levels with lower threshold values of 95 mg/dL, 180 mg/dL, 155 mg/dL, and 140 mg/dL respectively. Diagnosis was established if two values or more were at or above these values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref11">11</xref>]. All Patients offered a two weeks trial to control blood sugar with a balanced diet and 30 minutes of daily exercise. Our target was to keep fasting blood glucose below 95 mg/dl and the two hours post prandial below 140 mg /dl. Patients in whom diet and exercise failed to control GDM were included in the study, with the gestational age between 24 and 32 weeks and 18 - 40 years old. Twin pregnancies, fetal growth restriction, congenital anomalies diagnosed by ultrasonography, other medical disorders (cardiac, hepatic or renal troubles) and patients on drugs that alter blood glucose were excluded from the study. Metformin was given to all patients who met our inclusion and exclusion criteria with a starting dose of 500 mg BD, follow up was done on a three times weekly basis by measuring fasting and 2 hours postprandial blood glucose. The dose of metformin was increased weekly up to 2000 mg daily. Insulin was added if the maximum dose of metformin failed to control blood sugar. Analysis of data was done for two groups: those who respond to metformin alone (Group I) and those who needed insulin supplementation (Group II).</p><p>Maternal data collected were: GA (gestational age), parity, OGTT and BMI at the start of the study, maternal weight gain throughout pregnancy, results of follow up blood sugar and any pregnancy complications. Neonatal outcome measures were: The age of birth, NICU admissions, birth weight and birth trauma.</p><p>Statistical analysis</p><p>Data were collected, tabulated and analyzed. Quantitative continuous data were represented by mean &#177; SD, while categorical data were represented by number (absolute frequency) and percentage (relative frequency). Differences between the metformin only group and the metformin and insulin group were tested by independent t-test when quantitative and by chi-square test or Fisher exact test when categorical. Multivariate analysis was done by cox proportional hazard test. A p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Two hundred pregnant women with GDM were followed up during the study period. One hundred &amp; six patients were not included in the study because their blood glucose was controlled with diet and physical exercises. Ninety four patients met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 73 (77.6%) of them used only metformin for treatment of GDM, and 21 (22.4%) needed insulin to be added to the metformin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The mean and standard deviation of BMI of the all patients was (31.5 &#177; 4.2) and other maternal characteristics were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that there was no significant difference between both groups regarding glycemic control during the whole period of follow up. Also the third trimester HbA1c was not significantly different in both groups.</p><p>All obstetric and neonatal criteria were not significantly different in both groups. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> univariate analysis shows that primiparity and younger age increase the chance of successful treatment with metformin monotherapy, and, therefore, considered as protective factors. On the other hand, obese patients had a higher chance of need for insulin supplementation. The other factors analyzed did not show any significant difference. Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI was the only significant factor that affects the success of metformin alone in control of GDM with cut off value of highest sensitivity (32.1) as shown in the ROC curve, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Patient characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Of the study population</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Continuous data (mean &#177; SD)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5 &#177; 4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GA at diagnosis (weeks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7 &#177; 2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GA at start of treatment (weeks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.5 &#177; 1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OGTT (mg/dL) – Fasting – 1 hour – 2 hours – 3 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.5 &#177; 8.9 210.6 &#177; 15.3 179.6 &#177; 10.7 148 &#177; 6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Categorical data, No (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity – Primigravida – Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (40.4) 56 (59.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension – Pre-gestational – Gestational</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4.2) 7 (7.4)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SD: Standard deviation, BMI: Body mass index, GA: Gestational age, HbA1c: Glycosylated hemoglobin, OGTT: Oral glucose tolerance test.</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Glycemic control</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metformin alone (Group I) n = 73</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metformin + insulin (Group II) n = 21</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal weight gain till delivery (kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean fasting glucose level during first week (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.6 &#177; 2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.498*</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean 2 h post-prandial glucose level during first week (mg/dL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >122.5 &#177; 8.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >123.2 &#177; 10.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.213*</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean fasting glucose level during first 2 weeks (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.2 &#177; 3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.7 &#177; 5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.414*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean 2 h post-prandial glucose level during first 2 weeks (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.5 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.9 &#177; 12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.176*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean fasting glucose level during last week (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.9 &#177; 7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.2 &#177; 8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean 2 h post-prandial glucose level during last week (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.3 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.9 &#177; 10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.184*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean fasting glucose level during last 2 weeks (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.8 &#177; 10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.9 &#177; 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.231*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean 2 h post-prandial glucose level during last 2 week (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.2 &#177; 6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114 &#177; 5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.342*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal hypoglycemia, n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (9.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (14.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd </sup>trimester HbA1c (gr/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54*</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>*: Independent t-test, †: Fisher exact test.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Perinatal outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metformin alone (Group I) n = 73</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metformin + insulin (Group II) n = 21</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Continuous data, (mean &#177; SD)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apgar score at 1 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.114*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apgar score at 5 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.231*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal weight at birth (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3542.3 &#177; 189.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3568.5 &#177; 245.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Categorical data, No (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (57.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (71.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prematurity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal hypoglycemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (12.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (19.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macrosomia (≥4000 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (13.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (38.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal congenital anomalies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (13.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (19.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal ICU admission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (28.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal jaundice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1(4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25<sup>†</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Still birth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07<sup>†</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SD: Standard deviation, ICU: Intensive care unit, *: Independent t-test, **: Chi-square test, †: Fisher exact test.</p><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of the factors associated success of metformin monotherapy</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Metformin only (Group I) n = 73</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Metformin + insulin (Group II) n = 21</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Uni-variate P-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Multivariate analysis</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CI 95%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Continuous data, (Mean &#177; SD)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >29.35 &#177; 2.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >33.73 &#177; 4.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.04*</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.782</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.58 - 1.51</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI at diagnosis (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7 &#177; 3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.4 &#177; 4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 - 0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GA at diagnosis (weeks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.1 &#177; 2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54 - 2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GA at start of treatment (weeks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2 &#177; 1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 - 1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fasting glucose level at diagnosis (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.6 &#177; 8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.2 &#177; 8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12 - 4.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Categorical data, No (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity: (Primigravida/Multigravida) (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31/42 (73.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7/14 (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 - 0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension – Pre-gestational – Gestational</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.1) 6 (8.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (4.7) 1 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76<sup>†</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.785</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 - 0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>SD: Standard deviation, BMI: Body mass index, GA: Gestational age, HbA1c: Glycosylated hemoglobin, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, *: Independent t-test, **: Chi-square test, †: Fisher exact test.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Many recent guidelines recommend the use of metformin for treatment of GDM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref13">13</xref>]. Our primary objective is to detect factors that affect the success of metformin alone in treatment of GDM. In our study Adequate glycemic control was not achieved with metformin in 22.4% of cases. This proportion is nearly similar to Tertti et al. (18%) and Silva et al. (21.2%). However it was lower than showed by Rowan et al. (48.3%) and Moore et al. (34.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref17">17</xref>] that may be attributed to different patient’s criteria.</p><p>Our results revealed that higher BMI is strongly associated with metformin failure according to multivariate analysis (OR = 1.671 and 95% CI = 0.12 - 0.96) (P value = 0.03) and that reconfirm the results of most of researchers as Gante, Ali, Meshel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref20">20</xref>]. To our knowledge, it is the first time to state a cutoff point of BMI above which response to metformin decreased significantly.</p><p>Significant difference in response to metformin alone was observed in patients with younger age (P value = 0.04). Similar to our findings, Gante et al. in his study on 388 patients found that higher age was related to the need for insulin supplementation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref19">19</xref>]. Also we found that primigravid women had a higher chance for successful metformin monotherapy. Similarly Souza et al. found primiparity as a protective factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>Although McGrath and coworker in his study on 98 women reported that early diagnosis of GDM and early introduction of metformin were significant factors for insulin supplementation and that was not observed in our study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>Regarding the obstetric and neonatal outcomes there was no significant difference between both groups and that was reported by most authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref23">23</xref>]. Although we had more cases in the metformin + insulin group delivered by cesarean section (71.4%) but still with no significant value. On the other hand Gante et al. reported that cesarean was significantly more in the combination group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102143-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>Small sample size was one of the limitations of the study. Also, most of our data collected regarding glycemic control was dependent on sheets that were filled by patients.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Metformin can be regarded as a safe and effective drug for treatment of GDM, and about 23% of the patients treated with metformin did not achieve adequate glycemic control. Obesity was found as an independent factor for failure of metformin monotherapy.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Aboelfath, A.M.K. and Sharaf El din, M.T.A. (2020) Predictive Factors of Successful Treatment of Gestational Diabetes with Metformin Monotherapy. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 1036-1044. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1080097</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102143-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plows, J.F., Stanley, J.L., Baker, P.N., Reynolds, C.M. and Vickers, M.H. (2018) The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113342</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melchior, H., Kurch-Bek, D. and Mund, D. (2017) The Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 144, 412-418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, Y. and Zhang, C. (2016) Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Risk of Progression to Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Perspective. Current Diabetes Reports, 16, 7.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crowther, C., Hiller, J., Moss, J., McPhee, A., Jeffries, W. and Robinson, J. (2005) Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 2477-2486.  
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042973</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landon, M.B., Spong, C.Y., Thom, E., et al. (2009) A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1339. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0902430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, J., Alwan, N.A., West, J., et al. (2017) Lifestyle Interventions for the Treatment of Women with Gestational Diabetes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD011970. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011970.pub2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilinskya, A.S., Akirka, A.F., Hughesa, A.R. and Lindsay, R.S. (2015) Lifestyle Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention in Women with Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioural, Anthropometric and Metabolic Outcomes. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2, 448-461.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Susan, G. (2017) The Emerging Role of Metformin in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 19, 765-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12893</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spaulonci, C.P., Bernardes, L.S., Trindade, T.C., Zugaib, M. and Francisco, R.P. (2013) Randomized Trial of Metformin vs Insulin in the Management of Gestational Diabetes. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 209, 34.e1-7.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashoush, S., El-Said, M., Fathi, H. and Abdelnaby, M. (2016) Identification of Metformin Poor Responders, Requiring Supplemental Insulin, during Randomization of Metformin versus Insulin for the Control of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 42, 640-647.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12950</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carpenter, M.W. and Coustan, D.R. (1982) Criteria for Screening Tests for Gestational Diabetes. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 144, 768-773.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and Its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3  
https://doi.org/10.15277/bjdvd.2015.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Norwegian Directorate of Health (2017) National Guideline for Gestational Diabetes. Nasjonal Faglig Retningslinje for Svangerskapsdiabetes.  
https://helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/svangerskapsdiabetes</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rowan, J.A., Hague, W.M., Gao, W., Battin, M.R., Moore, M.P. and MiG Trial Investigators (2008) Metformin versus Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2003-2015.  
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, L.E., Clokey, D., Rappaport, V.J. and Curet, L.B. (2010) Metformin Compared with Glyburide in Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 115, 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c52132</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tertti, K., Ekblad, U., Vahlberg, T. and Ronnemaa, T. (2008) Comparison of Metformin and Insulin in the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective, Case-Control Study. The Review of Diabetic Studies, 5, 95-101.  
https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2008.5.95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, J.C., Fachin, D.R.R.N., Coral, M.L. and Bertini, A.M. (2012) Perinatal Impact of the Use of Metformin and Glyburide for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 40, 225-228.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2011-0175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shelly, E.S., Harel, T., Maslovitz, S., Germez, N., Elimelech, B., Cohen, B., et al. (2016) Can We Predict the Need for Pharmacological Treatment According to Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in Gestational Diabetes? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &amp; Neonatal Medicine, 29, 2062-2066.  
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1077225</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gante, I., Melo, L., Dores, J., Ruas, L. and Almeida, M.D.C. (2018) Metformin in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Predictors of Poor Response. European Journal of Endocrinology, 178, 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0486</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, A., Shastry, S., Nithiyananthan, R., Ali, A. and Ganapathy, R. (2018) Gestational Diabetes-Predictors of Response to Treatment and Obstetric Outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 220, 57-60.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.11.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Souza, M.L., e Silva, R.R., e Silva, T.R., de Oliveira, L.C., Dienstmann, G., do Nascimento, I.B. and Silva, J.C. (2019) Factors Associated with the Need for Insulin as a Complementary Treatment to Metformin in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 41, 697-702.  
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGrath, R.T., Glastras, S.J., Hocking, S. and Fulcher, G.R. (2016) Use of Metformin Earlier in Pregnancy Predicts Supplemental Insulin Therapy in Women with Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 116, 96-99.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102143-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, S., Takkar, N. and Goel, P. (2019) Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Patients of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Metformin Therapy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 69, 490-494.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01216-4</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>