<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2020.87014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-102142</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evolution Characteristics and Stratigraphic Division of Quaternary Sedimentary in the South Wing of Yangtze River Delta, East China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ming</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhongyang</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey, Hangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>235</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    This paper discusses the sporo pollen assemblage, evolution of sedimentary environment, sedimentary facies and the lithotope characteristics revealed by boreholes since pliocene epoch by carrying out 
   <sup>14</sup>C dating, sporo pollen and micro-paleontological analysis of sediments in borehole BK01 (depth 237.80 m) in the southern flank of the Yangtze River Delta Plain. According to the results of this study, there are 17 species of foraminifera that have been identified as 11 genera, including 16 benthic foraminifera and 1 planktonic foraminifera；8 species of Ostracoda that have been identified as 8 genera; sporo pollen analysis shows that there are 37 types, including 18 species of woody plant pollen, 11 species of herbaceous plant pollen, 8 species of fern spores, of which, in the sporo pollen assemblage, woody plants have the highest content (about 85.1%), ferns spores have about 8.7%, and herbaceous plants have only 6.3%. Sedimentary environment records can be divided into 18 sporo pollen assemblage zones according to borehole lithology, sporo pollen assemblage and micropaleontology analysis. The results show that the BK01 bore strata from bottom to top can be divided into carbonaceous mudstone (E
   <em>ch</em>), Jiaxing Formation (N-Qp
   <sub>1</sub>
   <em>j</em>), Qiangang Formation (Qp
   <sub>2</sub>
   <em>q</em>) Dongpu Formation (Qp
   <sub>3</sub>
   <em>d</em>), Ningbo Formation (Qp
   <sub>3</sub>
   <em>n</em>) and Zhenhai Formation (Qh
   <em>zh</em>). 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Quaternary</kwd><kwd> Sporopollen</kwd><kwd> Stratum</kwd><kwd> Sedimentary Environment</kwd><kwd> Yangtze River Delta</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>With the change of global environment increasingly becoming an important issue of concern to the international community, the study of the evolution history of global climate and environment since Pleistocene has attracted much attention of scholars (Huang et al., 2018; Edwards, 2003). The Yangtze River Delta is an alluvial plain before the Yangtze River enters the sea (Su et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2010). Studying the sequence of sedimentary strata in the Yangtze River Delta since Pleistocene is not only of great significance to the study of the development history of sedimentation and the evolution of palaeogeographic environment in the Yangtze River Delta (Wang et al., 2008), but also plays an unique role in studying the formation of alluvial plain and the change of palaeogeographic environment in the Yangtze River Delta in this geographical position on the southern wing of the Yangtze River Delta as a research hotspot in recent years (Fan et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2016).</p><p>At present, it has made a lot of important achievements in the study of the changes of paleoclimate and sea level since the last glacial period in the Hangzhou Bay area (Wang et al., 2008; Li et al., 2011), which not only lays a foundation for the further study of sedimentary characteristics, stratigraphic sequence and paleoenvironment evolution since the Quaternary, especially the Holocene, but also provides a detailed basis for the study of the evolution of the Yangtze River delta plain in the Quaternary (Lin et al., 2019a; Zhang, 2005; Yu et al., 2016; Miao et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2010). However, due to the difficulty of drilling, the depth of boreholes and the limitation of the analysis of borehole sample collection and testing in the previous work, the existing research on the Paleoenvironment of Holocene period is more in-depth (Liu et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2019), while the research on the evolution of sedimentary environment since Pleistocene period in the southern wing of the Yangtze River Delta is relatively few, and there are some bottlenecks such as the lack of high-precision stratigraphic data since Pleistocene.</p><p>Through sampling and analysis of high resolution sporo pollen, foraminifera and ostracods in the sediment cores of borehole BK01, this paper studies the evolution characteristics of sedimentary facies and sedimentary environment in the plain area of the Yangtze River Delta, and carries out lithological stratification and stratigraphic division of boreholes by combining isotope dating data, which not only provides evidence for the division and comparison of Quaternary strata in the Yangtze River Delta, but also provides basic information for the further research.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Borehole BK01 (30˚44'45''N, 120˚53'59''E), located in Daqiao Town, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), is 237.80 m deep, of which the part below 236.50 m is bedrock. This study cuts, flattens and describes the lithology of drilled cores</p><p>from the center along the longitudinal direction, collects 104 samples of micropaleontology (foraminifera, ostracoda) and sporo pollen analysis respectively, 184 samples of grain size analysis, 175 samples of paleomagnetism and 8 samples of photoluminescence dating, with a sampling interval of 1 m.</p><p>Micro paleontological analysis includes identification and quantitative statistics of foraminifera and ostracoda species. The specific analysis method is to dry sediment samples below 60˚C, weigh about 50 g dry samples and add a little 15% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solution, wash the samples with 0.052 mm pore sieve after dispersal, carry out identification and quantitative statistics of genera and species under Nikon E 200 bio-microscopy after flotation and filtration (calculated with 100 g dry samples). The process of sporo pollen analysis is to take 50 g of each sample, extract the sporo pollen flotation material to identify, count and calculate its percentage content under the microscope after acid-alkali treatment and gravity liquid flotation (Zhang, 2005; Tao et al., 2005; Li &amp; Zhao, 2018; Jia &amp; Zhang, 2006).</p><p>Eight samples of sediment containing carbon chips are packaged in sealed packages for photoluminescence dating (OSL), which is carried out by the conventional methods (Nian et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2019), that is, to take out about 100 g of unexposed samples in a 1000 ml beaker and soak them in distilled water; first remove organic matter with 30% hydrogen peroxide, then remove carbonate minerals with 30% hydrochloric acid, and then wash the suspension to neutrality with distilled water, separate 4 - 11 &#181;m fine-grained mixed minerals according to Stokes theorem, then immerse them in fluosilicic acid for 3 days, remove feldspar and other minerals, purify fine-grained quartz, and evenly precipitate the purified fine-grained quartz sample on stainless steel sheet with 9.7 mm diameter by ethanol, complete it using Ris&#248; TL/OSL-DA-20 thermoluminescence/photoluminescence instrument produced by Ris&#248; Laboratory in Denmark.</p><p>The Department of Geosciences, Sun Yat-sen University complete sporo pollen analysis and micropaleontology analysis. The Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences is commissioned to complete sediment dating analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Paleoenvironmental Information</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sporo Pollen Assemblage</title><p>The 104 sporo pollen samples from borehole BK01 are identified as 37 sporo pollen types, including 18 woody pollens, 11 herbaceous pollens and 8 fern spores. Among the sporo pollen assemblages, woody plants have the highest content (about 85.1%), ferns spores have about 8.7%, and herbaceous plants have only 6.3%. The pollen of coniferous plants is mainly Pinus and Taxodiaceae, and contain a small amount of pollen such as Tsuga. The pollen of broad-leaved plants is mainly Liquidambar, and contains a certain amount of Ulmus, Fagus, Juglans, Quercus and Carpinus. The pollen of herbaceous plants is Cyperaceae and Polygonum, followed by Poaceae and Caryophyllaceae, and a small amount of Liliaceae and Plantago. The pollen of pteridophytes is mainly Polypodiaceae, Trilete spore and Polypodium. It can be divided into 18 sporo pollen assemblage zones according to the changes of sporo pollen types and assemblage characteristics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>P1 (235 - 212 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is slightly lower, with an average concentration of 104 grains per gram. The pollen content of pteridophytes is dominant, with an average of 85.5%, among which Polypodiaceae, Trilete spore and Petris are the most abundant; The average pollen content of woody plants is 14.5%, mainly coniferous plants such as Pinus. No herbaceous pollen is found here.</p><p>P2 (212 - 166.5 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, the average concentration is only 9.3 grains per gram. It only find pollen of woody plants, Abies, Mimosa and Penus.</p><p>P3 (164.8 - 160 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, the average concentration is only 58 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 79.5%, among which the pollens of conifers such as Pinus and Quercus are the most abundant; The average pollen content of herbaceous plants is 10.2%, mainly of Poaceae plants, while that of ferns is only 10.2%, mainly of Trilete spore.</p><p>P4 (157 - 137 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is zero.</p><p>P5 (135-131 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average concentration of 69 grains per gram. All of them are fern pollen. Trilete spore, Polypodiaceae and Cibotium are the most abundant, followed by Pteris.</p><p>P6 (129 - 105 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is zero.</p><p>P7 (103 - 99 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is high, with the average concentration of 16,445 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants account for the absolute predominance, with an average of 92.9%, of which Pinus and other coniferous plants are the main pollen, followed by Liquidambar and Ulmus; The average pollen content of pteridophytes is 5.7%, mainly Polypodiaceae, while that of herbaceous plants is 1.4%, mainly Polygonum.</p><p>P8 (97 - 93 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average of 102 grains per gram. The average pollen content of woody plants is 65.5%, mainly Liquidambar, followed by Pinus; the average pollen content of ferns is 34.5%, mainly Polypodiaceae, followed by Trilete spores; the pollen content of grass plants is zero.</p><p>P9 (91 - 80 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is high, with an average concentration of 2776 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 85.8%, among which Pinus and Abies are the most abundant, followed by Liquidambar, etc. The average pollen content of ferns is 12.8%, mainly Polypodiaceae, and the average pollen content of herbaceous plants is 1.4%, mainly Artemisia.</p><p>P10 (78 - 75 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average concentration of 169 grains per gram. The average pollen content of woody plants is 87.6%, among which Pinus is the most abundant, followed by Liquidambar Formosana; The average pollen content of pteridophytes is 7.0%, mainly Trilete spore, while that of herbaceous plants is 1.1%, mainly Polygonum.</p><p>P11 (73 - 69 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is higher, with an average concentration of 1039 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 94.9%, among which Pinus is the most abundant, followed by Beech, Tsuga, Liquidambar, etc. The average pollen content of pteridophytes is 5.1%, mainly Trilete spore, while that of herbaceous plants is zero.</p><p>P12 (66 - 62 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average concentration of 297 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 74.6%, of which Pinus, Hemlock spruce and other coniferous pollen are the main pollen, followed by Beech, Liquidambar, etc. The average pollen content of ferns is 23.2%, mainly Trilete spore, while that of herbaceous plants is 2.2%, mainly Cyperaceae.</p><p>P13 (60 - 58 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is high, with an average concentration of 2847 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 79.1%, of which Pinus and Fir are the main coniferous pollen, followed by Beech and Quercus. The average pollen content of pteridophytes is 12.9%, mainly Trilete spore, and that of herbaceous plants is 7.9%, mainly Cyperaceae.</p><p>P14 (57 - 42 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low.</p><p>P15 (38.4 - 35 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen increased slightly, with an average concentration of 190 grains per gram. The pollen content of woody plants accounted for the absolute dominance, with an average content of 73.7%, of which Pinus is the most abundant, followed by Magnolia, etc. The average pollen content of pteridophytes is 17.6%, mainly Polypodiaceae, while that of herbaceous plants is 6.5%, mainly Poaceae.</p><p>P16 (32 - 21 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average concentration of 37 grains per gram. The pollen content of pteridophytes is absolutely dominant, with an average of 91%, of which Polypodiaceae is the most abundant, followed by Trilete spore, etc. The average pollen content of woody plants is 9%, mainly Magnolia, while that of herbaceous plants is almost zero.</p><p>P17 (20 - 14 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is high with an average concentration of 3247 grains per gram. The average pollen content of woody plants is 74.2%, Juglans and Pinus are the most abundant, followed by Ulmus, Tsuga, Taxodiaceae and Quercus. The average pollen content of herbaceous plants is 15.2%, mainly Cyperaceae, followed by Polygonum and Ranunculus, while that of ferns is 10.6%, mainly Polypodiaceae.</p><p>P18 (12.6 - 3.5 m): The total concentration of sporo pollen is low, with an average concentration of 109 grains per gram. The pollen content of ferns is absolutely dominant, with an average content of 68.1%, among which Trilete spore and Polypodiaceae are the most abundant, followed by Lygodium, Pteris and Cibotium; The average pollen content of woody plants is 27.5%, mainly Pinus, while that of herbaceous plants is 4.3%, mainly Liliaceae.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Micropaleontology</title><p>There are 104 foraminifera samples in borehole BK01, of which 11 genera and 17 species are identified, including 16 benthic foraminifera and one planktonic foraminifera. Each 100 g sediment contains 0 - 497,489 foraminiferal shells. There are 104 ostracoda samples in borehole BK01, of which 8 genera and 8 species of ostracoda are identified. Each 100 g sediment contains 0 - 125,569 ostracodal shells. The total abundance and species depth distribution of foraminifera and ostracoda are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Some foraminifera and ostracoda maps are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Total abundance and species distribution of foraminifera and Ostracoda in BK01</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Foraminifera</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >ostracoda</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stratified position</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number (/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Main species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stratified position</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number (/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Main species</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82 - 75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1876 - 497,489</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonia, Cribrononion and Elphidium</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >O1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7483</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sinocytheridea impressa and Neosinocythere elongate, Sinocytheridea impressa, Sinocythere sinensis and Stigmatocythere bona</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 - 57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384 - 109,354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonia beccar II and Cribrononion subincertum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 58,321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonia beccar II and Cribrononion subincertum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sinocytheridea impressa, Neomonoceratina dongtaiensis, Loxoconcha ocellata</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonia and Elphidium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1890</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sinocytheridea impressa, Loxoconcha ocellata, Bicorncythere leizhouensisa</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Chronological Sequence</title><p>The data of relevant ages measured by OSL method are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The OSL ages at 24.0 m, 29.0 m and 59.0 m are 60.5 &#177; 3.3 ka, 74.8 &#177; 3.8 ka and 120.6 &#177; 8.9 ka, respectively. And the strata at that time belong to the Middle Pleistocene. In addition, OSL ages at hole depths of 108.5 m, 129.0 m and 138.2 m are all over 150 ka.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Division of Quaternary Strata</title><p>The lithological stratification and stratigraphic division of borehole BK01 are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Based on the lithological stratification characteristics and the division of stratigraphic units in the study area (Qi et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2019b), the borehole are Ech (Ech, 236.5 - 237.8 m), and N-Qp<sub>1</sub>j, Qp<sub>2</sub>q, Qp<sub>3</sub>d, Qp<sub>3</sub>n, and Qhzh since early Pleistocene from bottom to top.</p><p>N-Qp<sub>1</sub>j: its hole depth is exposed from 147.0 to 236.5 m. Among them, 147.0 - 148.3 m is the al-lN-Qp<sub>1</sub>j<sub>3</sub>, with a thickness of 1.3 m, dominated by sub-clay and high content of iron and manganese; 148.3 - 205.4 m is the al(p<sub>l</sub>) N-Qp<sub>1</sub>j<sub>3</sub>, with a thickness of 57.1 m, and the lithology mainly occurs alternately in medium sand, silt and sub-clay, medium coarse sand and gravel sand. 205.4 - 236.5 m is the al(pl)N-Qp<sub>1</sub>j<sub>2</sub>, with a thickness of 31.1 m, and the lithology is dominated by fine sand and gravel.</p><p>Qp<sub>2</sub>q: whose hole depth is exposed from 84.0 m to 147.0 m, is marked by hard soil, which is divided into two sections with a thickness of 63.0 M. 84.0 - 106.3 m is the Qp<sub>2</sub>q<sub>2</sub> of alluvial lake, marsh and alluvial origin, with a thickness of 22.3 m, mainly clayey soil and sub-sandy soil. 106.3 - 147.0 m is the Qp<sub>2</sub>q<sub>1</sub>, which is formed by alluvial lake and marsh deposits, with a thickness of 40.7 m; 106.3 - 132.4 m is the clayey soil layer with more iron and manganese oxides and more fine silt particles in part; 132.4 - 137.8 m is the clayey soil and sub-sandy soil with developed bedding and partly contains semi-carbonated plant residues;</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> OSL dating results of BK01</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >De (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DoesRate (Gy/ka)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (ka)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.5 &#177; 3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.8 &#177; 3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >314.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.6 &#177; 8.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.7 &#177; 9.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK01-R10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;150</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>137.8 - 147.0 m is a sub-clay and medium sand layer with slightly bedding and contains more ferromanganese oxides.</p><p>Qp<sub>3</sub>d: whose hole depth is exposed from 58.5 to 84.0 m, is marked by hard soil layer with a thickness of 25.5 m. 58.5 - 62.5 m is Qp<sub>3</sub>d of alluvial-lacustrine origin, with a thickness of 4.0 m, mainly the clayey soil. The grains in the lower part are coarser and contain more ferromanganese oxides and calcareous argillaceous nodules. 62.5 - 84.0 m is the Qp<sub>3</sub>d of alluvial-marine origin, with a thickness of 21.5 m, which is mainly composed of silt layer with thin sub-sandy soil.</p><p>Qp<sub>3</sub>n: whose hole depth is exposed from 19.6 to 58.5 m, is marked by hard soil. The main sediments are clayey soil, clayey soil with sub-sandy soil and sub-sandy soil of alluvial lake, marine and alluvial sub-clay, with a thickness of 38.9 m. 19.6 - 43.1 m is the Qp<sub>3</sub>n<sub>2</sub> of alluvial-lacustrine, alluvial-marine and marine origin, with a thickness of 23.5 m, mainly clayey soil, sub-sandy soil with silt layer, iron-manganese oxide and calcareous nodules. 43.1 - 58.5 m is the Qp<sub>3</sub>n<sub>1</sub> of alluvial and marine origin, with a thickness of 15.4 m, mainly composed of clayey soil, clayey soil with sub-sandy soil. 43.1 - 51.4 m is the alluvial lake origin, which contains more ferromanganese oxides and shows slightly stratification locally. 51.4 - 58.5 m is mainly the sub-sandy soil and the clayey soil with alluvial and thin layers of marine sediments, partially silt, wormholes and more shell fragments can be seen in the marine layer.</p><p>Qhzh: whose hole depth is exposed from 0 to 19.6 m. 0 - 3.6 m is the Qhzh<sub>2</sub>, which is mainly composed of clayey soil layer of miscellaneous fill and alluvial Lake origin, with a thickness of 3.6 m. 3.6 - 19.6 m is the Qhzh<sub>1</sub>, its lower part is silty clay. 3.6 - 8.5 m is the Qhzh<sub>1</sub> of alluvial-lacustrine origin, with a thickness of 4.9 m and mainly clayey soil. 8.5 - 14.0 m is alluvial-marine origin, with a thickness of 5.5 m, mainly composed of clayey soil with silty clay. 14.0 - 19.6 m is marine origin, with a thickness of 5.6 m and mainly silty loam.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>1) In this borehole, the ages of the photoluminescence strata at depths of 24.0 m, 29.0 m and 59.0 m are 60.5 &#177; 3.3 ka, 74.8 &#177; 3.8 ka and 120.6 &#177; 8.9 ka, respectively, with the strata age of the Late Pleistocene; The age of photoluminescence strata at depths of 90.2 m is 142.7 &#177; 9.6 ka, while that in the depths of 108.5 m, 129.0 m and 138.2 m is more than 150 ka.</p><p>2) The record of sedimentary environment of borehole BK01 can be divided into 18 sporo pollen zones. The early Pleistocene corresponds to the sporo pollen P1 - P3 zones and the early P4 zone. The middle Pleistocene corresponds to the late stage of the sporo pollen P4 zone and the P5 - P9 zones. The late Pleistocene corresponds to the sporo pollen P10 - P16 zones. The Holocene is the tidal flat facies deposited in the Qhzh<sub>1</sub> in the early stage and the fluvial and lacustrine facies deposited in the Qhzh<sub>1</sub> in the late stage.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was funded by Project of China Geological Survey (1212011220008, 1212011220538). The anonymous reviewers, Dr. Maosong Ye and Xudong Zhao provided valuable suggestions and comments on the manuscript, which is greatly appreciated.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wu, M., &amp; Lin, Z. Y. (2020). Evolution Characteristics and Stratigraphic Division of Quaternary Sedimentary in the South Wing of Yangtze River Delta, East China. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 8, 235- 245. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.87014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102142-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J., Li, X., Wang, Z., &amp; Chen, Z. (2009). Paleoclimate and Sea Level Fluctuations in Shanghai Region: Sporo-Pollen Implications during the Past 120000 Years. Marine Sciences, 32, 68-73. (in Chinese with English Abstract).  
http://qdhys.ijournal.cn/hykx/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20090214&amp;flag=1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Q., Li, C., Li, P., Liu, B., &amp; Sun, H. (2008). Late Quaternary Palaeosols in the Yangtze Delta, China, and Their Palaeoenvironmental Implications. Geomorphology, 100, 465-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names> G. N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>. Ichnotaxonomy, Origin, and Paleoenvironment of Quaternary Insect Cells from Fuerteventura, Canary Islands, Spain</article-title><source> Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society</source><volume> 76</volume>,<fpage> 320</fpage>-<lpage>327</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, D., Qi, H., Sun, X., Liu, Y., &amp; Yang, Z. (2011). Annual Lamination and Its Sedimentary Implications in the Yangtze River Delta Inferred from High-Resolution Biogenic Silica and Sensitive Grain-Size Records. Continental Shelf Research, 31, 129-137.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2010.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, L., Long, H., Zhang, P., Tamura, T., Feng, W., &amp; Mei, Q. (2019). The Sedimentary Evolution of Yangtze River Delta since MIS3: A New Chronology Evidence Revealed by OSL Dating. Quaternary Geochronology, 49, 153-158.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.03.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, X., Liang, K., Xia, Z., Zhang, S., Lin, J., Ma, S., &amp; Huo, Z. (2018). The Sedimentary Characteristics of Upper Pleistocene and Its Palaeo-Environmental Records in Northern Beibu Gulf . Quaternary Sciences, 38, 454-471. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jia, L., &amp; Zhang, Y. (2006). Studies on Palynological Assemblages and Paleoenvironment of Late Quaternary in the East Margin of the Changjiang (Yangtze) River Delta. Acta Micropalae-ontologica Sinica, 23, 70-76. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, B., Wei, Z., Li, X., He, Z., Zhang, K., &amp; Wang, Z. (2011). Records from Quaternary Sediment and Palaeo-Environment in the Yangtze River Delta. Quaternary Sciences, 31, 316-328. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Q., &amp; Zhao, Y. (2018). Quantitative Methods and Progress of Paleo-Floristic Diversity Reconstruction Based on Pollen Assemblages. Quaternary Sciences, 38, 821-829. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names> Z.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Jin</surname><given-names> X.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Guan</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Pan</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Zhao</surname><given-names> X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2019a</year>)<article-title>. Stratigraphic Division and Paleoenvironment Evolution in the Southern Yangtze River Delta Plain since the Pliocene</article-title><source> Earth and Environment</source><volume> 47</volume>,<fpage> 464</fpage>-<lpage>476</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, Z., Jin, X., Guan, M., Zhao, X., Pan, S., &amp; Long, Z. (2019b). Quaternary Sedimentary Sequence of the Southern Yangtze River Delta and Its Coupling with Paleoenvironmental Evolution. Science Technology and Engineering, 19, 15-24.  
http://www.stae.com.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=1810631&amp;flag=1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, J., Saito, Y., Kong, X., Wang, H., Xiang, L., Wen, C., &amp; Nakashima, R. (2010). Sedimentary Record of Environmental Evolution off the Yangtze River Estuary, East China Sea, during the Last ~13,000 Years, with Special Reference to the Influence of the Yellow River on the Yangtze River Delta during the Last 600 Years. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 2424-2438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, J., Zhao, S., Cheng, J., Bao, J., &amp; Yin, G. (2007). A Study of Vegetation and Climate Evolution since the Holocene near the Banks of the Qiangtang River in Hangzhou Bay. Earth Science Frontiers, 14, 235-245. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y., Deng, B., Du, J., Zhang, G., &amp; Hou, L. (2019). Nutrient Burial and Environmental Changes in the Yangtze Delta in Response to Recent River Basin Human Activities. En- vironmental Pollution, 249, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miao, W., Li, S., Fen, J., Gao, L., &amp; Jian, E. (2016). Stratigraphic Division of NB5 Core in the Yangtze Delta Area and Its Environmental Change Information. Geology in China, 6, 2022-2035. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nian, X., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Sun, Q., Chen, J., Chen, Z., &amp; Hutchinson, S. M. (2018). The Chronology of a Sediment Core from Incised Valley of the Yangtze River Delta: Comparative OSL and AMS 14 C Dating. Marine Geology, 395, 320-330.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2017.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qi, L., Qiao, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Peng, S., He, Z., Yang, S., Han, C., &amp; Zhang, X. (2017). Intensification of the East Asian Monsoon in Southern China at about 300-400 kaBP Inferred from Eolian Deposits in the Middle-Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 91, 1095-1108.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Su, J., Fan, D., Leng, W., Chen, L., &amp; Yin, P. (2017). Postglacial Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Environment Evolution of the Yangtze River Subaqueous Delta. Journal of Palaeogeography, 19, 541-556. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tao, J., Chen, M., &amp; Xu, S. (2005). A Holocene Environmental Record from the Southern Yangtze River Delta, Eastern China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 230, 204-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z., Zhang, D., Li, X., Tao, S., &amp; Xie, Y. (2008). Magnetic Properties and Relevant Minerals of Late Cenozoic Sediments in the Yangtze River Delta and Their Implications. Geology in China, 35, 670-682. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, J., Lao, J., Jiang, R., Zeng, J., Peng, B., Ma, X., Zhao, L., &amp; Yang, Z. (2016). Reconstruction of the Late Quaternary Palaeoenvironment on the North Wing of Yangtze River Delta, Based on Comparative Study of the Multistratigraphies. Geological Bulletin of China, 35, 1692-1704. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y. (2005). Studies on Sporo-Pollen and Environment of Late Quaternary on the Front Edge of Changjiang River Delta. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 27, 82-87. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102142-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Li, L., Zhan, Q., &amp; Chen, T. (2015). Grain Size Distribution of Modern Tidal Flat Sediments at the Yangtze River Mouth and Its Application to Identification of Sedimentary Facies. Journal of Palaeogeography, 17, 405-416. (in Chinese with English Abstract).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>