<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2020.108037</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-102011</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Beneficiation of White Kaolinitic Sandstone to Produce Kaolin Concentrate from Wadi Siq-Rakyia Area in Wadi Araba, Jordan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jamal</surname><given-names>M. Alali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>829</fpage><lpage>850</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Kaolinitic sandstone samples of Lower Cretaceous from Wadi Siq-Rakyia area in Wadi Araba/south of Jordan were studied and assessed as a source of Kaolin. Three channel samples and a composite bulk sample were studied for their mineralogical, geochemical, and grain size distribution analysis. The aim of this research work was to achieve kaolin concentration by examining the best-suited and cost-effective processing method(s) with appropriate product recovery. Following the initial sample characterisation at “bench scale”, a pilot study was performed on the bulk sandstone sample. Kaolin was accumulated in the fine size fraction (
  &amp;minus;125 μm) after agitating and wet screening of the sample. The 
  &amp;minus;125 μm size fraction sample was used to produce kaolin concentrate. Hydrocyclone classification was applied in the pilot study for this purpose. The mass flowrate of the feeds and the products in the hydrocyclones was calculated for the bulk sample as well as the amount of water required operating the process. A kaolin-enriched product was produced following the use of hydrocyclones. A kaolin concentrate at a grade of 71% and a recovery of 78% was produced which could be used in the ceramic industry for tableware and sanitaryware.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Kaolin Concentrate</kwd><kwd> Hydrocyclones</kwd><kwd> Mass Flowrate</kwd><kwd> Grade and Recovery</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Kaolin is a natural white soft earthly material of very fine-grained platy clay mineral. The term “kaolin” is applied to a product principally composed of kaolinite mineral, a white hydrated aluminium silicate clay mineral. The structure of kaolinite is composed of a silicate tetrahedral sheet (Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) linked to an alumina octahedral sheet [Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub>] to form a single layer which has a general chemical formula Al<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub>.</p><p>Kaolin is extracted from kaolinitic sands, where kaolin content less than 20% and the accompanying sand can be used for construction or industrial uses. Kaolinitic sands containing kaolin may be formed by in-situ alteration of feldspar in Arkosic sands by percolating ground water.</p><p>This study was conducted during my PhD research work at the University of Nottingham in UK and then it is modified and updated to be presented as a paper. The aim of this research work was to evaluate the quality and quantity of the kaolin in the sandstone samples and to assess its possible industrial applications.</p><p>The research study was intended to characterize, evaluate, and to beneficiate the raw material of the kaolinitic sandstone. The study consists of characterization of the raw materials which define the mineralogical, physical and chemical properties, upgrading of the mineral to achieve quality and recovery, and then applying pilot study in order to design and model effective processing method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Data and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Geology, Location and Description of Samples</title><p>The kaolinitic sandstone (KS) samples in Wadi Siq-Rakiya area are from the white sandstone outcrops of the lower part of the Kurnub Sandstone Group of Lower Cretaceous. These outcrops are low relief and isolated hills of white sandstone crop out south of the Gharandal area (65 km north of Aqaba city) within and along the eastern mountainous ridges of Wadi Araba Graben.</p><p>Lithology of the kaolinitic sandstone outcrops are very fine, fine to medium-grained, angular, sub-angular to sub-rounded grains, friable, soft and partly reworked massive white sandstone containing scattered quartz pebbles and granules with white clay matrix. This lithology may result from crushing and subsequent weathering in a strongly deformed zone. The depositional environment of the lower part is interpreted as braided to meandering river channels (indicated by the presence of the channel-fill sandstone) with brief marine intrusions over the alluvial plain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Three kaolinitic sandstone samples were taken from trenches excavated in the outcrops representing a thickness of 15 - 20 m. The sandstone samples are actually friable, poorly cemented sandstone with kaolinite clay mineral as matrix. Kaolinitic clays (thin seams) are interbedded within the sandstone beds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). A composite bulk sample for pilot study was collected from the same location. All samples were bagged, transported to Aqaba port, and shipped to the laboratory of the School at the University of Nottingham in UK.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation</title><p>The studied samples are friable sand with small sandstone lumps, which are easily breakable with little energy. There was no need for any crushing to reduce the size of the particles. Riffling, coning and quartering were carried out at the dry state. Different sizes of riffles were used to reduce the amount of the sample to different representative volume of sub-samples.</p><p>A detailed laboratory work was conducted to study the grain size analysis, the mineralogical variation and contents, the chemical components of the raw samples, and the dry and the wet sieved fractions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The results of this stage will be used as a foundation for the next evaluation and processing steps. Kaolinitic sandstone (KS3) sample was chosen to carry out the detailed characterisation study due to the fact that this sample represents the whole sequence of the deposit as well as the bulk sample.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Description of the study samples from the kaolinitic sandstone (KS) outcrops</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness (m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandstone (Sst.), kaolinite matrix, poorly cemented, friable, fn. to very fn. grained, slightly beige to whitish, quartz (Qz) pebbles.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sst., friable to compact, fine grained, slightly creamy to whitish, kaolinite matrix, thin creamy kaolinite bands, Qz coarse. grainsand pebbles.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sst., kaolinite matrix, friable, fn. to very fn. grained, slightly beige to whitish, Qzcoarse grains and pebbles.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Particle Size Analysis</title><p>Different methods of size analysis were employed in different stages of the study. Sieving technique was extensively used in this stage. In addition, other techniques, such as sedimentation and laser-sizer were also used in other stages.</p><p>Dry and wet sieve analyses were performed on the kaolinitic sandstone sample. The particle size distribution was determined using a set of sieves of aperture sizes of 1180, 850, 600, 425, 300, 212, 150, 106, 75, 53, and 38 μm. The weight retained on each sieve of dry and wet sieving was measured and the weight percentage was calculated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref2">2</xref>]. The results of the weight percentage retained on each sieve are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The results of the kaolinitic sandstone sample are presented in cumulative and frequency distribution curves. For the purpose of plotting, the points on the cumulative and frequency curves are plotted in between two successive sieve sizes.</p><p>The cumulative undersize of the dry and the wet sieving of (KS3) sample shows that the median size (d<sub>50</sub>) of the sample is about 190 μm, which indicates that the kaolinitic sandstone sample is mainly fine-grained size. The results indicate that the sand is poorly sorted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The frequency distribution curves of the dry and the wet sieving of the KS3 sample show that the weight retained on sieve 212 μm has slightly increased from about (16.8%) in the dry sieving to about (18.6%) in the wet sieving. This increase could be explained due to the washing of the clay material from the surface of the grains that has dislodged the lumps and liberated the particles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The percentage of the weight retained on each sieve of the wet and dry sieving analyses of the kaolinitic sandstone (KS3) sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nominal aperture size (&#181;m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Kaolinitic Sandstone (KS3)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry wt%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet wt%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>It is noticed from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> of the KS3sample that the weight retained on the 38 μm sieve was decreased from 6.4% in the dry sieving to 3.1% in the wet sieving. This indicates that water has washed down the fine materials and the clay size particles to the −38 &#181;m fraction.</p><p>The fine particles in the −38 μm wet sieve fraction constitute about 9.1% in weight of the whole rock. The fine material was analysed to determine the particle size distribution using “Mastersizer S” laser technique. The results have shown that 65% is less than 15 &#181;m and 33% is less than 5 &#181;m of this fraction, which stands for 6% and 3% of the whole sample respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Mineralogical Study</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Examination</title><p>The whole rock and the −38 &#181;m dry sievedsize fraction of the (KS3) sample were examined to identify the mineralogical constitutions using the (XRD) technique and employing copper tube radiation (Cu Kα radiation). The identification XRD study of the (KS3) sample indicated that quartz mineral (Q) was the major constituent of the bulk sample and Kaolinite-1A clay mineral (K) was found as minor to trace in the whole rock sample (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The XRD diffractograph of the −38 &#181;m fraction shows that the kaolinite shares quartz as major mineral constituent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>The −2 &#181;m size fraction was produced from the −38 &#181;m fraction by sedimentation method in order to examine other clay minerals. Kaolinite was the only clay mineral detected in the oriented mount of the −2 &#181;m and even in the (−0.2 &#181;m) size fractions. The result was confirmed by examining the glycolated and</p><p>the heated (600˚C) mounts by the XRD. The XRD graph of the Ethylene glycolated mount does not reveal any expandable clay (i.e. smectite clay minerals) in the range of 4˚ - 6˚ 2θ. On the other hand, the XRD graph of the heated mount clearly exhibits the dehydroxilation (i.e. removal of the structure water) of the kaolinite mineral at temperature of 600˚C. This has confirmed the presence of kaolinite as the only clay mineral (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)</title><p>The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) technique was used to visualise the shape, size and morphology of the particle’s surface. It was also used to identify the mineral components of the clay size fraction.</p><p>The kaolinite mineral plates were found in stacks on the surface or cementing the quartz grains. The SEM photograph of the kaolinite plates shows coarse to very fine euhedral to subhedral plates and well crystalline shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Geochemical Study</title><p>The chemical analysis for the major standard elements was carried out using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry and the fusion bead moulding technique was employed for preparation test samples. The results of the chemical analysis of the whole rock samples are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, while the wet and the dry sieved fractions of the (KS3) sample are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experiments and Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Preparation</title><p>The results of mineralogical, chemical and grain size analysis of the −38 and −2 &#181;m size fractions of the kaolinitic sandstone (KS3) confirmed that kaolinite was the only clay mineral found in the sample. The cumulative undersize curve showed that the fine fraction (−125 &#181;m) contained about 34% by weight of the KS3 sample and the percentage of kaolinite increased towards the finer size fractions. Therefore, it was necessary to study this fraction in detail with a view to recovering kaolin.</p><p>The wet screened −125 &#181;m fraction of the bulk sample was subjected to classification trials using hydrocyclone classifiers. The use of hydrocyclones was to produce fine size fraction in order to concentrate kaolin as a product. A sedimentation method was also applied to concentrate kaolin in the −5 &#181;m size fraction. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> illustrates the procedures of kaolin concentration from the −125 &#181;m fraction.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Hydrocyclone Classification</title><p>Hydrocyclone is a continuously operating classifying device, which utilises centrifugal force to accelerate the settling rate of the particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Two types of Mozley hydrocyclones were used. A 2-inch (50.8 mm) diameter hydrocyclone was employed to produce an overflow of “expected” −15 &#181;m size fraction and another 10 mm diameter one used to produce an overflow of approximately −5 &#181;m in size.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The chemical results of the kaolinitic sandstone samples from the studied area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KS3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.87</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The chemical analysis of the whole rock, the dry and the wet sieved size fractions of the (KS3) sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sample No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Rock sample</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+1180 (&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.53</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A substantial amount of the bulk sample was wet screened using a Russell Finex screen in order to produce a suitable quantity of −125 &#181;m material as a feed for the hydrocyclone. The −125 &#181;m fraction was agitated and diluted to obtain a concentration of about 5% - 6% solid by weight. The slurry, of pulp density 1039 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, was fed at 50 psi into the 2-inch hydrocyclone of 6.4 mm spigot and 14 mm vortex finder. This setting was expected to produce an overflow product of approximately −15 &#181;m in size. A 20 second sample was collected from the overflow and the underflow. The wet and dried samples were weighed and the percentage of solids by weight, yield and the mass flowrate in kg/h were calculated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>The results showed that the mass flowrate of dry solids in the 2-inch hydrocyclone was 205.2 kg/hr for the feed and 63 kg/hr for the overflow. The yield or recovery of solids to the overflow was 30.7% and in the underflow was 69.3%, while the weight of water recovered was about 78% and 22% for the overflow and underflow respectively.</p><p>The overflow product from the 2-inch unit was used as feed for the 10 mm hydrocyclone. The feed was adjusted to a solid concentration of 4% - 5% by weight and fed at a pressure of 100 psi using a 2 mm vortex finder and 1 mm spigot. It was stated that using the smallest vortex finder, highest inlet pressure and low feed pulp density produce the finest cut point (d<sub>50</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>A 20-second sample was collected from the overflow and underflow streams. The wet and dried samples were weighed and the percentage solids by weight, yield and the mass flowrate in kg/h were calculated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>The results obtained from operating the 10 mm hydrocyclone showed that the mass flowrate of the dry solids was 7.02 kg/hr for the feed, 1.98 kg/hr for the overflow and 5.04 kg/hr for the underflow. The yield or recovery of the solids to the overflow was 28.2% and 71.8% to the underflow, while the weight of water recovered was about 76% and 24% for the overflow and underflow respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Sedimentation Fractionation</title><p>In another attempt to try to concentrate the kaolin in finer fraction, the overflow from the 2-inch hydrocyclone was used to produce a concentrate of −5 &#181;m in size using the conventional sedimentation technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>The results of the chemical analysis showed that the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content of the −5 and 5 - 15 &#181;m size fractions was 29.48% and 28.22% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). The very close values would reflect poor refining as the quantity of kaolin in these fractions would be in direct proportion to the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content. The results revealed that concentrating kaolin by refining method would not produce a high kaolin concentration in the fine fraction. This was probably due to the wide range of the particle size distribution present in the sample (from less than 1 &#181;m</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The mass balance calculation of the separated products using the 2-inch hydrocyclone</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weight (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mass flowrate (kg/h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >% solids (by wt)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yield (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (%wt)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2599.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3439.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>O/F: Overflow; U/F: Underflow.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The mass balance calculation of the separated products using the 10 mm hydrocyclone</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weight (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mass flowrate (kg/h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >% solids (by wt)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yield (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (%wt)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>O/F: Overflow; U/F: Underflow.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical results of the −5 and 15 - 5 &#181;m size fractions using sedimentation refining method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 15 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.74</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>to around 15 &#181;m), many kaolin particles occur as stacks, and the lack of good dispersion of the suspension. Therefore, there was a need for a shear force such as that encountered in the hydrocyclone to disperse the particles giving a greater chance for size separation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Analytical Results of the Products</title><p>The wet screened −125 &#181;m size fraction and the overflow products from the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones were examined to determine the chemical, mineralogical and particle size analysis using XRF, XRD and Laser sizing techniques.</p><p>The particle size distribution of the wet screened −125 &#181;m fraction and the overflow products of the 2-inch and 10mm hydrocyclones were analysed using Mastersizer-S Laser technique (Malvern). The results showed that classification had occurred using the hydrocyclones and the median (d<sub>50</sub>) decreased from 28 &#181;m for the −125 &#181;m fraction to 6.4 &#181;m and 3 &#181;m for the overflows from the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p><p>The results of the chemical analysis of the hydrocyclones products and the wet screened −125 &#181;m fractions are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. The results indicate that the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content increased from 8.43% in the wet screened to 27.89% and then to 32.58% in the overflows of the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones respectively.</p><p>Also the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content (27.23%) of the underflow of the 10 mm hydrocyclone was still relatively high compared to the overflow (32.58%). This indicated that although separation had taken place based on the particle size, kaolin particles were still reporting with water to the underflow.</p><p>The same hydrocyclone products and the −125 &#181;m fraction were analysed as well by private company [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref6">6</xref>] to confirm and double check by another part. The displayed results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> are in good agreement with those in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> The results of chemical analysis of wet screened and the hydrocyclone products</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wet screen</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2-inch Hydrocyclone</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10 mm Hydrocyclone</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−125 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.58</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> The results of wet screened and the hydrocyclone products analysed by WBB Company</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wet screen</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2-inch Hydrocyclone</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10 mm Hydrocyclone</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−125 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NA: not available.</p><p>The results of the trace element analysis showed low values. Slightly high values of strontium (Sr) and sulphur (S) were noticed in the overflow products, which probably indicated the presence of Celestine (SrSO<sub>4</sub>) heavy mineral as a source of strontium (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0).</p><p>The mineralogical investigation using XRD showed that quartz and kaolinite were the only minerals found in the wet screened fraction and the hydrocyclone products. The mineralogy of the overflow of the 10 mm hydrocyclone showed that although kaolinite was the major constituent, quartz still existed as a minor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). It is indicated that very fine quartz particles (less than 5 &#181;m) were recovered with kaolin in the overflow product.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Kaolin Grade and Recovery</title><p>As quartz was the only impurity provided that any heavy minerals present did not influence the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content, then the only source of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> would be kaolinite. The kaolin content of the products was therefore measured based on the chemical assay of the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Ideally, the weight percentages of the kaolinite constituents are; SiO<sub>2</sub>: 46.55%, H<sub>2</sub>O: 13.96%, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>: 39.49% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref7">7</xref>]. A product of</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Trace element results of the wet screened −125 &#181;m and the overflow of the two hydrocyclones</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Element (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet (−125 &#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >729</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (2-inch)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1704</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (10 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3596</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1916</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>100% kaolin content would contain 39.49% by weight of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and therefore, the kaolin quantity in the products was calculated in proportional to the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> content as a ratio of (100:39.49).</p><p>Based on the results of the 20-second time samples from the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>), the kaolin grade and recovery results were calculated and are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1. It was found that the 2-inch hydrocyclone recovered to the overflow 78% kaolin at a grade of 71% from the −125 &#181;m fraction. The 2-inch overflow was fed to the 10 mm hydrocyclone and recovered 32% at a grade of 82.5% to the overflow stream.</p><p>It should be mentioned that there was still a considerable amount (68% recovery at a grade of 69%) of kaolin in the underflow product of the 10 mm hydrocyclone. Returning this underflow to the feed would probably increase the recovery of kaolin to the overflow. However, this was not part of the current work.</p><p>Based on the results of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1, the dry weight and recovery of the overflow products for the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones were calculated based on the dry weight of the wet screened −125 &#181;m fraction. The results are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2.</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Grade and recovery of kaolin in the products of the 2-inch and 10mm hydrocyclones</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dry Weight</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Kaolin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade/content (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (2-inch)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F (2-inch)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (10 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F (10 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Grade and recovery of kaolin in the overflow products of the bulk sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dry Wt (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Kaolin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wet sieved (−125 &#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (2-inch)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F (10 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reconstituted Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The results showed that the kaolin grade (content) increased from 21% by weight in the −125 &#181;m size fraction to 82% by weight in the 10 mm hydrocyclone overflow product while the recovery decreased from 43% to 14% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Hydrocyclone Efficiency</title><p>The partition curve is the commonest method of representing hydrocyclone efficiency and is constructed by plotting the percentage of each particle size by weight in the feed, which reports to the underflow, against the particle size. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref4">4</xref>] defined the cut point or d<sub>50</sub> size (separation size) as the point on the partition curve for which 50% of the particles in the feed of that size report to the underflow. Partition curves can be used to predict the products that would be obtained if the feed or separation size were changed. In all classifiers, it is assumed that solids of all sizes are entrained in the coarse product (underflow) liquid by short-circuiting in direct proportion to the fraction of feed water reporting to the underflow. Therefore, the partition curve can be corrected by utilising the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref8">8</xref>]:</p><p>y ' = y − R / 1 − R</p><p>where,</p><p>y' is the corrected mass fraction of a particular size reporting to underflow,</p><p>y is the actual mass fraction of that size,</p><p>R is the fraction of the feed liquid (water) recovered in the underflow.</p><p>The fraction (R) of the feed liquid recovered in the underflow was calculated in the separation processes of the two hydrocyclones (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The fraction was 21.6% and 24.4% in the separation process of kaolin by the 2-inch hydrocyclone and the 10 mm hydrocyclone respectively. This meant that</p><p>21.6% of the feed material was short-circuited with water to the underflow without classification (i.e. not separated) in the 2-inch hydrocyclone, and 24.4% of the feed material in the 10 mm hydrocyclone. Therefore, the percentage of feed recovered to the underflow should be corrected in proportion to that short-circuiting fraction.</p><p>In the 2-inch hydrocyclone, the mass balance calculation of the products showed that the percentage of the feed (yield) which reported to the overflow was 31% and 69% to the underflow. The weight percentages of the particle size analysis of the products (i.e. overflow and underflow), the partition coefficient (% of feed to U/F), and the corrected partition coefficient are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3. The results of the uncorrected and corrected of the percentage of feed to the underflow are plotted against the nominal size and illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3. The results showed that the cut point (d<sub>50</sub>) was 12 &#181;m while the corrected cut point d<sub>50(C)</sub> increased to 16 μm.</p><p>In the 10 mm hydrocyclone, the mass balance calculation of the products showed that the percentage of the feed (yield) which reported to the overflow and the underflow was 28.2% and 71.8% respectively. The weight percentage of the particle size analysis of the products (i.e. overflow and underflow), the partition coefficient (% of feed to U/F), and the corrected partition coefficient are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4.</p><p>The results of the corrected and uncorrected of the percentage of feed to the underflow are plotted against the nominal size and illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4. The results showed that the cut point (d<sub>50</sub>) was 2.2 &#181;m and the corrected d<sub>50(C)</sub> was 3.9 &#181;m.</p><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> The results of the 2-inch hydrocyclone performance on the kaolin concentration</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size interval</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Wt%</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Wt% of feed</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Reconstituted Feed%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nominal size*</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >% of feed to U/F</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uncorrected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corrected</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 - 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 - 0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 - 1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 - 4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19 - 9.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00 - 19.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.31 - 35.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.56 - 65.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.51 - 120.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.67 - 190.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Arithmetic mean.</p><table-wrap id="table14" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> The results of the 10 mm hydrocyclone performance on the kaolin concentration</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size interval</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Wt%</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Wt% of feed</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Reconstituted Feed %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nominal size*</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >% of feed to U/F</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uncorrected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corrected</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 - 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09 - 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 - 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 - 1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 - 2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.586</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28 - 4.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.539</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.88 - 9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.687</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0 - 19.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.721</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.31 - 30.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.53 - 65.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Arithmetic mean.</p><p>The results showed that passing the overflow of the 2-inch hydrocyclone through 10 mm hydrocyclone reduced the d<sub>50</sub> of the products from 16 &#181;m to 3.9 &#181;m. The kaolin content increased from 70.6% to 82.5% in the overflow products of the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Assessment of the Kaolin Product</title><p>The overflow and the underflow products from the 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones were tested by WBB Company [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref6">6</xref>] for number of physical properties. The results of the size distribution and quantity of minerals are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5, while the brightness and colour measurements are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6.</p><p>Brightness is defined as the ratio, expressed as percentage, of the radiation reflected by a body to the radiation reflected by a perfect reflecting standard (e.g. BaSO<sub>4</sub>) measured at 457 nm wavelength. Whiteness is expressed as the difference between the percentage reflectance at 570 and 457 nm. L, a, b colour space is the CIE standard of colour measurement which determine the relative colour values of a sample by detecting reflections with a defined wavelength [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref9">9</xref>]. Values of L, a, and b are usually plotted on a chromaticity diagram.</p><p>The results showed that the ISO brightness of the starting material (71.5 to 73.4) were not startling while the fired brightness (87.3 to 90.2) were good being comparable with typical commercial products from English China Clay (ECC). The fired brightness of 90.2 for the 10 mm hydrocyclone overflow was probably partly due to a low degree of vitrification because of the low alkali (Na and K) content of the product. The good results of the fired brightness were encouraging for its potential use in the ceramic industry whereas the raw brightness was less important.</p><p>The silica alumina ratio was a little higher than desirable as the alumina content should ideally be more than 35% - 36%. The iron oxides content was considered low when compared with typical products. The results of the kaolin product are displayed against commercial kaolin products used as fillers and in the ceramic industry (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>7).</p><table-wrap id="table15" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> Size distribution analysis and the kaolin and quartz quantity of the products</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−20 &#181;m</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−10 &#181;m</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−5 &#181;m</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−2 &#181;m</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >−1 &#181;m</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Quantity (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kaolin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quartz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-inch O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 mm O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 mm U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table16" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> Brightness, yellowness, and colour measurements of the kaolin products</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Brightness ISO</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yellowness</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Colour space</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2-inch O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Raw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fired*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10 mm O/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Raw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fired*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10 mm U/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Raw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fired*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*At 1200˚C; L: lightness; a &amp; b: chromaticity coordinates.</p><table-wrap id="table17" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>7</label><caption><title> Properties of kaolin produced from the kaolinitic sandstone in Jordan compared to commercial kaolin used as filler and in the ceramic industry (results of commercial products are after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102011-ref10">10</xref>])</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Application</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Filler</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ceramic</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kaolin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acme</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porcelain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyprucast</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Producer-Country</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jordan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ECCI-UK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ECCI-USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STD-UK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyprus IM-USA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kaolinite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 - 82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95 - 97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quartz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anatase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >+10 &#181;m%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2 &#181;m%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brightness ISO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.0/5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.4/7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fired Brightness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Geol. environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sedimentary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrothermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sedimentary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrothermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sedimentary</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Kaolin for paper manufacturing has to meet stringent specifications with regard to brightness, viscosity, particle size distribution, and abrasiveness. Due to the relatively high amount of quartz and low raw brightness, it is not expected that the concentrated kaolin would meet the paper manufacturing specification.</p><p>As filler, further classifying would be necessary to reduce the amount of fine quartz and increase the kaolinite content in order to upgrade it to the required specification. In the ceramic industry, despite the good fired brightness, low iron oxides, and accepted grain size distribution, the kaolinite content was still marginal for porcelain production. However, it could be used for other types of ceramic such as tableware, sanitaryware and earthenware when the results were compared with other kaolin produced by WBB.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Conclusions</title><p>The −125 &#181;m size fraction of the kaolinitic sandstone (KS) sample was used to produce a kaolin concentrate product. Hydrocyclone classification was used in the pilot study for this purpose.</p><p>A kaolin concentrate at a grade of 70.6% and a recovery of 77.7% was produced from the −125 &#181;m fraction of the kaolinitic sandstone. The overflow kaolin product was classified by the 2-inch (50.8 mm) diameter hydrocyclone at a dry mass flowrate of 0.063 tph. In the 10 mm diameter hydrocyclone, the overflow kaolin concentrate at a grade of 82.5% and a recovery of 32% was classified from the overflow of the 2-inch (50.8 mm) hydrocyclone. The product was produced at dry mass flowrate of 0.002 tph.</p><p>A continuous operation of 2-inch and 10 mm hydrocyclones working in a plant at 16 hours a day, 300 days a year, would produce a kaolin product as follows:</p><p>The mass balance calculation for the 2-inch hydrocyclone (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) showed that the feed dry mass flowrate was 0.21 tph producing an overflow (d<sub>50</sub> of 16 &#181;m) of 0.06 tph (300 tpa) at a grade of 70.6% and a recovery of 77.7%. For the 10 mm hydrocyclone, the mass balance calculation (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) showed that the feed dry mass flowrate was 0.007 tph producing an overflow (d<sub>50</sub> of 3.9 &#181;m) of 0.002 tph (9.5 tpa) at a grade of 82.5% and recovery of 32%.</p><p>These results showed that for each ton of the kaolinitic sandstone, an amount of 0.1 t of a kaolin-enriched fraction at a grade of 70.6% or an amount of 0.003t of a kaolin-enriched fraction at a grade of 82.5% could be produced.</p><p>Due to the relatively excess amount of fine quartz grains and low raw material brightness (71.5), the kaolin product was not expected to be used in the paper industry. The high fired ISO brightness (90.2) of the kaolin concentrate was due to a low degree of vitrification because of the low alkali (Na and K) content in the product. The good results of the fired brightness were encouraging for the material to be used in the ceramic industry.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The School of Chemical, Environmental, and Mining Engineering of The University of Nottingham in UK is acknowledged for hosting this research during my PhD study. Appreciations are extended to Professors Brian Atkin and Nick Miles for their support. Thanks to the technicians David Clift, Chris Somerfield and Chris Elverson for their help in the laboratory and preparation of the samples.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alali, J.M. (2020) Beneficiation of White Kaolinitic Sandstone to Produce Kaolin Concentrate from Wadi Siq-Rakyia Area in Wadi Araba, Jordan. Open Journal of Geology, 10, 829-850. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.108037</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102011-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, K. (1993) The Geology of the Wadi Gharandal Area. Map Sheet No. 3050II, Bulletin 24, NRA, Amman, Jordan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anon. (1976) British Standard 1796, Test Sieving.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradley, D. (1965) The Hydrocyclone. Pergamon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Svarovsky, L. (1984) Hydrocyclones. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Ltd., Eastbourne.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASTM D7928, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watts Blake &amp; Bearne Company (WBB) (2001) Verbal Communications. England, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, M.S., Reid, K.J. and Murray, H.H. (1991) Kaolin: Processing, Properties and Applications. Applied Clay Science, 6, 87-119. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(91)90001-P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wills, B.A. (1992) Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery. 5th Edition, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Windle, W. and Gate, L.F. (1968) Brightness Measurement. Tappi, 51, 545-551.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102011-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bristow, C.M. (1987) World Kaolin: Genesis, Exploitation and Application. Industrial Minerals, 45-59.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>