<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1106584</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-101798</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Background Environmental Radiation in a Museum in Chengdu
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Shao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hai</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shijie</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>The College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    In order to grasp the radon concentration and γ-ray radiation level in a museum in Chengdu, and evaluate the radiation damage caused to the museum staff, the radon concentration and the instantaneous dose rate of gamma rays in the museum warehouse and exhibition room were monitored and estimated the annual effective dose caused by it. The results show that the radon concentration range in the museum is 24.12 - 78.9 Bq/m3, the average is 36.17 Bq/m3, far below China’s 400 Bq/m3 standard. The range of γ air absorbed dose rate is 7.1 - 13.6 &#215; 10?8 Gy/h, the average is 10.8 &#215; 10?8 Gy/h, it is the normal natural background range. The average annual effective dose of radon and its decay products was 8.68 &#215; 10?3 - 2.84 &#215; 10?2 mSv/a, the average annual effective dose of γ radiation was 0.100 - 0.192 mSv mSv/a, and the combined dose was 0.109 - 0.220 mSv/a, far less than 1 mSv/a standard. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Radon Concentration</kwd><kwd> γ Radiation</kwd><kwd> Annual Effective Dose</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, people have realized the health effects of long-term exposure to natural radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref1">1</xref>]. Radon is the only natural radioactive rare gas in nature produced by the decay of radionuclide radium. Because of its colorless and odorless, 1432 people will unknowingly inhale it into the body. After entering the body, it decays to produce progeny and alpha rays, and long-term exposure to high levels of radon can induce lung cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref2">2</xref>]. A museum in Chengdu, Sichuan Province is a museum of geoscientific nature, which contains a variety of mineral. On the subject of radiation levels, the greatest concerns are external exposure from gamma radiation in mineral samples in museums and internal exposure from radon and its daughters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref3">3</xref>]. The purpose of this study was to determine the radon concentration and gamma radiation levels in the air in the warehouses and exhibits of the museum, and to determine the annual effective doses of radon gas, its daughters and gamma radiation to the public and staff.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Monitoring Distribution</title><p>γ radiation monitoring is based on the principle of distribution: The survey area is divided into proper size grids, and a monitoring point is selected in each grid. In the end, there were 30 points in the warehouse, 30 in the exhibition room and 30 in the yard, which made a total of 90 points. Radon gas distribution principle also uses the appropriate size grid to divide the survey area, taking one point in each grid. In the end, there were 6 locations in the warehouse and 6 exhibition rooms, with a total of 12 locations. The plan of the museum is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><p>According to the “Standard Measurement Methods of radon in Ambient Air (GB/T 14582-93)”, the sampling layout and solution requirements for indoor radon concentration measurement are as follows: 1) The sampling height is 0.8 - 1.5 m and the distance from the inner wall should not be less than 0.5 m; 2) Sampling work should be carried out normally under completely closed conditions, the outside doors and Windows must be closed, and the outside doors</p><p>should not be opened for more than a few minutes during normal access; 3) Internal and external air-conditioning systems such as ceiling fans and Windows must be stopped during sampling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref4">4</xref>]. In this survey, the radon gas measurement instrument adopted the fixed-point measurement mode for 30 min. The inlet was 1.5 m from the ground and away from walls and corners. Each point was measured three times and the average value was taken as the radon concentration at the point.</p><p>According to the “Specification for The Determination of Dose rate of Environmental Surface gamma RadiationGB14583-1993”, in this study, the γ air absorbed dose rate was measured by instantaneous measurement. The air dose rate of ambient gamma radiation at 1 m above the point was measured directly by the x-gamma dose rate meter. Each point is measured for 3 times, and the measurement time of each group of data is set at 270 s. If the data of the measurement point is abnormal, it can be measured for multiple times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Materials</title><p>The radon concentration measuring instrument is fD-216 radon measuring instrument developed by Beijing Geological Research Institute of Nuclear Industry (Range of measurement: 3 - 100,000 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>; Sensitivity: &gt;1.5 Bq・m<sup>−3</sup>/cp20m; Background: ≤0.5 cpm). Gamma dose rate was determined using the BH3103B portable X-gamma dose rate manufactured by Beijing Nuclear instrument Factory (Range of measurement: 1 - 10,000 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h; Cosmic-ray response: &#177;15%; Long-term stability: ≤ 7%; calibration factor: 1.00).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. γ Air Absorbed Dose Rate</title><p>The statistics of the measured data are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The measured data are compared with the upper and lower limits of the anomaly, and the values beyond the range are eliminated.</p><p>1) It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> that the measured data at the measuring points fall within the range of N + 3δ, all of which are reliable points, so the measured data can be used to evaluate the environmental radioactivity of the museum.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> γ Air absorbed dose rate data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >statistical magnitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >γ Air Absorbed Dose Rate (10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The total number of measurements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >standard deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6 - 7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal upper and lower limits*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.82, 6.04</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Note: Determination of upper and lower limits of anomaly (Refer to geochemical correlation methods, N &#177; 3δ distribution is recommended as the limit of high anomaly and low anomaly, respectively).</p><p>2) The content difference of different measurement points in the same measurement route is also very different, because of different geological structure, different ground materials, and different types of ore storage. The ground of some measurement points is concrete, while the ground of some measurement points is marble, and the ore type stored has a great impact on the measurement data.</p><p>The range of γ air absorbed dose rate is 7.1 - 13.6 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h, the average is 10.8 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h. Compare the results of this experiment with those of previous years: The range of γ air absorbed dose rate in Sichuan province in 1990 was 60.8 - 66.0 nGy/h, The average γ air absorbed dose rate of in China is 98.3 - 99.1 nGy/h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101798-ref6">6</xref>]. The results were slightly higher than those of Sichuan and the whole country, and were in the natural background range.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Analysis of Radon Gas Measurements</title><p>The measurement results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> that the radon concentration ranges from 24.12 to 78.9 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>, the mean value is 36.17 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>, it can be seen that the radon concentration in the museum is far lower than the Chinese standard of 400 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> that the concentration of radon in the warehouse is higher than that in the exhibition hall. The reason is that the warehouse is in a closed state all the year round, and radon gas precipitated from it accumulates all the year round. However, the exhibition hall is in an open state all the year round, and the air ventilation is relatively good, so the concentration of radon in the warehouse is higher.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Dose Assessment</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. External Exposure Dose Estimation</title><p>The estimate can be made according to the following formula:</p><p>H e = D r ⋅ K ⋅ t (1)</p><p>where H<sub>e</sub>: annual effective dose equivalent (mSv/a); D<sub>r</sub>: γ Air Absorbed Dose Rate ( G y / h ); K: Ratio of effective dose equivalent rate to air absorbed dose rate, 0.7 Sv/Gy; t: Residence time in the environment, 2000 h.</p><p>According to the formula, the maximum, minimum and average of the measured air absorbed dose rate can be substituted into the formula, and the effective dose of external irradiation caused by γ radiation can be calculated, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Estimation of Internal Exposure Due to Radon</title><p>For the estimation of internal exposure to radon, the formula for estimating the effective dose caused by radon in an equilibrium state is as follows:</p><p>H E = 1 .8 &#215; 10 − 10   C R n ⋅ t (2)</p><p>where H<sub>e</sub>: annual effective dose equivalent (mSv/a); 1.8 &#215; 10<sup>−10</sup> Sv/(Bq/(m<sup>3</sup>・h)); C<sub>Rn</sub>: Radon concentration (Bq/m<sup>3</sup>); t: The time of exposure to radon is 2000 h according to the international standard.</p><p>According to the above formula, the maximum, minimum and average value of radon concentration obtained can be substituted into it, and the effective dose of internal exposure caused by radon can be calculated as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In this survey, measurements were made of museum galleries, yard and warehouses.</p><p>The radon concentration in the museum ranged from 24.12 to 78.9 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>, with an average of 36.17 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>, it can be seen that the radon concentration in the museum is far lower than the Chinese standard of 400 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Results of radon concentration data processing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statistical magnitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Radon concentration (Bq/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The minimum value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.17</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> γ induced external effective dose</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statistic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Annual effective dose (Sv/a)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The minimum value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effective dose of internal exposure due to radon</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statistic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Annual effective dose (Sv/a)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The minimum value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.68 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The range of γ air absorbed dose rate is 7.1 - 13.6 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h, the average is 10.8 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> Gy/h. Compared the results of this experiment with those of previous years, the range of γ air absorbed dose rate in Sichuan province in 1990 was 60.8 - 66.0 nGy/h, the average γ air absorbed dose rate of in China was 98.3 - 99.1 nGy/h. Comparing the two data, it can be seen that the gamma radiation level rate in the museum is higher than that in Sichuan province and the whole country, which belongs to the normal natural low range.</p><p>The effective doses of external irradiation caused by gamma rays and internal irradiation caused by radon ranged from 0.100 to 0.192 mSv and 8.68 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> - 2.84 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> mSv, respectively. Therefore, the total annual effective dose range of radiation received by staff is 0.109 - 0.220 mSv, which is far less than the national standard of 1 mSv for public individuals.</p><p>In summary, the environmental radioactivity level of the museum is normal and will not cause any harm to the staff of the museum.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shao, Y., Hu, H. and Hu, S.J. (2020) Background Environmental Radiation in a Museum in Chengdu. Open Access Library Journal, 7: e6584. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106584</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.101798-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, K.N., Young, E.C.M., Stokes, M.J., Luo, D.L. and Zhang, C.X. (1992) Indoor Radon and Environmental Gamma Radiation in Hong Kong. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 40, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101798-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Damla, N. and Aldemir, K. (2014) Radon Survey and Soil Gamma Doses in Primary Schools of Batman Turkey. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 50, 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2014.870170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101798-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoulos, S., Manolopoulou, M. and Papastefanou, C. (2003) Assessment of Natural Radiation Exposure and Radon Exhalation from Building Materials in Greece. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 69, 225-240.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00081-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101798-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, Y., Tang, Z. and Xiao, S.G. (2014) Standard Method for Measuring Radon in the Air. Chinese Journal of Radiological Health, 23, 303-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101798-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, B. and Xi, M.X. (2002) The Measurement of Absorbed Dose Rates in Air from Terrene γ-Ray in Mountain Fores. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology, 22, 473-475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101798-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, Z.Y., Luo, G.Z. and Huang, J.J. (1992) Overview of the National Survey of Natural Environmental Radioactivity Levels (1983-1990). Radiation Protection, 12, 82-93.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>