<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2020.1070088</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-101704</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modern Postpartum Contraception: The Experience of Nabil Choucair Health Center, Dakar (Senegal)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Babacar</surname><given-names>Biaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadidiatou</surname><given-names>Ndour</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>Gassama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Youssoupha</surname><given-names>Toure</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mor</surname><given-names>Cissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdou</surname><given-names>Ndiaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoul</surname><given-names>Aziz Diouf</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamour</surname><given-names>Gueye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alassane</surname><given-names>Diouf</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Charles Moreau</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Gynecological and Obstetric Clinic of Aristide Hospital Le Dantec of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>930</fpage><lpage>945</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  In Senegal, according to the 2017 Demographic Health Survey, about 22% of married women have an unmet need for family planning. Globally, 61% of women do not have access to postpartum family planning. <b>Material and Method: </b>This is a prospective, descriptive and analytical study from March 05, 2017 to January 31, 2018. The interrogation was done in the hospital ward with filling in the data collection form. The data collected was first coded and then entered, using the sphinx software. The data analysis was done with Epi info version 7 software and included a descriptive and analytical component. <b>Results: </b>The average age of the patients was 26 years with extremes of 15 and 48 years. Average gestation was 2.3 with extremes of 1 and 8 pregnancies. More than half of the women (64.7%) had delivered by caesarean in an emergency setting. More than half of the women (66.7%) had chosen the hormonal contraceptive method within 48 hours of delivery and the implant was the type of contraceptive prescribed in almost half of the cases (49.3%). <b>Conclusion: </b>Integrating postpartum family planning into programs will ultimately help to dramatically decrease high-risk pregnancies, decrease the unmet need for family planning (FP), and improve the health and survival of mothers and children.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Contraception</kwd><kwd> Postpartum</kwd><kwd> Mother and Child Health</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Family planning (FP) is a major pillar of reproductive health care that can be provided before pregnancy, immediately after delivery, and during the first year after delivery. It is important throughout the reproductive life of a couple or an individual, and is a means of achieving the desired number of children and determining the spacing between births. Postpartum family planning (PFPP) is of particular interest for the prevention of close and unwanted pregnancies during the first 12 months after childbirth. In typical maternal and newborn health programs, the postpartum period is defined as six weeks after birth, but in the context of PPFP, this period refers to the first year after birth. Thus postpartum contraception refers to the use of agents, devices, methods and procedures to reduce the conception of a conception or to avoid it. It only refers to temporary and reversible methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Indeed, according to a consultation initiated by the World Health Organization (WHO), after a live birth, the recommended interval before planning a new pregnancy is at least 24 months, in order to reduce the risks related to maternal, perinatal and child health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref2">2</xref>]. Despite this fact, 61% of women do not use effective contraception methods within 24 months after birthing to avoid an unintended pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>It is in this context that we conducted this study whose objectives were:</p><p>- To assess the nature of contraceptive demand in the postpartum at the maternity of the Nabil Chaoucair Health Center;</p><p>- To look for factors likely to influence the acceptability of postpartum contraception.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Type and Period of Study</title><p>We conducted a looking-forward study, through a semi-structured survey form with open or closed questions, single-choice or multiple-choice questions addressed to patients. The study period ranged from 05 March 2017 to 31 January 2018.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Population</title><p>The included patients were selected among those who gave birth in the hospital from March 5, 2017 to January 31, 2018, within 48 hours of delivery. The survey period was within the 48 hours after delivery. The medical records were selected and the inclusion criteria involved:</p><p>• Being hospitalized in the maternity ward;</p><p>• Confirmed consent to participate in the study.</p><p>Patients who refused to be interviewed were not included in the study.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Data Collection</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sampling</title><p>Our population consisted of 150 patients who gave birth at Nabil Choucair Health Center during our study period.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Interrogation</title><p>The interview was conducted in the hospitalisation room with the data collection form being filled out.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Anamnesis Time Length</title><p>The average duration of the interview was twenty (20) minutes for each patient.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Items Studied</title><p>The data collection form included the following items:</p><p>• Socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, occupation, gender, etc.);</p><p>• Data from the last pregnancy and childbirth:</p><p>- Antenatal care (profile of the provider who performed the antenatal care, completeness of the follow-up, pregnancy assessment, ultrasound, tetanus prevention, pathology during pregnancy);</p><p>- Term of pregnancy;</p><p>- Delivery (route of delivery, complications);</p><p>- Newborn (birth status, weight, sex ratio, breastfeeding);</p><p>• Contraception:</p><p>- Contraceptive history of respondent new-mothers;</p><p>- Time of information on postpartum contraception;</p><p>- Contraceptive method prescribed;</p><p>- Information on adverse effects;</p><p>• Descriptive pane:</p><p>In the descriptive part, the qualitative variables were described in terms of number and in percentage.</p><p>The quantitative variables were described on average with, standard deviation, extremes, and the median.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Data Processing</title><p>The data collected was first coded and then entered using the sphinx software. The data analysis was done with the Epi info version 7 software and featured two parts:</p><p>• Descriptive section</p><p>In the descriptive section, the qualitative variables were reported by number of employees, percentage.</p><p>Quantitative variables were described in mean, standard deviation, extremes, median.</p><p>• Analytical section</p><p>It consisted of a bivariate analysis by comparing postpartum contraceptive agreement with other variables. For statistical tests, we used the Chi-square test for the percentage comparison, the student test or ANOVA for mean comparison. The difference was statistically significant when the p value was strictly below 0.05. ORs and confidence intervals [95% CI] were used to determine the strength of the link.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Descriptive Results</title><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Socio-Demographic Characteritics</title><p>&#183; Age</p><p>The mean age of the patients was 26 years with extremes range from 15 to 48 years as reported in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>&#183; Marital status</p><p>More than 3 of 4 patients were monogamous as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>&#183; Occupation</p><p>Nearly 4 out of 5 patients (78%) had no professional occupation, while students accounted for 8% as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>&#183; Level of instruction</p><p>Nearly half of the patients were uneducated (44%) while only 5.3% had a university level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Monthly income</p><p>More than 4 out of 5 patients had a monthly income of less than 50,000 FCFA (78.2 euros) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Pregnancy and Delivery</title><p>&#183; Obstetrical data</p><p>o Gestity</p><p>The mean gestation was 2.3 with extremes range from 1 to 8 pregnancies. More than one-third of the patients (39.3%) were in their first pregnancy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>o Parity</p><p>The average parity was 2.2 with extremes range from 1 to 7 births. Primiparous women accounted for 42% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>o Number of children</p><p>The average number of living children was 2 children with extremes range from 0 to 7 children.</p><p>More than half of the patients (54.7%) had 2 or more children.</p><p>&#183; Antenatal monitoring</p><p>o Pregnancy type</p><p>Pregnancy was spontaneous in more than half of the patients (63%) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>o Personnel who followed the pregnancy</p><p>Almost all women (91.3%) were monitored by midwives.</p><p>The mean number of ANCs performed was 3.5 with extremes range from 0 to 5 ANCs. Nearly one-third of the patients (29%) didn’t undergo ANC.</p><p>In addition, 69.4% of the women had undergone at least 4 ANCs, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>&#183; Pregnancy outcome</p><p>o Delivery route</p><p>More than half of the women (64.7%) had an emergency Ceasarean ection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>o Term of the pregnancy</p><p>Almost all patients (88%) had full-term deliveries (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to their occupation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pupil/student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >minor occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Patients distribution according to gestity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gestity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paucigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the parity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Patients distribution according to the type of pregnancy</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pregnancy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spontaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Planned</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unplanned</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Induced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the term of the pregnancy</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Term of the pregnancy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Premature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Newborn</p><p>o Weight</p><p>The average weight of newborns was 3137 grams (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). More than half of the newborns (54%) were male.</p><p>o Newborn outcome</p><p>Almost all newborns (97.3%) were alive.</p><p>o Breastfeeding</p><p>Exclusive breastfeeding was performed in more than 4 out of 5 patients (85.6%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the newborn’s weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2500 grams</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 - 3500 grams</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥3500 grams</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the feeding method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conducted breastfeeding</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artificial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_1_3"><title>4.1.3. Contraception</title><p>&#183; Contraception history</p><p>More than half of the patients (55.3%) were not under contraception as reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>.</p><p>&#183; Spouse’s or another person’s agreement for contraceptive choice</p><p>Overall 105 patients (70%) required the consent of a spouse or another person.</p><p>&#183; Postpartum Contraception Counseling</p><p>More than 4 out of 5 patients were discussed about contraception during the immediate post-partum period. Only 10 patients were discussed about contraception during the antenatal visit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Chosen contraceptive method</p><p>More than half of the women (66.7%) had chosen the hormonal contraceptive method within the 48 hours after giving birth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Type of contraception prescribed</p><p>The implant was the type of contraceptive prescribed in nearly half of the cases (49.3%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0).</p><p>&#183; Information on adverse effects</p><p>Almost all patients (90.7%) had been informed about precautions related to side effects.</p><p>&#183; Availability of contraceptive information sheet</p><p>More than half of the patients had received a contraceptive information sheet (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Analytical Results</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Post Partum Contraception According to Socio-Demographic Characteristics</title><p>According to socio-demographic characteristics, postpartum contraception agreement was higher among women aged 35 or older, polygamous, those who had a professional occupation with a monthly income of more than 50,000. However, the difference was not statistically significant with a p value = 0.408.</p><p>There was also a statistically significant difference lloking at the education level. Women with a high school education or higher were twice as likely to accept the postpartum contraceptive method. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2 illustrates the results.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to contraception history</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >History of contraception</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Implant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pill</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depo-provera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intra-uterine device</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the time of contraception counseling</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time of contraception counseling</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post partum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delivery room</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antenal care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delivery preparation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >postnatal care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Patient distribution according to the prescribed contraception</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of contraception prescribed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Implants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D&#233;poprovera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intra-uterine device</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pill</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advice only</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Contraceptive information sheet availability</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reasons</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >without opinion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Relationship between the use of contraceptive method and socio-demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Socio-demographic characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Contraception acceptance</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >p value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Or [IC &#224; 95%]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;25 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 34 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥35 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monogamous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polygamous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.925</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instruction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High school or more</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 [1.1 - 6.1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤50,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;50,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Post-Partum Contraception Based on Obstetrical History</title><p>Postpartum contraception agreement was almost similar depending on the obstetrical history. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3 illustrates the results.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. Post-Partum Contraception According to Delivery</title><p>The percentage of postpartum contraception acceptance was almost similar according to the delivery-related data. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4 illustrates the results.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_4"><title>4.2.4. Post-Partum Contraception Based on Newborn Data</title><p>The percentage of post-partum contraception acceptance was almost similar according to the data on fetal outcome (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_5"><title>4.2.5. Post-Partum Contraception According to Information Received on Contraception</title><p>The distribution of postpartum contraceptive agreement varied according to the information received on contraception. Women who were on contraceptive methods, those who did not require the consent of a spouse or an another person to choose a method, and those who received an information form were 2.6, 7.3 and 4.4 times more likely to accept postpartum contraception. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6 illustrates the results.</p><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Relationship between the use of contraceptive method and obstetrical history</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Obstetrical history</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Contraception acceptance</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestit&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paucigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.904</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤1 child</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.214</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥2 children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forseen pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Planned</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unplanned</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table14" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> Crossover between contraceptive method and delivery method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >delivery</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Contraception agreement</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Route of delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.634</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-Section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Full-term pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.335</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EBF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table15" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> Distribution of Postpartum Contraceptive acceptance according to newborn-related data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Newborn</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Contraception agreement</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outcome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.229</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stillbirth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="16"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> Distribution of postpartum contraception agreement according to contraceptive information</title></caption><table-wrap id="16_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Information about post partum contraception</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Contraception agreement</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >p value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >OR [IC &#224; 95%]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contraception history</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6 [1.2 - 5.7]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Need of the spouse’s agreement for the choice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3 [2.1 - 25.2]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="16_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time of information about contraception</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.801</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >During delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Information on adverse effects</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Information form</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 [1.3 - 15.5]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Their Influences on Family Planning</title><sec id="s5_1_1"><title>5.1.1. Age</title><p>Distribution by age group outlines that they were mostly young women, most of whom were under 25 years of age (46%), which is higher than the 40.5% found in the general population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref4">4</xref>]. The difference could be explained by the fact that our study was conducted mainly in urban areas.</p></sec><sec id="s5_1_2"><title>5.1.2. Marital Status</title><p>Almost all of the patients included in our study were married. These women, most of whom were in a couple, therefore had sexual activity that could be resumed quickly, which would justify more frequent use of a contraceptive method.</p></sec><sec id="s5_1_3"><title>5.1.3. Educational Level</title><p>In our sample, the educational level of the women interviewed is relatively low. Nearly half of the women had no formal education at all and one third had completed primary school. Only 5.3% of the women interviewed had attended university.</p><p>This proportion of patients with a low level of education suggests a misunderstanding of the information conveyed. Therefore, there was a statically significant difference between the level of education and contraceptive method agreement.</p></sec><sec id="s5_1_4"><title>5.1.4. Parity</title><p>In Senegal over the past 25 years, the total fertility rate has declined slowly but steadily, from 6.4 children per woman in 1986 to 6.0 in 1992, 5.7 in 1997, 5.3 in 2005, 5.0 in 2010-11 and 4.6 in 2017 [5.6]. The use of contraceptive method increases progressively with parity, from 3% among nulliparous women to 23% among women with 1 to 2 children and 27% among those with 5 or more children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>In our sample, fertility was estimated at 2 children per woman, which is lower than in the general population, probably for two reasons: our study was restricted to the postpartum period and was conducted in urban areas where fertility is lower. The majority of these women were primiparous or pauciparous, followed by large multiparous, and there was no correlation between parity and choice of contraceptive method.</p></sec><sec id="s5_1_5"><title>5.1.5. Route of Delivery</title><p>In Senegal during the period range from 2012 to 2017 the percentage of births by Caesarean section has slightly changed between 4% and 5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref6">6</xref>]. In our study 64.7% underwent a Caesarean section. This could be explained by the size of our sample and the fact that most pregnancies were affected by complications. The use contraception was similar regardless of the route of delivery.</p></sec><sec id="s5_1_6"><title>5.1.6. Breastfeeding</title><p>In our survey, most of the women (85.6%) chose to breastfeed their child. This rate is lower than that found in the overall Senegalese population (99%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref7">7</xref>]. However, in developed countries, the breastfeeding rate has decreased considerably [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>This could be justified by the fact that the study was carried out in urban areas; the physionomy of occupations being different between the city and the countryside. For example, the great diversity of urban jobs contrast with a concentration of rural populations in the agricultural sector.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Contraceptive Methods in the Postpartum Period</title><p>Our results outline that the most commonly used type of contraception is the implant (49.3%) followed by depoprovera (13.3%). The intra uterine device and the pill are used in 7.3% and 6.4% of the cases respectively. The contraceptive method chosen in our context differs from that found in most studies where the progestin-only pills are in the frontline. Thus, Froger found the pill usage in 54.2% of the cases, followed by the IUD (13.5%) and the implant (9.4%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref10">10</xref>], while in the Genton study, 43.3% of women were on the progestogen-only pills and 10% of women benefited from progestogen-based contraception with a subcutaneous implant placed in the ward before returning home [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>In the French study reported by Blangis, the majority of women had chosen oral microprogestogens accounting for 63.5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref12">12</xref>] and 65.1% in the Morgane sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Information on Side Effects</title><p>One patient out of 10 felt that they had not been informed about the side effects of certain contraceptive methods, even though the occurrence of these adverse effects is the main cause of contraceptive discontinuation.</p><p>In the literature, Stein shows that service delivery centers in Senegal were not doing enough to meet the specific needs of breastfeeding women who wanted planning services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101704-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5_4"><title>5.4. Limits of the Study</title><p>Our study involved a not too large cohort because it only included data from a health center. The duration of the study did not allow monitoring of long-term side effects of contraceptives.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The postpartum period, especially immediately after childbirth, is a period during which couples typically have multiple contacts with the health care system. Providing contraception during this period is cost-effective and efficient because it does not require significant increases in personnel, supervision, or infrastructure. In addition, for the many women who rarely use the health care system, family planning (FP) provided in the period immediately after childbirth does not require a costly and burdensome return to the facility, thereby increasing the opportunities to reach couples and increase their awareness of FP. Integrating postpartum family planning into programmes helps to expand services for women in the first year after delivery, and to increase the use of FP among women and their partners during this first year, and will ultimately lead to a significant reduction in high-risk pregnancies, a decrease in unmet need for FP, and improved maternal and child health and survival.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Biaye, B., Ndour, K., Gassama, O., Toure, Y., Ciss&#233;, M., Ndiaye, A., Diouf, A.A., Gueye, M., Diouf, A. and Moreau, J.C. (2020) Modern Postpartum Contraception: The Experience of Nabil Choucair Health Center, Dakar (Senegal). Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 930-945. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1070088</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.101704-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Department of Reproductive Health World Health Organization (2005) Admissibility Criteria for the Adoption and Continued Use of Contraceptive Methods. 3rd Edition, WHO Press Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO Library (2014) Programming Strategies for Postpartum Family Planning. World Health Organization, Geneva. 
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/99116/1/9789242506495_eng.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ANAES Breastfeeding (2002) Implementation and Continuation in the First 6 Months of the Child’s Life. 
http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/Allaitement_rap.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blangis, F., Lopes, P., Branger, B., et al. (2013) The Postnatal Contraception: Upon 600 Patients of Whom 129 Were Postnatal Controlled. Obstetrics and Fertility Gynecology, 41, 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.07.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Agency for Health Accreditation and Assessment (2004) Strategies for Choosing Contraceptive Methods in Women. Geneva, Switzerland, 47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Agency for Statistics and Demography, Senegal (2017) Continuous Demographic and Health Survey (EDS-Continues). Official Journal of the Republic of Senegal, Dakar, Senegal, 17-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stein, K., Measham, D. and Winikoff, B. (1998) The Quality of Family Planning Services for Breastfeeding Women in Senegal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 188-190.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">High Authority for Health (2013) Contraception in Postpartum Women. The Midwife Review, 12, 186-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmood, S.E., Srivastava, A., Shrotriya, V.P., Shaifali, I. and Mishra, P. (2011) Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Rural Bareilly. Indian Journal of Community Health, 23, 56-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Genton, E. (2015) Review of the Information Received by Women on Postpartum Contraception during Their Stay in Childbirth. Final Thesis, Joseph Fourier University, Saint Martindale, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graesslin, O., Dedegker, F., Grolier, F., et al. (2004) Patch, Ring, Implants. New Hormonal Contraceptives. Update in Obstetric Gynecology. National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Vigot, 209-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonacho, I., Pita, S. and Gomez-Besteiro, M.I. (1999) Eight Years with the Same IUD. Contraception, 59, 233-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(99)00022-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101704-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robin, G., Massart, P., Graizeau, F. and Du Masgenet, B.G. (2008) La Contraception du Post-Partum: Etat des Connaissances Postpartum Birth Control: State-of-the-Art. Gynécologie Obstétrique &amp; Fertilité, 36, 603-615. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.02.023</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>