<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2020.117033</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-101584</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Co-Doped Rare-Earth (La, Pr) and Co-Al Substituted M-Type Strontium Hexaferrite: Structural, Magnetic, and Mossbauer Spectroscopy Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Madhav</surname><given-names>L. Ghimire</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dom</surname><given-names>L. Kunwar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiba</surname><given-names>N. Dahal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dipesh</surname><given-names>Neupane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunghyun</surname><given-names>Yoon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanjay</surname><given-names>R. Mishra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Physics and Astronomy, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Physics and Materials Science, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Gunsan National University, Gunsan, South Korea</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>474</fpage><lpage>493</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present study investigates the influence of La
  <sup>3+</sup> and Pr
  <sup>3+</sup> doping on the structural, magnetic properties, and hyperfine fields of Sr
  <sub>0.7</sub>RE
  <sub>0.3</sub>Fe
  <sub>12-2x</sub> Co
  <sub>x</sub>Al
  <sub>x</sub>O
  <sub>19</sub>, (RE: La
  <sup>3+</sup> and Pr
  <sup>3+</sup>, 
  <em>x</em> = 0.0 - 0.8) hexaferrite compounds prepared via auto-combustion technique. The XRD analysis shows a linear decrease in a and c lattice and unit cell volume contraction with the content 
  <em>x</em>. The room temperature magnetic study shows that for the Pr
  <sup>3+</sup> doped Sr
  <sub>0.7</sub>Pr
  <sub>0.3</sub>Fe
  <sub>12-2x</sub> Co
  <sub>x</sub>Al
  <sub>x</sub>O
  <sub>19</sub> (Pr
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM), the magnetization value monotonically decreases while for La
  <sup>3+</sup> doped Sr
  <sub>0.7</sub>La
  <sub>0.3</sub>Fe
  <sub>12-2x</sub>Co
  <sub>x</sub>Al
  <sub>x</sub>O
  <sub>19</sub> (La
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM) magnetization value shows a noticeable increase in magnetization value with 
  <em>x</em>. The coercivity of the Pr
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM compound was observed to decrease while that of the La
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM compound showed a marked 40% increase at 
  <em>x</em> = 0.2 (~5829 Oe) in comparison to undoped SrFe
  <sub>12</sub>O
  <sub>19</sub> (~3918 Oe). A difference in Curie temperature was also observed, with Tc ~ 525
  &amp;deg;C at 
  <em>x</em> = 0.4 for Pr
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM and Tc = 505
  &amp;deg;C for 
  <em>x</em> = 0.4 for La
  <sup>3+</sup>-SrM compound. The observed differences in magnetic properties have been explained on the basis of the site occupancy of Co
  <sup>2+</sup> and Al
  <sup>3+</sup> in the presence of rare-earth ions. The presence of non-magnetic rare-earth ion, La
  <sup>3+</sup>, improved saturation magnetization, and coercivity and deemed suitable replacement for Sr
  <sup>2+</sup>. The hyperfine parameters namely quadrupole shift showed a decrease with the La3
  <sup>+</sup> or Pr
  <sup>3+</sup> doping independent of (Co
  <sup>2+</sup>-Al
  <sup>3+</sup>) ions doping. Overall, the Mossbauer analysis suggests that the (Co
  <sup>2+</sup>-Al
  <sup>3+</sup>) impurities prefer occupancy at 2
  <em>a</em> site.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Doped Hexaferrite</kwd><kwd> M-Type Hexaferrite</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Diffraction</kwd><kwd> Mossbauer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The M-type hexaferrite, Strontium hexaferrite, is an excellent candidate for technological applications because of its high uniaxial magneto-crystalline anisotropy, large magnetization, high permeability, low conductive losses, excellent chemical stability, corrosion resistance and excellent high-frequency response [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref3">3</xref>]. Strontium hexaferrite has been widely used as materials for industrial applications, such as in microwave devices, small motors, electromagnetic wave absorber, and ferroxdures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref5">5</xref>]. Besides this, the popularity of strontium hexaferrite is also due to its economic success, which is its low price per unit available magnetic energy and its wide availability. So far, efforts have been made to further improve electrical, dielectric and magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite by means of doping, heat treatment, ion substitution, and processing conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>In M-type hexaferrite, the structure is comprised of 64 ions per hexagonal unit cell on 11 distinct basis sites. The 24 Fe<sup>3+</sup> iron atoms of a unit cell occupy five different interstitial sites: three octahedral sites (2a, 12k, and 4f<sub>2</sub>), one tetrahedral site (4f<sub>1</sub>) and one trigonal bi-pyramidal site (2b). The coupling of these sites by superexchange interaction via O− 2 gives rise to a ferrimagnetic structure. The sites 12k, 2a, and 2b are sites with spin up while sites 4f<sub>2</sub> and 4f<sub>1</sub> are sites with the downs-spin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref10">10</xref>]. This provides an ample opportunity to tune the magnetic properties of M-type hexaferrite compound by carefully engineering site occupancy in favor of increasing net magnetization of the compound. In view of this, attempts are made with either partial substitution of Sr<sup>2+</sup> or Fe<sup>3+</sup> sites. For example, substitution with non-magnetic ions such as Al<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref12">12</xref>], Zn<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref13">13</xref>], Ga<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref14">14</xref>] and Cd<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref16">16</xref>] and magnetic ions such as Co<sup>2+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref17">17</xref>] and Cr<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref18">18</xref>] at Fe sites, or with the partial substitution of Sr<sup>2+</sup> site by RE<sup>3+</sup> such as La<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref20">20</xref>], Nd<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref21">21</xref>], Sm<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref23">23</xref>] and Pr<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref24">24</xref>] ions, and substitution of Sr<sup>2+</sup>/Fe<sup>3+</sup> together with Pr-Zn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref25">25</xref>], La-Cu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref26">26</xref>], and La-Zn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref27">27</xref>]. The majority of these studies have attributed changes in the magnetic behavior of doped SrM either to the site-occupancy, which perturbs exchange interaction between Fe<sup>3+</sup>-O<sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup>Fe<sup>3+</sup>, anisotropy changes occurring at 2b sites due to perturbation in electric field gradient or extrinsic features such as particle size.</p><p>Doping of non-magnetic Al<sup>3+</sup> in SrFe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> has been reported to bring a considerable enhancement in the coercivity along with a reduction in saturation magnetization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref29">29</xref>]. Thus with the Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution, in spite of a large increase in the coercivity, the compound attains abysmal magnetization value. A strategy could be designed to keep both coercivity and magnetization value high. In the present work, an attempt is made to co-doped Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> in the SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> compound. Magnetic ion Co<sup>2+</sup> (~3.7 μ<sub>B</sub>) is chosen to maintain high magnetization value, while Al<sup>3+</sup> doping is expected to maintain high coercivity value in SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>. Furthermore, Lechevallier et al. reported that the only light rare-earth enters the structure, which a solubility that is related to the shape of the charge distribution of the 4f electrons to its surroundings in the crystal structure. Thus, only those rare-earth ions have easy accommodation at the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site, whose surroundings favor an oblate electronic distribution. This makes Pr and Nd (with oblate 4f charge distribution, negative Stevens constant) ideal candidate to occupy the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref25">25</xref>]. Furthermore, Co<sup>2+</sup> ions were reported to modify the surroundings of the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site, improving the introduction of rare-earth ios with oblate electronic distributions, in fact, the presence of Co<sup>2+</sup> increases the solubility of Pr<sup>3+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref25">25</xref>]. Also, RE<sup>3+</sup>-Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup>, co-substitution naturally maintains the charge neutrality condition in the compound. With the substitution of RE<sup>3+</sup> for the Sr<sup>2+</sup>, the extra positive charge is compensated by the substitution of Co<sup>2+</sup> at the Fe<sup>3+</sup> site. In the absence of Co<sup>2+</sup>, one of the Fe<sup>3+</sup> has to convert to Fe<sup>2+</sup>, which has a deleterious effect on the magnetization. With this strategy in mind, the present study investigates, the influence of the 1) rare-earth substitution, Pr<sup>3+</sup>, and La<sup>3+</sup>, at the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site and 2) Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution at Fe<sup>3+</sup> sites on the overall magnetic properties of the Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> compound.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>The series of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> (RE: La<sup>3+</sup> and Pr<sup>3+</sup>, x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) compounds were prepared by auto-combustion method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref11">11</xref>]. Nitrate salts of Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>∙9H<sub>2</sub>O (Sigma Aldrich, 99%), Sr(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (Sigma Aldrich, 99%), Al(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>∙9H<sub>2</sub>O (Sigma Aldrich, 99%), RE(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>∙9H<sub>2</sub>O (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) and C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>7</sub> (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) were selected for the synthesis Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub> Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> compounds. The stoichiometric amount of nitrates salts and citric acid were mixed in 25 ml of deionized water under constant stirring on a hot plate at 80˚C for about 30 minutes. Aqueous ammonia was added dropwise in the homogeneous mixture until the pH value of the solution reached 6.5. The intermediate precipitate was heated at 100˚C on a hot plate under stirring until the viscous brown gel is formed. The temperature is suddenly increased to 300˚C to turn it into magnetic powder. Powders were calcined in air at 1000˚C for twelve hours. The precursor used in the preparation of 1 g of sample is listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The crystal structure and phase purity of the obtained samples were identified by analyzing x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern collected via Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu K<sub>α</sub> radiation source (λ ~ 0.154056 nm). Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) was used to collect hysteresis loops of the samples at room temperature in the maximum field of 1.2 T. Curie temperature, Tc, were measured using Thermogravimetric analyzer, TGA, (DuPont 910) equipped with a permanent magnet. Room temperature <sup>57</sup>Fe Mossbauer spectroscopy was</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Stoichiometry weight of of SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12-2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> and Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12-2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Mass (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >La(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>∙9H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>∙9H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.573</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Lar<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.359</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.951</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.355</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.780</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.173</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.695</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.054</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.521</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.507</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.272</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>employed to derive hyperfine parameters. The Mossbauer spectrometer (SEE Co. Minneapolis, MN USA) was calibrated against α-Fe foil. The Mossbauer spectra were analyzed using WMOSS software (SEE Co. Minneapolis, MN USA).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>The room temperature XRD pattern of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> (RE: La<sup>3+</sup> and Pr<sup>3+</sup>, x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. XRD patterns of the substituted compounds indicated the presence of a magnetoplumbite structure (ICCD 080-1198) corresponding to the hexagonal P63/mmc symmetry phase group without any secondary phase. The lattice parameters of the compound were calculated from their inter-planar spacing d<sub>hkl</sub> corresponding to the major peaks (107), (114), and (008) using equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref30">30</xref>]:</p><p>d ( h k l ) = ( 4 ( h 2 + h k + k 2 ) 3 a 2 + l 2 c 2 ) − 1 2 (1)</p><p>where h, k, and l are Miller indices. The calculated lattice parameters a and c of the hexaferrites are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The plot for a and c as a function of doping content is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. A linear decrease in the lattice parameters a and c with the doping content was observed. The linear decrease in the lattice parameter may occur due to the substitution of Al<sup>3+</sup> (ionic radii, r ~ 0.51 &#197;) and</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Lattice parameters of SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> and Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> as obtained from XRD pattern using Equation (1) and crystalline size using Equation (2)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V (&#197;<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c/a</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crystallite size (nm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >686.707</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >688.498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.345</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.869</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >686.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.900</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.867</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >684.758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.670</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.964</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >682.798</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.910</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.869</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681.155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.070</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.873</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >687.308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.825</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >687.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.640</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.915</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >684.448</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.985</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >683.225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.210</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681.995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Co<sup>2+</sup> (r ~ 0.72 &#197;) for Fe<sup>3+</sup> (r ~ 0.64 &#197;) and smaller La<sup>3+</sup> (r ~ 1.172 &#197;) and Pr<sup>3+</sup> (r ~ 1.13 &#197;) for the Sr<sup>2+</sup> (r ~ 1.32 &#197;) ions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref31">31</xref>]. According to Wagner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref32">32</xref>], an examination of c/a parameter ratio may be used to quantify the structure type, as the M-type (magnetoplumbite) structure can be assumed if the ratio is observed to be in the range 3.917 and 3.963. As per <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the c/a ratios of as-prepared samples are in the range of 3.908 to 3.919, assuring that the as-prepared samples have maintained the M-type structure.</p><p>The crystallite size of as-synthesized particles was calculated using Scherrer’s equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref33">33</xref>]:</p><p>D ( h k l ) = k λ / ( β cos ϑ ) (2)</p><p>where k denotes the Scherrer constant (k = 0.9), λ is the wavelength of x-ray source (λ = 0.154056 nm), β is the full-width-half-maximum of a diffraction peak and θ is the diffraction angle. As listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the crystallite size of as-synthesized samples is in the range of 54 to 77 nm. In the comparison of the pure SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> sample with a crystallite size of 80.7 nm, the doped compounds show reduced crystallite size. Grain refinement is usually observed in rare-earth and doped oxide compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref34">34</xref>]. This grain refinement is reported to result from the 1) increased microstrain and defect density with substitution content and 2) diffusion of substituent element to the grain boundaries, the migration that restrains the grain growth by lowering down the grain growth mobility. If the retarding force generated is more than the driving force for the grain growth due to dopants, the movement of the grain boundary is impeded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref35">35</xref>].</p><p>The room temperature hysteresis loops, M vs. H, of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The magnetic parameters viz. saturation magnetization, Ms, remanence, Mr, and coercivity, Hc were extracted from the hysteresis loops and are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The M vs. H curves show hard ferrites behaviors with high coercivity. The magnetic properties have been changed significantly upon RE<sup>3+</sup> and Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution in Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co-Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> as compared to undoped ferrite SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>. The Ms value of Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM is observed to have a maximum value of 86 emu/g for x = 0.2 but decreases with Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> content and achieves a minimum value of 65 emu/g for x = 0.8. However, in the case of La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM, the Ms increases with x and attains a maximum value of 87 emu/g at x = 0.8. As compared to pure SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM displays a noticeable 20% enhancement while Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM shows a 10% reduction in the Ms value. The variation of Mr and Ms as a function of x content is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The value of Mr follows a trend similar to that of Ms. As explained in the Mossbauer section, for series of compounds shows the marked preference of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> for the 2a site, a site with the spin-up moment. Despite the substitution of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> at the 2a site with the up-spin moment, the magnetization of La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM displayed a marked increase in the magnetization value with the substitution. A possible explanation for this observation is that the substitution of non-magnetic La<sup>3+</sup> at the Sr<sup>2+</sup> 1) could enhance hyperfine fields at 12k site due to strengthening in the Fe<sup>3+</sup>-O<sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup>Fe<sup>3+</sup> superexchange interaction giving higher net magnetization. This increase in the hyperfine field of 12k site is evident from the Mossabuer analysis, and 2) may increase the spin canting at the near-neighbor 4f2 site (Sr<sup>2+</sup>-4f2 ~ 0.366 nm), which results in a positive contribution to the overall magnetic moment. However, the possibility of Co<sup>2+</sup> occupying a 4f2 site cannot be ignored, which increases the net positive moment per unit cell of the compound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref37">37</xref>]</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Magnetic parameters of SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> and Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> measured using VSM. Curie temperature, Tc, of samples was measured using TGA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ms (emu/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mr (emu/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mr/Ms</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hc (Oe)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tc (˚C)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >458.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >506.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >492.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >455.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >456.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >428.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >523.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >505.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x = 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >489.19</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref39">39</xref>]. On the other hand, the substitution of magnetic Pr<sup>3+</sup> at the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site may not allow spin-canting at the 4f2 site, and with the replacement of Fe<sup>3+</sup> at the 2a site, the overall magnetic moment decreases in the Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM compounds.</p><p>The variation of coercivity, Hc, of La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM and Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM compounds as a function of x content is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Consistently La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM samples display higher Hc values than Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM compounds for all x values. The Hc value of La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM displays a marked ~50% increase at x = 0.2 when compared to that of pure SrFe<sub>12</sub>O (Hc ~ 3918 Oe). On the other hand, Hc value decreases linearly with increasing the x content for the Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM compound. Being an extrinsic</p><p>property, the coercivity depends on factors such as crystal structure, morphological features, elemental composition, and defects. In general, Hc can be expressed as,</p><p>H c = ( α ( 2 K 1 / ( μ o M s ) ) − N ( M r + M s ) / μ o (3)</p><p>where α is the microstructure factor which has a reciprocal dependence on the grain size, N is the demagnetization factor, 2K1/(μ<sub>o</sub>M<sub>s</sub>) is the Ha is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref39">39</xref>]. In the M-type hexaferrite, magnetocrystalline anisotropy mainly originates from Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions at the 2b and 4f1 site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref41">41</xref>] ]. It has been reported that Al<sup>3+</sup> ions have a preference for 4f2, 2a, and 12k sites, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref43">43</xref>], and Co<sup>2+</sup> ions mainly prefer 4f2 (mainly) and 2a sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref44">44</xref>]. In accordance with the Mossbauer analysis, discussed later, it is observed that in both series of samples studied herein, the Co<sup>3+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> ions have a preference for the 2a site. Thus the intrinsic coercivity as per Equation (3), should increase for both series of samples due to the increase in the magnetocrystalline anisotropy, as the site 2b remains unaffected with the said substitution. However, from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, it is observed that the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample shows a maximum (5829 Oe) in coercivity value at x = 0.2, followed by a decrease with increasing x content in the sample. On the other hand, the Hc value of the Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample shows a monotonous decrease with the x content in the sample. Also, the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample displays consistently higher coercive field value as compared to Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM. In a comparative study on Sr(La/Pr)Fe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> samples it was reported that the Pr<sup>3+</sup> doped Sr(Pr)Fe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> displayed higher coercivity than La<sup>3+</sup> doped Sr(Pr)Fe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> sample because of the higher magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the former. However, the contrary results in the present study can be explained by taking microstructure factor, α, in account in Equation (3) above. The La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM samples have relatively smaller crystallite size as compared to Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM; as a result, the microstructure factor, α, will have a higher value than that of Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample. This will make the first term in the Equation (3) above greater than for La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM as compared to that for Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM. The observed decrease in coercivity with the substitution could be attributed to the fact that the second term in the Equation (3) decreases much rapidly as compared to the αHa term.</p><p>The Curie temperature, Tc, of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The maximum Tc value for La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM and Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM was observed to be 505 and 525 K, respectively at x = 0.40. After attaining maximum value, the Tc decreases gradually for x &gt; 0.40. The overall decrease in Tc after attaining maximum can be explained on the basis of three combined effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref46">46</xref>], 1) substitution of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> ions for Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions reduce the Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions and hence leads to a reduction of Fe<sup>3+</sup>-O<sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup>-Fe<sup>3+</sup> number of superexchange interaction and strength and 2) lattice contraction with the substitution alters the bond length and angle of Fe<sup>3+</sup>-O<sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup>-Fe<sup>3+</sup> from its optimum interaction strength value. However, in the beginning, Tc drops down for x = 0.20, where presumably Fe<sup>3+</sup> might be substituted more with non-magnetic Al<sup>3+</sup> and above combined effect become prevalent. However, the increasing magnetic Co<sup>2+</sup> ion content helps regain the strength of the superexchange interaction and hence increases the Tc value for x = 0.40 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref47">47</xref>].</p><p>In order to investigate the site occupancies of transition metal ions and resulting hyperfine parameters in the samples, Mossbauer spectra were collected at room temperature. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the fitted Mossbauer spectra as a function of content x in the as-synthesized samples. All spectra consist of five Lorentzian sextets originating from 12k, 4f1, 4f2, 2a, and 2b crystallographic sites of Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions. The spectra were fitted with the constrain that all the linewidths of the absorption lines were the same. The extracted Mossbauer parameters are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(b). The observed sequences of the magnetic hyperfine magnetic fields, HF (4f2 &gt; 2a &gt; 4f1 &gt; 12k &gt; 2b) and isomer shift, δ (the isomer shifts follow the sequence of 4f2 &gt; 12k &gt; 2a &gt; 2b &gt; 4f1) for both samples are in agreement with the reported results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref47">47</xref>].</p><p>It is well known that the magnitude of the hyperfine magnetic field at the Fe<sup>3+</sup> site depends on the distribution of neighboring magnetic cations. The hyperfine field, HF, the parameter of the most intense 12k line effectively shows no variation</p><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Hyperfine parameters of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> extracted from fitting room temperature Mossbauer spectra; (b) Hyperfine parameters of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> extracted from fitting room temperature Mossbauer spectra</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HF (kOe)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QS (mm/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IS (mm/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Area (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >12k (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >416.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4f1 (&#175;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >491.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >480.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >480.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >475.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4f2 (&#175;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >517.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >507.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >511.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >509.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >509.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >506.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2a (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2b (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HF (kOe)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QS (mm/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IS (mm/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Area (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >12k (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4f1 (&#175;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >491.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >489.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >485.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >482.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >482.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4f1 (&#175;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >517.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >516.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >511.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >509.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2a (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >508.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2b (&#173;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>with x in Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM, while HF increases with x in the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample. The increase in HF value of La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM is in agreement with the observed increase in the saturation magnetization, Ms, with content x. Other lines 4f1, 2a, and 4f2 show a monotonous decrease in HF with x.</p><p>The isomer shift plot as a function of x is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. The isomer shift, δ, for both series of samples for all sites visibly remains invariant except for the 2b site. Also, the 2b site’s isomer shift value clearly reflects the influence of the</p><p>rare-earth ion in the compound. In the presence of rare-earth ion, the isomer shift value of 2b drops significantly as compared to that of a pure SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> compound. Isomer shift is a measure of 3d electron density at the nucleus of the Fe atom. The closest sites of Sr<sup>2+</sup> sites are 12k, 4f2, and 2b. The 2b sites are located in the same plane as Sr<sup>2+</sup> ions (at a distance of 0.340 nm), while the 4f2 and 12k sites are located in the adjacent planes at nearly the same distance from Sr<sup>2+</sup> viz. Sr<sup>2+</sup>-12k ~ 0.365 nm and Sr<sup>2+</sup>-4f2 ~ 0.366) nm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref49">49</xref>]. Pr [Xe] 4f<sup>3</sup> 6s<sup>2</sup> and La[Xe] 5d<sup>1</sup> 6s<sup>2</sup> with more electrons as compared to Sr (Kr[5s<sup>2+</sup>]) has a negative effect on the isomer shift, that is increased substitution of Pr<sup>3+</sup> or La<sup>3+</sup> increases the net s-electron charge density at the 2b site, which in turn decreases the isomer shift value at the 2b site.</p><p>The quadrupole shift, QS, values of 2b site show a similar ~10% drop in both Pr<sup>3+</sup> and La<sup>3+</sup> substituted samples. The quadrupole values for all sites remain invariant with x for both series of samples. It is known that QS is a measure of the asymmetry of a crystallographic site. Since the 2b sites are located in the same plane as Sr<sup>2+</sup>, the substitution of the smaller Pr<sup>3+</sup> and La<sup>3+</sup> for Sr<sup>2+</sup> ions induces a deformation, which affects the electronic site symmetry of the nearby 2b site. Due to the substitution of smaller La<sup>3+</sup> and Pr<sup>3+</sup> ion for Sr<sup>2+</sup> ion, the lattice constant c contracts. Consequently, large Fe-O distances parallel to the c-axis decreases. As a result, the oxygen bipyramid of the 2b-site becomes more symmetric, which is in agreement with the observed reduction in the quadrupole shift value with content x. A similar decrease in 2b quadrupole splitting originating from the presence of La<sup>3+</sup> substitution has been reported in Sr<sub>1</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>x</sub>La<sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>y</sub>Co<sub>y</sub>O<sub>19</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref39">39</xref>].</p><p>A close examination of the fitted spectra shows a decreasing trend of 2a absorption intensities with increasing x. Without Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> co-doping, the intensity of 2a site lines in both Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> and Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> are nearly the same as that of undoped SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub>. However, with the substitution of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3</sup>, the 2a absorption area decreased linearly and finally disappeared at x = 0.6 and 1.0 for La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM and Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample, respectively. This suggests preferential occupation of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3</sup> for the 2a site. It has already been reported that Al<sup>3+</sup> ion prefers 12k and 2a site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref50">50</xref>] while Co<sup>2+</sup> was reported to enter 4f2 site in Sr<sub>1</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>x</sub>La<sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101584-ref51">51</xref>]. There is only one 2a site in every one formula unit of M-type hexaferrite. Therefore, the fact that the 2a absorption line of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>La<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub> disappeared completely at x = 0.6 means that all the Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3</sup> dopants almost exclusively go into 2a site. In the case when x &gt; 0.5, the excessive Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3</sup> dopant should occupy the crystallographic sites other than the 2a site. On the other hand, in the case of Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, 2a absorption intensity has decreased linearly and has completely diminished at x = 1.0, which indicates that all the 2a sites become full when x = 1.0. This suggests that only half of the Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> dopant occupies the 2a site compared to the case of the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM sample. Then, the other half of the 2a site should be occupied by Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions through the range of x examined. In the case of Pr<sup>3+</sup> series samples, a slight decline in the absorption area for the most intense 12k site is observed, while in the La<sup>3+</sup> containing samples, 12k areal almost remains constant. Thus it seems that the excessive Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> dopant occupies the 2a site and 12k site in Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Pr<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub>. The above observation clearly indicates that the tendency of 12k site occupation by the Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> dopant is affected by the species of rare-earth ions at the Sr<sup>2+</sup> site. Where Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> impurity mostly prefers 2a site and its preference for 12k site is enhanced in the presence of Pr<sup>3+</sup> rather than La<sup>3+</sup>, once the 2a site is completely filled. This observation is interesting considering the fact that there are no 2a sites in the vicinity of Sr<sup>2+</sup>, and hence the substitution at Sr<sup>2+</sup> with rare-earth ions is not expected to influence the site occupancy at the 2a site. Furthermore, the physical reason for the preferential site occupancy of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> in the presence of La<sup>3+</sup> or Pr<sup>3+</sup> is not clear at this stage. Mossbauer spectroscopy cannot discriminate against the site occupancies of both Co<sup>2+</sup> and Al<sup>3+</sup> ions separately. But one scenario is that Co<sup>2+</sup> ions might not prefer the 2a site in the presence of Pr<sup>3+</sup> ion, which needs further investigation.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The structural, magnetic, and Mossbauer spectrum study of the influence of rare-earth La<sup>3+</sup> and Pr<sup>3+</sup> on Sr<sub>0.7</sub>RE<sub>0.3</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>2x</sub>Co<sub>x</sub>Al<sub>x</sub>O<sub>19</sub>, (RE: La and Pr) hexaferrite compounds were investigated. Overall, dopant ion brings a unit cell contraction, which affects the Curie temperature and saturation magnetization of both series of samples. La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM samples show marked improvement in the magnetization value, while Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM samples show deterioration in Ms value with the Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution. This is suggestive of the fact that magnetic Pr<sup>3+</sup>, unlike non-magnetic La<sup>3+</sup> (no 4f electrons), substitution for Sr<sup>2+</sup> could be detrimental to the overall magnetization behavior of the SrFe<sub>12</sub>O<sub>19</sub> compound. The Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution brings in grain refinement, more for the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM than Pr<sup>3+</sup>-SrM, which has a considerable impact on the coercivity values of the compound. The Mossbauer spectral analysis revealed 2a as a preferred substitution for Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> ions for both series of samples. Due to lattice contraction, the 2b site displayed a considerable reduction in its quadrupole shift value. The improved hyperfine field for the 12k site in the La<sup>3+</sup>-SrM series is attributed to the increase in its magnetization value with the substitution of Co<sup>2+</sup>-Al<sup>3+</sup> ions for Fe<sup>3+</sup>. For the study, it is concluded that the substitution of rare-earth ions with 4f charge distribution for Sr<sup>2+</sup> could be detrimental to the overall magnetic performance of the M-type hexaferrite materials.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ghimire, M.L., Kunwar, D.L., Dahal, J.N., Neupane, D., Yoon, S. and Mishra, S.R. (2020) Co-Doped Rare-Earth (La, Pr) and Co-Al Substituted M-Type Strontium Hexaferrite: Structural, Magnetic, and Mossbauer Spectroscopy Study. Materials Sciences and Applications, 11, 474-493. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2020.117033</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.101584-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, N., Yang, K. and Mingyuan, G. (2010) Microwave Absorption Properties of La-Substituted M-Type Strontium Ferrites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 490, 609-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riches, E.E. (1972) Ferrites: A Review of Materials and Applications. 3rd Edition, Mills &amp; Boon, Richmond.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chin, T.-S. (2000) Permanent Magnet Films for Applications in Microelectromechanical Systems. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 209, 75-79.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00649-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, P., De Francisco, C., Munoz, J.M., Iniguez, J., Torres, L. and Zazo, M. (1996) Influence of Sintering Atmosphere on the Magnetic After-Effect in Strontium Ferrites. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 157-158, 123-124.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)01070-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jin, Z.Q., Tang, W., Zhang, J.R., Lin, H. and Du, Y.W. (1998) Magnetic Properties of Isotropic SrFe12O19 Fine Particles Prepared by Mechanical Alloying. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 182, 231-237.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00679-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qiao, L., You, L., Zheng, J., Jiang, L. and Sheng, J. (2007) The Magnetic Properties of Strontium Hexaferrites with La-Cu Substitution Prepared by SHS Method. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 318, 74-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.04.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Besenicar, S. and Miha, D. (1991) High Coercivity Sr Hexaferrites. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Material, 101, 307-309.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(91)90763-Z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rezlescu, L., Rezlescu, E., Popa, P.D. and Rezlescu, N. (1999) Fine Barium Hexaferrite Powder Prepared by the Crystallization of Glass. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 193, 288-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00442-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhong, W., Ding, W.P., Zhang, N., Hong, J.M., Yan, Q.J. and Du, Y.W. (1997) Key Step in Synthesis of Ultrafine BaFe12O19 by Sol-Gel Technique. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 168, 196-202.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00664-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kojima, H. (1982) Chapter 5. Fundamental Properties of Hexagonal Ferrites with Magnetoplumbite Structure. In: Handbook of Ferromagnetic Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 3, 305-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-9304(05)80091-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, H., Rai, B.K., Mishra, S.R., Nguyen, N.N. and Liu, J.P. (2012) Physical and Magnetic Properties of Highly Aluminum Doped Strontium Ferrite Nanoparticles Prepared by Auto-Combustion Route. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 324, 2602-2608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirtcliffe, N.J., Thompson, S., O’keefe, E.S. Appleton, S. and Perry, C.C. (2007) Highly Aluminium Doped Barium and Strontium Ferrite Nanoparticles Prepared by Citrate Auto-Combustion Synthesis. Materials Research Bulletin, 42, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fang, Q.Q., Liu, Y.M., Yin, P. and Li, X.G. (2001) Magnetic Properties and Formation of Sr Ferrite Nanoparticle and Zn, Ti/Ir Substituted Phases. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 234, 366-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00428-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iqbal, M.J., Ashiq, M.N., Gomes, P.H. and Munoz, J.M. (2008) Synthesis, Physical, Magnetic and Electrical Properties of Al-Ga Substituted Co-Precipitated Nanocrystalline Strontium Hexaferrite. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 320, 881-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.09.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albanese, G., Carbucicchio, M. and Deriu, A. (1974) Temperature Dependence of the Sublattice Magnetizations in Al- and Ga-Substituted M-Type Hexagonal Ferrites. Physica Status Solidi, 23, 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210230202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashiqa, M.N., Iqbalb, M.J. and Gulc, I.H. (2009) Structural, Magnetic and Dielectric Properties of Zr-Cd Substituted Strontium Hexaferrite (SrFe12O19) Nanoparticles. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 487, 341-345.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Breton, J.M., Teillet, J., Wiesinger, G., Morel, A., Kools, F. and Tenaud, P. (2002) Mossbauer Investigation of Sr-Fe-O Hexaferrites with La-Co Addition. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 38, 2952-2954.https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2002.803177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nourbakhsh, A.A., Noorbakhsh, M., Nourbakhsh, M., Shaygan, M. and Mackenzie, K.J.D. (2011) The Effect of Nano Sized SrFe12O19 Additions on the Magnetic Properties of Chromium-Doped Strontium-Hexaferrite Ceramics. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 22, 1297-1302.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-011-0303-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X.S., Zhong, W., Yang, S., Yu, Z., Gu, B.X. and Du, Y. (2002) Structure and Magnetic Properties of La3+-Substituted Strontium Hexaferrite Particles Prepared by Sol-Gel Method. Physica Status Solidi, 193, 314-319.https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200209)193:2&lt;314::AID-PSSA314&gt;3.0.CO;2-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahal, J.N., Neupane, D. and Mishra, S.R. (2019) Exchange-Coupling Behavior in SrFe12O19/La0.7Sr0.3Mno0.3 Nanocomposites. Ceramics, 2, 100-111.https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics2010010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mocuta, H., Lechevallier, L., Le Breton, J.M., Wang, J.F. and Harris, I.R. (2004) Structural and Magnetic Properties of Hydrothermally Synthesised Sr1-xNdxFe12O19 Hexagonal Ferrites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 364, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00545-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lechevallier, L., Le Breton, J.M., Wang, J.F. and Harris, I.R. (2004) Structural and Magnetic Properties of Hydrothermally Synthesised Sr1-xNdxFe12O19 Hexagonal Ferrites. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 269, 192-196.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(03)00591-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J.F., Ponton, C.B. and Harris, I.R. (2001) A Study of the Magnetic Properties of Hydrothermally Synthesised Sr Hexaferrite with Sm Substitution. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 234, 233-240.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00366-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lechevallier, L., Le Breton, J.M., Morel, A. and Tenaud, P. (2008) On the Solubility of Rare Earths in M-Type SrFe12O19 Hexaferrite Compounds. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 20, Article ID: 175203.https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/17/175203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Polyko, D.D., Bashkirov, L.A., Trukhanov, S.V., Lobanovskii, L.S. and Sirota, I.M. (2011) Crystal Structure and Magnetic Properties of High-Coercivity Sr1-xPrx Fe12-xZnxO19 Solid Solutions. Inorganic Materials, 47, 77-79.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168511010110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, Y.J. and Liu, X.S. (2014) Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of La-Cu Doped M-Type Strontium Ferrites Prepared by Ceramic Process. Materials Technology, 29, 232-236.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corral Huacuz, J.C. and Mendoza-Suárez, G. (2002) Preparation and Magnetic Properties of Ir-Co and La-Zn Substituted Barium Ferrite Powders Obtained by Sol-Gel. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 430, 430-433.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)01141-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torkian, S., Ghasemi, A., Shojarazavi, R. and Tavoosi, M. (2016) Structural and Magnetic Properties of High Coercive Al-Substituted Strontium Hexaferrite Nanoparticles. Journal of Superconducativity and Novel Magnetism, 29, 1627-1640.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-016-3450-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trusov, L.A., Gorbachev, E.A., Lebedev, V.A., Sleptsova, A.E., Roslyakov, I.V., Kozlyakova, E.S., Vasiliev, A.V., Dinnebier, R.E. Jansen, M. and Kazin, P.E. (2018) Ca-Al Double-Substituted Strontium Hexaferrites with Giant Coercivity, Chemical Communications, 54, 479-482. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC08675J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Narang, S.B., Singh, A. and Singh, K. (2014) High Frequency Dielectric Behavior of Rare Earth Substituted Sr-M Hexaferrite. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 8, 347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shannon, R.D. (1976) Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 751-767. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wagner, T.R. (1998) Preparation and Crystal Structure Analysis of Magnetoplumbite-Type Baga12O19. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 136, 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1997.7681</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cullity, B.D. (1956) Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahal, J.N., Wang, L., Mishra, S.R., Nguyen, V.V., and Liu, J.P. (2014) Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of SrFe12-x-yAlxCoyO19 Nanocomposites Prepared via Autocombustion Technique. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 595, 213-220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zi, Z.F., Sun, Y.P., Zhu, X.B., Yang, Z.R. and Song, W.H. (2008) Structural and Magnetic Properties of SrFe12O19 Hexaferrite Synthesized by a Modified Chemical Co-Precipitation Method. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 320, 2746-2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.06.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiesinger, G., Muller, M., Grossinger, R., Pieper, M., Morel, A., Kools, F., Tenad, P., Le Breton, J.M. and Kreisel, J. (2002) Substituted Ferrites Studied by Nuclear Methods. Physica Status Solidi, 189, 499-508.https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200202)189:2&lt;499::AID-PSSA499&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lechevallier, L., Le Breton, J.M., Teillet, J. Morel, A., Kools, F. and Tenaud, P. (2003) Mossbauer Investigation of Sr1-xLaxFe12-yCoyO19 Ferrites. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 327, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01712-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Breton, J.-M., Teillet, J., Wiesinger, G., Morel, A., Kools, F. and Tenaud, P. (2002) Mossbauer Investigation of Sr-Fe-O Hexaferrites La-Co Addition. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 38, 2952-2954. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2002.803177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kools</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>(1985</year>)<article-title>Factors Governing the Coercivity of Sintered Anisotropic M Type Ferrite</article-title><source> Le Journal de Physique Colloques</source><volume> 46</volume>,<fpage> 346</fpage>-<lpage>349</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, X.Z., Morrish, A.H., Li, Z.W. and Hong, Y.K. (1991) Site Preference for Co2+ and Ti4+ in Co-Ti Substituted Barium Ferrites. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 27, 4654-4656. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.278906</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, D.H., Yang, Z., Zeng, H.X., Zhou, X.Z. and Morrish, A.H. (1994) Cation Site Preference and Magnetic Properties of Co-Sn-Substituted Ba Ferrites Particles. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 137, 191-196.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)90205-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, D.H., An, S.Y., Lee, S.W., Shim, I.-B. and Kim, C.S. (2004) Site Occupancy and Anisotropy Distribution of Al Substituted Ba-Ferrite with High Coercivity. Physica State Solid, 241, 1736-1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200304633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albanese, G. (1995) Mossbauer Investigation of Aluminium Substituted Barium Hexaferrites in the Paramagnetic State. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 147, 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)00063-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lechevallier, L., Le Breton, J.M., Morel, A. and Tenaud, P. (2007) Influence of the Presence of Co on the Rare Earth Solubility in M-Type Hexaferrite Powders. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 316, e109-e111.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghimire, M., Yoon, S., Wang, S.L., Neupane, D., Alam, J. and Mishra, S.R. (2018) Influence of La Content on Magnetic Properties of Cu Doped M-Type Strontium Hexaferrite: Structural, Magnetic, and Mossbauer Spectroscopy Study. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 454, 110-120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.01.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kunwar, D.L., Neupane, D., Dahal, J.N. and Mishra, S.R. (2019) Structural, Magnetic, and Electrical Properties of Re Doped Sr0.82Re0.18Fe12-xAlxO19 (Re = Gd, Pr, Sm) Compound. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 9, 175.https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2019.99014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, B.J., Grandjean, F., Lilot, A.P., Vogel, R.H. and Gerard, A. (1987) 57Fe Hyperfine Interaction Parameters and Selected Magnetic Properties of High Purity MFe12O19 (M = Sr, Ba). Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 67, 123-129.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(87)90728-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wartewig, P., Krause, M.K., Esquinazi, P., Rosler, S. and Sonntag, R. (1999) Magnetic Properties of Zn- and Ti-Substituted Barium Hexaferrite. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 192, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00382-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obradors, X., Solans, X.A., Collomb, D., Samaras, J., Rodriguez, M., Pernet, M. and Font-Altaba, M. (1988) Crystal Structure of Strontium Hexaferrite SrFe12O19. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 72, 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(88)90025-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dixit, V., Nandadasa, C.N., Kim, S.G., Kim, S., Park, J., Hong, Y.K. and Moitra, A. (2015) Site Occupancy and Magnetic Properties of Al-Substituted M-Type Strontium Hexaferrite. Journal of Applied Physics, 117, Article ID: 243904.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101584-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lechevallier, L. and Le Breton, J.M. (2005) Substitution Effects in M-Type Hexaferrite Powders Investigated by Mossbauer Spectrometry. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 290, 1237-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.411</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>