<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JTR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Tuberculosis Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2329-843X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jtr.2020.82006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JTR-101187</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;Candida&lt;/i&gt; Co-Infection with &lt;i&gt;Mycobacterium tuberculosis&lt;/i&gt; in Tuberculosis Patients and Antifungal Susceptibility of the Isolates
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Smart</surname><given-names>Enoch Amala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asikiya</surname><given-names>Hanson</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gloria</surname><given-names>N. Wokem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Rivers State University Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It had been observed that tuberculosis (TB) subjects can be co-infected with 
  Candida sp. which was previously assumed as normal flora of the oral cavity. 
  Candida sp. might become an opportunistic pathogen in immune compromised individuals. 
  Candida co-infection with 
  Mycobacterium tuberculosis in TB patients might complicate underlying disease process in the lungs. 
  <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A total of 400 sputum samples were collected from TB patients and examined using Ziehl-Neelsen staining technique and MDR/RIF Genexpert system for TB. Samples positive for 
  Mycobacterium tuberculosis were cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar with gentamicin and examined for the presence of budding yeast cells and pseudohyphae on Gram’s stain. 
  Candida sp. isolated from TB positive sputa were cultured on CHROMager 
  Candida for identification to species level and subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing. 
  <b>Results:</b> Out of 400 sputum samples examined for TB 93 (23.3%) were positive and 32 (34.4%) out of 93 TB positive cases were co-infected with 
  Candida sp. 
  Candida albicans was the most
   predominant species with a prevalence of 23 (67.6%),
   C. tropicals 4 (11.8%),
   C. krusei 4 (11.8%) and
   C. parapsilosis 3 (8.8%). One sample had dual infection. Female subjects had high prevalence (19.4%) than the male (15.7%). Age group 31 - 40 years had both high prevalence of TB 32.3% and 
  Candida 25.0%. Antifungal susceptibility testing showed that isolated 
  Candida sp. were more susceptible to vericonazole and fluconazole compared to nystatin. 
  <b>Conclusions: </b>Tuberculosis weakens the immune systems of infected persons especially when prophylactic administration proves abortive or there is non-adherence to treatment prescriptions. This may cause the development of multidrug resistance TB. 
  Candida sp. may utilize these opportunities to establish alongside 
  M. tuberculosis and worsen treatment and patient condition. For good treatment of TB, 
  Candida co-infection should be screened concomitantly with TB in TB suspected individuals. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Tuberculosis</kwd><kwd> Candida</kwd><kwd> Co-Infection</kwd><kwd> Antifungal Susceptibility</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Co-infection is the simultaneous infection of a host with more than one disease causing agent. Worldwide, the prevalence or incidences of co-infection in the life of human were unknown but it is now known to be common [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref1">1</xref>] and even more common than single infection. A global common co-infection is that of tuberculosis and HIV and of recent, tuberculosis and Candida. In some countries up to about 80% of tuberculosis patients are co-infected with HIV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref2">2</xref>] and about 15% - 32% of tuberculosis patients are also co-infected with Candida sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>]. AIDS involves co-infection of end-stage HIV with opportunistic parasites and poly-microbial infections like Lyme disease with other diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref4">4</xref>]. Candidiasis is a fungal infection that can be caused by any species of Candida. It can spread to other parts of the body apart from the mouth and vagina which can result in fever and other symptoms depending on the site of infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref5">5</xref>]. Despite all efforts made globally, tuberculosis as an infectious disease remains a global threat. About 9.6 million people were diagnosed of having new cases of tuberculosis infection and about 1.5 million deaths were recorded as a result of this disease in 2014. Approximately 1.2 million (12%) of these cases were related to HIV infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref6">6</xref>]. A total of 1.5 million people died from TB in 2018 including 251,000 people living with HIV. TB is the major cause of death from a single infectious agent (above HIV/AIDS) and one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref7">7</xref>]. The estimate in 2018 was that 10 million people were sick with tuberculosis (TB) worldwide, out of these 5.7 million men, 3.2 million women and 1.1 million children. The largest number of new TB cases occurred in the South-East Asian region, with 44% of new cases, followed by the African region, with 24% of new cases and the Western Pacific with 18%. The 30 high TB burden countries accounted for 87% of new TB cases. Eight countries account for about two thirds of the total in decreasing order, India, China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh and South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Different kinds of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary infections might also aggravate factors associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases such as diabetes in elderly patients, high cholesterol levels, lung cancer, immune deficiency and fungal infections of the lungs.</p><p>The rate of recurrence infections and the number of immunosuppressive disease cases are on the increase. It is of great importance that clinical research be carried out by medical health personnel into potential pathogenic secondary fungal diseases bearing in mind that it can influence the progression of tuberculosis infection which might be life threatening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref8">8</xref>]. The occurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis co-infection cases with Candida albicans is about 15% - 32% in different studies. C. albicans have been isolated from different areas such as hospital environment, the air, on surfaces (floors and roofs) as well as in food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>]. The burden of active tuberculosis still continues at alarming rate especially amongst the low and middle income countries with estimated 580,000 new cases arising as a result of multiple drug resistance TB (MDR-TB) worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref6">6</xref>] and in 2018, 7.0 million new cases were notified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref7">7</xref>]. The aim of this study were to determine the prevalence of tuberculosis, tuberculosis Candida co-infection, Candida species associated TB Candida co-infections and antifungal susceptibility of isolated Candida sp.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area and Population</title><p>The study was conducted in the Model Primary Health Centre, Rumuigbo in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State. The choice of this health facility was because it is the centre for GeneXpert Rifampicin assay. The above Local Government Area covers 260 km with a population of 664,789. The target population were TB patients (male and females) attending Rumuigbo Model Primary Health Centre. Samples of non-tuberculosis patients were used as negative control. The studies were carried out from March, 2018 to May, 2019.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sample Size</title><p>Sample size was determined using the formula of Araoye (2003)</p><p>n = z 2 p q d 2</p><p>where, n = sample size minimum, z = proportion of the target population (1.96), q = 1.0 − p and d = degree of accuracy (95% interval) − 0.05%, p = overall prevalence of TB in Nigeria.</p><p>n = 322.7 ≈ 323</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Direct Smear Examination by Microscopy</title><p>A total of 400 sputum samples were obtained from patients attending the Model Primary Health Centre and examined for TB and TB Candida co-infection. The presence of budding yeast cells and pseudohyphae in direct Gram’s stained smear using the &#215;100 objective may aid diagnosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>]. The smears were fixed with alcohol to avoid over absorption of stains by Candida hyphae if present [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref9">9</xref>]. Candida sp. grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar were examined by microscopy (wet mount) with &#215;10 and &#215;40 objectives.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. KOH Mount (KOH Preparation)</title><p>A drop of 20% w/v KOH solution was placed on a clean, grease free glass slide. Sputum sample were added to the drop and covered with a cover slip. This was placed in petridish with a damp filter paper under to prevent drying. The preparation was examined microscopically using the &#215;10 and &#215;40 objectives with the condenser iris diaphragm closed sufficiently to give contrast after the digestion of sputum sample.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ziehl-Neelsen Technique</title><p>A thin smear of each sputum sample was made on a clean grease free slide, allowed to air dry and heat-fixed by passing the slide 3 - 4 times through a Bunsen flame. The slides were stained with strong carbol-fuschsin on a staining rack. The slide was gently heated under by passing flame under the staining rack until steam rises without allowing it to boil. The slides were allowed to stand for 5 minutes, rinsed with water and decolourized with 20% H<sub>2</sub>S0<sub>4</sub> until the slide appeared light pink in colour. This was rinsed in water and then counterstained with methylene blue (0.5%) for 1 - 2 minutes. Slides were rinsed with water and allowed to air dry after wiping the back of the slide and examined with oil immersion xl00 objective.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Germ Tube Production Test</title><p>A little portion of 18 - 72 hours old colony of yeast was suspended in 0.5mL of human serum in a test-tube. Positive and negative controls were set up. All the test-tubes were incubated at 37˚C for 2 - 3 hours. A drop of the mixture of serum and yeast suspension were placed on a clean glass slide and covered with clean cover slip and examined microscopically for presence or absence of germ tube production.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Cultivation of Candida Sp.</title><p>The sputum specimens were cultured on modified Sabouraud-dextrose gentamicin agar medium and incubated at 37˚C for up to 72 hours. Gentamicin inhibited bacterial growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref9">9</xref>]. Pure cultures of Candida sp. isolated were cultivated on CHROMagar Candida.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. CHROMagar Candida</title><p>Culture on CHROMagar is used to identify Candida sp. Isolated yeasts sp. on Sabouraud-dextrose agar were also cultured on CHROMagar Candida and incubated at 37˚C for 48 hours. Identification of Candida sp. on this agar was based on colour production. Light green colonies was Candida albicans, blue Candida tropicalis, pink Candida krusei and cream Candida parapsilosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref10">10</xref>], CHORMagar candida is very useful in the rapid identification of Candida sp.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. GeneXpert Test (Molecular Assay)</title><p>Sputum samples obtained from suspected TB patients were liquefied and inactivated with 2:1 sample reagent. Two (2) mL of the liquefied sputum was transferred into test cartridge. The cartridge was inserted into MTB/RIF test plat (end of hand on work). Sample were automatically filtered and washed. Ultrasonic lysis of filter captured organisms to release DNA. DNA molecules mixed with dry PCR reagents. Semi-nested real-time amplification and detection in integrated reaction tube printable result [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_10"><title>2.10. Sugar Fermentation Reactions</title><p>Peptone water containing a single carbohydrate (1.0%) such as glucose, lactose, sucrose and the other carbohydrates were used. A p<sup>H</sup> indicator (phenol red) was added to the medium to detect change in pH as a result of acid production. Durham’s tubes were also inserted to detect the production of gas. The isolated Candida sp. were inoculated into already prepared and sterilized set of sugars in test tubes. They were incubated at 37˚C for 18 - 48 hours and examined.</p></sec><sec id="s2_11"><title>2.11. Susceptibility Testing</title><p>Each pure culture of Candida sp. was inoculated onto already prepared and dried iso-sensitive agar plate. The inoculated plate was spread evenly by streaking with sterile wire loop to obtain uniform seeding on the entire plate. Commercial antifungal single discs of the three (3) antifungal agents were placed on the inoculated plate with a sterile forceps. The plates were incubated at 37˚C for 18 - 48 hours and the zones of inhibitions were obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s2_12"><title>2.12. Ethical Consideration and Sample Collection</title><p>Ethical approval was obtained from Rivers State Hospitals Management Board, participants were briefed on the objectives of the studies and confidentiality of each patient was assured.</p></sec><sec id="s2_13"><title>2.13. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Statistical analysis was done using one-way Anova with the data generated.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Prevalence of TB and TB Candida Co-Infection</title><p>A total of 400 sputum samples collected from suspected TB patients were examined for TB and candidaisis. Out of these 93 (23.3%) were positive for tuberculosis and 32 (34.4%) were positive for tuberculosis Candida co-infection as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. The Prevalence TB and Candida Co-Infection by Gender</title><p>The prevalence of Candida among TB patients by gender showed that out of 51 females that had TB, 18 (19.4%) had TB Candida co-infection whereas out of 42 males with TB 14 (15.1%) had TB Candida co-infection respectively. The overall TB Candida co-infections from 93 TB subjects were 32 (34.4%). Numbers of females examined were 228 (57%) and males 172 (43%). The prevalence of TB among females was 51 (22.4%) and that of males was 42 (24.4%) as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of TB and TB Candida co-infection</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. Examined</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. Positive</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sputum for TB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93 (23.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TB Candida co-infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (34.4)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Numbers in parenthesis = Percentages.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence TB and Candida co-infection by gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number Examined (TB)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number Positive (TB)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number Examined (Candida)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number Positive (Candida)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (24.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (15.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (22.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (19.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93 (23.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (34.5)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Numbers in parenthesis = Percentages.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Prevalence of Candida sp. among TB Patients</title><p>Four species of Candida were isolated co-infecting with M. tuberculosis. Namely, Candida albicans 21 (65.6%), C. tropicalis 5 (15.6%), C. krusei 5 (15.6%), C. parapsilosis 3 (9.4%). Out of the three species, C. parapsilosis was isolated with C. albicans in particular case. Candida albicans was the most predominant species associated with TB Candida co-infection as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Prevalence of Candida sp. among TB Patients by Gender</title><p>The prevalence of Candida sp. among TB patients by gender showed that female subjects had a prevalence of 12 (66.7%) of C. albicans, C. tropicalis 3 (16.7%), C. Krusei 2 (11.1%), and C. parapsilosis 1 (5.6%) respectively, whereas among the males, C. albicans, 8 (57.1%), C. tropicalis 2 (14.3%), C. Krusei 2 (14.3%), and C. parapsilosis 2 (14.3%) as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and the reactions of isolated Candida sp. on CHORMagar candida as shown in Figures 1(A)-(C) respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Prevalence of Candida Species by Age Groups</title><p>The age groups with the high prevalence of Candida were between 31 - 40 yrs with a prevalence of 8 (25.0%). Age groups 41 - 50 and 51 - 60 yrs were 5 (15.5%) each and age group 61 - 70 yrs was 4 (12.5%). The other age groups were between 0.00% - 6.3% as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Isolated Candida sp.</title><p>Three (3) antifungal agents were used for susceptibility testing namely, voriconazole, fluconazole and nystatin. The Candida sp. were more susceptibility to voriconazole with 16 (80.0%), 3 (15.0%) were moderately susceptible and 1 (5.0%) was resistant. For fluconazole 14 (70.0%) were susceptible, 5 (25.0%) were moderately susceptible, while 1 (5.0%) was resistant. Nystatin 12 (60.0%) were susceptible, 6 (30.0%) were moderately sensitive and 2 (10.0%) were resistant as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of Candida sp. among TB patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Candida sp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number Isolated N = 32</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida albicans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (65.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida tropicalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida krusei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida parapsilosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (9.4)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Numbers in Parenthesis = Percentages.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Gender prevalence of Candida sp. among TB patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Candida Sp. isolated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Males</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Females</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida albicans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (57.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (66.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (65.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida tropicalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (16.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida krusei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (12.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Candida parapsilosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (9.4)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Numbers in Parenthesis = Percentages.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of Candida sp. and TB by age groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age groups (years)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of TB Positive Patients N = 93</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number infected Candida N = 32</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (18.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (16.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (18.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (32.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (25.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (12.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (8.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (12.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 - 80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 - 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.1)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Numbers in Parenthesis = Percentages.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Antifungal susceptibility patterns of isolated Candida sp</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Antifungal Agent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Susceptibility Pattern</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. Susceptible</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentages</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Voriconazole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High +++ Moderate ++ Low +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 &#177; 1.00 3 &#177; 1.00 1 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 15 5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fluconazole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High +++ Moderate ++ Low +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 &#177; 1.00 5 &#177; 1.00 1 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 25 5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nystatin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High +++ Moderate ++ Low +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 &#177; 1.00 6 &#177; 1.00 2 &#177; 1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 30 10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Carbohydrates Fermentation Reactions of Isolated Candida sp.</title><p>Carbohydrates fermentation reactions tests showed that C. albicans is a non-lactose and non-inositol fermenter but ferments glucose, maltose, sucrose, galactose and xylose and was positive for germ tube test. C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis had the same biochemical characteristics as that of C. albicans in utilization of carbohydrates but are negative for germ tube test. C. Krusei fermented only glucose and was germ tube negative. C. parapsilosis fermented glucose, maltose, sucrose and galactose but not lactose and inositol and was also germ tube negative as showed on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> below.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Identification of isolated Candida species</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gram’s Raction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >KOH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Germ tube</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Colour on CHROMagar</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sucrose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lactose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Galactose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Xylose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inositol</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Candida species</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. albicans</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tropicalis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pink</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. krusei</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. parassilosis</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>KEY: + = Positive, − = Negative.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Despite all global efforts to eradicate TB, tuberculosis (TB) as an infectious disease has remained a global threat. Co-infection of the respiratory tract by fungi and tuberculosis had been recognized for its wide range of clinical spectrum and chronicity. Among the respiratory fungal infections, infections by Candida sp. were the commonest fungal infectious agents isolated from sputa of TB patients. In this study, the prevalence of TB was 93 (23.3%) but the prevalence of TB Candida co-infection was 32 (34.4%). It may be assumed that some of the devastating effects of TB on infected persons might result from the synergistic actions of both organisms. A similar study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref9">9</xref>] had a prevalence of 25.3% TB Candida co-infection and Candida albicans were the most prevalent species as also observed in this study.</p><p>Some researchers speculated that since Candida were part of the normal microbiota of the throat in about 32.5% of healthy individuals, the sputum produced may have been contaminated with Candida sp. Using Kahampaa criteria that three (3) or more repeated isolation of Candida or more than 30 colonies of Candida on sabouraud dextrose agar should be considered pathogenic and should not be treated as commensal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref12">12</xref>]. The observations of pseudomycelial forms in sputum were also suggestive of fungal infection other than ordinary colonization. The prevalence of Candida co-infection among tuberculosis subjects as observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>] was 40%. The prevalence of TB Candida co-infection was high among females (19.4%) than in males (15.1%) in this study. This result however is not in agreement with the results obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref13">13</xref>], they observed that colonization rate of Candida sp. were equal in both males and females, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref14">14</xref>] in their study found Candida infection to be more in males than in females.</p><p>Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref9">9</xref>] observed that Candida infections were significantly high in males (26.1%) than in females (23.1%). In this study, the prevalence of TB Candida co-infection was high among females (19.4%) compared to males (15.1%) and this agrees with the study conducted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>] who observed that TB Candida co-infections were significantly high among female patients (62.5%) compared to male patients (29.4%). The prevalence rates of Candida sp. among both sexes correlates with that of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in males and females. The high prevalence in the females could be attributed to the fact that more women seek for medical attention and treatment than males and due to increased outdoor and social activities observed among females. One-way Anova comparison of males and females did not show significant difference.</p><p>Among the Candida sp. isolated, C. albicans were the predominant species with a prevalence of 21 (61.8%). This was in line with the studies carried out by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref10">10</xref>] both reported similar prevalence of 50% and 66% respectively. The prevalence of TB/Candida co-infection ranged from 45% - 92% in several Indian studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref15">15</xref>]. In this present study, the prevalence of Candida sp. isolated were 61.8%, 14.7%, 14.7% and 8.8% for C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei and C. parapsilosis respectively. On the contrary, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref9">9</xref>] reported lower rates of C. albicans 15.1%, and C. tropicalis 8.4%. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref15">15</xref>] observed C. tropicalis 3.25%, C. parasilosis 3.25%, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref16">16</xref>] documented Candida tropicalis 19.95%, C. glabrata 16.54% C. parapsilosis 13.14% and C. krusei 5.10%. These variations may be attributed to differences in local prevalence of different species of Candida due to different environmental conditions as well as the isolation techniques employed. It was also observed in this study that among the non C. albicans sp., Candida tropicalis was the second predominant species which correlates with findings of similar studies conducted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref18">18</xref>]. Comparison of all species of Candida showed that there was significant variation (p = 0.0001) between the different species of Candida isolated.</p><p>The prevalence of TB Candida co-infection by age groups was high among age group 21 - 30 years (18.8%) and 31 - 40 years (25.0%). The high prevalence among the two age groups could be as a result of increased outdoor activities as they associate with one another, overcrowding in most of the settlements and poor standard of living. It could also be attributed to increased reproductive activities within the age groups that were described as the most active segment of any economy. This observation was in compliance with the work done by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref19">19</xref>] with a prevalence of 81.6% among the age group 21 - 40 years. The findings of this study were also in agreement with the work conducted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref20">20</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref21">21</xref>] both reported high prevalence of TB Candida co-infection among age group 21 - 40 years. However, the finding of this study differs with the work conducted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref22">22</xref>] which showed a high prevalence of TB Candida co-infection among age groups 40 years and above. The corresponding high prevalence of TB and Candida infection among the age groups may predict predisposition and synergism in the course of the co-infection. There was no statistical difference (p = 0.1287) among the age groups for TB Candida co-infection. Comparison of 1 - 20 years and 21 - 50 years was not statistically significant (p = 0.1705), and there was no statistical difference between 1 - 20 years and 51 - 100 (p = 0.2321). However comparison of 21 - 50 and 51 - 100 showed significant difference (p = 0.0463). It was also noted that the prevalence of Rifampicin resistance TB (MDR-TB) was 1.1%. This prevalence rate of MDR-TB was below the estimated value based on modeling for Nigeria which ranged from 3.2% - 5.4% for new cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref23">23</xref>]. The findings in this study (1.1%) Rifampicin resistance was not in agreement with the findings of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref24">24</xref>] who recorded a prevalence rate of 14.7% MDR-TB in Yengeoa, Bayelsa State. This disparity could be attributed to environmental factors. Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) were TB with bacilli resistance to at least isoniazide and rifampicin which are the two main first line anti-tuberculosis drugs which have become an important concern in the control of TB in many countries, especially in the sub-Sahara Africa where the burden of other competing diseases like malaria, enteric fever, HIV, etc. were also high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref25">25</xref>]. The discovery of Genexpert MTB/RIF testing has made possible the detection of tuberculosis bacilli resistant to rifampicin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref26">26</xref>]. Drug resistance emanating from inadequate treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis could result from inappropriate therapy, poor prescription practices, in-sufficient treatment duration, irregular medication intake, poor drug selection, inadequate public health resources and socio-economic determinants of health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref27">27</xref>].</p><p>The three antifungal agents used for susceptibility testing were voriconazole, fluconazole and nystatin. Voriconazole showed high susceptibility against the Candida sp. closely followed by fluconazole. In a similar research carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref29">29</xref>] it was clearly shown that the azoles are frequently used for pulmonary fungal infections and are preferred to intravenous amphotericin B. Though Candida albicans was the commonest pathogen associated with pulmonary candidiasis, there is also an increasing incidence of other Candida sp. Among the non C. albicans species isolated was Candida tropicalis which showed increased prevalence as a new emerging opportunistic pathogen causing severe invasive pulmonary disease. It had been shown to have great capacity of invasion than C. albicans into deep tissues of immunocompromised patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101187-ref29">29</xref>] One-way analysis of variance of the susceptibility patterns showed significant variation (p = 0.0001) between Voriconazole, Fluconazole and Nystatin. Student t-test comparison of Voriconazole and Fluconazole did not show significant difference (p = 0.0705). Student t-test comparison of Voriconazole and Nystatin showed significant difference (p = 0.0003). Student t-test comparison of Fluconazole and Nystatin also showed significant difference (p = 0.0006).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Tuberculosis remains a global threat despite effort to eradicate the disease and TB co-infection with Candida sp. may complicate infection and treatment. The most predisposed age groups to both infections were ages 20 to 40 years, the most active segment of the economy. Screening for TB should be conducted concomitantly with candidiasis and TB treatments should be combined with the administration of anti-fungal agent confirmed by susceptibility testing in cases of TB Candida co-infections.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Limitation of Study</title><p>The limitation of this study was the non inclusion of the molecular aspect of Candida.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Amala, S.E., Hanson, A. and Wokem G.N. (2020) Candida Co-Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Tuberculosis Patients and Antifungal Susceptibility of the Isolates. Journal of Tuberculosis Research, 8, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2020.82006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.101187-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cox, F.E. (2001) Concomitant Infections Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology, 122, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118200001698X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) Indicators (2010) A Minimum Set of Indicators for the Programmatic Management of MDR-TB in National Tuberculosis Control Program. WHO/HTM/TB/2010.11, World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kali, A., Charles, M.P., Noyal, M.J., Sivaraman, U., Kumar, S. and Easow, J.M. (2013) Prevalence of Candida Co-Infection in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Australasian Medical Journal, 6, 387-391.  
https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2013.1709</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitchell, L.S. and Jeffrey, U.S. (1990) Evolution of the Protists and Protistan Parasites from the Perspective of Molecular Systematic. International Journal for Parasitology, 29, 11-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Centre for Disease Control (2014) Symptoms of Invasive Candidiasis.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2015) Estimates of Tuberculosis Incidence by Country.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2019) Global TB Report WHO/CDS/TB/2019.23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, X.H., Gao, Y.C., Zhang, Y., Tang, Z.H., Yu, Y. and Zang, G.O. (2015) Tuberculosis Infection Might Increase the Risk of Invasive Candidiasis in an Immune Competent Patient. The Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de S&amp;#227;o Paulo, 57, 273-275. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652015000300016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndukwu, C.B., Mbakwem-Aniebo, C. and Frank-Peterside, N. (2016) Prevalence of Candida Co-Infection among Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Emuoha, Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 11, 60-63.  
https://doi.org/10.9790/3008-1105036063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathavi, S., Shankar, R., Kavitha, A. and Sasikala, G. (2014) Indra Priyadharsin. A Study on Prevalence of Pulmonary Candidiasis among Tuberculosis Patients and Use of GiRomager Identification of Candida Species. Journal of Drug and Therapeutics, 4, 118-121. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v4i3.821</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fred</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Two-Hour Detection of MTB and Resistance to Rifampicin</article-title><source> In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 332</fpage>-<lpage>339</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kahanpaa</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1972</year>)<article-title>Bronchopulmonary Occurrence of Fungi in Adults, Especially According to Cultivation Material</article-title><source> Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section B Microbiology Immunology</source><volume> 227</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>147</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hidalgo, J.A. and Vazquez, J.A. (2012) Candidiasis.  
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213853-overview</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shear, A.N. and Perween, T. (2004) A Study on the Trend in Prevalence of Opportunistic Candida Co-Infections among Patients of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 857-862.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baradkar, V.P., Mathur, M., Wanjari, K. and Kumar, S. (2009) Candida in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Bombay Hospital Journal, 51, 52-53.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.53216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Latha, R., Sasikala, R., Muruganandam, N. and Venkatesh Babu, R. (2011) Study on the Shifting Patterns of Non Candida albicans Candida in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Evaluation of the CHROM Agar in Identification of the Candida Species. Journal Microbial Biotechnology Research, 1, 133-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jha, B.J., Tamang, M.D., Joshy, M.E., Shivananda, P.G. and Brahmadatan, K.N. (2006) Characterization of Candida Species Isolated from Cases of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 20, 290-294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sani, R.A., Garba, S.A., Oyeleke, S.B. and Abalaka, M.E. (2015) Prevalence of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) in Minna and Suleja, Niger State. Nigeria American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 5, 287-291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwachukwu, N.C., Orji, A., Kanu, I. and Okereke, H.C. (2009) Epidemiology of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Some Part of Abia State Federal Republic of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Epidemiology, 2, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3923/aje.2009.13.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uzoewulu, N.G., Ibeh, I.N., Lawson, L., Goyal, M., Umenyonu, N., Ofiaeli, R.O. and Okonkwo, R. (2014) Drug Resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Tertiary Hospital South East, Nigeria. Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis, 1, 2.  
https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okonko, I.O., Soleye, F.A., Adeniji, F.O. and Okerentugba, P.O. (2012) HIV and TB Co-Infection among Patients on Directly Observed Treatment of Short Course in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Natural Science, 10, 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO Nigeria (2016) Tuberculosis Country Profile 2016. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peter, O.I. and Ikenna, D.E. (2010) Prevalence of Rifampicin Resistance by Automated Genexpert Rifampicin Assay in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Yenegoa, Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal, 29, 204.  
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.204.14579</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Out, A., Umoh, V., Habib, A., Ameh, S., Lawson, L. and Ansa, V. (2013) Drug Resistance among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Calabar, Nigeria.  
http://www.atmph.org/text.asp?2013/6/5/491/133685  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/235190</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onyedum, C.C., Alobu, I. and Ukwaja, K.N. (2017) Prevalence of Drug-Resistance Tuberculosis in Nigeria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 12, e0180996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180996.g001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amala, S.E., Goodluck, S. and Nwokah, G.E. (2019) The Prevalence of Tuberculosis (TB) and Multiple Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) Tuberculosis in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Health and Medical Research, 5, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pappas, P.G., Rex, J.H., Sobel, J.D., Filler, S.G., Dismukes, W.E., Walsh, T.J., et al. (2004) Guidelines for Treatment of and Candidiasis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38, 161-189. https://doi.org/10.1086/380796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lovacheva, O.V., Kornienko, I. and Kul’ko, A.B. (2005) Efficiency of Treatment of Candida-Induced Lower Respiratory Tract Lesions in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Problemy Tuberkuleza i Bolezne&amp;#238; Legkikh, No. 3, 14-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101187-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, S.K., Agrawal, R.L., Sharma, D.A. and Agrawal, M. (1982) Candida in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 28, 24-29.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>