<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2020.115016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-100347</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Preparation of New Uric Acid Sensors Based on Iodide Selective Electrode
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ş&amp;uuml;kr&amp;uuml;</surname><given-names>Kalaycı</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  An electrode for uric acid has been prepared by using an iodide selective electrode with the uricase enzyme. The iodide selective electrode used was prepared from 10% TDMAI and PVC according to our previous study. The enzyme was immobilized on the iodide electrode by holding it at pH 7 phosphate buffer for 20 min at room temperature. The H
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>2</sub> formed from the reaction of uric acid was determined from the decrease of iodide concentration that was present in the reaction cell. The potential change was linear in the 2 &#215; 10
  <sup>-5</sup> to 2 &#215; 10
  <sup>-4</sup> M uric acid concentration (3 - 34 mg uric acid/100ml blood) range. Uric acid contents of some blood samples were determined with the new electrode and consistency was obtained with a colorimetric method. The effects of pH, iodide concentration, the amount of enzyme immobilized and the operating temperature were studied. No interference of ascorbic acid, glucose and urea was observed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Uric Acid Electrode</kwd><kwd> Uricase</kwd><kwd> Enzyme</kwd><kwd> Iodide Selective Electrode</kwd><kwd> Uric Acid in Blood</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Enzyme electrodes are being used for the measurement of different organic substrates. In most of them potentiometric sensors, e.g. oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref1">1</xref>] carbon dioxide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref2">2</xref>], or ammonium ion electrodes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref3">3</xref>] have been used, but some of them use different voltammetric measuring techniques.</p><p>Determination of uric acid in body fluids is a clinically valuable diagnostic indicator. The presence of elevated uric acid levels is a sign of gout, hyperuricemia, or Lesch-Nyhan syndrome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref4">4</xref>]. The development of an electrochemical uric acid biosensor with an immobilized enzyme on an electrode surface has been the aim of several recent studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref7">7</xref>]. In some of these procedures the enzyme uricase is used. This enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of uric acid to allontoin in the presence of carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide is formed. Hydrogen peroxide formed during this reaction can be determined with amperometric [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref8">8</xref>] or potentiometric sensors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>A novel optical detection system consisting of combination of uricase/HRP-CdS quantum dots (QDs) for the determination of uric acid in urine sample is described. The QDs were used as an indicator to reveal fluorescence property of the system resulting from enzymatic reaction of uricase and HRP (horseradish peroxidase), which is involved in oxidizing uric acid to allaintoin and hydrogen peroxide. The linearity of the system toward uric acid was in the concentration range of 125 - 1000 &#181;M with detection limit of 125 &#181;M [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>An electrochemical biosensor based on gold and palladium nano particles- modified nanoporous stainless steel (Au-Pd/NPSS) electrode has been introduced for the simultaneous determination of levodopa (LD) and uric acid (UA). Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was used for the simultaneous determination of LD and UA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>In this study, uricase was trapped in plasticized PVC and iodide ion selective electrode was used to monitor iodide. This electrode has an average slope of 63 mV/ten uric acid. When this electrode is used 4 times a day, it has a life of 70 days. The electrode is not sensitive to glucose and ascorbic acid. This study describes the preparation and application of a new potentiometric uric acid sensor.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Apparatus and Reagents</title><p>Potential measurements were made with JENWAY 3030 Ion Analyser. “A double junction Ag/AgCl electrode 9240368” was used as the outer reference electrode. The enzyme was immobilized on our previously prepared iodide electrode. For the pH measurements, the ion analyzer with 924005 combined pH electrode is used. All measurements were made with a 30 ml glass cell prepared for this purpose. A magnetic stirrer was used throughout the experiments. All reagents used were analytical reagent grade (Merck). Triply distilled water was used for the preparation of solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation of Electrode</title><p>The iodide electrode in which the enzyme was fixed was prepared according to the procedure developed by us [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref15">15</xref>]. For this purpose, approximately 180 mg of PVC and 60 mg of ion exchanger (tridodecylmethylammonium iodide) are dissolved in 5 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). Then 0.2 ml of plasticizer (dibutyl phthalate) is added and mixed. After evaporation of the solvent the ﬁlm membrane is cemented to a PVC tube with inner diameter of 10 mm, the tube is ﬁlled with 0.1 M KI and 0.1 M NaCl solution. A home-made Ag/AgCl electrode is immersed as the inner reference.</p><p>For the immobilization procedure, ﬁrst 10 mg of enzyme is dissolved in 5 ml phosphate buffer (pH = 7). The iodide electrode prepared as the above given procedure is kept in it for 2 h at room temperature. This electrode was stored in pH 7 buffer at +2˚C when not in use. The measurements are made in 19 ml pH 7 phosphate buffer, 1 ml 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> M Mo(VI) and in the presence of 0.01 M iodide solution.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><p>Uric acid is oxidized by air oxygen in the presence of uricase enzyme and hydrogen peroxide is formed, which reacts with iodide ion quantitatively. Thus, this reaction can be used for the determination of uric acid when known concentration of iodide is present. The decrease of iodide concentration will be proportional to uric acid concentration according to the following reactions.</p><p>Uricacid + O 2 → uricase allantoin + CO 2 + H 2 O 2</p><p>H 2 O 2 + 2I − → Mo ( VI ) I 2 + H 2 O</p><p>Molybdenum (VI) or peroxidase enzyme can be employed as the catalyst the last has the advantage of higher efﬁciency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref11">11</xref>]. As can be seen two moles of iodide are used for one mole of uric acid. Thus the change of concentration of iodide after reaction with uric acid can be used for the determination of uric acid. In this work we used iodide electrode for the determination of iodide concentration before and after the reaction with uric acid.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of Iodide Concentration</title><p>Since one mole of uric acid uses two moles of iodide its concentration has to be higher than uric acid concentration. The optimum concentration of iodide has to be determined for a uric acid concentration that is in the range of glucose present in blood. For this purpose, solutions with 19 ml pH 7 phosphate buffer and 1ml 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> M (Mo(VI)) have been prepared containing various iodide concentrations of 1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup>, 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> and 1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> M. Their potentials were measured and then after each uric acid addition once more the potentials were measured. The uric acid concentrations in the cell were in the range of blood serum, changing from 2 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> M (3 mg/100ml) to 2 &#215; 10<sup>-4</sup> M (34 mg/100ml blood). As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> the slope was the highest for 10<sup>−2</sup> M iodide concentration.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of pH and Buffer Concentration</title><p>Adjustment of pH is important both for the immobilization of enzyme and for the reaction between hydrogen peroxide and iodide. At different pH values changing from 9 to 5.5 the response of electrode has been measured against uric acid concentration when 0.01 M iodide was present. Whereas there was nearly no response at pH values of 5.5, 6, 6.5, 8 and 9 the slope was the largest at pH 7. At this pH the ion exchanger (mentioned in Section 3.3) is positive and enzyme</p><p>is negative, thus it is the most convenient pH for immobilization and for the reaction.</p><p>Phosphate buffer has been chosen because of its pH working area. Its response for uric acid has been investigated at buffer concentrations changing from 1.0 to 10<sup>−3</sup> M. The change of potential against uric acid concentration is given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. As can be seen 0.1 M buffer concentration had the largest slope.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Immobilization of Enzyme</title><p>The ion exchanger (TDMAI) on the iodide electrode becomes a positive charge at pH = 7, at this pH the enzyme becomes minus charge and thus the enzyme will be immobilized on the electrode surface. The quantity of enzyme will be important since only one part of it can be immobilized on the electrode surface. For this purpose, iodide electrode was dipped into pH 7 phosphate buffer solutions each containing 5, 10 and 20 mg/ml enzyme for 2 h. It was washed with distilled water and its response has been measured for uric acid concentrations in the presence of 0.01 M iodide. As can be observed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the slope was the largest for 10 mg/ml enzyme.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effect of Temperature</title><p>Optimum temperature is very important since the enzyme activity will increase with temperature, but on the other hand at high temperatures there may be thermal deactivation of the enzyme and also decrease of O<sub>2</sub> concentration. In a solution containing 0.01 M iodide, the potential of a solution of 1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> M uric acid has been followed between temperatures of 30˚C - 60˚C within 5˚C intervals. The maximum activity of the enzyme was obtained at 50˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Response and Lifetime</title><p>This electrode did not lose its activity for 45 days when used 4 times a day. The response time was measured at different uric acid concentrations. As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the response was almost immediate. The lifetime of the electrode is also very good compared with other electrodes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Interference Studies</title><p>The product of enzymatic reaction is hydrogen peroxide, thus reducing agents such as glucose and ascorbic acid, two compounds commonly found in biological ﬂuids, may interfere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref9">9</xref>]. The strong interference of glucose and ascorbic acidin a former study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref9">9</xref>] was eliminated after pretreatment with hydrogen peroxide. With our new electrode in the presence of 0.01 M iodide and 2 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> M uric acid there was no interference from the above mentioned substances in the concentration ranges that are commonly encountered in biological ﬂuids (0 - 2.5 mM). The selectivity constants determined by using the mixed solution method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100347-ref16">16</xref>] are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Measurement of Uric Acid in Blood Serum</title><p>It was found that, with this new electrode the uric acid could be determined with high accuracy and precision (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). For a solution containing 5 mg/100ml the result obtained for 4 measurements was 4 &#177; 0.1 mg/100ml.</p><p>The blood samples that were analyzed for their uric acid quantity were obtained from the University Health Center. They were ﬁrst centrifuged with a speed of 9000 round/min and these were used for uric acid determination. First the potential of a solution containing 19 ml buffer (pH = 7), 1 ml 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> M Mo (VI) and 0.01 M iodide was measured. A 0.1 ml of serum sample was added and the potential was once more measured. Then two standard additions of 0.1 M uric acid (each 0.1 ml) were made and potentials were measured. From the change of potentials, the amount of uric acid in blood was determined. Blood samples shall not wait long time; otherwise uric acid will be lost because of destruction. If it has to wait additions of ﬂuoride or ascorbic acid is needed. Glucose quantities for three different blood samples are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> with the results of University Health Center (colorimetric) for comparison.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Selectivity coefficient ( K A , B pot ) for the uric acid electrode in mixed solutions (in the presence of 1 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> M uric acid)<sup>a</sup>.<sup> </sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >B</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascorbic acid</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K A , B pot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>A: Uric acid; B: Interfering ion.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Determinations of uric acid in a known samples<sup>a</sup>.<sup> </sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Uric acid (mg/100ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Uric acid determined with the new electrode (mg/100ml)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>i</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X &#175;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CI*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1 &#177; 0.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>CI: 95%, N = 4.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Uric acid levels in the four different blood samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quantity given from health center (mg/100ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Uric acid levels, with the new electrode (mg/100ml)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#177; 0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7 &#177; 0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>95% CI, N = 4.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>A new enzyme based electrode is prepared by using an iodide selective electrode. Here one electrode works as enzyme holder and at the same time it monitors the iodide concentration. Since the iodide electrode is constructed with an ion exchanger and not with AgI, it does not show any interference of most common ions such as chloride and sulfate. The prepared sensor displayed very good performance in regard to reproducibility, sensitivity and long lifetime. It shows linear response in the 3 - 34 mg/100ml concentration range with a slope of about 63 mV per decade change of uric acid.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author thanks to the Gazi University research fund for the financial support of this research.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kalaycı, Ş. (2020) Preparation of New Uric Acid Sensors Based on Iodide Selective Electrode. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 11, 205-212. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2020.115016</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.100347-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Updike, S. and Hicks, G.P. (1967) Reagentless Substrate Analysis with Immobilized Enzymes. Science, 158, 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.158.3798.270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalcher, K., Svancara, I., Buzuk, M., Vytras, K. and Walcarius, A. (2009) Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors Based on Heterogeneous Carbon Materials. Monatshefte f&amp;uuml;r Chemie—Chemical Monthly, 140, 861-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0131-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raab, L.S., Decker, G.L., Jonas, A.J., Kaetzel, M.A. and Dedman, J.R. (1991) Glucocoticoid Regulation of Rat Liver Urate Oxidase. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 47, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240470104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Pérez, D., Ferrer, M.L. and Mateo, C.R. (2003) A Reagent Less Fluorescent Sol-Gel Biosensor for Uric Acid Detection in Biological Fluids. Analytical Biochemistry, 322, 238-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2003.08.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G&amp;uuml;lce, H., &amp;Ouml;zy&amp;ouml;r&amp;uuml;k, H., &amp;Ccedil;elebi, S.S. and Y&amp;yuml;ld&amp;yuml;z, A. (1995) Amperometric Enzyme Electrode for Aerobic Glucose Monitoring Prepared by Glucose Oxidase Immobilized in Poly(vinylferrocenium). Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 394, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(95)04013-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, L.-X., Xu, F. and Okada, T. (1998) Studies on Optimization of a Platinum Catalyst and Porphine Modified, Pyrolytic Graphite, Amperometric, Glucose Sensor by Sequential Level Elimination Experimental Design. Talanta, 47, 1165-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(98)00195-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campanella, L. and Tomassetti, M. (1989) Sensors in Pharmaceutical Analysis. Selective Electrode Rev., 11, 69-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Losada, J. and Pilar, M. (1997) A Glucose Amperometric Sensor Based on Covalent Immobilization of Glucose Oxidase in Poly-2-Aminoaniline Film via Chloranil on Platinized Platinum Electrode. Electroanalysis, 9, 1416-1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140091808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagy, G., Von Storp, L.H. and Guilbault, G.G. (1973) Enzyme Electrode for Glucose Based on an Iodide Membrane Sensor. Analytica Chimica Acta, 66, 443-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)82564-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hitti, I.K.A., Moody, G.J. and Thomas, J.D.R. (1984) Glucose Oxidase Membrane Systems Based on Poly(vinyl chloride) Matrices for Glucose Determination with an Iodide Ion-Selective Electrode. Analyst, 109, 1205-1208. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9840901205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merkoi, A., Fabregas, E. and Alegret, S. (1999) Consolidated Biocomposite Membrane Technology for Production of Potentiometric Biosensors. Sensors &amp; Actuators, B, 60, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00262-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, U., Alvi, N.H., Ibupoto, Z., Nur, O., Willander, M. and Danielsson, B. (2011) Selective Potentiometric Determination of Uric Acid with Uricase Immobilized on ZnO Nanowires. Sensors and Actuator B, 152, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azmi, N.E., Ramli, N.I., Abdullah, J., Hamid, M.A.A., Sidek, H., Rahman, S.A., Ariffin, N. and Yusof, N.A. (2015) A Simple and Sensitive Fluorescence Based Biosensor for the Determination of Uric Acid Using H2O2-Sensitive Quantum Dots/Dual Enzymes. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 67, 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rezaei, B., Shams-Ghahfarokhi, L., Havakeshian, E. and Ensafi, A.A. (2016) An Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Nanoporous Stainless Steel Modified by Gold and Palladium Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Determination of Levodopa and Uric Acid. Talanta, 158, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Somer, G., Kalayci, S. and Ekmeki, G. (2001) Preparation and Application of Iodide-Mercury Selective Membrane Electrode Based on Ion Exchangers. Sensors &amp; Actuators B, 81, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00942-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100347-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srinivasan, K. and Rechnitz, G.A. (1969) Selectivity Studies on Liquid Membrane, Ion Selective Electrodes. Analytical Chemistry, 41, 1203-1208. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60279a014</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>