<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2020.1050069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-100322</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Clandestine Abortion in Bangui, Central African Republic
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N.</surname><given-names>R. Ngbale</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Koïrokpi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Mbano-Dede</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Matoullou-Mbala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>C.</surname><given-names>E. Gaunefet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Manirakiza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Sepou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut Pasteur of Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Hopital Communautaire de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>744</fpage><lpage>750</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction
  :
   The clandestine abortions remain a major health problem in developing countries including the Central African Republic. At the main maternity hospital of Bangui in the Central African Republic, a study conducted in 2000 indicates that clandestine abortions (CAs) accounted for 43
  .
  4% of all abortions recorded in the service. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the evolution of CAs about the health care management efforts made over the last 4 years.
   
  <b>Patients and Methods:</b>
   We conducted a prospective descriptive and analytical study over a period of 4 years (from January 2016 to December 2019). This study focused on the complications of clandestine abortions that occurred during the course of our study at the HCB reference maternity hospital.
   
  <b>Results:</b>
   We identified 267 clandestine abortions for 783 spontaneous abortions. The frequency of CAs was 34.1%. The highest number of CAs was observed in patients aged between 20 
  and
   24 years with an average age of 23.7 years. The average parity was 2.6. It appeared in our study that students were the most represented (40.8%). Rescuers were the most incriminated (29.2%) in clandestine abortion (CA). Infectious complications predominated in (79.1%) of cases. Antibiotic therapy was almost systematic (96.6%). Laparotomy was performed in (38.9%) cases. The proportion of deceased women who had a pregnancy of more than 12 weeks was higher with a statistically significant difference (p &lt;
   
  0.001).
   
  <b>Conclusion:</b>
   Abortion affects all women regardless of age, parity, marital status and socio-economic status.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Abortion</kwd><kwd> Management</kwd><kwd> Bangui</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Around the world, women have always used induced abortions to stop unwanted pregnancies inducing high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality, including uterine sepsis. Despite its illegal nature and stigmatization in several countries south of the Sahara, some women do not hesitate to resort to clandestine methods and this in dangerous conditions. The complications of these clandestine abortions are responsible for 13% of maternal deaths according to the World Health Organization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref1">1</xref>]. However, data on abortion in sub-Saharan Africa are still rare and non-representative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref2">2</xref>]. In the Central African Republic, voluntary termination of pregnancy is prohibited by law (article 190 of the Central African Republic Penal Code). This forces women to perform clandestine abortions (CAs) at the risk of their lives. A study conducted 15 years ago indicates that CAs accounted for 43.4% of all abortions recorded in the service [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Despite the recommendations made to reduce the incidence of these accidents, there are still many CAs presenting in the maternal emergency service of the H&#244;pital Communautaire of Bangui in the Central African Republic. This was another reason for undertaking this study, which has the following objectives: to provide knowledge about the burden of CAs in the H&#244;pital Communautaire of Bangui in order to contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality related to the complications of these abortions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We conducted a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study over a period of 4 years (from January 2016 to December 2019). This study focused on the complications of clandestine abortions that occurred during our study at the maternity of H&#244;pital Communautaire. The study population consisted of women admitted to the service for complications of CAs. The size of our sample was determined by the number of patients meeting the inclusion criteria after their informed consent. Patients admitted for spontaneous abortion were not included in the study. For each patient selected, the following parameters were studied: socio-demographic characteristics; the term gestational; gynecological and obstetric history; motivations for abortion; the method used to induce abortion; the professional profile of the abortionist; the complications found; the treatment administered; the duration of hospitalization; evolution and prognosis.</p><p>Data collection was performed using a structured questionnaire. The data was entered and analyzed on Epi-info version 7. Pearson’s Chi2 comparison statistical tests were performed and the threshold of statistical significance was 5%. Informed consent was not required from patients.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total number of 267 cases of clandestine abortions were identified. The proportion of CAs was 25.4% of all abortions. The average age was 23.6 years, with the highest number of clandestine abortions in the 20 to 24 age group. The average parity was 2.6. Nulliparas accounted for 23.2%. The marital status of these women showed that a proportion of 82.2% was single. Students were the most represented (40.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>These clandestine abortions were performed by first aiders in 87.5% of cases. The main method used was curettage (65.9%). In. 9% of the cases traditional potions were used (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Infectious complications predominated in 79.1% of cases, represented by endometritis (36.3%), pelviperitonitis (31.4%) and severe sepsis (11.2%). Hemorrhagic complications were found in (13.8%) of the cases. The exit of the loops by the genital sector represented 2.7%. The medical treatment was based on resuscitation and systematic antibiotic therapy (96.6%). Laparotomy for peritoneal lavage was the treatment in case of certain pelvic peritonitis 38.9% of cases, hysterectomy in 2.6% of cases, for total disfigurement of the uterus (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>We recorded 12.7% of deaths. The proportion of deceased women who had a pregnancy of more than 12 weeks of amenorrhea was higher with a statistically significant difference p &lt; 0.001 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). No other factors such as practitioners and method used were found to affect the prognosis.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to parity, marital status and profession</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number (n = 267)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Large multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Singles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widows</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shopping</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Categories of the practitioner and methods used</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number (n = 267)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Category of the practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rescuers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery assistants</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >49</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paramedic students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwives/Nurses</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self abortion (patients)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matrons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patients’ friends</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical doctor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Method used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curettage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medicinal abortion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional potions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Else</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to complications and treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number (n = 267)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometritis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelviperitonitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe sepsis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Haemorrhagic shock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine perforation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lesions of the soft parts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exenteration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antibiotherapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antalgic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ocytocin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood transfusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intrauterine manual aspiration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digital curage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laparotomy for peritoneal hygiene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Repair of soft tissue lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hysterectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bowel resection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by age of pregnancy relative to prognosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Prognosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Age of pregnancy (in week of amenorrhea)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dead</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The results of this work reveal the seriousness of CAs with a prevalence of 25.4%. This finding is made by several African studies that find rates ranging from 23% to 37% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref5">5</xref>]. A study conducted 15 years ago in the service shows a prevalence of 43.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref3">3</xref>]. Sexuality issues are still taboo in the family and girls enter sexual life without proper education [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref6">6</xref>]. This justifies a prevalence of under-25s (59.9%) practicing the most CAs. This trend is almost the same as that found by Mayi-Tsonga in Gabon in 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>The primiparous were the most represented (32.9%). These primiparous young people often do not master the use of contraceptive methods and thus end up with an unwanted pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref9">9</xref>]. Births out of wedlock are often socially sanctioned, abortion is for these young singles (82.2%) the only possibility not to compromise their future and a future marriage. Some authors have found a predominance of nulliparas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref8">8</xref>]. Regarding the qualification of the abortionist, we found that 29.2% of the perpetrators were unqualified health workers, which is consistent with Ekanem’s studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref10">10</xref>]. On the other hand, Orijiet Andriamifidison found during their studies a predominance of self-abortion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref12">12</xref>]. These unskilled workers often use mechanical methods (65.9%), all of which are dangerous because they are performed in non-septic conditions with unskilled personnel who do not know the basic rules of asepsis, act in haste, and are not concerned. hardly respect for the rule of art. We must also note the wandering of the victims and the concern of the girl to hide her condition and her act. All of these factors give rise to the predominance of infectious complications encountered during our study (81.8%). Postabortion care is also inadequate (self-medication) and delays the admission of patients to the appropriate structures, thus lengthening the time to treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>The symptomatic and etiopathogenic treatment was based essentially on antibiotic therapy which was systematic, given the context of lack of asepsis where these abortions were performed. Surgically, manual intrauterine aspiration was the most commonly used procedure. This is consistent with the studies of Lokossouau in Benin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref16">16</xref>]. Laparotomy was necessary in cases of uterine perforation, pelviperitonitis and exenteration. Death is a major risk for women who perform clandestine abortions. We recorded 32 deaths, or 12.7%. Taking into account the difference between the mortality rate of our study, which reflects the reality in other African countries, and the very low rate observed in countries where there has been legalization of abortion, the debate on The liberalization of abortions deserves to be opened especially since the punitive and repressive laws previously in force in the Central African Republic have not proved their worth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100322-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Abortion affects all women regardless of age, parity, marital status and socio-economic status. He intervenes at different times in the cycle of family life. However, we found that complications of clandestine abortions remain an important factor in maternal mortality, while family planning needs are poorly covered. From this point of view, action will have to be taken to restore the importance of family planning as a contribution to the reduction of clandestine abortions. We do not forget the role of the community in raising awareness and adopting responsible sexual behavior among young people.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>NNR, KA and SA were involved in study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of results and drafting the manuscript. MDK, MMS and GCE performed data collection and interpretation. Data acquisition JRM and PM performed laboratory analyses. AM was involved in data analysis, interpretation of results and drafting the manuscript. All authors participated in the manuscript writing and approved the final version of this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that there is no competing of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngbale, N.R., Ko&#239;rokpi, A., Mbano-Dede, K., Matoullou-Mbala, S., Gaunefet, C.E., Manirakiza, A. and Sepou, A. (2020) Clandestine Abortion in Bangui, Central African Republic. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 744-750. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1050069</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.100322-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2007) Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2003. 5th Edition, WHO, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rossier, C., Guiella, G., Ouedraogo, A. and Thieba, B. (2006) Estimating Clandestine Abortion with the Confidants Method: Results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Social Science &amp; Medicine, 62, 254-266. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sepou, A., Ngbale, R., Yanza, M.C., Domande-Mobanga, Z. and Nguembi, E. (2004) Analyse des avortements à la maternité de l’hopital communautaire de Bangui. Medecine tropicale, 64, 61-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, S., Prada, E., Mirembe, F. and Kuggundu, C. (2005) The Incidence of Induced Abortion in Uganda. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 183-191.  
https://doi.org/10.1363/3118305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levandowski, A., Mhango, C., Kuchingale, E., Lunguzi, J., Katengaza, H., Gebreselassie, H. and Singh, S. (2013) The Incidence of Induced Abortion in Malawi. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 88-96.  
https://doi.org/10.1363/3908813</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sepou, A., Nguembi, E., Yanza, M.C., Ngbale, R. and Nali, M.N. (2004) Comportement sexuel des étudiants de l’Université de Bangui (Centrafrique). Medecine tropicale, 64, 163-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayi-Tsonga, S., Diallo, T., Litochenko, O., Methogo, M. and Ndombi, I. (2009) Prévalence des avortements clandestins au Centre Hospitalier de Libreville, Gabon. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 102, 230-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahlback, E., Maimbolwa, M., Kasonka, L., Bergestrom, S. and Ransjo-Arvidson. A.B. (2007) Unsafe Induced Abortions among Adolescent Girls in Lusaka. Health Care for Women International, 28, 654-676.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330701462223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kigbu, J.H., Daru, P.H. and Ujah, I.A. (2009) Review of Maternal Deaths from Unsafe Abortion in Jos, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 18, 103-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekenem, E.I., Etuk, S.J., Ekabua, J.E. and Iklaki, C. (2009) Clinical Presentation and Complications in Patients with Unsafe Abortions in University Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 18, 370-374.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/njm.v18i4.51245</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oriji, V.K., Jeremiah, I. and Kasso, T. (2009) Induced Abortion amongst Undergraduate Students of University of Port Harcourt. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 18, 99-202. https://doi.org/10.4314/njm.v18i2.45065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andriamifidison</surname><given-names> N.Z.R. Mandrosovololona</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.T.</surname><given-names> Zoliaimarisoa</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> E.</surname><given-names> Rakatondrazanany</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> E.J.</surname><given-names> Rakotonirina</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> R.</surname><given-names> Andriampanalinarivo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> H.</surname><given-names> Rokotomanga</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> J.D.M. and Ranjalany</surname><given-names> J.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Avortements provoqués au service de gynécologie-obstétrique de Befelatanana, Antananarivo en 2009</article-title><source> Médecine d’Afrique noire</source><volume> 60</volume>,<fpage> 163</fpage>-<lpage>168</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonate Thieba, B., Belem-Guilat, N., Akontianga, M., Lankoande, E., Dao, B.J. and Kone, B. (2008) Evaluation des services de soins après avortement au Burkina-Faso. Journal de communication abstracts de communication SAGO, 4-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cisse, C.T., Diagne, A., Faye, E.O. and Faye, K.G. (2004) Amélioration de la qualité des Soins Apres Avortement en zone rurale au Sénégal. Cahiers Santé, 14, 245-250.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lokossou, A., Komongui, D.G., Denakpo, J., Anjorin, M., De Souza, J. and Perrin, R.X. (2008) Prise en charge thérapeutique actuelle des avortements à risque dans les CHU de Cotonou. Journal de communication SAGO, 96-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100322-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gebreselassie, H.M., Fetters, T., Singh, S., Abdella, A., Gebrehiwot, Y., Tesfaye, S., Geressu, T. and Kumbi, S. (2010) Caring for Women with Abortion Complications in Ethiopia: National Estimates and Future Implications. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1363/3600610</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>