<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2020.115027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-100138</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;Nymphaea lotus&lt;/i&gt; L. and &lt;i&gt;Nymphaea micrantha&lt;/i&gt; Guill. et Perr Seeds as Cereal Substitute in the Delta of Senegal River
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatou</surname><given-names>Kine Gueye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Cyrille Ayessou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mame</surname><given-names>Samba Mbaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michel</surname><given-names>Bakar Diop</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mady</surname><given-names>Cissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kandioura</surname><given-names>Noba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratoire d’Electrochimie et des Procédés Membranaires/Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité Alimentaire et les Molécules Fonctionnelles-Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique, University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Unité de formation et de Recherche des Sciences Agronomiques, de l’Aquaculture et des Technologies Alimentaires University Gaston Berger, Saint-Louis, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Botanique-Biodiversité, Biologie Végétale, University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>05</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>375</fpage><lpage>384</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Studies conducted in the delta and lower valley of Senegal river have demonstrated through ethnobotanical surveys, the importance of 
  Nymphaea lotus L. and 
  Nymphaea micrantha Guill. et Perr in the diet and in the pharmacopoeia. The seeds are used with good appreciation by the indigenous population as a welding food. But studies addressing their biochemical and nutritional aspects are still very rare in the literature. This study was initiated in order to fill this gap and allow a better appreciation of the nutritional and energetic potentialities of these seeds. For this purpose, seeds were collected in effluent from the Senegal River, dried in the shade and put into three different batches: a batch of red seeds of 
  N. lotus, a batch of Black seeds of 
  N. 
  lotus and a batch of seeds of 
  N. micrantha. The biochemical analyses gave their moisture content (9.17% &#177; 0.2% to 13.36% &#177; 3.46%), aw (0.46% to 0.71%), protein (7.90% &#177; 1.25% to 8.24% &#177; 0.5%), lipid (2.32% &#177; 0.45% to 4.29% &#177; 1.0%), carbohydrate (74.49% &#177; 0.9% and 77.66% &#177; 1.65%), mineral matter (1.77% &#177; 0.06% to 2.55% &#177; 0.08%). All three types of seeds have high levels of potassium (481.10% &#177; 17.62% to 770.81% &#177; 42.33%), magnesium (312.71% &#177; 14.08% to 518.67% &#177; 15.23%) and calcium (188.81% &#177; 8.52% to 296.52% &#177; 16%. Their energy values (350.54 &#177; 15.21 kcal/100g to 375.7 &#177; 3.48 Kcal/100g), are closed to other cereals consumed in the human diet in Senegal. Therefore, these seeds offer the opportunity to diversify the diet in the delta and lower valley of the Senegal River.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Nymphaea&lt;/i&gt; Seeds</kwd><kwd> Nutritional Value</kwd><kwd> Senegal</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Food security and safety are major challenges in countries around the world, currently facing climate hazards and population growth. All over the word, 821 million people or one person out of nine, are suffering from hunger in 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref1">1</xref>]. This remains a serious problem in Africa where the population was above exceeded 1 billion in 2009 and continues to grow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref2">2</xref>]. However facing to these challenges there is growing interest to consider the called neglected and under-used species. In fact, they have considerable potential to ensure food security and cover the population’s health, care needs and contribute to the poverty reduction effort [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref4">4</xref>]. Most of the plant species can provide food and are used to complete nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref5">5</xref>]. Otherwise, they are used for traditional medicines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref6">6</xref>], such as Dioscorea rotundata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref7">7</xref>], Maerua pseudopetalosa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref8">8</xref>] and Cyperus esculentus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref9">9</xref>]. Wild fruits of Nymphaea lotus and Nymphaea micrantha also fall into this group. They are aquatic species that are abundant in the freshwater of the Senegal River valley. Attention has so far focused on their ornamental character through their domestication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref10">10</xref>]. Recently, the therapeutic properties of N. lotus’s leaves have been demonstrated in the treatment of breast cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref11">11</xref>], in the regulation of blood pressure and the restoration of erectile function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref12">12</xref>]. Rhizomes of Nymphaea are also used for tanning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref13">13</xref>]. In terms of food, almost all part of the species are useful (leaves, peduncles, flowers, stems, rhizomes and seeds) of the genus Nymphaea are edible such as in Northern Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref14">14</xref>], in Equateur Province-R. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref15">15</xref>]. All these studies have shown the potential that can still be derived from these species. In Senegal, seeds of N. lotus and N. micrantha have been used to supplement diet in time of food shortage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref16">16</xref>]. They have numerous socio economic uses in the region of Senegal River valley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref16">16</xref>] such as ornamental characters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref10">10</xref>], sold for therapeutic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref12">12</xref>], and for tanning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref13">13</xref>]. Despite the importance of those species there is a dearth of information on their biochemical and nutritional components. This study was initiated in order to fill this gap and to allow a better appreciation of the nutritional potentialities of Nymphaea’s seeds.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Biological Materials</title><p>Three batches of water lily seed were established from three species. N. lotus with black seeds (batch 1); N. lotus with red seeds (batch 2) and N. micrantha (red seeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Each N. lotus batch consist of 3 samples collected from three effluents of the Senegal River at the villages of Ndiaye (16˚12'7&quot;W; 16˚15'55&quot;N), Mboudom (16˚03'30&quot;W; 16˚25'45&quot;N) and Ndiandane (14˚59'12&quot;W;</p><p>16˚35'06&quot;N). The third batch of N. micrantha seeds (Lot 3) is made of two samples from two effluents in Saint-Louis (16˚24'21&quot;W; 16˚03'24&quot;N) and Ross-bethio (16˚07'05&quot;W; 16˚17'59&quot;N). The samples are dried in the shade at room temperature (30˚C) for 48 hours and sent to the laboratory for characterization.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><p>Caracterization of Nympea’s seeds consist to determine several parameters. The moisture content of the seeds was determined after dehydration at 105˚C according to the official method AFNOR NF V 03-921. The nitrogen component was determined by Kjeldhal’s method according to NF 03-050 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref17">17</xref>] and proteins were calculated using 5.7 as coefficient. The total minerals were determined after 4 hours incineration at 550 ˚C according to V76-101 method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref17">17</xref>]. After incineration the ashes were collected in a mixture of hydrochloric and nitric acids. The content of potassium, calcium, magnesium and sodium were evaluated by determination with an atomic absorption spectrometer according to the guidelines of the AFNOR standard NF V76-122 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref17">17</xref>]. The lipid determination was carried out by weighing the fats after Soxhlet extraction with diethyl ether according to the method NF V 03-905 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref17">17</xref>]. The carbohydrate content was evaluated by calculation, using the average between the content of water, ash and other organic matter of (protein or nitrogen component and lipid content). The energy value is calculated according to Atwater formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analyzes</title><p>The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used in this research combined with the STATISTICA 7.1 software at 5% level of significance. Through this statistical analysis samples are compared according to each parameter. Statistical differences with a probability value less than 0.05 (P &lt; 0.05) are considered significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>This study has determined the major biochemical composition of N. lotus and N. micrantha seeds and assessed their energy and nutritional intake. This preliminary work is one of nutritional interest following previous studies in the same region by Gueye et al. (2019) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref16">16</xref>]. These two species are prized and edible in the delta and lower Senegal River’s valley. Their fruits are globular and filled with seeds. They can undergo stages of sun drying and grinding into flour that is often consumed in main dishes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref16">16</xref>]. Water lily seeds are also consumed in northern Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref14">14</xref>], Equator Province of Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref15">15</xref>], China, East India and the Philippine Islands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref10">10</xref>]. Floury bulbs reminiscent of potatoes; they are roasted, boiled or cooked under ashes and can be dried and reduced to flour, According to Betti and Mebere Yemefa (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref19">19</xref>], in the far north of Cameroon, the flowers and stems are also consumed as appetizers. All these uses showed that species of this genus are potentially valuable for human consumption.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Moisture and Water Activity</title><p>Water activity values varied between 0.46% and 0.71% and the lowest is noted in N. lotus black seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Water activity has values below 0.75% and is in the considered in food chemistry to stabilize food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref20">20</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows a significant difference with respect to the water activity (Aw) from different seeds analysed (P-value &lt; 0.05). Water activity is an important parameter in food that can prevent the risk to spoil the food. The biochemical and microbiological stability of food could be compromised if the values are too high, as this would reduce the shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref22">22</xref>]. In general, N. lotus and N. micrantha seeds have Aw’s values that guarantee their good stability. The low values are correlated with those of the water content. To characterize the samples, the moisture content is generally low (not exceeding 10%), indicating good seed storage. Moisture values obtained is between 9.17% &#177; 0.2% and 13.36% &#177; 3.46% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Comparison of the averages shows that the moisture contents are statistically identical (at the 0.05 threshold) between the three types of seeds. Nevertheless, red N. lotus seeds have higher moisture contents than black seeds (13.36% &#177; 3.46% and 9.66% &#177; 0.61% respectively). These values are close to those of peanuts, beans, and pigeon peas, which average 10% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref23">23</xref>]. However, they are higher than those of N. lotus seeds reported in Nigeria by Mohammed et al., 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref24">24</xref>] (4.18 &#177; 0.176) and Wasagu et al., 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref25">25</xref>] (6.00% &#177; 0.45%). This difference could be</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate components and energy value of Nymphaea’s seeds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seeds of N. micrantha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Black seeds of N. lotus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Red seeds of N. lotus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.17 &#177; 0.02 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66 &#177; 0.61a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.36 &#177; 3.46a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1512398</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aw (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#177; 0.06a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.05b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#177; 0.01c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04231344</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (% DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.90 &#177; 1.25a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24 &#177; 0.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93 &#177; 2.29a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4169</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipids (% DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71 &#177; 0.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32 &#177; 0.45a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4389</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glucid (% DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.66 &#177; 1.65a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.04 &#177; 1.36a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.49 &#177; 0.90a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.893</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (Kcal/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366.65 &#177; 2.97a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.7 &#177; 3.48ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350.54 &#177; 15.21b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0622</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DM: dry matter; a, b, c: In the same row, means followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P &lt; 5% threshold (Newman and Keuls’ method).</p><p>due to local thermal and hygrometric conditions. The moisture content from seeds is a determining factor in the prevention of insect infestations as dried grains with a moisture content below 12% inhibit the development of most insect pest species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref23">23</xref>]. Several previous works highlight the importance of moisture as it has an impact on processing conditions and product stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref26">26</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Proximate Components</title><p>The protein content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) is between 7.90% &#177; 1.25% and 8.24% &#177; 0.5% DM. The results have showed that N. micrantha seeds and N. lotus seeds have significantly identical protein contents (P-value &gt; 0.05). The highest level was observed in black N. lotus seeds (8.24 &#177; 0.5). The protein level obtained in the seeds of Nymphaea. spp (above 7.5%) is close to the values of Vigna unguiculata variety Katiola (10.193 &#177; 0.075) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref27">27</xref>]. However, they are much higher than the values reported by Musa et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref28">28</xref>] (3.09% &#177; 0.08%) and Wasagu et al. (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref25">25</xref>] (1.04% &#177; 0.17%) for N. lotus seeds.</p><p>The determination of the lipid level allows the evaluation of the energy reserve of Nymphaea seeds. The range varies from 2.32% &#177; 0.45% to 4.29% &#177; 1.0% with a highest content in black N. lotus seeds (4.29% &#177; 1.0%) and lowest in red N. lotus seeds (2.32 &#177; 0.45). N. micrantha had a content of 2.71% &#177; 0.5%. Lipid contents did not vary according to the types of seeds analysed. However, they are comparable to those reported for Pennisetum glaucum (6.0 &#177; 1.5) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref29">29</xref>], Zea mays (6.1 &#177; 2.3), Sorghum bicolor (4.5 &#177; 0.9), Digitaria exilis (3.25% &#177; 3.9) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref30">30</xref>] and Cicer arietinum (6.0 g/100) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref31">31</xref>]. However, they are higher than those of pulses such as Pisum sativum (1.2 g/100), Phaseolus vulgaris (0.9 g/100) and Lens culinaris (1.1 g/100) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>Carbohydrate levels in Nymphaea sp. seeds range from 74.49% &#177; 0.9% to 77.66% &#177; 1.65% DM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). No significant differences were observed following a statistical comparison of the means. The species N. micrantha had the highest seed content (77.66% &#177; 1.65% DM) while the black and red seeds of N. lotus contain less with 76.04% &#177; 1.36% and 74.49% &#177; 0.9% respectively. Stored in the form of starch in cereals, carbohydrates are assimilated to natural laxatives which can facilitate digestion and thus constitute a source of energy used in a primordial way by the organism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref32">32</xref>]. Moreover, the carbohydrate contents found in this study are similar to those reported by Wasagu et al. (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref25">25</xref>] in leaves (71.83% &#177; 1.63%), roots (61.31% &#177; 1.86%) and seeds of N. lotus (80.96 &#177; 0.37). They are also comparable to those of Sorghum bicolor (74.4 &#177; 2.0) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref29">29</xref>] and Digitaria exilis (79.05% &#177; 23.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref31">31</xref>]. This high quantity in Nymphaea seeds could be an asset for their valorization in the manufacture of marketable by-products such as starch, glucose and even alcohol.</p><p>Regarding the energy intake of these seeds in human food, black N. lotus seeds have the best values (375.7 &#177; 3.48 Kcal/100g). N. micrantha seeds and red N. lotus seeds have significantly different values and respectively 366.65 &#177; 2.97 kcal/100g and 350.54 &#177; 15.21 kcal/100g (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These values are close to those reported by Musa et al., 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref28">28</xref>] for N. lotus seeds (399.35 kcal/100g). They are also close to those others species commonly consumed in the human diet (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). This shows that N. lotus and N. micrantha seeds can contribute to dietary diversification and provide a very good source of energy.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Mineral Matter of Nymphaea Seeds</title><p>The total mineral content was 2.55% &#177; 0.08% for N. micrantha, 1.77% &#177; 0.06% for black N. lotus seeds and 1.89% &#177; 11% for red N. lotus seeds, with a significant difference between N. micrantha and red N. lotus seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The black N. lotus seeds have a content close to both types of seeds. The major mineral content of the different Nymphaea seeds is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The results for sodium showed no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) between the three types of seeds and are low (11.0 mg/100g in average). However, for potassium, calcium and magnesium, there was a significant difference between N. micrantha seeds and red and black N. lotus seeds. N. micrantha seeds are the ones containing more minerals with 770.81 &#177; 42.33 for potassium, 518.67 &#177; 15.23 for magnesium, 296.52 &#177; 16.3 for calcium and 13.52 &#177; 1.14 mg/100g for sodium. Moreover, the three types of seeds analysed showed a higher potassium content (ranging from 454 to 770.81 mg/100g), similar to berries and exotic fruits (e.g. strawberry, blackcurrant, grape, African akee, orange, avocado, banana, date, fig) which</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between Nymphaea seeds analysed in this study and others seeds reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref33">33</xref>]</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Proximate (g/100g mati&#232;re DM)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. micrantha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. lotus Black seed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. lotus Red seed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Secale cereale L.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avena sativa L.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hordeum vulgare L. (beaded variety)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Triticum aestivum L. (white variety)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Triticum aestivum L. (red variety)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Oriza sativa L.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zea mays L.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glucid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (Kcal/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366.65 &#177; 2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.7 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350.54 &#177; 15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >337.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >339.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >378.46</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mineral content of Nymphaea’s seeds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >N. micrantha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. lotus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. lotus</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P-values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(black seed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(red seed)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55 &#177; 0.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77 &#177; 0.06ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89 &#177; 11b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01656</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >(mg/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >770.81 &#177; 42.33a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481.10 &#177; 17.62b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >454.32 &#177; 42.67c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01073</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.52 &#177; 16.3a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188.81 &#177; 8.52b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.06 &#177; 13.29c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007266</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >518.67 &#177; 15.23a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312.71 &#177; 14.08b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >317.48 &#177; 21.62c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002905</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.52 &#177; 1.14a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.55 &#177; 2.21a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.99 &#177; 6.83a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6065307</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>contain 59 to 782 mg/100g dry matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref34">34</xref>]. However, the sodium content is found to be the lowest among the dosed minerals. This remark is confirmed by Musa et al., 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref28">28</xref>]. In general, apart from sodium, all other minerals from the three types of seeds (potassium, calcium, magnesium) have high values that are above 180 mg-100 g-1 dry matter. This is an indication that seeds of Nymphaea spp. would probably be important for the prevention of certain diseases. Indeed, these nutrients have a positive impact on the maintenance and regulation of blood pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100138-ref35">35</xref>] which remains one of the biggest problems of our populations.</p><p>This study has shown that Nymphaea spp. seeds are seeds are comparable to cereals that are important in the diets of populations all over the word. This justifies their use in the past as a substitute for rice and millet during the dearth period. In addition, Nymphaea spp. seeds offer an opportunity for rural women to improve their income by adding value to them and marketing them on a larger scale.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study is a contributory approach in the knowledge of neglected and under-used species in order to better understanding of their nutritional input. The dietary importance of N. lotus and N. micrantha seeds was demonstrated to be a good manner to diversify the diet. However, regarding valorization, some complementary investigations such as secondary metabolites, fatty acids profile, should improve a better knowledge of these seeds.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The publication fee of this paper was possible thanks to the support of the European DAfrAli research project.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Gueye, F.K., Ayessou, N.C., Mbaye, M.S., Diop, M.B., Ciss&#233;, M. and Noba, K. (2020) Nymphaea lotus L. and Nymphaea micrantha Guill. et Perr Seeds as Cereal Substitute in the Delta of Senegal River. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 11, 375-384. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2020.115027</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.100138-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organisation (2018) l’état de la sécurité alimentaire et de la nutrition dans le monde: renforcer la résilience face aux changements climatiques pour la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition. FAO, FIDA, OMS, PAM, UNICEF.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Bank (2011) The Little Data Book on Africa. Washington, D.C.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayes, S., Massawe, F.J., Alderson P.G., Roberts, J.A., Azam-Ali, S.N. and Hermann, M. (2011) The Potential for Underutilized Crops to Improve Security of Food Production. Experimental Botany, 63, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err396</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahane, R., Hodgkin, T., Jaenicke, H., Hoogendoorn, C., Hermann, M., Keatinge, J.D.H., Hughes, J.A., Padulosi, S. and Looney, N. (2013) Agrobiodiversity for Food Security, Health and Income. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33, 671-6937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0147-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biesalski Hans, K.A. and Tinz, J. (2018) Micronutrients in the Lifecycle: Requirements and Sufficient Supply. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 11, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2018.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Finco, F.D.B.A., Kloss, L. and Lutz, G. (2016) Bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba) Phenolic Extract Induces Apoptosis in the MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Line via the Mitonchondria-Dependent Pathway. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2016.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Touré, M., Stessens, J., Mayao, A.G. and Zohouri, G.P. (2003) Variation saisonnière de l’offre de l’offre et des prix de l’Igname en c&amp;#244;te d’ivoire. Agronomie Africaine, 4, 69-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayessou, N.C., Guèye, M., Dioh, E., Konteye, M., Cissé, M. and Dornier, M. (2009) Composition nutritive et apport énergétique du fruit de Maerua pseudopetalosa (Gil et Gil-Ben) DeWolf (Capparidaceae), aliment de soudure au Sénégal. Fruits, 64, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2009010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, B., Ayessou, N.C., Cisse, O. Ibn Kh., Balde, S., Cisse, M., Diop, C.M. and Sakho, M. (2018) Potentialités technologiques par l’évaluation biochimique de la farine des tubercules du souchet Cyperus esculentus L. Afrique Science, 14, 209-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selvakumari, E., Shantha, A.C., Sreenath, K. and Purushoth, P.T. (2016) Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Genus Nymphaea. Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR), 5, 2278-5213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabran, G.R., Akhanovna, J., Bekro, M., Pira, J.L., Bekro, Y.A., Sommerer, N., Verbaere, A. and Meudec, E. (2014) Identification de composés phénoliques extraits de deux plantes de la pharmacopée ivoirienne .Soc. Ouest-Afr. Chim, 38, 57-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kameni, M.P., Dzeufiet, D.P.D., Bilanda, D.C., Mballa, M.F., Mengue, N.Y.S., Tchoupou, T.H., Ouafo, A.C., Ngoungoure, M.C., Dimo, T. and Kamtchouing, P. (2019) Nymphaea lotus Linn. (Nymphaeaceae) Alleviates Sexual Disability in L-NAME Hypertensive Male Rats. Journal of Hindawi Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2019, Article ID: 8619283.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8619283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayaweera, D.M.A. (1982) Medicinal Plants Used in Ceylon. The National Science Foundation, Colombo, 50-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blench, R. (2016) Dagomba Plant Names. United Kingdom, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konda, K. M., Kabakura, M., B., Mbembe, Y’ok. Itufa, Mahuku, K., Mafuta, M., Mpoyi, K., Ndemankeni, I., Kadima, K., Kelela, B., Ngiuvu, V., Bongombola, M., Dumu, L. and Latham, P. (2012) Plantes médicinales de traditions Province de l'Equateur R.D. Congo, Kinshasa. Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (I.R.S.S.) in Kinshasa, 419 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, F.K., Mbaye, M.S., Dieng, B., Ndour, S., Gueye, M. F., Gaye, A. and Noba, K. (2019) Connaissances endogènes des espèces du genre Nymphaea dans le delta et la basse vallée du fleuve Sénégal. International journal of Current Research, 11, 9130-9134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afnor (1982) Produits dérivés des fruits et légumes, jus de fruits. éd. Afnor, Paris, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greenfield, H., Southgate, D.A.T, (1992) Food Composition Data and Food Composition Data Bases. In: Food Composition, Data, Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3544-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betti, J.L. and Mebere Yemefa, S.R. (2011) Contribution à la connaissance des produits forestiers non ligneux du parc national de Kalamaloué, Extrême-Nord Cameroun: les plantes alimentaires. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5, 291-303. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v5i1.68105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marc, F., Davin, A., Deglène-Benbrahim, L., Ferrand, C., Baccaunaud, M. and Fritsch, P. (2004) Méthodes d’évaluation du potentiel antioxydant dans les aliments. Studies of Several Analytical Methods for Antioxidant Potential Evaluation in Food. Journal of méDecine Sciences, 20, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2004204458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tonon, R.V., Brabet, C. and Hubinger, M.D. (2008) Influence of Process Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of A&amp;#231;ai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) Powder Produced by Spray Drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 88, 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingwatee,N., Apichartsrangkoon, A., Worametrachanon, P.C., Techarung, S. and Pankasemsuk, J.T. (2015) Spray Drying Lactobacillus Casei 01 in Lychee Juice Varied Carrier Materials. LWT Food Science and Technology, 62, 847-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organisation (2014) Systèmes Appropriés de Stockage des Semences et des Grains pour les Agriculteurs à Petite échelle: Pratiques clés pour les praticiens de la RRC. FAO.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed, H.A., Uka, U.N. and Yauri, Y.A.B (2013) Evaluation of Nutritional Composition of Water Lily (Nymphaea lotus Linn.) from Tatabu Flood Plain, North-Central, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 8, 261-264. https://doi.org/10.3923/jfas.2013.261.264</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wasagu, R.S.U., Lawal, M., Galadima, L.G. and Aliero, A.A. (2015) Nutritional Composition, Antinutritional Factors and Elemental Analysis of Nymphaea lotus (Water Lily). Journal of pure and Applied Sciences, 8, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v8i1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferrari, C.C., Germer, S.P.M., Alvim, I.D., Vissotto, F.Z. and Jaguirre, M. (2012) Influence of Carrier Agents on the Physicochemical Properties of Black Berry Powder Produced by Spray Drying. International Journal of Food Science &amp; Technology, 47, 1237-1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02964.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deffan, K.P., Akanvou, L., Akanvou, R., Nemlin, G.J. and et Kouamé, P.L. (2015) évaluation morphologique et nutritionnelle de variétés locales et améliorées de mais (zea mays l.) Produites en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Afrique Science, 11, 181-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ascherio, A., Rimm, E.B., Giovannucci, E.L., Colditz, G.A., Rosner, B., Willett, W.C., Sacks, F. and Stampfer, M.J. (1992) A Prospective Study of Nutritional Factors and Hypertension among U.S. Men. Circulation, 86, 1475-1484. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.86.5.1475</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souci, S.W., Fachmann, W. and Kraut, H. (2008) Food Composition and Nutrition Tables.7th Edition, Med Pharm, Stuttgart, Germany, 743-1238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA (2009) National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Release 22: Grain Nutrition Comparison. http://www.einkorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Grain-Nutrition-Comparison-Matrix.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordon, M.N. (2000) Comtemporay Nutrition, Issues and Insights. 4th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York, 102-256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rémond, D. and Walrand, S. (2018) Les graines de légumineuses: caractéristiques nutritionnelles et effets sur la santé. Innovations Agronomique, 60, 133-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ballogo, V.Y., Soumanou., M.M., Toukourou, F. and Hounhouigan, J.D. (2013) Structure and Nutritional Composition of Fonio (Digitaria exilis) Grains: A Review International Research. Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 73-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toulsoumdé, L., Ouattara, S., Bationo, F., Parkouda, C., Dao, A., Bassole, I.H.N. and Diawara, B. (2015) Qualité des grains et aptitude à la transformation: Cas des variétés de Sorghum bicolor, Pennisetum glaucum et Zea mays en usage en Afrique de l’Ouest. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9, 2819-2832. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v9i6.23</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100138-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musa, A., Birnin-Yauri, U.A., Muhammad, C. and Umar, A. (2012) Proximate Composition and Mineral Analysis of Nymphaea lotus Seeds. African Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3, 2141-5455.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>