Article citationsMore>>

Lowe, B., Mundt, M., Herzog, W., Brunner, R., Backenstrass, M., Kronmüller, K., et al. (2008) Validity of current somatoform disorder diagnoses: Perspectives for classification in DSM-V and ICD-11. Psychopathology, 41, 4-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000109949

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Is all we know that we know nothing? A critical review of the prevalence of somatoform disorders in the elderly

  AUTHORS: Maria Christina Dehoust, Holger Schulz, Martin Härter, Sylke Andreas

  KEYWORDS: Somatoform Disorders; Epidemiology; Diagnostics; DSM-V; Geriatrics

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Psychiatry, Vol.3 No.4, September 25, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Objective: As noted in previous reviews, the prevalence rates for somatoform disorders in the elderly that have been reported are highly heterogeneous. The main aim of this paper is to identify the reasons for the substantial variation in prevalence rates and discuss the potential of future diagnostic criteria to address current difficulties. Methods: We conducted a selective review of the literature on the prevalence of somatoform disorders in elderly populations. Results: We found significant conceptual differences between the described diagnostic groups and the criteria applied across studies. Moreover, substantial disparities related to sample selection, age cut-offs, and applied measures were revealed. Conclusions: A general conceptual confusion exists throughout the literature regarding somatoform disorders in the elderly that significantly hinder the comparison and integration of results and can lead to premature conclusions. The redefinition of the somatoform disorder category in the next version of the DSM should be taken as an opportunity to address this issue and facilitate research.