Article citationsMore>>

J. R. Allison, M. A. Lemley, K. A. Moore and R. D. Trunkey, “Valuable Patents,” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2004, pp. 435-479.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Market Effects of Patent Litigation

  AUTHORS: Matthew D. Henry

  KEYWORDS: Patents; Litigation; Valuation

  JOURNAL NAME: Technology and Investment, Vol.4 No.1, February 26, 2013

  ABSTRACT: This study measures the value of patents to firms and identifies factors that contribute to that value by observing the abnormal change in firms’ stock market values following court decisions. Firms lose 0.85% (about $19 million) of their value following a decision that one of their patents is “Invalid”, but only gain about 0.7% following a “Valid & Infringed” decision. The factors that that affect the expectations of investors as to the enforceability of patent rights are at least as important in determining the contribution of the patent to the firm’s market value as are characteristics of the patent. Most prominently, this confirms the substantial impact that the creation of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) had on the value of patents. After the creation of the CAFC, “Invalid” decisions resulted in a 0.7% (about $15.5 million) greater loss of firm value. Clearly, patents are more valuable because of this change in the legal landscape.