Article citationsMore>>

Supreme Court of P. R. China, “Supreme Court of P. R. China Interpretation on the Question of Whether or Not, in Hearing the Cases of Crimes Committed by a Unit, the Persons Who Are Directly in Charge and the Other Persons Who Are Directly Responsible for the Crime Should Be Distinguished between Principal Criminal and the Accomplice,” Supreme Court Interpretation No. 31/2000, China, Adopted at 28 September 2000. http://www.lawtime.cn/info/xingfa/fzdwfz/20110214111629.html

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Corporate Criminal Responsibility in China: Legislations and Its Deficiency

  AUTHORS: Yingjun Zhang

  KEYWORDS: Corporate Responsibility; Corporate Crimes; Chinese Criminal Legislations and Deficiencies

  JOURNAL NAME: Beijing Law Review, Vol.3 No.3, September 28, 2012

  ABSTRACT: The Chinese corporate criminal responsibility is featured by the “Double Punishments” imposed both on the Unit who commit a crime and the persons who are directly in charge. As an attributable liability, corporate criminal responsibility requires more precise and detailed principles of attribution in the national criminal law. Unfortunately, it has not archived yet in Chinese Criminal Law. As well, at current, only one kind of monetary penalty, the fine, can be imposed on the Unit who commit a crime. It is far from enough to prevent corporate offences. On enumerating and analyzing Chinese criminal legislations concerning corporate criminal responsibility, the author finds the main deficiency in it and recommend on how to perfect it.