Article citationsMore>>

M. Riminucci, B. Liu, A. Corsi, A. Shenker, A. M. Speigel, P. G. Robey and P. Bianco, “The Histopathology of Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone in Patients with Activating Mutations of the Gsα Gene: Sit Specific Patterns and Recurrent Histological Hallmarks,” Journal of Pathology, Vol. 187, No. 2, 1999, pp. 249-258. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199901)187:2<249::AID-PATH222>3.0.CO;2-J

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Characteristic Radiological and Histological Patterns of Fibrous Dysplasia and Ossifying Fibroma of the Jaws at University of Nairobi Dental Teaching Hospital

  AUTHORS: Jeremiah Moshy, Elizabeth Dimba, Tom Ocholla, Mark Chindia

  KEYWORDS: Diagnostic; Ossifying-Fibroma; Fibrous Dysplasia; Jaws

  JOURNAL NAME: Surgical Science, Vol.3 No.4, April 24, 2012

  ABSTRACT: Objective: To characterize the diagnostic features of ossifying fibroma (OF) and fibrous dysplasia (FD) of the jaw bones. Study Design: A histopathological and radiological analysis with full clinical documentation. Setting: University of Nairobi Dental Teaching Hospital (UNDH). Study Population: All archival cases diagnosed as FD and OF from 1992-2006 were retrieved from the UNDH Oral Pathology Laboratory records. New cases were included as they pre-sented over a 6-month period from January to June 2007. Methodology: Information regarding the histological type of a fibro-osseous lesion (FOL) including the clinical features, demographic and radiographic data was documented for analysis; and comparison between pathological parameters and the final diagnosis was evaluated with the chi-square test. Results: FD lesions constituted 40 (27.2%) cases while 107 (72.8%) were OF. The age ranged from 1 - 72 years (mean = 24.19 ± SD 13 years). The differences in the gender distribution were not statistically significant. Radiographic analyses showed statistically significant differences between the appearances of the body (p = 0.012) and the margins (p = 0.003) of FD and OF. The microscopic differences between the two lesions were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Differentiation between FD and OF is only possible after critically analyzing the clinical, radiological and histological criteria.